Tumgik
#uncriticized
k3lyacwfa · 1 year
Text
MILF and teen Dana Vespoli and Tiffany Doll 【巨乳/美女】「一発ヤラせてくれよ~」マッチングで出会った巨乳人妻は押しに弱かったので即尺発射w 個人撮影 爆乳 射精 ハメ撮り Japanese big tits boobs cumshot Riding the Cowgirl sex machine and squirt on the panty Janelle Fennec big dick shemale Young Angel Wicky rental inspection and titfucking Minha novinha gozando na siririca Paying the Rent with ms Paris Rose Horny German granny fucks her guest Dane Jones Huge natural boobs Asian gives thick cock guy a titfuck cumshot Freaky Blonde Amateur teen strips and deepthroats a brush
0 notes
bzfjjnz4e9n8 · 1 year
Text
Rompiendole el culo a la flaca Latino gay sex movietures and young boys stripping out of clothes Hardcore anal gaping slumber party with these two blonde lesbians Chloe Cherry and Kenzie Reeves Big Tit Blonde beauty tortures Sex slave in dungeon Excited mom with bald pussy takes large cock in mouth Hungry gay boy gets filmed while swallowing a cock Big Titted Wife Sucking Her First BBC Dick Strong Miho Ichiki working two cocks in hardcor - More at Japanesemamas.com Irish teen blowjob Busty Nadia stuffs her tight pussy with a rainbow dildo
0 notes
fagoutboy · 10 months
Text
sorry hold on. are people valorizing the past so strongly these days that now ppl think old fandoms were BETTER? like im sorry i really think the problem is just that you arent 12 anymore
4 notes · View notes
heyftinally · 1 month
Note
i love bitching about taylor swift and im glad that the new album is causing some more people to realize she isn’t a good writer or person
Honestly, if she was a less shit person and less shoved down our throats 24/7/365, I wouldn't even care as much that her writing sucks. There are countless musicians who can't write for shit.
But if Taylor Swift is going to have the entire fucking world in her chokehold, then I'm going to hold her accountable for AT THE VERY LEAST not actively being a piece of shit.
If she wants to keep writing shitty lyrics, fine. Karma is a stupid song, and she has the right to write stupid songs.
But she does not have the right to profit off of marginalized communities while actively causing harm to those communities. She doesn't have the right to ignore a genocide, date a racist, be friends with a transphobe, and still call herself an ally to those marginalized communities that her relationships harm. She doesn't have the right to live her life uncriticized when she actively does harm.
And her fans don't have the right to bully and harass anyone who doesn't like her just because they're fucking feral and part of her white woman tears cult.
And before anyone says it: I don't hate Taylor Swift because she's a woman, I hate her because she's a shit person with shit morals who cares for nothing and no one but herself and her money. Her being a woman is irrelevant, and if you think otherwise then you don't know enough about me to have formed that opinion, because I call out shit men constantly, as well, and have for YEARS.
Genuinely, I hope this newest wave of criticism, specifically with her shitty ableist lyrics, starts teaching some of her brainwashed followers that she isn't perfect, and convinces them to use their brains.
Hold her accountable, and if she refuses to do anything of value to make reparations, let her face the consequences. Everyone wants to bitch and cry when Taylor gets a joke made "at her expense" at an awards show, but when she makes a joke out of murder and abuse it's fine?
Nah, absolutely not. I'm not letting that slide. I will hold bigots accountable, because bigotry is never acceptable. I don't care how special swifties think their overrated pop priss is.
177 notes · View notes
justlookfrightened · 10 months
Text
Invisibility
A teeny Zimbits ficlet
“Hmm. Jack, if you could have a superpower, what would it be?”
Bitty looked up from his phone to ask the question of Jack, who was making an omelet for breakfast. It was one of Jack’s favorite things, to cook for Bitty, especially when there was a morning when they could both sleep (or not-sleep) in, and then cook and sit and eat and drink coffee and clean up together before even considering starting their day.
“I don’t know,” Jack said. “Mind reading, maybe? So people wouldn’t be so confusing all the time.”
Bitty considered the mess of motivations that had made him do anything from adding ginger to a peach pie to kissing Jack on the ice after he won the Stanley Cup.
“I’m not sure knowing what people are thinking would make things less confusing, sweet pea,” Bitty said. 
