Tumgik
#Online identity verification
fastraxpos · 1 year
Link
1 note · View note
The Benefits of Online Identity Verification
Tumblr media
Online identity verification is one of the technologies that have recently emerged to help legal, real estate, accounting, and similar industries streamline their verification processes. But some industries are still skeptical about the impact that this technology brings, especially since the conventional face-to-face methods have served them well for several years. To be able to understand better whether these new technologies are worth your investment, check out the following benefits of online identity verification.
One of the benefits that you can get as a result of taking advantage of id io technology is increased workflow efficiency and lower overhead costs. When you digitize your identity verification processes, you can save time, effort, and resources because you accomplish the verification steps more quickly and efficiently. If you were to manually request, photocopy, upload, and process identity documents, it means that more paper-based materials, filing cabinets and other related items, administrative personnel, etc. will be needed, all which will add to your office management costs.
Another downside with manual workflows is that they eat up more minutes and create increased idle time, meaning that you will have fewer productive transactions throughout the day, week, month, and year. When you switch to online ID proofing, you will spend less on training sessions and materials, shorten your KYC work and communication flows, and assign more business-critical tasks to your staff.
You can invest in an online identity verification solution that automatically updates individual and family profiles, notifies you of any information updates, and reminds you of upcoming document expiry and replacement dues, etc. This will help simplify your compliance audits and reporting, client onboarding, as well as other ID proofing activities.
For more information on the benefits of online identity verification, visit our website at https://loginid.io/
0 notes
rpacpc · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
How Our Identity Verification API Helps Businesses Stay Secure
An identity verification API (Application Programming Interface) is a software tool that allows developers to integrate identity verification services into their applications or websites. Identity verification APIs provide a way for businesses to verify the identity of their customers, users, or clients, typically by comparing the information provided by the individual with data from a trusted source, such as a government database or credit bureau.
There are several identity verification APIs available in the market, offered by companies such as RPACPC GST VERIFICATION API, PAN STATUS, 206AB Compliance Check among others. These APIs typically provide a range of identity verification services, such as document verification, biometric authentication, and fraud detection. 
To use an identity verification API, a developer would need to integrate the API into their application or website, typically by making API calls to the service provider's servers. The API would then return a response indicating whether the identity verification was successful or not, along with any relevant data or insights about the individual's identity.
Overall, identity verification APIs provide a way for businesses to strengthen their identity verification process, reduce fraud, and improve the user experience by making the verification process more efficient and seamless.
Identity verification is a crucial process that many businesses need to perform to ensure that their customers or users are who they claim to be.
This process helps to prevent fraud, protect against financial losses, and comply with regulatory requirements. However, performing identity verification manually can be time-consuming and error-prone, especially as more and more businesses move online. Fortunately, with the advent of identity verification APIs, businesses can now automate this process and make it more efficient and accurate.
The benefits of using an identity verification API are many. First and foremost, it provides a faster and more efficient way to verify identities. Instead of manually checking documents and cross-referencing information, businesses can automate the process and get instant results. This helps to reduce the time and effort required to perform identity verification, enabling businesses to onboard customers or users more quickly and easily.
Secondly, identity verification APIs provide a more accurate way to verify identities. APIs use a range of data sources to verify an individual's identity, such as government databases, credit bureaus, and social media platforms. This enables them to cross-reference multiple sources and detect any inconsistencies or red flags that may indicate fraudulent activity. By using an API, businesses can reduce the risk of identity fraud and protect themselves from financial losses.
Thirdly, identity verification APIs help to improve the user experience. By automating the verification process, businesses can provide a seamless and frictionless onboarding experience for their customers or users. 
This helps to reduce the drop-off rate during the onboarding process and increases the likelihood of conversion. 
Finally, identity verification APIs can help businesses comply with regulatory requirements. Many industries, such as banking and finance, have strict KYC (Know Your Customer) and AML (Anti-Money Laundering) regulations that require them to perform identity verification on their customers. By using an API, businesses can automate this process and ensure that they comply with regulatory requirements. APIs also provide a more auditable and transparent way to perform identity verification, which can help businesses demonstrate compliance to regulators.
In conclusion, identity verification APIs provide a faster, more accurate, and more convenient way for businesses to verify the identity of their customers or users. By automating the identity verification process, businesses can reduce the risk of fraud, protect against financial losses, and comply with regulatory requirements. With the increasing importance of online identity verification, businesses that use identity verification APIs are better positioned to provide a secure and seamless user experience.
2 notes · View notes
snekdood · 1 year
Text
i think its probably a good and healthy use of your time to look through a trans persons blog to try to find out of they’re secretly a terf
1 note · View note
stjohnstarling · 1 month
Text
The ACLU has launched a petition against Mastercard’s policies on adult content!
