#60 questions
Text
50 FOLLOWERS EVENT
A couple days ago, I hit 50 followers. I've only been here for a month and a half, so all of this is crazy to me.
I decided to set up an event with 60 questions. The first 30 are from a book edition ask game by @iknowitwontwork. The final 30 questions are from a new wip development ask game by @writingonesdreams. If you've been seeing me around your dashboard, then you probably know about my new WIP, The Isles of Blirrosia, which I'll be using for questions 31-60.
To play, just send me an ask with the number to whichever questions you want me to answer.
Do u prefer a standalone or a series?
Your fav genre?
Your least fav genre? why?
A book which had a tv adaption that was better than the book itself?
Enemies to lovers or friends to lovers?
Your fav book trope?
Your least fav book trope?
the best protagonist u have ever seen in a book and why?
If u were stuck on an island and could only have three books w u what would they be? (series would be counted as one cuz as i said so)
the worst book u have ever read?
the best book u have ever read?
a book/book series u wish u could read for the first time ever again?
ur fav author( if u have any)?
an overrated book?
an underrated book?
the book that made u fall in love with reading?
a book to get u out of a reading slump?
a book with a strong female protagonist?
a book u came across randomly but ended up loving it?
do u prefer audio books or e-books?
hardcovers or paperbacks?
a book that u hated at first but now love it?
a book u used to love but now hate?
a book genre u haven't read? why?
a book that had u bawling ur eyes out?
ur fav quote from a book?
a 'fanfiction' trope that u like to see in books?
the last book u read? did u like it?
do u annotate ur books?
give any 3 book recs to ur followers!
What's the log line for your wip?
Describe the plot in one sentence
Describe your wip badly
Describe the main characters
What are the main themes?
What kind of readers would be fans of this wip?
What are the main emotions of this wip?
What are the vibes/aesthetics of this wip?
What are the genres of this wip?
Describe the tropes present in this wip
Any characters you had to cut?
inspired this wip
Do you like working on more wips at once?
Where will the wip start?
What do you like about this wip
What do you find frustrating about this wip
What are you worried about in this wip
What are your goals with this wip
Describe the setting of your wip
Describe your favourite location
How would you describe your WIP’s narrative style? (1st person, 3rd person, multiple POVs, single POV, alternating chapters, etc.)
Do you know your OCs personality types (ennegram/mbti etc)
How would you describe your writing style
What is the most important question to answer about your characters
Name the three most important things for you to plan
What do you still need to plan?
Look for three images which best showcase the overall aesthetic for your WIP
If you could pick three songs to capture the feel of your WIP, what would they be and why?
Books or series or movies influenced your writing style the most?
What stories are the most similar to yours / comp titles?
#quinnharperwritesaskgame#quinnharper50followers#writblr#freelance writer#writers on tumblr#writing#writeblr#writers and poets#writerscommunity#content writing#am writing#wip game#ask game#fifty followers#50 followers#event#60 questions#creative writing#on writing#write#writers#writing community#aspiring writer#amwriting#writing game#book games
7 notes
·
View notes
Note
4, 5, 28, 51 🤍
4.] Seeing The Plot In You & Thornhill next week 😚🖤
5.] My tumblr bestie Angel, do you know her? But also JQ, because he was an absolute doll when I met him 😪
28.] I’ll love you if you feed me and smack my ass. I’m pretty simple to please.
51.] I’m a Virgo ☀️, Leo 🌙, Scorpio ⬆️
Ask me stuff!
