☝️

A federal judge in Austin on Thursday halted a new state law that would allow Texas police to arrest people suspected of crossing the Texas-Mexico border illegally.

The law, Senate Bill 4, was scheduled to take effect Tuesday. U.S. District Judge David Ezra issued a preliminary injunction that will keep it from being enforced while a court battle continues playing out. Texas is being sued by the federal government and several immigration advocacy organizations. Texas appealed the ruling to the conservative 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Ezra said in his order Thursday that the federal government “will suffer grave irreparable harm” if the law took effect because it could inspire other states to pass their own immigration laws, creating an inconsistent patchwork of rules about immigration, which has historically been upheld as being solely within the jurisdiction of the federal government.

“SB 4 threatens the fundamental notion that the United States must regulate immigration with one voice,” Ezra wrote.

Ezra also wrote that if the state arrested and deported migrants who may be eligible for political asylum, that would violate the Constitution and also be "in violation of U.S. treaty obligations."

"Finally, the Court does not doubt the risk that cartels and drug trafficking pose to many people in Texas," Ezra wrote in his ruling. "But as explained, Texas can and does already criminalize those activities. Nothing in this Order stops those enforcement efforts. No matter how emphatic Texas’s criticism of the Federal Governments handling of immigration on the border may be to some, disagreement with the federal government’s immigration policy does not justify a violation of the Supremacy Clause."

Gov. Greg Abbott signed SB 4 in December, marking Texas’ latest attempt to try to deter people from crossing the Rio Grande after several years of historic numbers of migrants arriving at the Texas-Mexico border.

In a statement, Abbott said the state "will not back down in our fight" and that he expects this case would eventually be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. On social media, he wrote that he is "not worried" because "this was fully expected."

"Texas has solid legal grounds to defend against an invasion," he added.

State Attorney General Ken Paxton, whose office is defending SB 4 in court, said in a statement that he "will do everything possible to defend Texas’s right to defend herself."

The law seeks to make illegally crossing the border a Class B misdemeanor, carrying a punishment of up to six months in jail. Repeat offenders could face a second-degree felony with a punishment of two to 20 years in prison.

The law also seeks to require state judges to order migrants returned to Mexico if they are convicted; local law enforcement would be responsible for transporting migrants to the border. A judge could drop the charges if a migrant agrees to return to Mexico voluntarily.

In December, the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Texas and the Texas Civil Rights Project sued Texas on behalf of El Paso County and two immigrant rights organizations — El Paso-based Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center and Austin-based American Gateways — over the new state law. The following month, the U.S. Department of Justice filed its lawsuit against Texas. The lawsuits have since been combined.

During a court hearing on Feb. 15 in Austin, the Department of Justice argued that SB 4 is unconstitutional because courts have ruled that immigration solely falls under the federal government’s authority.

The lawyer representing Texas, Ryan Walters, argued that the high number of migrants arriving at the border — some of them smuggled by drug cartels — constitutes an invasion and Texas has a right to defend itself under Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits states from engaging in war on their own “unless actually invaded.”

Ezra said that he “is not unsympathetic to the concerns raised by Abbott,” but appeared unconvinced by Walters’ argument.

"I haven't seen, and the state of Texas can't point me to any type of military invasion in Texas," Ezra said. "I don't see evidence that Texas is at war."

Immigrant rights advocates around the state celebrated the ruling because they worried that SB 4 would lead to border residents' rights being violated.

"We celebrate today’s win, blocking this extreme law from going into effect before it has the opportunity to harm Texas communities," said Aron Thorn, senior attorney for the Beyond Border Program at Texas Civil Rights Project. "This is a major step in showing the State of Texas and Governor Abbott that they do not have the power to enforce unconstitutional, state-run immigration policies."

Edna Yang, co-executive director at American Gateways, said that SB 4 does not fix “our broken immigration system” and it will divide communities.

“This decision is a victory for all our communities as it stops a harmful, unconstitutional, and discriminatory state policy from taking effect and impacting the lives of millions of Texans," she said. "Local officials should not be federal immigration agents, and our state should not be creating its own laws that deny people their right to seek protection here in the U.S."

David Donatti, senior staff attorney at the ACLU of Texas, said the ruling is an "important win for Texas values, human rights, and the U.S. Constitution."

"Our current immigration system needs repair because it forces millions of Americans into the shadows and shuts the door on people in need of safety. S.B. 4 would only make things worse," he said. "Cruelty to migrants is not a policy solution.”

Regardless of your political affiliation, always vote at every election. For everything from abortion to minimum wage, the amount of time it takes to vote is minimal in comparison to the impact it will have on your life. People died for the right of universal suffrage. It really is that important.

Deranged, Destitute, and Dishonest Dementia Dummy donnie j. dump Doesn't Get To Be The Republican Presidential Nominee Anymore…Mwahahahahahahahahaa!!! A March 18, 2024 Update For All Political Debate Lovers! Part 7/17

LIDDLE Deranged and Destitute Dishonest Dementia Dummy donnie j. dump refused to debate anyone during the entire Republican primary season, so he's just going to have to wait and see how badly his dementia, senility, extreme poverty, and criminal/constitutional crisis is affecting him for the regular presidential debate schedule.

