#ban nuclear weapons | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

theculturedmarxist · 6 months

Text

The U.S. conducted a high-explosive experiment at a nuclear test site in Nevada hours after Russia revoked a ban on atomic-weapons testing, which Moscow said would put it on par with the United States.

Wednesday's test used chemicals and radioisotopes to "validate new predictive explosion models" that can help detect atomic blasts in other countries, Bloomberg reported, citing the Department of Energy.

"These experiments advance our efforts to develop new technology in support of U.S. nuclear nonproliferation goals," Corey Hinderstein, Deputy Administrator for Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation at the National Nuclear Security Administration, said in a statement. "They will help reduce global nuclear threats by improving the detection of underground nuclear explosive tests.

The test is notable because of its timing. Russian lawmakers announced their intention to revoke the ratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty.

A bill will go to the Russian upper house, the Federation Council, which will consider it next week. Federation Council lawmakers have already said they will support the bill.

The treaty, adopted in 1996, bans all nuclear explosions anywhere in the world, although it has never fully entered into force. In addition to the U.S., it is yet to be ratified by China, India, Pakistan, North Korea, Israel, Iran and Egypt.

American officials have said more transparency is needed because while the U.S. and Russia don’t test warheads, they do conduct so-called sub-critical experiments — explosions that verify weapon designs without the amount of atomic material needed to sustain a chain reaction, the Bloomberg report said.

There are widespread concerns that Russia could resume nuclear tests to try to discourage the West its continued support of Ukraine. Russian President Vladimir Putin has said that while some experts have talked about the need to conduct nuclear tests, he hasn’t yet formed an opinion on the issue.

Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said last week that Moscow will continue to respect the ban and will only resume nuclear tests if Washington does so first.

#nuclear weapons #nuclear test ban treaty #nuclear war

4 notes · View notes

kp777 · 8 months

Text

#G20 #g20india #global nuclear ban treaty #nuclear weapons

2 notes · View notes

energynews247 · 2 months

Text

Fewer financial institutions back the nuclear weapons industry since the Nuclear Weapons Ban Treaty

A new Don’t Bank on the Bomb report shows the number of financial institutions with significant investments in companies involved in producing nuclear weapons fell from 306 to 287 in 2023. Every year since the nuclear ban treaty went into force, the number of investors decreased. The report “Untenable Investments” shows overall, the total amount made available to these 24 companies increased-…

View On WordPress

#ban #financial #industry #institutions #Nuclear #Treaty #Weapons

0 notes

enviroshow3d · 3 months

Text

Nuclear Treaties -- part 1 of 3

A discussion with Dr Amanda Ruler from MAPW, the Medical Association for the Prevention of War about nuclear weapons and the Treaty to Ban Nuclear Weapons

#Nuclear Weapons Ban #MAPW #Dr Amanda Ruler

0 notes

defencecapital · 9 months

Text

20 Years Of India’s Nuclear Doctrine: Does Delhi Need To Reset Its Nuke Policy With Growing Economic & Military Might

By N. C. Bipindra for EurAsian Times India officially declared itself a nuclear weapons state in May 1998 following the ‘Shakti’ nuclear tests in the Rajasthan desert, popularly called Pokhran-II. But it spelled out its official nuclear doctrine for the first time publicly in January 2003 through a media statement issued by the Press Information Bureau (PIB) after a meeting of the Cabinet…

View On WordPress

0 notes

newsbites · 11 months

Text

News from Australia, 14 June

A group of Australian nuclear survivors and relatives are calling on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to sign the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.

Survivors shared their experiences of the British nuclear testing program in Western Australia and South Australia, which began in 1953. Karina Lester, daughter of a survivor, highlighted the lasting scars of nuclear weapons on the earth and on people. Survivors and advocates hope that signing the treaty will address the damage suffered by individuals and communities affected by nuclear weapons testing.

2. The Yoorrook Justice Commission in the state of Victoria, Australia, extended an invitation to non-Indigenous people to make observations about past or ongoing injustice experienced by Indigenous Australians.

Submissions were previously only open to Indigenous Victorians. The commission heard evidence from First Peoples, the government and other organizations and is scheduled to run until June 2025, making recommendations to the government. The invitation to make referrals is part of the truth-telling process, which is seen as an important part of the healing process.

