#that will not affect the voters you don’t have yet | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

shady-swan-jones · 9 months

Text

A Good Wife No More - a captain swan Modern AU

Ao3, Wattpad

Summary: Killian hasn't seen Emma since law school, when she broke his heart and left to marry another man. Now she's asking for a chance in practising law, when all her wants is to know why she left then.

a Good Wife inspired modern AU

(1/5)

The soft morning light from his office window dances against her hair, tenderly casting her profile in a warm glow, as the rays finally settle on her hand.

Correction, his haunted mind unhelpfully supplies. Her ringed hand.

When asked about his biggest regret by prying colleagues at happy hour, usually trying to fish sex-stories-gone-wrong from him, Killian always says Tink. An affair with a perky paralegal inadvertently resulting in his firing makes for a convincing tale of failure.

Yet no amount of work-related downfalls, as savage as they may be, can compare to the real thing. In a surprising turn of events, his biggest regret is a captivating mix of nerves and fearlessness.

And she’s sitting right in front of him. Emma

-/-

“Killian, stop! I’m going. It’s my decision and it’s final.”

Emma is shivering under her worn out red leather jacket. He doesn’t have a mind to appreciate the sight though, not with her casually mentioning she’s abandoning her career. Abandoning it before it even has a chance to start and following her prick of a boyfriend to Chicago right after graduation.

She’s leaving.

“Love, deny it all you want, but you’re an open book to me. Neal’s forcing you to follow him in his ridiculous quest to be the Wolf of Wall Street. You love the law. You’ve had a taste of it here. I have seen your eyes sparkle when you’re facing me in mock trials. You’re passionate. You’re bloody brilliant!”

He paused his desperate, last-chance speech to look her in the eye. His voice caught in his throat.

“Don’t abandon this, Swan.”

Don’t abandon me.

-/-

The next time he saw her was through a screen. She was standing tall, offering her support to people who didn’t deserve it. Robert Gold’s half-assed apology to his voters, essentially for having no soul and dignity, captured everyone’s attention in the office.

Emma captured his.

She was behind her father-in-law, as beautiful as he’d often dreamed, even though no amount of makeup could hide the pair of shining, red-rimmed eyes.

-/-

“I knew you’d find me, Swan.”

“Shut up, Jones.”

The roll of her eyes is another thing he missed about her.

“That’s Jones Esq to you, darling,” he supplies playfully, and fixes a smile on his face.

She doesn’t need to know how fast his heart is beating. How the gold tresses framing her face, make his fingers itch to tuck a lock behind her ear or how the sight of her, after all these years, is an image that will be permanently stitched on his brain.

But, she’s in his law firm after all. Which brings up the obvious question.

“What are you doing in my conference room? Not that I’m complaining to see an old friend,” the word friend bitter on his tongue as he forces it out, “but-”

“I’m here for the job, Jones.”

He goes to protest but she cuts him off expertly, “not for the pleasure of your company.”

Killian pouts and prays to an invisible god it affects her just a tad.

“Let’s get this over with so we can go to the part where you hire me, and I get an office. With a view.”

-/-

She won’t get an office, of course. First-year associates get a legal pad and a box of pens with the firm’s initials. His initials among them.

He selfishly thinks of her tracing his name with her fingers while she works.

-/-

Killian Jones doesn’t hire people on the spot. So he makes a great show of listening to all her reasons why she will be a valuable asset to his team. As though he hadn’t made up his mind the moment he saw her sitting nervously on the chair, touching the stem of her wrist tattoo.

He doesn’t need to hear why he should give her the job. Every scandal in the world couldn’t tarnish the image he has of her from their earlier days in college. “You bested me, Swan,” was his graceful admit of defeat when the professor paired them opposing each other for the mock trial. He’d lost the case to her, but it hadn’t felt like a loss at all.

He knows she has fought for everything she has in life -from the orphanage to Columbia Law School-, and this will be no different. Opposing counsel doesn’t stand a chance. Yet, he lets her speak, passionately and -dare he hope- a little flustered.

They avoid, masterfully, any heavy topics that could lead this reunion to rocky paths. They don’t talk about Gold or Neal but there is a brief mention of Henry, where he enjoys Emma’s genuine smile. Her first one this morning.

He tells himself he has all the time in the world now to learn her again. She’s here.

As Emma stands to leave, never one for pleasantries despite the political chaos she lives in, he braces himself and stops her. The flicker of hope in his heart matches the one in her eyes.

“Emma,” he breathes. “You should know, not a day went by that I didn’t think of you.”

She pauses. Her hand settles the loose strand of hair he had itched to touch, as her diamond ring catches the light painfully.

“Good.”

#cs ff #cs au #cs fic rec #captain swan #killian jones #emma swan #cs fanfic #ouat #once upon a time

21 notes · View notes

mostlysignssomeportents · 2 years

Text

The oligarchs' Supreme Court

Here’s something weird: in the wake of Roe v Wade in the 1970s, the Southern Baptist Convention repeatedly passed resolutions affirming the right to abortion and rejecting government interference in the decision to bear a child to term:

https://text.npr.org/734303135

Back then, white evangelicals were deeply suspicious of people who opposed abortion. Getting too worked up about the issue was a sign of crypto-papacy, and back then, white evangelicals hated Catholics:

https://doctorow.medium.com/schizmogenesis-755bbb6a8515

The weirdest thing about this is that today, white evangelicals will vote for anyone who promise to end abortion — even a philandering, foul-mouthed, unprincipled habitual liar and likely atheist. They are single-issue voters — whose single issue is something that, in living memory, they actually opposed.

They’ll vote for politicians like Scott Dejarlais, the GOP congressghoul from Tennessee who was re-elected three times. Dejarlais, an MD, impregnated one of his patients, then coerced her into getting an abortion. He also coerced his ex-wife into getting two abortions. But he reliably voted to ban abortion:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/05/16/congressman-who-advised-ex-wife-to-seek-abortion-votes-for-late-term-abortion-ban/

Dejarlais “received a 100% score by the National Right to Life Committee.”

If you’ve seen the polling on abortion, you know that these single-issue voters are in a tiny and generally unimportant minority. Americans overwhelmingly support the right to get an abortion. And yet, here we are. Obviously, America is a nation founded on antimajoritarian principles, whose Constitution is designed to let rural, southern gentry steer the nation, but is it really that antimajoritarian?

Not really. The GOP is a coalition of single-issue voters, and substantial numbers of the GOP base are actually pretty cool with abortion — they’re pursuing other single issues, and they’re willing to give up abortion in exchange for progress on their pet issues.

Another critical bloc in the GOP coalition is people with low-tax brain-worms, including many self-described “libertarians,” who will vote for unlimited authoritarianism and state intrusion into the most private realm of (other) people’s lives, provided that they save at least 25 cents on their tax bill as a result:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/09/29/jubilance/#tolerable-racism

These two blocs, along with racists, homophobes and transphobes, provide the bulk for the master strategists of the GOP, people who aren’t merely elitists, but actual elites. By definition, elite politics can’t win majorities on its own, because elites are always in the minority — that’s what “elite” means.

The cruelty isn’t the point. The cruelty is a means to an end. The cruelty is how you mobilize useful idiots to turn out to the polls and vote for the vast expansion of the wealth of a tiny number of people. The cruelty is how you get the turkeys to vote for Christmas:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/03/09/turkeys-voting-for-christmas/#culture-wars

An oft-repeated truism about abortion restrictions is that they don’t affect wealthy people who can afford to miss work and travel out of state. Some argue with this, pointing out that being merely wealthy won’t save you if you need an emergency D&C after a miscarriage, say.

https://www.texastribune.org/2022/06/24/texas-abortion-costs/

That’s true as far as it goes, but there’s a group of people for whom this is much less true: the ultra-rich, the 1% and (especially) the 0.1%. These are people whose wealth allows them to bend reality — to charter private jets, or to have private doctors fly to them on private jets. People who have their names on hospital wings.

The defining characteristic of these people is impunity, the power to do as they like without consequence, to bypass the rules, laws and challenges of the rest of us. These are the people building luxury bunkers in New Zealand and whose only concern about civilizational collapse is the logistics of coercing their private goons in the Great After:

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jul/23/tech-industry-wealth-futurism-transhumanism-singularity

Dobbs, the case that overturned Roe v Wade, was decided by an illegitimate court whose appointees were nominated and confirmed by politicians who lost the popular election. The illegitimate Supremes are the apex of a vast cohort of federal judges who were likewise appointed by politicians who lost the popular vote:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/12/02/minoritarian-third-supreme-court/

These judges have emitted a steady stream of unhinged and cruel decisions on culture-war issues, and these have real, human consequences. But it’s a mistake to assume that the reason that billionaires put so much energy into getting these judges appointed was to strike down New York’s concealed carry law. That was — again — a means to an end, a way to get turkeys to vote for Christmas (there are a lot of musket-fucking single-issue ammosexual voters who will vote for anyone who makes it easier to get guns).

The reasons so much money was poured into the elections that resulted in these judges’ lifetime appointments to the federal bench were economic, not cultural. These are judges who will reliably rule in corporations’ favor, whether they have maimed their workers, poisoned our planet, price-gouged the public, or killed us with unsafe products. They will wave through mergers that the FTC or DOJ have blocked. They will make extremely rich people much richer.

These judges will put Black and poor people in jail, sure — and that will make the Christmas-voting turkeys happy. But just as importantly, they’ll let millionaires escape consequences, no matter how heinous their crimes.

Whether it’s getting drunk and mowing down four people:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/affluenza-case-ethan-couch-who-killed-4-in-dui-wreck-set-for-release/

Or raping a teenager:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/04/us/brock-turner-rape-victim-chanel-miller-book-emily-doe/index.html

Or hell, raping a baby:

https://time.com/43626/wealthy-child-rapist-jail-delaware/

The cruelty isn’t the point, power is: the power to use other people in cruel ways, to be sure, but also the power to float above other people’s pain, sorrow and concern. The rich dream of a world where “personal responsibility” is code for “total lack of empathy.”

Subverting the legislature and the judiciary is an iterative process: first you buy some politicians who pass favorable laws and appoint favorable judges; then those judges rule in your favor when those laws are called into question. That makes you richer, which lets you buy more politicians, who pass more laws and appoint more judges.

As Bill Clinton — who used his strong majority in both chambers of Congress to get NAFTA passed, smashing unions, but not to turn the right to an abortion into a federal law — liked to remind us: “It’s the economy, stupid.”

The stupid economy just keeps getting stupider. The rich have gotten so much richer and each surging transfer of wealth from our teeming millions to their board-room handful has been attended by more political power for America’s oligarchs.