By the time the first presidential debate comes around on September 16, 2024, LIDDLE Deranged and Destitute Dishonest Dementia Dummy donnie j. dump will be on trial, and will have been on trial, in multiple criminal trials that President Joe Biden can reference during every single debate question.

The second and third presidential debates on October 1 and October 9, 2024 will just be more salt rubbed in the LIDDLE Simpering and Squirming Senile Snake of marred-a-LAME0's fatal wounds.

LIDDLE connie can cry all he wants, but if he'd wanted to debate so badly, he could've done so repeatedly during the Republican primary season! Too bad!

And in Yet Another Installment of "Trash Takes Itself Out": Democrats Warned Republicans They Opened A Pandora's Box of Karmic Payback and that It'd Only Be A Matter of Time… On September 26, 2020, LIDDLE Deranged and Dishonest Dementia Dummy donnie j. dump nominated Barrett to succeed Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court of the United States. Her nomination was controversial because the 2020 presidential election was only 38 days away and Senate Republicans had refused to hold hearings for Merrick Garland during an election year in 2016. The next month, the U.S. Senate voted 52–48 to confirm her nomination, with all Democrats and one Republican in opposition. Barrett was sworn in October 27, 2020. (Wikipedia)

The next time Republicans give themselves a two-week taxpayer-funded vacation during a budget/funding crisis, they need to understand those two weeks are 50% of the time it takes to rush six Real American SCOTUS judge appointments and confirmations through the Senate. Should Republicans choose to force a government shutdown, they need to understand that time could be used to rush six Real American SCOTUS judge appointments and confirmations through the Senate. President Biden put MAGA SCOTUS on notice that Real Americans don't have to put up with their judicial activism, legislating from the bench, and criminal obstruction of justice, illegal constitution modification, and insurrection. Every action and aspect of creation has an equal and opposite within creation; and MAGA SCOTUS will eventually encounter their neutralizing equal; because it's always just a matter of time…

So here's how it's gonna go if it doesn't happen sooner… November 5, 2024: U.S. general and presidential elections.

November 6, 2024, per the Take Care Clause of the U.S. Constitution, President Joe Biden implements the 2024 American Elections Rescue and MAGA Insurrection Prevention Plan to protect the results of the 2024 elections from the six criminal MAGA insurrectionist SCOTUS judges and all of their co-conspirators, enablers, supporters, donors, etc.. On November 6, 2024, just as connie j. chump and his MAGA insurrectionists appointed and confirmed SCOTUS "justice" Barrett in 30 days, so too shall Senate Majority Democrats push through all six MAGA insurrectionist SCOTUS judge replacements and swear them in by December 6, 2024.

The American public will be advised that impeachment proceedings to remove the six criminal MAGA insurrectionist SCOTUS judges will begin immediately on January 3, 2025, but in the meantime, the six Real American Patriot SCOTUS justices will insure that there will be no successful overturning of any popular vote at any county, state, or federal level, no Independent State Legislature nonsense, and no further attempts by the six criminal MAGA insurrectionist SCOTUS judges to overthrow the U.S. government or engage in obstruction of justice, election interference, or any other forms of treason against Real Americans and the U.S. government.

The MAGA cult and MAGA SCOTUS thought they had it all figured out, but MAGA SCOTUS is going to find out real quick that they can and will be prosecuted for obstruction of justice and election tampering and interference just like LIDDLE Cognitively Crippled Crying Cuck connie j. chump.

Democrats prommised the MAGA insurrectionist Republicans the Barrett situation was going to come back around on them; and there's nothing in the U.S. Constitution that limits the number of SCOTUS justices or the amount of SCOTUS justices that can be appointed and confirmed in any presidential term.

And due to the illegal and criminal obstruction of justice, election tampering and interference, illegal constitution modification, and dereliction of duty to uphold and enforce the laws of the United States on ALL people of and in the United States of America, President Joe Biden has no choice but to adhere to and honor his Oath of Office and the Take Care Clause of the U.S. Constitution to counter the corrupted insurrectionist and criminal MAGA SCOTUS poison, disease, and infestation.

The 2024 American Elections Rescue Plan not only saves the United States of America, it also saves Ukraine, Europe and all of America's NATO allies, Africa, South America, Asia, and the the Middle East. And all of that miraculous goodness begins November 6, 2024…

United States Constitution: Clause 5: Caring for the faithful execution of the law (Including enforcing Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution on Congressionally-Determined insurrectionist donald. j. trump: whom through an act of Congress was referred to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution for his January 6, 2021 insurrection and election interference)

The president must "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." This clause in the Constitution imposes a duty on the president to enforce the laws of the United States and is called the Take Care Clause, also known as the Faithful Execution Clause or Faithfully Executed Clause. This clause is meant to ensure that a law is faithfully executed by the president even if he disagrees with the purpose of that law. Addressing the North Carolina ratifying convention, William Maclaine declared that the Faithful Execution Clause was "one of the [Constitution's] best provisions." If the president "takes care to see the laws faithfully executed, it will be more than is done in any government on the continent; for I will venture to say that our government, and those of the other states, are, with respect to the execution of the laws, in many respects mere ciphers." President George Washington interpreted this clause as imposing on him a unique duty to ensure the execution of federal law. Discussing a tax rebellion, Washington observed, "it is my duty to see the Laws executed: to permit them to be trampled upon with impunity would be repugnant to [that duty]."