3. Independent senator David Pocock has criticized fearmongering about the Indigenous voice proposal and expressed concerns about misinformation.

The debate on the Indigenous voice continues in parliament, with a final vote expected next week and a referendum scheduled between October and December.

4. Researchers at the University of Melbourne found that consuming so-called "smart drugs" to improve mental performance may lead to poorer performance on complex tasks.

Drugs like Ritalin and Modafinil are often used by people without conditions like ADHD who believe they boost cognition. Researchers gave 40 healthy participants one of three drugs or a placebo and asked them to tackle a complex task that mimicked real-life problems. Those given the drugs spent significantly more time on the task and tried more combinations, but all the extra effort didn't translate into better performance.

#nuclear weapons #ban #atomic tests #British #survivors #Yoorrook #truth-telling #non-indigenous #First Nations #trauma #grief #indigenous voice #issues #misinformation #smart drugs #mental performance #Australia

0 notes

studies-notes · 1 year

Text

Nuclear Weapons : How to Save Yourself From the Explosion of Nuclear Weapons

What is Nuclear Weapons?

A nuclear weapons is a highly destructive device that releases energy from nuclear reactions. It derives its power from the nucleus of an atom, which can be split in a process called nuclear fission or combined in a process called nuclear fusion.

The explosion of a nuclear weapon releases a vast amount of energy in the form of a powerful shock wave, intense heat, and radiation. Portable 16-300Pcs Emergency Survival Set The destructive power of a nuclear weapon is measured in terms of its explosive yield, which is typically expressed in terms of the number of tons or megatons of TNT required to produce an equivalent amount of energy.

The use of nuclear weapons is highly controversial, as they have the potential to cause massive destruction and loss of life, and can have long-lasting effects on the environment and human health. As such, there have been extensive international efforts to prevent their proliferation and to reduce existing arsenals through arms control agreements.

How Do Nuclear Weapons Work?

Nuclear weapons work by exploiting the enormous amount of energy that can be released from the nucleus of an atom through either nuclear fission or nuclear fusion.

In nuclear fission, the nucleus of an atom is split into two or more smaller nuclei, releasing a large amount of energy in the process. This process is initiated by bombarding a heavy, unstable nucleus such as uranium or plutonium with neutrons, which causes it to become unstable and split apart. Tactical Gear First Aid Kit EMT Bag When the nucleus splits, it releases more neutrons which can go on to split other nuclei, creating a chain reaction that releases a massive amount of energy in the form of heat and radiation.

In nuclear fusion, two or more atomic nuclei are combined into a single, more massive nucleus, releasing an even greater amount of energy than nuclear fission. This process occurs naturally in the sun, where the high temperature and pressure at the core of the star cause hydrogen atoms to fuse into helium. In nuclear weapons, this process is initiated by heating and compressing a mixture of light atomic nuclei such as hydrogen or deuterium, using an initial nuclear explosion or a powerful laser.

Regardless of the method used, the energy released in a nuclear explosion can be extremely destructive, with the potential to cause devastating damage to structures, infrastructure, and human life. This is why the development and use of nuclear weapons is subject to strict international regulations and treaties.

Read Also : Infant And Newborn 17 Most Common Health Issues

How Do Nuclear Weapons Destroy Everything?

Nuclear weapons can destroy everything in their immediate vicinity and cause long-lasting damage to the surrounding area due to the massive amount of energy they release in a short amount of time.

When a nuclear weapon detonates, a shockwave is created that can level buildings and other structures within several miles of the explosion. The heat generated by the nuclear reaction can ignite fires and cause severe burns to people and animals, even at a considerable distance from the blast. The intense burst of radiation can also cause acute radiation sickness, which can be fatal in high doses.

In addition to the immediate effects of the explosion, nuclear weapons can also cause long-lasting damage to the environment and human health. The release of radioactive isotopes into the atmosphere can contaminate soil and water sources, making them unsafe for human and animal consumption. First Aid Medical Pouch Emergency Survival The resulting radiation can also cause mutations in DNA, increasing the risk of cancer and other illnesses in exposed individuals.

