#not flagpost
Text
I get the times arent evenly spaced just pick the one thats closest to your experience. also reblog if you vote so I get a larger sample?
#kiru polls#not flagpost#adhd#hyperfixation#actually adhd#neurodivergent#adhd things#adhd problems#adhd brain#neurodivergence#neurodiversity#neurodiverse stuff#hyperfixiating
879 notes
·
View notes
Text
okay tbh honest thoughts on vriska
she's awful, but realistically all trolls are. theyre a violent species who live on a violent planet, within alternia's own morals shes just being silly, so I dont think its fair to judge her within human laws or morals
I just say I hate her because I think it's funny and also people ship her with terezi who I had and might still have a massive crush on
0 notes
Text
Kontextmaschine is Dead
(~1,000 words, 5m)
Noted blogger @kontextmaschine is presumed dead, following the discovery that the sole resident at his most likely residence was found deceased during a wellness check initiated by concerned Redditors.
Prior to his last post on Aug 22, which indicated a serious health problem, he reported taking over twice the dose of creatine he had been taking at the beginning of his lengthy post-COVID health saga, in which he also reported becoming bisexual, having "zero" anxiety, gaining 3D vision after years of not having it, becoming incredibly convincing, and having to learn to walk and use his muscles properly again. At the time, he felt he was becoming trimmer and physically stronger, and reported engaging in a long project of yard work, although photos from the inside of his house generally looked somewhat messy.
A Tumblr user who met him briefly in person after the beginning of the health saga but before these most recent events reported that he was friendly, charismatic, hospitable, and clean, but "physically, a mess," with motor control issues on one side of his body.
Topics of discussion were similar to the content of kontextmaschine's blog, such as differences in east and west coast government in America, said to be "totally on brand," but it was said that the prolific poster seemed "less self-grandiose" in person.
Redditors theorize that the decline of kontextmaschine's health following his first self-report of COVID-19 infection may have been due to undiagnosed brain cancer, which could be more consistent with observed changes in behavior than the after-effects of a viral infection, given that most reports of "long covid" are about effects like fatigue, and not total loss of anxiety or alteration of sexual orientation.
Despite multiple suggestions, from both anonymous and pseudonymous users, kontextmaschine refused to seek professional medical care for his condition.
Regarding the mourning of public figures, in 2018, a period of increased Progressive sensitivity during the Trump Administration, kontextmaschine wrote,
through the years realized that through whatever blind groping the ‘90s-ass “edgelords” were desperately trying to save us from this, through proper gatekeeping and filtering
at first I’d thought it was gratuitous and supported it being relaxed, maybe not shaming everyone who publicly mourned a suicide, mea culpa, mea culpa, I have debts to pay
In 2019, he added:
That was how we kept the internet culture from growing mawkish and cry-bullyish: basically, if you were so weak as to get weepy over corpsemeat you got cancelled, the shame would follow you forever and you’d never be allowed to forget it.
Given his writing, it is likely that kontextmaschine would not have supported excessive public mourning over his death, though in 2017, following the theft of his motorcycle, when the popular blogger @argumate jokingly criticized him by writing, "no references to pinball, no insight into historical Americana, this isn’t the kontext I signed up for," kontextmaschine wrote,
“when bad shit happens people mock me accurately” is the community I’ve been looking for my whole life so
Like argumate, perhaps the most famous of the rationalist-adjacent bloggers on Tumblr, screenshots of kontextmaschine's Tumblr posts would end up on outside websites.
Kontextmaschine was generally considered an interesting, if controversial writer. One Tumblr user characterized him as a member of the "obnoxious Tumblr right," though another user asked, "wait, how is kontextmaschine is right wing?" After another user claimed that the nuclear bombing of Oregon would be a net improvement in the world due to kontextmaschine's residence in Portland, tumblr user @random-thought-depository wrote a 2,400 word theory post arguing that kontextmaschine's philosophy was a means to coordinate to join a future political coalition favoring the formation of a more brutal and oppressive hierarchy in pursuit of his own advantage.