According to former United States Assistant Attorney General Walter E. Dellinger III, the Supreme Court and the Attorneys General have long interpreted the Take Care Clause to mean that the president has no inherent constitutional authority to suspend the enforcement of the laws, particularly of statutes. The Take Care Clause demands that the president obey the law, the Supreme Court said in Humphrey's Executor v. United States, and repudiates any notion that he may dispense with the law's execution. In Printz v. United States, the Supreme Court explained how the president executes the law: "The Constitution does not leave to speculation who is to administer the laws enacted by Congress; the president, it says, "shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed," Art. II, §3, personally and through officers whom he appoints (save for such inferior officers as Congress may authorize to be appointed by the "Courts of Law" or by "the Heads of Departments" with other presidential appointees), Art. II, §2."

The president may not prevent a member of the executive branch from performing a ministerial duty lawfully imposed upon him by Congress. (See Marbury v. Madison (1803); and Kendall v. United States ex rel. Stokes (1838).) Nor may the president take an action not authorized either by the Constitution or by a lawful statute. (See Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952).) Finally, the president may not refuse to enforce a constitutional law, or "cancel" certain appropriations, for that would amount to an extra-constitutional veto or suspension power. (Wikipedia)

Separation of Church and State!

Phroyd

Rob Rogers

* * * *

LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN

April 16, 2023

HEATHER COX RICHARDSON

APR 17, 2023

A few quick notes tonight about some ongoing stories: There is more news about Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his misreporting of his financial connections. This morning, Shawn Boburg and Emma Brown of the Washington Post reported that for twenty years, Thomas has reported rental income totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars from a real estate firm that was shut down in 2006. The misstatement might be dismissed as a problem with paperwork, the authors note. “But it is among a series of errors and omissions that Thomas has made on required annual financial disclosure forms over the past several decades, a review of those records shows. Together, they have raised questions about how seriously Thomas views his responsibility to accurately report details about his finances to the public.” The cascade of stories about Thomas threatens to continue to undermine the legitimacy of this Supreme Court. Last night, the nation suffered one mass shooting in Dadeville, Alabama, that killed four people and wounded twenty-eight others, and another in Louisville, Kentucky, that killed two and wounded four. On Friday, Republican hopefuls for the 2024 presidential nomination courted members of the National Rifle Association, the NRA, at the organization’s 2023 annual convention, promising looser gun laws. South Dakota governor Kristi Noem complained about liberals who “want to take our guns,” and boasted that her granddaughter, who is not yet two, has a shotgun and a rifle. Meanwhile, the Biden administration continues to focus on rebalancing the Indo-Pacific to counter China. Just two weeks after the fiftieth anniversary of the U.S. withdrawal from Vietnam and nearly thirty years after the restoration of diplomatic ties in 1995, the U.S. has broken ground on a new $1.2 billion embassy compound in the Vietnamese capital of Hanoi. Secretary of State Antony Blinken met with Vietnamese Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh yesterday and vowed to “broaden and deepen” relations between the two countries. Vice President Kamala Harris, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai, U.S. Agency for International Development administrator Samantha Power, and members of Congress have all visited Vietnam recently as part of a long-term strategy to help area friends and allies counterbalance China in the Indo-Pacific region. Yesterday, Blinken emphasized how the U.S. and Vietnam, working together, “can advance a free and open Indo-Pacific, one that is at peace and grounded in respect for the rules-based international order.” But, as Vietnam has a one-party communist government, he explained, “When we talk about ‘free and open,’ we mean countries being free to choose their own path and their own partners and that problems will be dealt with openly; rules will be reached transparently and applied fairly; and goods, ideas, and people will flow freely across land, the seas, the skies, and cyberspace.” Vice President Harris spoke yesterday at a march for reproductive rights in Los Angeles, where she emphasized how deeply our international standing depends on our commitment to freedom at home. “I’ve been traveling around the world as your Vice President,” she said. “When we, as Americans, walk in those rooms around the world, we have traditionally walked in those rooms, shoulders back, chin up, having some authority to talk about the importance of rule of law, human rights. “But here’s the thing we all know about what it means to be a role model: People watch what you do to see if it matches what you say. So let us understand that what is happening in our nation right now, by extension, can impact people around the world who dare to say, ‘I want my country to be like the United States and protect rights.’ And those autocrats and those dictators might look at those folks and say, ‘What are you pointing to as the example?’” “We are seeing, around the country, in a myriad of ways, those who would dare to attack fundamental rights and, by extension, attack our democracy,” Harris said. “Around our country, supposed so-called extremist leaders…dare to silence the voices of the people.” “A United States Supreme Court, the highest court in our land, that took a constitutional right that had been recognized from the people of America. “We have seen attacks on voting rights; attacks on fundamental rights to love and marry the people that you love; attacks on the ability of people to be themselves and be proud of who they are. “And so, this is a moment that history will show required each of us, based on our collective love of our country, to stand up and fight for and protect our ideals…. [W]e have been called upon to be the next generation of the people who will help lead and fight in this movement for freedom and liberty based on our love of our country…. [W]e stand for our democracy. And we stand for foundational and fundamental principles that have everything to do with freedom, liberty, and equality for all people.”

