#that supporting charities that feed children is considered political
Note
Louis might not be chucking bricks at No. 10, but people are responding like he’s never displayed leftist politics or challenged a government position on anything. He supported demands to the government about a fix for UK touring musician post Brexit and Marcus Rashford’s petition about food insecurity. He fought the police about their social media use in 2018 and criticised the UK government position/support for factory workers in the pandemic. The things he speaks about are usually UK issues and meaningful to him or his family and friends. He’s also most likely to speak when he isn’t working. Also that specific anarchy has a punk anti authoritarian message as well. That statement fits Louis pretty well. He has been a poster boy for not sitting down and shutting up and doing what you’re told since 2012. If he was he probably wouldn’t have a solo career and he definitely wouldn’t have sold out the O2.
I like this point about him speaking out more when he's not working, I think that's a really great and useful observation and makes so much sense.
I feel like it makes sense in two ways right now: like first, I don't blame him for not wanting to do things that would jeopardize how beautifully everything is going for him right now after the number of setbacks and troubles he's had to get here, it must feel so precarious. And knowing for a fact that any political statement you make will spawn a dozen tabloid stories and all kinds of outrage is bad enough, but add to that the fact that it's simply impossible to predict which thing will turn into a huge viral mess- it's a lot. And second, he's not just working, he's been on TOUR! I've been around musicians my whole life and one constant is that tour is time outside of normal time and life, it's a bubble, it's only paying attention to right where you are and what's in front of you and the people there with you and everything else is put off and neglected, is for when you get home (and have massive post tour letdown depression and fatigue). I'm not saying he can disconnect with the outside world entirely... but putting everything on pause? I would be surprised if it were any other way, and I would be surprised if he's been following the news and counter news and so forth closely enough to feel comfortable speaking out publicly about anything when it will be so scrutinized and picked apart.
I would add to your list supporting the rail strike (something we wouldn't even know about if it hadn't been tossed in as an aside by an interviewer in the print only version of a piece, he didn't post about it or anything) and attending and posting about the BLM protests (not to mention telling people to pirate his stuff come on how punk is that), and I agree he is much more likely to speak out about UK issues which makes sense: most people are most moved by issues that are close to their lives in some way, and it's his brand.
And I agree that even though as an anarchist I love talking about what anarchism as a political ideology actually is, the symbol does also have a common meaning in the world as just basically standing for anti-authoritarianism, and Louis as a guy who rejects authority and the status quo is nothing new at all and one of the reasons we love him, and in the last few years I feel like he's been going further in that direction both aesthetically and politically, and we love to see it! Plus he has pretty much always sported this slightly punky aesthetic to some degree, even when he was being dressed up like a little ken doll he snuck in skater looks and indie band tees and so forth (something something it's part of why his fanbase was so primed to love his new sound and it wasn't the risk he feared it was because people were always drawn to him who were already into that aesthetic even when his sound wasn't that yet) it's not like it's just a brand new out of nowhere side of him or something.
#I'm not sure I would include the food petition on the list- I realize the bar is so fucking low#that supporting charities that feed children is considered political#but charity stuff is a different category for me... although rashford's specifically was#basically formed as a loud way of criticizing the govt for not doing more and explicitly linked to that... so yeah nm maybe that does fit i#even though its a charity org#I have actually been thinking s lot about how his footy fandom would be such a good way for him to sneak in some palestine support#he could just like a post by a player you know? instead of saying something#and it would still be a risk and a statement... but also one that could slide in like listen#I like posts by football players every day what?#or even jsut one about it being fucked up that so and so got fired by their club for making statements#so many layers of remove that could be ustilized#anarchism#comrade louis#blah blah blah#PS note for non brits (not that I am) number 10 refers to number 10 downing st the england equivalent of the white house basically so like#the government
54 notes
·
View notes
Text
VP Kamala Harris is calling for immediate ceasefire in Gaza
I was alerted to this by the BBC Global News podcast. AP News has a full article on the speech itself, which was not held about Israel and Palestine, but was rather focused on domestic issues of race equality, as the speech was given in Selma, Alabama, on the anniversary of Bloody Sunday (a 1965 Civil Rights march that ended in police violence). There is also a Reuters article if you prefer those.
Despite VP Harris's incredible dedication to the topic of combating anti-black racism in the US and position as a figurehead and spokeswoman for many in that regard, she did find time in her speech for the following:
THINGS OF NOTE:
Harris is still, technically, holding to the party line on the topic of 'Israel has a right to defend itself.' At this point, I'm sure we've all seen enough arguments on whether or not that right is something Israel actually has, given its violations of the international laws of occupation, but it does read to me as more lip service than actual sincerity at this point.
Harris puts the onus of agreeing to a ceasefire on Hamas, rather than Israel. Given Netanyahu's months of explicit refusal to consider a ceasefire unless Hamas is completely and utterly destroyed (and with them, Gaza), this is... not great. Not great. She said, "Hamas claims it wants a ceasefire. Well, there is a deal on the table. And as we have said, Hamas needs to agree to that deal. Let’s get a ceasefire. Let’s reunite the hostages with their families. And let’s provide immediate relief to the people of Gaza."
The 'immediate ceasefire' is still just the 6-week pause that Biden has been talking about, rather than a permanent one.
The speech included "The Israeli government must do more to significantly increase the flow of aid. No excuses." This statement is interesting to look at in light of the US recently hitting a watershed moment and beginning airdrops of relief aid, something so inefficient that they were reluctant to engage with it until given no other choice. The preference was trucks, which are more efficient in terms of quantity, fuel usage, risk of damage from wind blowing things off course, etc. The 'no other choice' is in regards to whether or not the trucks could still get in, not in regards to international or domestic pressure, though that was likely a factor as well.
We got what I believe are some of the harshest and most direct criticisms of Israel's actions so far: "What we are seeing every day in Gaza is devastating. We have seen reports of families eating leaves or animal feed. Women giving birth to malnourished babies with little or no medical care, and children dying from malnutrition and dehydration. Our hearts break for the victims of that horrific tragedy and for all the innocent people in Gaza who are suffering from what is clearly a humanitarian catastrophe. People in Gaza are starving. The conditions are inhumane."
These comments are receiving international coverage, though I'm a bit concerned by how... blase and unconcerned Israeli media seems to be, though since this particular journal (Times of Israel) claims to be non-partisan, maybe that's why? That said, Al Jazeera is also calling it a 'rare rebuke,' which I would guess is a good sign for the shifting of DC's position on the subject when combined with the recent aid drops.
As usual, I am not a political expert, I just like to gather and share information; please go to actual experts when trying to understand what politicians' actions mean. I do, however, want you to call your reps. Here's a guide on how to do it.
To support my blogging so I can move out of my parents' house, I do have a ko-fi. Alternately, you can donate to one of the charities I list in this post.
#gaza#united states#israel#palestine#call your reps#kamala harris#bloody sunday#current events#phoenix politics#death mention#child death mention
99 notes
·
View notes
Note
The "Left" has been braying about fascism for years and yet, and YET, I know none of them have even skimmed a single sentence of Ur-Fascism by Umberto Eco. If you've read it, you'll immediately start saying "Oh that's Hamas!" at basically every point he made.
Hamas has used some of the most conservative and harsh readings of Islamic theology to create a cult of tradition, they fundamentally reject modernity as an evil plague of the West, they call on Palestinians to "resist" and "struggle" and plan grandiose attacks like 10/7 with no real concrete long term tenable goals that can be gleaned- action for action's sake.
Disagreement is treason, that much is obvious. Children in preschool are taught to fear and hate Jews (fear of difference), and at the same time teach the "middle" classes that Jews are responsible for their economic hardship as if they aren't embezzling tens of millions of dollars from a global charity scam, that Jews are ever seeking to take more land and resources.
Hamas is obsessed with a Plot, that plot being every antisemitic conspiracy theory under the sun. They and their supporters believe all of them, or prime their own brains to stumble down those pipelines at a later date. My personal favorites include the Ben Gurion Canal Project, but they're all sub-plots of the Main Plot; Jews are seeking to supplant us.
Hamas frames themselves and Palestinian society as a whole as both too strong to consider humble negotiated peace, and to justify endless warfare, but also too weak to be responsible for their crimes, too pathetic for Israel to ever be justified in taking military action. It's a constant cycle of hyping themselves up as a group of badass radical warriors and then squealing "no fair" when Israel uses modern weaponry to swat them away.
I'm sure there's also contempt for the weak in Gazan society, but it doesn't immediately jump out at me from Hamas' propaganda machine (this is usually shunted onto Jews anyway, who are seen as effeminate and metropolitan, feeding into that simultaneous strength and weakness thing- Israel is weak and unworthy of life, but too powerful they're the bullies actually).
Hamas literally educates everyone to become a hero, they literally groom young boys into becoming radicalized child soldiers who do not have the frontal cortex development to resist such blatant brainwashing. It's literal child abuse. Palestinian women are pretty obviously seen as chattel who must breed the future army that will finally overwhelm Al-Yahood. There is no aspect of Gazan society that can exist for itself, it must all be part of the Struggle against Israel. And everyone, down to the tiniest baby, must play their part.
The Machismo is so blatant it should be comical. But you don't gang rape Jewish women and humiliate and torture kids if you're secure in your masculinity. I mean, there is something emasculating about being constantly beaten and seeming to have no hope for your political goals... while also constantly telling yourself that you're a proud virile warrior and you and the People have the strength of will to accomplish anything... but then these people you see as subhuman and like kind of queer if you think about it... well they utterly crush you every time. And that is all to say nothing about how Hamas relates to feminism and gay rights. And also how Eco describes the Macho Fascist as using weapons as an ersatz phallic symbol and we see so many teenage boys in Gaza being handed guns and it's like oh... this one section of the essay could take years to unpack when it comes to Hamas.
