#tw pedophila mention
Note
*TW*- i*cest, r*pe, g*re, p*dophilia, some general discourse
Ok so I am trying to ask this in the most respectful way because I don't wanna snowball this into a huge discourse; but I wonder if you've been seeing the Dark Content Discourse here on Tumblr?
It basically entails that despite your personal preferences, attacking/ demeaning other ppl who create/ consume dark content is a big no no because it's their safe space to be able to explore these topics. This includes all sort of stuff like i*cest, r*pe, g*re and even p*dophilia. Now you may not agree with any of these things, most ppl don't, and they might disgust you; which is totally fine. But there is a huge leap b/w something that is fictional and something that is real.
Fictional characters are literal lines on a paper. Doing anything with a fictional child does not mean you are harming a REAL child. This might still disgust you and that's fine too. You can block that person so you don't have to look at it again but to call everyone like this and start a campaign against them is well...
I just want you to know that I am not defending that person. I didn't even know them at all before this...Neither I am advocating for anything they are saying or confirming/claiming that they are good irl. I don't know them.
I just want you look at this from a different perspective and know your thoughts about this ordeal. Like for one moment step away from your pre-existing feelings and bias and look at this objectively. Everyone likes something that's even a lil problematic, so if we went on these campaigns every time, literally no one will be left in fandom. I don't agree with p*dophilia but I don't agree with this either...AGAIN THIS IS NOT MEANT TO CONDONE ANY OF THIS BEHAVIOUR! But to paint someone as a bad person for things they do in fiction in their safe space no matter how problematic, is somewhat disconcerting.
I again wanna say that this is not any hate against you or anyone else. I don't want to cause any discourse myself . I think you are an amazing writer and a valuable member in our fandom. Which is why it's important to me to hear your stance on this. But if you'd rather not answer this at all that's fine too! :>
I appreciate your perspective and I sometimes enjoy certain dark content as long as they warn others but pedophilia— fictional or not— should never be written/glorified/accepted. If it’s written as a horrible incident or traumatic backstory (like Lolita) then I understand why it’s written but glorifying or romanticizing it in any way is unacceptable.
If no one is left in the fandom after going on these “witch hunts” then the fandom is toxic, preditory, and unsafe.
As for the huge leap between fiction and reality, everything starts as a thought or fantasy. The more you think about it the more likely you are to commit or watch such an act.
Tumblr should under no circumstances be a safe place for pedophiles.
43 notes
·
View notes
Text
Iof cannot resist being the absolute worst people they can in public, and zionist are scrambling to minimize it
3K notes
·
View notes
Text
It's crazy how ppl hate on Rowling, and praise Stephen King for speaking against her, when only one of them has written a child orgy in their books and it wasn't her
#gender abolition#radblr#radical feminist safe#radical feminists do interact#radical feminists please interact#i stand with jk rowling#rad fem#terfblr#radical feminism#terfsafe#tw pedophila mention
2K notes
·
View notes
Photo
ready the crabs
#queen elizabeth#uk politics#british royal family#queen elizabeth ii#the queen#england#uk#london bridge#operation london bridge#british politics#ukpol#current events#world politics#tw pedophila mention
33K notes
·
View notes
Note
I’m not trying to attack you, but do you know that proshipper means someone who supports and romanticizes pedophilia, incest, and abuse? Your reblog on that post seems to read that you think antis just hate on people for having ships they don’t like. But it’s completely different than that. Just looking on the proshipper side of Tumblr and the internet and you can see people happily shipping children and adults and making nsfw content of such things.
i appreciate that you're not being outright hostile, but i have to say, that on its own put you above basically every anti i've interacted with.
i understand where antis are coming from, i really do. there are a lot of things on the internet that make me deeply uncomfortable, including the minor/adult ships that you mention. i don't want to anything to do with those kinds of ships and i would be happiest if i never saw them again. which is why i'm proship.
nine times out of ten, if i see that kind of ship brought up on my dash, it's because i was following an anti without realizing it, and they brought it up unprompted and untagged, to talk about how bad it is that they exist. they are the ones putting that kind of content in front of my face and making it harder to avoid.