The iterative buy-laws-buy-judges-buy-judgements process crossed an important threshold in 2010, when ultrawealthy backers secured their Citizens United SCOTUS decision, which freed them up to make unlimited, secret campaign contributions to politicians who would make them richer and thus able to buy more politicians.

Citizens United was key to the election of the politicians who gave us the illegitimate Supreme Court who, in turn, gave us the Dobbs decision and despite the prominence of Dobbs in our national discourse (and its importance to pregnant people and the children they are forced to bear), there’s plenty that SCOTUS is doing that is equally terrifying. The Supreme Court of Oligarchs is primarily concerned with elite impunity and power, not cruelty — the cruelty is merely the means, power is the end.

One extremely relatable way of understanding elite impunity is the tax evasion of the ultra-rich. A year ago, Propublica began reporting on the IRS Files, leaks detailing the tax strategies of the 0.1%.

https://pluralistic.net/2021/06/15/guillotines-and-taxes/#carried-interest

The oligarchs whose finances were thus exposed are all heavy political spenders. Unsurprisingly, they lobbied hard for tax breaks in the Trump tax bill, and received incredibly specific tax loopholes that applied to just one or two very rich donors. Bechtel spent $1m getting one such loophole, and netted $111m in return — a shrewd investment indeed:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/08/11/the-canada-variant/#shitty-man-of-history-theory

The most revolting GOP politicians — the ones who are forever in the news for their authoritarianism and bigotry — have been showered with money by billionaires, including self-styled “progressives.” These billionaires are the true single-issue voters, because their single issue is themselves:

https://observer.com/2021/02/elon-musk-spacex-gave-119k-to-republicans-who-opposed-biden-win-after-capitol-riot/

Many of these high-rolling donors got rich by being born rich, and boy do they hate inheritance tax. They argue that the ability to steer our whole society — to steer our ecosystem off a planetary cliff — should be allocated on the basis of whether you emerged from a very lucky orifice:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/06/19/dynastic-wealth/#caste

The tax-evasion tactics that Propublica documented over the past year are eye-glazingly complex, and if you do manage to figure out how they work, you realize that they are idiots’ fictions. That’s true for Peter Theil’s $5 billion tax-free ROTH:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/06/26/wax-rothful/#thiels-gambit

And for the Real Estate Investment trusts that have “hollowed out” hotels and smashed their unions:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/03/01/reit-modernization-act/#reit-makes-might

For the sports teams whose billionaire owners pay no tax on a torrent of money, even as their players cough up their share:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/07/08/tuyul-apps/#economic-substance-doctrine

Or whose hobbies — playing with the horsey set, say, or “ranches” — can yield hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of tax avoidance.

https://pluralistic.net/2021/12/08/required-ish-reading/#hobby-lobby-ists

In fact, there are ten major tactics that American oligarchs use to escape the taxes that everyone else has to pay, allowing them to retain more cash that they can use to buy more impunity, provided that they keep up the culture-war side-hustles that get useful idiots out to the polls.

https://www.propublica.org/article/billionaires-tax-avoidance-techniques-irs-files

The Ultra Wealth Effect (borrowing against vast asset wealth) https://www.propublica.org/article/the-secret-irs-files-trove-of-never-before-seen-records-reveal-how-the-wealthiest-avoid-income-tax

Peter Thiel’s $5 Billion IRA https://www.propublica.org/article/lord-of-the-roths-how-tech-mogul-peter-thiel-turned-a-retirement-account-for-the-middle-class-into-a-5-billion-dollar-tax-free-piggy-bank

Turning High-Tax-Rate Trading into Low-Tax-Rate Income https://www.propublica.org/article/jeff-yass-susquehanna-tiktok-tax-avoidance

The Magic of Sports Ownership: Make Money While (Legally) Reporting Losses https://www.propublica.org/article/the-billionaire-playbook-how-sports-owners-use-their-teams-to-avoid-millions-in-taxes

Build, Drill and Save: The Real Estate and Oil Businesses Can Both Be Tax Havens https://www.propublica.org/article/these-real-estate-and-oil-tycoons-used-paper-losses-to-avoid-paying-taxes-for-years

Even a Billionaire’s Hobbies Can Pay Off at Tax Time https://www.propublica.org/article/when-youre-a-billionaire-your-hobbies-can-slash-your-tax-bill

Think Your Taxes are Too High? Change the Tax Laws ttps://www.propublica.org/article/secret-irs-files-reveal-how-much-the-ultrawealthy-gained-by-shaping-trumps-big-beautiful-tax-cut

Why Tech Billionaires Pay Less Than Hedge-Fund Managers https://projects.propublica.org/americas-highest-incomes-and-taxes-revealed/

Brother, Can You Spare a Stimulus Check? https://www.propublica.org/article/these-billionaires-received-taxpayer-funded-stimulus-checks-during-the-pandemic

Trust This: How Wealthy Families Pass Billions to Heirs While Avoiding Taxes https://www.propublica.org/article/more-than-half-of-americas-100-richest-people-exploit-special-trusts-to-avoid-estate-taxes

It’s sometimes said that GOP politicians fear their base, but it’s truer to say that their fear their bases. They understand that the culture-war cruelty is the key to keeping the billionaire money-taps flowing, and vice versa. Politicians who lose elections also lose their dark money.

Dem politicians, on the other hand, are not afraid of their base. They understand that having an openly anti-democratic, racist, homophobic, misogynist christofascist opposition means that they can rely on voters turning out for them no matter what:

https://www.levernews.com/it-is-time-for-dems-to-fear-their-own-voters/

It’s why they’ll go with their donors to back anti-abortion politicians in primary races, even as they’re publicly vowing to protect abortion rights:

https://www.newsweek.com/nancy-pelosi-supports-anti-abortion-candidate-despite-roe-v-wade-outcry-1708557

We have to realize that the culture war is downstream from oligarchs’ bid for wealth, which they can turn into power, which they can turn into impunity. Lots of oligarchs are bigots of one stripe or another, but even when they aren’t, they are still pro-bigotry, because bigotry is how they secure power.

[Image ID: A flaming dumpster set in a hellscape excerpted from Bosch's 'Garden of Earthly Delights,' filled with bewigged judges in robes, all pointing angry fingers.]

64 notes · View notes

fangan-milgram · 9 months

Note

Hi hello as someone who has had a fangan hyperfixation since 2018 and is also getting into Milgram I absolutely love this so much !! If you have any spoiler-free information about this project I would love to know as much as possible ! /nf

hi !! sorry for not responding for a while. I’m very glad you’re interested- I thought it was kind of a weird and embarrassing idea at first so I was nervous to make it public. it makes me feel a bit better that people do like the concept

I don’t want to clog up people’s dashboards or anything with a text wall, so I’ll put a cut with some infodumps under it if you’re interested.

for information about the project I can give, it’s a one man project so output may be slow. there are 10 prisoners like canon milgram, 5 males and 5 females. rather than as songs and videos, the crimes will likely be presented as either poems or written stories coupled with drawings

some of the crimes may reflect some canon events and include other canon characters, while others were made up for the sake of the story based on what type of murder I think each character would commit. this will also include some headcanons and speculation about characters that haven’t been fully fleshed out yet from fangans that are incomplete, so if I end up getting something wrong when more things are revealed about the characters, I ask everyone not to come attack me, since this story was in the works even before a certain reveal in a certain video series fangan that shook the fangan community to its core happened. you know the one.

also, for some beta fun facts! there were originally 12 prisoners. Ace from Despair Time and Grace from Eden’s Garden were those prisoners, but I decided to remove them to relieve extra work + to not reuse fangans - since, we already have Damon as Prisoner 001 and David as Prisoner 009.

also, the Warden was originally going to be Tsurugi Kinjo from DRA. however… I sort of realized Tsurugi would just want all the prisoners to get a death sentence, so… I went with Kaizue instead, since I think having a Warden that enjoys what they’re doing rather than just doing it as a moral obligation like Es would be interesting.

I’m not sure how much more I can talk about without getting into spoiler territory, but, for each of the little black and white drawings I’m steadily pumping out, it reveals that each duo has a set of contrasting themes that represent each of them. I’ll list them below, and you can make your own interpretations of what exactly they mean for the characters.

- Loathing (001) / Loving (002)

- Delusion (003) / Discovery (004)

- Repress (005) / Recall (006)

- Refuge (007) / Retaliation (008)

- Anxiety (009) / Apathy (010)

that’s all.

though, as a fun tip for anyone else who wants to write a MILGRAM story… make sure that both an INNOCENT and GUILTY verdict will in some way affect the prisoner receiving it in a negative way for Trial 2. your goal is to push the idea of consequence when it comes to verdicts, and help your voters use critical thinking and speculation to figure out what could happen. and especially the idea that there isn’t always a “correct” answer, as MILGRAM’s popularity derives from debates and discussions between users about their own interpretations and ideas about what would be better

have a good one ★ I’ll try not to disappoint with this project. once again, I’m very glad you’re interested !!

#fangan chronicles ask

6 notes · View notes

allinmycorner · 2 years

Photo

It was Michael Buble week on Dancing With the Stars! He opened the show with a performance of "Sway" and then also sang "Higher" while Derek, his fiancée Hayley and the pros danced to the song about halfway through the show. He also joined the judging panel, so all the scores were out of 50 this week.

(I lost points on my DWTS fantasy game as I predicted a couple would dance to "Just Haven't Met You Yet." No one danced to it. What gives, show?)

Anyway, did Michael Buble bring our contestants luck or not? Let's find out!

Jessie and Alan: Apparently Jessie's fans have been telling her she's been dancing the salsa on TikTok for years so she hoped she would easily pick up the song. She still struggled but I thought her salsa to "Come Dance With Me" was one of her best. The judges kinda agreed but unfortunately the voters didn't. Jessie at least saw a silver lining in her elimination - she could take her children trick or treating on Halloween. And I think she can hold her head high. She was the Prom Queen and went out on a good routine.

Charli and Mark: Charli was back on top with her foxtrot to "Fever." Though she struggled to be sensual in rehearsals, she delivered where it mattered and steamed up the dance floor with Mark. She looked like a professional dancer, which could work against her with some fans but I think they won't affect her too much.

Gabby and Val: Val called in some help this week. Jenna came to rehearsals to help Gabby get in touch with her sensual side and to give permission for Gabby to be sexy with Val. It was nice seeing Jenna again and her baby bump! Jenna's lessons seemed to work as Gabby was a bit more relaxed while dancing the rumba to "Home" with Val. But I still want to see a little more heart in her routines. They still feel more technical than emotional.