And Hamas definitely treats the people of Gaza (if not all of Palestine) as having one will and one voice, individuality is not considered. We've seen them and their spineless NGO simps refuse to acknowledge that many many Gazans criticize them, protest against them, hold them equally responsible for their current suffering as Israel. There is no One Singular Leader who claims to represent Gazans/Palestinians but that could change at any moment honestly.
And I don't see any evidence of Newspeak, but I don't know Arabic so I don't know. I do see the Western Leftist allies of Hamas engage in Newspeak like behaviors though. But that brings me to my ultimate point of this long ass ask. The Western Hamas girlies are literally, not only legitimizing a fascist organization even though they purport to hate fascism more than anything. They're starting to reproduce fascist talking points, fascist ways of thinking, in their own activism and their own lives! They're starting to think, talk, and act like fascists when it comes to Israel and Palestine, and to Jews more broadly. They're entirely unaware of this because to recognize Hamas as fascists would be to add a LOT of gray into their black and white worldview. When they appropriate the Palestinian national struggle for their own narcissistic delusions of popular revolution in the West, they're taking actual fascist propaganda produced by a fascist organization and applying it to their own lives.
tl;dr, by every metric laid out by Eco, Hamas are fascists, the people who support them and make apologetics for them are (maybe unknowingly) becoming more like fascists themselves, the next few years and decades are going to thoroughly suck but Am Yisrael Chai.
.
64 notes
·
View notes
Text
As the winter chill hits and the energy crisis starts to become very real, it is hard to shake off the feeling that not only is suffering becoming normalised in this country, but those in power have an ever-decreasing interest in easing it.
Few examples are starker than the news that the NHS is trialling “heating prescriptions” to give to people who can’t pay their soaring energy bills. Some patients need electricity for disability equipment, such as ventilators, wheelchairs and feeding tube pumps. Others need to put the heating on to ward off stiff arthritic joints or to ease breathing. Warmth and electricity used to be human rights – now they’re medicine.
In his autumn statement earlier this month, the chancellor, Jeremy Hunt, pledged to target cost of living support to “the most vulnerable”. “British compassion”, he said, would be at the heart of government policy during these difficult times. Reality is turning out to be quite different. Those who rely on the state pension or benefits may have been given a reprieve with their payments being uprated with inflation, but they must get through a cold winter before the 10.1% rise kicks in next April. Even when it does arrive, thanks to historically low benefit rates, the increase won’t come close to covering the essentials.
Meanwhile, the government has promised additional energy help next year in the form of a cost of living payment of £900 for households on means-tested benefits, but only £150 for people on disability benefits. According to the money saving expert Martin Lewis, these unequal rules mean that thousands of disabled people and carers on particular benefits will miss out on £650.
That the government has chosen to tighten eligibility for the warm home discount, so that half a million households – many of which will include disabled people – could lose this support, just as energy costs spiral, is an insight into how much their pledge to protect “the vulnerable” is worth.
Talk to community groups and charities, and the impact of mounting bills is already showing. Over a third of families with seriously ill and disabled children have cut back or stopped using life-saving disability equipment because of rising energy costs, according to the charity Contact. Of those, 40% say this is making their child’s health worse.
Meanwhile, the Royal National Institute of Blind People reports that blind and partially sighted people are not turning on their specialist lighting, despite needing it to move around the home safely. The disability charity Scope tells me it has heard from disabled people who are considering turning off the personal alarms that are meant to trigger help if they fall, as they can no longer afford to run them. Many are already cutting back on showers; their disability means it takes longer for them to wash and each minute costs more money. Others have been forced to give up their personal assistants who help them get dressed and go out, as they had to choose between electricity and independence. Some admit they are feeling suicidal.
If this is ministers protecting “the most vulnerable”, we can only imagine what hurting them would look like. Just like when George Osborne utilised the term during the 2010 era of austerity, the “most vulnerable” narrative has never been about the government helping people in need – but excusing the fact that they aren’t. The myth is perpetuated that some people in life are inevitably vulnerable, a stagnant group created by nature rather than a government’s political choices. It conveniently shifts responsibility away from ministers, suggesting that, say, a wheelchair user is unable to live a full life because of their disability, not because the government is withholding necessary support.
Away from Westminister, the truth is that millions of people in the UK don’t know how they are going to make it through winter. The news that the poorest people will end up shelling out nearly a third of their income by next spring just to pay fuel bills shows how unsustainable all of this is. A GP’s prescription pad will not patch up the holes in the welfare state.
It is not fearmongering to suggest that without sufficient support this winter, people are going to die. Even without energy bills rising, nearly 10,000 people in the UK perish every year from living in a cold home; human beings frozen in their own front rooms.
An upcoming Christmas campaign to encourage the public to switch off their energy to save cash will help some families be more energy efficient, but it is little use for disabled families. If you use a ventilator 24/7, “cutting back on energy” is not an option.
It is only real action from ministers that will make a difference. There are solutions, such as an energy social tariff that provides a discounted rate for disabled and low-income customers, or bringing forward the one-off energy payments to this winter, and increasing the support given to those on disability benefits. The recent story of Kate Winslet donating £17,000 to pay for the electricity for a little girl’s life-support equipment reveals the alternative: energy companies collecting bloated profits, while desperate families beg for help.
Every disabled child should be able to keep their oxygen running through Christmas. No one should have to skip dinner to keep their wheelchair charged. These are hardly radical claims, nor ambitious ideals. They are the bare minimum that any wealthy society should be striving for, and a threshold Britain is bleakly failing to meet. This is the truth no minister will admit: if anyone is “vulnerable” this winter, it will be because this government has failed to help them.
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
Charities Dedicated to Combating Malnutrition: An Overview
The humanitarian crisis in Yemen has led to widespread malnutrition, affecting millions of people, particularly children. As the world grapples with the urgency of the situation, numerous charities are at the forefront, working tirelessly to combat malnutrition and provide essential aid to those in need. In this article, we delve into the critical role of charities dedicated to addressing malnutrition in Yemen, exploring avenues such as Yemen crisis donation, Yemen zakat, and the best charities to donate to in Yemen.
The Yemen Crisis: A Malnutrition Emergency:
Yemen has been grappling with a multifaceted crisis, exacerbated by conflict, economic instability, and political turmoil. One of the most dire consequences of this crisis is the widespread malnutrition affecting the population, especially children. The United Nations has repeatedly highlighted Yemen's plight, categorizing it as the world's worst humanitarian crisis.
Impact on Children: Malnutrition poses a severe threat to the health and well-being of children in Yemen. Lack of access to proper nutrition, clean water, and medical care has led to a staggering number of children facing acute malnutrition, with many at risk of life-threatening conditions.
Economic Challenges: The economic challenges faced by Yemeni families further compound the malnutrition crisis. Skyrocketing food prices, disrupted supply chains, and a collapsing economy have made it increasingly difficult for families to afford and access essential nutritional resources.
Humanitarian Response: Humanitarian organizations and charities have played a crucial role in addressing the malnutrition emergency in Yemen. Their efforts encompass providing food aid, medical assistance, and implementing long-term solutions to build resilience within communities.
Yemen Zakat: A Form of Charitable Giving:
Zakat, a fundamental tenet of Islam, emphasizes the obligation to give to those in need, particularly during times of crisis. Yemen zakat has become a significant avenue through which individuals can contribute to alleviating malnutrition and supporting humanitarian efforts in the country.
Islamic Philanthropy: Zakat is one of the Five Pillars of Islam, emphasizing the importance of charitable giving as a means of fulfilling one's religious duties. Many charitable organizations operating in Yemen actively engage in zakat initiatives to garner support for their malnutrition-focused programs.
Targeted Assistance: Yemen zakat is often directed toward specific programs addressing malnutrition, including providing nutritious food, medical treatment, and support for affected families. This targeted approach ensures that zakat funds contribute directly to combating the crisis at its core.
Collaboration with Charities: Charities dedicated to malnutrition relief in Yemen often collaborate with Islamic institutions and communities to facilitate zakat collection and distribution. This collaboration amplifies the impact of zakat contributions, reaching a broader audience in need.
Best Charities to Donate to in Yemen: Making an Impact:
Numerous charities have emerged as beacons of hope in the face of Yemen's malnutrition crisis. When considering a Yemen crisis donation, choosing the right charity is pivotal to ensuring that contributions are effectively utilized to make a meaningful impact.
World Food Programme (WFP): As one of the largest humanitarian organizations globally, WFP operates in Yemen, providing food assistance to those affected by the crisis. Donations to WFP contribute to vital programs aimed at combating malnutrition and hunger.
UNICEF: The United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) plays a crucial role in addressing the needs of children in Yemen. Donations to UNICEF support initiatives such as therapeutic feeding, vaccination campaigns, and the provision of clean water to combat malnutrition.
Save the Children: Save the Children operates extensively in Yemen, focusing on child protection, healthcare, and nutrition. Contributions to Save the Children aid in providing essential nutrition support to vulnerable children and families affected by malnutrition.
Islamic Relief: Islamic Relief is actively involved in Yemen, implementing projects that target malnutrition, healthcare, and livelihood support. Donations to Islamic Relief contribute to comprehensive programs that address the immediate needs of affected communities.
Yemen Aid: A charity specifically dedicated to addressing the crisis in Yemen, Yemen Aid focuses on providing humanitarian assistance, including nutrition programs, healthcare, and emergency relief. Donations directly support initiatives aimed at combating malnutrition.
How Yemen Charities Combat Malnutrition:
Charities dedicated to combating malnutrition in Yemen employ a multi-faceted approach to address the root causes of the crisis and provide immediate relief to those in need.
Food Distribution Programs: Charities organize food distribution programs to ensure that families have access to nutritious meals. These programs often include staples such as rice, beans, and fortified products to address malnutrition.