“What about you?” Jack asked. “What superpower would you have?”
“Invisibility,” Bitty replied immediately.
“You didn’t even think about that,” Jack said. “Anyway, why would you want to be invisible?”
“Why not?” Bitty said. “If you’re invisible, no one can hurt you.”
“Huh.” Jack gave a dissatisfied sort of grunt, and turned back to the eggs.
Bitty didn’t know why Jack was bothered. He’d always thought invisibility would be the best superpower for him, ever since he first considered the question.
He’d been in high school, clinging to the end of the bench at the lunch table where all the misfits sat. Well, the misfits-but-not-outcasts. It had a couple of band geeks, the one cheerleader who never sat with the rest, the kid who was always the stage manager and never on stage for the drama productions. The only student in Bitty’s class who played on the rec league hockey team had invited Bitty to join them, and Bitty was doing his best to not be relegated (again) to outcast status.
One of the girls — Bitty thought it was the cheerleader, but his memory might be faulty — had read the question out of a quiz in a magazine, and most people had answered things like flying or having super strength or x-ray vision. 
Then someone said they’d like to be invisible, in order to do whatever they wanted and never get caught, and Bitty had thought the idea of not being seen sounded like a kind of heaven. Not  that he wanted to avoid the blame for any misdeeds; he just didn’t want to be seen. If the football players couldn’t see him, they couldn’t push him into lockers or trip him near the top of the stairs. His Algebra II teacher couldn’t call him to the front of the room to solve impossible problems. If Coach couldn’t see him, he couldn’t “playfully” cuff him on the back of the head and ask when he’d find a girlfriend.
He’d miss his mama’s hugs, he thought. But maybe the power would allow him to be visible when he wanted to be, or maybe mama would just understand, and hug him when he told her he was there.
Ever since then, “invisibility” had been his stock answer to the superpower question. Even though there were no longer any football players dogging his steps, the idea of going through life unobserved, and thus uncriticized, had a more than passing appeal.
Apparently, his answer sparked more than passing thoughts in Jack, who brought it up as soon as breakfast was ready.
“I’d really miss being able to see you, bud,” Jack said.
“Yeah?” Bitty asked, purposely looking up at Jack through his eyelashes. “See something you like?”
“Always,” Jack said, “But I didn’t mean like that. I meant, I don’t like the idea of a world where you just disappeared. And I don’t understand how you can say you would want that, either. You’re always out there, whether it’s online or on the ice. You figure skated. You did a sport where, literally, everyone was looking at you because you were the only one to look at.”
“And I stopped doing that sport, because when people noticed, they decided I’d make a good tackling dummy,” Bitty said. “Figure skating was different. When I was on the ice, I was alone, and no one could get to me. No one could touch me. And when I make videos online, it’s kind of the same. No one can hurt me. Even if someone is rude in the comments, I can block them and move on. Aren’t there times you would have liked to be invisible, with the way people have invaded your privacy?”
“Sure, sometimes,” Jack answered. “But not for long. And I remember that the problem is their behavior, not my existence.”
“I never said I didn’t want to exist,” Bitty said. “I just want people to leave me alone.”
“Even me?” Jack’s voice was small. 
“Never you,” Bitty said. “Well … there were some times my freshman year. But not now. I want people to live my life and keep their nastiness to themselves. And my life includes you.”
“That’s good,” Jack said. “And for the record, I think it’s good that people can see you. I think they need to see you, because you are strong and determined and good. Sorry if that sounds corny. I don’t mean it to be. I really believe that you are good, and people need to see that.”
Bitty was nearly tearing up.
“Oh, come on,” Bitty said. “Don’t be so nice to me! You’re gonna make me cry. I do appreciate that’s how you feel. And maybe … maybe it is different now. Now that we’re together, and I don’t feel alone.”
“So, if not invisibility, then what?”
“Have you ever thought about what it would feel like to fly?” 
73 notes · View notes
radravena · 11 months
Text
Isn't it annoying to see people in tumblr tags they have absolutely no business being near. A small rant incoming, you've been warned!...
Tumblr media
Did that set some alarm bells off in your head; do you think this isn't actually a woman and a lesbian? If "yes," you'd be right...
Tumblr media
It's a goddamn man, larping as something he can't possibly ever understand or be a part of (neither womanhood, nor same sex attraction).