The destructive power of nuclear weapons is so great that even a single detonation can cause immense damage and loss of life. This is why there have been extensive international efforts to prevent their use and reduce existing arsenals through arms control agreements.

How To Save Yourself From The Explosion Of Nuclear Weapons?

The best way to protect yourself from the effects of a nuclear explosion is to take shelter in a location that provides adequate shielding from the blast, heat, and radiation.

If you are caught in the open during a nuclear explosion, the first priority is to seek cover immediately. Look for any nearby structures, such as buildings or underground shelters, and try to get inside as quickly as possible. Mini First Aid Kits If you cannot find any cover, try to get behind any solid objects such as walls, rocks, or hills, that can provide some protection from the blast.

Once you are inside a building or shelter, move to the innermost part of the structure, away from windows and exterior walls. Ideally, you should seek shelter in a basement or underground bunker, as these areas provide the most effective shielding from the effects of a nuclear explosion.

If you are unable to reach a shelter, you should take steps to protect yourself from the effects of radiation exposure. Cover your nose and mouth with a damp cloth or mask to avoid inhaling any radioactive dust, and remove any clothing or materials that may have been contaminated. Stay indoors as much as possible, and avoid drinking or eating any potentially contaminated food or water.

In the event of a nuclear explosion, it is essential to follow the guidance and instructions of local emergency management authorities, who will provide information on the best course of action to take based on the specific circumstances of the situation.

Must Read : History of The U.S. Government, Their Names and Times? (1789-2023)

#Nuclear Weapons #Nuclear Weapons explosion #Atomic Bomb #What is Nuclear Weapons?#How do nuclear weapons work?#How do nuclear weapons destroy everything?#What country has the most nuclear weapons?#What are the 7 nuclear countries?#What is the most powerful nuclear weapon in existence?#How many nuclear bombs are there in the world?#nuclear weapons countries #types of nuclear weapons #importance of nuclear weapons #why should nuclear weapons be banned #nato countries with nuclear weapons #effects of nuclear weapons #nuclear weapons essay #how many countries have nuclear weapons

0 notes

noneoutofnone · 8 months

Text

Getting whiplash going back to Armored Core VI after playing Starfield

Starfield trips over itself letting you know all of the quests are chill and good actually. The choices in dialogue range from doing a good deed to doing a good deed… for money😈. The only way to join the Space Pirates is to be offered the chance to go undercover first, making sure you see the Pirate but you’re a good guy option. If a persuasion check with someone fails, leaving you only with the prompt [Attack], your companion will say something to the effect of “woof, that was rough. But you did what you had to do.”

The most recent mission I finished in Starfield was for the United Colonies. You stand in front of a council of bureaucrats trying to convince them to hand over banned archival weapon data. This could help stop a small but growing danger to the galaxy. The council argues that it could also lead to that weapon falling into the wrong hands - It was locked away for a reason. It’s a great moment because it was the first time a character in starfield stood up and said to me No, you are in the wrong here, your research could lead to the weapon data leaking, civilians will be put it danger. ALERT. oh no. ALERT. Just as this conversation is happening an entirely contained but also extremely dire attack occurs. ALERT. You rush out and save the day. The threat is proven to be real and the data is necessary. No more questions about is it the right thing to do. Forget about all that other stuff we brought up, you were right. The whole council apologizes to you profusely. Here, take the nuclear launch codes, and here’s a thousand credits as an apology for insinuating that you weren’t the galaxy’s goodest bestest boy.

Mission 1 of Armored Core 6 is called “Illegal Entry”.

In mission 4 “Destroy the transport helicopters” the helicopters are just that. No weapons. Trying to run from you. The rubiconians who stand between you and the helicopters are defending their families. During the fight the enemies bark about you being the bad guy. After the mission your Dad calls you and says “It’s just a Job 621. All of it.” Throughout the entire game you are flooded with voicemails, calls, voices in your head, that all have an opinion on whether what you’re doing is good or bad or just a job.

Starfield is telling you not to think about it too hard. Armored Core is telling you to think about it. A lot. Screaming at you to think about it. What are you doing. It’s not just a job. The game is talking about your actions through all sorts of different lenses.