Heidi and Artem: Heidi's samba to "It Had Better Be Tonight (Meglio stasera)" was good, though it didn't surpass Wayne's from last time. But she certainly bounced back from being in the bottom two to once again be competition for her daughter. She just needs to hold onto this momentum and hopefully not end up in the bottom two again.

Shangela and Gleb: Shangela continues to make her mark on the ballroom while pulling away from the pack. Her tango to "Hollywood" exuded old Hollywood elegance and style. She is putting in the work to get better and rightfully declared herself the dark horse. And she did that tango with fried chicken tucked into her dress! Impressive.

Wayne and Witney: Wayne fell from the top of the leaderboard! He was sick during the week - but it was not COVID. Based on what he said, it sounds like exhaustion led him vulnerable to a classic stomach bug. So he and Witney lost valuable rehearsal time. But the fact that even without as much rehearsal time Wayne still ended up in the middle of the leaderboard shows how talented and dedicated he is. His quickstep to "I Get a Kick Out of You" wasn't his best but it was just a blip on his DWTS journey. And fan Michael Buble still gave him a 10 so there's that.

Jordin and Brandon: Jordin and Brandon continue to be a steady couple and their foxtrot to "You Make Me Feel So Young." The story of how Jordin would dance with her grandfather to this song in her kitchen was so sweet and it was clear that emotion propelled her dance. The judges are right that she has some technical things to work on but she could break away from the pack once she improves those.

Daniel and Britt: Daniel bounced back after a not-so-great week with a nice foxtrot to "Feeling Good." Britt decided to share the lyrics with him so he understood the song better and that seemed to help him connect with it. It definitely moved Carrie Ann and she couldn't stop praising him.

Trevor and Emma: Trevor looked absolutely dashing as he danced the foxtrot to "Come Fly With Me." And thankfully he survived a second trip to the bottom two though I don't think he deserved to be there. He keeps getting better and could win it all as the male dark horse. So thank you to the judges for saving him. Again.

Vinny and Koko: Look, I get why Vinny gets votes. He's likeable and he is fun to watch. But I'm starting to reach my point where I don't know if his fun and genuine packages/interviews can outweigh the fact that more talented dancers are landing in the bottom two over him and Koko. His cha-cha to "Save the Last Dance" was good but still worlds away from the other competitors - and not in a good way. As we get closer to the end, I am starting to worry that we may have another Bobby Bones situation on our hand and I'm not sure we can handle another one of those.

So that was Michael Buble night! Next time, it's everyone's second favorite episode after Disney Night - Halloween!

See you then!

#dancing with the stars #season 31 #jessie james decker #alan bersten

4 notes · View notes

darkwood-sleddog · 2 years

Text

You know growing up and starting out in one’s career a lot of emphasis is placed on how you need to dress a certain way to achieve your goals and not show your tattoos, don’t have piercings or alternative hair in any way and yet…speaking as an elected person you can literally wear whatever you want as an elected person. I’m wearing denim wide leg cargo pants and a septum piercing in my office as we speak.

The only people that can stop you are the voters. Like I’m bored of political fashion. Trump could’ve worn a miku binder Jefferson t shirt. Obama could’ve had full tattoo sleeves and it would have zero affect on their politics. I beg you to think about this.

When the highest office in the country can wear whatever the fuck they want we can lighten up on dress norms ffs. Conservatives can cry all they want about the color of one’s suit because they aim to suppress anything other than what they narrowly deem as normal and it’s upsetting to them that voters? They literally don’t care what you wear. At all. All those lies society told you about wearing an uncomfortable suit doesn’t matter at all. Dress codes be fake as hell.

Now personally I think we (elected people) should dress solely like guy fieri but that’s another essay in itself.

#not dogs #fashion #politics #I guess ?#anyways John fetterman be doing it good and I appreciate it #we need like…a judging portion on political fashion #if it’s not like Elton John weird I dun want it #sorry I really like the pants I’m wearing today #and I feel unhinged thinking about how #I once got told off while working at a fucking marketing company #on an art team #for wearing skinny jeans

17 notes · View notes

cherienymphe · 2 years

Note

bro omg that anon literally pissed me off so much and proved exactly my point in my ask! we KNOW! we know that the US is a shit show, they don’t need to tell us when we’re living in it!!

and what makes me angry is that they keep speaking on shit they know absolutely NOTHING! about!!! it’s literally not our fault that roe v wade was overturned!!! it’s the fact that we have a fucked up system. it’s not democracy. it’s not just about “voting for the right people”. it’s the fact that we’ve had five presidents in our history, 2 of which are modern day win the presidency while still losing the popular vote. the presidents are the ones who select members of SCOTUS. and not to mention obama literally TRIED to nominate a democratic justice but was blocked by republicans before he could ever do so.

not to mention, SO. MANY. PEOPLE. VOTE. yet still, people will vote for the republican candidate and it all just comes down to demographics and locations. majority of voters in florida are republican and that’s WHY they have republicans like desantis in office. i can guarantee you that there are tons of people living in florida that hate him and his policies. that’s what gets me pissed off because people do vote.

and america has been horrible from the get go. it’s never been great unless you were a rich cishet white man. so idk where you got that “the past 8 years has disproved the fact that america is the greatest country in the world” from

and like i said, it’s weird to dunk on people for problems that you already have. no country truly is perfect, so when your country is running rampant with racism and corrupt governments, i really don’t think it’s your place to be talking shit on other countries that have those problems too. unless one country’s actions are directly affecting yours, i would suggest not talking on those matters and getting mad at its countries citizens for things that are out of their control.

All of this plus the whole "past 8 years" thing made me laugh. 8 years? It's sucked forever. Did they think the black panthers were in the streets because of gas prices or...?

#asks

4 notes · View notes

accardi1921 · 9 months

Note

Please don’t publish this as i try my best to not get political on here but to add to your voting post, while there are still questions, of course, there are two other things that happened in 2020 that conservatives forget to address while getting bogged down by the fraud concerns. There’s always some fraud (in LA if you vote in person they just ask your name and address and usher you in, it’s crazy) but they didn’t even need it to be widespread enough to affect the outcome when what they did was pick a few key swing states (like PA) and changed the voting laws illegally (without legislature approval, they did it by executive order) to “allow” for universal mail in voting, extended voting, late counting of ballots received after the date, etc. Especially universal “everyone gets mailed a ballot” style mail in voting benefits dems because statistically dems live in cities so it’s easy to go door to door, ask the person (who maybe wouldn’t have voted at all otherwise) if they mailed their ballot, show them how to fill in one bubble and sign it and then take it for them to the Dropbox - this happens like crazy in big cities, I was shocked. You get a ton of ballots in apartment buildings like that, while conservatives usually live more rurally so it’s not as feasible to mount that kind of operation. Also in PA for example, they illegally changed the voting laws to allow this, people sued because there was no legislature approval, the judge said before the election they couldn’t do anything because nothing bad had happened yet, then after the election when a lawsuit was filed again the judge threw it out because the election already happened and “what could we do about it now?” It’s all bs, but couple the last-minute changes in voting procedures in swing states with just how many people voted against trump and not necessarily for Biden, I’m not convinced they’d even have needed widespread fraud to pull it off. I’m more worried about the voting machine company guy who was arrested a few days ago for sending the data to China. Anyways. Sorry to blow up your inbox, I do try to avoid politics for obvious reasons but this is one thing that I think could actually help conservatives, if we’d not just focus on fraud and instead divert some energy to pressuring local and state reps to return voting to pre 2020 procedures. No no-excuse voting by mail, voter ID, one Election Day not an election month that we have in LA, no unattended drop boxes, etc. Hope you have a great Saturday! One month to the primaries! I’m hoping like crazy Kari Lake and Doug Mastriano get the governorships in AZ and PA. Desantis needs a couple more bold conservatives to help him blaze the trail.

California is a lost cause & I've lived here 32 years. Two seconds after the polls close, they call it for the Demorats! Lived her long enough to expect it & one of many reasons we are leaving come retirement. Voting has become such a shambles & we know who to thank for that. None of this would be happening if there wasn't something to hide. The Demorats(who really aren't,more like Marxists)hate Trump because he's not from their wheelhouse. He doesn't need lobbiests money & he's not a career politician like many on both sides. I agree,no early voting, and California is notorious for it. Trumps won the primary already, in my opinion. De Santis made a tactical error. He should have focused on Gov of Florida as he was voted in,supported Trump & and went for 2028 presidential nomination. The voting machines are compromised, and as we saw in Arizona, nothing was done about it. We all know Kari Lake won that election in a landslide. If it comes down to stealing the vote again,we need another 1776! It may be violent because the colonists learned very quickly that unless that happened,nothing was going to change. One thing I always remember, the second largest army in this country, are American gun owners.

