lancelot is like if you made a knight who’s a lady love a lady who’s a lord and a lord who’s a knight and a knight who’s a king and a king who’s a loser

I came to the realization that two gender-fluid people dating is Schrödinger's queer couple. At any given moment they are both cis and trans, both gay and straight. You won't know until you open the box.

Saw a post about an SY!SQQ AU that, upon transmigration, the System genderbent SQQ's body & the implications thereof. So, now I'm thinking about such things...

and honestly? Trans woman SQQ is very fun & good, don't get me wrong. But what I think would be even funnier is "accidentally gender fluid/bi-gender Shen Qingqiu" because obviously he's still a man, despite the physical changes.

(and as such, obviously can't bathe/etc around women, because he's a man & it would be inappropriate! It's definitely not because he's not interested in women...)

Except for when she's not a man (because of the physical changes). This is usually around Luo Binghe, because SQQ is doing an insane amount of mental gymnastics so s/he can be straight. And it's only natural that she's attracted to Binghe & his protagonist's halo like this, because she's a woman.

Schrodinger's gender all the way down. Both true & false in perpetuity.

To be fair I don't know how gender fluid work, so I am fine if loki is one gender. But I furious that they said that while Sylvie is a loki, she different and had her own right as herself 😑😑😑.

I am sorry , did they just basically saying that she not loki at all and at same time basically saying that she's a female loki and being female is make her special?

Okey that definitely sexists. And worst of all her file saying 'laufeyson ', and not 'laufeydottir' . Wow speaking of not consistency and I have right to disappointed because mcu had images being detail and consistent things and them being not consistent in loki series is bad thing and ruined their images.

Just waiting mcu be worse

Sylvie is the Schrodinger Loki: When she does something wrong/evil it's because she is a Loki, but when she does something right/heroic it's because she's Sylvie and completely different to a Loki. When they speak of the so-called "self-love" in the series they claim she is a Loki just like him, but when it comes to discussing their romance she's not a Loki at all and she's her own person. If they talk about the murder of HWR, the chaos in the multiverse is Loki's doing but the free will of the people is thanks to Sylvie (see? the positive outcome is hers, the bad one is his).

The issue with Loki being genderfluid is that they wanted to have their cake and eat it too. They wanted the clout of news headlines praising them, critics mentioning their 'progressive agenda' and people on social media kissing their ass, but when it comes to customers and money they backpedalled so damn quickly because at the end of the day they only care about subscriptions, and Disney at its core is extremely traditional.

This is what we mean when we say that if this is the kind of "representation" we're going to get, we'd rather get none at all. It was nice hearing Loki confirm he's bisexual but the way they handled it? I'd rather he kept it to himself, to be honest.

They did change the Laufeyson in the series though, when Loki is going through the reports in ep2 her file says Laufeydottir. So hey, at least they learned something...

National Coming Out Day is here. While I’m very open about being bi, I’ve never quite been able to pin down my gender, or lack thereof, enough to talk about it. Well, really, it’s more like schrodinger’s gender. I often don’t think of it, I’ll refer to myself with whatever gendered terms sound right or funny to me at the time, and my answer can change multiple times within a day if you do force me to say something. Sometimes, forcing myself to give a label to it is uncomfortable. I suppose it’s fluid, like trying to catch running water with your bare hands. But even saying something is “fluid” feels too solid of a label. Would genderqueer fit better? Bigender? Plain ol’ NB? Ultimately, I think my childhood self had a better grasp on it when I said that I’m simply myself. Not a man, not a woman, just doctorghoti.

All that being said, happy Coming Out Day.

outing your gender by saying "goals" to too many things

“i’ve noticed that a lot of larries/harries are quick to pull the homophobic card as soon as someone expresses that the ws vid made them uncomfortable” So I guess the whole idea behind assigning queer identity to a music video directed by men, starring a man standing over women and filming their crotches covered with fruit was to weaponise that very same queer identity as a way to silence dissent and bypass criticism. Huh, very interesting...

Harry’s Schrodinger’s sexual identity (is he? isn’t he? and/or?) gives him a free pass to ... sell music exclusively about sexualizing women, I guess.

