Tumgik
#Anti-Nazism
thejdog2000 · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
17 notes · View notes
grimm-the-tiger · 6 months
Text
I’m of the opinion that it’s better to make a laughingstock of god-awful historical regimes and leaders than to portray them dead-seriously. Part of my reasoning is because portraying groups like the Nazis as something dark, looming and intimidating makes them seem cool, especially to people who either lack critical thinking or who already agree with the Nazis. This inclines people to emulate them, which causes them to internalize the Nazis’ beliefs, making them seem more tolerable because, well, they’re cool. If you make them seem doofy and incompetent and just utterly fucking stupid, clowns in the same way as a cartoon supervillain that almost won, you a), get close to how the Nazis actually were (morons who just happened to have mastered political MacGyvering and industrialized mass-murder so horrific no one would take it seriously until it was too late), b), make them seem so ludicrous that no one wants to emulate them, and c), piss off the actual Nazis in the audience. 
The other part is because the Nazis legit thought Atlantis was real and wasted YHWH-knows-how-much money looking for evidence of it. Remember Indiana Jones? Yeah, Spielberg didn’t make that up. The Nazis were actually up to shit like that. 
5 notes · View notes
schooltrashers · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
With The Left becoming more Totalitarian, it is abundantly clear that the Democrats and Nazis aren't that different. The above picture is of the Alt-Centrist CommuNazi flag. It fits with my Political Spectrum chart(below). The more Far Left Or Far Right you are, the more likely you are to be Totalitarian.
So what would I consider far-right? Support of Blue Lives Matter, supporting the police is a socialist idea because it takes socialism to fund the police. Even Biden supported the police and introduced a racist crime bill, but Biden is on the Far-Left.
Also, socialism exists on all sides, so there's that. Capitalism exists on all sides as well. For example, if you support anything that requires taxes, that's socialism. If you like to make money, that's capitalism. Hence why Antifa are selling overpriced Anti-Nazi patches on their website. Luckily I got mine for $5 on eBay. So Antifa isn't Anti-Capitalist.
What do I consider Far-Left? Raising taxes, printing money we don't have, and being okay with hyperinflation (Jack Dorsey is a prime example of that).
So what happens if you end up being too far right or too far left? You end up being a Leftist or the Alt-Right. Leftists are Commies and the Alt-Right are Nazis. Leftists aren't true Liberals and the Alt-Right aren't true Conservatives. Since Liberal ideologies don't mix well with Leftist ideology. Conservative ideologies also don't mix well with Alt-Right ideology.
Hence why Alt-Right white nationalist Richard Spencer ended up voting for Biden after realizing that Biden's a racist and Trump is not. Xanderhal claimed he used to be Alt-Right but then became a Leftist. Showing that it is possible for both Leftists and the Alt-Right to switch sides. Their ideologies aren't that different from each other, the only thing that makes them different is who they hate.
Nazis/the Alt-Right for example hate the Jews. Commies/Leftists on the other hand hate straight white Christian men. Any kind of hate leads to CommuNazism. It is possible to be both Nazis and Commies, it's been done before(which I explained in another post).
But it is also possible to be both Anti-Nazi and Anti-Commie through Anti-Totalitarianism, Anti-CommuNazism, and Anti-Extremism. For example, Anti-Totalitarianism means you're against totalitarian regimes such as Nazi and Commie governments.
Anti-CommuNazism means that you're against both Nazis & Commies that are either in government or are a part of an extremist group.
Anti-Extremism means you're against all extremists such as Nazis, Commies, KKK, Antifa, MGTOW, Feminazis, and any other extremist group who are violent, hateful, totalitarian, murderous, or commit riots.
Both Liberalism and Conservatism are authoritarian to an extent. For example in some red states, weed is illegal. It shouldn't be illegal because it has health benefits. It's illegal because it's a threat to Big Pharma. In some blue states, it's illegal to carry or conceal a gun. It shouldn't be illegal because it takes the cops 5 minutes to get to where you're at and sometimes you can't make the call because you have to defend yourself. Hence why it's better for law-abiding citizens to carry a gun so they could protect themselves against a murderer, rapist, or thief.
Now the less authoritarian you are, the more likely you'll end up being a moderate or a Centrist. The ultimate centrist is usually Anti-Totalitarian, Anti-CommuNazi, or Anti-Extremist. As long as you're Anti-Commie or Anti-Nazi, as well as agreeing with the other side on a lot of things, you're a centrist. But of course, Anti-Totalitarianism, Anti-CommuNazism, and Anti-Extremism can exist on a larger scope of the political spectrum through Libertarianism, which exists on both sides. Anyways as far as I can tell, the political spectrum is a circle, not a square. Also, real Anti-Fascism is Anti-Totalitarianism or Anti-CommuNazism, or Anti-Extremism.
