REPORT THIS USER NOW

this person is 14, or pretending to be 14, and created an extremely nsfw account for child predators. If this is a child, im praying to fucking god that they stop now this is so fucking disturbing and scary. Please reblog this post after reporting,

link to their account is in the comments. Please help. Do not just like and scroll, this is literally cp on tumblr and it needs to be removed NOW

Im so sorry for spamming tags but i need this to be seen now

All tumblr kids were in at least one of these fandoms growing up and whichever one you were in explains A LOT about you and your issues:

-Wings of Fire

-Percy Jackson

-Harry Potter (Fuck JK Rowling)

-Warrior Cats

-ATLA/LOK

-MLP

-Omori

-Sally Face/Fran Bow/Literally any messed up video game

-FNAF

-Sanrio

-Disney/pixar

-Minecraft (and you watched the minecraft youtubers)

-Comment if i forgot any other fandoms bc im rlly tired rn and can't think :(

Amazing we're here because i love wasting my life on tumblrdotcom

I propose:

THE MOST UNHINGED FANDOM EVER ON TUMBLR

I mean all of us are on tumblr and we're unhinged about everything

I use my ability to make polls and will start a bracket(???) wherein we all fight tooth and nail for winning the most insane fan-following of our favourite book series.

Oh yeah. This bracket is for Book Series, others may follow soon/an hour later/ 17 year later!!

To Enter: Reblog with your entry in the tags, fandom that gets more than 4 rbs will be added to the list!

Hurry! the first 32 fandoms get the chance to be pitted against one-other and we'll all have a crazy time and all that

LESSGOOOO

NOTE: DO NOT REBLOG WITH HARRY POTTER IN THE TAGS. YOU WILL BE BLOCKED.

Welcome to the Bracket of Childhood Books!

Hello! Welcome to the Best Childhood Book bracket, reminiscent of many going around on Tumblr right now, that will decide what this userbase thinks is the best childhood book.

Since we need some clarification, the definition of childhood book in this competition is as follows: a book people read in childhood that must be for a YA age group or younger and has chapters. I developed this definition to keep it as open as possible while making sure picture and adult books were excluded. There are a lot of books that skirt the line between middle grade and young adult, so I figured it best to play it safe and include all YA books, especially for those of us who read at a much higher level. There is a difference between “children’s” book and “childhood” book. ANY book that met those requirements could be submitted, as I am striving to keep my personal opinion out of this competition for the most part. This definition will not change for the foreseeable future.

This masterpost will be updated with links to all the polls regularly, and each poll will last 7 days. If you vote, reblog if you can so more people can vote, and feel free to campaign for your personal favorite if you want!

SUBMISSIONS ARE CLOSED FOR CHILDHOOD BOOKS (320/320)

SUBMISSIONS ARE CLOSED FOR CHILDHOOD WORLDS (192/192)

SUBMISSIONS ARE CLOSED FOR FANTASY BOOKS (320/320)

Please submit with the name of the book and the author. Check the lists to see if anything has been submitted before trying yourself. If a book is part of a series, it will be listed under the series name (i.e. The Lightning Thief > Percy Jackson and the Olympians or The Golden Compass > His Dark Materials). You can find the current list of childhood books here. A world will be listed with its series, and you can find the current list of worlds here. You can find the current list of fantasy books here.

Poll links and rules under the cut

Help decide parameters for submissions with some fringe cases: recently published YA, adult books lots of children/teens read, retelling worlds

First Competition (here)

Second Competition (here)

Third Competition (here)

Fourth Competition (here)

BCW First Competition (here)

Rules/Guidelines

Submissions for Childhood Books

Must be a middle grade or young adult book

Must have chapters

Must be able to be found on Goodreads

Submissions for Childhood Worlds

Must be the setting of a middle grade or young adult book.

Must be either a whole other world (i.e. Narnia, Panem), a setting largely separate from our own world (i.e. Hogwarts, Camp Half-Blood), or a specific setting within our own world that is invented for the purpose of that book (i.e. 221B Baker Street, Ferryport Landing)

Main characters have to have visited this place

Cannot be somewhere that already exists in our world outside that book

Submissions for Fantasy Books

Must be listed as 'fantasy' or some fantasy subgenre within the first three genres on Goodreads or Storygraph

Must be able to be found on Goodreads

Must have chapters but can otherwise be for any age range

Polls

Be respectful (no hate, no harassment, I will block you)

I'm totally okay with spam reblogs; if you want to subject your followers to seventeen copies of a poll, you do you