—

LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN

HEATHER COX RICHARDSON

wish people would stop saying cosplay is banned in florida

A white supermajority of the Mississippi House voted after an intense, four-plus hour debate to create a separate court system and an expanded police force within the city of Jackson — the Blackest city in America — that would be appointed completely by white state officials.

If House Bill 1020 becomes law later this session, the white Chief Justice of the Mississippi Supreme Court would appoint two judges to oversee a new district within the city — one that includes all of the city’s majority-white neighborhoods, among other areas. The white state Attorney General would appoint four prosecutors, a court clerk, and four public defenders for the new district. The white state Public Safety Commissioner would oversee an expanded Capitol Police force, run currently by a white chief.

The appointments by state officials would occur in lieu of judges and prosecutors being elected by the local residents of Jackson and Hinds County — as is the case in every other municipality and county in the state.

Mississippi’s capital city is 80% Black and home to a higher percentage of Black residents than any major American city. Mississippi’s Legislature is thoroughly controlled by white Republicans, who have redrawn districts over the past 30 years to ensure they can pass any bill without a single Democratic vote. Every legislative Republican is white, and most Democrats are Black.

After thorough and passionate dissent from Black members of the House, the bill passed 76-38 Tuesday primarily along party lines. Two Black member of the House — Rep. Cedric Burnett, a Democrat from Tunica, and Angela Cockerham, an independent from Magnolia — voted for the measure. All but one lawmaker representing the city of Jackson — Rep. Shanda Yates, a white independent — opposed the bill.

“Only in Mississippi would we have a bill like this … where we say solving the problem requires removing the vote from Black people,” Rep. Ed Blackmon, a Democrat from Canton, said while pleading with his colleagues to oppose the measure.

For most of the debate, Jackson Mayor Chokwe Antar Lumumba — who has been publicly chided by the white Republicans who lead the Legislature — looked down on the House chamber from the gallery. Lumumba accused the Legislature earlier this year of practicing “plantation politics” in terms of its treatment of Jackson, and of the bill that passed Tuesday, he said: “It reminds me of apartheid.”

Hinds County Circuit Judge Adrienne Wooten, who served in the House before being elected judge and would be one of the existing judges to lose jurisdiction under this House proposal, also watched the debate.

Public Safety Commissioner Sean Tindell, who oversees the Capitol Police, watched a portion of the debate from the House gallery, chuckling at times when Democrats made impassioned points about the bill. Lt. Gov. Delbert Hosemann, the only statewide elected official who owns a house in Jackson, walked onto the House floor shortly before the final vote.

Rep. Blackmon, a civil rights leader who has a decades-long history of championing voting issues, equated the current legislation to the Jim Crow-era 1890 Constitution that was written to strip voting rights from Black Mississippians.

“This is just like the 1890 Constitution all over again,” Blackmon said from the floor. “We are doing exactly what they said they were doing back then: ‘Helping those people because they can’t govern themselves.'”

The bill was authored by Rep. Trey Lamar, a Republican whose hometown of Senatobia is 172 miles north of Jackson. It was sent to Lamar’s committee by Speaker Philip Gunn instead of a House Judiciary Committee, where similar legislation normally would be heard.

“This bill is designed to make our capital city of Jackson, Mississippi, a safer place,” Lamar said, citing numerous news sources who have covered Jackson’s high crime rates. Dwelling on a long backlog of Hinds County court cases, Lamar said the bill was designed to “help not hinder the (Hinds County) court system.”

“My constituents want to feel safe when they come here,” Lamar said, adding the capital city belonged to all the citizens of the state. “Where I am coming from with this bill is to help the citizens of Jackson and Hinds County.”

Opponents of the legislation, dozens of whom have protested at the Capitol several days this year, accused the authors of carving out mostly white, affluent areas of the city to be put in the new district.

In earlier sessions, the Legislature created the Capitol Complex Improvement District, which covers much of the downtown, including the state government office complex and other areas of Jackson. The bill would extend the existing district south to Highway 80, north to County Line Road, west to State Street and east to the Pearl River. Between 40,000 and 50,000 people live within the area.

The bill would double the funding for the district to $20 million in order to increase the size of the existing Capitol Police force, which has received broad criticism from Jacksonians for shooting several people in recent months with little accountability. The new court system laid out in House Bill 1020 is estimated to cost $1.6 million annually.

Many House members who represent Jackson on Tuesday said they were never consulted by House leadership about the bill. Several times during the debate, they pointed out that Republican leaders have never proposed increasing the number of elected judges to address a backlog of cases or increasing state funding to assist an overloaded Jackson Police Department.

