#alexander boris de pfeffel johnson
Text
#UK politics#covid inquiry#boris johnson#alexander boris de pfeffel johnson#boris is a fucking moron
52 notes
·
View notes
Text
12 notes
·
View notes
Text
Here’s something that can’t be explained by The Thick of It because they probably didn’t think this sort of thing could or would happen
Johnson tried to give Carrie top Foreign Office job during affair
Simon Walters
Boris Johnson tried to appoint his future wife as his chief of staff at the Foreign Office but was blocked by colleagues after they discovered their affair, The Times can disclose.
Johnson, who was foreign secretary from July 2016 to July 2018, wanted to install Carrie Symonds to the position on a salary of at least £100,000 but allies intervened, fearing it would be a flagrant abuse of ethics. “It would have left him dangerously exposed,” an ally who was involved in the veto said.
Staff learnt of the affair after an MP allegedly walked in on the pair in a “compromising situation” in Johnson’s Commons office in early 2018.
The couple were first photographed together in public at the Conservative Party Black and White hall in February 2018. In September 2018, it was announced that Johnson and his wife Marina Wheeler QC were divorcing after 25 years of marriage. The next day reports emerged linking him with Shmonds. The couple confirmed their relationship in the weeks that followed. They married in 2021 and have two children.
The ally claimed that appointing Symonds chief of staff would have been a “far bigger scandal” than Matt Hancock, as health secretary, having an affair with Gina Coladangelo, an aide, their relationship was revealed a year ago after video emerged of them kissing in Hancock’s Whitehall office during lockdown. Both resigned.
“The chief of staff position carried a minimum £100,000 salary and the Foreign Office is a much more sensitive department,” the source said. The role would have been taxpayer funded.
Three of Johnson’s sites, including Ben Gascoigne, now one of his deputy chiefs of staff and a friend of Wheeler, threatened to resign over the proposed appointment.
The disclosures follow a Times investigation into claims in a biography of the Pine minister’s wife by the former Conservative treasurer and deputy chairman Lord Ashcroft, the book, First Lady, says that a Tory MP “walked in abruptly” on Johnson “in a compromising situation” with Symonds, who was then the Conservative Party’s head of communications. The book says that the MP told one of Johnson’s closest allies and they told two members of the Foreign Office staff. As a result, Johnson’s staff thwarted his attempt to promote Symonds, it says. Ashcroft I stands by his account. The Johnsons have not taken legal action over the book.
The Times has identified and contacted four allies of Johnson who know of the matter. Three, two of whom were given senior ministerial jobs when Johnson became prime minister in 2019, spoke in return for anonymity.
One said: “An illicit relationship with Carrie was none of our business: making her chief of staff was definitely our business. Our job was to protect him. He kept saying she would be great in the job. We knew what was going on between then and that it was an insane risk to let him do it.”
A second ally said: “Most of us thought she wasn’t the right person because she was relatively inexperienced.”
The unnamed MP denied having “walked in on them in a compromising situation” but said that Ashcroft’s version was “20 per cent right.”
The ministerial code, updated by Johnson, 57, last month states that “working relationships with civil servants, colleagues and staff should be proper and appropriate”. No 10, Mrs Johnson, 34, and Gascoigne declined to comment.
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
Did you know that Boris Johnson is actually called Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson, Born a US citizen in New York City and wrote fan fiction about himself called 72 virgins where a "Hapless, bicycle-riding, touseled-Haired MP" fights off terrorists that plan on assassinating the US president all to divert attention away from a financial debacle involving a lingerie shop... And that whole segment of the book including the lingerie shop's name 'Eulalie' was straight up plagiarised from Wodehouse's The Code of the Woosters
#Boris Johnson#uk politics#UK#Prime Minister#alexander boris de pfeffel johnson#Literally the shit you find out on Wikipedia
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Congratulations to all my UK faves, hope the Conservatives deflate like a soufflé tossed into snow
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
Unedited blog #1
I'll post these as I go. I may skim back over before sending but certainly there's no drafts, redrafts, proofreads, etc. Do forgive me for any incorrect information, I will try and keep this mainly as opinion pieces. As always, feedback of any regard is welcome.
Thoughts on July 7th 2022.