And it gets better - after the pinned bio virtue signaling about how his blog gushes about women, and how that will always inherently include "trans women" and "nbwlw aligned people" or whatever the fuck; and how "transphobia" isn't cool - he throws in the anime gif, and the "MEN DNI" 😭
Can't forget the convoluted, terrible definition of "lesbian" that already excludes the dude himself.
Tumblr media
Um, buddy; YOU ARE THE CREEP.
I guess what dumbfounds me so much is how a human being can exist in such an enormously high level of cognitive dissonance, delusion, and denial of self. How does the brain maintain it? How has this male made an entire blog larping as something he is the absolute total opposite of, how does he write out things that inherently mean he isn't a part of it; how does he attempt to ward away others like himself while not realizing he's one of them (i.e, the creep comment.)
Yes, it does make you a creep to have sexual thoughts about women when you're a male and label them "lesbian" and try to force them and yourself into lesbian spaces. You can never understand gay/bi women's love and attraction for other women. It is so different from yours.
Anyway... I know there's a lot of these trans identified male "transbians" on here. I know it's nothing new. It just can't help but gross you out to see one in a lesbian tag projecting his fetishistic fantasies out as though they're coming from a gay woman. And the way so many people just smile and nod and let them get away with it relatively uncriticized. That's sad and nasty...such is the world in the age of gender ideology.
At least they make it easy for actual women to tell the larpers apart from us 🤦‍♀️rant over! Stay vigilant, ladies
77 notes · View notes
genderkoolaid · 2 years
Text
It's a benefit of being in a dominant group that your identity label is invisible. White culture is just "culture". Straight relationships are just "relationships". Cis gender is just "gender". Not only does it present the dominant group to be the standard, and everything else an aberration, but it allows the impact of dominance on these categories to go unnoticed, unquestioned and uncriticized.
This is why it is not helpful to be reductive when talking about men, maleness, masculinity, etc. Many times, we end up making cis, straight, monogender, white maleness the definition of maleness, with marginalized men being pushed to the aside as a variant of the Real Men. This goes hand-in-hand with gender/sex essentialism, as the issue of demonizing a whole caste of people based on something they cannot control which includes marginalized men is brushed aside, since the Real Men are the most powerful ones (sound familiar?).
And many times (thought not always), this happens both without actually examining the ways in which all of those identities combine to create the problems being talked about, and without providing marginalized men any space to provide their own critique of dominant manhood and the ways they have been affected by it. Trans men of color frequently have extremely interesting and important things to say on hegemonic masculinity and the ways in which race, genderqueerness, etc. are involved. But instead of being treated as people with valuable things to say on men, as well as people with the most direct experience, they have the diversity of their experience erased by (very frequently) cis white women, who then defend this erasure by saying
"Well I'm oppressed by men, so its my right to be essentialist! Asking me to reflect on the ways I cope when they are hurting other people is bad, actually.", or
"Well obviously I didn't mean you. In fact, its so obvious I never need to say it, or imply it, or address it, or reflect on why I use "men" as a general term even when I insist I know its not accurate."
#m.
335 notes · View notes
rainydayladybug · 6 months
Text
TME people on this site really love high-fiving over how much they’re willing to fuck trans women and how much they hate TERFs. And too often that’s the extent of their “allyship”. Trans women’s voices, struggles, and especially their criticisms of self-labelled “ally” behavior do not matter.
Because allyship for trans women apparently hinges on feeling comfortable (unchallenged + uncriticized), being thanked for tossing crumbs, riling TERFs up for fun while trans women endure the backlash, and shouting how horny you are in the most tone-deaf + objectifying ways.
27 notes · View notes
youre-only-gay-once · 2 years
Text
I think spn bloggers let bobo berens get away uncriticized for way more than they should just because he’s gay and let destiel go half canon
392 notes · View notes
edwad · 3 months
Note
i think there’s a secret third option you’re not considering where i actually agree with your critique of marx but don’t think the point of marx is to establish a self consistent general economic theory. so actually the opposite reading of what you said, viz., “he was just an economist”, but instead “he was mainly a political thinker/philosopher” and the main value of reading him is actually to see the dialectical materialist method of analysis applied in realtime (cont.)