If you're trying to get my attention about something, @ me or submit an ask, there's no guarantee I'll see all the reblogs

Propaganda

Submit it to me as an ask; I won't be reblogging personal posts or reblogs of the polls

Promote the book you're supporting; it's okay to poke fun at the other books, but please don't attack them or the authors

Only ONE (1) propaganda post per user per book. I really don't want to clog people's dashes with sixty posts about voting for a single book

Asks

Be respectful, not just to me but to all the people who will end up seeing that ask when I post it

If you're asking about a poll or a rule or anything else, please check and see if it's in this post or elsewhere

Try to keep things focused on the competition/books

Competition Hall of Fame

First Competition: Percy Jackson and the Olympians by Rick Riordan

Second Competition: Animorphs by K. A. Applegate

Third Competition: Lockwood & Co. by Jonathan Stroud

Fourth Competition: The Hobbit by J. R. R. Tolkien

I have a panel I'm trying to plan for an upcoming con and I figured there's no better place than tumblr to ask for help with it

The premise is basically just a kahoot game that asks questions about older fandoms, be it insane plot beats in the story (a la ICP becoming the first dual presidents of the United States and Guy Fieri being the antichrist in Homestuck) or insane fandom drama (such as the time a klance shipper tried to blackmail the voltron writers into making it canon, the rainbow dash cum jar, the sharpie bath, etc)

The problem is, I was never super involved in older fandoms (because I was a child who didn't know fandoms existed yet lol) and am therefore somewhat uninformed and my list of potential questions is very much incomplete for a 50 minute kahoot game

If anyone could send me asks or DMs with ideas for questions or even just ramble about topics I could include, I'd be really grateful for the help!

Fandoms I would love info on are such as:

(Putting under read more so as to not totally clog people's dashes, reblogs are appreciated btw!)

-Superwholock

-Hetalia

-danganronpa

-MLP

-Homestuck

-Voltron

-Ouran Highschool Host Club

-Warrior Cats

-Harry Potter (I know, I know, but my immortal fits into this category so I've gotta include it)

-Yugioh

-Beyblade

-TF2

-Kingdom Hearts

-Invader Zim

-Creepypasta fandom

-Rick & Morty

-Gravity Falls

-Steven Universe

-Twilight

-2017 musical fandoms (Hamilton, BMC, DEH, Heathers, etc)

-Bandom

-1D fandom

-yandere simulator

-sonic

-onceler fandom

-eddsworld

-phandom

And any sort of adjacent fandoms/medias that I haven't mentioned! Feel free to tag/add on if you have suggestions!

Ravenclaw can be a warrior cats name send tweet

Need something for youtube!!!

I'm going to do a six fanart challenge for my youtube so let me know what character you would like to see me draw!!!

I’m curious about stuff again specifically for people who like to read.

I put both girls and boys just to see if there’s a difference. And if you are trans or genderqueer please do think as to what gender you considered yourself at the age you started reading and not your current chosen gender.

psshh no worries, no stress at all. everything will be fine. just sit down for a second. right, now read a book you were obsessed with in your preteens. forget about the world. feel things again, enjoy. do it for 7 hours nonstop until you lose yourself. great.

Ok, one thing I see a lot of discussion and criticism about on Tumblr is the trope of “person who wants to fight an injustice/change the status quo for the better, who then does inexplicably bad things to show keeping the status quo is good”. And I think this is an interesting topic for analysis, but everyone seems fuzzy about what exactly the trope being complained about is, exactly. By some definitions of it, it is something that I very much hate and get annoyed by to, but by others it seems to go as far as “any story in which the people fighting the status quo are not every one of them unambiguous good guys is propaganda for the status quo”, which is a take very lacking in nuance. This is so common and so hated on the site they even made a whole tournament about it (@copaganda-clobberfest I would love you to see this post). While I love a story in which the main characters heroically fight to change oppressive norms in the world that seem unchangeable, it’s certainly not the only way you can tell a good story without having uncomfortable political subtext. In the end, I think a lot of the confusion comes from the fact that the trope being discussed is really three separate tropes that are being used interchangeably, so here is a breakdown of all three of them, whether they are inherently bad in in their implications and, if not, what framing would make them better. Ok so here we go.

Status quo-defending heroes vs. villains with a good cause

This is the “purest form” of the trope, one I think everyone can agree counts as it. In this version, the villain(s) kick the plot into motion by trying to fix an injustice or oppressive norm in their society, and the heroes fight against them to defend the status quo. To make the villain not sympathetic despite having a sympathetic cause, they either commit atrocities that aren’t logical to advance their goal or they turn out to be hypocrites who don’t really believe in the cause. 