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
got thinking about gerard way tour outfit predictions that never came 2 be… bloody wedding dress…
#they’ve got legs and a slit throat!#this is one i believed 2 be totally out of the question bc it would be too bulky restrictive etc#but then i was doing my research and i discovered The 60s Wedding Mini Dress and i was like oh my god she would#kind of a mod vibe but w more gothic detail so it still reads as bridal out of context yk yk. perhaps#mcr#gerard way#digital art#x
9K notes
·
View notes
Video
highest-grossing multimedia juggernaut of all time
#video#to answer the obligatory questions:#footage was recorded on an actual switch (with a dump of a retail cartridge installed to it)#the only editing was the yungoos which was sped up for comedic effect#day 1 patch is installed as noted in the video#yes the game is still decently enjoyable#no it absolutely isn't worth $60
8K notes
·
View notes
Note
GREAT GOOGLY MOOGLY, THE NEXT BOOK 7 UPDATE FOR THE JP SERVER IS SET FOR MARCH 1ST.
HOW WE FEELIN LADS!?!?!
AHHHHHHHH NOOO I'M NOT READY, I thought we'd be getting the fourth anniversary first and then Sebek's birthday and then maybe some more episode 7, I didn't -- I didn't think it'd be Friday --
oh god and they're rerunning the story cards, they didn't say this was the final part but it feels like...maybe the penultimate chapter? could the end of episode 7 finally be looming in the distance?! WHAT AM I GOING TO DO
#art#twisted wonderland#gif warning#gifs that accurately represent the inside of idia's brain whenever he has to have a social interaction#twisted wonderland spoilers#twisted wonderland episode 7 spoilers#twisted wonderland book 7 spoilers#THE SHROUDS ARE BACK IN TOWN BABY#time to find out how the heck ortho managed to hack(?) his way into the dreamscape(????) via a couple of robot dogs(????????)#a-are they going to show us dream!ortho#i don't know if i want that or not. i mean i do but DO I?#(chanting softly) ortho fight ortho fight ORTHO FIGHT --#okay no we're cool we're all cool here#preparing mentally to get exactly zero answers to any of my burning questions#(i kind of suspect anything involving crowley-and-possibly-revaan is going to wait until the presumed episode 8....)#(FEEL FREE TO PROVE ME WRONG THOUGH TWST)#man i just want someone to say the words silver vanrouge at some point#60/40 on whether or not i think it'll actually happen but i want this for my BOY#HE DESERVES IT#he's been through so much just let him have this#...there is something a little bit hilarious about sebek's birthday coming AFTER a big episode 7 drop though#we're gonna be in the middle of like. sebek manfully clasping silver's arm and monologuing about how they are brothers in soul or whatever#and smash cut straight into sebek in a sparkly silver bowtie screaming at a picture of goofy falling down a toilet#my kingdom hearts brethren...i am beginning to Understand
942 notes
·
View notes
Text
Yeah you like Hobie Brown but are you normal about black people?
Like I get it you want him but what do you think of black for black relationships speak clearly into the mic
like okay yeah you think he's cute but do you assume people with hair like this are dirty
Do you think they're unkempt??? Or unemployed. Do you think they wash their hair? Would you ever in your life describe a guy with this hair as cute or hot
One hand on the bible would you date a black man with hair like this yes or no
Can you name any famous man his complexion that you find attractive?? DO YOU EVEN FIND DANIEL KALUUYA ATTRACTIVE??
Name anyone besides him
6'5" black guy with freeform hair and ripped up clothes walking near you at night? You spooked? Your heart racing? You clocking him as a threat? Hmmm? One word answer
6'5" lower class black guy getting stopped by police - you hanging around just to make sure everything is okay? ?? Yeah ???? YEah????
