Tumgik
#United Nations
sayruq · 7 hours
Text
The U.S. will use its veto power against a Palestinian bid to be recognized as a member state of the United Nations during a vote at the Security Council expected to take place Thursday evening. Vedant Patel, principal deputy spokesperson for the State Department, described as premature an effort by the Palestinian Authority (PA) to gain member status at the U.N. He said there was not unanimity among the Security Council’s 15 members that the Palestinian Authority had met the criteria for membership, with unresolved questions over the governance of the Gaza Strip, where Israel is in a war to defeat and eliminate the controlling power, Hamas. “And for that reason, the United States is voting no on this proposed Security Council resolution,” Patel said.
Earlier it was revealed that the United States was secretly pressuring other members of the Security Council to shoot down a Palestinian state membership so the US wouldn't have to use its veto as that would lead to a wave of local and international criticism for Joe Biden.
5K notes · View notes
troythecatfish · 9 hours
Text
Tumblr media
Washington is exerting pressure on different countries to reject a vote for Palestinian statehood expected to be held today at the United Nations.
Cartoon: Branco
152 notes · View notes
social-battery-low · 5 hours
Text
Palestinians bidding for full UN membership is happening right now. The fact that they even have to do this is unbelievably sad. I'm crying and can barely watch. I don't even want yo LOOK at the Israeli rep. This us 2024, guys. 2024 and people in the world STILL have to do this.
121 notes · View notes
workersolidarity · 2 hours
Text
Tumblr media
🇺🇸⚔️🇵🇸 🚨
UNITED STATES VETOS PALESTINIAN MEMBERSHIP TO THE UNITED NATIONS
In a vote today in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) on a resolution to grant membership into the UN for Palestine was vetoed by the United States.
The vote for Palestinian membership was supported by the vast majority of UNSC members, with 12 votes in favor, one against, and two abstentions.
US representative to the UN for Special Political Affairs, Robert Wood, argued that Palestine could not be admitted as long as Hamas controlled the Gaza Strip, echoing Zionist arguments over Palestine's membership, at one point arguing, “there are unresolved questions as to whether [Palestine] meets the criteria to be considered a state," without ever mentioning the Israeli occupation that makes such criteria unlikely to ever be satisfied.
Palestine is currently a "Permanent Observer State" without voting rights at the United Nations.
#source
@WorkerSolidarityNews
73 notes · View notes
totallynotcensorship · 18 hours
Text
Tumblr media
tags update: israel is fifth on the front page
DON'T STOP TALKING ABOUT PALESTINE
109 notes · View notes
Text
EDITH M. LEDERER at AP, via NewsNation:
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The United States vetoed a widely backed U.N. resolution on Thursday that would have paved the way for full United Nations membership for the state of Palestine. The vote in the 15-member Security Council was 12 in favor, the United States opposed and two abstentions. The resolution would have recommended that the 193-member General Assembly, where there are no vetoes, approve Palestine becoming the 194th member of the United Nations. Some 140 countries have already recognized the state of Palestine, so its admission would have been approved. This is the second Palestinian attempt to become a full member of the United Nations, and it comes as the war in Gaza, now in its seventh month, has put the more than 75-year-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict at center stage. Before the vote, U.S. deputy State Department spokesman Vedant Patel said the United States has “been very clear consistently that premature actions in New York — even with the best intentions — will not achieve statehood for the Palestinian people.” Palestinian membership “needs to be the outcome of the negotiation between Israel and the Palestinians,” U.S. deputy ambassador Robert Wood said. It “is something that would flow from the result of those negotiations.” Anything that gets in the way “makes it more difficult to have those negotiations” and doesn’t help move toward a two-state solution where Israel and Palestine live side by side in peace, which “we all want,” Wood told reporters. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas first delivered the Palestinian Authority’s application for U.N. membership to then-Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon in 2011. That initial bid failed because the Palestinians didn’t get the required minimum support of nine of the Security Council’s 15 members. The Palestinians then went to the General Assembly and by more than a two-thirds majority succeeded in having their status raised from a U.N. observer to a non-member observer state in November 2012. That opened the door for the Palestinian territories to join U.N. and other international organizations, including the International Criminal Court. The Palestinians revived their bid for U.N. membership in early April, backed by the 140 countries that have recognized Palestine as an independent state.
This is such a disgraceful decision by the Biden Administration vetoing making the State of Palestine a full UN member.
17 notes · View notes
bloghrexach · 4 hours
Text
Tumblr media
🇺🇳 … there was a vote today at the UN!! The vote was to change Palestine’s ‘observer’ status to ‘full membership’.
These are the results!! — Once again, the USA uses its VETO vote. Two other nations abstained (a veto in my view).
Can anyone explain why? Please? … 🇺🇳
@hrexach …
16 notes · View notes
scarz-xo · 4 hours
Text
Veto Power in the UN: is the power of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) to veto any "substantive" resolution.
Tumblr media
Veto: an official power or right to refuse to accept or allow something.
Now the question is who holds that much power and right? And most importantly do they deserve those privileges?
China
France
Russia
UK
USA
Now let's dig deeper in China 🇨🇳:
Here's the most recent crime that for some reason nobody talks about (It's not "some reason" but they're Muslims so terrorists by default, huh?) :
Next we have France 🇫🇷:
One of the things I'll never forget is my Algerian coworker who told us about how some of her family members losing their lives in traumatising ways to those who lived to remember.
Next we have Russia 🇷🇺:
What I find funny is the "could be" in the headline cause the pictures in Kiev and the mass graves should be enough proof that it is an actual crime.
Next is the UK 🇬🇧:
And finally USA 🇺🇸:
And the list goes on,we can go through it not for days but for decades, going around each of the 5 countries histories to discover atrocities some made individually and some made with a bunch of them gathering together and of course that results in many inhumane Vetoes because how can we depend on those who hurt us, who hurt humanity throughout history to hold that much power? To have that right?
Veto is not outdated, it should have never been created.
19 notes · View notes
nezreblogz · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
91K notes · View notes
witchywitchy · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
Keep talking about Palestine!
68K notes · View notes
longlivepalestina · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
israel is a settler colony.
39K notes · View notes
moonlayl · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
From the court today. Israel IS committing a genocide.
26K notes · View notes
sayruq · 16 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
19K notes · View notes
mysharona1987 · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
You’d think this would be a bigger story, tbh.
25K notes · View notes
nezreblogz · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
61K notes · View notes
witchywitchy · 3 months
Text
"B-but Palestinians can get their freedom with peace not violence 🥺🥺" no. Screw your feelings. The armed resistance against colonizers and murderers is what will give Palestinians their freedom and what will eventually achieve real peace.
An enemy that bombs and uses white phosphorus against civilians doesn't know nor practice what your broken moral compass describes as "peace". Freedom was proven throughout history not to be achieved through kneeling and asking the oppressor to kindly stop. Freedom needs to be taken by force. Your little Utopian way of thinking doesn't work in the real world. Your feelings don't matter because you're not the one living under occupation. Your feelings don't matter because you're not one of the thousands of children who lost their limbs. You're not one of the children who became orphans due to this genocide. You're not the mother who lost her child to the carpet bombing. You're not the father carrying the remains of your child in plastic bags. You're not the newlywed woman who lost her husband. You're not the one at risk of either getting killed any second or losing your loved ones in the blink of an eye!
"Peace" is not really a thing you see during a live ethnic cleansing!
46K notes · View notes