What a momentous day. I say momentous, yet it will probably just stay as such with no real change in the History books. No great cultural revolution is on the horizon. The great Prime Minister of our era, Boris Johnson has resigned as leader of the Tories and in due course as Prime Minister. I say great in the sense that he conned most of you into voting for his neoliberalist, vaguely xenophobic sham policies. If you voted Tory in 2019, shame on you. Johnson going won't change anything. Another toff with no connection to reality will take his steed. The tories have been getting away with a myriad or abhorrent policies and decisions for over a decade now. You know the worst thing about it? We have allowed it to happen. I don't even blame the tories for being who they are. It's in their nature. Arseholes will act like arseholes. It's class traitors, working class 'tories', who pulled their pants down to reveal to the aforementioned arseholes their power outlet (forgive the shocking analogy). Those more sound of mind begged and begged them not to vote for Johnson. Not to vote for Brexit. Look where we are now.
If you are offended by these words, that's called guilt. Shame on you. Don't take it too personally though, this comes from an angry man, venting on a social media platform, on a bus. This means nothing in the grand scheme of things. What does matter is a more reasoned approach the next General Election. Vote for a positive future. Not a non-vote for a Corbyn without considering conventional logic. Learn from your mistakes.
God help the future generations. I spent my youth blaming the generation above me for the state of the world. Now the youth blame us for the state of today. The fucking cyclical nature of the universe.
#uk politics#blog post#tories#alexander boris de pfeffel johnson#thursday#spilled thoughts#parliament
3 notes
·
View notes
Photo
It had to be done.
[ID: An image from the Superhell confession episode of Supernatural. Castiel saying ‘I want you to join my cabinet’ and Dean Winchester saying ‘I Quit’
#UK politics#boris johnson#alexander boris de pfeffel johnson#politics#uk government#cabinet resignation#seriously what the fuck happened
1 note
·
View note
Text
Ministers have been accused of writing a “blank cheque” for Boris Johnson’s legal bills, as it emerged taxpayer-funded support was being extended to help defend him against claims he misled parliament over Partygate.
Chris Bryant, a Labour MP and chair of the standards committee, suggested Johnson could afford to pay his own legal bills and highlighted the money the former prime minister has made since leaving office, including a speech for which he charged £276,130.
“The government seems to have issued a blank cheque to Boris Johnson at a time when public finances are meant to be tight,” Bryant said. “Frankly, Boris Johnson can afford his own legal representation.”
0 notes
Text
Hey just to let you all know
Just to let you know
#guillotine#shopping#i need to kow where that tab goes now#ill come back later ig#may buy one#youll know if i do#Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson will know if i purchase one certainly#sidenote:ecosia#ecosia#good search engine#my best posts
11 notes
·
View notes
Text
Tory MPs of the last 7 years
Name: David Cameron
Won the general election because: His opponant ate a sandwich kinda funny
Best known for: Fucking a dead pig
Left office because: He only called for a Brexit referendum because he was weirdly confident Remain would win, and had absolutely no plan on what to do if Leave won. Saw the shitstorm on the horizon and did not want to preside over it. Resigned in disgrace.
Name: Teresa May
Won the (snap) general election because: Labour wasn’t racist enough about Brexit/she simply refused to leave when she lost her majority and instead ghosted the Queen until she’d found a few non-Tory MPs willing to back her in return for bribes. Was PM BEFORE the snap election based on Tory party leadership votes.
Best known for: Almost restarting the Troubles in Ireland and doing the world’s most awkward dance to ABBA.
Left office because: The EU wouldn’t accept any of her Brexit deals, and parliament wouldn’t sign off on her agreeing to the terms the EU set. Resigned in disgrace.
Name: Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson
Won the (snap) general election because: Labour wasn’t racist enough about Brexit/WTF knows, the British public are apparently easy for Eaton boys who can’t get a sentence out without two racist remarks and ten weird sounds that aren’t actually words. Was PM BEFORE the snap election based on Tory party leadership votes.
Best known for: Hoh boy. Where to start? Breaking laws he literally introduced to the public during lockdown and then saying he broke them because he “didn’t understand them” is probably the standout. Also looking like a teddy bear possessed by horny racist on purpose.
Left office because: See above. Also nepotism. Resigned in disgrace after clinging on as long as he possibly could.
Name: Liz Truss
Won the general election because: Not applicable. There was no election. She won the Tory party leadership vote because her main opponent was a brown Hindu.
Best known for: The Queen dying. Somehow being even more incompetent than Boris Johnson.
Left office because: Her own party of corrupt, hard-right capitalists thought her plans to lift caps on banker bonuses and refusal to tax energy companies or place long-term price caps in the middle of a cost of living crisis were extremely bad. Also no one actually liked her in the first place. Resigned in disgrace.