You like him but do you Like Him like him? Do YOU? 👀
#- Diane 💿💖🧁#Diane ghostwrote this#Diane and Hobie after witnessing a Situation#think very very carefully about the questions I am asking you 😳#this quiz is 60% of your grade#spiderman#atsv#spider man#marvel#across the spiderverse#hobie brown#spider punk#spiderpunk#hobie brown x reader#hobie x reader
791 notes
·
View notes
Text
#rolling stones#60s aesthetic#60s music#mick jagger#aesthetic#vintage#old school cool#style#70s style#70s aesthetic#sexually or philosophically#good question#sympathy for the devil
167 notes
·
View notes
Text
also. a little preview of the kind of illustration the vending machine (romance partners edition) commissions will be :)
#(d20 fantasy high s2 voice) your rOmANce pARtNer#they're meant to be like small posters. in style. if that makes sense? it feels like it would be fun! and they're lower in price ($60)#because it's also on a smaller canvas!!#ofc they will not have to be medieval themed. i have a pose reference for this that's two characters lighting up a cigarette together#if you remember my yakuza days. im just saying. i can draw men in suits with questionable morals having a moment shotgunning#smoke or something
213 notes
·
View notes
Note
what makes a poem a poem? does it have to be written in a certain way? is this question a poem if i want it to be?
Fun question! This is just my personal sense as an avid reader and less-avid writer of poetry, but for me it’s useful to distinguish (roughly) between poetry as a genre and poetry as an attitude or philosophy through which language and the world can be understood. And of course these two go hand in hand. I see poetry the genre as essentially a type of literature where we as readers are signaled, somehow, to pay closer attention to language, to rhythm, to sound, to syntax, to images, and to meaning. That attentive posture is the “attitude” of broader poetic thinking, and while it’s most commonly applied to appreciate work that’s been written for that purpose, there’s nothing stopping us from applying that attentiveness elsewhere. Everywhere, even! That’s how you eventually end up writing poetry for yourself, after all. There’s a quote from Mary Ruefle floating around on here that a lot of folks have probably already seen, but it immediately comes to mind with this ask:
“And when you think about it, poets always want us to be moved by something, until in the end, you begin to suspect that a poet is someone who is moved by everything, who just stands in front of the world and weeps and laughs and laughs and weeps.”
Similarly, after adopting the attentive posture of poetics, there’s plenty of things that can feel or sound like a poem, even when they perhaps were not written with that purpose in mind. I’ve seen a couple of these “found poems” on here that are quite fun—this one, for example. The meaning and enjoyment you may derive from the language of a found poem isn’t any less real than that derived from a poem written for explicitly poetic purposes, so I don’t see why it shouldn’t be called poetry.
That said, I do think that if you’re going to go out and start looking for poetry everywhere, it’s still important to have a foundation in the actual language work of it all. Now, this doesn’t mean it has to be “written in a certain way” at all! But it does mean that in order to cultivate the attentiveness that’s vital to poetry, one needs to understand what makes language tick, down at its most basic levels. It will make you better at reading poetry, better at writing it, and better at spotting it out in the wild.
Mary Oliver’s A Poetry Handbook is an extraordinary resource to new writers and readers, and a great read for more experienced folks as well. Mary Oliver’s most popular poems are all to my knowledge in free verse, and yet you might be surprised to find her deep appreciation for metrical verse (patterns of stressed/unstressed syllables), as well as for the most minute devices of sound. In discussing the so-called poetry of the past, she writes,
“Acquaintance with the main body of English poetry is absolutely essential—it is the whole cake, while what has been written in the last hundred years or so, without meter, is no more than an icing. And, indeed, I do not really mean an acquaintanceship—I mean an engrossed and able affinity with metrical verse. To be without this felt sensitivity to a poem as a structure of lines and rhythmic energy and repetitive sound is to be forever less equipped, less deft than the poet who dreams of making a new thing can afford to be.”
In another section, after devoting lots of attention to the sounds at work in Robert Frost’s “Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening”, she writes,
“Everything transcends from the confines of its initial meaning; it is not only the transcendence in meaning but the sound of the transcendence that enables it to work. With the wrong sounds, it could not have happened.”
I hope all this helps to get across my opinion that what makes a poem a poem is not just about the author's intention, and not just about meaning (intended or attributed), but also about sound and rhythm and language and history, all coalescing into something that rises above the din of a language we would otherwise grow tired of while out in our day-to-day lives.