1 note · View note

autunimediapolitics · 2 years

Text

The point of view expressed by this social media text is funny, and ironic, yet it is ultimately the truth in every sense. The text states ““I don’t do politics” Well baby, politics is going to do you, regardless.” This is commenting on many factors in our society including people who don’t vote as they believe “it won’t make a difference, so why bother?”, people who also believe that not picking a side means that they are uninvolved in politics when not being involved is essentially the same as picking sides for many cases, and how ultimately no one wins in democratic politics. The first point this brings up is in reference to people who do not vote, they may have their reasons for not doing so yet they still choose to not fulfill their civic duty of voting. They may think that they can’t make a difference so what’s the point, or they don’t find a candidate that represents them so why vote for someone? This is what leads to in the United States of America, a recently 62% voter turnout, with almost eighty million people not voting, this is the highest it has been in recent years too. In 1996 less than half of all eligible voters did vote, there are many reasons for the low turnout, but a very common link is the fact that people believe that nothing really changes even if they do vote. According to NPR, 53% of non-voters in the United States believed that "It makes no difference who is elected president – things go on just as they did before." This has nothing to do with them not being able to vote, however, this is also a problem with three-quarters of this demographic saying they don’t believe it’s difficult to vote this is a very common sentiment that their vote means essentially nothing in the face of America and democracy so to them, because regardless of if they do politics or not, politics does them. The second point this brings about is the illusion of being uninvolved if you don’t choose a side, this logic is a very naïve point of view and is typically held by those with the ability to not care about politics as they benefit from society regardless, straight white men are typically the biggest perpetrators of this as if they are able-bodied individuals and are able to work then whoever is in charge and is running a country, it does not affect them as policies to do with change typically only affect those who aren’t. Issues like the Black Civil Rights Movement, rallying for LGBT rights, and recently Roe vs. Wade have been issues that have uninvolved straight white men and therefore they have the luxury of claiming that these things do not matter to them and that they’re on the fence, these days you cannot afford to be on the fence as being on the fence is similar to not speaking out against these issues, a very memorable quote I’ve heard is that nowadays it is not enough to be not racist, you have to be anti-racist. What this means that it is fine to not be racist, however, to make a difference and not perpetuate negative stereotypes about disadvantaged groups, you must do something to make a difference, trying to let people know when something is racist, educating people on these issues and having discussions and if all this fails, removing the racist people from your life. This doesn’t just fall under racism though, you can also apply this to issues like transphobia, sexism, ableism, and more issues that affect those in disadvantaged groups in society. The final point this social media text brings up is more of a personal reflection when looking into this post is that in the democratic society we have set up, no one wins besides the people on the top. I’m not saying this to dismiss democracy as a whole, I believe the basis of democracy is essential and voting and exercising our rights as a citizen should be encouraged, however, the current system we have is flawed. There are many reasons for this, the most standout reason is the benefit straight white men receive and how they are the status quo. Since forever straight white men have been at the top, they are the ones that decide what happens, in the 1800s, only men were allowed to vote, until 1964 segregation was still legal in the USA, what many consider to be the most forward country in the world, and only in 2011 in New Zealand was gay marriage legalised, all of this has never affected the straight white man, and because of this, they have held power since the beginning, deciding what is allowed and what isn’t. this doesn’t sound like democracy, rather it sounds like a society focused on the success of capitalism, one where the rich get richer, and the poor get poorer. This isn’t what the original idea of democracy is, the current face of democracy has molded over the past 300 years since the birth of the United States to have the people who have been in charge ever since being the ones that do not have to face systematic oppression and are the ones who were able to dish it out with little to no consequences ever since.

The second social media text brings an important reminder about the wording of people in power and the wording that many use to avoid accountability. It also informs us on how our perception of things is so fragile that 1 or 2 words of a headline can change everything it means, with this also being a commentary on the news and how important things are reported on to present a narrative that fits what those in power believe to be the best action. Humans control what happens in society, that is a known fact, and this also includes the economy and the news that reports on these facts. The first point made by this is how altering what is reported changes our perception of what is reported, a big example that many of us can understand how it works is fake news. News that is false or misleading, while not having one static definition, any reports that are fueled by false information are constituted as “fake news”, being popularised in recent years through social media posts on sites like Twitter and Facebook, typically by political groups used to paint one group as the aggressor or the ones in the wrong. This isn’t specifically a political issue though, this includes anything with the intent to redirect attention, blame, or misinform the public. The wording of reporting on the topics mentioned in the social media text is what could be considered “misleading” therefore making it in a sense fake news even if what they’re reporting isn’t entirely wrong, mentioning things while excluding others and not including the full context skews the publics view of what is truly going on. Not mentioning landlords when talking about rent going up, not mentioning corporations when talking about the increase in inflation, not discussing employers when talking about wages being stagnant, and not mentioning the purposeful understaffing of hospitals by the hospitals themselves, regardless of if it is true or not, absolves those who are guilty of wrongdoing, reporting on the news changes us as people, even if it’s true, reporting things in a negative light or things associated with negative stories can seep into our subconscious or even increase the chance of having a heart attack according to this BCC article. Changing just 1 or 2 words changes the context and what the report truly means, with things like the way mental health is reported on and the language used is historically a stigmatized topic and is prone to featuring many negative stereotypes because of how the media reports on things, not necessarily being the news but radio, tv, and movies are all guilty of this. The second point of this post although not specifically mentioned, is the news and hidden agendas. Everyone is prone to bias, that is a fact, although I’m not saying this is a bad thing, it is a truth that we live with and the beliefs we have been influenced by those around us, media knows this and does what they can to control what they want us to believe that goes with the narrative that suits them, as I explained earlier by doing things such as changing just a few words to change the context of the entire story and to fit what they want to report, rather than the whole truth as they have the statistics of what their viewers want, they understand their audience and the biases they have and play into those to boost their viewership and to maximise profit, they turn News into a business, the most notable groups in the US politics and News sphere is CNN and Fox News who represent liberal and conservative groups respectively. They are guilty of having bias, reporting on what their group wants to hear and attacking what they don’t like, while neither is 100% correct neither is 100% false it depends on how and what they present as both have lists of controversies and allegations of bias that are easily researchable. The most important point brought up by this social media text is that there is a person controlling these things, as said earlier the news does not report on the individuals responsible for the things listed, rather choosing to leave out context and have it be a mystery as to who is responsible because these are controlled by people, everything is, rent is, inflation is, wages are, staffing is, and most importantly the economy. There is no mysterious reason as to why these things happen, there is always a person behind the wheel, very much like how there is a so-called “Big Six” controlling the American media. Newscorp, AT&T, CBS, Comcast, Disney, and Viacom. These six are the ones that control 90% of the media in the United States and most importantly they are companies, living under and controlling a capitalistic society, the news, and the media. It is difficult to find a media company not directly related to these groups, they work as cogs in a society governed by those in power, those with the most money. I believe that this should not exist, the news should be reported and covered with a lack of bias from the ones above, we must carefully and with discretion choose what we believe and what we share online, in person, or however we share the news. We must not have a bias towards one group over others and be objective with whatever we do, if we can truly act in that way, I don’t know but we must do what we can. Reporting the full truth instead of trying to avoid facing the consequences is essential for anyone, especially companies that control what or who we believe.

1 note · View note

giftstorebox · 2 years

Text

How Do I Register To Vote

How Do I Register To Vote For example, in Colorado you have to register by mail well ahead of time, whereas in New York you can register online right up until the election day. Who can vote You can register to vote if you are a U.S. citizen and meet one of three requirements: You're at least 18 years old on Election Day; you're an Alaska Native or American Indian born in Hawaii; or you've been declared mentally incompetent by a court. If you're not sure about your status, check with your local elections office. Many states now let you register online—it's fast and easy! Be sure that any information provided is correct, because registration errors can delay voting for hours on Election Day. Voter registration deadlines Most states’ registration deadlines fall between 1 month and 8 days before an election. Although some states allow same-day voter registration (SDR), many do not, so if you miss your state’s registration deadline, you may still be able to register and vote in person at your county elections office during early voting or on election day (ED). For more information about how to register and vote in your area, visit The League of Women Voters website. Many organizations hold drives for voter registration just prior to an election. You can also contact your local elections office or political party for more information on registering and voting in your area. If you’re already registered but want a reminder about upcoming elections, consider signing up for automatic voter notification through TurboVote. Requesting an absentee ballot In order to vote, you have to register—but just because you have registered doesn’t mean your ballot will automatically be counted. If you live overseas, work late hours or simply don’t feel like going outside on a rainy election day, absentee ballots are for you. You’re not required by law to give a reason for wanting an absentee ballot, and there are several ways to request one: by mail, via email or in person at your local election office or other designated locations. Requests must be submitted no later than five days before Election Day; however, ballots must be received (not postmarked) before Election Day if they're sent via snail mail or 10 days before Election Day if they're sent electronically. Voting with a provisional ballot If you think you’re registered but haven’t received your mail-in ballot yet, or if you show up at your polling place on Election Day and they can’t find your name in their system, there is an easy solution: Cast a provisional ballot. In most cases, these ballots are eventually counted — so long as you vote in person at least once every four years (and in no other state), you should be able to have that ballot counted, too. There are some exceptions and rules vary from state to state; consult NCSL for details about whether voting with a provisional ballot will help guarantee your vote is counted. Voting with a ‘provisional’ voter ID card If you don’t have a state ID, you can still register and vote at your polling place. Be sure to bring your proof of identification when you go. You may be given a provisional ballot, which will allow you to cast a vote that will ultimately be counted after election officials check your identification. If they are able to confirm your identify from looking at other records or speaking with someone who knows you, then that vote will count for sure! No matter what happens though – even if your provisional vote isn’t counted – it doesn’t affect whether or not you need an ID to register in subsequent elections. Checking your registration status To register, you need to provide some personal information, like your name, address and date of birth. You'll also need proof that you're a U.S. citizen—most states accept a valid driver's license or state ID card for that purpose. If your voter registration is in another state, you'll have to resister there, too—unless you're registering for federal elections only (like elections for president). Finally, most states require voters to provide an up-to-date photo ID when voting at their polling places; don't forget yours if it's required! What happens after you apply to register It depends on where you live. Once you've applied, your application is sent to your state's registration office, which will check its records and confirm that: (1) you're eligible; and (2) you haven't registered before in that state. If all looks good, it will send a confirmation notice with directions for voting; if it doesn't, it will send a letter explaining why not (usually along with ways to fix any issues). At some point between receiving a confirmation notice and Election Day, your state may also contact you by mail or phone as part of an outreach program aimed at getting more voters registered. Federal law requires states to register citizens who are eligible and make sure those registrations are up-to-date. What if you don’t know who to ask? Voting is a constitutional right. It’s also an important civic duty. Many states allow registration by mail or online, so check your state and local election board's website for more information. Depending on where you live, you may need proof of citizenship and identification in order to register. To vote in person, bring proof of residency when you head to your polling location on Election Day. Once you’re registered and ready for voting day, many states have early voting options, which let eligible voters cast ballots in person weeks before election day itself—they typically take place at a county office building or other designated location during business hours over multiple days. You Might Also Like: How to watch Thursday Night Football on Prime Video 100 Best Restaurants Near Me 5 Ways To Watch Thursday Night Football On Fire Stick Today #1 Essential Newborn Checklist 20+ Ultimate Baby Essentials List for First Time Moms Read the full article

0 notes

arpov-blog-blog · 2 years

Text

When you look at the fact most voters are paying for the 2017 tax cuts to the wealthy, and you look at the fact that no President or party has much control over the price of gas, but look at the record profits of oil companies and you can see who does, and if you look at the fact that most of the inflationary forces are global not just in the US, and if you look at the fact that the Biden Administration took steps to correct supply chain problems while the previous Administration and GOP controlled Senate ignored those problems. We might see a midterm with different results than the talking heads have been spinning for the past 8 months...."The best empirical news for Democrats is the trajectory of the congressional generic ballot, the midterm indicator that has had the most predictive value in the past. As recently as June 13, Republicans had a 3.5 percent advantage in the RCP averages for this measurement of congressional voting preferences, with the expectation that the margin would widen as voting grew near. Now the generic ballot is basically tied (Republicans: 44.7 percent, Democrats: 44.6 percent). Historically, the party controlling the White House loses steam late in the midterm cycle, but at the moment, Biden’s party does seem to have some momentum. And in the national contest where Democrats have most reason to be optimistic, the battle for control of the Senate, Republicans continue to suffer from candidate-quality problems that could lose them seats they probably should win in a midterm. John Fetterman keeps maintaining a solid lead over Mehmet Oz in Pennsylvania; this race is for a seat currently held by the GOP. And in Georgia, Raphael Warnock continues to run comfortably ahead of Herschel Walker even before the frequently tongue-tied former football great reluctantly faces the highly eloquent incumbent Democrat in debates.