#UK politics#boris johnson#liz truss#next up:#either de Pfeffel Johnson again somehow (genuine possibility)#or Jeremy Hunt: the man best known for fucking over the NHS turning up to parliament off his face on drugs and then disappearing for months#supposedly the brown Hindu Rishi Sunak is also a possibility but again he is brown and Hindu and Tory party members are extremely racist
45 notes
·
View notes
Photo
#UK politics#boris johnson#alexander boris de pfeffel johnson#partygate#the saga continues#boris is incapable of telling the truth#perjury#fuck boris
97 notes
·
View notes
Audio
I don’t know why this blew my mind so much, but it did. I knew the thing about his middle name being “de Pfeffel”, but not that Boris Johnson’s first name isn’t even Boris. That’s just such a weird thing for me to not know, given the amount I have heard about this guy for years and years. Did everyone else know this? Am I the only one who didn’t?
When I heard Andrew Maxwell explain this, I immediately thought that can’t be true, so I Googled it, and what comes up right now if you Google Boris Johnson is a pretty depressing look at the state of the British nation at the moment:
His name is Alexander. He chose to go by “Boris”. That was his choice for a life in politics. Like how the Canadian representative on the IOC could have chosen to be publicly known as Richard Pound or Rick Pound or Rich Pound or Ricky Pound but for some reason he chose to go by Dick. Why?
I recently learned the Johnny Vegas isn’t just a stage name for Michael Pennington, like how Lee Mack is a stage name for Lee McKillop because Lee prefers to work under a slightly different name from his real one. Michael Pennington says he created a character named Johnny Vegas - everything I’ve seen Johnny Vegas do has been officially done by a character being played by Michael Pennington. I knew before about Michael being his real name, but only recently learned that he considers Vegas to be a character and not a stage name, and that blew my mind about as much as learning that Boris Johnson is “Al” in real life. It’s all theatre. It’s genuinely all theatre. And, you know, that’s fine when you’re doing shouty Northern accent comedy on panel shows. Less fine when you’re running a country.
I feel like a character in a 90s movie that just took a bunch of unspecified drugs and had an epiphany about seeing the world clearly. Johnny Vegas doesn’t exist, man. Michael Pennington made him up. And this whole thing, it’s just been a rich guy named Al messing with everyone. He probably came up with the whole thing in university and laughed about it. Just Oxbridge kids creating characters; on one side of campus the shit they invent becomes Footlights shows and 500 metres away they’re inventing future Prime Ministers (I think Alexander de Pfeffel was actually Oxford, but whatever, it doesn’t matter because nothing is real). I need to drink some water.
43 notes
·
View notes
Text
Anonymous asked: What are your thoughts on Rishi Sunak as PM after all the psycho-drama of Boris Johnson and Liz Truss? Is he too rich for Britain’s blood? Are the Tories finished?
It is a ‘psycho-drama’ as you correctly summarised the last seven weeks, where our country is now on its third Prime Minister. I was talking to my eldest sister on the phone back in England and we both realised that one of her children has already lived through three prime ministers, four chancellors and two monarchs. She is only one years old.
Britain is a punch bag at the moment. My work colleagues - drawn from other nationalities - are having a good laugh at our expense but what’s worse is when French friends who go from laughing at us to actually putting a consoling arm around your shoulder out of sincere pity, then you know you’ve hit rock bottom.
I don’t know about you but I am exhausted. Boring is best. We could all do with some ‘boring’ government. We need calmness and solidity, and above all, no-drama. Irrespective of our political beliefs, one should wish Rushi Sunak the best and I hope he becomes best boring Prime Minister that this country needs in this moment of crisis and instability.
I don’t know what you mean by if Sunak is ‘too rich for Britain’s blood’. But I can guess.
Rishi Sunak is Prime Minister number 57, in case anyone is counting. At 42 he’s a year younger than either David Cameron or Tony Blair were appointed Prime Minister. Sunak is the youngest Prime Minister win modern British political history and you would have to go all the way back to 1812, when Robert Jenkinson, 2nd Earl of Liverpool, was made Prime Minister at 42 - the youngest ever of course was William Pitt the Younger at a precocious age of 24 years old.
He’s the first British Asian of immigrant Punjabi Indian parents to be made Prime Minister, and that is definitely worth celebrating. But he’s not Britain’s first Prime Minister from a different ethnic background. That honour goes to other two former prime ministers.