the thing about people who ship those ships is that they're generally very aware that not everyone wants to see that kind of content, and so they tag it. they make sideblogs to talk about it. they don't go out of their way to shove it in people's faces. that means i, and everyone else who doesn't like it, can avoid it.
what antis want is for it to not exist at all. they want the tags to be purged and blocked, and for anyone who uses those tags to have their accounts deleted. and sure, that might get rid of some of it, but do you know what would happen to the rest? it would stop being tagged. people who don't want to see it wouldn't have the tools to avoid it. this isn't just a hypothetical, that's what's happened any time a fan space has tried to do that.
that's not even getting into the rabbit hole of what should be banned and what shouldn't. obviously any content that depicts real children or real life abuse shouldn't exist and shouldn't be allowed to be posted, but basically any platform that people use already enforces those policies, and there's not much of a slippery slope to go down there. if it involves real living breathing people being abused, it's bad. end of discussion.
but the same can't be said for fiction. ask ten antis for a specific list of all the content that should be banned, and you'll get ten different answers. what about kink? what about roleplay? what about horror and murder and anything that involves fictional characters being graphically tortured? what about people using art to process terrible things that have happened to them? what about art that uses dark themes as a horror element? if you just want to ban anything questionable to anyone, that's the line of thinking that gets any mention of lgbt existence banned. and again, this isn't just a hypothetical, this has happened before, and that's generally where it leads.
i know, from personal experience, that antis do, in fact, send harassment to people just for shipping things they don't like. i've gotten accused of absolutely vile shit for shipping two fictional characters who were both consenting adults. i've seen ship wars turn into moral battlegrounds, over ships that an average person wouldn't bat an eye at.
the thing about "romanticization" is a whole other can of worms. the anti logic goes like this: if someone sees something (even if it's very obviously fictional) in a positive light enough times, they will start thinking it's okay in real life, and go on to hurt real people. the problem with that is that it's just. blatantly untrue.
if it were true every horror movie fan would be a serial killer, every person that studies dark media would be an unhinged psychopath, and everyone who is into ddlg would be a pedophile. but they're not. they just aren't. people have directed movies just as fucked up as the darkest shit on ao3, and are still capable of being normal human beings who know right from wrong in real life.
even if someone is that impressionable, scrubbing away the existence of every piece of questionable content isn't going to solve their problem, because they're still going to be vulnerable to con men, scams, and cultists. the only thing that would actually materially help someone like that is developing their own morals and critical thinking.
children are also more impressionable, and there's a lot of content that's not suitable for them, but that doesn't mean that content shouldn't exist. it just means that they should stick to spaces designed for them (which most social media sites, tumblr included, are not) or, if they're old enough to be responsible for their experience online, they, or a trusted adult in their lives, should block and filter out things that they aren't comfortable with.
which is what everyone on the internet should be doing. it's what i do, and it's made the internet a much more pleasant place to be. and it's why i sometimes worry for antis mental health, especially teenagers, because they're being told it's right and moral to seek out content that makes them uncomfortable and to engage with the people making it. and that's just. really bad. it's not good for the creators that they're harassing obviously, but it's also really bad for them! it's not healthy to seek out things that make you feel bad, and it's a terrible internet safety lesson to teach minors that it's okay for them to seek out and engage with people making adult content.
individual harassment and crusading is never going to succeed at removing dark content from the internet. it just isn't. at best you might get a small percentage of people who create that content to stop sharing it, at worst you're just going to make people stop tagging it, and either way, you're exposing yourself to things that make you feel bad, when you don't have to.
if you want to materially change the type of content you see, you can. the block button is your friend, use it liberally. same with content filtering and tag blocking.
#oops this got really long#cd.ask#proship#disk horse#tw pedophila mention#uhhh what to tag#tw shipping discourse#this doesn't even get into the antis that i've seen proudly professing that they care more about fictional characters than real people#because i don't know how to explain to someone that real humans matter more than cartoon characters#or how to avoid content on platforms other than tumblr bc frankly thats a lot of the reason i don't use them#i don't trust an algorithm#also im turning anon off after posting this so if you want to send me hate you cant be a coward about it#also be prepared to get blocked and ignored#the only reason i answered this person is bc they weren't being hostile
15K notes
·
View notes
Text
hello all yall tall and mall!
just a reminder here to dni if you support or reblog like or anything else by @ simonrileyscockring !
they’re a pedophile, and guess what??
i don’t like pedophiles!!!!!!!!
pls block them and dni with them if you also dislike pedophiles (you should, be a normal fucking person)
558 notes
·
View notes
Text
Hello, Obey Me Fandom. Today, I'm going to talk about a certain problematic person in this fandom.