There is no way to know, much less factor in, late-breaking real-world developments that might affect the trajectory of these and other midterm contests, whether it’s unexpected economic news, a change of direction in the Russia-Ukraine war, or an official 2024 candidacy announcement by Trump that reminds Democrats that the wolf is still at the door. Typically, voting preferences form well before Election Day, and early voting will begin in September in some states. At present, FiveThirtyEight gives Republicans an 80 percent probability of controlling the House next year and Democrats a 59 percent chance of holding the Senate. These numbers are better for Democrats than those we saw in June and July. But don’t get your hopes up — or down — just yet."

0 notes

michigansummer · 2 years

Text

learning how to vote (taking responsibility)

primaries are coming up in Michigan, and I’m getting prepared to vote. turns out, this is a lot more difficult than I thought! for context, here is my background:

freshman year of high school, I took AP Gov. this class was very genuinely informative about government and politics, and our teacher really did a great job with the material. back then, I was happy to fulfill my civics requirement with this class, but I’ve come to think that it would be better if I had taken it later on in high school, when it would be more applicable to my responsibilities as a voting citizen.

I was a Model UN kid! obviously, MUN didn’t specifically educate me on how I should think as a voter in the United States. still, I learned a lot about how government works around the world and was able to contextualize my perspective on the US government. we read and discussed a lot of world news as part of our club time, and we discussed national news as well. for the two years in which I was heavily invested in MUN, I would’ve considered myself to be a very well-informed citizen.

I tried policy debate for a while as well (a senior I had a crush on in MUN invited me to join the forensic speaking team and I ended up joining debate team as well the following fall). to be honest, I never quite got into it and always felt like I lagged behind. I could not gauge how relevant policy debate experience would be to learning how to vote, but I do remember reading a lot about the role of government.

nowadays, I never read the news anymore. I could tell you the benefits of rank-choice voting, but I couldn’t reason my way through the stances of candidates that are currently running for office. I’m very far from being well informed, and the confusing nature of primaries doesn’t help.

the first thing that confused me about primaries is the fact that you’re only allowed to vote for candidates in one party, at least here in Michigan. I vaguely remember learning about this in AP Gov. (full disclosure, these are my very lightly researched thoughts, as an average voting resident of Michigan, not as someone that does actually know a lot about voting). when I was reminded again about this fact in early July, I was somewhat bothered. in my mind, I thought that for each race, I should be able to vote for each candidate that would be running in November, not just one of them. I still have yet to fully understand how this will affect how I vote on August 2nd.

the second thing that’s giving me a hard time is that I’m just not well informed, and trying to form genuinely honest opinions about candidates is very difficult. when it comes to things in my every day life, I’m already well aware that many of my opinions are barely in my control, and formed without my complete awareness. I struggle with knowing that at the end of the day, my opinion will just be a regurgitated form of what I heard from someone else. of course, this doesn’t absolve me of my responsibility to try my best to be an informed voter.

I couldn’t tell you exactly why I decided to fall out of the loop. I don’t know when I stopped considering myself an informed citizen. this is what I do know:

when I stopped attending MUN meetings regularly, I stopped reading the news often. without the weekly responsibility to gather news articles to discuss, I quickly fell out of the habit. this was probably around the beginning of 2020.

being politically informed became a popular topic that summer. I'm sure you know why, and I won’t discuss that here. this is relevant to my voting story because around this time is when I became incredibly disillusioned with everything political. that’s still where I am right now.

the thing is that when I became less informed about politics, I was happier. I also questioned if I was truly ever informed in the first place. I had always frequented news outlets like AP and Al Jazeera, but I never had the tools to process what I read on my own. all I could do was speak my opinion and see how the discussion developed around the room. without MUN, there was no discussion, and no easy way for me to further develop my view of the world.

when I became disillusioned with politics, I also think that I slowly started to become a better person to the people in my life. my imagined sphere of influence changed from being nationwide to being very local. paraphrasing many influential historical figures, love is the best way to nurture good in this world. I believe this wholeheartedly, and had I struggled to reconcile this point of view with active political engagement, a sphere in which I always felt a little hateful no matter how hard I tried to be calm. it’s easier to be good to the people you already care about, after all.

I believe that being as good as you can to the people in your life is one of the easiest and most effective ways to make the world a better place. these are people you care about, and who care about you. people that know you, and people who will listen to your story. people that care about each other shape each other and can inspire one another to do even better with the rest of their lives. this is the perspective that fits nicely into my brain, that frees me of the dissonance I associate with politics.

the most recent piece of media that I consumed that affected my perspective on politics was Hillbilly Elegy, by JD Vance. I read it just about a year ago. if you haven’t read it, know that it’s a memoir written by a man who grew up somewhere in Appalachia, in coal country, with loved ones dealing with opioid addiction. it's more than that, but it's also just a story of his life and how his beliefs came to be. I cannot describe it well, so read the summary, and read the book if it interests you. what it did for me is made me realize that behind every single vote is a story.

no matter how hard I disagree with how others vote, I realize that they have been raised and taught differently and see the affects of the actions of our representatives in government differently. of course someone whose family’s living depends on coal would vote differently than me. of course others see the world differently.

this made me think how can I blame anyone for everything when we are all so different and will never really understand each other!! how can I vote when it’s so hard to trace fault! how can I vote, when people will be hurt either way!

which brings me back to the fact that all of this does not excuse me from the responsibility of voting. that’s what I think voting is now: a responsibility. I was paralyzed when I thought about politics from a perspective of fault and blame, and it kept me out of the loop for two years. it kept me out of the loop for years, when thinking that way would never have gotten me anywhere. I still don't think I'm going to regularly read the news, but instead of thinking about who’s right and wrong and whose fault anything is, I’m learning to think about responsibility.

this is how I see responsibility right now (always subject to change)—when something comes into your life, it becomes, at least partially, your responsibility. sometimes we hurt people and in that case we are responsible, no matter if we had bad intentions or if it was an accident. sometimes we are the ones that are hurt, and that too is our responsibility. responsibility is not strongly related to justice or fairness. it's simply something we do because it's in our power to do so.

together, everybody that is able to vote is partially responsible for what happens in this government. no matter how many factors affect us that are out of our control or how hard we mess up, voting remains our responsibility. instead of just complaining about injustice and fairness, I’m trying my best to learn how to be informed and vote. to accept that there will always be things that are out of my control, and to try my hardest to fight for what I believe will do good regardless.

it’s difficult, and frustrating. I have only a few days left. websites like turbovote.org, vote.org, and vote411.org have helped. I think I’m making progress.

I will probably be forever always changing and developing these opinions. for now, am I driven to vote, and hope that the time I spend on trying to be informed will help make the world just a bit better.

#What are you currently frustrated by?

0 notes

the1918 · 4 years

Text

where to devote your ‘Give A Fuck’: the friday late edition

Alternatively titled: “For fuck’s sake, ignore the existence of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania until further notice” wait, no “I might let you finally think about Pennsylvania later today, but let’s party in the Southeast and Southwest until at least dinner time.” “The news outlets are telling you it’s close, but it’s not. Joe Biden has [still] won the election, and I would eat Steve Kornacki’s peach if he let me.”

Thanks for sticking with me (and for the incredible feedback!). I’m gonna try to keep providing you with news about what matters to the outcome of this presidential election until we officially get to 270 and probably a little after. Previous version of this post here.

***

UPDATED 11:30 PM ET 11/6

(Link to original post for updates if this is a reblog)

If you’ve heard nothing but silence from me today (unless you’re following the Give a Fuck spreadsheet), it’s because nothing has changed from last night. Joe Biden has still been elected as the next President of the United States, and you should still be giving Zero Fucks to any of the news coverage if you’re trying to preserve your Mental Health Points™.

Your list of state races to Give a Fuck About is still: ZERO. Here’s why.

Note: Below I am not going to talk much about actual leads and numbers, but you can see them on the Give a Fuck spreadsheet.

Let’s flesh out why you should be reading dirty fanfiction instead of watching the news.

“Has anything changed?” Nothing you need to, well. Give a fuck about. The statuses of each race I discussed last night are basically unchanged.

NEVADA: Biden is winning by +1.7% margin and growing. He will win by 40k-50k votes. If you’ve seen the memes, you know this has been a slow count. I answered an ask about that earlier.

PENNSYLVANIA: When I posted last night, Biden was closing in on Trump’s initial lead as the overwhelmingly Democrat mail-in ballots were being counted, and Trump’s lead was 25k when I went to bed. As of 11:30PM ET on Friday, Biden has taken a commanding and ever-growing lead with almost 30,000 votes ahead of Trump in a +0.4% margin. He will win PA’s 20 electoral votes with a comfortable margin and get pushed over 270, straight into the White House.

GEORGIA: The status here is so unchanged it’s laughable. Biden did overtake Trump’s lead, and he will eventually win this state on a razor thin margin, but only after a recount. No one is waiting on Georgia, though. At this point it’s a moot point to the outcome.

ARIZONA: Last night I said “who the fuck knows, and I don’t care,” and that’s still my stance on Arizona. The only thing I would change is that “who the fucks knows” would now more accurately be “looks like Trump is shit out of luck,” because there’s only 90k left to count, and Trump can’t even tie Biden’s lead with that unless every Democrat in Phoenix suddenly joined the alt-right on election day.

“If you’re so confident Biden has been elected, then why aren’t news outlets calling it?” The short answer is, “because I’m a Captain America daddy smut blogger and there are no consequences to my actions regarding this matter.” But projections from news networks have very real impacts around the world, so they have to establish certain operating standards prior to election night and they have to stick to it.