Mastercard put into effect a new policy regulating adult content sellers that makes it extremely hard for sex workers to earn a living online. It must be stopped.
The policy itself imposes strict and invasive requirements on adult content websites using Mastercard’s financial services – including pre-approval of all content before publication, forbidding certain search terms, and monitoring the age and identity verification process for all performers.
Americans sign here!!
29K notes · View notes
Text
A Identity Verification Platform Without Spending An Arm And A Leg
In an increasingly digital world identity verification platform secure and reliable identity verification has never been more critical. From financial transactions to online account creation, verifying the identity of users is essential for preventing fraud, ensuring compliance with regulations, and protecting sensitive information. Enter GreenID—a leading identity verification platform that offers innovative solutions for businesses looking to enhance security while delivering seamless user experiences. In this comprehensive guide, we'll explore the significance of identity verification platforms like GreenID and the pivotal role they play in safeguarding digital interactions.
### Understanding Identity Verification Platforms
Identity verification platforms are software solutions designed to verify the identities of individuals through various methods, such as document verification, biometric authentication, and database checks. These platforms enable businesses to confirm the identity of their users quickly and accurately, reducing the risk of fraud and enhancing trust in online transactions.
### The Role of GreenID
1. **Advanced Verification Methods**: GreenID leverages advanced verification methods, including document scanning, facial recognition, and machine learning algorithms, to verify the identities of users with a high degree of accuracy. By combining multiple verification techniques, GreenID ensures robust identity verification while minimizing friction for users.
2. **Compliance and Security**: Compliance with regulatory requirements is a top priority for businesses operating in highly regulated industries such as finance, healthcare, and telecommunications. GreenID helps businesses stay compliant with regulations such as KYC (Know Your Customer) and AML (Anti-Money Laundering) by providing robust identity verification solutions that meet regulatory standards.
3. **Fraud Prevention**: Identity theft and account takeover fraud pose significant threats to businesses and their customers. GreenID's fraud prevention capabilities help businesses detect and prevent fraudulent activities by flagging suspicious behavior, verifying the authenticity of user identities, and implementing additional security measures as needed.
4. **Seamless User Experience**: While security is paramount, providing a seamless user experience is equally important. GreenID offers frictionless identity verification solutions that integrate seamlessly into the user onboarding process, allowing businesses to verify the identities of their customers quickly and conveniently without compromising security.
5. **Scalability and Flexibility**: Whether serving small businesses or large enterprises, GreenID's identity verification platform is designed to scale according to the needs of its clients. With flexible deployment options and customizable features, GreenID enables businesses to adapt and grow without constraints.
### Key Considerations for Identity Verification
1. **Accuracy and Reliability**: Accuracy and reliability are non-negotiable when it comes to identity verification. Businesses must choose a verification platform like GreenID that employs robust verification methods and maintains high standards of accuracy.
2. **Regulatory Compliance**: Compliance with regulatory requirements is essential, especially for businesses operating in regulated industries. GreenID helps businesses navigate complex regulatory landscapes by providing solutions that comply with industry regulations and standards.
3. **Integration and Compatibility**: Seamless integration with existing systems and applications is critical for the success of identity verification initiatives. Businesses should choose a verification platform that offers flexible integration options and compatibility with a wide range of platforms and technologies.
4. **Data Security and Privacy**: Protecting sensitive user information is paramount. Businesses must prioritize data security and privacy when selecting an identity verification platform, ensuring that the platform adheres to industry best practices and complies with relevant data protection regulations.
5. **Scalability and Performance**: As businesses grow and evolve, their identity verification needs may change. Choosing a scalable and performance-driven verification platform like GreenID ensures that businesses can accommodate growth and adapt to evolving requirements seamlessly.
### Conclusion
In an era where digital interactions are ubiquitous, identity verification has become a cornerstone of online security and trust. Identity verification platforms like GreenID play a vital role in helping businesses verify the identities of their users quickly, accurately, and securely. By leveraging advanced verification methods, ensuring regulatory compliance, and prioritizing user experience, GreenID empowers businesses to streamline security and deliver seamless digital experiences. As businesses continue to navigate the complexities of the digital landscape, partnering with a trusted identity verification platform like GreenID is essential for safeguarding digital interactions and building trust with customers.
1 note · View note
kids-worldfun · 1 month
Text
Secure Customer Onboarding With Digital Document Verification Process
Companies must identify authentic users to be on board. Fraudsters use digital technology to generate fake documents in place of legal documents. Moreover, counterfeit documents seem real, as minor variations often remain unidentified. In recent years, the United States reported 1802 cybercrime cases. Companies are required to use advanced technology to verify the documents. The document…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
sprintverify · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
SprintVerify, is a No-Code Document Verification Platform, designed to democratise the verification process for the masses. Through its revolutionary “Click2Verify” characteristic, it greatly eases the otherwise tedious process of verifying documents & onboarding partners, customers or users.
