Tumgik
#diana rants
diana-rose-25 · 5 months
Text
!PLEASE READ AND INTERACT!
It has come to my attention that a Tumblr Account by the name of @/badas-truth has been bullying and harassing @nimxie.
Honestly, just the thought of having to mention a bully of one of my favorite writers in my account is giving me the ick. They don't deserve to be tagged in any of my posts. However, this is an urgent and serious matter.
To my dear followers, I urge you to go to this account and report them. Do not interact with them or their posts, just block and report them. It will only give them more attention they don't deserve.
@nimxie is one of the best authors in this app. She is one of the reasons why I started to write, and one of the people who inspires me. You have no idea how delighted and over the moon I was when I saw her on my notifications just because she liked my story. It was one of the most amazing experiences I ever had this year.
You're an amazing writer @nimxie, I'm so sorry this happened to you. You don't deserve any of this, but I hope you know what an incredible writer you are and an inspiration to many.
And to @/badas-truth, if you ever read this — and I hope you do, if you have nothing nice to say, then don't say anything at all. Anyone with basic decency and education would have known that already, and if you dont, then that just says a lot about you. What you did and are currently doing to one of the writers in this app is just vile, cruel, and disgusting.
I saw your recent post, by the way, and it was down right pathetic, sad, and something someone insanely insecure would do. But, you know what, I also feel incredibly sad and sorry for you. Get some help, read a book, take a walk, and maybe do something productive in your life other than projecting your insecurities and loneliness to someone else.
You want to be @nimxie and her attention so bad it makes you look pathetically depressing and desperate.
I'm not a licensed nurse or doctor, but I think you have a disease called jealously and insecurity real bad.
Get well soon though. 🫰😊
37 notes · View notes
aheavenlylake · 15 days
Text
i'm literally so fucking depressed that I can't even function today
yesterday I was happy and hopeful, and today feels like hell
my meds are coming in 2 days, my meds are coming in 2 days, in 2 days everything will be fine and better and I'll be okay again
2 notes · View notes
imarvelatthestars · 1 month
Text
my computer problems have at last been (temporarily) solved! hoping to get back on that fanfic grind asap 💪
2 notes · View notes
diana-rose25 · 6 months
Text
Yoo, when I tell you my FUCKING heart almost dropped to my ass when I thought I didn't save the Teaser for Let's Dance??? (⁠╯⁠°⁠□⁠°⁠)⁠╯⁠︵⁠ ⁠┻⁠━⁠┻
I was about to enter my mental breakdown in the middle of Midterms frfr. ಥ⁠‿⁠ಥ
3 notes · View notes
martiniluvr · 15 days
Text
zack snyder looked at this man
Tumblr media Tumblr media
and said “what if we made him so miserable and tortured and angry” and everyone at dc just agreed.
sleep with one eye open mr snyder. I’m coming for you. for all your crimes.
286 notes · View notes
fantastic-nonsense · 4 months
Note
I wouldn't mind the heavy focus on warrior Amazons so much if they were allowed to be competent instead of just being used as red shirt cannon fodder. But it seems DC only hypes up the Amazons as deadly fighters so other characters can look more impressive when they take them down.
Oh and Happy New Year.
Happy New Year! Forgive me if I use your ask to talk about a piece of the Wonder Woman mythos I've wanted to discuss for some time, because your complaints offered me the perfect segue to write a nice, in-depth meta on it and I couldn't pass up the opportunity.
Honestly, I think a lot of people (both creatives and readers) either don't know, forget, or fundamentally misunderstand the nature of the Amazons' warrior status. So they often get reduced to "deadly warriors who strike first," "supposedly deadly but generally incompetent warriors when outside of their own books," or "militant man-haters" by a lot of people. None of which are true.