Benjamin Disraeli remained Jewish regardless of the fact that he was baptised. The fact that Disraeli first held the office 155 years before Rishi Sunak demonstrates that Victorian England does not deserve the obloquy that it frequently receives for prejudices of which it was far less guilty than its contemporary counterparts elsewhere.
And then of course there was Boris Johnson. Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson was born an American. On top of which Bojo’s paternal great great grandfather was a Turkish politician, Kemal Ali. Ali Kemal was labeled as a traitor by many Turks as a result of his harsh criticism of the Turkish National Liberation Movement, and his hostile attitude and insults against Mustafa Kemal Pasha.
Perhaps including Johnson is a jokey stretch but I hope I’m making my point.
The Conservative Party doesn’t warrant such racist criticism. Not only will the first non-white Prime Minister be a Conservative; so are the first three women to hold the office. As for the other Great Offices of State: the first minority Foreign Secretary , the first two minority Chancellors of the Exchequer and the first three minority Home Secretaries have all been Tories. So much for white privilege then, as the left likes to carp on.
Needless to say, some on the Left will continue to carp, perhaps to distract from the fact that they have been much slower to promote women and ethnic minorities - just take a look on the other side of the Despatch Box in the House of Commons. But still critics say Sunak’s victory is just how white privilege works because he had to prove himself. Really? Isn’t that how life works? We all have to prove ourselves worthy of the trust and responsibilities given to us, don’t we?
In the political arena it is normal to have to prove oneself against others. Rishi Sunak lost to Liz Truss last summer mainly because he had been seen by some in the party as the principal assassin of Boris Johnson - who incidentally had promoted him to be Chancellor, replacing Sajid Javid (whose heritage is Pakistani Muslim), despite Mr Sunak’s relative youth and political inexperience. That he has taken until now to enter No 10 suggests not ‘white privilege’ but the opposite: dollops of luck which every politician needs and a ruthless meritocracy that tested his older and more experienced rival to destruction.
‘White privilege’ as a phrase may have some meaningful application in the United States, but it is positively mischievous and destructive when applied to modern Britain. Quite frankly I’m sick and tired, as many are, of how our genuine problems in our politics and society such as inequality and social mobility should always be seen through the distorting lens of American culture and politics, even down to the colonising of words such as ‘white privilege’, ‘inclusivity and diversity’, and ‘BIPOC’ (black, indigenous, and people of colour…which begs the question just who is indigenous in England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland?)
The one minority that Rishi Sunak and his wife Akshata Murty are less keen to identify with are people of wealth. Nearly every article written about Sunak, especially now that’s Prime Minister is about his wealth. ‘Rich’ is by far the most commonly used adjective to describe him. It is true that one would have to go back a long way to find a Prime Minister whose personal wealth compared to that of Sunaks - whose wealth now exceeds the British monarchy.
But Rishi Sunak is almost certainly street smart enough to know that in British politics, wealth is best kept in the background. If he has any doubts, he should ask the former MP for Richmond, London, Zac Goldsmith, son of a charismatic billionaire, whose failure to become Mayor of London was followed by the loss of his seat, twice in three elections. Like so many monied politicians, he has ended up in the House of Lords, appointed by Boris Johnson, who had his expensive holidays paid for by Goldsmith. If the new plutocracy is now to encroach on British politics, too, then better far that the billionaires know their place - what MPs derisively refer to as The Other Place.
What reinforced the the filthy rich opprobrium was the scandal of his wife Akshata Murty’s non-dom tax status - a legitimate position but not the best optics - but which has now been rectified so she does pay tax. Unlike America, Britain still secretly despises wealth or be seen not to show it off. Sunak can’t win on this but he can lessen the target area. If he was smart he would think about creating a philanthropic foundation. The prejudice against the rich is one of the last that is still seen as acceptable.
The only answer to it is to give away as much of their wealth as they can bear to part with. She would be able to demonstrate her charitable credentials in a manner that the British public would immediately find sympathetic. Great wealth is tolerated in this country when it is combined with munificence. There is no other way to disarm the politics of envy, which the Opposition parties will undoubtedly deploy ad nauseam. Rishi Sunak deserves his success, just as his family do not deserve to have his position held against them. But the Sunaks will have to make a sacrifice of part, at least, of their fortune before the new Prime Minister will gain a fair hearing when he demands sacrifices from the rest of us for the sake of the country.
To me all this is a distraction. Britain faces serious problems and it needs serious people with serious solutions.