And yes, Harry has used his gender fluid, non declaration of sexual identity to objectify women and get away with it. He has implied that the album is about his ex-girlfriend Camille Rowe, and made an album about her sexuality, yet his fans defend it as somehow being about LGBT rights. The criticism about his misogyny is then framed as homophobia when Watermelon Sugar is from the viewpoint of a man, directed by a man, about women’s vaginas.

Schrodinger's Cat Is Non-Binary /Superposition

Schrodinger’s Cat Is Non-Binary /Superposition

Lmfao sorry Literally tho! People be like “Gender is a construct” Well, yes, but also Gender and sex are separate. Sex is immutable. If you take the principles And apply them too liberally You get a dead cat, eventually A gender identity That refuses to acknowledge its sex For what it is Still has a sex Even if it’s gender is fluid. If Caitlyn Jenner identities as A woman and…

View On WordPress

Do other gender fluid/bigendered people have schrodingers gender like me where I don’t know which gender I am until I think about it or are you always aware?

Haha when you don't know if you're being ~not straight~ or if you're just a decent human being and like hyping everyone up because society fucked up everyone's sense of gender norms and securities.

And its really fucking hard to figure this shit out when you've only had experiences with one gender and have no one around to help.

I mean:

Men in skirts and makeup. Yes

Women with swords in a suit. Yes

Enbies slaying in whatever. Yes

Gender fluid ppl killing in all of it. Yes

Like I know I like men but then I see a pretty person and my brain just goes

~oh fuck they are gorgeous...wait am I being gay or not? fuck idk~

Is schrodinger's closet a thing? I feel like it's a thing.

*sobs in bi(?)crisis*

And I'm like 53% sure if you press the right buttons I'll wanna kiss you but I.DONT.FUCKING.KNOW😭

Gender fluid? Non-binary?

I prefer the term "schrodingers pants"

Thnk you

A Romp on Masculinity

I'll make a few declarations at the onset of what I'm about to say. Masculinity is not a clearly defined word. What being masculine or being a man means in the States, is, qualitatively, light years away from what it means in everywhere else. In addition, rompers, as a fashion item worn by human beings that identify as male, is not new. Not by a long shot. Also, it's just clothing. On the sliding scale of dangerous, problematic, tsk-tsk worthy things that men take part in….I mean, damn, where do you start? And finally, I'm not trying to change minds. Trying to change a mind, is like an auto mechanic trying to fix a car over the phone. You can tell the mechanic what's wrong, what sounds the car is making, etc. But, unless someone gets under the hood manipulates wires, takes defective parts out, and replaces fluids, that car ain’t ever gonna run right. The response from men (and women) to men, wearing rompers is fascinating in its circuitous silliness. I almost can't get past the fact that the most effective title for the issue is, “men wearing rompers”, which sounds as Monty Python a skit as I could imagine. What’s bubbled up, is all manner of hateful, misogynistic, homophobic, ageist tweets and status updates. It’s astounding in its predictability. I've parsed through a number of opinions on the “men wearing rompers” controversy, and have seen women blasting men with the hot sands of misogyny. Where black people have Uncle Toms, I imagine the patriarchal equivalent for women, would be Auntie Tams. Being a willing participant, in furthering the chasm between men and women, in a society that's built on women as second class citizens, when you are a self-identified woman, is borderline lunacy. Even in as small an act, as regurgitating the bile men rocket at each other, in the efforts of creating binary gender roles and establishing dominance on societal playgrounds. I wonder if these women think it makes them more like men. If they, in the daze of subjugation, have convinced themselves that if you can't beat them, be them. Be just as simple, petty and fraudulent. Why fraud? We are mighty picky on when, where, how, why, and whom we allow to cross the lines. Prince, Bowie, Jimi, James, and Andre all dressed brazenly on the line. In suede and sequin and sheer. They are heroes. They are myths. They are immortal. They, also, are human, and man, and male, and musicians. Are the blouses, now, passè? Have leather jumpsuits been hijacked by gay and queer alike, and as such can only be associated with them? There lie, within this fallacy, a hypocrisy, as is usually the case. What I'm finding in these condemnations, stashed away behind the words, is fear. It's a marvelous thing, fear. When harmless affectations and dress styles, tear open the dread that your way of life is under attack. Your man code. Your gender roles and rules. Your generational identities. People don't so much as carry real disdain for these things, as they arm themselves with their terror for the misunderstood. For example, arachnophobes do not hate spiders. Definitively, phobias are irrational fears.  Arachnophobes fear spiders. They exclaim that they hate spiders in defense of their fear. What exacerbates, and, at times, is the impetus for this fear, is the misunderstanding that spiders cause death. When in fact, zoologically and factually speaking, very few spiders can even break skin, leave alone are venomous. Irrational fear disguised as common sense hate is an ideology that permeates throughout the fragile psyche of man in all arenas. Fearing the unknown seems like such a wasteful experience. Maybe there's a thrill I do not grasp. A kind of, Schrodinger’s cat appeal to the world. It feels exhausting. So rarely do the things we don't understand pose a real threat to our lives. Maybe we know the mundanity of life and need to create demons. Giving our lives purpose through a fictional dragon begging for a slaying. These perceived, if not delusional, devils, perennially create blockades for growth. There is nothing gained fighting a monster you manufactured. You set the limits of its power and the zest in its evil. You are unlikely to create a hurdle you can't leap in a single, unaffected bound. The real battle presented to you, is very often not around you. It's in you. It is not of your own creation. It is you Amusing as outrage, colored with machismo, over men wearing rompers may be, it's dangerously ignorant. Men in rompers or romper like outfits are old hat. A fashion trend going years back. Not far from overalls and jumpsuits. There is an current of misogyny just as strong as the current of homophobia. This idea of a “gay agenda” imposed on our youth. This is what tolerance looks like to those in small cages. Conspiracy. It should look like freedom.

