Video Editing AI leverages advanced algorithms to automate tedious tasks and enhance the overall editing workflow. Say goodbye to hours spent meticulously adjusting every frame and hello to a streamlined process that lets you focus on unleashing your creative vision.
With Video Editing AI, the possibilities are endless. From intelligent scene detection to automated color correction, this powerful tool empowers creators to produce professional-quality videos with ease. Whether you're a filmmaker, vlogger, or business owner, Video Editing AI puts the tools of the trade right at your fingertips.
Embrace the future of content creation with Video Editing AI and unlock a world of creativity without limits. Whether you're a seasoned pro or just starting out, let Video Editing AI be your trusted companion on the journey to bringing your vision to life on screen.
VidIQ AI is a powerful tool that can help you to create videos 10x faster than ever before. With VidIQ AI, you can automatically generate scripts, transcribe videos, create subtitles, and more. This can save you hours of time and effort, and it can help you to create high-quality videos that are more likely to engage your audience.
How to make videos 10x faster using VidIQ AI:
Create a VidIQ…
want to give my two cents on the AI usage in the maestro trailer--
i think seventeen doing a whole concept that is anti-AI is very cool, especially as creatives themselves i think it's good that they're speaking up against it and i hope it gets more ppl talking about the issue. i also understand on a surface level the artistic choice (whether it was made by the members, the mv director, or whoever else), to directly use AI in contrast to real, human-made visuals and music in order to criticize it. i also appreciate that they clearly stated the intention of the use of AI at the beginning of the video
however, although i understand it to an extent, i do not agree with the choice to use AI to critique AI. one of the main ethical concerns with generative AI is that it is trained on other artists' work without their knowledge, consent, or compensation. and even when AI generated images are being used to critique AI, it still does not negate this particular ethical concern
the use of AI to critique also does not negate the fact that this is work that could have been done by an actual artist. i have seen some people argue that it's okay in this context because it's a critique specifically about AI, and it is content that never would have been done by a real artist anyway because it doesn't make sense for the story they're trying to tell. but i disagree. i think you can still tell the exact same story without using AI
and in fact, i would argue that it would make the anti-AI message stronger if they HAD paid an artist to draw/animate the scenes that are supposed to represent AI generated images. wouldn't it just be proof that humans can create images that are just as bad and nonsensical and soulless as AI, but that AI can't replicate the creativity and beauty and basic fucking anatomy that's in human-made art?
it feels very obvious this was not just a way to cut corners and costs like a lot of scummy people are using AI for. ultimately it was a very intentional creative decision, i just personally think it was a very poor one. and even if some ethical considerations were taken into account before this decision, i certainly don't think all of them were. at the very least i feel like the decision undermines the message they want to convey
i would also like to recognize that i myself am not an artist, and i have seen some artists that are totally on board with the use of AI in this specific context, so clearly this is not a topic that is cut and dry. but generative AI is still new, and i think it's important to keep having these conversations
I'll seek to make thy happiness so great that e'en the name of liberty's forgot.
Rachel's conveying that she would try to make Chloe so happy, that the concept of being free from anyone wouldn't matter anymore. She is willing to commit to prioritising Chloe's joy so much so that Chloe wouldn't want to be apart from her -- they'd want to be together forever, even at the sacrifice of their own freedom. And I still have people on yt telling me they were doomed from the start, and I still saw people saying the entire Tempest scene shows how suppressive she is, even though she still leaves the ultimate decision to Chloe. Might be a stretch, but didn't Rachel hide those ugly mess she got involved in from Chloe because she wanted Chloe to be happy instead of hurt, after all?
I wanted Rachel to fully confess her love, and so I made this from an actual snippet of the Tempest:
Just marry already. Say yes! (full video below)
That aside, one thing the remastered didn't do well in this scene was the lighting. Where did all the shadows go? They made everything so much brighter that the original just looks more natural.
genuinely love it when robot media just goes ‘yeah of course they’re a person with emotions that’s deserving of empathy. they’re feeling an emotion right now. can we talk about something more interesting now?’