0 notes
rpacpc · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
Secure Your Business with Online Identity Verification Solutions
In today’s digital age, businesses face a growing number of security challenges. One of the most significant concerns is verifying the identities of customers and clients, especially in online transactions. Identity verification is a critical process for any business to ensure the authenticity of individuals accessing their services or making transactions. Online identity verification solutions can help companies enhance their security measures and protect themselves against fraud and other risks.
Online identity verification is a process that confirms an individual’s identity by verifying their personal information, such as their name, date of birth, address, Pan, Aadhaar , GST and other relevant details. This process can be performed through various methods, including biometric identification, document verification, GST Verification and facial recognition. These methods help ensure that the person accessing the service or making the transaction is the same as the one claiming to be.
The Benefits Of Online Identity Verification For Businesses Are Numerous.
One of the most significant advantages is improved security. Identity verification solutions can help prevent fraudulent transactions, identity theft, and other malicious activities. These solutions help protect both the business and the customers from financial and reputational damage.
Identity verification solutions can also help businesses comply with regulatory requirements. Many industries, such as finance, healthcare, and gaming, have strict regulations in place to ensure that their customers are who they claim to be. By implementing identity verification solutions, businesses can comply with these regulations and avoid penalties and legal consequences.
Moreover, identity verification solutions can also help businesses enhance their customer experience. By verifying the identity of their customers quickly and efficiently, businesses can reduce the time it takes to complete transactions and improve the overall customer experience.
Customers Are More Likely To Return To Businesses That Offer a Hassle-Free And Secure Experience.
One example of an online identity verification solution is biometric identification. Biometric identification involves the use of unique physical traits, such as fingerprints, facial recognition, and iris scans, to verify an individual’s identity. Biometric identification is an effective and secure way to verify identities, as it is difficult to replicate or fake physical traits.
Document verification is another example of an online identity verification solution. This method involves verifying the authenticity of documents, such as passports, driver’s licenses, Pan and national IDs, provided by customers. Document verification can help businesses ensure that the individuals accessing their services are who they claim to be and reduce the risk of fraudulent activities.
Facial recognition is also becoming increasingly popular as an online identity verification solution. Facial recognition involves comparing a live image of an individual to a previously captured image to verify their identity. This method is quick, efficient, and secure and is being adopted by many businesses across various industries.
In conclusion, online identity verification solutions are essential for businesses to ensure the security of their transactions and protect themselves against fraud and other risks. By implementing these solutions, businesses can enhance their security measures, comply with regulatory requirements, and improve the overall customer experience. Biometric identification, document verification, and facial recognition are just a few examples of the many identity verification solutions available to businesses today. It is essential to choose the right solution that best suits the needs of the business and its customers.
0 notes
Text
!!!!!! For everyone who hasn’t always seen this article !!!!!!
Some choice quotes:
The bill sailed through the Louisiana House 96-1 and the State Senate 34-0
Nearly identical bills have passed in six other states — Arkansas, Montana, Mississippi, Utah, Virginia and Texas — by similarly lopsided margins. In Utah and Arkansas, the bills passed unanimously.
According to Ethical Capital Partners, the private equity company that owns Pornhub, traffic in Louisiana has dropped 80 percent.
In the other three states where the laws have been in effect for months — Utah, Mississippi, and Virginia — Pornhub did something even more unprecedented: It simply stopped operating. (Note: this also happened in Arkansas.)
Not only have six states passed copycat legislation, but 16 more have introduced similar or nearly identical bills. (Note: link is to a bill tracker with the free speech coalition, a pro-pornography “trade association”…the list in one place is still useful though.)
This is amazing!
1K notes · View notes
mortalityplays · 1 year
Text
This is a very good illustration of the increasing susceptibility to conspiratorial thought patterns I've been seeing on the left lately. Just because you don't believe there are space marines on Mars doesn't mean you're immune to building imaginary connections between aesthetic or emotional data points and mistaking them for evidence. A lot of well meaning people in my circles have been sharing this story, buying uncritically into the first narrative they encountered. I want to break down why:
Jones' twitter thread was extremely emotional and extremely urgent. The idea of a child being ripped away from his frantic mother and a ticking clock to decide his fate both helped the story to bypass analytical scrutiny. It sends the message 'act now, before it's too late, it's the only compassionate thing to do'.
Her connection to an existing conspiracy (a concerted effort by the state to cover up Covid statistics) creates a strengthening association with the idea that this is also a conspiracy. The thread offers no positive evidence that her son's arrest was a conspiracy, and no positive evidence that his arrest has any connection to her prior experiences.
