Tumgik
#manipulate men series
kingess · 1 year
Text
Inspired by the dozen of anons the spiritually psychotic lady sent,
I'd like to share another chef's kiss manipulation hack with you;
Keep track of the insults the desired target uses when they're triggered.
Towards you, or someone else. Even if he's not directly verbally abusive the things he looks down upon on you or others will slip through. That's his insecurity.
When we're flustered or triggered or even just stressed and the aggression leaks out, our brain's first motive is to attack emotionally, to keep us safe. Most people aren't quick or deranged enough to hurt others with what hurts the opponent specifically custom taylored routinely. The brain asks 'what's hurtful?' and picks what your unique experience has concluded most hurtful; Aka your insecurities.
This in mind you can bring him up, or tear him down effortlessly & innocently when suitable.
Tumblr media
262 notes · View notes
jazzypeeps · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
I just know he’d stare at you and wont budge until you give him exactly what he wants.
I also think he’d rub your hips and thighs every time you wear low rise jeans and a crop top (or anything in general).
I need him.
86 notes · View notes
Text
Do current Marvel Writers hate Professor Xavier or something?
10 notes · View notes
thefawnfallacy · 13 days
Text
I’m thinking about Hannibal and Mischa and how Hannibal is a monster but before he was a monster, he was still this growing thing trying very hard to fit into his human skin that simply ceased speaking because the brain was a monster but the heart was just a very small, very sad boy who loved his sister and then perhaps, hated his sister for making him feel the things she did when her death was used to nourish his body.
7 notes · View notes
hozukitofu · 2 years
Text
no better comedy than the immoral villainous seemingly irredeemable cousin going from 'no one will love me i am a monster inside' to domestically raising kids with his sort-of-enemy maybe former-tortured-prisoner and the whole time he's STRICKEN with wtf is even happening are we in love? are we married? is this a ride to die?? can't even call this a speedrun bc the speed at which events had happened is so jarring it tore the fabric holding fragile realities together.
did they date? unsure, uncertain, no one is going to ASK they like their heads where those are thanks. does anyone know what's happening? not even these guys know and they're coparenting while yearning at pathetic ASTRONOMICAL levels. something something repressed guilt pride severe doubt and insecurity inferiority complexes. also one day you're torturing this guy and the next week he's taking your brother to school and folding your collective household laundry, there is not a set of vocabulary that can express how fast everything had been going and you're thinking 'this is why people stay in marriages bc the fall out is terrible, the paperwork the bureaucracy the courts the law the custody battles. not saying this will be me bc i chose to be shackled as love's slave but objectively this is some truly scary shit' and you're saying this as someone who ripped out tongues the other night
meanwhile the other guy is just too smug about it all. it is also possible that he may have orchestrated events so it seems all coincidental. sometimes a man gets tired of being gunned down at the ripe old age of 20-something and says fuck it i'll raise a teenager and a disgraced former heir of a criminal empire it'll be like my old job less blood more laundry. nobody checks in with him this much when he was doing a good job bodyguarding so now he thrives in bickering with his former captor in an ikea-renovated kitchen in the suburbs about how much spice is tolerable in a dish (mediocre cooking) while said captor is fretting over him in barely-repressed yearning and pathetic adoration. pete is too asian and polite to bring it up but sometimes he's like yeah this dude truly was swinging above his weight when he landed me. 'im the sucker that was baited by his pretty face. now i trap him in marriage and love. it's fair enough'
unstoppable force (one man's cringe and deep asian shame) vs immovable object (another man's equally asian grudge and paying even)
eventually vegas confronts pete about baby trapping him (the baby is macau) and pete saying no YOU DID that is YOUR baby YOU trapped ME so they keep this up for a while until macau interrupts like I TRAPPED BOTH OF YOU CAN YOU PLEASE GO MAKE OUT AND BE NORMAL.