Nutritional Support for Children: Recognizing the vulnerability of children to malnutrition, charities implement specialized programs providing nutritional support, including therapeutic feeding for severely malnourished children.
Healthcare Services: Malnutrition is often accompanied by health complications. Charities provide healthcare services, including medical treatment, vaccinations, and access to clean water, contributing to overall well-being.
Community Empowerment: Long-term solutions involve empowering communities to become resilient to future crises. Charities engage in projects that focus on sustainable agriculture, livelihood support, and community development to address the root causes of malnutrition.
Call to Action: Making a Difference:
The urgency of the malnutrition crisis in Yemen necessitates collective action. Individuals around the world can make a difference by actively contributing to Yemen crisis donations, supporting zakat initiatives, and choosing reputable charities to best charity to donate to yemen ..
Stay Informed: Keeping abreast of the latest developments in Yemen and understanding the specific needs of affected communities is crucial. Information empowers individuals to make informed decisions about where their contributions can have the most significant impact.
Donate Responsibly: When making a Yemen crisis donation, it's essential to donate to reputable and transparent charities. Research the organizations, verify their credentials, and ensure that your contributions directly benefit those affected by malnutrition.
Spread Awareness: Amplifying awareness about the malnutrition crisis in Yemen and the ongoing humanitarian efforts is a powerful way to mobilize support. Utilize social media, community networks, and conversations to raise awareness and encourage others to contribute.
Advocate for Change: Beyond donations, advocating for policies and international efforts to address the root causes of the crisis is essential. Encourage governments and policymakers to prioritize humanitarian aid, peacebuilding, and conflict resolution in Yemen.
Conclusion: A Collective Effort to Combat Malnutrition:
Charities dedicated to combating malnutrition in Yemen serve as lifelines for communities grappling with the devastating consequences of the crisis. Through Yemen crisis donations, zakat contributions, and support for reputable charities, individuals can contribute to a collective effort aimed at alleviating suffering, providing hope, and building a foundation for a more resilient future in Yemen.
0 notes
Text
If you enjoy this please follow @RussInCheshire on twitter for his regular threads on UK politics.
As it’s the weekend, let’s start #TheWeekInTory with a frivolous and jolly story about our own govt deliberately starving hundreds of thousands of children...
1. In May, Boris Johnson promised “nobody will go hungry as a result of Coronavirus”
2. He then denied school meals to the 600,000 poorest children
3. So Marcus Rashford ran a campaign to get the govt to feed children, which - just think about that: he had to *campaign* for it
4. Then Boris Johnson congratulated Rashford on his campaign to overturn the cruel policies of, erm, Boris Johnson
5. And then 3 days later, Boris Johnson refused to feed those kids during school holidays
6. So this week Labour organised a parliamentary vote about it
7. And 322 Tories voted against feeding hungry children
8. Vicky Ford, the Children’s Minister (who you’ll be surprised to hear neither looks nor sounds like a ludicrous Dickensian villain) went ahead and voted against feeding children
9. Tory MP Jo Gideon voted against feeding children. Jo Gideon, in case you didn't think things could get any more unbelievable, is also the chair of "Feeding Britain", a charity that campaigns to end food poverty and hunger in the UK.
10. Tory MP Paul Scully waved away the grumbling parents of kids with grumbling tummies, and said “children have been going hungry under Labour for years”, seemingly forgetting Tories have been in power for a decade
11. Tory MP Ben Bradley, who once had to apologise for suggesting sterilising the poor, said feeding children will simply “increase their dependency”. On food. Yeah, wean the little bastards off it. It’ll do them good in the end, which will be around 3 agonising weeks.
12. At this point, pause to consider that MPs get their food and drink subsidised. A £31 meal in a parliamentary restaurant costs MPs £3.45. In 2018 this subsidy cost the taxpayer £4.4m. I can’t find any record of Tories like Ben Bradley voting against this.
13. Pressing on: Ben Bradley also said “Some parents prioritise other things ahead of their kids. Small minority, yes... but some do”. Yes, and a small minority of Tory MPs have been arrested for rape. Should we send them all to prison?
14. Also, Mark Francois voted (by proxy) to keep kids hungry. Not related to the previous item. Why would you think that?
15. Tory MP Nicky Morgan said the govt voted to starve 600,000 children cos a Labour MP called a Tory MP scum. And that’s not a scummy thing to do at all.
16. Tory MP David Simmonds said Marcus Rashford’s experience of poverty in secondary school “took place entirely under a Labour government”. Rashford was 11 when Tories came into power, making David Simmonds are rare example of an ad hominem attack on yourself
17. Simmonds then said Labour’s parliamentary vote was “all about currying favour with wealth and power and celebrity status”. He might be right – the govt managed to unify Gary Linaker and Nigel Farage in condemnation of their denial of food to kids
18. Brandan Clark-Smith (who voted to starve kids) demanded “more action to tackle the real causes of child poverty”
19. So at once, the govt cut minimum wage for furloughed people. They now get 2/3 of the money the govt says is the absolute minimum it is possible to survive on
20. And then it was revealed that low-paid workers who have to isolate due to Covid can claim £500. Yay!
21. But if they’re told to isolate by the govt’s contact tracing app, they can’t claim anything. Un-yay.
22. Long story short: the govt cannot spend £120m feeding children. But it can spend £522 on the Eat Out Scheme, which its own report said contributed “negligible amounts” to the hospitality economy, and Boris Johnson admitted drove up infection rates – especially in the North
23. Those infection rates caused the govt to move Manchester into Tier 3
24. So the Mayor of Manchester asked for a £90m support package (1/6th of the money the govt spent causing the problem in the first place)
25. The govt said no, £60m
26. The Mayor said, how about £65m?
27. The govt said no, £60m
28. The Mayor said ok, fine, we’ll take the £60m
29. And then govt offered Manchester £22m, and then went to the press and said the Mayor was "being unreasonable"
30. The negotiations were led by Robert Jenrick, who recently set up a fund for the poorest 101 towns, then awarded his town £25m even though it is the 270th poorest, and therefore not even eligible
31. £25m is £237 per person
32. Manchester gets £7.85 per person
33. Robert Jenrick gave Manchester (2.8 million people) £22m
34. Robert Jenrick gave Richard Desmond (1 person) £45m
35. The talks broke down when the govt wouldn’t spend an extra £5m
36. The govt plans to spend £7m vitally rebranding "Highways England" to "National Highways"
37. Manchester Young Conservatives tweeted “Boris has lied about helping us in the North. It’s time for him to go". Don't look - they deleted it. Suspect somebody had a word.
38. Meanwhile the govt said Manchester will get the £60m after all, and chaos continue to reign supreme
39. But that £60m is brief reprieve for the Tories of Manchester, as a govt report said Tory seats in the North of England (the so-called "Red Wall" seats) can expect to lose at least 4000 jobs *each* as a result of Brexit, even if we do get a deal. More if we don't.
40. The govt rushed to begin its first airport Coronavirus testing, a mere 211 days after mandatory airport testing was begun in South Korea
41. South Korea has had 8 deaths per million
42. The UK has had 665 deaths per million
43. More airport news, as the govt finally accepted Brexit will cause “up to 8-hour delays at passport checks” and asked the EU to allow UK citizens to queue at EU-only lanes. Like we did when we were in the EU. But we aren’t now. So tough.
44. A senior diplomat said, “Having grown up in Brussels, Boris Johnson values the ability to travel freely to the continent”. You’d think Boris Johnson would foresee this problem when he led the campaign to stop that freedom.
45. The independent reviewer of Terrorism Legislation said the UK “will be increasingly unable to cope” after Brexit, as we lose access to EU data-sharing agreements
46. And a No-Deal end to UK/EU scientific collaboration will leave London with a £3bn annual deficit
47. In the space of 38 days, the govt announced the £100bn "Operation Moonshot" to solve Covid; then cancelled it; and then re-launched it again after it was found they’d accidentally continued to pay over 200 private consultants up to £7000 a day to work on it.
48. So this week, Boris Johnson said Moonshot would continue, but it’s goals “would take time”, which is the literal opposite of what he said it would do when it first announced it, and makes the entire thing absolutely pointless
49. And now it’s been admitted that Operation Moonshot would be quietly folded into the existing £12bn Test and Trace programme, and the £100bn has vanished. Apart from the bits the Serco consultants took for doing… nothing.
50. But Boris Johnson said the Test and Trace programme was “helping a bit”, and “a bit” is the least you’d expect if you’d spent £12bn
51. And then the £12bn Test and Trace programme fell to its lowest success rate so far, identifying only 60% of at-risk people
52. Local councils, with no additional funding, are tracing 98% of cases
53. A quick sweep though other epic successes you may have missed (or deliberately blocked out): Equalities minister Kemi Badenoch declared that it should be illegal to teach about inequality
54. The Cabinet Secretary said the report into “vicious and orchestrated” bullying by Home Secretary and Dementor Priti Patel “may never see the light of day”, cos if you have a report that vindicates you, you definitely sit on it as long as possible
55. And the appeals court unanimously overturned Priti Patel’s policy of removing people from the UK without giving them access to legal process or justice because – and I’m paraphrasing the judges here – what the fuck, Patel? What the actual fuck?
56. Undeterred, she announced plans to make rough-sleeping “grounds for removal of permission to be in the UK” and "denial of legal aid". So if you’re too poor to have a home, you must pay for a lawyer or she’ll shove you in the sea
57. After an unnamed Tory MP said it “looks bad to be handing top jobs to your friend and old boss”, Charles Moore, Boris Johnson’s friend and old boss, withdrew as next BBC chair.