Jones' allegation that the arrest was retribution for her actions as a whistleblower implicitly identifies her in the reader's mind. A lot could be unpacked about her dispute with the DOH but it doesn't really matter because I don't think most people who circulated this story knew much about it either way. The point is that it anchors her identity in a few key concepts: 'whistleblower', 'covid scientist', 'concerned citizen'. None of these qualities are relevant to the events detailed in the thread (or evidenced in the thread, if we're being really rigorous), but they unconsciously prejudice the reader's assessment of whether to trust or side with her. Simply put, if you are concerned about how covid was handled and/or inclined to support whistleblowers, you are more likely to assume she's credible.
If you dislike and distrust cops, you are primed to accept a narrative in which they are doing something straightforwardly evil. Don't get me wrong, fuck 12, but I say that armed with an enormous preponderance of cases in which we have positive evidence of police acting out of self interest, cruelty, corruption, racism, misogyny, etc. Allowing ourselves to be seduced by the fantasy that they are always always without fail breaking rules and fashing it up in broad daylight only makes us easier to delude and manipulate.
She repeatedly made the point that her son is autistic. Again, if you are autistic or sympathetic to autistic people, you are more likely to be 'warmed up' by this detail and inclined to take her side. I'm not going to say it's irrelevant to the idea that he was being unfairly targeted, but it is overwhelmingly emotionally weighted. And again, it is not evidence that he was unfairly targeted. It's another weight on the scale that tips you to judge the truth value of her story without reality checking.
The example of a meme that she shared is characteristic of a type of online humour that is at least familiar to most of us. If you or your friends make edgy jokes and share tasteless irony memes, or if you've been online for more than like a week, you understand that they're mostly harmless. The idea that this meme could be used as evidence by law enforcement to detain you is ideologically threatening in an immediately relatable way. It evokes a reflex defensive impulse — that's not fair, the cops are wrong, the kid is innocent — bypassing the process of verification. Is this meme the reason he was arrested? Is it the only one he posted? Is it the only reason he was arrested?
All of these factors create a gut-led constellation of information that quickly forms a picture. Because it is being pieced together from multiple subconscious feelings and prejudices, it feels as if it has been evidenced. Because the thread was highly emotional and highly urgent, readers were pressured to jump to rapid conclusions and ask "what can I do to help?" (and the answer, as it almost always is, was 'donate money, quick').
I want to be really clear that I am not saying Jones manufactured any of these effects on purpose. It would be completely within reason that having a young child arrested would send anyone into an emotional tailspin, grasping for reasons this might have happened, leaping to his defense, rallying resources to fight on his behalf. I am not in any way ascribing malice to her actions.
What I'm interested in is the effect that this emotive kneejerk appeal had on people who were unknowingly predisposed to believe that the state of Florida would kidnap a child to punish a scientist for disagreeing with the department of health about covid statistics. That is a baseless conspiracy theory, and a huge number of people in my immediate circles reflexively amplified it.
Personally, I think arrest is a godawful way to respond to a child having a mental health crisis, even if they are seen to pose a violent threat. That still doesn't mean the cops did it at the bidding of a mad dictator in waiting. In the hypothetical parallel universe where it turns out Jones was right and this was all a conspiracy to punish her, it still would not have served the situation to jump to that conclusion on a gut feeling.
Pausing to identify relevant, verifiable facts before sharing a story like this is always warranted, even if you think the person telling it is 'on your side'. The more you worry that questioning the narrative wastes precious time or makes you a bad person, the more you should scrutinise why you are being made to feel that way. Accepting unfounded conspiracies into your worldview is not benign, even if you think the 'targets' deserve it. It erodes your critical perspective and turns you into a vector for the people around you.
tl;dr: you are not immune to baseless conspiratorial thought
857 notes · View notes
akaratna · 2 months
Text
02/27/2024: THE BILL HAS NOT PASSED THE SENATE YET. BUT IT IS COMING TO VOTE WITHIN THE NEXT FEW DAYS.
CONTACT YOUR SENATORS TO DEMAND THEY VOTE NO ON THIS BILL.
CONTACT YOUR REPRESENTATIVE ALSO AS IT WILL GO TO THE HOUSE NEXT
CALL SCRIPT:
My name is __________. I am a constituent, and my zip code is _______. .
To your Senators :
I’m urging you to vote no on Senate Bill 1409. This is yet another attempt to shove censorship and surveillance down our throats “for the children” and I’m urging you not to fall for this LIE. Thank you.
To your Representative:
I’m asking you to please vote no on Senate Bill 1409 if it passes the Senate. This is yet another attempt to shove censorship and surveillance down our throats “for the children” and I’m asking you not to fall for this lie. Thank you.
Background
We all benefit when we can all access the public square and speak our minds freely, even—maybe especially—about sensitive topics and traumatic experiences. We need to be able to discuss these things, not just as cold abstractions but as personal experiences, to do the work of reducing the amount of harm in the world.
