You’ve heard “lady in the streets, freak in the sheets” but get ready for “socially awkward freak in the streets, ungodly slut in the sheets”

I've recently found this truly adorable series by @superherotiger called "Kindred Spirits", and lemme tell you, it got my head in a spin. So, I drew this :)

I'm obsessed with people who're obsessed with art, painting, music, dance, reading, poetries, poems, books, cats, moon, stars their pretty pretty obsessions.

They're rare

Where are they ? Raise your hands i wanna see those cute people who have an obsession like me.

who thinks roman's the one who put in the copyright claim against jey saying yeet

This is what war looks like. This is what war does to people. (This is retaliation btw, I was 3 times worse)

i love my black lineart man coloured lines are too much work for me

Who else in the mood to get their pronouns tattooed to their fucking forehead.

I do think it’s strange that Cox mentions suffragists in the video, as none of the characters she is discussing are suffragists or are taking on or attempting to take on any similar role; suffragists made that choice within a particular public sphere that none of these characters occupy in a similar way. (And, of course, suffragists made that choice in part because when there WERE suffragists who dressed in what was perceived as an unfeminine way they were so roundly mocked and socially ostracized that most of them stopped.) To say that choices made in public from a PR standpoint = personal choices they would’ve made out of the spotlight is not an argument with much foundation, I think, and the underlying idea that a True feminist would be wearing feminine clothing always, rather than trying to navigate her own gender identity, mental and physical comfort, and practical concerns the best she could (which very well might involve wearing traditionally feminine clothes always! but also very well might not) seems disingenuous to me, and is an argument I myself am very uncomfortable with

I think the reason she brings up suffragists is that they're commonly recognized as Ur-examples of early feminism. So if Even Many Suffragists were feminine-presenting feminists, then the trope in historical fiction that you MUST decry feminine fashion always to be a truly Progressive Female Character becomes even more ridiculous by contrast.

And now I'm wondering if you've even watched the video, because like. Yeah, she talks about how suffragists dressed the way they often did for Respectability Reasons. There's a whole section about Amelia Bloomer, and how her bid for dress reform failed because it was unfortunately proving a distraction with the press. That's...that's literally in the video.

The gist of the argument is not "true feminists are feminine." The gist of the argument is "it does not make sense, given the real struggles of early feminists and the historical context around gender in that era, to have a character who is trying to make formal strides in the cause of women's rights do so by wearing masculine clothing in public." I assume there's an "unless the work in question acknowledges that she's hurting her argument in some ways by doing so and thus distracting the media" clause, but no movie or TV show has done that yet.

Also, nowhere does Cox say that true feminists wear feminine clothing? Once again, you're taking this video about FICTIONAL TROPES as some kind of personal prescriptivist screed. It is about nothing more or less than the fact that modern writers are prone to having female historical characters make a big stink about how awful and oppressive feminine clothes are to establish that they're interesting, intelligent, and dynamic- often in contrast to more conventionally feminine counterparts onscreen, who are treated as lesser beings for their presentation. Even when it makes no historical sense for them to do so, or goes against the source material being adapted.

Forgive me, but there seems to be some critical thinking missing in your argument.

Kind of related to my prev post but-

You know, I was so happy when the anime adaptation of I'm in love with the villaness came out. I had read the novel and the manga and was in love with the work of inori-sensei.

And I'm more than satisfied by the anime. The generic (I don't know how many time I listened to Raise Y/our Hands! Lol), the art and animation ...

and finally the voice acting.the japanese and English one are amazing. The voice well chosed, the emotion and tone, etc. See, when Rei said "step on me harder"(don't remember the exact phrase) I felt that was genuine, in bot language.

So when I saw that they did a french dub to I rushed as fast as I could. I expected something as the same level as the other dub.

But I was disappointed. Like bro just took the most generic, overused in animated shows voices, and they didn't even tried to put a emotion to it (exaggerating but you see my point). Bro didn't even translated that ace attorney reference right T^T.

I could ramble for hours about than but gonna stop here. Too much posting for me.

How crazy to be for katsuki’s bday this year......................................................

ace subtype: kink is the only thing that makes sex appealing