Tumgik
#ring camera
callese · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
S.686 - RESTRICT Act
33K notes · View notes
daygloayhole · 9 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
199 notes · View notes
Text
When you're self-employed, everyone is your boss
Tumblr media
40 notes · View notes
anaiyascloset · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
A Ring Camera Lookbook
25 notes · View notes
Meanwhile, on Nancy’s Ring cam:
Tumblr media
81 notes · View notes
thoughtportal · 1 year
Video
Your security camera is a part the police and surveillance state
54 notes · View notes
mansorus · 26 days
Text
Tumblr media
4 notes · View notes
hyenaeggs · 4 months
Text
Delivery
Tumblr media
2 notes · View notes
fernreads · 2 years
Link
Ring, Amazon’s perennially controversial and police-friendly surveillance subsidiary, has long defended its cozy relationship with law enforcement by pointing out that cops can only get access to a camera owner’s recordings with [the owner’s] express permission or a court order. But in response to recent questions from Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass., the company stated that it has provided police with user footage 11 times this year alone without either.
Last month, Markey wrote to Amazon asking it to both clarify Ring’s ever-expanding relationship with American police, who’ve increasingly come to rely on the company’s growing residential surveillance dragnet, and to commit to a raft of policy reforms. In a July 1 response from Brian Huseman, Amazon vice president of public policy, the company declined to permanently agree to any of them, including “Never accept financial contributions from policing agencies,” “Never allow immigration enforcement agencies to request Ring recordings,” and “Never participate in police sting operations.”
Although Ring publicizes its policy of handing over camera footage only if the owner agrees — or if judge signs a search warrant — the company says it also reserves the right to supply police with footage in “emergencies,” defined broadly as “cases involving imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to any person.” Markey had also asked Amazon to clarify what exactly constitutes such an “emergency situation,” and how many times audiovisual surveillance data has been provided under such circumstances. Amazon declined to elaborate on how it defines these emergencies beyond “imminent danger of death or serious physical injury,” stating only that “Ring makes a good-faith determination whether the request meets the well-known standard.” Huseman noted that it has complied with 11 emergency requests this year alone but did not provide details as to what the cases or Ring’s “good-faith determination” entailed.
Matthew Guariglia, a policy analyst with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, told The Intercept he encourages any Ring owners concerned about warrantless access of their cameras to enable end-to-end encryption — an option the company declined to make the default setting after being urged to do so by Markey. “I am disturbed that Ring continues to offer, in any situation, warrantless footage from user’s devices despite the fact that once again, police are not the customers for Ring; the people who buy the devices are the customers,” said Guariglia.
Guariglia added that even though the “emergency” exception hypothetically might be warranted in the most dire circumstances, there will always be the risks of “mission creep” and police abuse without any meaningful oversight. “If there is the infrastructure, if there is the channel by which police can request footage without a warrant or consent of the user, under what circumstances they get it is out of our control. I worry that because it’s decided by the police and by somebody at Ring, there will be temptation to use that for increasingly less urgent situations.”
In a statement to The Intercept, Markey said that he believed Amazon and Ring have both lost the benefit of the doubt, despite their purported good-faith efforts. “I’m deeply concerned to learn that the company has repeatedly disclosed users’ recordings to law enforcement without requiring the users’ permission,” the senator added. “This revelation is particularly troubling given that the company has previously admitted to having no policies that restrict how law enforcement can use Ring users’ footage, no data security requirements for law enforcement entities that have users’ footage, and no policies that prohibit law enforcement officers from keeping Ring users’ footage forever.”
43 notes · View notes
yukaioni · 1 year
Text
9 notes · View notes
mememoonbeam · 8 months
Text
are you kidding this is so cute 🤍
2 notes · View notes
callese · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
.
16 notes · View notes
reactionpicarchive · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
16 notes · View notes
winterspass · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
My outfit as seen by my ring cam (honestly I fucking love using the ring cam for selfies lmfao)
6 notes · View notes
willthemonsterswin · 1 year
Note
Do you have any more of the fish eye JD? That had me losing it
yes and its colored properly >:)
Tumblr media
6 notes · View notes
blackbellybella · 1 year
Text
Soooo right after I did the auto response thing I got this video. And I was doing laundry so I didn’t get to see it till now. Like this is the guy I said will just fucking stare at me even before getting the camera and just stares at the ring every time he walks by but this is the first times he’s done that. This is weird right?
Like I feel like I’m crazy, I said before I have a paranoia/ptsd due to trauma when it comes to men and there’s like several living next door. This is not helping.
3 notes · View notes