(cont.) even if the results of that analysis are shaky/incomplete/inconsistent. if things started and ended with marx i’d agree with you that your critique poses a serious problem, and regardless i still think it’s worth wrestling with, but fortunately we have over a century of thinkers from countless stripes building on marx, each taking different things from their reading to build out new theories of capitalism/strategies of resisting it. we don’t actually need marx as much as some make out
well i think you've misunderstood my position a bit.
i am not saying we ought to read marx as an economist, i am saying that reading him as an economist is the bad reading we should be trying to avoid. but also, if the result of his efforts are in fact reducible to a very ambitious project which ultimately just generates a new economics, then that is one of his failures. i'm not saying this is a good thing or how i want to read him, it's just that this might be as far as his project got him. our job should be to go beyond that.
if anything, i get this from reading him basically as a "political thinker/philosopher" that is trying to make sense of the theoretical field of economics in a way which makes the system comprehensible. i don't know what the "dialectical materialist method of analysis" means to you, or how it could be "applied it in realtime" but im sure we'd disagree on the nature of his project from that alone without ever having to wonder whether i'm reading him as an economist or not. that entire string of words strikes me as wrong.
as for marx being the final word, i of course don't believe this. this is basically my entire point, and i obviously see myself as someone that belongs to this post-marx grouping of people. but that doesn't stop the marxist baggage from silently lingering, uncriticized. it also doesn't mean that these contributions are necessarily good, which is why every 20 seconds there is another call for a "return to marx". i'm focusing my efforts there because a few years ago i would've been one of those people.
7 notes · View notes
esther-dot · 1 year
Note
Hot take but Asha bores me. She’s another one of GRRM’s action girls where he can’t be bothered to give them flaws (unlikable, fatal flaws). She’s not at all some brand new and revolutionary character the way fandom hypes her up to be. She exhibits almost all the tropes you’d expect her to and is a pretty conventional character all things considered.
If she were truly any better than the other Ironborn in any kind of conventionally moral sense, none of them would have respected her. She’s clearly fine leading the Ironmen to rape, invade, and pillage up and down the coasts of Westeros. She completely absorbed the Ironborn lifestyle and loves it. She was complicit with the culture for years. It’s expected (justly and with good reason) for Theon to grapple with the horror and immorality of reaving, and his own role in it. But Asha kind of gets away with it. She contemplates its prudence and sustainability, but readers are never fully faced with the reality of what she does, and are arguably invited to see her as Supercool Kickass Feminist Warrior instead.
Me: my anons are clearly working as a group to get me kicked out of the fandom
Also me: Outrageous. I’ll be damned if I’m the slacker in this group project! 😂
I wasn't aware that Asha was that hyped! She seemed to be Martin's attempt to have someone of the culture be a little more reasonable/not as bloodthirsty
"And if I shout your name?" Harmund demanded. "What then?"
"Peace," said Asha. "Land. Victory. I'll give you Sea Dragon Point and the Stony Shore, black earth and tall trees and stones enough for every younger son to build a hall. We'll have the northmen too . . . as friends, to stand with us against the Iron Throne. Your choice is simple. Crown me, for peace and victory. Or crown my nuncle, for more war and more defeat." She sheathed her dirk again. "What will you have, ironmen?"
"VICTORY!" shouted Rodrik the Reader, his hands cupped about his mouth. "Victory, and Asha!" (AFFC, The Drowned Man)
so I think she's meant to be a nuance within the framework of the Ironborn, but I see what you're saying. Pointing out the practicality of something is not commentary on morality or a sign that she would be able to completely change things. You’re probably right that the kind of fantasy tropes she hits help her go uncriticized.
Now that I think about it though, the trope may be old, but she is written in an interesting way within the context of ASOIAF. Asha would pursue a practical peace where Dany can't quite manage, Asha has ambition that Sansa totally lacks, she does not have the romantic nature that both Sansa and Dany have, and she is certainly not as evil as Cersei, but some of her lines comment on sexism in a similar way. So she is potentially a way to round out the female POVs if we read it generously. She will never go as far as Dany or Cersei, she will never be as compassionate as Sansa.