Though kontextmaschine's ideology advocates that humanity should adopt "r-selection," meaning more offspring with less investment in each (or youth, sex, and death), this blog dissented against the coalition theory, arguing that motorcycles, kung fu, women, Hollywood, and not having to report to HR are all traditionally cool, and the causality of the kontextmaschine ideology could easily run the other way.
Though he had a period of identifying as female in his youth, appropriately LGBTQ for a Tumblr user, his 2011 statement of principles, including "the lesser yields to the greater" and "suffering is the mark of a wrong person," and general body of work, could be described as a strain of right-wing thought, though not of the traditionalist Christian or rational technocratic varieties.
Prior to the post-covid health saga, kontextmaschine's health posting was primarily about his bipolar disorder, with both manic and depressive phases.
Kontextmaschine maintained generally friendly relations with other bloggers in his sphere of discourse, sometimes debating but rarely aggressive, except in response to anonymous hatemail. In response to one particular piece of hatemail, kontextmaschine stated that as a writer, of course his primary form of influence would be his posts.
In a post chain reblogged by dozens of Tumblr users, multiple Tumblr users wrote that they enjoyed his writing and are disappointed by his death, describing him as a unique thinker that will not be easily replaced. Several felt that there was not much they could have done, as after returning from his covid infection, he was not taking medical advice.
One Tumblr user wrote, "rip. Inspirational manic poster," while long-time and prolific poster argumate described him as, "one of the bloggers of all time."
Internet users speculate that Kontextmaschine is survived by his outdoor cat, Badger, about whom he posted frequently. He may also be survived by other members of his family, with whom he apparently did not live, and rarely spoke about.
It is recommended that enthusiasts of kontextmaschine's blog make backups of his writing for archival purposes.
770 notes
·
View notes
Text
i hate the american flag. its like if a regular flag had a youtuber reaction in the corner.
#flagposting#american flag#i live in the uk and like#ours isnt a GOOD flag#but i def hate the american flag more#get that markiplier shit off the flag
33 notes
·
View notes
Text
anne faulkner genderfluid flag <3
#sorry for flagposting they live in my head#they pay rent tho unlike some ppl#anne faulkner#paradox live#bae#pride flag#genderfluid#color picked flags#oh. so many ppl have done this but idc
21 notes
·
View notes
Text
i haven’t been posting about it here out of respect for my lovely mutuals who would absolutely block me if i shared all my inane thoughts daily but im not afraid to go on main and say that i believe season 2 of our flag means death should open in media res with izzy hands & blackbeard fucking raw
136 notes
·
View notes
Text
youtube
#this alone puts Hedon near the top of the list of doom likes#and the fact that this game beat Ultrakill to the gay sex flagpost
1 note
·
View note
Text
Other than being my 4 months on t-versary it is also now a year since I got my first tattoo so here's a little tattoo tour (when they were freshly healed to now) I have by March 23 2023 :3
First: Flapjack with a brush on my shoulder as a tribute to my grandmother; design by @isi-daddy and tattooed by Christine (craycrayink) from AmazeInk by March 23 2023 (1 year ago)
Second: Norse rune on the inside of my lower arm to symbolize my heritage, love for mythology, queer identity, autistic identity and as a souvenir from Berlin and to remember the Käärijä europe tour 2023 (where I went to two shows being Stockholm and Berlin); tattooed by Carina Kuntzsch (the.psychedelic.unicorn) from Mayduna Tattoo and Piercing by October 18 2023 (5 months ago)
Third: Flagpost with 'Ihan Sama' shirt as a flag on the side of my stomach inspired by the Käärijä song Paidaton RIehuja; tattooed by Emilie (yours_truly_tattoo) from Sort Kat Tattoo by January 9 2024 (2,5 months ago)
Fourth: Bee on my right wrist to remember the Joker Out See You Soon tour where I participated in four shows (Helsinki 1+2, Malmö and Göteborg); tattooed by Barbara (barbaras_blaek) from Barbaras Blæk Tattoo Studio by March 22 2024 (1 day ago)
#I hope you enjoy this little tour :3#tried to keep it short#tattoos#body modifications tattoo#mine#me#micahs foolery
14 notes
·
View notes
Text
can we stop the belief that terfs hate transfems exclusively or like more than they hate cisgender men or transmascs and pretending it's just the trans women's battle against them and you're allies for them or whatever. this literally undermines how much harm theyre doing both to the trans community as a whole and even to the people (cis women) they claim to be protecting. terfs hate trans men just as much as trans women, transmascs arent safe because terfs view them as "uwu confused girlies trying to escape oppression", that is a very narrow worldview and inherently transphobic itself (it excludes butches, transmascs who's medically transitioned, intersex people, etc. etc.)