What are these standards? For as much as I like my cable news conspiracy theories, it’s important to understand that Rachel Maddow and Cooper Anderson and even their producers are not the ones that get to make the decision to project winners. Those people are all a part of the ‘news desk,’ but it’s a completely separate and sequestered entity at their network (they literally aren’t allowed to talk or hear or even look at news desk) called the ‘decision desk’ that analyzes the raw vote count data and actually determines whether the network is ready to confidently call the race. In all races that are considered competitive, all of these decision desks have a standard margin under which they will not permit themselves to release a projection; at most networks, this margin is 0.5%. Now... this tells you why they haven’t called Pennsylvania (Biden +0.4% and growing) and Arizona (Biden +0.9% and shrinking, but not fast enough to matter), but I am truly lost as to why they haven’t called Nevada with 93% of the vote counted and Biden’s +1.8% and growing lead. Whatever.

“I’m hearing that Trump is filing more than a dozen lawsuits to obstruct the vote count in various states. Should I be worried?”

Absolutely not. You should give negative fucks about Trump’s legal challenges. All of them are frivolous, most of them aren’t even asking for an action that would prevent votes from being counted, and the two that do are weak AF and wouldn’t affect the outcome of the election even if they succeeded. In the words of the Pennsylvania Attorney General earlier today, “There has been a lot of noise, but there has been literally zero impact on the fate of the votes.”

The only challenge Trump has any kind of chance of winning (the legal motion, not the race) that would actually prevent votes from being counted is this one case he has been hounding after in Pennsylvania for almost a month now. He has been trying to keep a particular group of mail-in ballots from being counted, specifically those that were post-marked by election day but arrived later between election day and November 6 (today). The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has already ruled that those votes should be counted, and as of today, Trump has tried on three separate occasions to try and get the US Supreme Court to intervene-- and all three times the Court has declined. The kicker? That group of ballots hasn’t even been counted yet, and Biden is still on track to win Pennsylvania by tens of thousands of votes. Every single one of those ballots could be for Trump and Biden would still win it.

***

That’s it for tonight. I have officially given up on projecting when the news outlets will start to call this thing, but you can keep up with a short and sweet status of the artist formerly known as the Give a Fucks on Give a Fuck spreadsheet, which I update regularly... but seriously, only if you actually have the Mental Health Points™ to dedicate to it. This election is decided, and everything else is just math made unnecessarily sensational. Tomorrow I’ll do a post about some of the incredible other things related to this election that you should absolutely give a fuck about, like the way black voters have turned out to stick a foot up Trump’s racist ass.

Also, let’s all take a moment to send the greatest of good vibes out to the election workers in these battleground states. They are paid shit, are working around the clock breaking their backs with moving boxes, getting papercuts, and very eye in the world is on them and pressuring them to work faster when they just want everyone to shut up so they can do their job. True American heroes, in all honesty.

***

(Visit the original version of this post for updates if this is a reblog)

#election 2020 #thank you for your time and for listening to the shit i spew #i care about you #yes YOU #you specifically #the give a fuck list

284 notes · View notes

deja-you · 3 years

Text

domestic tranquility

m. de lafayette x reader

summary: a collection of intimate scenes from the L/n Administration, or the ‘what if’ ending to foreign affairs.

word count: 4.3k

author’s note: i hope this makes up for the ending of foreign affairs :) also a special thank you to @astralaffairs because she is my inspiration and she took the time to help edit this and i just love her in general

masterlist | foreign affairs

“Lafayette, will you marry me?”

The other line was silent, and you almost thought he had hung up on you.

“Hello?”

“I’m sorry, I must’ve heard you wrong. I could have sworn you just asked me to marry you.”

“I did.”

You could hear him suck in a deep breath. “Chèrie, I don’t understand.”

“Lafayette, I know this is a lot to ask. I’m going to run for president. I’m the perfect candidate, I really am. I’m what America needs right now.”

“Of course you are. Where do I come into this?”

“My staff has run some numbers. I do a lot better in the polls if I’m in a committed relationship. But the problem is, I’m not in a committed relationship.”

“You want to lie to the press and tell them we’re married?”

“I don’t want to lie to them. I’m asking you to marry me. It wouldn’t be a lie.”

“Huh.”

“You can say no. I know this is a lot to ask. It’s crazy, reall—”

“Okay.”

“What?”

“Let’s get married.”

Your jaw hung open. “Just like that, you’re on board?”

“You should be president, chèrie. I want to help you any way I can.”

“Are you sure about this? This isn’t something to be taken lightly.”

“Believe me, I’m taking this very seriously. I’m going to get on the next plane to New York. We’ll talk about this in person.”

You opened your mouth to say something else, but you found yourself at a loss for words. “Okay. I’ll see you soon.”

“See you soon,” he repeated. “Let’s get married.”

You were in Iowa.

For some reason you had to come to godforsaken Iowa to become president. You didn’t think about how stupid corn was. You couldn’t think about it, just in case it somehow slipped out and you then alienated all the voters in Iowa. But you really didn’t care.

What you did care about was the sight of your French husband (it still felt strange to call him that) contentedly eating away at a cob of corn. A strange contrast to the sight of him smoking cigarettes and drinking a diabolo menthe at a Parisian café, but he looked just at home at the Iowa State Fair as he did in France.

His eyes lit up when he saw you, and he gestured for you to join him. Pasting on a smile, you made your way over to him and a series of photographers followed after you.

“Chèrie, have you tried this? It is amazing. This is the best corn I have ever had,” he said, waving around the corn on the cob animatedly while he spoke. The photographers were eating it up, and the corn on the cob vendor was smiling proudly.

You were absolutely bewildered by just how magnetizing he was. People loved him just for eating corn. You couldn’t even blame them, because you knew just how infectious his smile was when he was genuinely happy.

This marked your first official outing as a couple on the campaign trail since you had married Lafayette. If you were honest, you had been nervous about the whole ordeal, but the second Lafayette sent you that easygoing look, you relaxed.

When you were close enough, his hand found yours and he was quick to intertwine your fingers together. This was where the real and unreal collided. His genuine smile and unharnessed affection met your faltering remembrance that this wasn’t the loving marriage it looked like. It was serving its purpose at this exact moment.

You counted each time the camera flashed to take a picture of you and Lafayette walking hand in hand. You could see the headlines on tomorrow’s papers, and you could see Lafayette’s grinning face. A political marriage certainly wasn’t traditional or morally acceptable, but there were real issues that needed to be tackled. You had plans to reform the health care system and the economy. If Lafayette helped you achieve a platform where you could really make a difference, who cared if you bent a few social constructs?

Besides, it gave you the opportunity to reconnect with an old… friend.

“You really like corn?” You asked him quietly.

Lafayette sent a disarming smile to the photographers, and leaned in very closer to whisper in your ear, “I can’t stand corn. Get me out of Iowa.”

You didn’t hide your laugh, and the photographers quickly shot a few more photos of the two of you being a cute couple. Lafayette really didn’t like the corn? You had been so convinced his smile was real. You were beginning to think you couldn’t tell the difference between what was fake and what was real.

There was some kind of external force that wanted you and Lafayette to end up together.

You were sure of this, because you had expelled him from your life multiple times by now. The memory of him leaving you on the sidewalk in D.C. felt like it was just yesterday, but now you were back in his arms. And it felt so natural.

So yes, there was something pulling the two of you together. You didn’t want to call it fate. You didn’t really believe in that. It had to be something stronger. There was something tugging at your heart telling you it was choice, but you didn’t want to believe that, either. Your fingers gripped his suit a little tighter in an attempt to ground yourself.

This was good. This was nice, you thought as you swayed back and forth. There were thousands of eyes trained on you, and millions watching you from home on their TVs. The thought that so many people were watching you right now was daunting, but it was nothing that you weren’t used to at this point. You were the Leader of the Free World. The President of the United States.

You could hear a few cameras click, and you flashed a disarming smile in their direction. A well-known singer was crooning out the words to a slow, melodic version of Stand by Me. Your husband squeezed your hip lightly, causing you to look up at him while he absently swayed with you.

He grinned when you met his gaze and softly whispered, “relax a little. This is your moment. Enjoy it. You’ve earned it.”

Your stiff smile melted into a genuine one and you gave him a small nod. He was right, you did deserve this. The road to the White House had been one paved with blood, sweat, and tears, and you still hadn’t stepped foot in the building yet. A few more balls, and then you could finally move into your new home for the next four to eight years. But you had earned it.

The last year and a half had been the craziest 18 months of your life, and you knew it wasn’t about to get easier anytime soon. But this was good. This was nice. You didn’t have to worry about any political opponents or Supreme Court appointments right now. All you had to do was dance leisurely with your attractive husband.

“What are your thoughts on my seeking out a second term?” you asked quietly on the ride back to the White House.

There were a few more balls that you and Lafayette had attended, staying only long enough to share a dance or two with the press before heading to the next event. It had been a non-stop day; the inaugural address in the morning and the inaugural balls in the evening, and everything in between had successfully worn you thin. Lafayette had been at your side all day, and you could tell that he was exhausted as well.

“Ma chèrie, you were just sworn in. How can you already be thinking about re-election?” Lafayette yawned, slumping back against the seat with his bowtie undone and hanging lazily around his neck.

You laughed softly and shook your head from side to side. “It’s you I’m concerned about.”

“Hm?”

You shifted in your seat to look him in the eye. “You agreed to marry me so I could win the Presidency. I told you that we would only have to stay married while I was in the White House. So what are your thoughts on eight years instead of four?”

“Are you kidding me, Y/n?” Lafayette asked incredulously.

You pursed your lips and raised an eyebrow in confusion.

“You’re running for a second term. And I’m going to be by your side through it all. That is, if you still want to be President after dealing with Congress for four years.”

This solicited a laugh from you. He paused before he continued. The pause was the space between you and him, between the Earth and the Sun and everything in between. A hesitancy for the desperation of being wanted and the interval for not knowing if that was what he wanted.

“And of course, if you still want me by your side in four years.”

You tilted your head to the side and smiled at him. “Of course I’ll still want you by my side. We made a promise. For better or for worse.”

Lafayette took your hand in his and raised it to his lips. “For better or for worse.”

Somehow you found the time to sit down and watch a movie in the White House movie theater.

Lafayette chooses some sort of action movie, you can’t even remember the title of the film and you decide that it’s not important.

You’ve invited some close friends to join you for the night. The Hamiltons (of course), your chief of staff, Nathan Hale, and his partner, and a few other White House senior staffers. All people you would trust with your life and your secrets.

You know Alex’s suspected for a while that you and Lafayette got married for political reasons. He’s a real politician, so he’s one of the few who have actually considered that marriage could be an ambitious political move. A heartless speculation, yes, but he isn’t exactly wrong. You consider that he’s mentioned the idea to Eliza, but you’ve given them no confirmation on the subject.

