Tumgik
#wish fulfilment
littlefeltsparrow · 2 months
Text
There’s this running theme of Feyre forgiving those who have wronged her, while Rhysand aggressively asserts that he will never forgive them.
We see this with Nesta and Lucien, and the whole song and dance of Rhysand refusing to forgive those who hurt Feyre or those he perceived to have hurt Feyre can be understood as a kind of fantasy. I’ve said it before, but Rhysand’s aggression towards individuals who harmed Feyre appeals to a desire to be defended by a much stronger party against an enemy you were once powerless against (all while never having to ask them and in many cases, disavowing such a reaction)
Readers who relate to Feyre can take pleasure in seeing the ones who harmed her (according to the text) be punished through becoming dominated by her new powerful and devoted protectors. Making them feel guilty for their actions, making them submit to her through force or intimidation to engage in a kind of indulgent performance of self-flagellation. We see this with the hike Nesta is forced to go on, the purpose of this hike is not for her self-actualization, but for the pleasure of seeing her in intense emotional and physical pain. The wish fulfillment narrative takes pleasure in watching her grovel for Feyre’s forgiveness, which is why it goes back on the sisters relationship development multiple times. Maas just can’t help herself.
For Rhysand, the most powerful High Lord in all the land and being impossibly powerful, flatters the reader through his aggressive defending of Feyre. Feyre who was once her family’s mule (in ACOTAR’s ridiculous and drawn out sequence of indulgent suffering porn) can magnanimously forgive her sisters for their past mistakes, while also having them punished whilst disavowing that very punishment. This is especially apparent with Nesta, the frequent subject of Rhysand’s ire, who is disproportionately punished for her past wrongdoings.
I recognize it, but I really can’t buy into the pleasure of the wish fulfillment in the story because I don’t think that Nesta or Lucien ever deserved the harsh treatment they got. Their past actions weren’t bad enough to justify such horrendously cruel treatment and intimidation on the part of the IC. This breaks the illusion and makes me dislike the IC and Feysand.
380 notes · View notes
pratchettquotes · 3 months
Text
People get exactly the wrong idea about belief. They think it works back to front. They think the sequence is, first object, then belief. In fact, it works the other way.
Belief sloshes around in the firmament like lumps of clay spiraling in a potter's wheel. That's how gods get created, for example. They clearly must be created by their own believers, because a brief resume of the lives of most gods suggests that their origins certainly couldn't be divine. They tend to do exactly the things people would do if only they could, especially when it comes to nymphs, golden showers, and the smiting of your enemies.
Terry Pratchett, Reaper Man
239 notes · View notes
gigidragonbbxxx · 2 months
Text
feeling guilty about manifesting an sp?
don't.
I keep seeing tweets and reddit posts asking something along the lines of "Is it morally wrong to manifest an sp when they're in a relationship/is it wrong to manifest an sp to change their sexuality?"
NO.
a big fat NO.
if any of you have answered: yes it's wrong, YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE LAW OF ASSUMPTION.
to be quite plain, if you learn and believe in the Law of Assumption, it is within the same breath that you must acknowledge the infinite possibilities your life can take on = simultaneous different realities
when you decide that you and your sp are meant to be, you begin to experience the timeline where that is the reality. the same goes for sexuality. you begin to experience the reality where their sexuality is different, etc.
Reminder: You're constantly choosing a reality to experience over and over again each time you make a decision, each time you believe in something, etc.
People do this automatically, without knowing the law. There is no other way to experience the 3D going forward. Each thing that comes your way is a product of your assumptions. Even for everyday life. The difference with knowing the law is using it to your advantage.
Example:
Person A and B are both 16 and can drive. Their entire lives they have witnessed traffic, experienced traffic, heard their parents complain about traffic, seen traffic affect people's plans, witnessed traffic being used as an excuse for tardiness, watched it on screen, read about it on news or social media, etc.
Both Person A and B have a relatively high self-concept naturally.
Person A continues to go through life doing well but experiences traffic. Person A accepts that this is part of life and they are not an exception to experiencing traffic. They assume sometimes they're lucky or sometimes they aren't. They assume that this is normal.
Person B learns about the law and uses it to their advantage. They begin to affirm that they are always the exception. They assume that traffic exists but that they do not experience traffic. They assume every time they're warned about traffic, that it will be miraculously over with or fast-moving once they catch up to it. They assume that experiencing delays with travel does not happen to them. They assume they get everywhere on time. Person B always affirms that they are punctual and make good impressions.