transfems arent more oppressed by terfs than any other people theyre oppressing, please understand this. Im so sick and tired of people undermining my transmasc siblings when it comes to harassment from terfs because "well you arent a target to them", why are they harassing them then????
I just geniuenly dont like how the queer community can claim to be transmasc friendly and then view transmascs the same way transphobes view them (again, uwu girlies who are tricked into ruining their feminine beauty, they dont know anything and how lucky they are). feels both andromisic and misogynistic at the same time on top of transmisic idk how the fuck you manage to fuck up that badly
tldr: stop pretending transmascs arent affected by terfs nearly as much as transfems
anyone can reblog, except terfs of course they can fuck off
transfem is used as a way to refer to "TMA"/"AMAB" trans people
transmasc is used as a way to refer to "TME"/"AFAB" trans people
I know the definition is a bit more fluid now so I just wanted to note that
#not flagpost#discourse cw#transfem#trans rights#trans discourse#trans discussion#trans discrimination#trans#transgender#transmasc#anti radfem#transsexual#trans community#lgbt#lgbtq#lgbtqia#lgbt discourse#lgbtq community#queer community#lgbt representation
2K notes
·
View notes
Note
what do your different tags mean?
#tattletxt is just my default tag for my posts. #nsft text is for stuff that's nsfw. #thought cabinet is for passages or quotes from books/articles i find interesting and want to revisit. #hieroglyphic every particle is my poetry tag. #vexillology is for flagposting and #ttrpg is for tabletop roleplaying game posting. oh and #nicey ask :) is for asks where people are nice to me which are nice to look back on sometimes. otherwise i just tag a lot of fandom stuff (#worm, #the locked tomb, #disco elysium.) sometimes i tag discourse and long posts buit i'm very inconsistent about that. i usually tag ask memes #ask meme. or #ask game. i think that's about it
40 notes
·
View notes
Note
I've been mentally categorizing you as a pretty clean example of the 'new right'; editorializing with 'extreme' feels like it's giving more heat than light but w/e. It's very clear in the associative sense (you hang out with people on the right), in the stylistic sense (your writing is easy to match with the Moldbug, Land, ZHPL cluster), and in the operational sense (you critique the left primarily and the right only parenthetically).
And like, at the end of the day, your overriding issue of concern is to codify racial differences as beyond the scope of policy intervention. Whatever else you want it to be, that project is and always has been a keystone of the right's ideological basis and coalition-building.
When I was a child, in the year 2000, the Human Genome Project took 13 years and cost $2.7 billion just to sequence the human genome. Now that costs less than $1,000. Genetic engineering was science fiction.
In 2017, the FDA approved the first commercial gene therapy, Kymriah. It costs $475,000. If monogenic gene therapy costs $500,000 in 2020 and declines in cost by half every 5 years, then by 2035 it costs $62,500, and by 2050 it will cost around $7,800.
I recently posted a criticism of Hitler, and I'll bring up part of it because it's relevant here - Hitler apparently thought the world was going to be consumed by Malthusian total war, and that the only thing to do was to win. However, in many developed countries the fertility rate has been below replacement since around 1973, or for about fifty years as of 2024.
