Hold a loaded gun to my helplessly masochistic head and tell me I can only say two phrases while you rape me; "i want you to shoot me" for when i need to cum and "i want you to shoot inside me" to encourage you to finish sooner so i can be safe. And if I cum you paint the ground with my brains. Obviously.
144 notes
·
View notes
ok, this one’s been percolating in my mind for a while. i’ve heard people say you need to work up to involving a dynamic or kinks in a sexual relationship and i disagree. maybe if you’re talking about, like, intense cnc or sadism, but as for d/s and lighter stuff, i don’t see why two adults can’t negotiate that the first time they have sex. i have, in fact some of my best experiences were first times with new people. “but someone could push you to do something you’re not comfortable with” that can happen with vanilla sex and it can happen the twentieth time, not just the first. “it could be a problem if one person has significantly more experience with bdsm” it could be a problem if one person has significantly more experience with sex. i’m not saying there aren’t risks, i’m saying they’re not specific to introducing a dynamic with a new/casual partner (actually they’re not even specific to sex, but y’all wouldn’t relish an aromantic’s opinion about romantic consent). tbh it just sounds like some of you aren’t very good at communicating or being aware of boundaries. i actually feel like it’s a sort of ‘hoisted by your own petard’ thing where like, you’re saying a dynamic requires especial attention to that, so then if you’re speaking from experience shouldn’t you (that is to say, people in “the community”) be especially good at it? if you personally don’t want to introduce a dynamic with new/casual partners that’s fine! but some of us do and are capable of doing so, and having vanilla sex at first against our mutual wishes wouldn’t serve any purpose.
59 notes
·
View notes
Imagine demon form Levi attracted to blood like a shark, eating mc out on their period
45 notes
·
View notes
Honestly the whole "only virgins become vampires" not only is inconsistent with Alucard and Mina Harker, but a lot of terror goes away. Fear of becoming a bloodthirsty monster you once feared and aware of it should be universal. There's a reason why the First Mate jumped. There's a reason why Jonathan vowing to let Mina turn him into a vampire hits. There's a reason why there was the looming threat of Mina turning the men into Dracula's "jackals". With the virginity rule so much tension goes away.
Yeah, Dracula's vampire rules are kind of prone to being screwed with in every adaptation and spinoff under the sun.
I think Hirano just threw the virginity thing (and the 'They have to be the opposite sex!!!' thing) in so he could have the threat of the zombies 'ghouls' to play around with rather than an endless legion of vampires. If it were the novel's rules, that'd mean
A) Way more intelligent vampires to deal with every arc
B) A much higher body count as vampires tried to avoid making new vampires, opting for full slaughter instead. Which would have worked super well in a manga as grisly as Hellsing! But Hirano wanted his un-zombies, so what can you do :/
24 notes
·
View notes
Anyone who's natural conclusion to "bad in bed" means being a bottom, I'm coming to beat you with my cane. The fuck is wrong with yall turning into the worst of toxic sex culture, even for the shitty joke, born of straight up misogyny and the worst parts of masculinity under the developed patriarchy where taking a dick up a hole makes you the lesser with a line that literally just says "He's bad in bed".
Edit for clarity in my issue; it's the reaction, I fully meant to type "being a bottom and being a sub" as the implications I'm seeing being "pleasure receiver bad for not giving back" is a very "Don't apply queer terms to your shit understandings of sex dynamics that are not cis het" reaction from me, a dyke.
35 notes
·
View notes