The Amazons are incredibly competent warriors and have been since Marston's first portrayal of them in the 1940s, so I don't inherently mind them being shown as such. However, where people get bogged down is insisting that they be shown as deadly and trigger-happy offensive fighters who are happy to strike first and hard, which fundamentally goes against the philosophy and thematic messaging built into Amazonian lore.
DC's Amazonia, lore-wise, is traditionally framed as an Aphrodite vs. Ares "peace and love vs. violence and war" story. In Marston's original rendition of the Amazon's backstory Aphrodite is not only their patron goddess but also their sole creator; it was only after Crisis on Infinite Earths and George Perez's long-overdue lore expansions that the rest of the goddesses became co-creators and co-patrons of the Amazons. Regardless, Ares and his domain are consistently invoked as what the Amazons don't want to be like or engage in. That behavior is the antithesis of what Amazons are supposed to be. This lore informs literally everything about how the Amazons view both their combat abilities and their duty to the goddesses.
The contemporary Amazons are, for the most part, women who died in terrible and traumatic ways at the hands of men (usually through domestic violence, murder, or as conquests of war). When the goddesses created the Amazons by reincarnating these women via the Well of Souls, they specifically charged them to become their champions. And what did these goddesses want? They explicitly wanted justice and protection for women in a violently patriarchial world. The Amazons being warriors is thus specifically tied to an understanding of necessary self-defense and protection (both of themselves and other women), not offense.
Which of course is what lands the Amazons on Themyscira in the first place: invoking the goddesses' ire by not obeying these commands after their rebellion against their enslavement by Heracles and his men crosses the line from the necessary battle to achieve their liberation into wanton violence and revenge:
Tumblr media
"The battered Hippolyta prayed to her goddesses and found the courage and inspiration to free herself. Athena had reminded Hippolyta of the Amazons' purpose and mission—but not all of the Amazons remembered. Or cared. They yearned for vengeance. For retribution against those who violated them...and under Antiope, many found it." -Wonder Woman: Our Worlds at War (2001)
And as Hippolyta and Menalippe tell Antiope:
Tumblr media
"No, Antiope. Never vengeance; never again!" /// "That is Ares' way, Antiope. We achieve no glory by embracing the Dark God's power!" -Wonder Woman (1987) #1
The Amazon way is promoting a society based on love, equality, truth, and peaceful conflict resolution, not vengeance and violent combat. It's a philosophy that defines Diana's mission in Man's World as an ambassador, teacher, and living example of her peoples' way of life:
Tumblr media
Enraptured, they listen to her dissertation on equality between the sexes, tolerance, peaceful coexistence. Social Philosophy 101, Amazon Style. -Wonder Woman (1987) #170
Tumblr media
Diana's gods-given mission was to spread the Amazonian ideals of conciliation—to give those living in the World of Man the proper tools to peacefully coexist with each other. It was her life's purpose to teach the possibilities of respect and love by being a living example of an upbringing founded in those ideals.
Truth-seeking, diplomacy, and peace are the Amazonian way of dealing with conflict, not violence. And when you are forced to engage in combat (and you should be prepared for that eventuality because sometimes it will happen), your goal should be self-defense and de-escalation, not offense and prolonging the conflict longer than necessary.
This is also, as an aside, why Diana (and specifically Diana in her capacity as Wonder Woman) does not usually carry offensive weapons like a sword and why her primary "weapons" are the Lasso of Truth and protective bracelets. She's the official representative of her peoples' culture and personally deeply believes in that cultural philosophy. Other Amazons have different views on the matter, including her mother, but Diana grew up completely separated from the World of Man and fully immersed in that belief system, which deeply informs how she views her mission as Wonder Woman.
Personally, I think many (but not all) of the problems re: depicting the Amazons in the modern era come from various writers attempting to solve contradictions that don't exist. They see "kickass trained warriors living peacefully on an island" and see that as a contradiction they have to solve: why do they train if they're pacifists? Why do they fight if they're peaceful? In reality, it's not a contradiction: their status as warriors and champions is specifically tied to self-defense and protection (both of themselves and others), but given the choice they don't want to have to take up arms to protect people because that goes against their fundamental cultural philosophy. Outsiders and meddlesome gods are the ones who force them to do that! What they want is for everyone to be treated with love, respect, and understanding so they don't have to!