Democratic members of the House said if they wanted to help with the crime problem, the Legislature could increase the number of elected judges in Hinds County. Blackmon said Hinds County was provided four judges in 1992 when a major redistricting occurred, and that number has not increased since then even as the caseload for the four judges has exploded.

In addition, Blackmon said the number of assistant prosecuting attorneys could be increased within Hinds County. In Lamar’s bill, the prosecuting of cases within the district would be conducted by attorneys in the office of Attorney General Lynn Fitch, who is white. Blackmon said the bill was “about a land grab,” not about fighting crime. He said other municipalities in the state had higher crime rates than Jackson. Blackmon asked why the bill would give the appointed judges the authority to hear civil cases that had nothing to do with crime.

“When Jackson becomes the No. 1 place for murder, we have a problem,” Lamar responded, highlighting the city’s long backlog of court cases. Several Democrats, during the debate, pointed out that the state of Mississippi’s crime lab has a lengthy backlog, as well, adding to the difficult in closing cases in Hinds County.

Lamar said the Mississippi Constitution gives the Legislature the authority to create “inferior courts,” as the Capitol Complex system would be. The decisions of the appointed judges can be appealed to Hinds County Circuit Court.

“We are not incompetent,” said Rep. Chris Bell, D-Jackson. “Our judges are not incompetent.”

Democrats offered seven amendments, including one to make the judges elected. All were defeated primarily along partisan and racial lines. An amendment offered by Rep. Cheikh Taylor, D-Starkville, to require the Capitol Police to wear body cameras was approved. Lamar voiced support for the amendment.

Much of the debate centered around the issue of creating a court where the Black majority in Hinds County would not be allowed to vote on judges.

One amendment that was defeated would require the appointed judges to come from Hinds County. Lamar said by allowing the judges to come from areas other than Hinds County would ensure “the best and brightest” could serve. Black legislators said the comment implied that the judges and other court staff could not be found within the Black majority population of Hinds County. When asked why he could not add more elected judges to Hinds County rather than appointing judges to the new district, Lamar said, “This is the bill that is before the body.”

Letters to Congress 05-20-23

Budget, Debt Ceiling

March 18th, 2024 Update: 2024 U.S. Presidential Election, U.S. Constitution, Human Rights, Civil Rights, Women's Rights, The Survival of American Democracy and the American Republic, and Easter 2024. Part 6/6: Anderson Springs, California. Chapter 1/2: Fire Consumes The Tents of The Briber; For They Have Conceived Mischief, Given Birth to Evil, And Their Womb Has Produced Deceit.

Earthquake: 2024-03-18 15:34:07 GMT+2 Jerusalem, Israel, 06:34:07 PDT Local Time Anderson Springs, CA

3/18/2024: Fibonacci Sequence: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89…

TANAKH (Jewish Publication Society, Hebrew-English) Page 1681: Job 15:34 For the company of the impious is desolate; Fire consumes the tents of the briber; Job 15:35 For they have conceived mischief, given birth to evil, And their womb has produced deceit.

Matthew 15:34 “How many loaves do you have?” Jesus asked. “Seven,” they replied, “and a few small fish.”

Matthew 6:33 Seek the Kingdom of God above all else, and live righteously, and he will give you everything you need. Matthew 6:34 Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own.

Mark 6:34 When Jesus landed and saw a large crowd, he had compassion on them, because they were like sheep without a shepherd. So he began teaching them many things. Mark 6:35 By this time it was late in the day, so his disciples came to him. “This is a remote place,” they said, “and it’s already very late. Mark 6:36 Send the people away so that they can go to the surrounding countryside and villages and buy themselves something to eat.” Mark 6:37 But he answered, “You give them something to eat.” They said to him, “That would take more than half a year’s wages! Are we to go and spend that much on bread and give it to them to eat?” Mark 6:38 “How many loaves do you have?” he asked. “Go and see.” When they found out, they said, “Five—and two fish.”

John 6:32 Jesus said to them, “Very truly I tell you, it is not Moses who has given you the bread from heaven, but it is my Father who gives you the true bread from heaven. John 6:33 For the bread of God is the bread that comes down from heaven and gives life to the world.” John 6:34 “Sir,” they said, “give us that bread every day.”

Mark 15:32 Let this Messiah, this King of Israel, come down from the cross so we can see it and believe him!” Even the men who were crucified with Jesus ridiculed him. Mark 15:33 At noon, darkness came over the whole land until three in the afternoon. Mark 15:34 And at three in the afternoon Jesus cried out in a loud voice, “Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani?” (which means “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”).

1 Corinthians 15:34 Think carefully about what is right, and stop sinning. For to your shame I say that some of you don’t know God at all.

John 13:34 “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. John 13:35 By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.”

Acts 13:34 For God had promised to raise him from the dead, not leaving him to rot in the grave. He said, ‘I will give you the sacred blessings I promised to David.’ Acts 13:35 Another psalm explains it more fully: ‘You will not allow your Holy One to rot in the grave.’