BOTH ARE MANIFESTING.
The difference is what each person assumes and it creates their reality.
They are in the timeline where Person A doesn't manifest being the exception while Person B does.
Now, there's a timeline where both persons know the law and apply it. There's a timeline where neither of them know about the law.
IT IS ALL ABOUT WHAT YOU PICK. SO PICK WISELY.
so, to conclude: do not feel guilty about manifesting an SP
BUT DO NOT BE MESSY. Don't try to be their side chick or get up in their face while they're still with someone else. If you truly believe in your power, just let your SP come to you. Besides, why would you even acknowledge the 3P? You're about to enter a timeline where they're gone.
The only job you have is to change self.
xx, gigi
111 notes · View notes
sencubussubs · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
Inner vs Outer in Manifestation
hi lovelies!
Today i want to explain the inner versus the outer, this is more a post for people new to LOAss but everyone’s journey is different so this may help you too!
Inner
Your inner in manifestation is your mind. 95% of manifestation takes place in your mind. this is because, as Neville says, creation comes from imagination.
Your brain, as you learn and grow, creates neural pathways - your dominant thoughts and what your subconscious works off of. Your subconscious/ dominant thoughts are in turn what manifests into your 3D!
Thus all methods you do - even techniques like scripting that you do in the 3D - all work to change your inner, to rewire your dominant thoughts, to create new neural pathways, however you want to think of it!
This is why no circumstance actually matters, because your entire 3D is a reflection of your dominant thoughts. As long as you can imagine a world/ reality where you have your desire, you can have your desire.
You must simply choose to be the version of yourself who has your desire - whatever it might be - and persist in that internally. The 3D will simply reflect that, as long as you are focused on your inner and not allowing the irrelevant, old story 3D to throw you off track.
If unfavourable 3D events occur, simply reject that outcome in your mind. SP says they don’t want you? simply be like Okay, and in your mind know that this is not relevant to you and that you know you and SP are together. Bank account states you have 12 cents? Nah, you are rich as fuck, you always have at least 4 figures in the bank. Continuing to be the new version of yourself, in the state of wish fulfilled, will help your dominant thoughts rewire to believe that is what your life is!
Outer
Your outer world is the 3D. The world around you that you perceive with your senses :). The 3D honestly has very little to do with manifestation!
You do not have to take any 3D action to receive any desire, because as long as you decide and persist in the version of yourself that has your desire the 3d will reflect this. The 3D is a mirror to your inner world and dominant thoughts. it cannot reject anything you decide you have internally.
To make it very clear, choosing to be the version of yourself that has their desires is internal - if you choose to be the version of yourself that has your SP, you do NOT need to go around saying SP is your boyfriend if the 3D hasn’t reflected that yet. In turn however do not take actions like complaining about SP not reaching out to you etc - because these actions are going to reaffirm dominant thoughts that you have that SP does not want you/ isn’t giving you their all and is not gonna help you manifest. Thus also, looking around constantly for your desire and not seeing it because you are so focused on looking for it is also going to reinforce your dominant thought that you do not have this desire! SO just leave the 3D out of it.
Hope this helps you stars <3
love,
Saph
54 notes · View notes
broadwayinabox · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
A little trip to St. Swithins wouldn’t be too painful
49 notes · View notes
whereserpentswalk · 19 days
Text
33 notes · View notes
manic-mind22 · 23 days
Text
Isn't it great how queer as folk just ends after Brian proposes and Justin says yes? Just ends. Full stop. That way the show runners couldn't fuck the whole thing up?
4 notes · View notes
mintacle · 1 year
Text
I'm really serious about my posts how Jason is a girl because he represents so much of the girl experience and yes this is absolutely in the lane of DC accidentally writing something really good.
If you're a girl and you love Jason then you deserve to get a firm hug, a gun and a free purge day applicable to yourself only. You're only out for one person anyway and they deserve it, you go girl.
If you're a guy and you love Jason then you're on the right side of history and you get a long hug and forehead kiss and you deserve affirmation and love from your parental figure of choice.
If you're nb and love Jason then you deserve to punch the next person in the face who gets your pronouns repeatedly wrong despite corrections and you deserve a baseball bat to beat someone up with. Similar to the gun thing for girls just with a bit more fire to the anger and a bit less cold-hearted hate.
If you're trans and love Jason then whichever of the former applies + you get to sock someone in the jaw too for using your wrong pronouns or deadname + you deserve to meet someone who didn't know you before and sees only this you now and will never compare you to or grieve the person you used to be.