And there's a lot of problematic elements built into the concept's execution, but this is the core thesis behind the split between Hippolyta's Themyscirans and Antiope's Bana-Mighdall. The Themysciran Amazons have had their fill of violence and war; they just want to live in peace. But a) they were specifically tasked with guarding Doom's Doorway when they were taken to the island, a duty which necessitates perfect combat readiness, and b) their history is littered with examples of people refusing to leave them alone. So they train, in case someone decides to take shots at them, but otherwise live in peaceful isolation. Meanwhile, the Banas looked at that same shared history and went "we need to take the fight to the outside world. Offense is the best defense, and the only way to protect ourselves and the other women of the world is to actively seek vengeance for the violence women face." So they chose to actively intervene in Man's World, fighting constant battles and exacting revenge for any women mistreated at the hands of men.
...which is also why Artemis was such a necessary and interesting addition to the Wonder Woman mythos (even if she's often handled...poorly), because she and Diana represent two diametrically opposed views of how to protect and represent both their cultures and the women of Man's World, but that's a rant for a different time.
Anyway, the Themysciran Amazons' martial pacifism as a cultural value isn't a contradiction; it's one way of looking at a history filled with violence and victimization and saying "no more." And it's a pretty subversive way of doing so, which (well-written) comics tend to note!
So yes, the "Amazons are warriors" mentality has always been there and has been solidly emphasized at various points throughout Wonder Woman's history, and it should be acknowledged and shown that they're all incredibly competent in battle when they're forced to engage in it. But the way in which it gets emphasized is what defines whether a writer has a solid understanding of the history and baggage that comes with depicting the Amazonian struggle and the socio-political issues embedded in their lore. And unfortunately...many writers just don't seem to get it.
280 notes · View notes
bluespiritshonour · 4 months
Text
Why is it always Robin has to prove himself to Batman? Be it any Robin. And no, I'm not talking about characters, because Bruce—Bruce is like “Everyone must prove themselves to me but I'm not answerable to anyone” that motherfucker. Very IC.
I'm talking about stories, about narratives—why does every Robin-centric narrative has a “prove themselves to Batman” arc—but Bruce's arc never involves proving himself to anyone?
Why, after the events of the Tower of Babel, Bruce didn't have to work to gain the Justice League's approval? Why didn't he have to work to redeem himself, dammit!
Yes. He had to reveal his identity. But then, it wasn't his idea. It was Clark's. It's fundamentally different from Dick unmasking in front of the Titans: Dick feels in his bones that it isn't fair that he's the only one masked and the Titans are up for mutiny, so he made an executive decision.
It didn't even occur to Bruce to do it. Dammit, the fucker wasn't even trying to get back into Justice League. Clark had to persuade him. And no, I don't mean he should have gone and begged them to let him in. He doesn't need them.
But let's be honest: none of the Leaguers need the League. But humanity does. That's why they put their differences aside and band together.
Bruce is selfless when it comes to sacrificing his family a la Batman : Ego. Oh!—it's Bruce's children that are dying in Batman's mission. Isn't he so noble?—the picture of tragedy? The greiving father? The man who can't even have a steady romantic relationship because Batman wouldn't let him? So selfless—until he isn't. Until the JL—in other words, a planet full of people—need him to swallow his pride. Then, he isn't selfless anymore.
He's selfless when he's a father sending his children to war for the greater good—but he's not selfless when it's time to swallow his pride, to take the risk of trusting someone even after being traumatised and betrayed—for the greater good. (And honestly his trust issues seem narcissistic when surrounded by people like Dick, Alfred and freaking Commissioner Gordon!)