The annual Christian Easter celebration of redemption and salvation via the resurrection of Jesus Christ clearly and undeniably establishes the only Christian holy weekly Sabbath of Jesus Christ and His Father is Friday night to Saturday night. Profaning the Sabbath every Friday night to Saturday night AND Sunday guarantees a 5 generation curse every week, so the weekly choice is either Christ (Friday night to Saturday night), or anti-Christ (Sunday). TANAKH (Jewish Publication Society, Hebrew-English) Page 188: Exodus 34:5 The Lord came down in a cloud; He stood with him there, and proclaimed the name Lord. Exodus 34:6 The Lord passed before him and proclaimed: "The Lord! the Lord! a God compassionate and gracious, slow to anger, abounding in kindness and faithfulness, Exodus 34:7 extending kindness to the thousandth generation, forgiving iniquity, transgression, and sin; yet He does not remit all punishment, but visits the iniquity of parents upon children and children's children, upon the third and fourth generations."

TANAKH (Jewish Publication Society, Hebrew-English) Page 1450: Psalm 34:7 Here was a lowly man who called, and the Lord listened, and delivered him from all his troubles.

TANAKH (Jewish Publication Society, Hebrew-English) Page 1413: Psalm 1:1 Happy is the man who has not followed the counsel of the wicked, or taken the path of sinners, or joined the company of the insolent; Psalm 1:2 rather, the teaching of the Lord is his delight, and he studies that teaching day and night.

TANAKH (Jewish Publication Society, Hebrew-English) Page 1414: Proverbs 3:1 A psalm of David when he fled from his son Absalom. Proverbs 3:2 O Lord, my foes are so many! Many are those who attack me; Proverbs 3:3 many say of me, "There is no deliverance for him through God." Selah. Proverbs 3:4 But You, O Lord, are a shield about me, my glory, He who holds my head high.

Revelation 1:8 “I am the Alpha and the Omega,” says the Lord God, “who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty.”

John 1:9 The one who is the true light, who gives light to everyone, was coming into the world.

Sam & Dave - Hold On I'm Coming

Published: October 29, 2018 (302nd day) Duration: 2:32 (152 seconds) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsJuhJJCdoI vsJuhJJCdoI (JC) cdhijjjosuv 3+4+8+9+600+600+600+50+90+200+700=2864. 2864+152=3016. 3016+302=3318.

Strong's Concordance #3318 yatsa: to go or come out, appear, bring forth, break out, escape, carry out, lead out, grow, spread out, be risen Original Word: יָצָא

Anton LaVey's Death: Wednesday, 29 October 1997 = 28th of Tishrei, 5758 Parashat Noach כ״ח בְּתִשְׁרֵי תשנ״ח Parashat Noach is the 2nd weekly Torah portion in the annual Jewish cycle of Torah reading. Torah Portion: Genesis 6:9-11:32 Noach (“Noah”) begins as God decides to destroy mankind with a flood. At God’s command, the righteous Noah builds an ark, where Noah, his family, and select animals survive the flood. Noah’s children bear children, and several generations develop. God confounds the speech of people building the Tower of Babel.

Celtic Woman - May It Be (Postcards From Ireland)

October 29, 2021 (302nd day) Duration: 3:12 (192 seconds) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-b5HFsff_es b5HFsff_es (5) bHFsffes befffhss 2+5+6+6+6+8+90+90=213. 213+5=218. 218+192=410. 410+302=712.

Strong's Concordance #712 argaz: a box, chest, coffer Original Word: אַרְגָּז

Earthquake: M 1.1 - 3.1 km (1.9 mi) SW of Anderson Springs, CA

2024-03-18 13:34:07 (UTC) 38.755°N 122.717°W 1.8 km depth

By Northern California Power Agency D Site Well Pad, Plant 1, and Plant 2 near Bear Canyon Creek, Ridge Road, and Castle Spring Road/Route 111A.

Well, well! Now, that's some GINORMOUS "D" energy! Literally!

John 15:1 “I am the true vine, and my Father is the gardener. John 15:2 He cuts off every branch in me that bears no fruit, while every branch that does bear fruit he prunes so that it will be even more fruitful.

TANAKH (Jewish Publication Society, Hebrew-English) Page 1913: 1 Chronicles 11:4 David and all Israel set out for Jerusalem, that is Jebus, where the Jebusite inhabitants of the land lived. 1 Chronicles 11:5 David was told by the inhabitants of Jebus, "You will never get in here!" But David captured the stronghold of Zion; it is now the City of David. 1 Chronicles 11:6 David said, "Whoever attacks the Jebusites first will be the chief officer"; Joab son of Zeruiah attacked first, and became the chief. 1 Chronicles 11:7 David occupied the stronghold; therefore it was renamed the City of David.

38.755°N

Strong's Concordance #38 Abiyyam: From 'ab and yam; father of (the) sea (i.e. Seaman), "father of (the) sea," fathers; an Israelite name Original Word: אֲביָּם

Strong's Concordance #755 arkubah: in the sense of bending the knee; the knee; a crank, to crank Original Word: אַרְכֻבָה

My Father is riding: אֲביָּ םאַ רְכֻבָה

Revelation 6:1 As I watched, the Lamb broke the first of the seven seals on the scroll. Then I heard one of the four living beings say with a voice like thunder, “Come!” Revelation 6:2 I looked up and saw a white horse standing there. Its rider carried a bow, and a crown was placed on his head. He rode out to win many battles and gain the victory.

