Tumgik
#religious observance
thelcsdaily · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
A Holiday Greeting
May the joy of the season envelop you and your loved ones with smiles and treasured memories as the holidays progress. I hope you have a joyous and festive Christmas.
Thank you for all your support this past year.
“It is Christmas every time you let God love others through you.”—Saint Teresa of Calcutta.
260 notes · View notes
alwaysbewoke · 29 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
conservatives are the worst!
34 notes · View notes
uboatheflesh · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
me w infinite pig harvest (me on guitar, wayne of Religious Observance on vocals, dase of Well on bass, scott of The World At A Glance on drums and res of Diploid on noise. For some reason only had photos of me in shot, none of Dase/Scott for this set on my HDD at least. (Also forgot who photographed, DM if it was you)
30 notes · View notes
watermonkeystuff · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
Religious Observance live.
10 notes · View notes
redshift-13 · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
https://twitter.com/jbouie/status/1530165811016609792
3 notes · View notes
authne · 6 months
Text
Dussehra or Vijayadashami: A Festival of Good over Evil
Dussehra, otherwise called Vijayadashami, is a significant Hindu festival commended consistently toward the finish of Navaratri. It denotes the victory of good over evil and is seen in various structures of the nation. The festival is commended on the 10th day of the long stretch of Ashvin in the Hindu schedule, which ordinarily falls in the Gregorian long stretches of September and October.…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
1 note · View note
SLW 2023, episode 35 (2023_09_30)
Broadcast: KTQA-LP 95.3 FM Tacoma, streaming address at KTQA.org
Voice-Over/Intro, music in the background: playlist selection #1
01. Strap On Halo - When They Come For You (Seattle, Washington 2016)
02. The Mission - Severina [Radio Edit](Leeds, England 1987)
03. The Chameleons - Swamp Thing (Middleton, England 1986)
04. Theatre Of Hate - Rebel Without A Brain (London, England 1981)
05. Molchat Doma - Ne Smeshno (Minsk, Belarus 2020)
06. IX Reflections - Reflection (Moscow, Russia 2021)
07. Alice Cooper - Clones (We're All)(Los Angeles, California 1980)
Voice-Over/First Break, music in the background: Ron Grainer - Main Title Theme (The Prisoner OST (BBC T.V. 1968))
08. Nuxx Vomica - Easy Go (New York City, New York 2023)
09. Shrinkwrap Killers - I Think the Sirens are Coming For Me (Oakland, California 2019)
10. Executioner's Mask - Contempt (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 2022)
11. The Art Intel - Saturnine (Dallas, Texas 2022)
12. Replicas - Breath (Tacoma, Washington 2021)
13. Licorice Chamber - Just Like The Horror Movies (Tacoma, Washington 2022)
Voice-Over/Top of The Hour Break, music in the background: Albert Elms - Fight Between No. 6 and No. 14 (The Prisoner OST (BBC T.V. 1968))
14. Progenitor - Treasures of Perversion (Tacoma, Washington 2023)
15. Vaulderie - Symphony of Hunger (Tacoma, Washington 2022)
16. Cemetery Lights - Abide With Me (Rhode Island 2022)
17. Carnation Maze - I (Russian Federation 2020)
18. Kawir - Medea (Athens, Greece 2020)
Voice-Over/Third Break, music in the background: Albert Elms - No. 2 Has No. 6 Followed to the Stone Boat (The Prisoner OST (BBC T.V. 1968))
19. Religious Observance - Waterboard (Melbourne, Australia 2021)
20. Iron Maiden - The Prisoner (Leyton, England 1982)
21. The Specials - We Sell Hope (Coventry, England 2019)
Voice-Over/Last Break, music in the background: Ron Grainer - Full Version: Main Title Theme (The Prisoner OST (BBC T.V. 1968))
0 notes
campbellzc · 1 year
Text
The History Of Good Friday
Good Friday is a Christian holiday that commemorates the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ at Calvary. It is observed during Holy Week as part of the Paschal Triduum and is considered one of the most solemn days in the Christian calendar. From the early days of Christianity, Good Friday was observed as a day of sorrow, penance, and fasting, a characteristic that finds expression in the German…
View On WordPress
0 notes
tellingittash · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
Religious Studies Term Of The Day: Vrat
Hey everyone! Today, I wanted to talk about vrats. A vrat is a vow. However, it is not just as simple as “I vow to do this or that.” This is a religious ceremony pertaining to this type of vow, commonly done with fasting, a narration of the tale that led to the vow, preparation of food, art, and discourse. They are common among women and popular in Northern India especially after the film Hail Santoshi Ma, a film about how good it is to make vows to the goddess Santoshi Ma. Common types of vrats include the following:
For a married woman to promote the woman of her husband and family
For a widow to protect her family and her departed husband
For single woman to find a good husband
For whatever individualistic goal a person might have
To maintain a certain function of life
These vows are important yo think about because the types of vows being taken tell a lot about how people view the world, especially since they are made to gods and have religious and social implications. Anyway, just wanted to share this interesting term I’ve come across and I have one more Hinduism term I’d like to share tomorrow before I move on to another tradition. But hey, I would like to put it out there that I’m always welcoming of other voices on vrats and I hope that everyone is having a great day and staying safe out there.
1 note · View note
meruz · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
i havent been in front of my computer much this past month so i mostly just have a lot of pictures of my sketchbook
2K notes · View notes
hecksupremechips · 8 days
Text
Tumblr media
Time to break in the new apron!!!
87 notes · View notes
utilitycaster · 7 days
Text
Ok I'm probably going to regret reinventing 17th century European religious philosophy here but:
Ludinus's issue with the gods as stated to Imogen and Fearne (and I will state right now that we know he was lying or deliberately misleading at points in that conversation so I don't exactly take him at his word, but let's assume he does mean this) is that they did not prevent the Calamity. I have the following questions.
Does he have any loyalty/feelings about the Titans given that they would have killed all the people in the era of the Schism, ie, the gods averted that Calamity? My guess is no, which means that whole avenue of discussing the Titans was something of a dead end.
How should Calamity have been averted? The Prime Deities during the Age of Arcanum largely let people do what they wanted, which is what led to one of those mortals releasing the Betrayer Gods. Should the gods have struck down Vespin Chloras before he actually did anything, Minority Report style? Can the gods even predict based on the actions of a single individual or small group, because my guess is they can't, particularly since within the current stream of gameplay they absolutely cannot [ie, the reason the Changebringer can't tell FCG to stay or run is because Matt Mercer is the Changebringer and he doesn't know how people will roll; you do need to consider the medium here]. But if they could: so you think they should strike down mortals on the basis of thoughtcrimes? Or control them? In that case, why is Aeor a problem? There's a lot you can argue is justified once you permit the gods to override free will and kill people over mere potential for catastrophe.
On that note, Laerryn both was an unwitting architect of the Calamity (shorted on energy and then killed the Tree of Names, which served as a core planar defense system) but also averted the worst of it. Did the lives she saved by preventing the rise of Rau'shan and Ka'Mort outweigh the lives she took by destroying the Tree of Names? How should the gods have reacted?
Should, perhaps, the gods have all sealed themselves away earlier - perhaps post-Schism? If so, then the issue isn't the Divine Gate, now is it? Should the gods intervene or not intervene? Should they remove themselves or no? It feels like the issue isn't that they distanced themselves so that they can do less in the world, particularly if you wish to kill them, but that you really want to fucking kill them and they made that somewhat more difficult.
How do we know the gods (for example) didn't save Laudna? She was hanged and she's still alive; Morri would probably count this as saving her and I don't see the same desire to wipe out all Archfey. [real talk I find most discussion of Laudna specifically to be...incomprehensibly ignorant in its refusal to acknowledge that everything about it is player agency related, whether it's the story that the cast played out for Vox Machina or the decisions Marisha specifically made in creating the character, ie, do you think Matt should have said "well you can't play a Hollow One because that would mean the gods didn't save you" not to mention the fact that again, we are playing this within a game system where the existence Deus Ex Machina would in fact fucking suck ass; but even setting aside those reasons why this argument is stupid, it's still stupid. It's like a layer cake of stupid.] Again: do you want more intervention or less? Killing them guarantees less.