Now, most of the time this is a bad thing in my opinion and I hate it, but even here the “badness” of it isn’t inherent to the set-up I described in itself, but is a result of how it’s usually framed. For one, the injustice is usually framed as only being relevant in the context of it being a motivation for the villains, with little input from anyone besides the villains who were affected by whatever the problem in society is. Because there is no one else besides the evil person/group who is fighting the injustice, it is then often framed as though the cruelty or hypocrisy of that person or group isn’t just an indictment on them, but on the very idea of fixing society. Like Pokemon Black and White concluding in the ending that because the revolutionary movement’s leader was a hypocrite that didn’t really care for the cause, the cause itself can be dismissed and anyone who wasn’t a hypocrite and thus dismissible was only manipulated into believing it’s a problem. Or in the worst cases, the fact that a group was excessively violent in fighting back proves that they really deserved to be outcast in the first place. I had a conversation about this with @bonefall regarding the Warriors (cat book series) arc A Vision of Shadows – basically, the rhetoric of “don’t be xenophobic towards rogues, they are just cats trying to survive” is only put into the mouth of the rogues themselves and the Clan cats duped into following them due to their disillusionment with Clan life. In the end, the rogues turn out to be horrible, and because there is no other voice of anti-xenophobia besides those portrayed negatively, the implication is not just that this group of cats are bad actors due to their actions alone, but had legitimate points in their believes. The point instead is that rogues are bad so the xenophobia was justified all along. And finally, the part of the framing where the implications of the existence of the injustice is ignored for the heroes of the story. The fact that the problem in society exists and the heroes, despite often considerable power and influence, don’t even think much about it let alone do anything to ameliorate it, does not interfere at all with them being framed as ideal heroes. If they are framed as flaws, it is not for their inaction but for unrelated things. 

To be clear, it’s these three things in the framing that make the trope bad. I don’t think that having someone professing to fight injustice either using clearly unnecessary cruelty or being a hypocrite is inherently bad or propagandistic writing. These things happen in real life! History is full of people being irrationally cruel/cruel in ways we can see with the benefit of hindsight are unjustified, including those who are trying to change the status quo. Seemingly random atrocities committed by a side of a conflict with a “good” goal absolutely do happen! This is not to say biased tellings of history and propaganda that make people changing the status quo look worse and less rational than they really are don’t exist, but the existence of propaganda doesn’t mean no such things ever happened in reality, that is getting into denialism territory. And people hypocritically claiming to fight injustice for their own personal goals is also a perfectly realistic plotline. Like Japan in World War II pointing to their region of the world being a victim of imperialism to justify their own imperialism, or any number of colonialists pointing to a genuinely morally bad practice of the people they are colonizing to justify themselves (even as they prove disingenuous by wanting to get rid of anything that is too unlike their own culture). And yes, sometimes such “bad actors” end up becoming the leaders and people with the most powers to enact change in society out of all the people with similar goals (though unlike in some of this fiction, that doesn’t mean that other people opposed to the injustice just stop existing). Deprived of the problematic framing, these stories can actually be interesting. What do you do if you are the resident of a fictional state that has a cruel aspect of it you are trying to fight against, but it so happens that the state that colonized yours used abolishing that practice as one of their justifications for imperialism and doing many horrible things? How do you fight that aspect of your society without being labeled as the same as the colonizers? T(I remember an article I read in a sociology class I took about social movements about just this that really stuck with me, contrasting the abolition of foot bonding with the persistence of female genital mutilation and how Christian missionaries and colonialism played into both). That could be a much more interesting setup than just having the villains being the only ones who point out the problem with a society. 