You know who does it? Dick Grayson. That's who. The “trust no one” maxim has been drilled into him by Bruce, but even then he chooses to trust. Not because he's stupid, but because it's a requirement. He totally expects to be stabbed in the back; he isn't naïve. But he'd rather be betrayed than have someone be barred from help because they seemed suspicious. It's canon in Titans. He says it in words, look it up. To Brother Blood, I guess.
Bruce didn't have to work to get on the League's good side. He just had to reveal his ID to regain trust and that, too, was Clark's idea.
And that's not an attempt at redemption, because if it was, then why did Clark have to do it too? Clark didn't do anything to deserve it. But Bruce forces him to and Clark agrees: for the greater good that the League trusting each other would ensure.
Clark Kent, who chooses to forego a mask so that people trust him. Literally, it comes down to that. Who has to built his whole civilian life around the fact that he shows his bare fucking face to the whole world.
And honestly, if I were to throw genre convention aside and read the text the hard way, Bruce doesn't seem really all that bothered with keeping his ID a secret. He's nothing compared to Clark. I mean. Come on, look at the number of people who know Bruce's ID and the number that know Clark's and tell me. Fucking tell me who's more serious about that stuff.
Bruce's entire existence hinges on other characters’ kindness, in and out of universe. In-universe there's this massive brigade of people who know his ID and keep it a secret. Out of universe, writers who show him to be the best even though Clark, Diana, Dick are all more worthy than him.
This is what you get when you let little incels run creative industries.
What did Bruce ever have to do to redeem himself to anyone? Literally anyone? Bruce would let Gotham burn if it meant he keeps his colossal pride intact. But oh, send his children to die: woe is him, this greiving father, so tragique—would absolutely do that.
He isn't even a hero. You know the impact of Batman: Ego and BtAS pales when put next to his very selfish acts when it comes to himself.
Because always—ALWAYS—the uwu factor in Bruce's stories aren't personal.
Not like it's in Clark's who has to face xenophobia because he's an alien. He's natural existence—his powers that are a part of him existing—being called a threat. He still helps.
Not like Diana who comes to the Man's World and decides to stay behind despite it being, well, a Man's World. That would never really respect her as much as it respects a man, any man, even though she's a literal Goddess. Coming and staying in Man's World for her means loneliness. Being immortal and watching every friend she ever made become a memory. But she chose to do it. Because at the end of the day, it's not about her. It's about helping people.
But for Bruce, in true male-is-default fashion, it's about losing people. People he loves.
His parents' death, Jason's death and so on and so forth. I'm not saying losing someone is not painful. I'm just saying it's always about his manpain.
Making the victim's pain his.
220 notes · View notes
ghostboyhood · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
urghhh
adam daughter au i love you.. the idea came from @latenightsundayblues and i cant stop thinking about it..
close ups below
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
i feel like her name would be elizabeth since theres so many nicknames, eli, liz, lizzy, eliza, and some are gender neutral.. idk it just fits to me, do you see it.. and i feel like it matches with adam yk?
adam tries his best with her, i feel like he'd treat her like a friend obviously w exception but yeah
79 notes · View notes
britneyshakespeare · 5 months
Text
wait james somerton sounds a lot like some people on tumblr when they start spouting off about queer history or supposed controversies within it. is that where you guys are getting your stuff? is it james somerton brain poisoning?
89 notes · View notes
fr33sh00tr · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
that "are we friends in every universe" thing from tiktok but with all the complicated forms my platonic love manifests for people that i dont have a name for
47 notes · View notes
sugarlesswriting · 4 months
Text
I have a love/hate relationship with early 2000's DC comics. Things I loved about it was that it felt like everyone was more connected than they are now. There were good stories like Blackest Night. Even with Identity Crisis, I liked seeing how hero's who were on different teams worked together to get their end goal. (Still didn't like the character assassination though. RIP Sue you died because Dan wanted something dark 🤪). So many things I didn't like about it would be Countdown to Infinite Crisis. Character assassinate Maxwell Lord while making him kill Ted Cord. Also Ted Cord dying.
