Tumgik
#do get van helsing
lorereadsclassics7 · 2 years
Text
September 2nd
man is reading this w a modern look making Seward's letter have so many queer undertones when talking to his bestie how accepting of the unusual Van Helsing is
Is also just very sweet how he's trying so hard to help a friend and a loved one
10 notes · View notes
see-arcane · 8 months
Text
Van Helsing: “Mina you should not be involved any further for safety’s sake—“
Jonathan, thinking: Yes, she shouldn’t be put in Dracula’s reach, good good good—
Van Helsing: “—helpful as you’ve been every step of the way, you do still have a chronic case of Being a Girl and so cannot be trusted to keep up with us men and our man-work.”
Jonathan, personal heroes including Mina, Scheherazade, and Mina again, grinding his teeth into dust: …That Is. :) A Way to Frame It. :)
555 notes · View notes
friendrat · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
On April 10th!
104 notes · View notes
abrahamvanhelsings · 2 years
Text
you know for all that we say book van helsing is nothing at all like popular media van helsing, i gotta say. for a man to proclaim "i shall cut off her head and fill her mouth with garlic, and i shall drive a stake through her body" and spew facts about vampires as though he's faced off against them a hundred times before, and then staying alone in a graveyard through the night to make sure a vampire doesn't get out of her tomb while knowing the bigger, badder vampire is out there and might come to visit. that's pretty hardcore. like sure he is the unhinged kindly grandpa we know and love and you never see that in the movies but also i feel like saying that's all he is undersells him by a mile and a half
2K notes · View notes
july-19th-club · 2 years
Text
we've arrived at one of my favorite dracula plot points: mina realizes that if dracula is capable of controlling her by means of a psychic link between them, then that probably goes both ways and she can spy on him
1K notes · View notes
immediatebreakfast · 7 months
Text
There is a dreadful undertone which is starting to grow more, and more each day the crew can't reach Dracula, or the Czarina Catherine. It's right under every conversation Van Helsing and Seward are having while Mina is still next to them, and it was very present today during the hypnosis session.
The guys (specially Van Helsing and Jack) are priming themselves to kill Mina if she ever has the misfortune of doing something deemed "too suspicious." It sounds horrible, but it is right there. Most of the male characters are letting their fear cloud their perspective of Mina, no matter how justified that fear is.
It's so worrying to see Van Helsing and Seward treat anything that Mina does as suspicious. Moreover, it's really sad to read about how Quincey, and Jonathan reacted to Mina's small moment of being possessed. Because yes, that single moment of her rising was probably the Count taking control over the mental link for a second, and the tense atmosphere of the scene only helped to amplify that fear.
Mina is not lost yet, she is not. The fight is not over yet despite the every growing despair. If Jonathan getting colder, and more distant from the rest of the crew as a reaction to this dehumanizing suspicion by the same men who swore to help Mina, then Mina immediate switch into "hostess mode" is her reaction to this too.
She needs them to see that she is capable of being a normal person. Mina must get them tea after the possession to show them that she is fine. She has to prove to them that Mina is still human.
"She could not remember anything, but asked what she had said; when she was told, she pondered over it deeply for a long time and in silence."
Mina is still helping. Despite the suspicion, the rising tension, and the physical and mental toll that is affecting her every time she is hypnotized she is helping. Because just like everyone else Mina is also fighting for her peace, and freedom.
108 notes · View notes
anchy2006 · 2 years
Text
Mrs Westerna has strong well she was getting better so we stopped giving her the pills that were making her better energy
794 notes · View notes
vickyvicarious · 2 years
Text
I would like to, once again, thank Arthur Holmwood for reading between the lines on the "no news is good news" bullshit (at least when it comes to this novel), and doing something about it.
It's Quincey Morris, coming in clutch, but he's only there because Art knows how to ask for help when you need it and is willing to take action.
Honestly, between Art's emotional intelligence/good instincts ("I can tell when people are lying to me about my fiancé's wellbeing, even by omission"), and Quincey passing the common sense test ("where is the blood going?") they're both in the running for most competent despite how little screen time each has had.
618 notes · View notes
heckhellstuff · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
My AUs ? Incomprehensible
Here's a doodle dump of bestie Guide Ranging from few days to 6+ months old
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
I have so so so much more But my dumb little AU went off the rails so badly i have no idea if anyone would listen to my insanity- Guide mentioning she used to lead an Inquisition gave me terminal brainrot and whatever this is crawled out
27 notes · View notes
Text
Entry Five: Date December 14th 1898
I have come to a most disturbing realization.
Dracula appears to have both sex organs native in both male and female humans. I am not certain if they are functional, but the discovery that this creature is in possession of a uterus and ovaries is quite possibly the most destressing thing I have found about the creature aside from when I first learned of his mere existence.
Asking Dracula about it does not ease my confusion for the creature seemed to panic upon being questioned as to why he possessed female sex organs. It appears not even the vampire, himself, realized it which makes me wonder what other sort of strange things I will find as I continue my dissection.
Though this now begs several questions, will I have to worry about female based ailments as I continue my study of the creature. Could he perhaps be susceptible to female hysteria? I do not know and dare I say, I hope not. That would be simply too strange, especially on the discovery that in the past the vampire has taken on the form of a woman before. Apparently he also does not seem to care when it happens, stating that his form means little to him.