And just as another note, while I do think that sometimes this sort of plot is intentionally motivated by trying to discredit the belief of the story’s villains (like the Pokemon example I gave earlier, which I definitely think was written to address criticisms of the franchise but using a trick to not fairly address them), but I think more often it’s just a result of unthinkingly plugging into a “standard formula” of heroes and villains for a story. Someone starts out with the assumption that heroes protect their society and world from threats, and then they have to create a threat that will be a villain. But they think sympathetic villains make the story more interesting and more realistic than just evil ones, so they give the villain a sympathetic cause. However, since they only thought of the problem with society in the context of a villain motive, the problem with society is divorced from the rest of the story, the logical implications are never followed through on; heroes never think about the injustice outside the context of the villain, and are not portrayed as flawed for it, side characters might have a passingly negative opinion of the injustice at worst and are never seen actively fighting it parallel to the villains. The authors will then either not realize the characters in the plug n’ play hero and villain story they created don’t really correspond to their roles and create a story where the moral framework is completely wrong, or realize and “course correct” by making the villain do something out of character. In general, I feel this is why it is best to develop your cast as characters first, and then once you have the story and characters and motivations much more, start thinking about who, if anyone, you would “side with”, and who, if anyone, could be labeled “heroic” or “villainous”. Deciding “good guys and bad guys” before you develop them as characters can lead to all sorts of issues of the moral framing not matching the characters’ actions.

I will also note that there are some versions of this trope where the heroes do, in fact, even after a story they spend fighting for the status quo, recognize the villain’s point and try to implement the changes they wanted at the end, i.e the Black Panther movie. While this avoids the framing problems I outlined above, I get why this is disliked as well – it seems to give a message that it’s ok to repress the people who are actually putting their whole lives into advocating for change, and trust the people in power who never before showed any interest in fighting injustice to have a change of heart and reform things. A “fix” for this kind of plot would be probably be including characters who are dedicated and going to great lengths to achieve the change and are not portrayed as villains (even if they have less power to influence things than the villains), rather than having the heroes who were never invested in change in the first place be the only ones.

Villains fight for the status quo, but negatively portrayed anti status-quo characters also exist

This trope is less often bad for a story in my opinion than the first one, but nonetheless there are some framings of it that can have uncomfortable implications. In this, the main villains are fighting to keep the status quo, and the heroic main characters are either trying to fight them or a neutral third party. However, characters fighting the status quo who are portrayed as overly cruel or hypocritical also exist. On the face of it, there is nothing wrong with this – wouldn’t it be naïve to assume that no one fighting for a good cause would ever do anything wrong? But there are three ways this can be portrayed badly (if a story avoids all three I think this is a completely fine setup for a story.

The first is the “both sides are equally bad” framing. This usually involves a neutral hero. In this version, the oppressed and oppressor sides are portrayed as exactly symmetrical, paralleled with each other, and shown as equally bad in every way. The issue with this is again, not in the actions of the side fighting the status quo (like I said it’s perfectly realistic for such people to be unnecessarily extreme in violence), but in the framing that ignores the fact that, by virtue of one side having all the power and the other side reacting to that, it is inherently not a symmetrical conflict. While I agree that this is a bad framing, I do think people are still overly harsh on framings like this due to the primarily American userbase of sites like this, which leads to fictional conflicts always being assumed to be specifically metaphors for American groups or groups that are familiar to the average American audience member. Often, if a story shows members of a group to which bigotry/hate crimes/genocide is committed against to have been in power at some point and done bad things to their current oppressor when they were in power, it is decried as propaganda because the most well-known-to-Americans cases, African-Americans in the US and Jewish people in the Holocaust, were never at any point in power, so therefore the stories are either interpreted as saying one of these two groups is responsible for their own oppression or that, if one was to grant that group equality, they would respond with oppression and genocide towards their former oppressors. But I don’t think these stories are inherently problematic because not every story is a metaphor for things familiar to Americans! There are situations in history that do resemble what I just described (members of a group in power do something bad with that power, and that’s later used as an excuse for bigoted actions by another group), it’s not unrealistic to happen just because that isn’t what happened in the USA.

The second is the “political people are dangerous” framing. In this case, though both heroes and villains fight the status quo, (which again, isn’t inherently bad), but consistently anyone with a defined political motivation falls on the villain side, while heroes are plodding around fighting vaguely for personal revenge or something vague. This article https://newsocialist.org.uk/outlaw-kings-rebel-chic/ explains better than I can just what is wrong with that framing, but suffice it to say that it’s always seemed completely backwards to me; in an imagined revolution, I would feel far more comfortable trusting someone who was defined goals of the system they want to put in the old system’s place than someone who just wants to smash the bad guy and get revenge, who knows what happens afterward.