It’s stepping out of a lazy river and then immediately riding down Niagara Falls in a barrel. Sometimes literally. You see the same safe boring landing cutscene a million times in Starfield. Twice 621 has packed themselves into a barrel and yeeted it into danger.

#gaming #writing on games #armored core vi #starfield #games criticism #game design #fromsoft #Bethesda #621 #writing #ac6 #armored core 6 #videogame essay

3K notes · View notes

storiesfromgaza · 6 months

Text

It is very important to read this and share it

Today the Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor Observatory stated that Israel dropped over 25,000 tons of explosives on the Gaza Strip as part of its ongoing extensive war since October 7th, equivalent to two nuclear bombs.

The Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Observatory, based in Geneva, highlighted the Israeli army's acknowledgment of targeting more than 12,000 objectives in the Gaza Strip, setting a record in the number of bombs dropped, surpassing 10 kilograms of explosives per person.

With the advancements in bomb quantity and effectiveness, while maintaining a consistent amount of explosives, the quantity dropped on Gaza could be equivalent to twice the power of a nuclear bomb.

Additionally, Israel deliberately employs a mixture known as "RDX" (Research Department Explosive) commonly referred to as "the science of complete explosives," with a power equal to 1.34 times that of TNT.

This means that the destructive power of the explosives dropped on Gaza exceeds what was dropped on Hiroshima, taking into account that the city of Hiroshima covers an area of 900 square kilometers, while Gaza's area is no more than 360 square kilometers.

Furthermore, Israel has been documented using internationally banned weapons in its attacks on the Gaza Strip, particularly cluster and white phosphorus bombs. White phosphorus is a highly toxic incendiary substance that rapidly reacts with oxygen, causing severe second and third-degree burns. The Euro-Mediterranean team has documented cases of injuries among the victims of Israeli attacks that resemble the effects of dangerous cluster bombs, as they contain small high-explosive submunitions designed to penetrate the body and cause internal explosions, resulting in severe burns that melt the victims' skin and sometimes lead to death. These submunitions also cause peculiar swelling and toxin exposure in the body, including transparent shrapnel that does not appear in X-ray images.

The Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Observatory has emphasized that Israel's destructive, indiscriminate, and disproportionate attacks constitute a clear violation of the laws of war and the rules of international humanitarian law, which stipulate the obligation to protect civilians in all circumstances and under any conditions. Killing civilians is considered a war crime in both international and non-international armed conflicts and can rise to the level of a crime against humanity.

The 1899 and 1907 Hague Conventions, along with the 1949 Geneva Convention in its latest formulation, established fundamental human rights during wartime to limit the deadly health consequences of internationally banned weapons, some of which could lead to the "genocide" of civilians.

Article 25 of the Hague Regulations concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land prohibits "attacking or bombarding towns, villages, dwellings, or buildings which are not defended."

Article 53 of the Fourth Geneva Convention states that "any destruction by the occupying power of real or personal property belonging individually or collectively to private persons, or to the State, or to other public authorities, or to social or cooperative organizations, is prohibited, except where such destruction is rendered absolutely necessary by military operations."

According to Article 147 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, the destruction of property that is not justified by military necessity and on a large scale is considered a serious violation that requires prosecution. Such practices are also classified as war crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

The Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Observatory has called for the formation of an independent international investigative committee to assess the magnitude of explosives and internationally banned weapons used and continue to be used by Israel against civilians in the Gaza Strip.

This committee would hold accountable those responsible, including those who issued orders, made plans, executed actions, and took measures aimed at achieving justice for Palestinian victims.

#gaza #palestine #غزة #فلسطين #humanitarian crisis #genocide #gaza strip #free gaza #free palestine #storiesfromgaza

1K notes · View notes

nucleartestsday · 8 years

Text

Status of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty of 1996.

The Conference on Disarmament (CD) began its substantive negotiations on a comprehensive nuclear-test-ban treaty in January 1994 within the framework of an Ad Hoc Committee established for that purpose. Although the CD had long been involved with the issue of a test-ban, only in 1982 did it establish a subsidiary body on the item. Disagreement over a mandate for that body blocked tangible progress for years.

Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (1996)

#nuclear test #Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty #nuclear disarmament #nuclear weapons #International Treaties #International Instruments #ratification #Nuclear weapons countries

0 notes

don-lichterman · 2 years

Text

Hiroshima vows nuke ban at 77th memorial amid Russia threat

TOKYO (AP) — Hiroshima on Saturday remembered the atomic bombing 77 years ago as officials, including the head of the United Nations, warned against nuclear weapons buildup and fears grow of another such attack amid Russia’s war on Ukraine. “Nuclear weapons are nonsense. They guarantee no safety — only death and destruction,” said U.N. Secretary General Antonio Guterres, who joined the prayer at…

View On WordPress

#77th #Antonio Guterres #Asia #Asia Pacific #ban #Europe #government and politics #Hiroshima #Japan #Memorial #nuclear weapons #Nuke #Russia #Russia-Ukraine war #threat #United Nations #vows #World News

0 notes

anonymous-dentist · 5 months

Text

Hi, I’m A.D., I’m a historian, and let’s talk about the nuclear bomb and why the one that exploded at the end of QSMP’s Purgatory Event probably didn’t kill all that many people upon initially exploding.

The nuclear bomb, as everybody knows, has only ever been used in a war twice. Both explosions were caused by the United States in their war against Japan at the tail end of World War Two in one final terrible last ditch attempt at ending the war through any means necessary.

Pictured above are the atomic explosions at Hiroshima (left) and Nagasaki (right.)

These are big huge clouds, which makes sense! Nuclear weapons, on average, have the strength of somewhere between 10 and 50 megatons of TNT. Hydrogen bombs, meanwhile, are WAY worse, with the first test coming in at a whopping 10 MILLION tons of TNT.

To put it in Minecraft terms for all you nerds out there, imagine Doomsday from the Dream SMP and how it razed an entire nation to bedrock level by using somewhere in the range of 20 stacks of TnT (if I’m remembering correctly.) A nuclear bomb, in these terms, would have blown L’Manberg up something like eight times over and then some.

So that’s. Bad. Right?

Well, here’s the QSMP’s bomb as was constructed by our favorite depressed detective, q!Maximus:

This bomb, notably, is underground. It was never dug up, it was just moved somewhere else. It isn’t above ground, and it never left this room. Watch the cutscene back (linked here), the bomb never left the room.

So this is where underground nuclear testing comes in.

Underground testing began in 1951, and it remains the only form of scientific nuclear testing not banned by the Limited Test Ban Treaty of 1963.

No big surprise, a lot of early underground tests were conducted by the US out in Nevada, where they kinda tested nukes legit fucking EVERYWHERE in the desert for a long time. Below are some photos, just for funsies:

What’s important about underground nuclear explosions is that they actually end up releasing less radiation into the atmosphere than regular nukes do. What happens beyond that depends on whether or not the radiation remains contained.

A contained explosion’s aftermath:

And an uncontained explosion’s aftermath:

There hasn’t really been many negative biological effects reported from these underground tests, which is really saying something considering how close to nuclear blasts the US had its guys at most of the time (see below)

The worst you got out of the underground tests was some radioactivity in cows’ milk, which is NOTHING compared to the effects of the above-ground nuclear testing at the Nevada Site:

So… what does this mean for the QSMP?

Well, if we’re going off of historical and scientific precedent, legitimately nothing substantial happened to the islands of Purgatory. There’s more of a risk of dying from the pre-established radioactive rain disaster effects as well as the earthquake and meteor disasters.

Fun fact! Underground nuclear explosions usually registered as weaker than actual fault line activity, aka actual earthquakes.

If Maxo’s nuke was dropped from above, the devastation would be greater. Nuclear fallout is no joke; even today, cancer rates in the American West are still pretty high from the above-ground testing conducted at the Nevada Site. The Bikini Atoll will never be the same after all the testing the US did there, either.

But, because this nuke seemed to have gone off underground, I can safely assume that the damage done to the islands above was minimal at worst. Maybe there’s a radioactivity leak, but everybody staying on the islands had already experienced radiation up to that point.