I'll always have more to say but I'm cutting myself off here! Thanks for the ask
#ask#discussion#does this even answer the question? lol#anyways even if you're not huge on mary oliver i still highly recommend a poetry handbook#i admit her poetry is only to my taste about 60-70% of the time. but her handbook is a great resource and can stand alone#i actually think oliver wrote a whole other book just about metrical verse too. for people who are into that#also if you're someone who's less interested in the question 'what is poetry?' and more into questions like#why is poetry? can poetry survive? what the fuck happened to poetics in the twentieth century?#i recommend the witness of poetry by czeslaw milosz#an older book—actually a collection of lectures—but an absolute game-changer for me#not a poll
463 notes
·
View notes
Text
it takes a lot out of me to remember myself. i turn my face away from it and my body cracks open, spilling glistening hot viscera onto the floor for the audience to coo at. scenes flash behind me—dark corners, the breeze from the window, the floorboards creaking, a shift in the air. close to me, you look over my shoulder. you tell me, “you kept yourself so still when you were younger.” i want to ask how you know that. how do you know? but you reach out to touch my open body, press my hand to your chest, hold my face. it’s in your eyes. you were a boy once. just like me.
#cw self harm#cw injury#cw blood#simblr#the sims 4#ts4#ts4 edit#river dipping#theodore doe#matthias evanoff#echthroi#a burning house to live in#🦇#the link in the caption is to the full version of this image if anyone is curious about the actual details in this edit.......#i'm beating tumblr with so many hammers rn btw#the caption itself is pretty long but i didn't want to cut any of it to make it easily digestible bc theo isn't easy to digest anyway#i don't even know where to begin with this edit...#he's getting up from his knees in the first pose and then limping in the second and slowing to a stop in the third#the first pose is actually meant to be in reference to the sunflowers memory from his 60 questions... :/#his teenage self is definitely the one i put the most work into every step of the way... it's a time for him i don't really talk about#but it's definitely the years that shaped him the most as a character and well... theo doesn't really confront his past#but matthias mirrors theo in a lot of ways and through matthias theo meets himself again#hm. yeah. also doing the lighting from scratch was interesting. the light source here for theo is matthias and vice versa#if you look at the higher quality version of this and zoom in you can see that theo is actually crying pretty blankly in the second pose...#the blood running down his knee came out really well... wish you could see it in the post version :(#also i made a pose where theo is held up in matthias's arms hiding his face in his neck which is attached to this pose set but idk.#decided not to include that picture... plus i'd have to edit it first which would've been... so many more hours.#but anyway... theo's birthday was on the 28th but there were. circumstances. waves hands. so now we're posting this two days late.#in the same vein as matthias's birthday edit from april: here's to the first person to ever show theo love.
289 notes
·
View notes
Text
on a really good day, what’s a celebrity you think you could pull? because i feel like on a good day i could pull kurt cobain (delusion)
౨ৎ⋆ ˚｡⋆
#aesthetic#60s#girlblogger#girlblogging#1950s#coquette angel#fypage#fypシ#vintage americana#coquette#nirvana#questions#celebrity crush#celebs#celebrities#hot celebs#kurt cobain#music#rockstar girlfriend#lizzy grant#tumblr girls#girlhood#girl interrupted#just girly thoughts#just girly things#this is what makes us girls#this is a girlblog#tumblr 2014#coquette aesthetic#female hysteria
64 notes
·
View notes
Text
Watching Awakening Parts 4 & 5 is mostly just me waiting for my favorite failwoman to have a bazooka-assisted meltdown on national TV
#gargoyles#disney's gargoyles#this whole exchange is flippin' incredible#girl you went from 0 to 60 in 0.3 seconds#she was happy for like… what… an hour? before it all started falling apart#for someone who’s been alive for so long you think she’d’ve learned some patience and subtlety#but no all she really knows is how to betray first and not ask questions later#anyway I can't do justice to her and all her character flaws in these tags but she's incredible and tragic and complex and I love her#demona
90 notes
·
View notes
Text
i think the biggest problem of season 3 (of which there are Several) is the shift away from football being the crux of the story, which has undoubtedly resulted in the aimless, overstuffed, unfocused narrative we've been seeing for the last eight episodes. season one was as excellent as it was because whether richmond won or lost a match actually mattered; if they lost too many matches, they'd be relegated, and relegation was always treated as a distinct, tangible threat. there were stakes. and while season two had its issues with pacing and unnecessary subplots, no one would call it aimless. the characters had a goal (pun intended): to get promoted back to the premier league. if they lost too many matches, they would stay in the championship league. we as the audience were invested in whether or not richmond won or lost, and the narrative was all the stronger and more coherent for it.