IKEA renovated kitchen was inspired by this entire FIC please love and shower the author with flowers and rice. it finishes today i got the email notif and ducked out from work to read it in a corner i have normal feelings about god's creation
190 notes · View notes
ladykatie512 · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
V: What do you want?!
J: I’ve processed some shit, changed my mind. Don’t want you dead anymore.
V: Go fuck yourself, dickwipe!
93 notes · View notes
thatsashitplan · 1 year
Text
xavier being on the “clown” team is so fitting and actually satisfying
82 notes · View notes
cafwins · 1 year
Text
“payu is manipulative--” and hot so where do we go from here 🥱
41 notes · View notes
pansy2005 · 8 months
Text
writing a dissertation on the irreparable damage the tiger king docuseries and the timing of its release did to our society
17 notes · View notes
glamgoblin · 2 years
Text
Okay so we can all agree Todd and Vegas would make the best exes right?
19 notes · View notes
perenlop · 1 year
Text
this is not a fair comparison at all bc a lot of animes are misogynistic and pmmm definitely has its issues regarding this i wont deny and also theyre different audiences, but its funny how people say its a shitty misogynistic show that hates young girls and stuff bc sad things happen in the tragedy show, meanwhile the pokemon anime i watch aimed at young kids basically has serena competing to see how good of a housewife she can be and no one really mentions that
6 notes · View notes
kingess · 1 year
Note
I loved your post on how to hunt a man. That was lovely, any tips on how to stay safe emotionally when engaging in this?
This is such an important question!
It's an emotionally unsafe practice. It's especially dangerous if you're not 100% clear about your intentions. It can get easily mixed up if you don't cluster them into a job folder in your head, dehumanized. I mainly give tips on vetting men for real relationship purposes so be very mindful that manipulating men is not to gain their love. When you're manipulating them you're not in your feminine frame. Manipulating them is inherently masculine as you chase, court and pursue them for whatever purpose and way. It should ALWAYS be the man that pursues you when you seek something with emotions. I can't say I recommend it, but girls deserve the access to all their options.
So, how can you protect yourself?
Make sure to tune in with your intuition to see you're doing it for the right reason.
Have a roster of males that allows you to forget the individual ones to the point of forgetting who's even texted you and who hasn't.
Copy paste the same messages to all of them and occasionally be personal to boost their feelings.
Do Not get stuck on one for too long no matter how good and easy it is. Time builds attachment, even for a trained mind.
Make sure you're truly unavailable with your time, they love it and it makes it easier to forget about them in your daily life.
Meditate and practise self-love after your Oscar winning performances to cleanse from their negative energy and to remind yourself you're solely emotionally available for healed masculine men.
If you catch yourself thinking "maybe this could develop into something real" do an immediate self intervention and find the self-respect to run. The ones vulnerable to these tactics are unhealed weaklings you don't want to settle with.
I can guide you on how to naturally attract the healthy ones too, until then,
Happy hunting babes ♡
211 notes · View notes
holyjanolli · 2 years
Text
FUCK lorelai gilmore honestly
11 notes · View notes
inkykeiji · 2 years
Text
re-reading flowers in the attic + petals on the wind as an adult (as opposed to a teenager) was really interesting. i saw cathy and her struggles in an entirely different light, especially in regards to the way chris treats her! when i was a teenager i felt more sympathetic towards chris and his unshakeable love for his sister but now, as an adult, i can see how truly obsessive and emotionally manipulative he really was!!! he begs and pleads with her, he makes her feel guilty for trying to move on—makes her feel guilty over the fact that he is in love with her and he cannot possibly move on or love anyone nearly as much, as if any of that is cathy’s fault at all—and when she tries to move forward, he sulks jealously and passive aggressively like a big baby! re-reading it with more knowledge and insight has totally changed my perception of him!
10 notes · View notes
lupia · 2 years
Text
Loudermilk: I mean split mind. This monster isn't David. It's a parasite of some kind. You see, another consciousness inside him.
Melanie: What does that mean?
