Note: Turkish,English,German and Arabic description
🇹🇷🦋Yanak inceltme yada popüler adıyla ‘Hollywood yanağı’da denilen ameliyat kısa süreli,kalıcı, etkin ve sonuçları çok başarılıdır.
🦋Buccal Fat Pad (BFP)Removal ,Partial buccal lipectomy, Hollywood yanağı, yanak yağı aldırma,yanak inceltme gibi isimlendirilir.
🦋Temel amaç yuvarlak, kare yada geniş yanaklı, elmacık kemiği(zigoma/malar bölge) çıkıntılı olmayan yüzü ince görünmeyen kişilere yapılabilir.
🦋En sık kadınlara yapılsada son yıllarda erkekler de tercih etmektedir.
🦋Yanakta bulunan bu yap yastığını ilk olarak 1732’de Heister tanımlamıştır.
🦋1802’de M.F.X.Bichat anatomik yapısını ayrıntılı açıklamıştır.
🦋Dr.Bichat adıyla anılan ‘Bichat yağ yastığı’ 4 uzantıya ve 3 ayrı loba ayrılır.
🦋Posterior(arka) lob; temporal, ptergoid, ptergopalatin be bukkal kısımlardan oluşur.
🦋Ameliyat tekniği: lokal anestezi genelde yeterli olup iki taraflı üst çene(maksilla) lateral(dış) mukozasından 5-10 mm’lik insizyon yapılarak ‘fatpad’in %40-50’i çıkartılır.
🦋Ortalama volüm 6mm kayıptır( kadınlarda 7.2-10.8 mm ve erkeklerde 7.8-11.3 mm).
🦋Bu miktardan fazla çıkartmalarda yanakta çökme ve/ veya asimetri oluşabilir.
🦋Bu ameliyatı bazı otorler 25 yaş sonrası için önerirler.
🦋Ameliyat süresi 20-40 dakikadır.
🦋Ameliyattan hemen sonra belirgin görüntü oluşsa da 2-3 hafta ödem/şişlik görülmesi doğaldır.
🦋7-10 gün korse kullanımı, antibiyotik, ağrı kesici, gargara ve ağız hijyeni önerilir.
🦋Genelde dikiş alınmasına gerek yoktur 1 haftada eriyecektir.
🦋İdeal görünüm 2-4 ayda ortaya çıkar.
🦋Deneyimli cerrahlarda komplikasyon minimaldir.
🦋Bazı araştırmalarda komplikasyon %8.45 bildirilmiştir.
🦋Bu komplikasyonlar; ödem, kanama(internal maksiller arter), enfeksiyon, asimetri, trismus, fasial sinir bukkal dal yaralanması, paratis bezi stenson kanal yaralanması sayılabilir.
Kaynak;
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6051676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK576413/
Note: Turkish,English,German and Arabic description
🇻🇬🦋Cheek thinning, or popularly known as 'Hollywood cheek' surgery, is short-term, permanent, effective and its results are very successful.
🦋Buccal Fat Pad (BFP) Removal, Partial buccal lipectomy, Hollywood cheek, cheek fat removal, cheek thinning.
🦋The main purpose is that it can be performed on people with round, square or wide cheeks, without protruding cheekbones (zygoma/malar area), and whose face does not look thin.
🦋Although it is most commonly performed on women, men have also preferred it in recent years.
🦋Heister first described this cheek pad in 1732.
🦋In 1802, M.F.X.Bichat explained its anatomical structure in detail.
🦋The 'Bichat fat pad', also known as Dr. Bichat, is divided into 4 extensions and 3 separate lobes.
🦋Posterior lobe; It consists of temporal, pterygoid, pterygopalatine and buccal parts.
🦋Surgery technique: local anesthesia is generally sufficient and 40-50% of the 'fatpad' is removed by making a 5-10 mm incision in the lateral (external) mucosa of the bilateral upper jaw (maxilla).
🦋The average volume loss is 6 mm (7.2-10.8 mm in women and 7.8-11.3 mm in men).