58. The new favourite is Richard Sharp, the - yep - friend and old boss of Rishi Sunak
59. You’ll be amazed to hear this: Richard Sharp is a major donor to the Tory party. These little coincidences keep on happening
60. The govt decided to prevent EU citizens from having physical proof of their right to live in their own home
61. Grant Shapps threatened to “seize control of Transport for London” to save it from financial ruin at the hands of Sadiq Khan, who – the bastard - achieved a mere 71% reduction in the debts caused by his noble predecessor, Boris Johnson
62. Matt Hancock, facts at his fingertips, told MPs from Yorkshire their constituents could go on holiday abroad
63. But not in the UK
64. And then that they CAN go on holiday in the UK
65. But can't leave Yorkshire
66. He then said “I'll get back to you” about the details
67. A cross-party report found “the UK’s foreign policy is adrift”, that it lacks “clarity, confidence and vision” and that Britain is “absent from the world stage”. All of which is very soothing, as we move into the govt's proclaimed goal of a post-Brexit Global Britain.
68. And we can all relax: the govt is finally supporting culture in the UK, specifically the Nevill Holt Opera, which performs private operas, and is owned by Boris Johnson’s friend (and - jaw on floor! - Tory donor) David Ross, who is worth £700m so really needs the money.
69. The Nevill Holt Opera only functions in the summer, so thank god it has been prioritised with £85,000 to “maintain operations” in October.
And now, in honour of the opera, the fat lady can sing, cos I’m off to drink myself into oblivion. Join me.
We live in interesting times.
15 notes
·
View notes
Text
ISLAM 101: Muslim Culture and Character: Morals And Manners: Buildinf Good Character
The topic of this book, “adab in practice,” is part of the larger concept of akhlaq, that is, morality. In fact, from one perspective, adab in practice is fundamentally practical morality and ethics. Therefore, the essence of these concepts will be explained first, beginning with a short introduction to akhlaq, and only after this will adab in practice be returned to.
Akhlaq, the plural of khuluq in Arabic, means the character and temperament of a person. The temperament of a person brings either good or harmful things. In the broadest aspect morality means that there is a moral character, that is, morality becomes deeply ingrained in the soul and as a consequence right actions and behavior come naturally and easily from within; then, the per- son with such a character no longer has to struggle intellectually to know what ethical choices to make.
Human characteristics can generally be divided into those that society approves of and those that we disapprove of. Decency, hu- mility, and kindness are traits that are seen in a positive light, while arrogance, deceit, and miserliness are generally perceived as negative human characteristics. To recognize these characteristics and their attendant traits is to understand what is meant here by the phrase “moral character.” Nawwas ibn Saman once asked the Prophet how to recognize the difference between goodness and sin. The Prophet answered, “Goodness is good moral character. Sin is anything that pricks one’s conscience, and which one does not want others to know about.”1 Another narration from Jabir re- ports that the Messenger said, “The most beloved to me among you and the ones who will be closest to me on the Day of Judgment are the best in moral character. And they who are most loathsome to me and will be farthest from me on the Day of Judgment are those who gossip, those with unbridled tongues, and those who condescend.” When they asked him, “O Messenger of God! Who are those who condescend?” he replied, “They are those who are arrogant.”2
Ethics, which is the study or science of morals, can be divided into the theoretical and the practical. While theoretical morality is concerned with those concepts that constitute the principles and rules of morality, practical morality is concerned with the duties that constitute the basis of a moral life. As reported by the Prophet, “God looks not at your outward appearances, nor at your wealth or belongings. God looks only at your hearts and your deeds.”3 For this reason, here we will be mainly concerned with the practical side of morality, and as mentioned above, the pur- pose of this book is to explore adab in practice. At this point, with a view to clarifying the meaning of human responsibility, let us take a closer look at the concept of duty, which is pivotal to devel- oping a good character with adab.
THE NATURE AND TYPES OF DUTY
Duty is the moral responsibility of a person who has reached pu- berty when they have been asked to do something good or help- ful. Accordingly, Islamically there are two types of duty. One is the obligatory (fard) group of duties, that is, those the perfor- mance of which is binding and the abandonment of which is for- bidden. For example, performing daily prayers, fasting during the holy month of Ramadan, and offering prescribed purifying alms fall into this category. The other type of duty is that which, al- though not obligatory, is encouraged or desirable; it is these du- ties that religion presents as being inherent parts of a good moral character. To observe these duties on top of the obligatory ones shows greater spiritual maturity and is worthy of Divine reward; the observation of them pleases God. To neglect such duties would be a shortcoming. An example of this type of duty would be the giving of money or goods to those in need (sadaqa), over and above the prescribed purifying alms (zakat), and generally being kind and polite to everyone.
Duties can further be classified as those fulfilled in the cause of God, or for the benefit of the individual, family, or even soci- ety. From this perspective, duties can be divided into different sorts—divine, familial, and social duties. Let us more closely ex- amine these categories.
Divinely-Ordained Duties
It is incumbent upon every person who has come of age and who is in possession of all their mental faculties that they recognize and worship God. For a human there can be no greater blessing or honor than this servitude to God. One worships God by willingly and gratefully performing acts of worship, such as daily prayers, fasting, charity, and such other commitments that require both physical and financial abilities, like the pilgrimage to Mecca. In ad- dition to these duties that pertain to the personal practice of Islam, safeguarding and defending one’s homeland is also a sacred duty.
Another very important divine duty is to struggle against one’s own evil-commanding soul. Those who cannot discipline their ego or self through moral education will not be able to help themselves, let alone society. Believers, both as individuals and members of soci- ety, need to exert themselves to strive in the way of God in all their actions at all moments of life. This is what Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him, meant when he said, “We are re- turning from the lesser jihad (struggle) to the greater,” while he was returning to Medina from the Campaign of Tabuk.4 Emphasizing that they were returning from “the lesser struggle to the greater,” the Prophet directed his Community to this “greater struggle” that is waged against one’s carnal self at all moments of life.
Being this comprehensive in nature, jihad includes every ac- tion, from the simplest act of speaking to remaining silent or per- forming supererogatory acts of worship, such as extra prayers, worship and fasting to attain the good pleasure of God. Likewise, to enlighten our hearts we can read the Qur’an, or to increase the light of our faith we can continually remember and reflect on the Divine Attributes of our Almighty Creator that are manifest all around us.
Individual Duties
Each person has some duties toward their own self as well. Some of these pertain to the body, and some to the spirit. The following are the main duties that fall into this category:
Training the body: For everyone it is crucial that the body be kept strong and clean. Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “A strong and vigorous be- liever is better than a frail and weak one.”5
Caring for one’s health: Health is a great blessing; there- fore, it is vital to avoid things that may damage one’s health and to seek treatment when one is ill.
Refraining from dangerous practices of abstinence or self- denial practiced in the name of spiritual discipline.
Guarding against things that wear down and age the body.
Strengthening willpower: A person needs to develop healthy self-control. This involves learning what is good for the body and partaking of it, as well as finding out what is harmful and avoiding it.
Duties relating to the mind and intellect, such as pursuing learning and enlightenment, awakening higher emotions and positive feelings in the heart, and honing one’s talents and skills.
Family Duties
The family is the very foundation of a healthy society. Each mem- ber of the family must accept some responsibility for the others in the family. Some of the primary duties of a husband, for instance, are to behave kindly toward his wife, to meet her basic needs, and to be loyal to her. A narration of the Prophet says, “The best of you is he who is the best to his wife.”6 A wife who is happy with her spouse will support her husband’s decisions, as long as they do not conflict with religious directives and contribute to protecting the family honor and property. All these are pivotal to happiness in marital relations and to a happy family.
Parents in such an atmosphere commit themselves to nurtur- ing, educating and training their children to the best of their ability, setting them on the path to success in life. Fathers and mothers should treat their children equally, holding them in equal regard and affection. They should be gentle towards their offspring, and raise them in such a way that they will not be inclined to rebel. Parents also have the duty to be models of virtue for their children.
Respect and obedience are, in turn, some of the basic duties of children towards parents who have brought them up according to the principles set out above and with love and compassion, feeding and caring for them. This is why children should not show displeasure or impatience with their parents. A son or daughter who ignores the wishes of their parents and does not heed them nor come to their assistance if they are in need is not a source of blessing for the parents. Such a person not only is not a useful member of society, but will also stand before God as one who is guilty of shirking their duty.
Likewise, siblings have duties toward one another, such as showing affection and compassion for each other, as well as help- ing and respecting each other. There is a very strong bond be- tween brothers and sisters and this should be maintained at all times. Brothers and sisters who cut their ties with one another over finances or property disagreements cannot be considered to be blessed or benevolent. Finally, if a household has hired help, this helper also must be treated as part of the family. They deserve kindness and gentle treatment and should never be overloaded with work that is too difficult for them to carry out.
Social Duties
Human beings have been created as social beings, and as such they live in social groups and have formed civilizations. Socializing is one of our basic needs, and social life involves certain expectations between people. When these are disregarded, society breaks down and people can no longer coexist peacefully or work together. The main responsibilities in this category are the preservation of the following inalienable rights:
Protecting the life of every individual: Every person has the right to life. No one has the right to take another person’s life. According to Islam, one who wrongfully kills a per- son is as guilty as if they have murdered all of humanity; likewise, one who saves one person’s life is as blessed as if they have saved all of humanity.
Safeguarding the freedom of all people: God Almighty cre- ated every human being free and equal. At the same time, it is certain that this freedom has boundaries. We do not have the prerogative to do anything we want; if we had such freedom this would violate the freedoms of others.
The consideration of conscience: When a person has a well- functioning conscience, this allows them to differentiate between good and bad. The value of such a conscience can be better understood if one observes outward consequenc- es. A person who engages in incorrect behavior cannot be said to have a functioning conscience. Islam assigns great importance to having a conscience that helps one to be concerned for the happiness and guidance of all humanity.