21 notes · View notes
dragoneyes618 · 2 years
Quote
An atheist recognizes no higher authority and is not able to or does not see the need to practice restraint in his application of power. This is the reason why the atheistic philosophies of the twentieth century - namely, Communism and Nazism - killed vastly greater numbers of people than any religious regime ever could. There were no boundaries. The ideologies of Marxism, which was based on economic theory, and Nazism, which was based on genetic and racial theory, were quickly soaked in the blood of millions of innocents. The irony is that secular people like to bemoan the millions killed in the name of religion, but it is just the opposite that is true. Secularism is the most destructive philosophy on Earth. No religion ever killed the numbers that the atheistic philosophies killed. There are two reasons why totalitarian regimes must be atheistic. First, so much suffering in the name of economics or nationalism could not be condoned by a society based on a belief in G-d. The people wouldn't see it as necessary and would probably believe it to be against G-d's wishes. Second, religion is an obstacle to the complete subjugation of the population. It is a competing philosophy. To a totalitarian regime, there can be no higher authority than the rulers. Therefore, war must be waged against religion.
David Baum
10 notes · View notes
if-you-fan-a-fire · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
Illustrated leaflet calling for a rally in Hamburg of the Iron Front, 1932, on January 14, 1932, with speakers from the Reichsbanner and the Arbeiter-Turn- und Sportbund (Workers' Gymnastics and Sports Federation) discussing the theme: “Das Dritte Reich Kommt Nicht!” 
Hamburg, January 14, 1932 29.4 x 21.2 cm German Historical Museum, Berlin Inventory no.: Do 65/113
1 note · View note
hardhitandheavyhate · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
go touch grass
0 notes
politijohn · 19 days
Text
Tumblr media
Source
Tumblr media
Source
2K notes · View notes
headbuds · 3 months
Text
Radqueer labels cannot be in good faith.
You cannot be a nazi in good faith.
You cannot be a transphobe in good faith.
You cannot be a groomer in good faith.
You cannot be a rapist in good faith.
You cannot be transharmful in good faith.
You cannot be radpara in good faith.
You. Can't. Be. Actively. Harmful. In. Good. Faith.
159 notes · View notes
latent-thoughts · 6 months
Text
Asking everyone, very graciously, to please refrain from using the word SWASTIKA when referring to the symbol used by Nazis/Nazism. That's not the correct term.
The term you're looking for is HAKENKREUZ.
Swastika/Swastik is an ancient symbol which is holy and sacred to Hindus (and other ancient cultures). We Hindus still use it in our rituals, and it's highly offensive to us to see the use of the word Swastika in relation to Nazis.
It's a symbol of auspiciousness and prosperity, of good luck and celebration. Let it remain so in the collective consciousness. Please don't kill its true meaning by perpetuating the hateful theivery of Nazis.
Thank you.
Tumblr media
295 notes · View notes
lady-grey-1993 · 28 days
Text
Being an anarchist means:
You oppose Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories.
You oppose Russian imperialism in Eastern Europe
You oppose British colonialist presence in Ireland
You oppose Chinese oppression of Tibetans and Ugyghrs
You oppose American capitalistic exploitation of Africa and South America.
You oppose Iranian persecution of religious minorities.
You oppose ANY form of hierarchy, hegemony, or monopoly.
Being an anarchist means you either fight for the absolute freedom and equity of all humanity, or you just sit on your hands praying the "elites" show you their non-existent mercy.
56 notes · View notes
starlight-bread-blog · 2 months
Note
Katara made it very clear that she never ever wants to see Yon Rah again and most of the Zutara fandom supports that decision of hers.
So I guess the possible downside of Katara choosing to marry Zuko means sharing Zuko's burden of reforming and rehabilitating depraved war criminals like Yon Rha and all those who are even worse than him.
Then there's this whole thing with Aaron Ehasz imagining Zuko being Azula's Iroh and she reforms in that way along with my and a few other's ideas of Aang showing her how open and master her own chakras. Speaking of Iroh, does anyone remember his ruthless and brutal 600-day siege anymore? There's no way he'd avoid dropping bodies that whole time.
Looks like Katara will ironically be taking Aang's advice about forgiveness after all but I don't think it'll be necessary for Katara to look for Yon Rah again and say so.
What do you think?
Tw: War crimes, genocide and nazism.
Disclaimer: I don't know what actually happened post canon. I tried to look on internet forums and it seems as the topic wasn't addressed in the comics. For this answer, I'm going under this assumption.