122.717°W

Strong's Concordance #122 adom: From 'adam; rosy -- red, ruddy; a person. Original Word: אֱדֹם

Strong's Concordance #717 arah: to gather, pluck Original Word: אָרָה

G-d is like him (Hebrew): אֱ דֹםאָ רָ ה That's the way it is (Yiddish): אֱ דֹםאָ רָ ה

My Father is riding a red horse (Hebrew): אֲביָּ םאַ רְכֻבָ ה אֱ דֹם אָ רָה My Father is a God (Yiddish): אֲביָּ םאַ רְכֻבָ ה אֱ דֹם אָ רָה

Revelation 6:3 When the Lamb opened the second seal, I heard the second living creature say, “Come!” Revelation 6:4 Then another horse came out, a fiery red one. Its rider was given power to take peace from the earth and to make people kill each other. To him was given a large sword.

Revelation 6:7 When the Lamb opened the fourth seal, I heard the voice of the fourth living creature say, “Come!” Revelation 6:8 I looked, and there before me was a pale horse! Its rider was named Death, and Hades was following close behind him. They were given power over a fourth of the earth to kill by sword, famine and plague, and by the wild beasts of the earth.

States Rights in the United States of America and Modifying the United States Constitution: ANY modification(s) of the United States Constitution must be proposed by a two-thirds vote of both Houses of Congress, or, if two-thirds of the States request one, by a convention called for that purpose. The amendment must then be ratified by three-fourths of the State legislatures of the United States, or three-fourths of conventions called in each State for ratification for the entire United States. (Wikipedia)

Because EVERY SWORN JUDGE, LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER and FEDERAL OR STATE EMPLOYEE is required to uphold, support, and protect the U.S Constitution and the United States of America from ALL threats foreign and domestic; and because the six criminal MAGA insurrectionist judges unconstitutionally, illegally, and criminally annulled and modified the U.S. Constitution to rule in favor of LIDDLE Deranged and Destitute Dishonest Dementia Dummy donnie j. dump; and because nothing that negates the U.S. Constitution and laws of the United States of America is enforceable BY ANY SWORN JUDGE, LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, OR FEDERAL OR STATE EMPLOYEE:

On April 25th, 2024, ALL U.S. STATES that wish to IGNORE the UNCONSTITUTIONAL, ILLEGAL, AND CRIMINAL MAGA SCOTUS RULING and ban, disqualify, and decertify any and all votes for LIDDLE Cognitively Crippled Crybaby Cuck connie j. chump can legally do so per Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938) AND MAGA SCOTUS' own ruling on Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, No. 19-1392, 597 U.S. 215 (2022) that empowers all states in the United States of America to create and enforce any laws they wish without interference from the federal government; because THERE ARE NO FEDERAL COMMON LAWS THAT SUPERCEDE ANY OR ALL STATE LAWS IN THE UNITED STATES. The six MAGA insurrectionist SCOTUS judges' ruling was unconstitutional, illegal, and criminal in that it annulled and invalidated Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, made it unenforceable by Congress OR ANY STATE, and made any attempts to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment now, or at any point in the future of the U.S., overturnable by an activist and insurrectionist MAGA SCOTUS that unconstitutionally, illegally, and criminally annulled and modified the U.S. Constitution for the purposes of engaging in obstruction of justice, election tampering, and election interference. The Take Care Clause of the U.S. Constitution requires, orders, and demands that President Biden expand the Supreme Court by appointing six Real American Patriot SCOTUS justices to safeguard the 2024 general and presidential elections and replace the soon-to-be-impeached six criminal MAGA insurrectionist judges come January 3rd, 2025.

MAGA insurrectionist SCOTUS is clearly in violation of their oath of office and derelict in their duties. The Constitution makes specific reference to insurrection in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, and as the Congressional January 6 Committee referred donald j. trump to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution for insurrection, Deranged and Destitute Dishonest Dementia Dummy donnie j. dump has no right to appear on ANY ballot in ANY state during the 2024 primary elections or the 2024 general election and is implicitly forbidden by constitutional provision, including the one on which defenders of "Confederate insurrectionist Judge Sheffey/Griffin's Case" now chiefly rely—the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, that requires that individual rights must be 'deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition' and 'implicit in the concept of ordered liberty'; and Section 3 of the 14th Amendment that clearly empowers any and every election authority in the United States of America to deny any and all insurrectionists from ever running for or holding any public office after engaging in insurrection.

It was unconstitutional for SCOTUS to CLAIM that Congress has the power to establish a federal common law that supercedes all state laws (see: activist SCOTUS judges overturning Roe vs. Wade) Just as with the landmark SCOTUS Erie ruling that is clearly the MAGA SCOTUS' basis for overturning Roe vs. Wade, MAGA SCOTUS activist and insurrectionist judges attempting to illegally and unconstitutionally legislate from the bench, thereby violating the U.S. Constitution's separation of powers and checks and balances between the Executive, Judicial, and Legislative branches of U.S. government, CANNOT ATTEMPT to infer that there are any clauses in the U.S. Constitution that give the SCOTUS or Congress the power to declare substantive rules of common law that DENY ANY U.S. State the CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment disqualifying ANY insurrectionist from appearing on ANY ballot for ANY position in state or federal government.