To this end, it encourages pity towards those who have a faulty conscience, and tries to bring them to the right way. One can never try to control or rule another person’s con- science; this is the province of God alone. Each person will be rewarded or punished for what is in their con- science. However, this does not mean it is wrong to ad- monish or advise a person who has a bad conscience, if the idea is to help the person.
Protecting freedom of mind: Any thought or opinion, right or wrong, must be approached in a scholarly man- ner. This is the only way for a truth to be discovered, and it is also the only way for society to prove the harmfulness of false ideas.
Protecting the honor and reputation of individuals: In Islam, everyone has the right to maintain their honor and dignity. Any attack against honor or dignity, we have been taught, will be gravely punished. It is for this reason that gossip, slander, ridicule, the cursing of others and saying negative things about others are absolutely forbidden in Islam.
The preservation of other people’s property: It is also for- bidden to usurp the property or possessions of any other person. What is earned by a person belongs strictly to that person. This is essential for the development of a civilized society. It is reasonable and necessary that the individuals who make up a society will have different degrees of wealth, according to their profession and training. In a fair and equitable society all should be grateful for and sat- isfied with their own portion.
#allah#god#islam#muslim#quran#revert#convert#convert islam#revert islam#reverthelp#revert help#revert help team#help#islamhelp#converthelp#prayer#salah#muslimah#reminder#pray#dua#hijab#religion#mohammad#new muslim#new revert#new convert#how to convert to islam#convert to islam#welcome to islam
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
THE MESS WE ARE IN & THE ROLE OF PREACHERS
By Shaykh Hamdi Ben Aissa
Among those I hold responsible for the miserable state our Ummah is in today are Muslim preachers. Many of them are responsible for pushing ordinary people - our neighbors and fellow citizens - to actions that destroy them and others.
Whenever there is a report of a Muslim experiencing Islamophobia or an act of violence, some preachers jump with great glee on the occasion to make political declarations, cite the smallest incidents as proof of our collective victimhood, and stir up anger in those prone to such reactions - all without even knowing the names of the victims or expressing condolences to their families.
One must ask: are the victims actually only incidental, secondary to the advancement of other goals these preachers have? Are the actual humans nothing more than pawns?
These preachers are constantly stirring the pot with Muslim youth, stoking fires of discontent based on a narrative of victimization, and a seemingly relentless tide of Islamophobia. Such a narrative fits perfectly with their agenda of religion as identity politics.
Yet it is these same Muslim preachers who have caused major divisions within the Muslim community, pitting youth against their elders as they encourage children to see parents and grandparents as lesser Muslims or even outside the fold of true Islam. They have alienated an entire generation from centuries-old traditions by making spirituality appear irrelevant and out of date, unmooring people from their foundations and leaving them grasping for some form of culture that might express their spirits - yet finding none. And they have fed and continue to feed an anxiety in people based on the idea that most people are misguided, and only a lucky few are guided, and it is easy to fall out of the lucky group into the unlucky one, so be afraid! All of this has left people gasping for some kind of meaning, and thus susceptible to propaganda.
These preachers scoff at anything to do with love and peace, cutting down that kind of teaching with mockery and sarcasm, thus shutting the door on those two concepts for Muslim youth. They even mock the expression of spiritual experience as being too new-agey and not solid enough for the real world.
Their focus is not on religion as an attachment to God and an interaction with the Unseen world of Angels, Prophets, goodness and hope, but rather on this world. They feed off the youthful energy and easily-evoked anger of our young people, manipulate these precious souls for their own nihilistic aims. They are parasites, not preachers.
These preachers insist on spreading unfriendly information, sharing articles and videos that highlight hate, and in general, muddying the waters so that youth don't know where to find true guidance and are forced to hang onto the preachers' definition of guidance, i.e: righteous anger at world events.
We have tried to dialogue with these preachers, asking them to ease up on their isolationist rhetoric, but they ignore our messages and continue to divide people from each other.
It is time we seriously address the danger of these irresponsible Muslim preachers.
The Prophet of God peace be upon him taught us that on the Day of Judgment, the first three people who will be brought before God are a preacher, a rich man who gave much charity, and a man who fought for justice by giving up his very life.
God will ask the speaker/preacher: do you acknowledge the gifts I gave you: your brilliance, your intelligence, your ability to reach people, your influence, the fact that people accepted and trusted you? Do you recognize these gifts?
The person will say: yes, I acknowledge all this.
God will say: What did you do with these gifts?
The preacher will say: I was calling people to You, I was preaching.
God will say: You were not doing that for Me.
You were not preaching out of concern and care for the people.
That is to say: the fuel of your words was not a feeling of duty towards the people, a genuine desire for their well-being and benefit, but something else. The fuel that moved your words was your desire to gain and maintain popularity, win a following, make a name, or earn a buck. Or, to further an ideology that you wanted to spread at any price, to promote an idea that you wanted to become famous for, no matter the moral consequences. Or your motivation was nationalism, or some other cause of this world - not the Hereafter. You were not addressing people in order to help them become better people for their Creator.
Likewise, the second and third man will be questioned by God, and again they will be found lacking in genuine concern for supporting the well-being of others.
These three categories of people are called the kindling of the fire of hell, that which is used to start up the fire of the Hereafter. The realities of the Hereafter are reflections of the spiritual realities of the here and now. Those who start the fire of hell in the hereafter are those who start the fires of hellishness in this life. Since such people serve only their own interests, they say and do things that make people into enemies of one another, and they ignite an internal state of hell in those who listen to them. For what is worse than looking for guidance, and being given only anger to work with? That is exactly what is happening to so many of our youth. And it is a crime beyond measure to do that to them. For, eventually, the fire of anger will burn itself out, and all that will be left are ashes, and no light. Is this something you can stand by and accept to watch happen to youth after youth? What follows their zealous anger at politics? does humble faith ever come to grow in their hearts? or do they eventually turn away from religion altogether!
Behind every problem we face today are a crooked preacher, a crooked placement of money, and someone fighting the wrong fight in the wrong way. Behind every problem are those who speak in the wrong way and for the wrong reasons; those who put their money towards the wrong causes, with the wrong intentions; and those who go out and fight the wrong fight, for the wrong reasons. We need to think deeply about this and ponder the everlasting truth of the words of our Messenger peace be upon him, as well as the warning they contain. It is time to heed the warning.
God has blessed some of us with eloquence, in order for our words to become means to help others understand things, to help others grow. Facebook is a tongue, and we must learn to restrain our tongues from saying that which does not benefit. Consider how you write and share posts. Make sure you are doing so truly for the benefit of others. Ask yourself a simple question every time you share a post: does my sharing this bring benefit to others?
My brothers and sisters, today everyone is a victim in some way. We are all victims, living in a world in which practically no one - not governments, not businesses, not even parents at times - do things for the sake of our well-being - where most people serve only their own interests. We need to be here for each other, to support and help one other grow and mature, in a world that is not helping us to do so. We must demystify the image we have been given of one another, by false preachers, false promoters, false fighters. Let us come together in the light of the Real.
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
Everywhere I go I see these ‘morning’ novels about ‘getting life right the first time through.’ All these Asian girls I dated year after year and they expect / demand me to be totally established and take all their abuse - I will not complain more than that - when what I’ve wanted for a long time is literally ‘to live like an immigrant in one’s own country.’ All the people I admire seemingly married young such as the current Korean president and former UN Secretary General.
I keep thinking, ‘That ultra-miraculous Hail Mary 80K-or-so YA novel that will get me out of here and also annihilate all the evil YA novels that I hate and want to expurgate from BN, the libraries etc.’ The wolf-child teenage-assassin good-to-be-gay ultra-sensualize-Asian-girls good-to-get-raped good-to-be-anorexic good-to-hate good-to-be-cynical etc.
I tried to support ‘Finding My Voice’ author Marie Ok Myung Lee on Twitter b/c I saw ‘Finding My Voice’ at BN and went, ‘OMG they took Kim Minju’s face and it’s right there.’ I lived in KR; I don’t mistake faces; YA is ripping K-pop left and right but Minju’s a real person with a life, had panic-attacks, needed exogenous O2 from trying to ‘honor’ her fans. I wrote Minju ‘greentext fics’ talking about chivalry on 4chan but instead of motivating NEET’s to get a life or at least value and honor women it had people talking about rape, and various techniques of what might be called slave-breaking or the ways in which slavers and human traffickers so damage their human chattel as to render them unlikely to escape. Jordan Peterson on Twitter is defending 4chan for its truthyness I guess (despite JBP’s having dreams of Christ and the kings of this Earth bowing down after trying to smash each other), and also pointlessly dueling / debating actual rape- and trafficking-victim Yeonmi Park, a North Korean escapee, due to the fact that JBP is ultra-rich and invested in his brand / identity and probably delaying Christianity as long as possible. Marie Lee also got embroiled in a pretty pointless debate with a smart but mercenary Tory Toffish British professor called Dave Tizzard over precisely how much incendiary was dropped on to North Korean people and they’re still battling each other over God-knows-what. My parents also recently tried to duel me to the death over my interest in supporting Liberty in North Korea; about which my Dad said, ‘If you try to enter North Korea I will cut you off.’ I’m a communist defector for being anti-communist because this is 2021 in Babylon and reality is unreality. I’m sorry if I sound like Ben Shapiro but honestly facts and those ho handle them are sometimes more important to the art / science caring than narratives, the ashes of experience, personality, etc. People such as Joe Biden also appear to oppose food-relief to North Korea on the grounds that it will prop up the regime and, say, if we feed North Koreans they might have excess energy and actually develop WMD’s and non-conventional capabilities that could threaten the US; an eventuality we prevented in the past by making sure NK starved in the 1990s and also by disarming NK’s WMD operation in Iraq in 2003.