From time to time, lawmakers—well-intentioned or otherwise—try to take away our access to the public square, our right to speak freely in it, or both, often in the name of “protecting our children” from some of those harms. But we cannot repair or prevent those harms if we cannot discuss them.
The latest attempt is S.1409, deceptively named the “Kids Online Safety Act”. This one leverages anger at Big Tech over social media moderation decisions as an excuse to force harmful blanket policies on all Americans.
KOSA is one of the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s “Bad Internet Bills” for two main reasons:
KOSA would require you to show papers to use the internet
KOSA would require messaging services (think iMessage, Signal, or WhatsApp) and social media websites to try to shield the eyes of minors against certain topics. It’s likely that these services would comply with these requirements by forcing users to provide proof of age.
Realistically, this means forcing people to prove their identity to every service they sign up for.
The age requirements affect everyone. If this bill passes, you will have to submit to some sort of identity verification to prove your identity and thus your age every time you sign up on a new service. You will always have to do this, over and over again, for the rest of your life.
How that verification works is not specified. It might be one of the sketchy automatic-verification services like the one the IRS almost used, or they might simply ask you to upload some form of identity documentation. Tough luck if you’re undocumented, a victim of identity theft, transgender, or actually underage. Even if you’re none of those things, you will still have lost your anonymity—your identity is only one successful subpoena or data breach away from being in the wrong hands.
There are very real hazards that come from pairing identity verification with private or anonymous communications. At a time when healthcare decisions like abortion or gender-affirming care are being criminalized in some states, and workers are forming unions and facing unfair labor practices, and activists like us are holding government accountable, we must recognize the importance of protecting the right to speak privately or anonymously whenever we want or need to.
You have the right to speak anonymously, and the right to choose what you disclose and what you keep private. We must protect these rights.
KOSA would require messaging services and social media companies to censor you
Currently, you are legally responsible for what you say online—not the companies who own the services you say it on.
This is thanks to a law from the 1990s known as “Section 230” (specifically, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996). Law professor and author Jeff Kosseff called Section 230 “The Twenty-Six Words That Created the Internet” in his book by that title, recounting the history of conflicts between the First Amendment (and its broad protections of speech) and the harms that can be done with speech, and the development of the Act in that context. Kosseff argues that the internet as we know it today, as a public square where anyone can participate, was created because Section 230’s protections enabled freedom to flourish.
KOSA threatens to undermine those protections by obligating companies to intervene when people talk about certain topics on their platforms. This would create, in effect, a censorship regime—if you’ve ever seen the lengths TikTok users go to in order to try to exercise their free-speech rights without saying things that will get them suspended, you’ve seen what this looks like in action. KOSA would make it legally mandatory on all messaging services and all social media.
No good would come out of forcing these companies to insert themselves into our conversations.
The minute a system exists that tries to decide what people can and can’t say—on the internet or otherwise—that system begins chilling speech. If this bill passes, you will have to think about what you are and are not willing to discuss with others, even in private via instant-messengers, much less in the public square via social media.
You will choose to refrain from talking about some things—your speech will have been chilled. When you do choose to talk about some things, you will have to contort your speech to evade censorship.
And there will always be false positives and false negatives. People who didn’t fall afoul of the law will get censored anyway because the system made a mistake. People who did say something on the proscribed list may get lucky—until they don’t.
This affects all communications, public and private
It’s bad enough to censor people’s public discussions on social media and limit who can contribute to such discussions. It’s even worse to censor people’s private communications via iMessage, WhatsApp, and other messaging services.
You have the right to have private conversations without anybody sticking their nose in, no matter who you are or what you’re talking about.
Beware of simple “solutions”
People are complicated and that makes the rights and responsibilities of speech complicated. There are no simple answers.
Speech can cause harm. The classical example of speech not protected by the First Amendment is shouting “fire!” in a crowded theater—that is, causing a panic, a stampede, injuries, possibly deaths. The fact that the cause of the panic was an act of speech does not shield the speaker from responsibility for the harms that act caused. For a more recent example, consider Trump’s lies about the 2020 election before, during, and after it, by which he fomented an insurrection on January 6, 2021, for which he has been criminally indicted. The First Amendment protects his right to lie, but does not give him a right to start an insurrection.
Speech can also do great good. People have the right to cry out for help, or to speak about injustice. We can work together to solve problems—if we can talk about those problems in the first place.
KOSA is promoted as a simple solution to complex harms. As such, we can recognize that it is a false solution that would do more harm than good. We must protect our right to participate fully and frankly, in both public discourse and private conversation, against this sort of attack.
The EFF is right: This is a bad internet bill
This bill would, in effect, force instant-messaging services and social-media services to begin dossiers on their users and impose a censorship regime. This will not solve any problems; it will only take away our right to use the internet to speak freely.