Nathan knows you better than you know yourself after working for you for all these years. And he knows about your history with Lafayette. He may have been the one to plant the idea in your head of calling Lafayette up before you ran for office, but you’ve never officially explained to him the truth about your relationship. You don’t need to.

The point is, most people in this room know both you and Lafayette completely. And you trust everyone in this room completely. Even if they did find out the truth, it wouldn’t matter. You know your secret would be safe. Knowing all this, you begin to wonder who you’re trying to convince that your marriage is real.

It has to be someone. You’re not throwing your arms around his shoulders and pulling him close for your own benefit. Lafayette isn’t getting you a bag of popcorn and placing a kiss to your cheek for any other reason than because he really wants to sell this marriage.

You have to be putting on this performance for someone, because if not, that would mean you’re shooting Lafayette loving looks for no other reason except for the fact that you want to. And that can’t be right. Quid est veritas?

You’re given relief from the thoughts turning around and around and around in your head when the lights turn down low. You take your seat beside Lafayette (something in you tells you that your place has always been beside him). The movie starts playing and you relax for the first time since before you were sworn in as president (was that nearly a year ago?).

You don’t know if it’s because there’s something therapeutic about watching a fictional President having to deal with fictional problems, or if it’s relaxing because Lafayette has pulled you to his side and his hand absently runs through your hair. You decide it’s both.

“Are you tired?” Lafayette whispers in your ear quietly about halfway through the movie.

You are tired, but you insist on whispering back a no. He doesn’t believe you. Lafayette turns his head and presses his forehead against yours. The movie is forgotten in the background, you have his complete attention.

“Close your eyes,” he says softly. “Get some rest. I’ve got you.”

You want to kiss him. You’re so close to him now, all you would have to do is tilt your head just slightly to the right. If you kiss him now, you can say you were just trying to sell the relationship. To the maybe five people in the (dark) room who weren’t even paying attention to you, and even if they were none of them were about to report to the press that they thought your marriage was a sham. It’s not a good excuse, but you’re still considering it.

You don’t consider it any further; you don’t get to. A bit of light comes flooding into the movie theater, and you hear some hushed voices at the entrance.

“Madam President?”

Regretfully, you untangle your limbs from Lafayette’s and sit up. A White House staffer gives you an apologetic look and explains that there’s been a situation. You don’t look back at Lafayette because you know you’d be met with a look of disappointment. Instead, you make a light joke to the audience about never getting a break and they all laugh politely and urge you to go take care of the matter at hand.

You recall the 25th amendment while you’re leaving the theater, and you try to recall what the succession of the presidency really means. What is the Vice President doing tonight? You’re too busy thinking about what it would feel like to have your husband’s arms wrapped around you once more to think about whatever situation had arisen, did that make you unfit for office? Could someone else just take over for one night so you could spend the evening with Lafayette?

“You stayed up?”

You didn’t know what time it was – didn’t need to – but it was late. You had spent the entire day flying back from meetings in Germany, and then more meetings on the plane. You were exhausted, your staff was exhausted, so by the time you got back to the residency you were certain that you were the only one on the planet who was still awake.

“Didn’t want you to be alone.” Lafayette is still awake.

He looks tired, and you know he’s beyond tired. No doubt his schedule has been filled all day, and the both of you have to be up – four hours? That’s hardly enough sleep to function properly. And yet Lafayette has sacrificed his sleep because he didn’t want you to be alone.

Not that you would have been alone. You had planned on entering the residency quietly and sliding into bed beside him after you changed into sweats. You would let his rhythmic breathing lull you to sleep, and you’d hardly feel alone. But you’d be lying if you said his consciousness wasn’t a comforting presence to you.

“How was Germany?” He yawns.

You’re in a hurry to change out of your suit because the soft comforter of the bed is calling your name. You hardly process his words, murmuring some practiced, diplomatic response. He says he wishes he could’ve come with you, and you tell him you understand why he couldn’t this time. Next time, you say.

“You shouldn’t have stayed up for me,” you tell him once you’re comfortably situated in your favorite pair of sweats.

“For you? I was waiting up for the Vice President. Jay and I had a little rendez-vous planned for tonight, you just got back early.” His grin is tired, but there’s still a playful twinkle in his eye.

You sit beside him on the bed, giving him a little shove and rolling your eyes. “If you had said Secretary Hamilton, I might’ve believed you.”

He leans on you slightly, his head resting on top of yours. “Secretary Hamilton?”

“Mmhmm,” you say quietly. “The two of you have far too much chemistry.”

“Ma chèrie.” He lifts his head off yours just enough to turn to face you, and two of his fingers move your head so you’re facing each other. There’s only one bedside lamp turned on right now, and he’s taking this moment to memorize the lines of your face and the exact shade of your eyes. “You know you’re the only one for me.”

You realize you don’t love him in the way you used to. Not in a bad way, you haven’t stopped loving him. It’s just different this time. It’s honest and real, which is a bit ironic, because the foundations of your marriage were anything but truthful.

You’re polite, so your smile often is fake. He’s real. Right in front of you, right beside you. Every night. There’s something about his mercy and selflessness that you are in love with. He’s teaching you what it really means to be human. Even if you didn’t love him for that, you are so covered in him you wouldn’t know what else to be.

Whatever bravery you had stored up for debating political adversaries or promoting your most radical ideas suddenly possessed you, and you felt yourself leaning forward and pressing your lips against his. In the privacy of your shared residency. With no one around to see.

It’s almost like something breaks in him, if just for a moment. Maybe it’s the sleeplessness that’s slowing eroding away at his brain. Maybe he’s like you, and he’s also been wanting this for longer than he’s willing to admit, but he doesn’t hesitate, he just melts into you.

Your head feels foggy, you can’t really think, all you know is that this feels good. It’s the kind of intoxicating feeling that reminds you of the first time you kissed him, but you remind yourself that nothing is like the first time. You don’t love him in the way you used to. It’s different. Better.

“Don’t run for re-election.”

He doesn’t look at you when he speaks. Well, usually he would, but right now he isn’t looking at you. His eyes are memorizing the stitches on your coat, refusing to look at your eyes or your lips or your hands. You recognized the emotions swirling from his heart up to his lips. Shame.

Lafayette had never been anything but supportive when it came to your political career, so hearing him ask you not to run for re-election was a shocker. He loves supporting you. You know it’s out of a place of deep regret and desperation that Lafayette would ever even broach the subject. But he’s desperate now. You can tell.

You take his face in your hands – reaching out for anything good. You’d like to take the moment to just be here with him, but you’ve never been given enough time for that. It hurts him to look at you, but eventually he does.

“What?” You ask him softly. You know you heard him correctly, but you feel the need to prompt him into an explanation.

“I know it’s not my decision. And if you decide that you are going to run for re-election, we’ll put the matter to rest. We can pretend this conversation never happened,” he says sincerely. Lafayette takes a deep breath as if the next part will be difficult for him to articulate. You know that is. “Don’t run for re-election.”

He’s firmer in his request this time. Yes, the shame is still there, but it’s an underlying tone beneath his pure tenderness.

Lafayette’s never asked much from you. When you asked him to marry you, he hardly asked any questions. You know he would do whatever it is you asked of him at any time, so when he asks you not to run for re-election, you already know your answer without him having to explain himself. If this is what he wants, you’ll do it for him.

But you are still the president of the United States. You have a responsibility to your party, the government, and Americans as a whole. After accomplishing all you have in the last four years, it won’t be easy to walk away from the presidency without a reason. No, you don’t deserve a reason from Lafayette – you don’t even need one, if you are being honest – but you can at least pretend to be hesitant when it comes to leaving the Nation’s highest office.

“Why don’t you want me running for re-election?” you ask.

“Because I love you.” He says it like it’s the most simple and straightforward answer he can think of.

You can’t help but smile. “And I love you. But what does that have to do with me not running for re-election?”

“I know you love me. But there’s some part of me that will always think – as long as we’re in the public eye – that you only love me for appearances. That this is only love for the cameras—”

“Laf, it’s not. I promise I love you.”

“I know you do. But I’m always going to wonder. If it’s fake. If it just feels like love because of the atmosphere. For the past four years I’ve had to live with the gnawing fear that you wouldn’t love me outside of the White House. It would kill me if I had to live like this for another four years.”

Your voice is softer when you speak again. “You once told me you’d stay with me if I wanted to run for re-election. You said for better or for worse.”

“I know. That was years ago. That was when I thought you would only stay married to me while we were in the White House. That was when I thought a fake marriage would be enough for me.”

“Laf—”

“Ma chèrie, I want a life with you. One that isn’t just for show. I want to love you because I love you, not because it will help with your polling numbers.” There’s a deliberate determination between his words. He’s nervous. “I love you so much, and I can’t stand the idea of anyone having reason to think it’s anything less than love.”

The Oval Office is golden.

Well, technically, it’s more of a beige with a vibrant blue carpet in the middle of the room displaying the presidential seal. But in the low light of the December afternoon, the room is filled with a golden glow.

You’ve always known you were going to make history, but to actually be history is something altogether new for you. In another month, the drapes in the Oval Office and the furniture would all be replaced with whatever furniture the next president saw fit. It would be too easy for the white house staff to clean out the White House of any trace of you, but maybe if you were lucky you’d be mentioned in a footnote in a textbook somewhere.

It’s not like you are one to make rash choices. The decision of stepping down from office came after long and meticulous thought on the subject. You are more certain that you made the right decision more and more each day, but that doesn’t mean you don’t have your doubts every now and then.

“Am I interrupting anything?” Lafayette knows you better than you know yourself. He can tell by the blank look on your face while you read through a thick file that no, he’s not interrupting anything.

“It’s strange that I can say no,” you sigh softly. “I can’t remember the last time I wasn’t busy. But apparently people don’t care about a lame duck when there’s a shiny new President-Elect.”

He crosses the room and leans against the desk. Lafayette gently tugs your hand up to his lips and presses a delicate kiss against your knuckles. It’s gentle and timid, as if everything about this relationship depends on this small act of affection. You’ve noticed that Lafayette has been more reserved lately, almost like he feels guilty for asking such a heavy favor of you.

“Have I ever told you that you’re my favorite president?” It’s hardly a question and mostly an answer.

You smile, and he can’t help but think about how beautiful you are. He thinks you get more beautiful every day, although he can’t figure out how that’s possible.

“Your favorite? You like me better than President Washington?”

Lafayette hums softly and pulls you out of your seat, lifting you up onto the desk. He stands between your legs, hands resting gently on your hips. His gaze falls from your eyes to your lips, then back up to your eyes, and finally says, “you’re easier on the eyes.”