All jokes aside NK policy strikes me as incredibly mentally ill and by that I mean spiritually depraved (I really think so), racist, genocidal / annhilationist, desiring to erase both souls / individuals and history, confused, scared. IDK if I am allowed to even say that but I have a ‘black swan’ theory of history / WW3 in which some of the formerly colonized nations, such as NK and SRV (Socialist Republic of Vietnam), basically take over the world using special forces because in a way they deserve it and also because they know what it’s like to be on the receiving end of both malevolent colonial power and pseudo-benevolent or well-meaning-but-stupid-and-cowardly-and-non-committed paternal colonialism / imperialism. It could appear outlandish but if you study certain battles in history you find there are critical factors in terms of information, will, ‘moral factor,’ technology, the Hand of God.
I ultimately believe many of us on the Earth will have new neighbors very soon and we must honor them with worthy offerings, both out of justice and out of love for their souls (a-ga-pe, caritas / Charity). During the pandemic I repeatedly read Chancellor / Dr. / Pastor John Piper’s ‘Coronavirus and Christ’ as well as Francis Chan’s ‘Forgotten God’ about the Holy Spirit and how to invite(?) His counsel, comfort, wisdom, orders.
To anyone and everyone who might be reading this someday I also recommend highly Catherine Cho’s ‘Inferno’ which is about post-partum psychosis, mental healthcare in the United States, motherhood, demons, all of which are factors currently of critical importance to a lot of us. I had written a poem for Literary Shanghai which I think was accepted but which I then rescinded about ‘Inferno’ describing my own experiences with mental healthcare and terror of Hell and the Spirit. I had also spoken of a ‘Requiem’ which is something the pre-eminent English-language professor of the Korean War once called for though the essence of what might have happened during that conflict as well as what could happen again today is quite frankly literally a ‘Dies Irae,’ not the peaceful or nice part of the traditional requiem. I had actually wanted to write Korean War novels before I realized how mercenary this is about an operation codenamed Ripper under Gen. Ridgway, the part of the war that involved bullets as much as heavy bombers or whatever, huge masses of Chinese troops, situations of semi-indiscriminate firing into masses of Asians including refugees, not to mention numerous hapless boy-soldiers from China. All this stuff appears to be clawing its way out of the ground now - the Korean government recently awarded an American colonel in his 90′s for a certain unspecified action - but it’s 3:50 AM, billions born and unborn are at stake in other places, lands of miracle and menace, such as particularly Somalia with a birthrate that resembles that of the Republic of Korea prior to contraception etc., and I have personal problems to target and numerous ownership-issues when it comes to what is truly meant for me to do in the remains of my day(s).
It also appears that a large coterie / clique / posse of persons around here are obsessed with me magically forcing them to respect, cherish, etc. me which puts me in mind of my favorite K-pop song - maybe the only one I ought to care about anymore - (Ms. / Leader) Kim Taeyeon’s ‘Make Me Love You,’ which however was also released on the same day as a super-massive democidal chemical attack in Syria.
A while back I reflected somewhat - maybe not enough - on the idea of ‘counter-imperialism,’ by which I don’t mean Jean Paul Sartre or Mao or the Black Panthers, but using power, influence, etc. to circumscribe or delimit the excess ambitions of people who think they have the right idea but have lost their right minds or don’t really understand or care. At one point I thought wishfully, ‘America is like a counter-empire,’ but IDK if I was really thinking of America b/c to be a counter-empire by my definition you need control and reason and wisdom and SME (subject matter expertise), not just wishes.
I’m not sure any liberal democracy today has all these though my optimistic side looks to the current ROK president, Twitter moonriver365, who appears to be playing an almost impossible hand with literally every other country, flesh and spirit. I bought this leader’s autobiography but my Korean cuts in and out of comprehension. IDK if I’m too open-minded or not open-minded enough; I have my affections and I guess limerences (liking) as well. I don’t despise the current ruler of Russia either for he has been trying to do good things for a nation that paid a nearly incomprehensible price in WW2 (Great Patriotic War), and which was mocked and despised for no good reason by a smug West, which perhaps sunk into unworthiness of itself, after the first Cold War.
I remember looking at a picture the Moscow GPW memorial obelisk and being awed to tears - bodies and souls ascending into Heaven or hurled into Hell. Straight up, straight down. St. George and the dragon. ‘They are attacking again; are they mortal?’
However, I came to view this memorial partly whilst researching a fanciful Millennial anti-establishment curse-the-system-and-die novel about the mass-drowning of some 300 South Korean high school students in 2014.
I also made an effort to cultivate concern for children in the Midwest but somehow became sidetracked again just thinking about world events, the fact that every race is out to get every other race, these golden-haired Caucasian girls are probably taken to be ‘Little Women’ knockoffs or Henry James throwbacks or some Reddit category that can be easily demonized by Maoist flaks, BLM, anyone looking to score points or reduce the other in order to magnify the self and/or its tribal / identity-politics interests.
Over recent months I considered a lot - maybe still not enough - the categories or qualities of purpose; purity; and also presence.
0 notes
Text
This is what Donald and Melania Trump are sending Meghan and Harry as a wedding gift
yahoo
President and Melania Trump have revealed their wedding gift to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle: a cash donation.
Despite not receiving an invitation to the royal wedding on Saturday at St. George’s Chapel at Windsor Castle, the first couple is following wedding etiquette and sending a gift. “President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump will be making a contribution to one of the seven charities the royal couple has designated in lieu of gifts,” White House spokesperson Lindsay Walters said in a statement Friday to Us Weekly.
Donald and Melania Trump aren’t attending the royal wedding — but they are sending Meghan Markle and Prince Harry a gift. (Photo: Getty Images)
In April, Markle and Harry, whose family has a reported net worth of $88 billion, requested in a palace statement that in lieu of wedding gifts, fans should make a charitable donation.
“Prince Harry and Ms. Meghan Markle are incredibly grateful for the goodwill shown to them since the announcement of their engagement and are keen that as many people as possible benefit from this generosity of spirit,” read the statement. “The couple have therefore asked that anyone who might wish to mark the occasion considers making a donation to charity, rather than sending a wedding gift.”
The couple handpicked seven different U.K.-based organizations: CHIVA (Children’s HIV Association); Crisis, which aims to end homelessness; the Myna Mahila Foundation, which provides professional support for aspiring businesswomen; Scotty’s Little Soldiers, for bereaved armed forces children; StreetGames, a sports charity for low-income communities, Surfers Against Sewage, a national marine conservation; and the Wilderness Foundation U.K., a nature program for at-risk youth.
Meghan and Harry aren’t slighting the first couple by not inviting them — they’re simply following protocol. In April, a palace spokesperson said in a statement: “It has been decided that an official list of political leaders — both U.K. and international — is not required for Prince Harry and Ms. Markle’s wedding. Her Majesty’s Government was consulted on this decision, which was taken by The Royal Household.”
In September, the prince met Melania at the Invictus Games (a Paralympic event he created in 2014) in Toronto, Canada, and their meeting provoked controversy for a photo showing Harry making a hand sign that people called the “signal of the devil.” However, according to the Hill, the two exchanged pleasantries, with Harry remarking to FLOTUS “You’ve been very busy,” and she congratulating him on “doing a fantastic job.”
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are set to say “I do” on Saturday, May 19, at Windsor Castle. Yahoo will cover the historic event live from London from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. BST (British Summer Time), 5 a.m. to 10 a.m. ET. Bookmark this link to follow along live.
yahoo
Read more from Yahoo Lifestyle:
Meghan Markle’s father will skip the royal wedding to have a heart operation — here’s what’s going on
Here’s your first look at the royal wedding cake
Royal Wedding: Watch Prince Harry and Meghan Markle get married LIVE
Follow us on Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter for nonstop inspiration delivered fresh to your feed, every day.
#news#Kensington Palace#_uuid:e3270bac-e22a-37b6-9ef4-9500c27f084b#royal wedding#hidden:vv_16x09:937bdc8d-e07a-3713-8dc1-84651a66199b#prince harry#videos#video#hidden:vv_09x16:56e5fc67-355a-3368-9fe2-2ea0aec29c43#_lmsid:a0Vd000000AE7lXEAT#_revsp:wp.yahoo.style.us#melania trump#royals#the wilderness foundation uk#_author:Elise Solé#Scotty’s Little Soldiers#meghan markle#surfers against sewage#president trump
1 note
·
View note
Text
I Miss...
When I was a child, things were simple. Barbie had a house, Ken was faithful, and Malibu was a dream. McDonalds and Burger King were five star, restaurants, getting to the last swing on the playground was a goal, and being chosen for kickball was the ultimate test of friendship.
I now fully appreciate the protection innocents and ignorance gave me. My worries we’re not having enough mud pies for the cats, who never ate them, and finding my shoes so I could meet my friends to wade in the water we were forbidden to play in. I miss playing with friends, sharing juice and crackers and not wondering what they really thought of me. I miss a time when no one bothered to lie to me, because truth wasnt the enemy of the people, and it solved more problems than it caused.
I miss watching the news and wondering what the fuss was about. I miss the days when honor wasnt for suckers and truth wasnt an alternative. I miss going to sleep at night and waking up and the world hasnt slid further into the abbys. I miss the time when people gave their word and it meant something. I miss the days when people were separated by city or village limits not blue states or red states. I miss the days when we were the United States of America, and treated as one country.
I miss the days when feeding the poor wasnt charity and taxing the corporations was the fair thing to do. I miss the days when race wasnt front and center and the answer to all problems in the United States was to punish those different. I miss the days I wasnt weary of all police, and I only thought of them as community helpers, and I could trust them. I miss the days when I didn’t hesitate to call the police because I didnt know if they would help or make the situation worse.
I miss the days when we had a President who considered all people, his people, and made decisions and policies based on facts not whims or people who voted for him.