In spite of these dangers, the bill has the bipartisan support of 43 senators. It wouldn’t take many more for it to have a real chance at passing the Senate. The time to stop it is now.
References
S.1409, Kids Online Safety Act (118th Congress)
“The Kids Online Safety Act is Still A Huge Danger to Our Rights Online”, Electronic Frontier Foundation, 5/2/2023
98 notes · View notes
Note
Am I the asshole for not telling my ex roommate her change of address didn't go through?
I and my roommate had a falling out and they're now moved out. This falling out has caused me to lose multiple relationships and wrecked havoc on my life. We are no longer associated with each other.
I got a letter in the mail saying their address change was put on hold pending identity verification. It needs them to complete a form online.
If I wanted I could get this to them I probably could, but I really don't want to because of all the rumors they started.
So would I be the asshole for not letting them know and having their mail sent here still? I don't plan to open any and would eventually get it to them. I just want to be petty for a bit.
What are these acronyms?
102 notes · View notes
sprintverify · 1 year
Text
SprintVerify
Customer verification is the process of verifying the identity of a customer before granting them access to an account or providing them with a service.
The process of customer verification can involve collecting and verifying personal information and documentation from the customer, such as their name, address, and government-issued identification. This information is used to confirm that the person trying to access an account or service is who they claim to be. Various methods can be used for customer verification, including document verification, biometric authentication, database checks, and two-factor authentication (2FA).
Customer verification has become increasingly important in recent years, as more transactions and interactions are taking place online. This has created new opportunities for fraudsters to steal personal information and engage in illegal activities. By implementing customer verification processes, businesses can protect themselves and their customers from these risks.
In addition to providing security benefits, customer verification can also enhance the customer experience by providing peace of mind and building trust between the customer and the business. By ensuring that only authorized individuals have access to accounts and services, businesses can also reduce the risk of fraudulent chargebacks and improve the overall efficiency of their operations.
By implementing customer verification processes, businesses can improve security, reduce risk, and provide a better customer experience.
The use and benefits of customer verification include:
Enhanced security: Customer verification helps to ensure that the person accessing an account or making a transaction is who they claim to be, reducing the risk of unauthorized access, fraud, and identity theft.
Regulatory compliance: Many industries, such as finance, require businesses to comply with regulations such as Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) requirements. Customer verification can help businesses meet these requirements.
Reduced risk of chargebacks: By verifying customer identities, businesses can reduce the risk of fraudulent chargebacks, which occur when a customer disputes a transaction they did not make.
Improved customer experience: While customer verification can add an extra step to the account registration or login process, it can also provide customers with greater peace of mind knowing that their accounts and data are secure.
Increased trust: Customer verification can help to establish trust between businesses and their customers, which can lead to increased loyalty and repeat business.
Overall, customer verification is an important tool for businesses that want to improve security, comply with regulations, reduce risk, and build trust with their customers. By implementing a customer verification solution, businesses can protect their customers' data and improve the overall customer experience.
There are many customer verification platforms available, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. The best platform for customer verification depends on the specific needs of a business, such as the level of security required, the type of verification methods needed, and the budget available.
There are several methods that businesses can use to verify their customers, depending on their specific needs and requirements. Some common methods include:
Document verification: This involves verifying the authenticity of a government-issued ID, such as a passport or driver's license, by comparing it to a database or using computer vision technology to scan and analyze the document.
Biometric authentication: This involves verifying a customer's identity using biometric data, such as facial recognition, fingerprints, or voice recognition.
Database checks: This involves verifying a customer's identity by checking their personal information against public or private databases, such as credit bureaus or government records.
Two-factor authentication (2FA): This involves requiring customers to provide two forms of identification, such as a password and a one-time code sent via text message or email.
In-person verification: This involves verifying a customer's identity in person, such as by asking them to provide identification and taking a photo or video of them.
It's important to note that businesses should only collect and use customer data for verification purposes that are necessary and relevant to the services provided. Additionally, businesses should comply with applicable laws and regulations, such as those related to data privacy and protection.
SprintVerify, is a No-Code Document Verification Platform, designed to democratise the verification process for the masses. Through its revolutionary “Click2Verify” characteristic, it greatly eases the otherwise tedious process of verifying documents & onboarding partners, customers or users.
Verify all major documents in real-time, with just a click! Our easy-to-use platform enables fast onboarding through online document verification.
SprintVerify delivers a first-of-its-kind, A.I-Powered Document Verification experience that is Fast, Secure & Reliable.
SprintVerify ’s Sandbox lets you test all the Verification products on our platform for free! Just sign up to access it & avail your free credits now.
Notable SprintVerify products are Aadhaar Verification API, PAN Verification API, GST Verification API, Passport Verification API & RC Verification API among many more.