The third is the “absurdly high standards for going too far” framing. This is where there are both heroic and villainous characters fighting the status quo, but the standards of ethical conduct for who is framed as villainous are unfairly weighted against those fighting the status quo. For example, not just people who go above and beyond in their cruelty are condemned, but anyone who uses violence in any context. The standards are so high here that it makes it seem impossible for a character to do anything to react to their horrible circumstances that would be effectual at all without being condemned as a villain. For example, in the third Wings of Fire arc, where the narrative seems to focus more on how you should only kill the leaders of the oppressive HiveWings and trying to understand and empathize with them than the actual act of stopping the injustice, and despite this focus on targeting the leaders still treated a group being threatened with genocide trying to use mind control on the leader of the group alone to prevent said genocide as making a horrible mistake they had to atone for. Or, even if the status quo fighters are extreme in their cruelty and should be framed as wrong, they are also framed as one-dimensional, unsympathetic monsters, often while the actual oppressors are afforded nuance and sympathy. I think this is also what people’s issue with Avatar the Last Airbender is – in spite of the main plot being the heroes trying to overthrow an oppressive empire’s status quo, and the two negatively-portrayed rebels genuinely harming civilians unnecessarily, Hama is portrayed as wrong not just for hurting civilians but for using bloodbending itself (even to free herself from prison), and Jet Li is portrayed less sympathetically than similarly traumatized and wronged teenagers fighting for the main villains. Now this isn’t a condemnation of any nonviolent movement being portrayed positively – I think a very good story could be made out of the struggles, failures and successes of a nonviolent, but disruptive and far from passive, movement in a realistic world. Most of the hate for pacifist characters seems to come from not the pacifism itself but the use of deus ex machina and contrived circumstances in their worlds to make sure they always win and never have to make compromises (i.e criticism of Steven Universe, Undertale, or Avatar the Last Airbender again). 

Villains disrupt status quo, but villains’ goal is worse than status quo

I sometimes see these types of stories get lumped in with the other two tropes in blanket discussions of the tendency for stories to frame fighting the status quo as bad. This is when the story does fit the formula of “heroes defend status quo, villains fight it”, but the villains are not fighting for an ideal that would be good and noble, were they not murdering tons of people or being hypocritical about it. No, here everyone agrees their goal would be worse than the status quo. They want to take over the world and enslave everyone, or destroy the whole world, or sometimes they are fantasy fascists who take the preexisting bigotry in the setting to extremes rather than aiming to fight it. 

Now, there is totally a place for stories like this in the world, and I often enjoy them as much as stories about changing the world for the better; sometimes it’s good to hear a story about finding good things that already exist in the world, seeing they are worth protecting, and fighting for them. But sometimes these stories can fall into one of the same traps as the first trope. Not the parts about the villains being the only context in which fighting an injustice is brought up, since in this case the villains aren’t fighting an injustice. But the part about an injustice existing in the world, and the heroes solely being focused on fighting the villain and not fighting the injustice to the point that it seems they are callous and accepting of that injustice, and yet they are not framed as flawed and wrong for it. The world they are protecting is flawed, and yet these supposed paragons care only for the protecting and not for the fixing, even though the protecting is certainly something good that has to be done. This is the problem that Harry Potter (whose villains fall nicely into the “fantasy fascist” category I mentioned earlier) falls into. 

So does avoiding this mean that, if you want to write a story about protecting something good in the world, you have to make your setting a utopia? I really don’t think so. You can definitely write a story where the main characters’ main goal is fighting the existential threat to their society/world because that’s the emergency happening right now, but clearly also make an effort to fix the problems with their society. But another interesting thing you could do is writing the “problematic” framing but purposefully. The heroes fighting the horrible threat to the world are uncaring, or at least not as caring as they should be, about the injustices of their society, and this is framed deliberately as a flaw on their part. They might have many virtues and lovable traits, and you root for them because they are fighting something far worse and they are justified in doing that, but they are also intentionally very flawed people in their outlook. Add in characters who are part of a group being oppressed by that society, and the choice they have to make between fighting the threat because it must be fought, but for the sake of a society that will be ungrateful and never care about their contribution and keep being horrible, or resigning from it all in protest to keep their principles but thus neglecting to stand against something monstrous. There are just so many interesting and not problematic ways to frame a story beyond “everyone fighting the status quo is good, everyone supporting it is bad!” Even though, as I said, I love stories like that and I’d love to see more of them.

Guys I’ve been stuck in my tf2 hyperfixion for three years, help

I need a new fandom before I actually go insane 😔

Any suggestions that aren’t fnaf, MHA, Harry Potter, undertale, tf2 (freaks) , DHMIS, fairytail, assassination classroom and WARRIOR(s)(cats) or Genshin, that also includes WoF (also black butler and dogman)

Btw these are all fandoms I’ve hyperfixed on for a few months in the past. Tf2 being the longest. So help me 😔

The Library of Alexandria (i.e. Fanfiction.net) seems to be burning RIGHT NOW. As in, pages that existed an hour ago have disappeared. As of right now, the main pages for Supernatural and Warriors have blanked out. The crossover pages for Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Harry Potter, and A Song of Ice and Fire as well. The main crossover pages for books and TV stopped working for several hours (though they seem to be back for now). I’ve heard of random chapters missing from things too. Apparently alerts died last week.