I miss the days loyalty was to an institution, not an undeserving man. I miss the days rules, laws, traditions, meant the same to everyone, and truth wasnt provisional.
I miss the days when the armed services was honorable, and the men and women to be respected, not considered suckers and losers. I miss the days when a man who didnt serve, would be ridiculed for insulting and belittling a man who did, because he didn’t support his warped views. I miss the days when sacrifice was something we all did, not just the poor and minorities.
I miss the days when right was right and wrong was wrong no matter who said or did it. I miss the days when a lie was called a lie, and truth tellers were not called fake. I miss the days when children murdered by a gun welding maniac was enough make changes to laws to prevent it happening again. I miss the days when money and power were not more important then human life, and political affiliations didnt influences life saving choices.
I miss honor, decency, respect, accountability, we once looked for in our President. I miss who we were, and grieve for who we will never be again.
0 notes
Text
About activism and effective action. There’s basically two types of Doing Something. Let’s call them Big and Little.
Big is: your sister asks if you can take care of her children if something happens to her, and you say yes. Big is, choosing your career, or choosing how to spend a massive chunk of your free time. Big is sitting down and looking through your finances and figuring out how much can go to good causes and figuring out which good causes you’re going to support. Big takes effort and thought and evaluating your core values and inventorying your skills/time/money — what you have to offer.
Little is: someone asks you to sign a petition. You’re buying groceries and the cashier asks if you’ll donate a dollar to a children’s hospital. Showing up for your sister’s kids’ birthday parties.
Little — relatively little — is signing up when a coworker is doing a union drive; Big is deciding to be the organizer.
A social media implication of this is: little is deciding to reblog a post. Big is deciding who you’re going to follow, or making a blanket decisions about what kinds of things you reblog or what kind of blog you want to have.
Little is there’s a post going around telling you to call your representative, and you do. (Which, tbf, is still really hard for a lot of us and worth celebrating. Maybe it’s not Little/Big so much as One Time vs Ongoing.) Big is signing up to get action alerts in your email or via an app, so you’ll keep doing it even of people on your feed stop talking about it.
One is a split second decision. The other takes deliberate thought.
And: a whole lot of organizing (or charity) is about getting people to take Little actions. Because if you’re asking people to do Little things, you’ll get a lot more people doing them than if you ask for Big things. And a lot of people doing Little things adds up.
I’m definitely not saying “only do Big actions, not Little ones.”
And some people only ever do Little things, when it comes to political or social justice issues — because of how their priorities shake out, because of limitations around free time or energy or resources or whatever.
I feel like I should end this on a strong conclusion, but I don’t really have one. Should it be, consider whether you should spend less time on Little stuff and more on Big stuff? Maybe. Should it be, spend some of your Big stuff energy budget on setting things up so that you get a lot of the Little calls to action that you think are the most constructive? Should it be, don’t feel bad if what you’re doing is Little stuff right now?
I don’t know.
Except this started with me thinking about this thing where I think sometimes people (including but not just me) reblog posts more based on the need to Feel Like I’m Doing Something than the actual helpfulness of actually hitting reblog? It is maybe a thing to watch out for. (Especially today, when the need to Do A Thing is strong, and if you’ve already done the Main Thing it’s not always clear where that Do A Thing energy should go.)
I do think, in my experience, that Little Things tend to feel more like doing something than Big Things, even if you’re actually doing way, way more with your Big Things.
0 notes
Text
Food, Inglorious Food
The fire and furore of free food - an opinion
This week I have seen a lot of posts about free school meals and why the government has refused to continue provision during the school holidays. What I haven’t seen is any ‘defence’ of this decision, or any kind of explanation as to why the motion was refused. I find this bizarre as usually there’s always decent coverage of reasons. The best I can find is that ‘it’s not the government role to provide food during school holidays’.
So I’m going to try and provide a general analysis of the furore.
What are free school meals?
Free school meals are provided to children whose parents/guardians claim a select number of benefits. All infants in reception, Year 1 and Year 2 are entitled to free school meals.
Why do free school meals exist?
Although most people might think it’s government altruism that provides free school meals to disadvantaged children, it would appear that there’s an enlightened self-interest at stake. School meals are provided so that children are not hungry at school, allowing them to concentrate better and not disrupt other pupils in the classroom. Free school meals have also been shown by studies to help lower obesity and increase academic achievement. Therefore if there were no free school meals, pupils would be disruptive, reducing the chance of other children to succeed - feed the poor kids so that the better-off ones can get on with it?
Possibly. However, feeding the child allows them to focus on their studies too, and if they do lower childhood obesity, this helps the child develop an understanding of healthy, nutritious food. We know that obesity leads to higher risk of heart disease, diabetes and, appropriately for the time, coronavirus complications. Does the cost of free school meals outweigh the later costs to the health service?
So what are the reasons against free school meals?
There are actually quite a few reasons. Firstly, is it government’s role to feed children? Parents/guardians already receive financial support for their children. There are also other benefits available to struggling parents/guardians. If these benefits aren’t enough to feed children on the fewer weeks they’re at home this poses two scenarios: the money is being spent correctly, or the money isn’t enough.
If we go with the former, that parents/guardians are spending on other things rather than food for their children: why then should government spend more money on them? It’s a good question. On the other hand, if benefits aren’t enough, the solution needs to be about providing more support for parents and guardians all year round, not just giving them little support for a few weeks in the year. Before we can debate the solution, we need to figure out what the actual problem is.
The other issue is that subsidising children is becoming an increasingly contentious issue in society with the increase of childless adults. Many, including this author, believe that having a child is, in the vast majority of scenarios, a choice, in the same way that having a pet is a choice. Why then should childless taxpayers pay to feed other people’s children - especially if those parents and guardians aren’t being responsible with the support they already receive? Why should people who choose to have a pet (receiving no financial support) pay for those who instead choose to have a child?
Again, there is an element of enlightened self-interest here. Taxpayers pay for children to go to school, receive medical treatment, etc., so that they will, as adults, help the taxpayer in their advanced age, as doctors and nurses, working as tradesmen and in utilities, and generally keeping society going. These adults will similarly pay for the next generation and so on. Meanwhile a pet, even an intelligent one, will likely not grow up to become a surgeon. Does that mean, however, that the choice is not a valid one?
A third argument is that central government doesn’t have to do this when there are other parties that can step in. We’ve seen this recently, with businesses, charities and local authorities offering to provide free school meals. This seems to vindicate the government’s decision - they don’t have to do anything and the problem is still solved. Society blinked first. There are lots of fields where government doesn’t get involved and the gap is filled by others. It’s an ideology that sets limits on government intervention. It should come as little surprised that the party of privatisation doesn’t want to get involved.
The politics
Labour has cashed in politically on the notion that a million children will go hungry over the holidays. I mean, if this is true, it’s is a systemic failing in society where parents and guardians are not feeding their children. In fact, it simply means that a million children are eligible for free school meals. Three of these year groups are automatically entitled regardless of income, so that lowers the real number of disadvantaged children somewhat. Indeed, I would happily stake my reputation (what’s left of it) that most of these children won’t go hungry, and that they will be fed appropriately by loving, caring parents and guardians.
And those that don’t? That’s where other agencies need to be involved to ensure that the child’s welfare is taken care of. This, perhaps, is the government’s view: most children will be fed, and those that don’t are already receiving support for children and not using it appropriately (returning to the point above). There are already laws and frameworks to be used against parents and guardians neglecting their children - such as not feeding them.
What is strange, however, from a political viewpoint, is why the government would choose to vote against this. Even if you make the ideological point that it’s not the role of government to pay for children’s food during the holidays, it’s a political winner. When you’re spending £12billion on a shoddy test and trace system, and countless more billions on furlough and job support schemes during various lockdowns (a socialist utopia hardly in keeping with Conservative ideology in itself!), the amount of money spent to support children during the holidays is relatively minimal by comparison, especially when you consider that this money is also buying political capital for the next election: “The Conservatives kept your children fed” is a much better sounding lie than “The Conservatives starved your children”.
What is the solution?
This author doesn’t feel that free school meals should be continued through the holidays - simply because it doesn’t solve the problem it claims to. Let’s consider:
If the benefits of school meals are correct, that they help lower obesity, increase academic achievement and help children concentrate at school, I believe that every child should have free school meals and nutritious food vouchers all year round, regardless of their parents’/guardians’ income.
If parents and guardians are not receiving enough support for their families, the welfare system should be revolutionised so that they are.
If parents and guardians are not spending their current child support appropriately, this should be replaced with non-financial vouchers (like the free school meals during the summer holidays) to ensure that children are fed and parents and guardians cannot use it on themselves.
However, I believe in abolishing the welfare state and replacing it with a universal basic income. Give every adult a set amount each month independent of the income they receive from work. No strings attached; no signing on; spend it on what you want. I can get a dog, you can have a child - but it’s the only money you’ll get from government. A guaranteed income that isn’t affected by how much or how little someone may work from one week to the next ensures the essentials are covered whilst still encouraging (in fact, requiring) income from work. With the current welfare budget you could pay every adult £400 a month and still have plenty left over.
Frankly, I believe that the free school meals furore has been a cheap political manoeuvre by Labour, when what is really required is a whole new way of thinking about welfare. I’m more than happy for my taxes to be spent on ensuring that all children are nutritiously fed at school and at home all year round. Yet society also needs to enforce responsibilities: if you decide to have a child, it’s your responsibility to take care of them. It’s nobody else’s. And as much as society has a general interest in the welfare of your child so that they grow up to be a useful, independent and law-abiding citizen, the responsibility is on the parent and guardian first and foremost.