World War 2 started in 1939. Hitler killed millions of people. 1973 was a mere 34 years away.
The BAPism cluster is implicitly based on the biocapital meltdown theory. Its logical conclusion would be a return to pre-industrial mortality rates. In terms of actual science, at least one researcher said that it's a mystery how mutational load hasn't killed us 10 times over already - that amount of uncertainty is not a sound foundation for radical policy.
The Social Justice cluster are based on a theory of social causes, but their social approach doesn't work and the social interventions we do have are relatively weak and tend to fade out. Despite this, they want a system of formal racial benefits and penalties throughout all of society, and prefer to use one particular race as their moral dumping ground for all problems. They're the kind of people that would sabotage hiring for air traffic controllers.
Neither philosophy is based on a realistic assessment of the situation. Both are based on despair over genetic fatalism.
I'll go over 4 possible future cases, the relationship between the Rationalists and what you call the "New Right," and some of what I think will happen to the coalitions in 10-20 years.. (Total post is ~2,600 words.)
And like, at the end of the day, your overriding issue of concern is to codify racial differences as beyond the scope of policy intervention. Whatever else you want it to be, that project is and always has been a keystone of the right's ideological basis and coalition-building.
We already paid the staggering oppression setup costs for the 2008 world system. It's a sunk cost. Now is not a good time to engage in a radical political program involving much higher oppression, suffering, or material costs on the basis of very limited evidence.
Let's talk about the possibilities. When it comes to the things people complain about, there are basically three possibilities: { mostly_genetic, partly_genetic, barely_genetic } As for the genetics industry, we can treat it as having two possibilities: { improvement, stasis }
Genes and the environment are not actually independent. I work based on a theory of compounding capability. Someone with a higher ability can take better advantage of positive events ("positive shocks," such as a scholarship or inheritance), and has more options to mitigate the downsides of negative events ("negative shocks," such as a fire or illness).
Someone's genes influence the environment which they create around themselves, and the environment influences just what they can accomplish with those genes.
So we can actually collapse the first set of possibilities into just two: { partly_genetic, barely_genetic }. We can basically break the situation down into four cases.
(barely_genetic, stasis): It turns out that the genetics industry is a one-trick pony and can only cure a few terrible genetic diseases, and for no cheaper than $500,000 a pop. However, this is a different situation than the one we're in now. Currently, we have about 50 years of social interventions with relatively little to show for it. If in 2050, the genetics industry can only influence (and predict) some very narrow/minor stuff, then we'll have 30 years of mucking about with genetics with relatively little to show for it. At that time, it would be more reasonable to consider radical politics. (Though actually effective radical policy might look quite different from what contemporary progressives would imagine.)
(partly_genetic, stasis): In this scenario, it turns out that the genetics industry is not that bad at predicting things using genetics, but actually influencing them proves much more difficult for some reason. This seems like a rather unlikely combination, but was one of the sources of fear of genetics in the 90s and '00s - genetics could only show you someone's doom, and thus couldn't save anyone, only be used as a rationalization to leave some people to suffer and die.
By now, some of you have probably realized what the joke behind the #librx posts is. Just because we're in such an incredibly inconvenient scenario doesn't mean we need to let BAP deploy bodybuilder death squads that hunt fat people for sport. Both the bloodgild (vampire prison), and admitting college students based on their test scores per calorie, are fairly ridiculous policies. But if we take reactionary assumptions about underlying conditions, that doesn't necessarily mean we can't create more soft-touch policies than reactionaries would prefer.
(barely_genetic, improvement): This is not far from the scenario envisioned by sterile, party-line New York Times Futurism. In this scenario, the genetics industry enables us to cure a variety of health problems, but shows little ability to influence the things that people complain about.
From a policy development perspective, this puts us in an improved position compared to where we are right now. A powerful ability to manipulate genetics makes it much easier to determine what is not genetic, and thus makes it easier to narrow our search for successful social policy.