Even if I loved Generations Lost and how Booster Gold took the mantle of team leader, I just had ignore my feelings towards making Maxwell someone like that. Martian Manhunter looked into the heart and mind of Max and said that there was good in there and that he was a member of the Justice League.
This was where I also started to have my disinterest with Batman as a character. No one understood the story of Tower of Babel. It was to show how wrong Bruce was when he made the plans to take down the members of the Justice League. Instead writers were like, No, actually he was right because of mind wiping. That's why I also never like it when batman fans say that it makes sense. Story point no it doesn't. The story's end goal was to say that he was wrong for being paranoid and not trusting his team. The story's end with him being right to do that is not it.
The ripple effects of Identity Crisis was a good idea and I do acknowledge that it was one of the reasons why everyone felt connected. But it made Batmans character sour for me.
When Maxwell Lord was puppetering Superman into trying to kill Dianna and then he would most likely go for Batman. When he was stopped by Diana, Max told her that he would just continue to do it and that the only thing that could stop him was death. Diana was the only one to understand that. She said bet and snapped his neck.
I hated how both Superman and Batman gave her so much shit for it. Batman had the balls to tell her she had changed. Okay Mister-1984-the-Entire-Meta-Humans. You truly are the best person to speak on this matter. 🙄
Also I found that really funny coming from Batman, the man who told Martian Manhunter to fuck with the minds of white martians and brainwash them into thinking that they were humans. Batman slowly became the biggest hypocrite on the team in the aughts and onward. But since he's Batman writers don't have anyone call him out on his shit. And even when they do it's still skewed to make it seem like Batman is still right somehow.
22 notes · View notes
diana-rose-25 · 4 months
Text
I LOVE triangles.
The drama, the frustrations, the miscommunication, the will-they-won't-they, the longing, the "wishing it was me", you know. The Trope.
I love reading about it and knowing who the end game is and feeling bad for the second lead.
I. LOVE. IT.
But I don't like it when it's happening to me irl...
haha someone stab me from the sides than choose please....
10 notes · View notes
thecosmosproject · 6 months
Note
What are your fav little witch academia charecters and why?
My answer is pretty basic but my all time favorites has to be Diana
Diana is my favorite because of the character development she had throughout the series, more notably, the created depth of her character portrayed in the TV series instead of her OVA and movie portrayal.
In the movie and OVA, she was your typical bratty honors student. She was held to a high standard, giving her arrogance to harass Akko for her childish ways.
Tumblr media
However, in the TV series, instead of being that arrogant honor student shown in the ova and movie, she's a level-headed noble who more or less scolds Akko for her childish ways instead of harassing her for it. In the beginning, she's the "antagonist" to the viewer because we're following Akko's view throughout the series.
But as the series continues, we are shown the other side of Diana.
She puts up a front of being confident and logical because she grew up in a environment that placed her on a pedestal for being a descendent of one of the nine olde witches: Beatrix Cavendish. Preventing her from enjoying her childhood as both her parents died when she was young.
In addition, she was left in the care of her aunt who dislikes her for her dedication to preserving their family's ways.
She was willing to give up studying in Luna Nova to become head of the Cavendish Estate so she could preserve the few things left of her mother and ancestors.
Anyways that's enough ranting from me! Sorry!