I cannot see how that could possibly be the case, and I imagine there's something sinister or even perverse going on when he transforms into that of the fairer sex. I shall keep an eye on this creature, for I cannot fathom as to why he appears to be a hermaphrodite or why he would not care about the shape he takes on. It seems suspicious to me.
25 notes · View notes
lady-dulcinea · 21 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Jessica De Gouw as Mina Murray from the 2013 NBC series Dracula
14 notes · View notes
see-arcane · 6 months
Text
Just tripped and fell into a what-if scenario:
"What if Jonathan really had caught up to Dracula in Piccadilly and killed him in the street?"
Head lopped off. Kukri through the chest. The 'murder victim' turns to dust in full view of the gawking crowd. Then what? Then what??
Piccadilly Police: "So this man beheaded and impaled an aristocrat in the middle of the street."
Witnesses: "He did."
Piccadilly Police: "And the body..?"
Witnesses: "Crumbled into that pile of dust."
Piccadilly Police: "..."
Witnesses: "..."
Piccadilly Police: "...So has he named which magician he's working for or--?"
Witnesses: "No, he's just been busy kicking the dust into the horse dung piles in the gutter."
Of course, this is the best case scenario sillytimes version. Serious version? Jonathan only manages half of the process before some Good Samaritans tackle him; and likely get cut in the process. I bet he could chop Dracula's head off, but not manage the heart-piercing in time. He gets dragged off to jail. The Count's two pieces get taken to the morgue. And now Van Helsing, the Suitors, and Mina are all on a ticking deadline to stake Dracula's heart before sundown with Important Witnesses present to prove Jonathan's innocence and sanity in the slaying...
And if and when that happens?
That means the Drac Attack Pack are responsible for bringing the reality of vampires into the public awareness.
So.
Surprise, everyone!
Imagine the can of worms that would open around them, around the whole concept. Their original plan to head to Castle Dracula to end the Brides gets a LOT of extra tagalong company. Photographers are there. Ditto shady government sorts who, of course, are eager to investigate a way to turn vampirism into a benefit to the Crown. The Drac Attack Pack would be swamped with sensationalism. It'd be a circus.
Which all adds up to a belated understanding for me about just why Dracula had to get away from them in Piccadilly. If he had been caught and killed? God. What a mess it'd be.
127 notes · View notes
mchristelle · 11 months
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
78 notes · View notes
bottombaron · 8 months
Text
it honestly surprises me that i don't hear anything about the very real possibility that Nandor could have sired Dracula
34 notes · View notes
smooth-noob · 8 months
Text
Tumblr media
shocking revelations in todays entries folks
30 notes · View notes
immediatebreakfast · 8 months
Text
This is all cultural context of the readers since different countries have different rites, and myths for handling the dead. Yet, I'm always surprised how the maids just simply stole the little gold crucifix from the recently dead(?) Lucy. The girl that doesn't even have a day of being dead.
"Because," he said sternly, "it is too late—or too early. See!" Here he held up the little golden crucifix. "This was stolen in the night." "How, stolen," I asked in wonder, "since you have it now?" "Because I get it back from the worthless wretch who stole it, from the woman who robbed the dead and the living. Her punishment will surely come, but not through me; she knew not altogether what she did and thus unknowing, she only stole. Now we must wait."
Van Helsing has a very appropiate reaction to the act, he is angry not only at the "stealing from a dead girl" act on itself, but also for what it means to leave a fresh transformed vampire without a symbol of faith to stop them. I do wonder if there could be some religious dutch reasons involved since Van Helsing mentions a punishment.
We sadly don't get Jack's cultural reaction since he is too focused on how Van Helsing is acting today; which is understandable because he is really acting shady, but what was the attitude towards stealing from the dead in victorian england?
Would it have been wrong on the grounds of social class since Lucy was upper class and the maid was in her service? With all of the talk about how crucifixes, and rosaries were seen as idolatrous I don't know if they had religious reasons to discourage it. Maybe it was seen a monetary loss?
Because here in my country Colombia, oh boy there is culture surrounding the stuff of the dead. It's a very hard process to choose what to keep, what to throw away, and what to gift. However, everyone can agree that is very disrespectful to just grab things without consulting with your family, or worse to steal from behind their because grandmas had this [insert object] that I want for me.
Here, our cultural identity that is tied to the supernatural is also tied to the question "what if?" Because as much as we would like to think that some stuff are explained in absolutes. We don't know! You can ask here anyone if they believe in ghosts, and no one will give you a clear answer. Because there are situation that we can't explain, and that question is always left.
Which follows what not to do with the dead: Don't let anyone gift you stuff from their dead relatives because to those dead relatives you are a stranger. Be careful with things tied to certain feelings that the dead in question had for it (for example both my grandma and grandpa were buried with their wedding rings no ifs no buts). Let yourself mourn while deciding these things.
And, don't steal from dead because you don't know their conditions when they died.
If this was a colombian story focused on the supernatural, and Lucy was not a vampire yet came back as a vengeful ghost to haunt that maid for stealing Van Helsing's "gift" from her, I would go "Ja! Serves you right." Because that maid decided to desecrate Lucy's grave by stealing from her.
41 notes · View notes