37 notes · View notes
ducky4eva · 5 months
Text
What would they wish for?
I'm curious. Ugly Betty world. Choose a character, and tell me what their ultimate-deep-down-in-their-heart wish would be. And if it were granted, how would it affect their world, who they are, and their role/interactions in the Ugly Betty universe.
Daniel? Betty? Marc? Amanda? Claire? Wilhelmina? Bradford? Alexis? Ignacio? Hilda? Justin? Christina? Becks? Henry? Matt? Walter? Gina? Sofia? Renee? Molly? Any other small/random character?
Seriously, please blow up the comment section, or reblog and write your theories. I'd love to know. 😍😆
(Isn't this promotional pic cool?)
Tumblr media
3 notes · View notes
hearse-full-of-rats · 5 months
Text
Why does freud have to make everything about repressed sexual desire???
2 notes · View notes
tinyreviews · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media
Netflix adaptations are a genre upon themselves. Lotsa lazy writing, cheese, contrivances, just hitting the beats, politically acceptable and bland. Solely depending on the built-in audience for views. Kinda like Disney/Marvel/Starwars now, I guess
Zom 100: Bucket List of the Dead is a Japanese action fantasy comedy, directed by Yûsuke Ishida, starring Eiji Akaso, Mai Shiraishi, and Shuntaro Yanagi. It is based on a manga series of the same name.
4 notes · View notes
janeeyreheresy · 1 year
Text
Real Life
So, why did Charlotte Bronte write Jane Eyre the way she did?
In 1842 Charlotte Bronte and her sister Emily travelled to Brussels and enrolled at a school, a pensionnat. As the sisters planned to start their own boarding school, they first needed to expand their education. They were able to pay for their board and tuition by teaching--Charlotte taught English, Emily music. The school was run by a married couple, the Hegers. Constantin Heger was a teacher and, by all accounts, one very passionate about his profession. Charlotte had a massive crush on him. It's not hard to understand. He was the one who first recognised her talent for writing. In October 1942, Elizabeth Branwell, aunt to Bronte children, who had lived with the family since their mother's death (she was the mother's sister), died and Charlotte and Emily left the school for home. Charlotte returned to Brussels on her own in January 1843 and stayed there for a year.
The extent of her feelings was not known until The Times published Charlotte's letters to Prof Heger in 1913. The letters were torn and glued back together again. They are also rather one sided, it appears Heger rarely responded. Here's an excerpt from one dated January 1845 (source):
all I know – is that I cannot – that I will not resign myself to the total loss of my master’s friendship – I would rather undergo the greatest bodily pains that have my heart constantly lacerated by searing regrets. If my master withdraws his friendship from me entirely I shall be absolutely without hope – if he gives me a little friendship – a very little – I shall be content – happy, I would have a motive for living – for working.       Monsieur, the poor do not need a great deal to live on – they ask only the crumbs of bread which fall from the rich men’s table – but if they are refused these crumbs - they die of hunger -  No more do I need a great deal of affection from those I love – I would not know what to do with a whole and complete friendship – I am not accustomed to it – but you showed a little interest in me in days gone by when I was your pupil in Brussels – and I cling to the preservation of this little interest – I cling to it as I would cling on to life.
Do you see it? "I will not resign myself to the total loss of my master's friendship". "Monsieur, the poor do not need a great deal to live on - they ask only the crumbs of bread."
Charlotte Bronte wrote an emotionally unavailable man as the main heroine's love interest, because her own love interest was unavailable--he was married. It also explains Jane never calling him Edward--Charlotte never got to call the man she loved by his first name.
The age difference between Charlotte and the professor was not as big as the age difference between Jane and Rochester--only 7 years. But at the time of the publication of Jane Eyre in 1847, he was 38--the same age as Rochester in the book.
I wonder, when she came back to the pensionnat in January 1843, did he ask her where she had been? Did she answer, with her family as her aunt died, and did he say to her: "a true Charlottian reply"?
Was the geography fail in the With a Proposal Like This, Who Needs Death Threats post a slip of a pen? When she returned home for good, Charlotte was separated from Heger by the English Channel. In the book, had Jane taken the job in Ireland, she would have been separated from Rochester by the Irish Sea. (I know it was a fake job, but work with me here.) Yet Rochester talks of the Channel. Did Charlotte make this mistake subconsciously? (Otherwise it's got to be the Watsonian explanation of Rochester making a slip of a tongue--he was used to being separated from his mistresses by the Channel. He said himself he never went to Ireland.)