Tumblr media
31 notes · View notes
imarvelatthestars · 3 months
Text
i present to you all - my updated sw bookcase (not featuring dark disciple bc I keep pretending I'm gonna be able to read it in between homework assignments)
Tumblr media
AND THE TAI BOOK
Tumblr media Tumblr media
F I N A L L Y REAL TAI MERCH SDHSDGKASKGDA
4 notes · View notes
diana-rose25 · 6 months
Text
I moved everyone! @diana-rose-25
1 note · View note
ultramarine-spirit · 1 year
Text
Why Athy's coronation is a bigger deal than it seems
Or me overthinking WMMAP's worldbuilding
The narrative of Athy's coronation is so interesting to me. Perhaps it wasn't completely intended by Spoon, but its implications for the world of WMMAP are more than impressive.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
What got me thinking about this is that, in real life, the heir to the throne is not "crowned" as crown prince, they are the person expected to succeed since birth. That would be Athy as Claude's only child, so why would she need a coronation? Apart from securing the position that people have been trying to steal from her since she was born. Well, if we look at how royal succession works in real life, until the 20th century crown princesses weren't considered heirs. Being the rulers of their nation by their own right was just not allowed.
They were more often than not the spouse of a crown prince, but even crown princesses by birth wouldn't inherit the throne in a male dominated succession. Which seems to be exactly Obelia's case, despite how its first ruler was a queen, Queen Ambrose, as stated in the novel by Athy. Some interesting events must have happened between Obelia's foundation and the present day for that to change.
Tumblr media
We see some subtle signs of this in the manhwa. All the royal portraits only depict male rulers, and Athy mentions how immortal names were only granted by the emperor to his heir, the empress' son, that's why Claude received such a name (meaning "limping"). We aren't told that giving immortal names to the emperor's daughter was outright forbidden, but it's certainly unusual, as -apart from Ambrose- Athy is the only member of Obelia's royal family that we know has a name evocative of immortality. The named emperors, Anastasius, Aevum, Aeternitas, Caelum, were all males.
This makes Diana naming her daughter "Athanasia" incredibly daring. She wasn't the emperor, who has the right to choose an heir, she wasn't even Claude's wife, and yet Diana was the one who gave Athy her name.
Tumblr media
So, following Obelia's succession and history, it looks like Athy was never expected to actually rule the empire or exert authority. Sure, she would be the empress, but she wouldn't be looked as an equal to her male predecessors. In the novel, both local and foreign nobles were very invested in who Athy was going to marry, saying that she needed to have a strong and capable husband, like Arlanta's prince Dice, since as a princess she was delicate and weak. Others (Roger) argued that she must marry an obelian nobleman, to maintain the power within the country. This was followed by a hilarious scene of Athy breaking the cutlery and shutting their mouths.
This kind of worldbuilding also explains why Roger was so focused on Ijekiel marrying Jennette, he wanted him or their future son to be emperor. As we see in the novel's LP side story, they never wanted Jennette to seize the throne, and she never got a coronation or the title of heir. The same could be said for the manhwa, Anastasius and Aeternitas wanted to use her as a puppet, not make her an empress, and in that way legitimize their accession to the throne.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Athy actually being considered the heir to the throne by her own merits and later crowned as such is pretty extraordinary for a world like Obelia's. Other series have coronation ceremonies for princes and princesses, so maybe Spoon thought it was a real thing, but both analyzed from a real life point of view and from within the narrative, it's an amazing achievement. Claude is obviously not someone that cares for Obelia's traditions, the nobles rescenting him for his origins, so it's even possible that the ceremony was the first of its kind.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Since Athy is Claude's only child, the reader would expect her to be the next ruler by default, but Obelia doesn't seem like a particularly equal society when it comes to both class and gender. This is even more apparent with the misogynistic treatment she received in the novel, or how a noble tried to belittle her in the manhwa. Even more polite nobles mentioned they thought of Athy as little more than "a cute little princess" before she became the emperor's proxy. So it was natural that, with Anastasius suddenly coming back to life, a good portion of the traditional noble faction would back him, despite being an overthrown tyrant.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
In summary, Athy being crowned as heir is an extraordinary accomplishment in itself, breaking Obelia's tradition of perhaps centuries. I would dare to say, maybe an unprecedented event since Queen Ambrose's rule. And as the final chapter states, she would become an empress adored by the people and who would live on in history.
183 notes · View notes