Tag game

Tagged by @squeeworthy Name: David (shocking, I know) Nickname: Schrodingers human or head bitch Gender: fluid Star sign: scorpio Height: 5'5, possibly 5'6 Sexuality: bisexual Hogwarts House: https://youtu.be/0sB3Fjw3Uvc does this one count? Favorite color: blue Favorite animal: lynx or fox Current time: 8:51 Cats or dogs: kitties Favorite fictional character: Nick Wilde OR my fursona/oc Damien Number of blankets i sleep with: five, most of which are in a big clump that i spoon sometimes Favorite band: do i have to choose? The Smashing Pumpkins, Led zeppelin, System of a Down, Weezer, My Chemical Romance, and Rage Against the Machine (Smashing Pumpkins probably wins). I've also recently really gotten into Hum Dream trip: Long Beach or London Dream job: musician When my blog was created: April, 2014 When my blog hit its peak: apparently i've become popular enough in the zootopia fandom that someone i'm not mutuals with tagged me in a post last week, so theres that Why did you decide to make a tumblr: my friend @natobell told me i'd like it Why did i choose my url: a couple years ago i went to a camp called north bay and it was the most fun i'd ever had at a camp, so northbaydavid stuck I'm supposed to tag 20 people, but the only person i can really think of is @thebooksofeli

A Summary of My Orientation

Labels are a good tool to help you put a sense of meaning and validity to your feelings regarding identity. That being said what I am discussing is solely for the purposes of my own dissection of my own identity and my own personal benefit and those who find it interesting to get inside my head on this topic. 

I am Pansexual. I feel sexual attraction to people all across the gender spectrum. 

I am Homoflexible(?)- I hesitate to use this term considering I identify as non-binary. Objectively speaking I am more physically attracted to femme presenting people, though when it comes to emotional intimacy be it platonic or romantic I am really intimidated. 

I am Sapiosexual - Regardless of who you are we have to click on an intellectual level for the sex to be a thing. 

I am Polyamorous / Relationship Anarchist - I enter into and end relationships on my own without consulting a Primary or Anchor partner. I do not have any form of hierarchical categorization of long term partners. 

I am Quasi-romantic - Intense platonic connections and romantic attraction are virtually the same to me. I’m pretty much interested in most people until they say they just want to be friends and if they just want to be friends that’s cool. 

I am Non-Binary - I use gender queer and Non-binary pretty interchangeably. On rare occasions I’ll use gender fluid, but it’s not quite accurate. I’ll also joke about Schrodinger's gender in an attempt to help people understand that I’m Agender except when I’m not actively thinking about gender. Not that it’s a passive fluidity more that it doesn’t exist unless gender is on the brain which it generally won’t be unless brought up.

Thanks for listening. This will probably evolve.