I'm assuming the problem with the Calamity is the vast loss of life, in which case, what's the math on how many people have been killed by the Vanguard or Imperium in the pursuit of unleashing Predathos? How many more will die?
If the release of Predathos doesn't result in the immediate demise of all the gods, and the Divine Gate is down, why isn't this a recipe for Calamity 2? What was the motivation for killing the gods again?
Should we kill mortal diviners who do not do all within their power to stop terrible things that may come to pass? If the issue is that some people have power without working for it, why haven't we killed all the sorcerers?
Should we be listening to a single word from someone who consumes random fey to live longer, and that's just the start of the CVS receipt of atrocities?
Is there a point where one's deeply held beliefs due to one's own personal trauma become invalidated due to one's actions as a result of that trauma? If so, why is the limit for Orym "is okay with killing people who are trying, directly, to kill you (which, frankly, isn't even a trauma response, that's just called not wanting to die, which I highly recommend as a personal philosophy), and gets upset when people defend those knowingly collaborating with his family's murderers" and the limit for Vanguard generals "family abandonment/just. buckets of murder of innocents./child soldier recruitment in multiple different contexts/eating fey as biohacking/destroying an entire city and the surrounding forest for hundreds of years (ongoing)/imperialism in multiple different contexts/I was going to make a gallows humor joke about how while neither exist in-world they've violated the Geneva Convention AND the IRB for testing on human subjects multiple times over but actually those both are in fact written in a lot of the same blood/probably some others that I'm forgetting"
77 notes · View notes
oldshrewsburyian · 1 month
Text
All right, thoughtful friends of Tumblr, I have a question particularly for those of you who are religiously observant, and particularly for those who follow what are minority religions in the US. The question is about how to effectively use my Christian privilege, and the backstory is this. This semester, my teaching schedule conflicted with Maundy Thursday (start of the Easter Triduum, commemoration of the institution of the Eucharist, officially a Big Deal; also the start of three days of non-normal sleeping, fasting, and church-going.) So I asked my supervisors about policies for rescheduling an evening seminar. "Work it out yourself," I was told.
I was mad about this. I like to think that maybe someone following a minority religion would have received more support, if only for reasons of optics or fear of a lawsuit, but... I don't know. I rescheduled the seminar ("What do you do on Maundy Thursday?" asked a student.) Partly out of spite (!), I put on automatic replies to last from Thursday evening through Sunday, explaining that my email response time will be delayed. Because if a hand-wavy "oh, you can work it out" is the response of the higher-ups, my wild guess is that asking for reasonable religious accommodations is not an institutional norm. I still have a niggling feeling that, while I don't want to make a stink on my own account, this might be a situation that I could/should use to benefit others.
45 notes · View notes
wonder-worker · 1 month
Text
"[Elizabeth Woodville's] piety as queen seems to have been broadly conventional for a fifteenth-century royal, encompassing pilgrimages, membership of various fraternities, a particular devotion to her name saint, notable generosity to the Carthusians, and the foundation of a chantry at Westminster after her son was born there. ['On other occasions she supported planned religious foundations in London, […] made generous gifts to Eton College, and petitioned the pope to extend the circumstances in which indulgences could be acquired by observing the feast of the Visitation']. One possible indicator of a more personal, and more sophisticated, thread in her piety is a book of Hours of the Guardian Angel which Sutton and Visser-Fuchs have argued was commissioned for her, very possibly at her request."