(partly_genetic, improvement): This is a new era. Three things.
1 - If genes are significant driver of performance, then the ability to alter genes allows us to use money to buy increased performance. This means that resource transfers are single-round and possibly even a net economic investment, and not just a moral or political benefit we're buying with our economic surplus.
Right now our means to convert money into performance are limited.
2 - Due to compounding capabilities, if genes drive performance, and we can alter genes, then this frees up potential for success with social policy. Suppose someone is a drug addict who has a genetic propensity for drug addiction. (This is a made-up example.) If the biological risk of drug addiction is changed (and this is a big if), then the ability of a rehab program to not only get this guy off of drugs, but keep him off of drugs, is improved.
3 - One of the primary arguments for cruel right-wing policy is conservation of scarce genetic capital. This does not completely eliminate such arguments, because it's necessary to retain a corps of personnel to maintain the necessary biomedical equipment, and to maintain a society that can continue to field this industry. However, such arguments are dramatically reduced in scope, and shifted towards things like reproductive alignment, prevention of excessive reliance on capital-intensive systems of reproduction, and other future bioconservatism.
This scenario is likely to introduce all sorts of new problems, including a new ideological mania where people insist that society has to be perfect, so natural reproduction must be outlawed and some genes must be made illegal. (Maintaining human freedom in this new high-energy, high-capital equilibrium will require new ideological development.)
It's very clear in the associative sense (you hang out with people on the right), in the stylistic sense (your writing is easy to match with the Moldbug, Land, ZHPL cluster), and in the operational sense (you critique the left primarily and the right only parenthetically).
The position of Scott Alexander circa 2013-2014 was that the current rate of gene burn does not constitute an emergency as technology is likely to change the game within 100 years, and that biological causes (in general) are not frightening because they seem likely to be easier to deal with than social causes. In 2017, he argued that people shouldn't worry too much about their personal aptitude test scores.
Mitigatedchaos is to the right of the median capital-R Rationalist - most of them are committed to the Democratic Party, and quite a few here wouldn't agree with my opinions on polyamory or borders. Mitigatedchaos has an overall more conservative portfolio than the typical 2014 rationalist on a number of metrics, including on bioconservatism ("reproductive alignment" being one example).
(A 2014 Rationalist, of course, would find describing beliefs as a "portfolio" (along with other investment terms) to be quite intuitive.)
Nonetheless, stalling for time until the genetics industry comes online is one of the positions that is mainstream within the rationalists.
What do Mencius Moldbug, Nick Land, and Zero HP Lovecraft all have in common? Imagination.
Take technology. Change it. Does that change other aspects of society?
If you are Ted Chiang of the New York Times, this is inconceivable to you. The Democratic Party has a position and a coalition right now, therefore the Democratic Party will have that same position and coalition forever. The work of futurism is merely to tell readers of the New York Times that they will believe the same things in 2050 that they believe right now.
What do Robin Hanson, Scott Alexander, Mencius Moldbug, Nick Land, and Zero HP Lovecraft all have in common?
They have a tendency to view the world in terms of dynamic systems (rather than static ones) and evolutionary dynamics. This is the kind of person who can think of an organization becoming misaligned, or organizational linkage limits, or limitations resulting from information processing and transmission. Or think of "coordination problems" as their own thing. You know, like in Meditations on Moloch.
With a few exceptions, the left coalition haven't done much interesting ideological work since the second term of the Obama Administration. It's largely conflict theorist stuff for winning interpersonal and institutional conflicts, shutting down criticism, and gaining power. No more "creating a free society through digital media piracy;" now it's all guns and bombs and knives and everything has to be tied in to the central narrative conflict about identity.
It's difficult to learn about a system when it's all functioning smoothly. It's when a system breaks that you start really learning about the internals. Compared to 2008, in some sense the left coalition's ideology-forming system is "broken," or more compressed into a particular, narrow range.
As a political theorist, I've learned a lot.