🦋Decals exceeding this amount may cause sagging and/or asymmetry on the cheek.
🦋Some authorities recommend this surgery for people after the age of 25.
🦋Surgery time is 20-40 minutes.
🦋Although a clear appearance occurs immediately after the surgery, it is natural to see edema/swelling for 2-3 weeks.
🦋 7-10 days of corset use, antibiotics, painkillers, mouthwash and oral hygiene are recommended.
🦋 Generally, there is no need to remove stitches, it will dissolve in 1 week.
🦋The ideal appearance appears in 2-4 months.
🦋Complications are minimal in experienced surgeons.
🦋In some studies, complications were reported as 8.45%.
🦋These complications; edema, bleeding (internal maxillary artery), infection, asymmetry, trismus, facial nerve buccal branch injury, paratis gland Stenson canal injury.
Source;
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6051676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK576413/
Hinweis: Türkische, englische, deutsche und arabische Beschreibung
🇩🇪🦋Eine Wangenverdünnung, im Volksmund auch „Hollywood-Wangenoperation“ genannt, ist kurzfristig, dauerhaft, effektiv und die Ergebnisse sind sehr erfolgreich.
🦋Entfernung des bukkalen Fettpolsters (BFP), partielle bukkale Lipektomie, Hollywood-Wange, Wangenfettentfernung, Wangenverdünnung.
🦋Der Hauptzweck besteht darin, dass es bei Menschen mit runden, eckigen oder breiten Wangen durchgeführt werden kann, ohne hervorstehende Wangenknochen (Jochbein-/Malarbereich) und deren Gesicht nicht dünn aussieht.
🦋Obwohl es am häufigsten bei Frauen durchgeführt wird, bevorzugen es in den letzten Jahren auch Männer.
🦋Heister beschrieb dieses Wangenpolster erstmals im Jahr 1732.
🦋Im Jahr 1802 erklärte M.F.X.Bichat seine anatomische Struktur im Detail.
🦋Das „Bichat-Fettpolster“, auch Dr. Bichat genannt, ist in 4 Fortsätze und 3 separate Lappen unterteilt.
🦋Hinterlappen; Es besteht aus temporalen, pterygoidealen, pterygopalatinalen und bukkalen Teilen.
🦋Operationstechnik: Lokalanästhesie ist im Allgemeinen ausreichend und 40–50 % des „Fettpolsters“ werden durch einen 5–10 mm langen Schnitt in der seitlichen (äußeren) Schleimhaut des beidseitigen Oberkiefers (Oberkiefer) entfernt.
🦋Der durchschnittliche Volumenverlust beträgt 6 mm (7,2–10,8 mm bei Frauen und 7,8–11,3 mm bei Männern).
🦋Abziehbilder, die diese Menge überschreiten, können zu Durchhängen und/oder Asymmetrien auf der Wange führen.
🦋Einige Behörden empfehlen diese Operation für Personen nach dem 25. Lebensjahr.
🦋Die Operationszeit beträgt 20-40 Minuten.
🦋Obwohl unmittelbar nach der Operation ein klares Erscheinungsbild auftritt, ist es natürlich, dass für 2-3 Wochen Ödeme/Schwellungen auftreten.
🦋 7-10 Tage Korsetttragen, Antibiotika, Schmerzmittel, Mundwasser und Mundhygiene werden empfohlen.
🦋 Im Allgemeinen ist es nicht nötig, die Fäden zu entfernen, sie lösen sich innerhalb einer Woche auf.
🦋Das ideale Aussehen stellt sich in 2-4 Monaten ein.
🦋Komplikationen sind bei erfahrenen Chirurgen minimal.
🦋In einigen Studien wurden Komplikationen mit 8,45 % angegeben.
🦋Diese Komplikationen; Ödeme, Blutungen (Arteria maxillaris interna), Infektionen, Asymmetrie, Trismus, Verletzung des Wangenasts des Gesichtsnervs, Verletzung des Stenson-Kanals der Paratisdrüse.