Why a Mad Wife?
The idea of a madwoman most likely came from Charlotte's visit to Norton Conyers in North Yorkshire. The place has a legend of such a madwoman confined to the attic. That is well known. However, we're not talking about mad women inhabiting Norton Conyers. We're in my abyss of dark theories.
Constantin Heger's wife was Claire Zoe Parent. She was the one who owned the school. According to this source, she made him sign in the ledger for his salary. 
So she appeared to be the one with the wealth. 
I wonder, what colour was her hair? 
Portrait of the Heger family by Ange Francois, 1846:
Tumblr media
Blanche and Bertha are similar, you say, they both have dark hair? Will Blanche end up in a nuthouse?
It turned out to be much simpler than that.
I save the best item for last. 
The hands down most baffling bit of the narrative, so irrelevant and nonsensical, it makes one scratch one's head so much one risks one's hair falling out, in a desperate and feverish attempt to understand why in the ever living fuck Charlotte included it in her book.
Bertha being five years older than Edward. Why is it a thing?
Constantin Heger's year of birth: 1809.
Claire Zoe Parent's year of birth: 1804.
I rest my case.
So wait, the entire book is a wish fulfilment?
Looks like it.
*Shrug*
I don't hold it against her. It's not a bad thing. After all, male writers do it too. Indulge yourself, girl. We've all done it, all of us that ever dabbled in writing. (Not many of us are likely to have our works elevated to the status of classics, but hey, a book is a book.)
Sometimes it helps just to it write it all out, get it out of one's system. Heck, I'm doing it right here!
Why so bitchy then?
Well, sometimes you gotta. And there is the fact that after the death of Anne, Charlotte prevented re-publication of her sister's novel The Tenant of Wildfell Hall. 
2 notes · View notes
gigidragonbbxxx · 2 months
Text
sp rampage
I am the only one my sp thinks about. He is the definition of obsessed. I am his favorite thought. He is always thinking of me positively. He daydreams about our future. He is impatient to treat me like the queen I am. My sp is committed to me and only me. He enjoys being monogamous with me, he is healthily (only to my benefit and none to harm me) possessive over me. I am spoiled by my sp. My sp puts me on a pedestal. He expresses his love for me daily and he never wastes an opportunity to make me feel special. He speaks highly of me and is proud of all my accomplishments. He appreciates my depth and values my intelligence. He is successful and ambitious because he wants to afford to give me everything. I am his world and he knows he's the lucky one to be loved by me. He protects me, he understands me, he fights for me. Our love is full of trust. He never gets bored of me, I am an endless pool of fascination for him. His ideal day is a day spent in my presence. I am more than enough. He is never too proud to text me, to cry over me. He is vulnerable with me because he feels safe. I feel like home to him. I am a comfort to him and he is a comfort to me. Our physical connection is passionate and intense, full of variety and fun but ultimately an activity that only deepens our connection. We are soulmates living in our highest timeline. Our love is beautiful.
62 notes · View notes
sencubussubs · 3 months
Note
I've seen ppl say that it's okay to know that your 3d will conform soon. But ppl always say to affirm that the 3d has conformed INSTANTLY (like, the SECOND you affirmed/decided to have something) because doing the former could unknowingly put you in a state of WAITING for your 3d to conform, & constantly pushing your manifestation into the future. BUT THEN AGAIN, ppl will say that "the 3d always gives you results INSTANTLY, BUT that the results aren't visible to our eyes yet because they're "still within the realm of the unseen" (which i think just means imagination/the 4d, the thoughts of other ppl, etc).
So my question is: WHICH IS IT THEN?
Because I KNOW, instant manifestation is possible, 'cause you can materialize $1billion in your bank account or revise a drastic appearance change in seconds, but I just don't understand what exactly these ppl mean by "you're results are always instant. you just can't see them in your 3d right now".
(idk, maybe I need to stop reading just EVERY & ALL blogs 'cause even though most of the info is the same, maybe I'm just getting confused by how differently everyone explains it😭)
hi lovely!
I was thinking of making a post like this so i am very glad you asked :)
firstly let’s talk about the instantaneous aspect:
The difference is internally vs externally. Internally is instantaneous, and externally (3d) can be instantaneous but people tend to be too busy looking for the desire and thereby internalising not having it. Thus 3D also will reflect not having it. The 3D will instantly start bringing it you though.
