Tumgik
#language is a social construct
tinypaperwindmill · 11 months
Text
The French word "genre" means:
"Genre" as in movie genre
"Gender" as in both people's and nouns' genders and
"Like" as in "omg, like, that's so cool!"
So my theory is the word "gender" came from a word that actually just means a category out of many categories. It means "this thing is similar other things." It amazes me that the French recognized only two genders for so long while art had a hundred and expressions had a million. Like, the etymology of it all, ya know?
0 notes
art-of-mathematics · 28 days
Text
Tumblr media
21 notes · View notes
rationalisms · 2 months
Text
finding out that most people consider "arriving around seven" to mean no later than like 7:15 and anything later is rude or requires an excuse has absolutely blown my mind. in my culture "around seven" can mean absolutely anything from seven on the dot to roughly located within the same general year.
11 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
Social constructivism is a social construct.
12 notes · View notes
vitruvianmanbara · 7 months
Text
you could make a long, well-structured, thoroughly cited argument about how it's legally and socially dangerous in the long run to over-attribute complex human behavior like sexuality to simplistic biological concepts, let alone ones that rest on flimsy & incomplete science, and someone would still hop on your dick to say that questioning that approach is something too socially & politically dangerous to even carefully discuss within gay spaces in this current political climate. and it's been this way for like 30 years. sad!
22 notes · View notes
Text
The "P" Stands for Pre-trained
I know I've said this before, but since we're going to be hearing increasingly more about Elon Musk and his "Anti-Woke" "A.I." "Truth GPT" in the coming days and weeks, let's go ahead and get some things out on the table:
All technology is political. All created artifacts are rife with values.
I keep trying to tell you that the political right understands this when it suits them— when they can weaponize it; and they're very VERY good at weaponizing it— but people seem to keep not getting it. So let me say it again, in a somewhat different way:
There is no ground of pure objectivity. There is no god's-eye view.
There is no purely objective thing. Pretending there is only serves to create the conditions in which the worst people can play "gotcha" anytime they can clearly point to their enemies doing what we are literally all doing ALL THE TIME: Creating meaning and knowledge out of what we value, together.
Read the rest of The "P" Stands for Pre-trained at A Future Worth Thinking About
54 notes · View notes
Text
Saying “people with uteruses” is NOT erasing women any more than saying “all humans are created equal” is erasing men.
18 notes · View notes
the-trans-dragon · 1 month
Note
https://www.tumblr.com/mousegirlheart/712995877228298240/mouse-yaoi-real
Idk it seems ciscentered, trans excluding to treat “male mice” like a coherent thing — rather than some construct we assign to them like how we assign it with amab people — and then further to conflate 2 male mice together as being yaoi and gay… it reinforces being “male” (amab) as a biological thing not something to do with gender and identity.
Tumblr media
Hmmm... I can't seem to see things from your perspective. Is the only issue that it says "mouse yaoi real"?
I reblogged because it's incredibly cool that it happened! It helps dissolve our rigid ideas of sex, in my opinion. One of the biggest trans-exclusionary arguments in my current culture is "women are women because they can bear children," which ties into the ever-present homophobic argument of "homosexuality is wrong because it cannot produce offspring."
The ramifications for this sort of thing are still "up in the air," so to speak, since experiments with mice cannot always be replicated in humans. But the ability to create a viable offspring from a same-sex pair of mammalian model organisms is still a big break-through, especially because of the implications of creating an egg with two X chromosomes from a male skin cell with only one X chromosome! As the CNN article itself explains,
"The proof-of-concept research, the culmination of years of pain-staking lab work, could expand the possibilities for future fertility treatments, including for same-sex couples, and perhaps help prevent the extinction of endangered animals. "
The ability to create viable offspring from "male" cells is a direct wound to the idea that "male" is a rigid characteristic. If I allow myself to daydream, I can ponder other possibilities: could you turn "male" skin cells into other cells? Could a trans woman one day have her own cells used to grow a uterus? Growing entire organs is a wholly different feat, compared to creating a single gamete, with difficulties such as incorporating it into a pre-existing organism (eg, even if you could grow a uterus, could you get it connected to the circulatory system?). It's a far-off daydream, thanks to the current culture's fear of research that questions it's rigid ideas of sex and gender. But it's a daydream that comes closer to being reality when science achieves breakthroughs like this!
I am being overly hopeful. Science is very slow to make progress in regards to sex. Progress is discouraged and poorly funded, and can even be destroyed, such as with the Hirshfield Institution. But seeing science make progress like this, despite the hostile culture, gives me hope in itself.
It's unfortunate that our current vocabulary is inadequate and rife with bias that assumes everything is cisgender, heterosexual, and perisex. In our efforts to understand the unbiased nature of sex, it's important to examine our views for these issues. Does "mouse yaoi real" contribute to cis-centric, trans-exclusionary biases? I dunno. No. Yeah. Sure. It doesn't matter. Or maybe it does.
Anyways, the science is really really really really cool. I have other thoughts on the matter, but my vocabulary feels inadequate to verbalize them, and instead I am just taking a moment here to talk about the science a little, explain how it can be utilized as a step towards trans healthcare, and emphasize the importance of celebrating these things.