season one asked us, can afc richmond avoid relegation? and we were invested in the answer. season two asked us, can afc richmond be promoted? and we were invested in the answer. now we're eight episodes into season three, and the overarching goal of the season, the question it is asking its audience to remain invested in, is...what? what are we building towards? is afc richmond's goal to win the whole damn thing? to beat west ham? to beat man city? to do just enough to avoid relegation again?
and because we can't answer this question, the narrative has suffered greatly. how are we supposed to believe beard when he says man city is the team's white whale if we haven't even seen them play each other yet this season? if ted's total football epiphany was so life-changing for richmond, why did we speed past all the matches this episode where the team won using that strategy? if this is all leading to a final nate-ted west ham-richmond match, why haven't we spent any time with nate at west ham? why haven't we gotten to see him grow and develop as a coach? at one point, the team was doing so badly that higgins suggested firing ted, who has been visibly struggling on and off the pitch - and the narrative did not give that suggestion the weight it might have had in season one or two. we spent an entire episode watching rupert, rebecca, and chelsea fight over zava - and then two episodes later he was gone, and we haven't so much as mentioned him since. just last season, sam was being heralded as the star of afc richmond, highly sought after by other club owners - but we haven't gotten to see any of his alleged brilliance on the pitch this season at all. i have to kick a little ball around, which those same people love me for, sam said in 3.07, that is, until i fuck up or miss a penalty, or i decide to fight back - a speech that was excellently delivered by toheeb, but loses some of its weight because we haven't actually gotten to see any negative reaction to sam missing a penalty or fucking up or deciding to fight back (not even in season 2 after the dubai air boycott).
(all this to say: i do enjoy the show. i love the characters, i've been enjoying the episodes as individual units, and i'll continue to tune in week after week. but for a show that once boasted football was life, it's sure been suffering since it decided to stop focusing on that.)
#ted lasso#ted lasso spoilers#ted lasso critical#been thinking this for a few days now and had to get it all out on paper (so to speak)#yes this season is just as punny and heartwarming and quirky as usual but like. what is everything building towards here#like the only overarching plotline so far is colin's coming out arc and it's being handled great so far#but that can't be the overarching question of the season you know???#too many questions not enough answers#they should have kept the episode lengths at 30 minutes; forced the writers to keep the plot as tight and focused as in s1#45-60 minutes is a lot of time when you aren't building towards anything
237 notes
·
View notes
Text
Am i insane enough to make all of the hollow knight characters into gijinkas? Perhaps...
#hollow knight#gijinka#mister mushroom#fierce dryya#snail chaman#the hunter#humanization#i mean i think i have made around 60-ish so far#the real question is#can we make them before silksong comes out?#im going to explode#snail shaman#<- there#i can't write im so silly goofy#my art
769 notes
·
View notes
Text
60 questions to ask the Duffers if Byler isn’t endgame
Thank you @merth-or-nothin for the help!
1. Why emphasize so much on the strong “Friends don’t lie” in the very first episode of the show, showing Will couldn’t even lie to Mike, only for him to lie to Mike for the first time in the second to last episode of the second to last season?
2. Why did Mike and El such a short build up before getting together? If they were meant to be endgame, why not build them slowly, so the audience could be invested in the development of the relationship?