0 notes
coolaboutlucy · 3 months
Text
Not they tryna reenact KOSA… anyway yall, here’s why KOSA is bad!!
If you don’t already know, KOSA, or Kids Online Safety Act is a bill that was proposed to keep children safe on the internet. You might ask ‘why is this bill bad if it’s in favor of supporting the safety of children online’? Well, according to stopkosa.com, it puts pressure on platforms to add even MORE filters on anything they think is inappropriate for children. This is especially harmful for LBGTQIA+ youth because the knowledge about this topic would be censored, as well as knowledge on suicide prevention and LGBTQIA+ support groups. Do you see how this an issue? For those children who are wanting to learn more about these topics they’d be turned away because of this bill. It would also be likely that it’ll allow the shutdown of websites that allow them to learn about race, sexuality and gender.
This bill would also add more internet surveillance for all users across all social media platforms. It would expand the use of age verification and parental monitoring controls. These things in itself are already very invasive, but doesn’t take into consideration the children who live in unsafe environments where they are domestically abused and/or are trying to escape these situations. To add my two cents onto this, I strongly believe that the KOSA bill is an unnecessary violation of our first amendment rights (if you’re American), and doesn’t really make the internet any more safer. It actually makes it more unusable for youth. Hypothetically, if this bill were to be passed, then this would make social media unusable for literally anybody. To censor content from the youth about wanting to learn about their identity is extremely harmful. Blocking them from accessing resources that may prove as helpful in their scenarios is outlandish and unneeded. We try to shelter our youth so much to the point where we try to boil them down to only being with their parents want them to be and also not being able to let them learn and explore about other things that they may want to identify themselves with. This is very harmful.
This is a list of companies who are saying no to KOSA ..
• Access Now
• ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union)
• Black and Pink National
• Center for Democracy & Technology
• COLAGE
• Defending Rights & Dissent
• Don’t Delete Art
• EducateUS: SIECUS In Action
• Electronic Frontier Foundation
• Equality Arizona
• Equality California
• Equality Michigan
• Equality New Mexico
• Equality Texas
• Fair Wisconsin
• Fairness Campaign
• Fight for the Future
• Free Speech Coalition
• Freedom Network USA
• Indivisible Eastside
• Indivisible Plus Washington
• Internet Society
• Kairos
• Lexington Pride Center
• LGBT Technology Partnership
• Massachusetts Transgender Political Coalition
• Media Justice
• National Coalition Against Censorship
• Open Technology Institute
• OutNebraska
• PDX Privacy
• Presente.org
• Reframe Health and Justice
• Restore The Fourth
• SIECUS: Sex Ed for Social Change
• SWOP Behind Bars 
• TAKE
• TechFreedom
• The 6:52 Project Foundation, Inc.
• The Sex Workers Project of the Urban Justice Center
• Transgender Education Network of Texas
• TransOhio
• University of Michigan Dearborn – Muslim Student Association 
• URGE
• WA People’s Privacy
• Woodhull Freedom Foundation
There is something you can do to stop the KOSA bill from being passed! On the website I linked, there is a petition. All you have to do is fill out the information and it’ll send off an email for you. The email reads as follows:
I’m writing to urge you to reject the Kids Online Safety Act, a misguided bill that would put vulnerable young people at risk. KOSA would fail to address the root issues related to kid’s safety online. Instead, it would endanger some of the most vulnerable people in our society while undermining human rights and children’s privacy. The bill would result in widespread internet censorship by pressuring platforms to use incredibly broad “content filters” and giving state Attorneys General the power to decide what content kids should and shouldn’t have access to online. This power could be abused in a number of ways and be politicized to censor information and resources. KOSA would also likely lead to the greater surveillance of children online by requiring platforms to gather data to verify user identity. There is a way to protect kids and all people online from egregious data abuse and harmful content targeting: passing a strong Federal data privacy law that prevents tech companies from collecting so much sensitive data about all of us in the first place, and gives individuals the ability to sue companies that misuse their data. KOSA, although well-meaning, must not move forward. Please protect privacy and stop the spread of censorship online by opposing KOSA.
The website also gives you like a format of what you can say if you chose to call your representatives. If after reading this post, you feel inclined to do something then I would say just go ahead and do it. My first time learning about KOSA was today immediately after seeing the post I felt inclined to send my lawmakers an email. Please try to help when you can and this will only take a few minutes so I think this is something that you can consider. This post is getting a little long now, so I’ll stop here. There are more resources online if you would like to learn more about the cons of this KOSA bill, thank you for reading.
98 notes · View notes
xxstarlight-lifexx · 2 months
Text
Some quotes I have from people speaking out against KOSA, please reblog, tag people, cross-post on other platforms, and share with everyone you can, all quotes are fair use <3
“This law is a scam, created with the express purpose of persecuting LGBTQ+ people and silencing victims of abuse. That is the only possible outcome of these kinds of bills.