Quelle;
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6051676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK576413/
ملحوظة: الوصف باللغات التركية والإنجليزية والألمانية والعربية
🇮🇶🦋تنحيف الخد أو المعروفة شعبياً باسم "جراحة خد هوليوود" هي عملية قصيرة الأمد ودائمة وفعالة ونتائجها ناجحة جداً.
🦋إزالة وسادة دهون الخد (BFP)، استئصال شحم الشدق الجزئي، خد هوليود، إزالة دهون الخد، تنحيف الخد.
🦋الغرض الرئيسي هو أنه يمكن إجراؤها على الأشخاص ذوي الخدود المستديرة أو المربعة أو العريضة، دون عظام الخد البارزة (منطقة الوجنة / الوجنات)، والذين لا يبدو وجههم نحيفًا.
🦋على الرغم من أنه يتم إجراؤه بشكل شائع على النساء، إلا أن الرجال يفضلونه أيضًا في السنوات الأخيرة.
🦋وصف هيستر وسادة الخد هذه لأول مرة في عام 1732.
🦋في عام 1802، شرح M.F.X.Bichat بنيته التشريحية بالتفصيل.
🦋تنقسم "وسادة الدهون بيشات"، المعروفة أيضًا باسم دكتور بيشات، إلى 4 ملحقات و3 فصوص منفصلة.
🦋الفص الخلفي. وهو يتألف من الأجزاء الصدغية والجناحية والجناحية الحنكية والشدق.
🦋تقنية الجراحة: التخدير الموضعي كافٍ بشكل عام ويتم إزالة 40-50% من "السادة الدهنية" عن طريق إجراء شق 5-10 ملم في الغشاء المخاطي الجانبي (الخارجي) للفك العلوي الثنائي (الفك العلوي).
🦋متوسط فقدان الحجم هو 6 ملم (7.2-10.8 ملم عند النساء و7.8-11.3 ملم عند الرجال).
🦋الملصقات التي تتجاوز هذه الكمية قد تسبب ترهل و/أو عدم تناسق في الخد.
🦋توصي بعض السلطات بإجراء هذه الجراحة للأشخاص بعد سن 25 عامًا.
🦋مدة الجراحة 20-40 دقيقة.
🦋على الرغم من ظهور مظهر واضح بعد الجراحة مباشرة، إلا أنه من الطبيعي رؤية الوذمة/التورم لمدة 2-3 أسابيع.
🦋 يوصى باستخدام المشد لمدة 7-10 أيام، ويوصى بالمضادات الحيوية ومسكنات الألم وغسول الفم ونظافة الفم.
🦋 بشكل عام ليس هناك حاجة لإزالة الغرز فهي ستذوب خلال أسبوع واحد.
🦋يظهر المظهر المثالي خلال 2-4 أشهر.
🦋المضاعفات ضئيلة عند الجراحين ذوي الخبرة.
🦋في بعض الدراسات، بلغت نسبة المضاعفات 8.45%.
🦋هذه المضاعفات؛ وذمة، نزيف (الشريان الفكي الداخلي)، عدوى، عدم تناسق، ضزز، إصابة فرع الشدق في العصب الوجهي، إصابة قناة ستنسون في الغدة النظيرية.
مصدر؛
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6051676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK576413/
2 notes
·
View notes
Use of Sphenopalatine Ganglion Blockade in Chronic Migraine Management
Authored by Michelle Androulakis
Case Report
Chronic migraine (CM) is a debilitating neurological disorder which affects more than 4 million individuals in the United State and 2% of the global population [1] in 2015, the Health Care utilization was estimated at $5.4 billion and the total cost associated with management of comorbidities exceeded over $40 billion in united states [2,3]. Different acute and preventive therapies, which are available for chronic migraineurs, are generally sub-optimally effective and are accompanied by side effects that are difficult to tolerate. Currently, Botulinum toxin therapy (Botox) is the only FDA approved CM preventative therapy, however, it is expensive and up to 9% of patients experience side effects such as neck pain after the injections. Recently, SPG neuromodulation has gained interest among headache specialist in management of CM. A series of SPG blockade using intranasal bupivacaine was efficacious for acute pain reduction in CM. However, further investigation into the long term preventative benefit of SPG block is warranted as this study sample size was too small to reach its statistical significance [4,5].
Sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) has been a very important target for headache management since the beginning of the 20th century. SPG is the largest extra cranially ganglion of the head and is likely to play an important role in migraine pathogenesis through the activation of trigemino-autonomic reflex [6]. Up to 70% of migraine patients have cranial autonomic symptoms such as eyelid edema, nasal congestion, lacrimation, conjunctival injection, rhinorrhea, and facial swelling [7]. SPG modulation via electrical stimulation, microvascular decompression, surgical or radiofrequency ablation, and radiosurgical lesion have been performed for head pain in operating room settings, however, adverse effects of these interventions can be extensive. The SPG is located just posterior/superior to the tail of the middle turbinate on the lateral nasal wall and superior to the pterygopalatine fossa.
Manipulation of this region was often very challenging, as there is no direct access to the SPG and it is covered by a thin layer of nasal mucosa (1-1.5mm). New methods to modulate the SPG with a topical, intranasal approach have proven to be among the safest, least invasive, and least costly of all SPG interventions in headache management.
Recently, several new devices have been developed which facilitate a more accurate and effective delivery of the local anesthetics into the SPG. The risks of this procedure are typically minimal and may include minor discomfort during and after the procedure, a numbing or burning sensation, bitter taste from the anesthesia, bleeding from the nose (rarely), and lightheadedness. These side effects typically resolve within minutes to a few hours. There is also a very small risk of allergic reactions.
Use of SPG block has been recommended by American Headache Society (AHS) as part of comprehensive headache management plan. Indeed, repetitive SPG blockade twice a week for 6 weeks provides an alternative migraine prophylaxis for those with chronic migraine but could not tolerate (i.e. needle phobia) or unresponsive to Botox therapy. SPG block generally provides a better outcome for treatment of CM with head pain in frontal and/orbital regions, and may also help CM patients with coexisting medication overuse headaches to wean off excessive use of pain medications.
Nausea, which has been suggested as one of the main contributing factors for migraine chronification, is also another possible symptom that can be relieved with a series of SPG block. The area postrema area, located at the infer posterior part of IV ventricle, is responsible for nausea and vomiting through its connection to the nucleus of the solitary tract. The superior salivatory nucleus (SSN) provides preganglionic parasympathetic innervation to SPG, but also receives inputs from multiple areas, such as nucleus of solitary tract, limbic, and cortical regions. Repetitive intranasal SPG blockade with bupivacaine may reduce nausea and vomiting via inhibition of superior salivatory nucleus given its direct connection with the nucleus of solitary tract.
The exact mechanism of SPG neuro modulation remains to be elucidated. It has been postulated that inhibition of the parasympathetic outflow from the SPG would inhibit pain and autonomic symptoms that accompanying recurrent migraine attacks. This inhibition of parasympathetic outflow would decrease activation of perivascular nociceptors in the cranial and meningeal vasculature, especially in the frontal regions of the brain [8-10]. Additionally, modulation of the SPG may in turn modulate brain networks activity involved in pain processing. In a recent resting state functional MRI connectivity study, our group demonstrated that a series of SPG block treatment in chronic migraine significantly improved two intrinsic resting state functional connectivity networks (manuscript in preparation). This increase in functional connectivity coherence may represent that after effective treatment, reorganization of resting state brain networks to normalized states may occur.
Additionally, reduced parasympathetic outflow due to repetitive SPG inhibition may help to restore baseline homeostasis of brain networks involved in pain processing, via improved mesocorticolimbic modulation [11-13]. A large double blinded, randomized, placebo controlled clinical trial is warranted to evaluate the efficacy of repetitive SPG block in CM (Figure 1 & 2).
For more open access journals in juniper publishers please click https://juniperpublishers.com/
For more articles on Open Access Journal of Neurology & Neurosurgery Please click on https://juniperpublishers.com/oajnn/
Open Access Journal of Neurology & Neurosurgery in Full text in Juniper Publishers
0 notes