-J.L. Laynesmith, "Elizabeth Woodville: The Knight's Widow", "Later Plantagenet and Wars of the Roses Consorts: Power, Influence, Dynasty"
#historicwomendaily#elizabeth woodville#my post#friendly reminder that there's nothing indicating that Elizabeth was exceptionally pious or that her piety was 'beyond purely conventional'#(something first claimed by Anne Crawford who simultaneously claimed that Elizabeth was 'grasping and totally lacking in scruple' so...)#EW's piety as queen may have stood out compared to former 15th century predecessors and definitely stood out compared to her husband#but her actions in themselves were not especially novel or 'beyond normal' and by themselves don't indicate unusual piety on her part#As Laynesmith's more recent research observes they seem to have been 'broadly conventional'#A conclusion arrived at Derek Neal as well who also points out that in general queens and elite noblewomen simply had wider means#of 'visible material expression of [their] personal devotion' - and also emphasizes how we should look at their wider circumstances#to understand their actions (eg: the death of Elizabeth's son George in 1479 as a motivating factor)#It's nice that we know a bit about Elizabeth's more personal piety - for eg she seems to have developed an attachment to Westminster Abbey#It's possible her (outward) piety increased across her queenship - she undertook most of her religious projects in later years#But again - none of them indicate the *level* of her piety (ie: they don't indicate that she was beyond conventionally pious)#By 1475 it seems that contemporaries identified Cecily Neville as the most personally devout from the Yorkist family#(though Elizabeth and even Cecily's sons were far greater patrons)#I think people also assume this because of her retirement to Westminster post 1485#which doesn't work because 1) we don't actually know when she retired? as Laynesmith says there is no actual evidence for the traditional#date of 12 February 1487#2) she had very secular reasons for retiring (grief over the death of her children? her lack of dower lands or estates which most other#widows had? her options were very limited; choosing to reside in the abbey is not particularly surprising. it's a massive and unneeded jump#to claim that it was motivated solely by piety (especially because it wasn't a complete 'retirement' in the way people assume it was)#I think historians have a habit of using her piety as a GOTCHA!' point against her vilification - which is a flawed and stupid argument#Elizabeth could be the most pious individual in the world and still be the pantomime villain Ricardians/Yorkists claim she was#They're not mutually exclusive; this line of thinking is useless#I think this also stems from the fact that we simply know very little about Elizabeth as an individual (ie: her hobbies/interests)#certainly far less than we do for other prominent women Margaret of Anjou; Elizabeth of York;; Cecily Neville or Margaret Beaufort#and I think rather than emphasizing that gap of knowledge her historians merely try to fill it up with 'she was pious!'#which is ... an incredibly lackluster take. I think it's better to just acknowledge that we don't know much about this historical figure#ie: I do wish that her piety and patronage was emphasized more yes. but it shouldn't flip too far to the other side either.
22 notes · View notes
watermonkeystuff · 8 months
Text
Tumblr media
Religious Observance live.
4 notes · View notes
cto10121 · 4 months
Text
Twilight Clown Takes—Part 4
What is it about YouTube and its breeding ground for Twilight clownery???? Some of it is very basic clownery, too. Also, the fake outrage on behalf of the Quileutes by engaging in racist interpretations of the text is…something else. Regardless, there I came upon the feast, and so I shall eat.
“The Wolves Are Savage” and Other Racisms
Tumblr media
What.
You mean those same books that described the vampires in the same way as beasts, who not only growl and roar and snarl, but literally cannot smell blood without going literally crazy like sharks? The same books that described vampires as almost entirely solitary creatures who don’t usually form covens (because then they would turn against each other in competition for their human prey? The same books that had nothing but evil red-eyed vampires (James, Victoria, the Volturi) until the very last book of the series where we are introduced to sympathetic non-vegetarian vampires (Garrett, the Amazonians, etc.)?
Meanwhile the werewolves keep their reason and intelligence intact while they’re in their wolf forms and do not suffer from bloodlust. Their dangerousness comes from their youth and inexperience in shifting—the oldest of the pack is Sam at 18 and he was literally the first and only one to do it without help.
