Since the Lotus update came out, I’ve been thinking about what a new potential “Dark Choco and Chess Choco” storyline could happen, taking into account the events we know
We see a flashback of what happened during the Battle of Dragons with them, then the aftermath with them having miraculously survived, though perhaps separated, and the storyline involves them getting back together and probably reevaluating their mission (and how likely it is it’ll actually succeed). While this could make a cute little story, it has little progression of plot, other than maybe that bit at the end
Another variation that starts out the same as the first, but they end up encountering a dragon, likely Pitaya. Could have them deciding whether their mission is worth it or not. Don’t really have opinions on this one
We yet again have a flashback, but this time they have an encounter with a Dragon Eye, and it goes for Chess Choco, only for Dark Choco to step in at the last moment and sacrifice himself for them, turning to stone. They survive (but are probably mentally scarred) and are eventually found by the Guild group, and are taken back with them to wherever the plot is going on with them. While this is the angsty option and I quite like that, also with Milk and Yam finally finding Dark Choco only for him to be stone and seeing their reactions, unless they have a way to turn him back to normal at this point, it means Dark Choco is basically absent from the story, just being a statue. Also it deprives us of seeing the Chocos interact, as again, one of them is stone, meaning that we don’t get to see their relationship
Another variation of the last one, where one of the Chess twins gets turned to stone, with or without the addition of Dark Choco, meaning it could just be him and that one remaining, or just that lone Chess twin. Again, angsty but it deprives us of character interactions and I feel like the 2/3 survivors option here is the best option
Just some thoughts. I know it was basically just two with variations, but I haven’t been able to come up with much more, just thought I’d share my own thoughts
16 notes
·
View notes
Sometimes i think about how Owen's people in the lab had basically astronaut grade PPE for exploring the upside down.
And then i think about how the kids just run around in there without any of that and breathe in the weird spores that fly around in the air.
3 notes
·
View notes
One of the most generally useful things to come out of Hbomberguy's plagiarism video and Todd in the Shadows' similar video on misinformation is how they bring transparency to the internet phenomenon of "I made up a guy to get mad at".
Seriously, I've seen people make up a lot of stupid shit on the internet over the years and it's often just a manipulative attempt to paint a group of marginalized people in a bad light.
That's the TL;DR version of this post.
ANYWAY here is the long version
Those videos are mostly about James Somerton's plagiarism of other queer people's work. However I'd like to talk about that 20-30% of Somerton's original writing- and oh boy. It's mostly about complaining about White Straight Women and misgendering well-known trans creators such as Rebecca Sugar and calling Becky Albertalli a straight woman while it's pretty common knowledge that she was forced to out herself as bi because she received so much harassment over "being a cishet woman who appropriates LGBT+ stories".
One thing that irks me especially is how in his Killing Stalking and Gay Shipping videos Somerton brings up how straight women/ teen girl shippers exploit gay men for their personal sexual fantasies. This gets brought up several times in his videos.
Being all up and arms about Somerton being a "White Cis Gay Who Hates Women and Queer People tm" is not that useful because the kind of rhetoric he's using is extremely common in fandom and LGBT+ spaces on Tumblr, TikTok and Twitter. We really don't need to bring Somerton's identity to this since he is in no way an unique example.
It's hypocritical to make this about an individual person when I've seen A TON of posts, tweets and videos where queer people talk about these Sinister Straight Women who are supposedly out there fetishizing and exploiting queer men. It's pretty clear to me that this is just an excuse to shit on women and queer people for having any sexual interests. At worst these comments are spreading misinformation about BL, a form of media that has been excessively studied by both Asian feminists and Asian queer women.
This all sounds really familiar and I think it's good that people are calling it out as what it is: misogyny and transphobia. I'd also point out the potentially racist motives behind being this hypervigilant about Asian media.
People can absolutely be misogynist regardless of gender or orientation. I really don't know why we need to create some kind of made up enemy to get mad at. I actually think it's almost sinister how "anti-fujoshi" people call Slash shippers and fujoshi misogynists or claim that they have internalised misogyny while being dismissive about women's interests and creative pursuits under Japanese obscenity laws, China's censorship, book bans in American schools and various other disadvances that are part of being a queer and/or female creator.