I suppose more importantly, Asha has one of those lines that seem significant as far as understanding the war v peace struggle and where a character falls:
A throwing axe was in her hand. She tossed it in the air and caught it deftly. "Here is my husband, Nuncle. Any man who wants me should take it up with him." (AFFC, The Iron Captain)
Some time ago I wrote about this moment for Robb:
Again the shouting began. Catelyn sat despairing. She had come so close, she thought. They had almost listened, almost … but the moment was gone. There would be no peace, no chance to heal, no safety. She looked at her son, watched him as he listened to the lords debate, frowning, troubled, yet wedded to his war. He had pledged himself to marry a daughter of Walder Frey, but she saw his true bride plain before her now: the sword he had laid on the table." (AGOT Catelyn, XI)
Robb was undone by a series of choices, his own and others, but I think Martin is consistent and insistent on his anti war stance, and it is this moment that Robb's fate was sealed, the moment he chose the sword.
As sympathetic as we are to Robb's cause, we're clearly meant to have realized that Cat was right. (link)
and we have all pointed to Dany's "bride of fire" as a worrying sign. However, Bran is wed to the trees, so it is possible there will be later opportunities for each of the remaining characters to choose a path, and perhaps that will be the moment where Asha fully becomes aware of what they've been doing.
I was gonna just leave this ask there, but I skimmed some of her chapters again because I couldn’t remember them that well, and Robb is actually mentioned to support her plan for peace, so she’s an interesting blend of what Robb chose and Cat’s good instinct. This part also strikes me. She isn’t obsessed with the title, she wants power to achieve a certain end, one that’s presented as a good option compared to the others
Tumblr media
So, even if she isn’t reformed, we’re meant to see value in her stance. She also does have this moment which may be pointing to a change in her thinking, it at least indicates a certain awareness of what they’ve done
Tumblr media
and I thought this was a rather poignant moment that Martin could play forward.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
So, I agree with you that she’s presented as a sexy badass, and I’ll take your word for it that fandom doesn’t fully register her complicity in the crimes of the Ironborn, but there is, or at the very least, is the potential, for her story to grow in an interesting direction.
I understand your frustration though. It’s tiring to have every flaw of Sansa’s exaggerated until half the fandom is convinced she’s a murderess while the characters who do worse things are celebrated as feminist queens. 😐
27 notes · View notes
transfaabulous · 8 months
Text
Tumblr media
C A N N O T believe this post is being passed around uncriticized. Like even ignoring the fact that brendanicus is a known tankie and straight-up stands against Ukraine, please holy shit look at the (((parentheses))) this is a known Nazi dogwhistle
he is calling Zelenskyy a Nazi
he is calling all Ukrainians who support an independent Ukraine Nazis
he is regurgitating Ruzzian propaganda that justifies the invasion as fucking denazification
HE IS CALLING UKRAINIANS, WHO ARE ACTIVELY RESISTING GENOCIDE, NAZIS SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE THEY ARE RESISTING GENOCIDE.
THIS IS EXACTLY RUZZIAN PROPAGANDA. LITERALLY WORD FOR WORD POINT FOR POINT THIS IS PROPAGANDA IN FAVOR OF THE PEOPLE COMMITTING A GENOCIDE.
PLEASE.
If anyone wants a more thorough breakdown of what exactly the propaganda here is lmk and I'll get to it when I'm not too sick to know if I'm making sense or not
14 notes · View notes
sonia-marmeladova · 9 months
Text
You know consumerism, capitalism, and wealth are the idols of our era because they live as uncriticized gods unconscious in the minds of even very good Christians who demonstrate instinctive devotion to said idols when you suggest, even just gently, that something like capitalism is harmful. Among the faithful, free market capitalism is embraced as basic and unquestioned as some religious beliefs. “The eye of a needle is actually a gate in Jerusalem” “Almsgiving is the same thing as being spiritually generous in your heart” “Usury is just exorbitant interest” “Giving to the poor is spiritually good for some people but it’s just not my spirituality”
14 notes · View notes
hopeless-eccentric · 1 year
Text
so eowyn huh.
my blistering take is that her ending sucks a hell of a lot less than a lot of people think it does, especially when you peel back some of the layers
first and foremost, eowyn was raised in rohan, a staunch warrior culture which, while explored with a certain amount of open mindedness, does not go uncriticized for that! never forget that lotr is incredibly anti-war for a war book. tolkien’s “wisdom mouthpiece characters” such as gandalf and faramir often treat societal emphasis on war as a lamentable (if not slightly necessary due to the whole Mordor issue) “fall” from a former golden age of wisdom and emphasis on arts and culture. this kind of cultural mindset (which is also somewhat established in gondor) is often associated with barrenness and decay/decline (fun fact, this is why a lot of powerful warrior characters such as boromir and earnur never marry or have children). basically, the audience is supposed to see these patriarchal, warlike societies as byproducts of the war with Mordor, but nasty ones nonetheless
so back to eowyn!