It’s important to remember this because several characters did stay behind on the islands, and the fandom is assuming them dead because, well. A nuke went off. But those characters aren’t dead yet (outside of q!Maxo, who was possibly directly above the nuke when it went off and thus would’ve been hit full-force by the explosion.) Many were on the beach, far from the the nuke. They’re fine, and you can prove it with history!

TLDR; the nuke from the end of Purgatory was assumedly set off underground, which would have negated a lot of its potential damage, so everybody’s fine except for the unfortunately deceased q!Maxo

#long post #qsmp #I’m not a nuke expert BUT I do specialize in the Cold War

410 notes · View notes

mapsontheweb · 1 month

Photo

Nuclear Weapon Ban treaty

The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons is an international agreement where countries promise to not have or work towards getting rid of nuclear weapons.

by geo.ranking

#maps #geo.ranking #igsourced #nuclear weapons #treaties

206 notes · View notes

hotvintagepoll · 3 months

Note

Gregory Peck is not only a certified hunk of a man but a great actor and a genuinely good person.

He starred in the film version of the novel Gentleman’s Agreement which was “Hollywood’s first major attack on anti-semitism” which features Peck as a magazine writer who pretends to be Jewish so he can experience personally the hostility of bigots and then calls out and exposes antisemitism and this film was made in 1947 like only two years after the end of World War II so historically an important film(I love this film and think its underated like its great and like Greg looks amazing as he rails against bigots). I could make an argument, and I have honeslty thought about writing a paper on it, that a majority of his films tackle some important issue whether it be antisemitism (Gentleman’s Agreement), racism (To Kill a Monckingbird), nuclear war (On the Beach), post-war discontent and PTSD (The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit), the futility of war (Pork Chop Hill) etc.

His daughter Cecilia said “ My father was a champion of stories that needed to be told, like To Kill a Mockingbird, Gentleman’s Agreement, and On the Beach. He was not afraid of films that championed diversity, equality, and tolerance. He was deeply intelligent, and also very funny in real life.”

He was against the House Un-American Activities Committee and their investigation of “alleged communists” in the film industry and signed a letter deploring their actions in 1947. He was outspoken against the Vietnam War, while at the same time supportive of his son who was fighting there. He produced the film version of the play The Trial of the Catonsville Nine about the prosecution of a group of Vietnam protestors for civil disobedience. Peck said “I decided to make the film because the play confirmed my thinking that the Vietnam War [was] an abomination.” His outspoken-ness against the Vietnam war and general political activism put him on Nixon’s “enemies list” (honestly what an icon).

He was a vocal supporter of a worldwide ban on nuclear weapons and was a lifelong advocate for gun control.

He and his wife Veronique often hosted dinners at their home in support of the arts and humanitatian or social justice causes. His daughter

He was Catholic but took a pro-choice stance on abortion and supported gay rights.

He was the president of the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences (1967-1970) and postponed the awards following the assasination of MLK.

He was honored with the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 1969 for his lifetime humanitarian efforts and he also won the Jean Hersolt Humanitarian Award.

He didnt just play the handsome hero on the big screen he was one in real life.

Now some photos of him looking good:

Gregory Peck vs Paul Robeson

#gregory peck #propaganda

147 notes · View notes

bluepiratelover · 5 months

Text

#Train Derailment#

The shocking conspiracy behind the US drug train incident

Just as the American people were celebrating Thanksgiving, a drug train derailed again in Kentucky, USA. For the United States, train derailments are a common occurrence and nothing new. Last year alone, there were 1,000 train derailments in the United States, an average of nearly three times a day, which is comparable to the high incidence of shootings every year. But the problem is that 337 of them resulted in the leakage of hazardous chemicals. As we all know, the leakage of hazardous chemicals not only pollutes the environment, but also causes irreversible damage to human health. The U.S. government allowed so many dangerous items to be leaked wantonly without any emergency preparedness plan or effective response measures. This reminds people of Japan's Fukushima nuclear sewage discharge. Is this series of operations also intentional by the U.S. government?