I think we shouldn't be naive about the bad faith actors who want to turn queer people against each other. For example Fujoshi.info mentions anti-gender (TERF, GC etc) movement using this kind of rhetoric as well.
Anyway if you want to read more:
- about the false info around BL fandom fujoshi.info
-There is the scholar Thomas Baudinette who studies gay media in Japan. Here is a podcast with him and the scholar Khursten Santos
-James Welker is a BL scholar as well. Here is a podcast interview about the new international BL article collection he edited.
-I've already talked about this Youtube channel by KrisPNatz and his great Killing Stalking video that actually engages with the themes of the manhwa
- There is also HR Coleman's thesis DO NOT FEED THE FETISHIZERS: BOYS LOVE FANS RESISTANCE AND CHALLENGE OF PERCEIVED REPUTATION where she interviews 36 BL fans and actually breaks down why fetishization has become such a huge talking point in the fandom discourse. Spoilers, it's mostly about young queer people and women being worried that they will get judged and pathologized for their interest in anything sexual.
-Great podcast about Danmei and censorship with Liang Ge
2K notes
·
View notes
The way you draw Micheal Afton, both scooped and pre-scooping, is soooo pretty I love him!!! Like he was already my favourite character but your design and art made me love him even more!!!! 💜💜💜💜
Like if the girl on the right is as beautiful as the girl on the left 💜
2K notes
·
View notes
There's a theory that Little Ghost was Dozer so that's fun to think about. Saves cookies from dying like it did :]
Considering that Princess was the first instance of such a royal cookie family before Kingdom so it can be assumed that her family was the royals in question. Some of the comics were canon with the instance of Princess' mom and Dark Choco's connection with that family which makes sense with kingdom
Oh really? I didn’t know that. But that’s nice
Yeah admittedly it probably is just Princess Cookie’s family, I just have confirmation bias sometimes/kind of an obsession
4 notes
·
View notes
What do we think? I think he's like the coolest scientist to ever science
HEY HAPPY 2000 FOLLOWERS‼️HOW DID THAT HAPPEN SO QUICK?????
I'm genuinely so shocked about that I'm so so glad you're all enjoying this AU so far hehehe:D
Also I just made the 1000 followers celebration post like a month ago or something??wow
Here's the guy ‼️‼️ I wanted to practice drawing him quickly and in different poses. I think I achieved that, all this was made with just the lasso fill tool it was soooo fun and I loved not being worried about details just SHAPE
ALL SHAPE (and colors)
488 notes
·
View notes
it's a pet peeve of mine when ppl frame Andrew as hating Aaron and being needlessly cruel to him... bc while yes, their relationship is fractured and strained, Andrew genuinely cares about his brother and wants the best for him, he just doesn't know how to show that in a normal way.
like he might not know how to express it in a healthy manner but Andrew LOVES Aaron, like he truly just wants Aaron to be healthy and safe. It's like, his whole Thing. Aaron is one of the most important people in his life. Andrew wants him around. He'd do anything to protect him.
I guarantee Andrew wants to be emotionally close to Aaron too, he just doesn't have the tools to do that and the thought of letting someone in terrifies him. He also has no concept of what a healthy sibling relationship looks like, so he has no frame of reference to work from.
510 notes
·
View notes
say it with me everybody: personal health is completely immaterial to morality, including mental health. leading a mentally unhealthy lifestyle (or what you perceive as a mentally unhealthy lifestyle) does not a bad person make. no one has to socialize, exercise, have healthy coping mechanisms, or lead (what you perceive as) a fulfilling life with fulfilling hobbies in the same way that no one has to go to the doctor to get a broken bone reset. both of those types of management of personal health are likely to be beneficial to the individual, but they are in no way moral requirements or debts owed to society. they do not actually say anything about a person's principles, personality, or actions towards others. additionally, people know themselves and their own situations better than you do. maybe a person judges that the physical and financial toll of going to the doctor outweigh the benefit of getting their bone reset, maybe a person just does not have the capacity to develop healthy coping mechanisms at this point in their life, and yes, maybe a person feels like they are totally fulfilled by "media based" hobbies alone and would feel no difference in their life if they picked up a loom. just like. let people be sick without accusing them of being representative of the lazy, degenerated state of modern society.
897 notes
·
View notes