I’d heard vague rumors about Fanfiction.net dying at some point, but I (like many people, I presume) procrastinated actually doing something about it. Unlike ao3, there isn’t a nice download button for anything except your own fics (and even then, things get downloaded as .html files).

Don’t procrastinate anymore. Save your own fics, save all your favorited fics, save every fic you can.

justice for Crookshanks

I've just finished re-read of Prisoner of Azkaban and I've gotta say, Hermione's cat is goals and movies robbed him so much

Get to know you questions!! Tag whoever you like :D

Writing my answers in orange!

1) top 5 or top 10 favorite animals (depending on how many animals you like)

Hermit Crabs, Pigeons, Otters, Anglerfish, Shrimp, Cats, Manned Wolves, Salamander, Sheep, Axolotls :D

2) top 3 Minecraft mobs

Mooshroom, chicken, and parrot!!!

3) favorite vocaloid song or My Singing Monsters island theme and why! (If you don’t like/know Vocaloid/MSM, just name a song or genre you like and why :D)

Fav Vocaloid song is Brain Explosion girl recently, and fav MSM theme HAS to be cold island. Or maybe earth???? Hm

4) favorite and least favorite textures, no why needed :333

Fav is squishy soft things, least favorite is ice in a freezer

5) not your favorite color, but your favorite color palette (bonus points if you have a pic of the specific palette or a photo/artwork of the pallet you like!!)

Purple, Green, Orange, Pink, and Black! Total Halloween vibes!!

6) fav book you had to read for school (fiction or non fiction work lol, and if you don’t like/have any then just name a book or fanfic you like!)

Of Mice and Men was surprisingly amazing! Thought I’d hate it tbh

7) how do you think of the months of the year in your head? Left to right, top to bottom, in specific numbered rows and columns? Tell me :D

I think of it like this:

January, February, March, April

May, June, July, August

September, October, November, December

8) assigned harry potter/ilvermorny house or Percy Jackson cabin or Warrior cats clan something like that lol (if you don’t have anything like that, star sign works too!)

I’ll do em all lol: Slytherin/Hufflepuff, Pukwudgie, Dionysus’s, RiverClan, I’m an Aries sun/gemini rising/pisces moon :D

9) MBTI???? Love those things :33 (If you haven’t taken the test yet or u just don’t wanna cuz it’s too long, are you a solider poet or king?)

I’m an ENFP-T! I thought I’d get king but I got poet lol

10) something “cringe” you actually rly like, no shame here :D

Gacha Life/Club, the styles just so cutesy! Ohhh also K-Pop, I’m a TOTAL stay :33 and DSMP, it’s just rly cool to me

11) characters from shows/movies/games you kin/stan/just adore!! NOT ACCEPTING IRL PPL PLZ AND THANK U :D (unless it’s urself, we like self love in these parts)

For me I currently kin Dazai, Edward Elric, c!TommyInnit, and I completely STAN any Project Sekai character. I mean any of them.

12) 5 people you’d wanna be at a party with and why! (Can be alive or dead, real or fake, celebrities or randos, humans or otherwise :D)

My grandpa to see him again, Roy mustang to see if he’s a bastard irl, Hachi/Kenshi Yonezu just to see how he’s doing, Kanye West to just ask him why, and BeastChild (the YouTuber) just cause I really like his stuff and would wanna meet him!

13) favorite hobby/fandom specific term and its meaning :333

I’m a writer (well, aspiring anyway, I’m not rly that good) and I love the idea of the sexy lamp. Basically if you’re writing a female character that could be replaced with a sexy lampshade and nothing about the story changes then you’re writing a BAD FEMALE CHARACTER XD

Cause it’s spooky season il leave it at 13 ;)

Happy answering!!!

No pressure tags :3 @touratoura @theancientwonder @kneecoal-mooma @citrushomie @skytheamazing @mitski-slope @a-trench-coat-of-confused-worms @dicklesswonder-blog @vicaridoo

Hey ya folks!! Could you please join or reblog??

We’re looking to create a safe environment and community for all kinds of people!!

All the fandoms are in the tags!