No Joke for James for the episode asks?
This one has always been an anti-favorite of mine tbh.
Oy! Don't judge me >:-|
It starts off strong enough, though part of the problem is that it's two stories smushed into one episode (literally—two stories from the mags).
Given how short and underdeveloped most of the mag stories are, you'd think this would be a good idea when adapting them. It's not, though, and this episode is a great testament as to why. It's precisely because they're so short and underdeveloped that the TV adaptations—especially in the 5-minute Classic Era!—should have taken their time, padded them out a little. Most of the mag plots have rather interesting ideas. They're just told too baldly, and there's no commitment to building the atmosphere. That's exactly the sort of thing Allcroft and Mitton were great at rectifying and I'm at a loss as to why they did not do it in these cases.
Anyway, getting down to brass tacks. The ep starts off strong—James doing his peacock thing, Gordon all-too-easily stomping on his worst insecurities, and James pinching his express in order to show him up. This meets the dual prereqs of being the perfect way to develop their characters while also supplying a cracking plot.
As I've said more than once, I'm not wild about Thomas having fallen for James's lies twice in one season (or about Thomas apparently having nothing better to do than to be shunting trains out of Tidmouth twice in one season). But if it had just been this one time, I wouldn't be so bothered. Thomas shows skepticism here (his driver overrides him) so it's in-character. What's not in character is then several stories later again taking James's bait, this time with no resistance at all, but I can't hold that against this story, so fine.
So everything's pretty much okay until after James is caught out and sent to "stay in your shed until you are wanted!" (Classic sort of line, of course. Fine. Good good.) This blatant defiance seems like it should indeed be a pretty big deal, but evidently... he's grounded until? like? the next morning?
But if that were all, I'd just be nitpicking. It's not, though. The scene where Gordon and Henry are razing James in the sheds is surprisingly cringey. I can't even bring myself to type what passes for Henry's "roast." It's even worse than the notorious time Awdry, who had yet to discover the art, had the engines "tease" Thomas by saying "Look! There's Thomas, who wanted to pull a train, but forgot about the coaches!" Awdry had the excuse of it being, like, the fifth story he'd ever written in his life. He was a newb when he wrote that. But this is season 3 of a hit TV series run by seasoned professionals?? Help??? We need zingers here, guys. REAL zingers. (This seems like an ongoing problem with the magazine stories. Did they ever have a good roast? Where is the "You're too fat; you need exercise"? The "I only wish I'd thought of those names myself. If the dome fits—!"?? The "You're the only danger on the rails, Thomas"??? This series lives and dies by good roasts. Actually, that's the best pro-Enterprising Engines argument—there are zingers, which I confess Duke the Lost Engine sorely lacks.)
Right. I know I sound kvetchy, but it only gets worse from here. The second "half" is so stupid. James is let out and put on his least favourite work, which he turns a wheel to gamely in an effort to redeem himself. Fine. But there are a couple of problems.
One: Thomas forgives him sooooo easily. (Where is "Here are your trucks, James! Have you got some bootlaces?") Where's the schadenfreude, Thom? Where's your backbone?
Two: James continues to redeem himself soooooo easily. In the most blatant, convenient, lazy deus ex machina... an inspector appears, and needs a ride to get to STH. James gives him said ride and every authority figure in sight fawns over him.
What the actual hell am I watching?
That the inspector is the Jeremiah Jobling figurine is pretty funny, but it doesn't redeem that this whole "plotline" is lazy and STH's approval at the end is earned way too easily.
Like, I like that Brenner (who I often ride pretty hard) is trying to go for the classic early-RWS vibe with James, the one where he flies too high, gets shot down, and claws his way back up again—reactive and fragile but determined and triumphant. He's often said James is his favorite and his magazine stories as well as his later CGI-era seasons bear this out. He gets James on a much deeper level than most writers.
But the pacing here sucks. (Which might not be Brenner's fault—again, he wasn't involved with the show at this point, unless you count his uncredited stories being adapted.) It's important to let James really splash around in the slough of despond for a bit; this zipped by too fast. And then, his triumph has to be a triumph—not just "yyyyoooo, mr hatt! i did my actual, assigned jobs competently for one (1) day. bitch!"
There is clearly a callback here to James's redemption after the bootlace story, but back then he notably had to do excellent work for a while until he got his day in the sun.
Anyway, yeah. Season 1 did James's emotional life so well that nothing else will ever touch it, I guess.
And STH's final line always made me cringe. Even as a little kid, I could tell it was already cliche.
But. All this said. The episode is not without its merits. In particular, the relationship between James and his driver here is wonderful. Bonus for the relationship between Thomas and his driver, and Gordon and his driver. It was a good episode for the driver relationship, I guess.
Also, even my cold, cold heart isn't immune to the bit with James "bustling about [at the harbour] all day."
The writing may suck, but despite how poorly he is set up by the episode James is still shines in this one, undeniably lovable.
There are few stories or episodes ever that have nailed his character and also let we the reader/viewer just love on him so much. So, despite the editor in me wanting to cry and have a strong drink, I do understand why it's way more popular among fans than it deserves strictly on its technical merits. I just wish that, at minimum, they'd let this be a duology instead of frankensteining the two stories into one rush job.
(And that someone had fixed that dialogue at the end! Geez!)
Let's end on a delightful lil find I made on the TTTE Wiki gallery:
... classic James.
17 notes
·
View notes
Remus opened his letter, surprised when it appeared to be a howler. The last time he’d heard one was the day before Sirius got disowned back in 5th year.
He was in the dining hall for breakfast, sitting at the staff table. He watched as Harry and Hermione plotted, looking anxious. He blew it off, as it seemed Harry was always weary.
“A howler,” Snape sneered from beside him.
“Astute observation, Severus.” Remus told him, nodding at him.
Remus disregarded Snape, and focused on the howler. There was no name on it, so it was possible it was from a student playing a prank. In good nature, for the prankingnostalgia, Remus opened it.
There was silence for a moment before a loud, booming voice started to yell. “DARLINGGGGG, GUESS WHOS BACK FROM JAIL” And it was his Sirius Black. And he knew they would find each other again.
5K notes
·
View notes