I learn from Social Justice by watching the conflict and then synthesizing theory about it. Watching events like, "It's inequitable and therefore racist to teach algebra to 8th graders," tells us a lot about political maneuvering, coalitions, and ideology, but the actual idea itself is just flat bad. It's observational, like a zoologist studying animal behavior in the wild.
This is different from how I relate to the Rationalists or what you call the "New Right." Both Scott and I understood the theory of racism as self-perpetuating, as every sufficiently smart liberal would have back in 2008. There, the relationship is more horizontal.
There's a crossover or flow of ideas or concepts between the Rationalists/Post-Rationalists and the "New Right" because they're the two major groups on the public Internet studying or inventing theory in a way that's of much interest, currently. (The exceptions mostly aren't far from the neighborhood, here. The actual community of people having these ideological or philosophical discussions is smaller than we would have naively expected back in 2008.)
In 2017, Scott published a review of Seeing Like A State, which focused on the concept of legibility (which I sometimes speak of in terms of "dimensionality;" this is an immensely powerful concept that has guided some of my thinking on the nature of capital). This is of interest if you're a "New Right" person or a smart liberal.
For the right-wingers, it's interesting because it sets limits on the appropriate scope and nature of state power.
For the smart liberals, it's interesting because it's part of the set of much more advanced arguments for liberalism based on the limits to obtaining and processing information, and the limits of what can be known, similar to the economic calculation problem.
But if you're Social Justice, then you want to flatten everyone into a limited number of legible categories, so that you can discriminate against them to "correct" "for past injustices."
To take it back out to the conflict analysis level again, Social Justice's actions aren't that interesting at the object level. However, criticisms about "what isn't captured in the metrics" would have been a more advanced critique back in like, 2010. From the conflict analysis perspective, this suggests that the body of ideology is changing in its interpretation as it moves into the hands of different people, which suggests different motivations and different levels of capability.
That is interesting. "How many bits of complexity can our ideology support, and how does it handle under compression?" is an interesting question both for right-wingers and smart liberals.
and in the operational sense (you critique the left primarily and the right only parenthetically).
Republicans can't even manage to produce enough professional-class personnel to staff the government without having to rely on like 30% Democrats (there's a chart somewhere about this).
A lot of assertions that the right wing have power are based on observing things that aren't necessarily caused by the right wing and concluding that the right wing intended for these things to happen, and therefore caused them, and therefore have an immense amount of power.
There is basically no risk of BAPism coming into actual power over the next 20 years.
Social Justice and the broader left coalition choking the genetics industry to death before it can come online, though? That's just assuming that they apply the same playbook to it that they apply to every other industry. (Imagine if they fucked it up as bad as housing is fucked in California.)
If smarter liberals within the coalition were going to stop them, then why haven't they stopped them already?
Between the right-wingers and the left-wingers, the right-wing ideas are generally more immoral or crueler but more functional, while the left-wing ideas are more moral on the surface but are anti-functional.
Think of reduced environmental restrictions vs "degrowth."
We've had social conservatism before, and liberalized out of it. Given that [the left have more power] × [their ideas are more destructive], yes, I primarily criticize the left and criticize the right less often and less severely at this time. I could make a pretty sophisticated argument against a number of right-wing ideas, but that's not really of benefit right now.
In the medium term, it makes sense to align with the right-wingers for the next 10-20 years, as growth in the genetics industry is fueled by the immense demand for near-miraculous cures.
After that medium term, it's much less clear what happens. At some point between 2030 and 2045, different questions within the field of genetics are going to undergo partisan polarization, and it's likely that the makeup of the two coalitions (as well as their ideology) will change.
As we saw from the coronavirus, partisan polarization is unpredictable and varies based on the initial state of the system and the order in which an idea is passing through a coalition. Observing it in action is quite the argument against maintaining a high partisan alignment.