Sorry for not getting to this sooner, life got busy and I didn't want to give some half assed answer to such a delicate topic. There's a lot to comment on so I'll break this down step by step.
"Katara choosing to marry Zuko means sharing Zuko's burden of reforming and rehabilitating depraved war criminals"...
The fire nation commited atrocious war crimes, leaving them with with many war criminals. War crimes are more than punishable. If it were real life, neither Katara or Zuko would have to reform and rehabilitate any of them.
An example of this would be the Nuremberg trials after WW2. Even recently, in 2022, Irmgard Furchner (an 98 year old women) faced a trial for being a secretary of a concentration camp (to put it lightly, she was very much a murderer). No one is getting away with their actions.
I read the relevant section from a Red Cross's document titled "Analysis of the punishments applicable to international crimes (war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide) in domestic law and practice". (The section being "States’ obligations under IHL to prosecute and punish international crimes").
I found something interesting. (ID in alt text).
Tumblr media
*Grave breaches are more serious, vile violations of humananitarian law. Everything above applies to "genocide and crimes against humanity".
If Katara were in a position of power in the Fire Nation, not only would she not have to reform anyone, she also might get to help with the trials for them.
"Then there's this whole thing with Aaron Ehasz imagining Zuko being Azula's Iroh"
I don't know about his plans for Aang's other ideas, so I can't comment on them. What I did find was a short thread of his. And after reading it, I maintain that – like most ideas – his vision can work with sensitive execution.
Azula was still very much a 14 year old victim of grooming when the series took place. Her brother can help her through her redemption under one condition – the desire to be better should come from her.
He shouldn't sit through any mistreatment whatsoever. He'll guide her through a path he already went through, but she has to walk with him. Azula needs to be safe for Zuko. Only then, redemption would be possible.
"does anyone remember [Iroh's] ruthless and brutal 600-day siege anymore?"
The difference between Iroh and Yon Rah is what they're up to now. In the present Yon Rah is just some guy living with his mother. Meanwhile Iroh took back Ba Sing Se from Fire Nation colonizers.
Yon Rah isn't out here fixing his mistakes, he just got off scot-free. On the other hand, Iroh is a changed man and took action to correct his past on the same scale.
At the end of the day redemtion isn't Aang's idea. It's one of the major themes of Atla. It wants to show that people can change and grow. So it does. Zuko changes, Mai changes, Ty Lee changes, and Iroh is their future.
He tried to conquer Ba Sing Se, and now he took it back from conquerors. He was the worst of them all, and now he's unrecognizable. He's warm, wise and sweet. There's a meaning to it.
That doesn't mean that war criminals in the current day, scums who made no affort, will get away with their crimes. That doesn't mean Katara would have to go through the mental torture of reforming her colonizers.
That is it! I hope I didn't come off as aggressive, I didn't mean to. Thank you for the ask, sorry for taking me forever to write this, and have a lovely day!
110 notes · View notes
newyorkthegoldenage · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
Dorothy Thompson, a columnist for the Herald Tribune and host of a nationally syndicated radio program, was one of the few American journalists who recognized Hitler for the danger he was. Despite being ridiculed, she wrote and broadcasted repeated warnings about the Nazi threat throughout the 1930s. In 1939, she was ejected from a German-American Bund (American Nazi Party) rally for heckling the speakers. Here, she receives an ovation as she speaks at a "tolerance meeting" at Carnegie Hall, March 3, 1939, which was held in response to the Bund rally. She addressed a capacity crowd.
Photo: Murray Becker for the AP
60 notes · View notes
tikkunolamresistance · 4 months
Text
The United States be like “we must stop antisemitism!” and then: arm and glorify famously Neo-Nazi Ukraine whilst doing literally nothing about Neo-Nazi rallys in the states.
Here’s an article on Neo-Nazism in Ukraine, dated 2019:
Tumblr media
You can connect the dots yourself on why America only care about antisemitism off US soil!
71 notes · View notes
enjymemink · 4 months
Text
Who said this? A zionist or a Nazi?
Quiz here
Tumblr media
Original tweet
Let's repost with our answers folks. Mine is 10/20 cause I got confused which one was a Nazi quote and which one was a Zionist quote. The similarities didn't surprise me at all.
81 notes · View notes
hussyknee · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
So where is that "Punch Nazis" crowd now?
59 notes · View notes
the-blxck-sheep-blog · 3 months
Text
Anyways, 1 in 3 Holocaust survivors living in Israel live in poverty, and Benjamin Netanyahu tried to absolve Hitler of his war crimes to blame Palestine, and many of the claims against Hamas have been proven false or unfounded.
You can stop sucking the dick of Hitler 2.0 now.
35 notes · View notes