5 notes · View notes
sam-ph · 3 months
Text
Saw a post about grammatical gender and other languages than English, (the origin of the discussion begins with "what if alien languages didn't have gender information in their pronouns" and the fact that many people didn't know much of languages outside english (so I suppose they weren't very original in their what ifs..))
BUT ANYWAY
This is a tangent to talk about grammatical gender in "Faunish" which doesn't ever appear in Spellworth or won't be ever mentioned but is still canon in my mind.
Here are the grammatical genders:
Faun
Inanimate-1 (small related)
Inanimate-2 (big related)
Animate pronouns (almost all of animals, some plants and some concepts like the sun)
... still interested ? I have to say there is light spoiler ahead about where the fauns come from, which is kinda a big question in Spellworth, but if you're not afraid, you can go on
Other people (non fauns) : "displaced" (aka they are in the fauns world)
Other people (non fauns) : the rest, who are in their own worlds and interacts with fauns through portals/spell circles
Now... they still have social genders, and they're not perfect, some fauns may not identify with any of them or several, but this is not the norm. Here they are:
those who birthed a child (1st gender)
those who didn't (2nd gender)
those who didn't but extensively care for them (3rd gender)
First gender are usually those in power (yeah, kinda "matriarchal" society, even if the concept is not a 1-1 from english).
Fun fact, in Spellworth, the people usually interacting with fauns traditionally use she/her for fauns of the first gender and he/him for fauns of the second gender, regardless of their phenotype (also... they don't interact much with fauns of the 3rd gender... they don't even know it exists). The fauns could not care less how they are referred to in english.
5 notes · View notes
fiapple · 2 months
Text
but also like literally want to emphasize the “including other trans people” part of that last addition. like there is a reason the times i’ve personally written posts about the issues with how tmes speak over transfems regarding transmisogyny in the name of “having our own terms” or the issues with the trans mra movement, i get anons positioning my motives within the realm of trans women’s fuckability by other tme people. & that’s still nothing compared to what transfeminine users on here go through while trying to self advocate .
4 notes · View notes
circumplural · 3 months
Text
slur discourse is very silly
2 notes · View notes
bewitched-bullet · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
4 notes · View notes
lindwurmkai · 4 months
Text
you know ... i've made a fool of myself on the internet quite a few times in my life. i've said some pretty bizarre things, some of which went way beyond simple "brain farts" and in fact may have been signs of serious mental issues.
to name some examples of shit my brain has done:
experienced something akin to age regression complete with temporarily lacking knowledge and skills i normally possess. sometimes the missing knowledge was replaced with alternate "facts" that were straight-up wrong, yet for the duration of this state (usually just one day), i was convinced i was making sense.
badly misinterpreted someone's words because they tripped a trauma trigger and i was only self-aware enough to recognise that my emotions were disproportionate, but not that my judgement was impaired.
leaps in logic and outlandish claims that seemed reasonable to me at the time, but a week or a month later, i began to feel like i must have been on the verge of psychosis to come up with such nonsense. (does anyone remember "people in the past didn't experience sexual attraction the way we do because they wore different clothes"?????)
and that's in addition to regular brain fog, sleep deprivation logic, taking things too literally because i'm autistic, or simply ... being wrong. for normal reasons.
but every time there is an "abnormal" reason, i find myself hoping that anyone who witnessed it understands i wasn't just being stupid. because even in this day and age, too many people still look down on stupidity as if it were a choice. for a while it got a little better on the internet, at least in my circles, but then we experienced a great renaissance of "focusing on language distracts from the real issues" logic and suddenly no one cared anymore. even though it was never about the exact language used, but about the underlying devaluation of people with low IQs and anyone else perceived as stupid.
so i catch myself thinking, "it wasn't stupidity. i was triggered. i hope they understand that and don't unfollow me for being stupid." but that's shitty of me, too, isn't it? i am not better than people with intellectual disabilities or brain damage because my "stupidity" is more transient. it's not an expression of my personal opinion though, it's an expression of what i fear other people may think. and i will never be able to shake that fear as long as people keep complaining about stupidity like it's a moral failing.
there is immense privilege in my ability to look back on these episodes and recognise them as temporary. is someone who would look down on people who are permanently like that really my friend, though?
if you can't handle me at my "making no fucking sense", you don't deserve me at my "flash of brilliance during hyperfocus" tbh.
4 notes · View notes
Text
The double edged sword of "these rules are all made up and hold no inherent value" but "they still affect how people understand, experience and interact with the world every single day"
3 notes · View notes
limetarte · 9 months
Text
Waiting for the time more people realize that we don’t have to follow made up rules and never change them.
We can change definitions as much as we want, we don’t have to follow definitions either.
Why limit ourselves to made up rules?
We don’t have to follow social constructs. We can make new things up too.
3 notes · View notes
crystallinecryptid · 1 year
Text
took me way too long to realize cis kids probably didn’t start yelling SOCIAL CONSTRUCT whenever someone asked about their gender online.
3 notes · View notes