Anyhow, I think you can call mitigatedchaos "right-wing," but I put way too much effort into hedging everything to call it "extreme right." It's about as far to the right as a lot of people are willing to read, as if it were a cottage right next to the jurisdictional border, with a big sign next to it marking out the border line, reading "Right-Wing Beyond This Point."
22 notes
·
View notes
Note
hiii how are you doing mate?
can i have a l'manbur with the flag, please? lil dude's been running around in my head for ages, he wants attention :3 he asked me not to call him 'lil dude' and called me a pipsqueak, and i'm not calling him a big man, so now his nickname is mr. flagpost
(directed to lmanbur:
are you happy :D?? you happy now?? good. your rent is due :]
one more thing, Mr. President?
close the door on your way out :> )
(i love making conversations with the bursonas in my head)
here comes the boy!
#mcyt#dsmp#dream smp#wilbur soot#wilbur soot fanart#c!wilbur#c!wilbur fanart#c!wilbur soot#lmanbur#lmanbur fanart#lmanberg#10pieceart
25 notes
·
View notes
Text
FATE
- xiao believes he’s not worthy of something as gentle as a soulmate. (xiao x gn!reader, soulmate au, repost from my old blog)
a/n - this is kind of my filler until i get to writing more requests, but with school coming up, i don’t know if i will be able to do them in a timely manner. i do take commissions though and definitely will finish those, so message me if you want your request soon
If Xiao had to declare one thing true, it would be “I do not have a soulmate”. There will be no comfort for all he has suffered, and he cannot be caught up in such mortal affairs. There will be no tug in his chest, no sense of overwhelming love, and no hope for him. It's not something he needs, nor something he wants. Until, of course, he was proven wrong.
You struggle against the heavy waves that slam against you, filling your lungs with salt water as you call for help. Beidou frantically steers the Alcor against the mile-high waves, calling for all hands on deck while you feel yourself slipping deeper and deeper into dark water. There's no chance she could get you in time.
In a final moment of panic, you call the name the people of Liyue whispered about. “A-Adeptus Xiao! I call out your name, I call out your name for assistance in the most urgent of times!” Your vision blurs and your mouth tastes of nothing but the power of the sea. The crashing of waves and shouting of crew members fall to a dull throb as you let yourself succumb to the waves.
Xiao stands on the bow of the Alcor with your wet body clutched tightly to his chest. He's surprised by his own speed, even as a adepti. He has never felt this way before. The sheer panic of losing someone he didn’t know existed sent his mind and body into overdrive, hence why he was able to save you so fast.
After handing you to a terrified crew member, he stumbles into a flagpost. His body feels tingly all over.
“What...” he murmurs, tracing a small glowing patch under his shirt. It's hot, hotter than the fire of a dragon and the pools of molten rock buried miles under the Earth. He sucks in a breath and pulls his hand away.
The glowing spot grows rapidly, exploding into a plume of divine light.
As the result of two fated hearts meeting illuminates his face, he knows he had much to discuss with you when you wake up.
Reblogs are greatly appreciated!!
#solar eclipse.#xiao x reader#genshin impact#adeptus xiao#xiao fluff#xiao headcanons#xiao x y/n#xiao x you#genshin x reader#genshin x gender neutral reader#genshin headcanons#genshin impact x reader#genshin x you#genshin fluff#genshin fanfic
241 notes
·
View notes
Text
what;s up with his slutty little sleeve hole
67 notes
·
View notes
Text
so... just as a flagpost to put in the ground, before anybody else comes into my dms or inbox asking me to trigger tag posts w/ james where his self-harm scars are visible, i will not be doing such. people w/ self-harm scars (or scars of any kind for that matter) do not deserve to be censored because of them. i hate to come off as callous, but like... work through it. get over it. scars are scars.
28 notes
·
View notes
Last Seen Blogs
heta-on-the-books
Happy Year of the Dragon
charlesthehandicorn
Chuck's Bay Area Adventures
easystopcatspraying
Untitled
thesunismyhorizon
Captain Tye Knot
easystopcatspraying
Untitled