Loudermilk: This thing burrowed into David's brain when he was a boy, maybe even a baby, and has been there, feeding off him ever since.
Ptonomy: The memories?
Loudermilk: Memories, exactly! Every time David sees this thing, or realizes it's there, this creature makes him forget-rewrites his memory.
Buy me a book
Tumblr media
1 note · View note
prokopetz · 20 days
Text
On the one hand, it's true that the way Dungeons & Dragons defines terms like "sorcerer" and "warlock" and "wizard" is really only relevant to Dungeons & Dragons and its associated media – indeed, how these terms are used isn't even consistent between editions of D&D! – and trying to apply them in other contexts is rarely productive.
On the other hand, it's not true that these sorts of fine-grained taxonomies of types of magic are strictly a D&D-ism and never occur elsewhere. That folks make this argument is typically a symptom of being unfamiliar with Dungeons & Dragons' source material. D&D's main inspirations are American literary sword and sorcery fantasy spanning roughly the 1930s through the early 1980s, and fine-grained taxonomies of magic users absolutely do appear in these sources; they just aren't anything like as consistent as the folks who try to cram everything into the sorcerer/warlock/wizard model would prefer.
For example, in Lyndon Hardy's "Five Magics" series, the five types of magical practitioners are:
Alchemists: Drawing forth the hidden virtues of common materials to craft magic potions; limited by the fact that the outcomes of their formulas are partially random.
Magicians: Crafting enchanted items through complex manufacturing procedures; limited by the fact that each step in the procedure must be performed perfectly with no margin for error.
Sorcerers: Speaking verbal formulas to basically hack other people's minds, permitting illusion-craft and mind control; limited by the fact that the exercise of their art eventually kills them.
Thaumaturges: Shaping matter by manipulating miniature models; limited by the need to draw on outside sources like fires or flywheels to make up the resulting kinetic energy deficit.
Wizards: Summoning and binding demons from other dimensions; limited by the fact that the binding ritual exposes them to mental domination by the summoned demon if their will is weak.
"Warlock", meanwhile, isn't a type of practitioner, but does appear as pejorative term for a wizard who's lost a contest of wills with one of their own summoned demons.
Conversely, Lawrence Watt-Evans' "Legends of Ethshar" series includes such types of magic-users as:
Sorcerers: Channelling power through metal talismans to produce fixed effects; in the time of the novels, talisman-craft is largely a lost art, and most sorcerers use found or inherited talismans.
Theurges: Summoning gods; the setting's gods have no interest in human worship, but are bound not to interfere in the mortal world unless summoned, and are thus amenable to cutting deals.
Warlocks: Wielding X-Men style psychokinesis by virtue of their attunement to the telepathic whispers emanating from the wreckage of a crashed alien starship. (They're the edgy ones!)
Witches: Producing improvisational effects mostly related to healing, telepathy, precognition, and minor telekinesis by drawing on their own internal energy.
Wizards: Drawing down the infinite power of Chaos and shaping it with complex rituals. Basically D&D wizards, albeit with a much greater propensity for exploding.
You'll note that both taxonomies include something called a "sorcerer", something called a "warlock", and something called a "wizard", but what those terms mean in their respective contexts agrees neither with the Dungeons & Dragons definitions, nor with each other.
(Admittedly, these examples are from the 1980s, and are thus not free of D&D's influence; I picked them because they both happened to use all three of the terms in question in ways that are at odds with how D&D uses them. You can find similar taxonomies of magic use in earlier works, but I would have had to use many more examples to offer multiple competing definitions of each of "sorcerer", "warlock" and "wizard", and this post is already long enough!)
So basically what I'm saying is giving people a hard time about using these terms "wrong" – particularly if your objection is that they're not using them in a way that's congruent with however D&D's flavour of the week uses them – makes you a dick, but simply having this sort of taxonomy has a rich history within the genre. Wizard phylogeny is a time-honoured tradition!
3K notes · View notes