robbie bobbie

Just seen Narcissistic abuse tag. No cat images. No memes. Only people Venting, and Reposting tweets. SAD!

thinking about how even after draxum thought that lou ruined his plan and destroyed his lab that throughout season one hed still be like “the GREAT lou jitsu” like bro you are that down bad for this man huh

i gave him cat ears

wait did i never post this here

as my she/they girlfriend always quotes, "I may be cringe but I am free" so have some self ship suckah

they look like mites hanging around an ingrown hair here idk

medival beekeeper giorno X plague doctor fugo

it doesn’t matter wether AI art is real art or not. “what is art?” is a question that has been answered a million times in as many different ways. it’s a theoretical question that we do not need to answer in order to understand AI generated images and the place of AI in art today.

AI image generators are trained on data skimmed from the internet. this includes images that are not in the public domain. artists and individuals do not have the ability to opt out of this selection. they are not warned, asked for permission, or able to give or take back consent.

there is no transparency in the dataset on which AI image generators are trained. no way for users to know wether or not the prompt they give results in an image based on work from people who did not consent. not even AI developers have access to that information. there is no way to remove specific datapoints from an AI’s training either, so creators cannot even retroactively have their content removed from algorithms.

this is what matters. not the ethereal nature of art, but the fact that real life artists are having their work stolen without the option to give or to revoke consent.

I don’t care if AI art is real art and also don’t care if you do have a strong opinion on the matter. none of this is relevant. if AI art is not real art it is exploitative of content creators and artists. if AI art is real art it is still exploitative of content creators and artists. it is still immoral and of dubious legality, still harmful, still disrespectful.

AI art creators: you would have nothing without the millions of images the tool you are using was trained on. do you want to spit in the face of all of those who made your creations possible? if so, go fuck yourself. if you do care about artists then stop using AI image generators. stop using them until there is full transparency in datasets, until people have a choice to consent or not to their work being used. AI could be ethical, but now, it isn’t, not a single one of them is. the entire industry is built on foundations of theft and exploitation.

ceasing to post AI images isn’t enough. stop giving silicone valley AI startups web traffic. stop showing them you like their product. stop using the AI, stop helping it progress, stop feeding it prompts.

AI art may be art. it may not be. there is no wrong answer and it doesn’t fucking matter. stop exploiting artists, stop facilitating the exploitation of artists, stop stealing from creators. stop thinking of art as a nebulous and detached thing, stop thinking of images online as free of context. I am begging you to start caring about artists.

this is the kindest prophecy i've ever had the priviledge of hearing. like the wind rustling morning flowers, the breathing of a loved one, like being read yuri while laying my head on somebody's lap.

stranger things as text posts pt. 2 for ur viewing pleasure

Are you a zionist

wtf bro

latest episode of my special interest is causing me an anxiety attack like there was no trigger warning wtf

this isnt even the first time they've done stuff like this?

David Tennant in interviews is just a Nice Scottish Man and then every director he works with goes you are a SLUT!!! And you are SO SO SAD!!

I think I speak for everyone when I ask

me when the emotionally repressed character is revealed to have had something happen in their childhood that was completely out of their control but changed them in a way they can never come back from