The books adore the Cullens. But it makes it damn clear that they (and the Denalis) are the exceptions that prove the rule. Otherwise Twilight vampires are sociopathic beasts and, as Edward explicitly said in book one, the Quileutes are right to keep their distance. And no, this wasn’t by accident or ~bad writing. Meyer is deliberate in her framing, as well as her characterization of the wolves.
Tumblr media
Tfw your accusation of racism is racist
Bella asked Jacob if he could stop being a werewolf because she mistakenly thought him and his wolf buddies were literally killing people. When she learned otherwise, she was literally, “Oh, no, Jake, I’m fine with you turning into a giant wolf. That doesn’t bother me at all.” (This is near VERBATIM, not even joking). Bella is a monsterfucker, after all. She’s just not into that kind of bestiality.
Tumblr media
Tfw your accusation of racism is racist
Yes, because imprinting is something the wolves 100% have control over and it’s something they can reject. There is nothing random about imprinting at all.
Otherwise—once again—the wolves have vastly more control over their wolf forms than the vampires over their thirst (the Cullens and Denalis excepted). And of course, their body counts are close to zero—compare them to the Cullens and Denalis. Only Sam has injured another human and that was by accident. Even the hothead Paul has no kills or injuries, whereas his counterpart Emmett has at least three.
MORMONISM OMG
Tumblr media
Because Mormonism is the only religion that values and reveres close family ties. Only Mormonism supports the patriarchal family and believes in the organization of society through the familial unit. Only Mormonism is heteronormative and actively homophobic. No other culture or religion gives a fuck.
(Also, the Prodigal Son??? Literally the most common and basic Biblical allusion ever. Literally every major writer has alluded to it, including Shakespeare. It is not just a Mormon thing, oh God 😭😭😭😭😭😭 This kind of clownery eats itself).
Bella Hate Dumb Round ♾️
Tumblr media
Bella turned down Mike and told him explicitly that it would hurt Jessica’s feelings if she went with him to the dance. She did go to La Push with him and her friends and was happy that it was “so easy” to please Mike. She rescued Angela from having to answer Jessica’s annoying questions about Eric by changing the subject. She helped Angela and Jessica find dresses and explicitly enjoyed their girls’ night out in Port Angeles. She had zero opinion on Lauren until she overheard her shit talking Bella (literally) behind her back. She listened to Jessica’s date with Mike and was glad it went all right.
Bella being mean to her friends is clownery so easily debunked—at worst, she is not particularly close to any of them except Angela. If she was reserved or distant with them, it was because she hates any and all attention to herself, period. It was her first day at a new school where everyone knew each other, and was already overwhelmed with introductions and learning her schedule and teachers’s and classmates’s names. The behavior Edward notices in Midnight Sun does not go against her character in Twilight at all and is a continuation of this self-abnegating tendency.
Tumblr media
Edward literally went to Italy to get himself killed by the vampire elite and explicitly said that he could not live in a world where Bella did not exist. Before that, he basically admitted that when he wasn’t hunting Victoria he curled up into a ball and let the despair take him. Meanwhile Bella did not consider suicide (though ~just barely) because of Charlie and Renée. After her one week coma period she did make an effort at keeping up appearances, which included getting all A’s even in her weakest subject, Calculus.
It’s disgusting, all right: A male character who cannot live without his woman. What kind of a message is that sending to our poor impressionable boys???!!!!!
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Didn’t Edward literally stop murdering child molesters and pedophiles because his conscience got to him that it was, indeed, still murder? And didn’t at least one clown still complain about how Mormon it was of him to care for human life? Now the clowns insist Edward doesn’t care about humans and humanity at all.
Even if Edward did care only about Carlisle’s disappointment, it wasn’t because he considers himself his perfect son. If anything Edward suffers from the same kind of self-esteem issues as Bella—in New Moon, he flatly denies Aro’s praise/assertion that his self-control puts Carlisle to shame. Edward thinks of Carlisle because he loves Carlisle like a father and thinks the world of him. He did save him from permanent death, after all.
17 notes · View notes