You laugh – Lafayette swears it’s lyrical – and press a kiss to his cheek. “That’s good to hear. How has the house hunting been going?”

His eyes visibly brighten. “I think I’ve found the place.”

“Is that right?”

“Mmhmm. It’s this piece of property in upstate New York. The drive to the city isn’t so far, and the estate. I just know you’re going to love it.”

You could sense the excitement emanating off of him. “Am I?”

Lafayette nods. “Chèrie, you have to see this place. It has a beautiful kitchen for me to cook in. A balcony – I know you love balconies. A few acres so one day our kids—”

“Our kids?”

His eyes widen as he quickly realizes his mistake. “I—well… yeah? I know we haven’t talked about this. I always pictured us with kids, but if that’s not what you want, I can respect that. We don’t need to have kids, I promise that you are already more than enough for me.”

You bring a hand to cup his face, your thumb softly moving across his cheek as you just hold him. “Lafayette, I want a family with you. I want a future with you. I want forever with you. I love you.”

He brings your lips to his, and for the first time, you’re not worried about it being the last time.

I’m just going to add foreign affairs taglist here :)

@fanfic-addict-98 @wordvomit-foryourmind @farihafangirls @actuallyanita @cubedtriangle @katierpblogg @ballerinafairyprincess @dannighost @ateliefloresdaprimavera @lexylovesfandoms @dovesgrangers @a-hopeless-fan @biafbunny @hermionie-is-my-queen @zeelmol @oi-itsemily @itsjube @someinsanefangirl @awkward-walking-potato @lu123sworld @exorcisms-with-elmo @ohsoverykeri-blog @lizzzaaaaaaaaaaa @poetnstuff @nyxie75 @roxanne2020 @luckyfriesss

#marquis de Lafayette #lafayette #lafayette fic #lafayette imagine #lafayette x reader #hamilton imagine #hamilton fanfic #foreign affairs sequel #foreign affairs #domestic tranquility #hamilton fanfiction #president au #modern au #Daveed Diggs #daveed diggs fanfic #daveed diggs x reader #lafayette fanfic #lafayette fanfiction

138 notes · View notes

weheartchrisevans · 4 years

Link

BOSTON — So you're Tim Scott, the Republican senator from South Carolina who opposes Roe v. Wade and wants to repeal the Affordable Care Act, and you get a call from Chris Evans, a Hollywood star and lifelong Democrat who has been blasting President Trump for years. He wants to meet. And film it. And share it on his online platform. Can anybody say "Borat?" “I was very skeptical,” admits Scott. “You can think of the worst-case scenario.”But then Scott heard from other senators. They vouched for Evans, most famous for playing Captain America in a series of films that have grossed more than $1 billion worldwide. The actor also got on the phone with Scott’s staff to make a personal appeal.

It worked. Sometime in 2018, Scott met on camera with Evans in the nation’s capital, and their discussion, which ranged from prison reform to student loans, is one of more than 200 interviews with elected officials published on “A Starting Point,” an online platform the actor helped launch in July. Not long after, Evans appeared on Scott’s Instagram Live. They have plans to do more together.

“While he is a liberal, he was looking to have a real dialogue on important issues,” says Scott. “For me, it’s about wanting to have a conversation with an audience that may not be accustomed to hearing from conservatives and Republicans.”

Evans, actor-director Mark Kassen and entrepreneur Joe Kiani launched “A Starting Point” as a response to what they see as a deeply polarized political climate. They wanted to offer a place for information about issues without a partisan spin. To do that, they knew they needed both parties to participate.

Evans, 39, sat on the patio outside his Boston-area home on a recent afternoon talking about the platform. He wore a black T-shirt and jeans and spent some of the interview chasing around his brown rescue dog. Nearly 100 million people didn’t vote in the 2016 general election, Evans says. That’s more than 40 percent of those who were eligible.He believes the root of this disinterest is the nastiness on both sides of the aisle. Many potential voters simply turn off the news, never mind talking about actual policy.“A Starting Point” is meant to offer a digital home for people to hear from elected officials without having the conversation framed by Tucker Carlson or Rachel Maddow.

“The idea is . . . ‘Listen, you’re in office. I can’t deny the impact you have,’ ” says Evans. “ ‘You can vote on things that affect my life.’ Let this be a landscape of competing ideas, and I’ll sit down with you and I’ll talk with you.”

Or, as Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), who has appeared on the site, puts it, “Sometimes, boring is okay. You’re being presented two sides. Everything doesn’t have to be sensational. Sometimes, it can just be good facts.” Evans wasn’t always active in politics. At Lincoln-Sudbury Regional High School, he focused on theater, not student government. And he moved away from home his senior year, working at a casting agency in New York as he pushed for acting gigs. His uncle, Michael E. Capuano, served as a congressman in Massachusetts for 20 years, but other than volunteering on some of his campaign, Evans wasn’t particularly political.

In recent years, he’s read political philosopher Hannah Arendt and feminist Rebecca Solnit’s “The Mother of All Questions” — ex-girlfriend Jenny Slate gave him the latter — and been increasingly upset by Trump’s policies and behavior. He’s come to believe that he can state his own views without creating a conflict with “A Starting Point.” When he and Scott spoke on Instagram, the president wasn’t mentioned. In contrast, recently Evans and other members of the Avengers cast took part in a virtual fundraiser with Democratic vice-presidential nominee Kamala D. Harris.

“I don’t want to all of a sudden become a blank slate,” says Evans. “But my biggest issue right now is just getting people to vote. If I start saying, ‘vote Biden; f Trump,’ my base will like that. But they were already voting for Biden.”

(In September, Evans accidentally posted an image of presumably his penis online and, after deleting it, tweeted: “Now the I have your attention . . . Vote Nov. 3rd!!!”)

Evans began to contemplate the idea that became “A Starting Point” in 2017. He heard something reported on the news — he can’t remember exactly what — and decided to search out information on the Internet. Instead of finding concrete answers, Evans fell down the rabbit hole of opinions and conflicting claims. He began talking about this with Kassen, a friend since he directed Evans in 2011’s “Puncture.” What if they got the information directly from elected officials and presented it without a spin? Kassen, in turn, introduced Evans to Kiani, who had made his fortune through a medical technology company he founded and, of the three, was the most politically involved.

Kiani has donated to dozens of Democratic candidates across the country and earlier this year contributed $750,000 to Unite the Country, a super PAC meant to support Joe Biden. But he appreciated the idea of focusing on something larger than a single race or party initiative. He, Kassen and Evans would fund “A Starting Point,” which has about 18 people on staff.

“There’s no longer ABC, NBC and CBS,” Kiani says. “There’s Fox News and MSNBC. What that means is that we are no longer being censored. We’re self-censoring ourselves. And people go to their own echo chamber and they don’t get any wiser. If you allow both parties to speak, for the same amount of time, without goading them to go on into hyperbole, when people look at both sides’ point of view of both topics, we think most of the time they’ll come to a reasonable conclusion.”

“What people do too often is they get in their silos and they only watch and listen and read what they agree with,” says John Kasich, the former Ohio governor and onetime Republican presidential candidate. “If you go to Chris’s website, you can’t bury yourself in your silo. You get to see the other point of view.” As much as some like to blame Trump for all the conflicts in Washington, Sen. Christopher A. Coons (D-Del.) says he’s watched the tone shifting for decades. He appreciated sitting down with Evans and making regular submissions to “Daily Points,” a place on the platform for commentary no longer than two minutes. During the Supreme Court confirmation hearings, Coons recorded a comment on Judge Amy Coney Barrett and the Affordable Care Act.“ ‘A Starting Point’ needs to be a sustained resource,” Coons says. “Chris often talks about it being ‘Schoolhouse Rock’ for adults.”

It’s not by chance that Evans has personally conducted all of the 200-plus interviews on “A Starting Point” during trips to D.C. Celebrities often try to mobilize the public, whether it’s Eva Longoria, Tracee Ellis Ross and Julia Louis-Dreyfus hosting the Democratic National Convention or Jon Voight recording video clips to praise Trump. But in this case, Evans is using his status in a different way, to entice even the most hesitant Republican to sit down for an even-toned chat. And he’s willing to pose with anyone, even if it means explaining himself on “The Daily Show” after Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas posted a selfie with Evans. (Two attempts to interview Trump brought no response.) Murkowski remembers when Evans came to Capitol Hill for the first time in 2018. She admits she didn’t actually know who he was — she hadn’t yet seen any Marvel movies. She was in the minority.“We meet interesting and important people but, man, when Captain America was in the Senate, it was all the buzz,” she says. “And people were like, ‘Did you get your picture taken?’ I said, ‘Yeah, I sat down and did the interview.’ ‘You did an interview? How did you get an interview with him?’ ”What impressed Murkowski wasn’t his star power. It was the way Evans conducted the interview.“It was relaxing,” she says. “You didn’t feel like you were in front of a reporter who was just waiting for you to say something you would get caught on later. It was a dialogue . . . and we need more dialogue and less gotcha.”

“Starting Points” offers two-minute answers by elected officials in eight topic areas, including education, the environment and the economy. This is where the interviews Evans conducted can be found. “Daily Points” has featured a steady flow of Republicans and Democrats. A third area, “Counterpoints,” hosts short debates between officials on particular subjects. Eric Swalwell, a Democrat from California, debated mail-in voting with Dusty Johnson, the Republican congressman from South Dakota.

“Most Americans can’t name more than five members of the United States House,” says Johnson. “ ‘A Starting Point’ allows thoughtful members to talk to a broader audience than we would normally have.”

The platform’s social media team pushes out potentially newsworthy clips, whether it’s Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) discussing his meeting with Barrett just before he tested positive for the coronavirus, or Angus King, the independent senator from Maine, criticizing Trump for his comments on a potential peaceful transfer of power after November’s election. Kassen notes that the King clip was viewed more than 175,000 times on “A Starting Point’s” Twitter account, compared with the 10,000 who caught in on CNN’s social media platform.

“Because it’s short-form media, we’re engineered to be social,” says Kassen. “As a result, when something catches hold, it’s passed around our audience pretty well.”

The key is to use modern tools to push out content that’s tonally different from what you might find on modern cable news. Or on social media. Which is what Evans hopes leads to more engagement. He’s particularly proud that more than 10,000 people have registered to vote through “A Starting Point” since it went online.

“If the downstream impact or the byproduct of this site is some sort of unity between the parties, great,” says Evans. “But if nobody’s still voting, it doesn’t work. We need people involved.”

#chris evans #mark kassan #joe kiani #a starting point #the washington post #news

262 notes · View notes