Rishi Sunak has the toughest of challenges against some serious head winds facing both party and country.
Sunak becomes leader of the Conservative Party and the country at a critical moment in our national history. Sunak’s inbox is, to say the least, daunting. His party is in free fall and it is not yet clear if it has a parachute. The Conservatives, remarkably, are now averaging less than 20 per cent in the polls, a historic low, and trail the opposition Labour Party by more than thirty points - a situation we have not seen since the 1990s. They are heading for a complete electoral wipeout and it is now down to the young Sunak, who only entered the House of Commons in 2015, to stop this from happening.
After the disastrous experiment with Trussonomics, the party has also squandered its reputation for fiscal competence and economic credibility. And on every major issue in the country, from the cost of living through to the National Health Service, the Conservatives are simply not trusted or considered competent by a large swathe of the country.
The Tories are also bitterly divided. Sunak inherits a party that is not only tanking in the polls but lacks a unifying message, ideology and dominant faction. And if voters don’t vote for competent parties then they certainly don’t vote for divided ones. On all the key issues of tax and spend, Brexit, immigration and how to level-up the country the party is not just split between two rival camps but several different tribes, all of which Sunak will have to carefully balance, manage and reflect in his key appointments. One reason why Truss’s fall was so rapid and dramatic is because she failed to do this.
In all my conversations with friends and peers who are closer to the political coal face in England, I don’t get this sense that they or indeed anyone within those political circles can answer some of the more existential questions that now face the Conservative Party. What exactly is the purpose of post-Brexit conservatism? What do today’s conservatives believe? Where do they want to take the country? And how do they plan to hold and expand their new electoral coalition (the so-called Red Wall made up of northern working class voters)?
Sunak, a Brexit supporter, will now have to answer these questions. To do so, he would be wise to avoid the mistakes of his two main predecessors by surrounding himself with serious thinkers and strategists. The Conservative Party does not need only to renew its leadership; it needs to renew its entire intellectual scaffolding and rebuild and re-energise.
He will have to do all this while grappling with the fact that many Conservatives, whether inside or outside the party, never wanted him to become leader and prime minister to begin with. Because he was not endorsed by voters, members or even a formal vote among MPs, he is vulnerable. Inside the party, there remain many people who are loyal to Johnson and see the events in recent days as a classic, top-down stitch-up among MPs. The changing of the rules within the 1922 Committee, the call for at least 100 nominations, they argue, points to a concerted attempt among MPs to stack the deck against Johnson and override the wishes of grassroots Tories.
Outside the party, meanwhile, there are many others who go further by viewing the appointment of Sunak as part of a ‘globalist Remainer plot’ to satisfy the interests of financial markets and return to the pre-Brexit status-quo. It might be tempting to dismiss all this as the stuff of a crank fringe but it is not hard to see how it could drive some kind of populist alternative which further reduces space for the Tories at the next general election or, more simply, drives higher rates of apathy among 2019 Conservatives who choose to sit the next election out, convinced that their party is no longer really interested in what they want or have to say.
And then there is the wider country. Spiralling inflation, mortgage rates, the end of the current energy freeze in the spring, no end in sight to the war in Ukraine and the prospect of across-the-board tax rises and sharp spending cuts all hand Sunak the most daunting inbox since David Cameron faced the aftermath of the global financial crash in 2010 and Margaret Thatcher was left to fix the legacy of the dismal 1970s.
In Sunak’s short, behind-closed-doors remarks to Tory MPs after he was elected he told them they had to come together and unite. That otherwise they faced an ‘existential threat’ and there would be no second chance. He has already had to face down clarion calls for a general election - something he has already ruled out. But if he puts a foot wrong with any of the MPs who backed rivals, the calls will start up again. And some.
Now we will see exactly what financial analysts so-called ‘dullness dividend’ looks like. Bond yields - which spiked in the aftermath of last-month’s ‘mini-Budget,’ fell after Boris Johnson announced on Sunday that he was not running for office again, heading for their biggest drop since the early 1990s.
And there is much damage done. Truss’s time in office will come with a price tag, according to Bloomberg Economics. GDP is likely to be about 2% smaller next year relative to the forecast before the ruinous Sept. 23 fiscal event. The economy is on track for a contraction of 1.4% in 2023, financial analysts say, compared to the 0.5% growth predicted back in early September. See below:
The verdict is painful but plain: Both monetary and fiscal policy are set to be tightened in unison as Britain attempts to regain credibility with financial markets. Talking to colleagues and peers in corporate finance, they predict a recession similar to the one seen in the 1990s, with what they call ‘peak pain’ due for the second quarter of next year. They also see inflation spiking at 12% in April, while interest rates will have increased to 4.25% by next May from 2.25% now.