If you order a package from (some place far away) and cannot see the package in your hands rn you don’t start saying ‘it isn’t mine’, you know it is yours and on its way to you. Whether you focus on it being yours, or it being on the way to you doesn’t matter, both ways you know it is yours.
Essentially as soon as you decide you have your desire, or start affirming for it, you have your desire internally. Since the 3D is a reflection of your internal world, your dominant thoughts / assumptions, it instantly starts to manifest physically, bringing your desire - understand that your desire can come about in all kinds of ways (the unfolding) . Mountains will move if they need to for. Honestly as soon as you internalise the decision that you manifest instantly - you can. But if the way you ‘try’ to manifest instantly is by saying your affirmation then looking everywhere in your 3D for it, you aren’t understanding manifestation. it’ll come to you - literally in seconds - but looking for it is what is gonna make it not manifest, because looking for it is just reaffirming the dominant thought / state or identity of you not having it. Like seriously just let it come to you, it will.
do not allow the 3d to tell you what you can and cannot have, since it is only a mirror of you.
Now this is what feeds into the idea of ‘waiting reaffirming you don’t have it’
Yes, if you sit around waiting, staring at your phone for the text from your sp and only thinking about how it isn’t there - you are reaffirming you don’t have it. I personally do not believe this is the same thing as using “i will receive” (or just future tense affirmations) as long as you claim you have it internally, or you are saturating your mind with the knowing it is becoming yours. (this really depends on if you’re more of a states / feeler person or robotic affirmations person) at the end of the day in both scenarios the only thing preventing you from not manifesting the outcome you want (you receiving your desire) is telling yourself it’s not / never will be yours. Whether that is because you don’t see it right now or because of how you value(d) yourself in relation to your desire whatever.
So quick answer: I will be/have vs i am/have both work unless you’re gonna overcomplicate it in your mind and say they don’t. I think there are benefits to saying *desire* manifested instantly etc as your affirmation because it’ll saturate your brain with the idea that the 3D conforms instantly which is good :)
This being said, don’t demonize coaches who give example affirmations etc following a certain method/ affirmation type. Coaches / loass content creators typically are only gonna give you advice based on what worked for them, and usually if they find something that works they’ll stick with it yk, so their advice is biased to their success. And that is FINE but other methods / affirmations still work :)
Since LoAss is so broad and works for people in so many different ways (states, affirmations, visualisation, scripting) some loa coaches / cc are going to give cookie cutter routines etc to follow based on their success. As a result you may find clashing advice to follow when it gets down to specifics of different coaches’ methods. This does NOT mean that one does work and one doesn’t, they BOTH work. Just take a step back and bring it back to the basics. Avoid overconsumption.
What works?
- saturating your mind either with a state of being/ identity or affirmations
- Knowing you validate the 3D, it does not validate you
What is the only must?
- Persistance
So to summarise + a bit more
internal manifestation is instant, 3D will reflect that unless you start waivering / returning to previous dominant thought / state of being / identity that you don’t have your desire. As soon as you make the decision the you have your desire, 3D reality is working on bringing it to you so that it can reflect you correctly, until your desire is in your hands you do NOT take anything in the 3D as a sign of you not having it.
You don’t have to affirm that your desire manifests instantly - just saying you have it or are getting it doesn’t push it away - but it certainly won’t hurt :)
Try not to get too caught up on the specifics on how 10 different coaches manifest, most people don’t follow the exact same way of doing it, the thing that remains the same is some type of internal saturation. Manifestation is broad and there are so many methods to help you saturate your mind so just cause person A likes affirming “i love my blue porsche”, person B likes affirming “i am receiving a blue porsche 911 cayenne” and person C hates affirming but enjoys visualising themselves driving the porsche and embodying the feeling of having it, doesn’t mean any of them are doing it wrong, it just means they all found what works for them.
Not to sound like every manifestation blog ever but there comes a time when it’s time to stop reading/overconsuming and to start just applying. The world is your oyster as long as you allow yourself to believe it to be true.
I hope this helped answer your question and if it didn’t (embarrassing) please feel free to message me / clarify in a new ask and i will correct myself haha.
Love,
Saph
25 notes · View notes
hyperromanticisation · 2 months
Text
Is there an expiry date on making a wish on a rainbow? And by that I don't mean "am I supposed to outgrow wishing on rainbows", but "how long do I have for my wish to come true"?
1 note · View note
Text
0 notes