They're @/snow-owl-oddities. Please report, and block them, so they can get suspended for good.
Mention of Pedophile
Okay, not only they're a proshipper, they also simp over Luke, a CHILD.
This is them responding to an anon calling their behavior out:
"Baby faced short adults exist" Girlie missed the point 💀
Hold on..... Got another screenshot
"Last time I checked being a thousand years old doesn't make someone a child" Girlie, your pedophilic ass is smelly.
"Someone's taste in fiction doesn't dictate what they like and believe irl" not them pulling the 'iT's FiCtIoN' excuse
If you want to excuse their creepy ass, I hope you can't.
Obey Me fandom is alive, but it is full of creepy people
Also, they blocked me. So, whoever read this, please raise awareness
#awareness#raise awareness#tw pedophila mention#obey me!#obey me fandom#obey me luke#obey me nightbringer#obey me lucifer#obey me mammon#obey me leviathan#obey me satan#obey me asmo#obey me beelzebub#obey me belphegor#obey me simeon#obey me diavolo#obey me barbatos#obey me solomon#obey me mephistopheles#obey me michael#obey me mc#obey me thirteen#obey me raphael#call out post
292 notes
·
View notes
Text
//tw- mentions of pedophilia, csem, csa, and lolicon
Guys, please please please don’t use the term CSEM to refer to fictional pornographic drawings that involve fictional characters who are depicted as minors
I can’t believe I have to say this, but I’ve seen too many people, just in the past 24 hours, use the term to describe porn that someone drew
Holy shit, lolicon and the like is not CSEM, CSAM, or CP just because a hypothetical and fictional minor is involved in the art. Those terms are specifically used when talking about real sexual abuse cases involving real-world minors.
Fiction cannot be CSEM because it doesn’t involve the direct sexual exploitation and abuse of a real minor! The creation of these pieces of media do not involve the direct harm of a real minor!
Just say “lolicon��� or “fictional porn involving fictional minors”. Just use something, ANYTHING, that isn’t used to specifically identify real life abuse materials! Please just don’t use a term that has this much seriousness attached to it as a means of labeling fictional content that you don’t like, even if it triggers you!
You being uncomfortable doesn’t justify the misuse of a term that is used to directly describe abuse, and it makes real victims of CSEM feel like shit when you label some random anime girl as a “victim” right next to them. Because, get this, when you label something fictional as CSEM, CSAM, or CP, you are inherently insinuating that there is a victim involved in the creation of this media, which is inherently untrue with fiction. STOP DOING THIS!!!
#tw pedophila mention#tw lolicon mention#tw csa mention#tw csem mention#proship#profic#antianti#anti fanpol#comship#anti anti#profiction#proshipping#fandom discourse#proshipper#anti censorship#anti harassment
753 notes
·
View notes
Text
EW EW EW I FEEL SO GROSS I just saw a carrd that said it's worse to sexualize anime characters than IRL children wtaf antis
#anti anti#proship#proship safe#antis dni#anti harassment#profiction#profic#anti abuse#comship#comship please interact#proship please interact#tw pedophila mention#<- just in case#🌈🍖
236 notes
·
View notes
Text
A professor of Ethics at Oslo Metropolitan University in Norway has called to legalize AI-generated child pornography, claiming that pedophilia should be seen as an innate sexuality that requires destigmatization.
Ole Martin Moen, a gay man who identifies as “queer,” currently serves as a member of the advisory board on Norway’s Patient Organization for Gender-Incongruence (PKI), a social and political lobby group for trans rights.
438 notes
·
View notes
Text
I'm sorry @staff , but wtf is this? What kind of public is this for?