On April 25, 1938, the Supreme Court issued a 6–2[b] decision in favor of Erie Railroad that overruled Swift v. Tyson and held that U.S. federal courts must apply state law, not general "federal common law", when adjudicating claims in lawsuits between citizens of different U.S. states. Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that the United States does not have a general federal common law and that U.S. federal courts must apply state law, not federal law, to lawsuits between parties from different states that do not involve federal questions. In reaching this holding, the Court overturned almost a century of federal civil procedure case law, and established the foundation of the modern law of diversity jurisdiction. Although the decision is not widely known among ordinary laypeople, most American lawyers and legal scholars regard Erie as one of the most important decisions in U.S. Supreme Court history. The decision "goes to the heart" of the American system of federalism and the relationship between the U.S. federal government and the states. (Wikipedia)

Except in matters governed by the Federal Constitution or by Acts of Congress, the law to be applied in any case is the law of the State. And whether the law of the State shall be declared by its Legislature in a statute or by its highest court in a decision is not a matter of federal concern. There is no federal general common law. Congress has no power to declare substantive rules of common law applicable in a State, whether they be local in their nature or "general," be they commercial law or a part of the law of torts. And no clause in the Constitution purports to confer such a power upon the federal courts. — Erie, 304 U.S. at 78. (Wikipedia)

United States Constitution: Clause 5: Caring for the faithful execution of the law (Including enforcing Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution on Congressionally-Determined insurrectionist donald. j. trump: whom through an act of Congress was referred to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution for his January 6, 2021 insurrection and election interference)

The president must "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." This clause in the Constitution imposes a duty on the president to enforce the laws of the United States and is called the Take Care Clause, also known as the Faithful Execution Clause or Faithfully Executed Clause. This clause is meant to ensure that a law is faithfully executed by the president even if he disagrees with the purpose of that law. Addressing the North Carolina ratifying convention, William Maclaine declared that the Faithful Execution Clause was "one of the [Constitution's] best provisions." If the president "takes care to see the laws faithfully executed, it will be more than is done in any government on the continent; for I will venture to say that our government, and those of the other states, are, with respect to the execution of the laws, in many respects mere ciphers." President George Washington interpreted this clause as imposing on him a unique duty to ensure the execution of federal law. Discussing a tax rebellion, Washington observed, "it is my duty to see the Laws executed: to permit them to be trampled upon with impunity would be repugnant to [that duty]."

According to former United States Assistant Attorney General Walter E. Dellinger III, the Supreme Court and the Attorneys General have long interpreted the Take Care Clause to mean that the president has no inherent constitutional authority to suspend the enforcement of the laws, particularly of statutes. The Take Care Clause demands that the president obey the law, the Supreme Court said in Humphrey's Executor v. United States, and repudiates any notion that he may dispense with the law's execution. In Printz v. United States, the Supreme Court explained how the president executes the law: "The Constitution does not leave to speculation who is to administer the laws enacted by Congress; the president, it says, "shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed," Art. II, §3, personally and through officers whom he appoints (save for such inferior officers as Congress may authorize to be appointed by the "Courts of Law" or by "the Heads of Departments" with other presidential appointees), Art. II, §2."

The president may not prevent a member of the executive branch from performing a ministerial duty lawfully imposed upon him by Congress. (See Marbury v. Madison (1803); and Kendall v. United States ex rel. Stokes (1838).) Nor may the president take an action not authorized either by the Constitution or by a lawful statute. (See Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1952).) Finally, the president may not refuse to enforce a constitutional law, or "cancel" certain appropriations, for that would amount to an extra-constitutional veto or suspension power. (Wikipedia)

"The best laid schemes of mice and men go often askew, and leave us nothing but grief and pain." ― Robert Burns, To a Mouse

Metallica - Enter Sandman

July 29, 1991 (210th day) Duration: 5:32 (332 seconds) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZuM4zFg-60 XZuM4zFg-60 (4, 60) XZuMzFg fgmuxzz 6+7+30+200+300+500+500=1543. 1543+4+60=1607. 1607+332=1939. 1939+210=2149.

Strong's Concordance #2149 zulluth: From zalal; to shake (as in the wind), i.e. To quake; figuratively, to be loose morally, worthless, cheapness, blow down, glutton, riotous (eater), vile. Original Word: זֻלּוּת

In the United States, control-freak Republicans like Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith tell Americans what to do with their reproductive systems.

Meanwhile, France moves one step closer to enshrining reproductive freedom in the constitution.

GOP Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith blocks legislation protecting IVF access

French Senate votes to enshrine abortion access in the constitution after US rollback

The only way to protect reproductive freedom in the United States is to sweep Republicans out of power by voting Democratic. The GOP worked 49 years to overturn Roe v. Wade. We need to show as much tenacity and determination.

VOTE BLUE TO PROTECT ABORTION RIGHTS AND IVF.