Oppose them on principle. Be skeptical whenever they are even brought-up.
This isn’t about safety—it is a takeover of THE major avenue to disseminate information in the modern world. It is more than censorship, it defines the avenues that thought may even take.
It will lead to identity verification companies like Clear or ID.me getting more of people’s private data and guaranteed, exclusive government contracts for surveillance and data collection, in violation of the spirit of the 4th Amendment, if not the letter.
It is also an absolute certainty that conservatives in positions of authority will use this program to persecute LGBTQ+ people, with the force of the State, under the guise of protecting children from pornography and "grooming". It has been an explicit misdirection tactic the right has invented to poison debate on trans rights issues and the (unconnected) growing evidence of sexual impropriety among the powerful, particularly conservatives.
Furthermore, I and most others will not abide by this law, if it is passed, and will take whatever actions necessary to safeguard our personal information via VPN, encryption, onion networking, etc., regardless of their permissibility.”
“This is a violation of basic rights on the Internet. Whatever happened to Freedom of Speech? Or are we just gonna ignore a literal Amendment in favor of “protecting the American children" while many of those children are the ones against this??”
“having full privacy on the internet may have saved my life growing up. don’t take away kid’s privacy, there’s already perfectly reasonable ways for parents to monitor kids.”
“I think that people have a right to privacy online, especially children. This doesn't seem like a bill that would actually protect children from anything, it would just make important resources more difficult to access, increase censorship online, and increase surveillance, all of which I oppose.”
“There are three things you never give out on the internet for your safety. 1) Name, 2) Face, and 3) Home. This bill guarantees that all three will be easily available to those who wish to hurt the children this bill falsely claims to protect. If you actually care about children, stop this bill. Listen to what those of us that actually use the internet are telling you. Children and adults deserve a private, anonymous space to be.”
“i'm a queer teen and i know full well the importance online spaces have in supporting lgbtq+ youth, especially ones who don't have supportive environments in person. censorship doesn't actually erase the information, it just makes it harder to access.”
“I’m writing to urge you to reject the Kids Online Safety Act, a misguided bill that would put vulnerable young people at risk.
KOSA would fail to address the root issues related to kid’s safety online. Instead, it would endanger some of the most vulnerable people in our society while undermining human rights and children’s privacy. The bill would result in widespread internet censorship by pressuring platforms to use incredibly broad “content filters” and giving state Attorneys General the power to decide what content kids should and shouldn’t have access to online. This power could be abused in a number of ways and be politicized to censor information and resources.
KOSA would also likely lead to the greater surveillance of children online by requiring platforms to gather data to verify user identity.
There is a way to protect kids and all people online from egregious data abuse and harmful content targeting: passing a strong Federal data privacy law that prevents tech companies from collecting so much sensitive data about all of us in the first place, and gives individuals the ability to sue companies that misuse their data.
KOSA, although well-meaning, must not move forward. Please protect privacy and stop the spread of censorship online by opposing KOSA.”
“Censorship doesn't keep kids safe. Censorship does not save abused children. Censorship does not save queer children. Censorship will not save any of us. Freedom for us all. Freedom for the internet. This shit cannot stand.”
“This bill is a massive overreach on civil liberties and freedom of speech in particular. It should not be within the government's purview to determine what content is acceptable, no matter which party is in power.”
“As we all know, the major threats to American children today are books, bathrooms, and the Internet.
Not getting shot in their own schools or attacked on their own streets.
Since graduating from the public school system in 2007, I haven't seen anything from elected officials to contradict this.”
“KOSA is a censorship bill in sheep’s clothing. It would erode Americans’ rights to privacy, especially that of vulnerable and marginalized Americans, and gather information about the whereabouts and identities of the children it play-acts at “protecting”.”
“This is a ridiculous law
KOSA is a giant bill that is pretending to be about child safety, but is actually overreaching government censorship. It is a violation of free speech and the 1st amendment.
This bill would require that internet users upload their government ID to access any site, and state attorney generals could sue to remove any site that contains content deemed "harmful" to children. The government will be able to censor ANYTHING - such as abortion info, LGBTQ+ resources, and any content relating to protesting or organizing. They will also be able to ID you if you search for any of these topics. This is the opposite of a free internet!”
“The law is pretty much just a trojan horse for censorship.”
“frankly i dont want to be put on a list the gov has of every queer person who opposes their anti-lgbt laws”
“I care about actually helping people instead of making a bill that is going to kill any ability for anyone to get help. That is going to be used to police anyone who disagrees with the absolute mess everything is right now. The conservative morals don’t allow for anyone not white, cuz, straight, or male; and I won’t have that enforced on the fucking public forum.”
77 notes · View notes