I would like it to be known that the love my mother‘s duck has for my youngest brother is so strong, the duck literally flew against a closed door twice (and through the door on the third try because my brother left the door open for him). Ducks are amazing.
(Meanwhile, the other duck is living her best life, eating flies or whatever she does when she‘s not putting her head into spaces where I need to delicately detangle her neck for wherever she‘s stuck again)
1 note
·
View note
I’ve realized that the main reason I don’t give a fuck about Red Hood’s actual canon crimes is not that I think they’re justified, or reasonable, or even just funny. He has been shown doing very fucked up shit that at times has very little, if anything, to do with any reasonable moral code. But the reason I don’t care is that I’ve steadily become very critical of villain framing. It’s so very common to have a villain say something very reasonable like “poor people shouldn’t die” and then complement it with “and I will kill babies about it.” If the first statement is reasonable, and the narrative does not provide a reason that justifies the balls-to-the-wall batshit “solution” the character came up with, then I assume the author is either deliberately or subconsciously villainizing a specific group of people for no reason, and I don’t vibe with that. At that time I no longer care about what the author/narrative actually has to say and my reaction becomes “the narrator is actually a biased witness and anything they say about this person’s actions should be taken as exaggeration”. Oh, so Jason is an indiscriminate killer who thinks every petty criminal deserves to die? Wrong. They’re exaggerating and taking the facts out of context. So he killed a hundred people in prison with barely any provocation? It probably wasn’t that many and the ones he did were trying to kill him to begin with, with no intervention from the guards, so it was self defense. He attempted to kill a child? Wrong, that was a two-sided fight between two teenagers, he just won so the other one’s bitter. Like, I don’t care how much made up context I need to stuff in there to make it make sense, I will do it because the narrative decided to frame the homeless kid from a poor neighborhood as the villain against the nice and kindhearted humanitarian billionaire so its logic is fucked from the get-go
2K notes
·
View notes
Lee Know who fell in love the moment he saw you at the stage. You looked at the camera and somehow your gaze reached his heart. Your voice, your body rhythm, your stage presence, everything in you was art.
"what's the name of this group again? I wanna see more of them" he asks i.n who's by his side, and the younger just knows why Lee know is suddenly so interested in your performance
345 notes
·
View notes
born to inherit billions of dollars n live with four rich brothers, forced to solve for x
194 notes
·
View notes
the ides of march.... you won't forget them, will you?
241 notes
·
View notes
miku but she is in a game theory thumbnail
i debated whether i should leave the text on there and decided it’d be outlandish enough for a theory
689 notes
·
View notes
Prompt:
Dick Grayson has to juggle being in the spotlight again as Brucie Wayne’s son with his nightly vigilante activities. Easier said than done, when most days he has to struggle keeping his eyes open during the day.
But now? After Brucie’s most recent investing campaign that’s pissing a lot of people off? Yeah, Dick Grayson is once more in the top ten of most wanted on the both kidnappers’ and killers’ lists.
Thankfully there’s a new crime lord in town with a penchant for altruism.
And honestly, this is gonna benefit them both! Dick’s got the money to pay him and Hood’s got the manpower and brute strength to act as his bodyguard, not to mention the added benefit of helping the man turn Crime Alley into something… well, something with less crime! It’s a perfect plan!
Now Dick’s just gotta convince the Red Hood of that, too…
285 notes
·
View notes