It's a really disgusting ad: first, an AI porn video software generator which is, already, pretty bad. But then, for the image you choose a bruised and beaten CHILD CHARACTER (note, they didn't give her an adult body it's clearly preteen) with "I can make you cum in 1 minute" really?
Is this really the kind of ads for this website? In the place where the existence of a trans person is, for you, obscene by default, you accept this kind of advertisement? This is what you want advertised here? Porn generators?
139 notes
·
View notes
Text
I genuinely don't fucking care what you like in fiction. I don't care how disgusting, heinous, or "illegal" (not actually) it is, as long as you aren't agreeing with it or acting out things you read in a non-roleplay/fiction setting.
TW: Rape, Child Abuse, Pedophilia, Age gaps, Abuse, Bestiality, Grooming, Incest, and similar content
You can read about someone being raped. You can read about a child being raped. You can read about incest. You can read about pedophilic incest. You can read about someone fucking a dog. You can read about someone being raped by an animal. You can read about someone grooming someone else. You can read about horrible power imbalances. You can read about Victim x Abuser. You can read about gang rape. You can read all of that and more, whether the content is "romanticizing" or "sexualizing" it or putting it in a "positive light", because I do believe if you're reading these things you are capable enough to not have your morals and "respect" of laws immediately broken because you didn't get told 100 different times during the story how bad the content was.
You can read WHATEVER THE FUCK YOU WANT, however you want, forever and ever. Don't act out the fiction in real life unless roleplaying with another consent adult (or teenager within your age range if you're not 18+) and it DOESN'T MATTER.
Fiction can affect reality, but usually only if you're allowing it to. Children oftentimes shouldn't be online but even if they are, it is never an authors fault or the people who enjoy the fiction the author writes that the child ends up exposed to bad things. If someone who is mentally unwell and cannot separate fiction and reality due to this is online and is affected by these things, it is not the authors fault or the fault of the people who enjoy the authors fiction.
If something that someone else wrote affects someone else in a bad way, it is not the authors fault.
Censorship of fiction is bad no matter what, and if you want to censor any form of fiction you are automatically already getting closer to people like transphobes and racists and ableists, because being pro-censorship ALWAYS leads down the same exact rabbit hole of puritan beliefs and controlling others.
#Static Broadcast#profic#comship#anti censorship#anti purity culture#pro fiction#proship#tw r4p3#tw child abuse#tw pedophila mention#tw age gap#tw abuse#tw animal abuse#tw inc*st#the fact that the trigger warning tags are censored can easily be an add on to my point tbh
132 notes
·
View notes
Text
oh to have a pervy older bf who uses my small virgin body like a fleshlight☹️🎀
#pedophillia mention#tw pedophila mention#dumb slvt#dumb puppy#bimbo doll#free use slvt#rap3toy#rap3 me#rap3doll#rap3slut#r4p3 kink
125 notes
·
View notes
Text
VERY related to recent happenings: if you sexualize child actors, that is pedoplilia. it doesn't matter if they're an adult in present time. you are still attracted to a child.
I cannot believe this is controversial.
216 notes
·
View notes
Text
rb if your blog is not at all a safe space for these red flags
(image: dreamsexual, zoophilia, p3d0philia/maps, alt map)
#anti radqueer#anti para#paras fuck off#maps#dreamsexual#anti zoophile#tw zoophile mention#tw pedophila mention#pedophillia mention#radqueer unsafe#paraphile unsafe#(whoever the fuck is attracted to minors or animals; please note it's fucking illegal and terribly disgusting. fuck you; please change.)
233 notes
·
View notes
Text
You can just say it's a mistake. It's so much worse to try and excuse it
#wof#wings of fire#glory wof#deathbringer wof#wof memes#tw proship#tw age gap#tw pedophila mention#sp-rambles#The “dragons have different moral standards than humans” excuse bothers me the most#My brother in christ these animals are basically humans with scales and wings#They abide by the same social standards we do#INCLUDING THAT MURDER AND WAR BAD#Why would large age gaps with a child and an adult be any different??
168 notes
·
View notes
Last Seen Blogs
mortuus1349
Sin título
jukti-torko-golpo
হিজিবিজিবিজ।
cholalinguini
big egg fan
sirtravisjacksonoftexas
Untitled