3. Why were Mike and El separated every single season?
4. Why do Mike and El fight so much when they’re together? They barely have any cute scenes at all when they’re dating.
5. Why did El refer to Mike as "her first boyfriend?"
6. If she was meant to only date (then marry) Mike, why draw attention to the fact that he's the only boy she's dated?
7. What was the purpose of El asking Mike if he'd be like her brother in s1? Why give them a familial association?
8. In season 4, why is it revealed that Will is in love with Mike as Mike's relationship with El is eroding?
9. Why make a point to show the audience Will loves Mike the way he wants to be loved, while El makes him feel like a random nerd?
10. Why have Will in the background of every single Mileven scene (except for their bedroom fight) in the entire S4, making the audience to root for Will?
11. Why have Will love Mike at all?
12. Why bring Will into Mike and El's relationship? If Mike doesn't feel the same way, it's a waste narratively and it's anticlimactic.
13. Why did Mike change so much between seasons 2-3 without any perticular reason? And no, it wasn’t just puberty. That change made Mike go from being one of the most loved characters to one of the most hated ones.
14. Why frame Mike and Eleven’s relationship in S3 as unserious and unhealthy?
15. Why make everyone go against their relationship and why break them up as early as in the beginning of the second episode of S3?
16. Why empathize so much on El in EP3 and her independence, making us (the audience) feel genuinely happy when she breaks up with Mike and frame the breakup scene with light-hearted humor and comedy?
17. Why make Will and Mike’s first fight scene in the show dark and angsty? And making it a huge contrast to Mike and El’s comedic breakup scene.
18. Why make Max say “he’ll come crawling in no time begging for forgiveness” to El, which was true, but he didn’t come crawling back to El. He went to Will’s house, begging for forgiveness.
19. Why spend SO MUCH time on the Byler scenes and putting so much effort in them so they’ll look intimate? It’s such a contrast to Steve and Dustin’s scenes for example which is almost always comedic.
20. Why have so MANY Byler scenes at all?
21. Why have “tender emotional music” in almost all of the Byler scenes in S4?
22. Why make Will even confess behind El’s name instead of just confess himself and having Mike rejecting him right away? Why drag it out all the way to the very final season?
23. Why spend an entire day filming the van scene if it wasn’t that important anyway? If Will is just ending up getting rejected anyway?
24. Why the whole painting plot?
25. Why so many parallels with Jopper, Jancy and Lumax?
26. Why the very same soundtrack when they became friends again as when Lucas and Max became friends “On the bus”?
27. Why is Finn describing Mike’s story arc for both season 3 and season 4 as “Mike is trying to be a normal teenager”, “Mike is trying to be as normal as possible” and “He’s trying to keep on a normal path” why so much focus on Mike trying to be normal?
28. Why spending two seasons on Mike trying to say the word “love” to his girlfriend? Isn’t that a kinda boring arc for someone who’s just having bad self esteem because of his parents loveless marriage?
29. Why does the whole cast and even the Duffers always so secretive and giddy and smiley every time Byler gets brought up if it’s just another sad tragic unrequited love story?
30. Why having Will say “I’m not gonna fall in love” with such a heartbreaking tone and then end up making him not get the boy he’s in love with and has been since the very beginning?
31. Why put so much effort in the set design to queer code Mike (as in rainbows, shirtless men, monsters with muscles, the word BOY in the bg, multiple closet imagery, even a big sign towards the closet saying “One way” if it meant nothing or was just weird coincidence’s?
32. Why the triple take? What was the point of that?
33. Why filming and editing the last scene of S3 emphasizing that Mike is going to miss Will more than El? (Him looking back at Will’s house, then it cuts to Will, then it cuts back to Mike who walks up to his mom and hugs her with a heartbroken look on his face)
34. Why make El say in the letter “I think there’s someone Will likes, cause he has been acting weird” but all we see in s4 is Mike acting weird?