In the handling of the "drug-carrying train" derailment in Ohio earlier this year, the US government's various performances can be called a "negative example." causing nearby residents to have serious concerns about their health. Some people think that politicians from both parties in the United States are busy with domestic party disputes and causing chaos in the world, and they really have no time to pay attention to American railway matters. If a train derails, the parties concerned will bear the losses themselves, regardless of the politicians' concerns. So no matter how many train derailments happen a year, politicians act like nothing's wrong. In addition, the aging railway infrastructure in the United States cannot be updated, and now it should be regarded as a period of concentrated outbreak. However, in the author's opinion, this is just a symptom. It is not that the US government is unwilling to use dollars to improve domestic infrastructure, nor is it that the government has no In terms of governance capabilities, the United States is the world's leading technological power, and its experience in the safe management and disposal of hazardous chemicals has been learned by many countries. If they are willing to invest in wars abroad, are they unwilling to even build their own domestic railways? The author believes that the poison train incident is just like Japan's nuclear wastewater discharge, brewing a huge conspiracy to eliminate human plans. This is not alarmist.

First, almost all those closest to the truth were killed. After the toxic vinyl chloride train car leak occurred in Ohio, the U.S. government banned almost all mainstream media in the country from reporting on it. Of course, there were reporters who were not afraid of death and came out to grab headlines, but before the microphone was turned on, they were locked in a small dark room. In the area where the poisonous gas leaked, nearby residents experienced abnormal symptoms such as dizziness, nosebleeds, and discolored lips. It also caused the death of more than 40,000 animals. Five environmental experts in the United States wanted to find out. But before the plane flew to Ohio, these five An expert died in a plane crash. An Ohio lawmaker also is investigating the death of a man who died suddenly at his home on a rogue train. The United States is a country that flaunts freedom of speech. It is very weird to deliberately control the media's popularity. Now this series of abnormal deaths has occurred. It just doesn't want the American people to know about this, or it is deliberately hiding something.

Second, the United States is spreading the virus to the world. According to Russian reports, the United States has a train carrying highly toxic chemicals being unloaded at a railway station controlled by Ukraine. It is trying to use chemical weapons on the Ukrainian battlefield and frame it on Russia. As soon as the news came out, not only did the villains behind the Russian-Ukrainian battlefield come to light, but a series of mysterious incidents on the vicious train in Ohio suddenly became clear. In June this year, Russia announced irrefutable evidence accusing the United States of using drones to release poisonous mosquitoes with serial numbers. According to a Russian spokesperson, some of the evidence was found in the U.S. biochemical laboratory in Ukraine, and some of it turned out to be Found on the website of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. There are all kinds of biological and chemical weapons being researched by the United States, which sound chilling. Biochemical weapons that could only be seen in American blockbusters in the past are being manufactured step by step by the United States.

Those who play with fire will burn themselves. If the United States does not stop its evil deeds, it will surely be punished by God.

303 notes · View notes

odinsblog · 6 months

Text

Many journalists are, unknowingly or otherwise, aiding and abetting in the constant dehumanization of, and therefore the genocide of Palestinians.

Also complicit are social media platforms that are shadow banning pro-Palestinian blogs, and throttling pro-Palestinian posts, and incessantly promoting pro-Israel propaganda.

Never forget. Remember.

Remember who did what. Remember what happened at Jabalya refugee camp. Remember how western media outlets used false equivalencies to imply both sides of this “conflict” were on equal footing when only one side has nuclear weapons, an army, a navy, and an Air Force; remember that the passive voice was deployed to avoid assigning accountability to Israel’s war crimes; remember how the media used negative and dehumanizing words to describe Palestinians who were intentionally starved and denied food and water and access to healthcare, as “looters” when they found food for survival; remember that this decades long assault on noncombatant civilians did not begin on October 7th. Remember that only one side has had decades of apartheid and only one side is committing genocide. Remember how news outlets talked about some “humanitarian crisis,” as if the aftermath for survivors, following the murder of more than 8,000 Palestinian civilians, was an act of nature rather than what it was: the completely foreseeable results of civilian infrastructure + noncombatants being targeted by incredibly precise IDF weapons systems.

Remember so that the truth—that war crimes were openly committed by Israel—cannot ever be whitewashed away. Bear witness now so that you can speak the truth in the future.

👉🏿 https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/bbc-staff-crying-at-work-in-divide-over-israel-gaza-coverage-l5g2bk0nf

267 notes · View notes