what she wants more than anything else is to be treated with basic human respect and decency. in a society that 1) views war as masculine and 2) values war above anything else, there is basically no way to get that respect and decency while being a woman. the fact that she feels the need to ride to war and die for her country just to be treated like a person is fully intended to be a tragedy and an indication of the flaws of rohirric society. (caveat: this isn’t the only reason she rides to war. but even if there are multiple reasons, it shouldnt be any of them!)
there’s also the whole issue with gender and heroism. in the foundational tolkien studies paper “the feminine principle in tolkien” by melanie rawls (please check it out my god it’s fascinating, if you can’t find a copy dm me!) suggests that ultimate heroism/wholeness in lotr and adjacent works is often androgynous, and that heroic characters who lean masculine or feminine will seek balance by either 1) taking on the other gender’s traits/roles or 2) surrounding themselves with an opposing influencing person (think legolas and gimli becoming more heroic as they become better friends and balance each other out)
in eowyn’s case, she’s naturally a little on the masculine side, which means the strictly gendered roles of society aren’t just illogical and unfair, but uncomfortable and limiting. she isn’t fully masculine, so her time as dernhelm feels false and incomplete, but the roles designated to women are also limiting and treated without respect
this is all a big part of why she ends up with someone very feminine. in a lot of ways, faramir provides the balance she’s lacked both within herself and her society
another thing faramir brings to the table is an outside cultural perspective, especially with his negative opinions of war and warrior culture. that balance he brings is a lot more than symbolic. he suggests that while her feats of arms are respectable, she still deserved respect before she killed the witch king. she always has! 
and it’s this idea and their few weeks of conversation that begin to break down the patriarchal warrior culture stuff she had ingrained. she doesn’t have to be masculine to be treated well, but she can be if she wants. she also can be feminine in a way where she isn’t treated poorly for it, which is, in my opinion, why she opts to become a healer. not only does healing symbolically oppose rohan’s warrior culture, but it’s a specifically feminine trait (according to Rawls). however, what’s important is that she chooses it as a way of purposefully finding balance and wholeness in her life (cycling back to the androgynous balance theory) by evening out her “naturally masculine” nature with CHOSEN feminine influences and pastimes
long story short, eowyn wants to be feminine, she just also wants to be respected and treated with decency. choosing to marry faramir and become a healer is indicative of her finally getting a chance to do that in a way that she wants without being treated poorly, disrespected, or reducing herself as a person, and i think that’s pretty baller
65 notes · View notes
warsofasoiaf · 10 months
Note
Did I miss something about Bernie and gay grooming? Or perhaps I misunderstood what you were saying?
I rewrote that sentence.
For clarity, the Bernie thing is in relation to Daniel Ortega. When the Miskito and Rana people were unwilling to turn over their land to the Nicaraguan government, Ortega unleashed a campaign of bombings and shootings, a policy which is still ongoing as business interests frequently encroach on timber resources and mineral deposits. Sanders continued to raise money for Ortega, and when opposition press published what Ortega was doing, Sanders angrily cut off reporters and compared the opposition press to Nazi newspapers publishing articles on how to kill Jewish people. To Sanders, anti-Native American policies are exclusively an opposition thing. He largely goes uncriticized for his support on this, because for the vast majority of Americans, Native Americans don't exist outside of the United States and Canada.
Sorry for the confusion, Publius.
SomethingLikeALawyer, Hand of the King
14 notes · View notes
mysticdragon3md3 · 6 months
Text
youtube
Misogynists who hide behind "respecting other cultures" or Westerners who "love Asian media/anime" because "it's not political", are going to have a fit.😂 Stop using us as an excuse to go uncriticized for your misogyny. Asian people want human rights too.
The whole reason my dad's family sent him to America, was because he was protesting for rights so much in his home country, they thought he was going to get killed. And he almost did. Weirdos who talk like advocating for human rights for people in Asian countries is just "imposing Western culture", just want their bigotry to go uncriticized.💢
3 notes · View notes