35. Why make Mike being able to hug everyone except for Will, when he could hug him just perfectly in s3?
36. Why make Mike treat Will differently than his other friends?
37. Why make Mike and Dustin have the same look on their faces as they watch Will and Max dance with other people and then after that Mike looks upset until El shows up?
38. Why is The Duffers so “hushy hushy” about Byler at all? If it was obvious it’s unrequited why not just clear that shit up because they KNOW they’ll get a lot of backlash if it turns out it was a big queer bait all along.
39. Why start to build up and hint at Will’s love for Mike from the very first episode and make it canon in the second to last season?
40. Why so many coded talks which easily could be interpreted differently? Like Karen’s “I want you to know you can talk to me, I don’t want you to feel like you have to hide anything from me”, Ted’s “See what happens?” About Will’s disappearance (as in see what happens if you’re queer? You get abducted, killed etc) and Ted’s “our son with a girl?”
41. Why make Mike NOD in the scene when Will talks about how difficult it can be to open up about something the other person may not like to hear?
42. Why make Will having to remind Mike of the painting and his coded speech before Mike can say it? Why could he only say it the moment El was about to die?
43. Why make it look like Mike doesn’t want to kiss El by removing her hands away from him (3.01) and not reciprocating, not kissing back with eyes wide open looking confused in 3.08? Why frame him like he isn’t interested in girls at all? (Princess Daphne, Phoebe Cates, Max etc.)
44. Why never show us Mike’s pov?
45. Why SO MUCH effort in flashbacks during the entire S4 except for the monologue when El only remembered one single moment with Mike? Why did she had so many with Max but only one with Mike?
46. The ending scene in S4. WHY put them in couples when they could just have made them stand together all of them instead?
47. Why does it look like El isn’t talking to Mike at the end of S4? Why does she look annoyed at first and THEN sad when she finds the bottle under her bed which reminds her of Max?
48. Why SO MUCH yellow and blue coding when it comes to Will and Mike? Even their colors of their clothes are almost always blue and yellow as well.
49. Why make Mike nervous every time Will is close to him in S4 or accidentally touches him?
50. Why make Mike say “we’re friends” to Will twice when both him, Will and the audience clearly knows that already?
51. Why associate the word “crazy” with “love” and then make the “crazy together” scene?
52. Why having Mike saying “it was the best thing I’ve ever done” about meeting Will but then having him say his life didn’t start until he met El?
53. Why did Mike’s words work for Will in S2 (making him being able to communicate) but didn’t for El (not until she looked over at Max)?
54. Why write the lines for Will “We could just play DnD for the rest of our lives” and “Not possible” about him joining another party?
55. Why make Mike look at Will’s lips so much? Why the flirtiness in the bedroom scenes in S4? They could easily have remade those scenes if that wasn’t intentional.
56. Why all the classic romantic interruptions in season 4 which we’ve seen plenty of times in the show between “more than friends”-couples earlier?
57. Why make such a HUGE contrast between El’s reaction to being without Mike and Will being without Mike in S3? (El did a high five with Max while Will cried and destroyed Castle Byers)
58. Why make Mike say “Hawkins isn’t the same without you” to only WILL and not to El? Why does Mike not have any problems opening up to Will but only to El?
59. Why couldn’t Mike say the full reason why he and El had their fight in 4.03?
60. Why have so much hints and clues in the show that Byler is endgame so it’s possible to make 300+ pages slideshows, hours of long videos with proof of Mike being gay, if everything is just unintentional or “made up”?
202 notes
·
View notes
Text
? And The Mysterians – 96 Tears (1966)
451 notes
·
View notes
Last Seen Blogs
itseivwhore
"...so easily wounded by words"
loganlermanitalianworld
Logan Lerman Italia
cutesunshinecom
Cutesunshine-com & Recipes | Health | Moms | Beauty | Tips&Trick
schoicer-blog
Untitled
ihidthedivorcepapers-blog
Lilyarum