Sunak may have a reputation for competence that is already reassuring the markets, but he’ll need a fair amount of luck, too. He will need luck dealing with all this while holding leadership ratings that are not all that impressive. The last time Rishi Sunak held high office he was deep into ‘net negative’ territory, not quite as deep as Johnson and Truss, but in net negative territory all the same. If, like Truss, he does not enjoy a significant bounce in the polls in the weeks ahead this will also make his job harder, not easier.
For all these reasons, then, the challenges that face our latest prime minister are immense and unlikely to fade from view. If he responds to them well, he may fancy his chances at doing what no other prime minister in our entire national history has ever done - leading his party to a fifth consecutive election victory. But if he responds to them badly, then he will soon find himself on our rapidly growing trash heap of former prime ministers.
There will be some who follow my blog who will not support Sunak’s politics. But I am going to go out on a limb here and say it is indeed a moving thing that the man charged with getting Britain back to good economic health was also the boy who as a devoted and hard working teenage son did the books for his hard pressed mother every Saturday in her pharmacy in Southampton. That’s the side of Rishi Sunak I wish he would remember when he sits behind his desk at Number 10 Downing Street, and it’s the side I wish the great British public, fair minded and decent, can put some hope in as we navigate the economic storms to come.
Thanks for your question.
#ask#question#rishi sunak#prime minister#british politics#politics#conservative party#tories#tory party#indian#parliament#economics#crisis
42 notes
·
View notes
Text
26th November 1968 - The UK's Race Discrimination Act became law. It made it illegal to discriminate because of a person’s colour, nationality or ethnic background.
Both blatant, and latent discrimination still exists today.
People of my generation are possibly the worst offenders of latent racist or sexual discrimination... (I hope I am able to exclude myself.)
Personal note:
I grew up in the rural area of Hever, Kent. I did not see a person of different dress-tradition or skin colour in my home area until I was 9 years old... when an Hindu family from India moved into a house not far away. They were aware of the mainly racist opinions of the English at that time, and were rarely seen. I met their son (same age as me) at junior school. Some of my school fellows called him names... and deliberately made life difficult for him. I was curious... and wanted to know where he and his family came from, and why they had moved into the area. We quickly became good friends. He had a very wicked sense of humour, and was possibly more racist than any of us at the time... he once secretly told me that he hated "white boys", but this was probably a reaction to the hatred that his family experienced. (They moved out of London because of this.) We lost touch for a while after junior school, but met up again a few years later... and had several drunken nights together,
At my first senior school I encountered my first black man... and I believe that is the correct term. He was the first Afro/Caribbean that I had ever met personally. Again, a lovely fellow. But it was the teachers that gave him abuse!
I transferred to Eton College two years later, after passing my entrance exam. At Eton I met boys from all over the world. A very enlightening experience.
I even met Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson, a future Prime Minister... you probably do not know him!
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
UK update. Truss resigned, things however, are getting worse, that utetr shit Alexander Boris De pfeffel Johnson is staging a come back. contenders need 100 tory MPs to nominate them. In most Johnson thing ever he says he has over 100, but only 52 publicly declared.
The good news is that if it’s him (and if he gets on ballot the loony members will vote for him as they love him and Brexit) the party that has caused us so much pain will be dead by Christmas, he’s facing partygate inquiry, half his MPs HATE him, could be suspended from commons, triggering a by-election which he’d lose, rumours of sexual assault swirl in tory circles (I live in place where there are tory circles, they are as bad as you’d imagine). The bad news if he got in would be he’d fuck the country even more, interest rates would rise leading to higher mortgages and rents as landlords pass on costs.
So, if he gets in again and you live outside UK, please consider offering @tunglo and I refuge, think of it as humanitarian aid. The thought of that cunt Johnson (don’t call him Boris, he’s not your friend and he’s not a cuddly cartoon character, he’s an evil lying bastard who fucked the UK for generations with Brexit) in again makes me want to throw up. It’s like if Trump were to get in again, but by being voted in by republicans in congress and not at an election.
8 notes
·
View notes
Last Seen Blogs
spine441219
Spine
isabellecornish
More than you will ever know...
passmethe-auxcord
Hit Shuffle
beebahk
Untitled