I would love to be part of a society where the greater good was the priority, but we don’t. Our society is about individualism - about individual rights, individual freedoms, individual opportunity. Fair enough. But with those rights come responsibilities. And too often this means that we focus on the wrong things. Instead of padding the seats in the lifeboats, we should be ensuring that the hull is watertight.
We’ve been dragged into yet another left-right political storm that has fundamentally missed the point again. Until we come together to find what the real problems are and devise real solutions that will actually fix the issues, we’ll just keep shouting at each other whilst the iceberg approaches.
0 notes
Text
ISLAM 101: Muslim Culture and Character: Morals And Manners: Part 2
BUILDING GOOD CHARACTER
The topic of this book, “adab in practice,” is part of the larger concept of akhlaq, that is, morality. In fact, from one perspective, adab in practice is fundamentally practical morality and ethics. Therefore, the essence of these concepts will be explained first, beginning with a short introduction to akhlaq, and only after this will adab in practice be returned to.
Akhlaq, the plural of khuluq in Arabic, means the character and temperament of a person. The temperament of a person brings either good or harmful things. In the broadest aspect morality means that there is a moral character, that is, morality becomes deeply ingrained in the soul and as a consequence right actions and behavior come naturally and easily from within; then, the person with such a character no longer has to struggle intellectually to know what ethical choices to make.
Human characteristics can generally be divided into those that society approves of and those that we disapprove of. Decency, humility, and kindness are traits that are seen in a positive light, while arrogance, deceit, and miserliness are generally perceived as negative human characteristics. To recognize these characteristics and their attendant traits is to understand what is meant here by the phrase “moral character.” Nawwas ibn Saman once asked the Prophet how to recognize the difference between goodness and sin. The Prophet answered, “Goodness is a good moral character. Sin is anything that pricks one’s conscience, and which one does not want others to know about. Another narration from Jabir reports that the Messenger said, “The most beloved to me among you and the ones who will be closest to me on the Day of Judgment are the best in moral character. And they who are most loathsome to me and will be farthest from me on the Day of Judgment are those who gossip, those with unbridled tongues, and those who condescend.” When they asked him, “O Messenger of God! Who are those who condescend?” he replied, “They are those who are arrogant.”
Ethics, which is the study or science of morals, can be divided into the theoretical and the practical. While theoretical morality is concerned with those concepts that constitute the principles and rules of morality, practical morality is concerned with the duties that constitute the basis of moral life. As reported by the Prophet, “God looks not at your outward appearances, nor at your wealth or belongings. God looks only at your hearts and your deeds.” For this reason, here we will be mainly concerned with the practical side of morality, and as mentioned above, the purpose of this book is to explore adab in practice. At this point, with a view to clarifying the meaning of human responsibility, let us take a closer look at the concept of duty, which is pivotal to developing a good character with adab.
THE NATURE AND TYPES OF DUTY
Duty is the moral responsibility of a person who has reached pu- berty when they have been asked to do something good or help- ful. Accordingly, Islamically there are two types of duty. One is the obligatory (fard) group of duties, that is, those the perfor- mance of which is binding and the abandonment of which is for- bidden. For example, performing daily prayers, fasting during the holy month of Ramadan, and offer prescribed purifying alms fall into this category. The other type of duty is that which, al- though not obligatory, is encouraged or desirable; it is these du- ties that religion presents as being inherent parts of a good moral character. To observe these duties on top of the obligatory ones shows greater spiritual maturity and is worthy of Divine reward; the observation of them pleases God. To neglect such duties would be a shortcoming. An example of this type of duty would be the giving of money or goods to those in need (sadaqa), over and above the prescribed purifying alms (zakat), and generally being kind and polite to everyone.
Duties can further be classified as those fulfilled in the cause of God, or for the benefit of the individual, family, or even society. From this perspective, duties can be divided into different sorts—divine, familial, and social duties. Let us more closely examine these categories.
Divinely-Ordained Duties
It is incumbent upon every person who has come of age and who is in possession of all their mental faculties that they recognize and worship God. For a human, there can be no greater blessing or honor than this servitude to God. One worships God by willingly and gratefully performing acts of worship, such as daily prayers, fasting, charity, and such other commitments that require both physical and financial abilities, like the pilgrimage to Mecca. In addition to these duties that pertain to the personal practice of Islam, safeguarding and defending one’s homeland is also a sacred duty.
Another very important divine duty is to struggle against one’s own evil-commanding soul. Those who cannot discipline their ego or self through moral education will not be able to help themselves, let alone society. Believers, both as individuals and members of society, need to exert themselves to strive in the way of God in all their actions at all moments of life. This is what Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him, meant when he said, “We are returning from the lesser jihad (struggle) to the greater,” while he was
returning to Medina from the Campaign of Tabuk. Emphasizing that they were returning from “the lesser struggle to the greater,” the Prophet directed his Community to this “greater struggle” that is waged against one’s carnal self at all moments of life.
Being this comprehensive in nature, jihad includes every action, from the simplest act of speaking to remaining silent or performing supererogatory acts of worship, such as extra prayers, worship and fasting to attain the good pleasure of God. Likewise, to enlighten our hearts we can read the Qur’an, or to increase the light of our faith we can continually remember and reflect on the Divine Attributes of our Almighty Creator that are manifest all around us.
Individual Duties
Each person has some duties toward their own self as well. Some of these pertain to the body and some to the spirit. The following are the main duties that fall into this category:
Training the body: For everyone, it is crucial that the body is kept strong and clean. Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings are upon him, said, “A strong and vigorous believer is better than a frail and weak one.”5
Caring for one’s health: Health is a great blessing; therefore, it is vital to avoid things that may damage one’s health and to seek treatment when one is ill.
Refraining from dangerous practices of abstinence or self- denial practiced in the name of spiritual discipline.
Guarding against things that wear down and age the body.
Strengthening
willpower: A person needs to develop
healthy self-control. This involves learning what is good for the body and partaking of it, as well as finding out what is harmful and avoiding it.
Duties relating to the mind and intellect, such as pursuing learning and enlightenment, awakening higher emotions and positive feelings in the heart, and honing one’s talents and skills.
Family Duties
The family is the very foundation of a healthy society. Each member of the family must accept some responsibility for the others in the family. Some of the primary duties of a husband, for instance, are to behave kindly toward his wife, to meet her basic needs, and to be loyal to her. A narration of the Prophet says, “The best of you is he who is the best to his wife.” A wife who is happy with her spouse will support her husband’s decisions, as long as they do not conflict with religious directives and contribute to protecting the family honor and property. All these are pivotal to happiness in marital relations and to a happy family.
Parents in such an atmosphere commit themselves to nurture, educating and training their children to the best of their ability, setting them on the path to success in life. Fathers and mothers should treat their children equally, holding them in equal regard and affection. They should be gentle towards their offspring and raise them in such a way that they will not be inclined to rebel. Parents also have the duty to be models of virtue for their children.
Respect and obedience are, in turn, some of the basic duties of children towards parents who have brought them up according to the principles set out above and with love and compassion, feeding and caring for them. This is why children should not show displeasure or impatience with their parents. A son or daughter who ignores the wishes of their parents and does not heed them nor come to their assistance if they are in need is not a source of blessing for the parents. Such a person not only is not a useful member of society but will also stand before God as one who is guilty of shirking their duty.
Likewise, siblings have duties toward one another, such as showing affection and compassion for each other, as well as helping and respecting each other. There is a very strong bond between brothers and sisters and this should be maintained at all times. Brothers and sisters who cut their ties with one another over finances or property disagreements cannot be considered to be blessed or benevolent. Finally, if a household has hired help, this helper also must be treated as part of the family. They deserve kindness and gentle treatment and should never be overloaded with work that is too difficult for them to carry out.
Social Duties
Human beings have been created as social beings, and as such, they live in social groups and have formed civilizations. Socializing is one of our basic needs, and social life involves certain expectations between people. When these are disregarded, society breaks down and people can no longer coexist peacefully or work together. The main responsibilities in this category are the preservation of the following inalienable rights:
Protecting the life of every individual: Every person has the right to life. No one has the right to take another person’s life. According to Islam, one who wrongfully kills a person is as guilty as if they have murdered all of humanity; likewise, one who saves one person’s life is as blessed as if they have saved all of humanity.
Safeguarding the freedom of all people: God Almighty created every human being free and equal. At the same time, it is certain that this freedom has boundaries. We do not have the prerogative to do anything we want; if we had such freedom this would violate the freedoms of others.
The consideration of conscience: When a person has a well- functioning conscience, this allows them to differentiate between good and bad. The value of such a conscience can be better understood if one observes outward consequences. A person who engages in incorrect behavior cannot be said to have a functioning conscience. Islam assigns great importance to have a conscience that helps one to be concerned for the happiness and guidance of all humanity.
To this end, it encourages pity towards those who have a faulty conscience and tries to bring them in the right way. One can never try to control or rule another person’s conscience; this is the province of God alone. Each person will be rewarded or punished for what is in their conscience. However, this does not mean it is wrong to admonish or advise a person who has a bad conscience if the idea is to help the person.
Protecting freedom of mind: Any thought or opinion, right or wrong, must be approached in a scholarly manner. This is the only way for a truth to be discovered, and it is also the only way for society to prove the harmfulness of false ideas.
Protecting the honor and reputation of individuals: In Islam, everyone has the right to maintain their honor and dignity. Any attack against honor or dignity, we have been taught, will be gravely punished. It is, for this reason, that gossip, slander, ridicule, the cursing of others and saying negative things about others are absolutely forbidden in Islam.
The preservation of other people’s property: It is also forbidden to usurp the property or possessions of any other person. What is earned by a person belongs strictly to that person? This is essential for the development of a civilized society. It is reasonable and necessary that the individuals who make up society will have different degrees of wealth, according to their profession and training. In a fair and equitable society, all should be grateful for and satisfied with their own portion.
#allah#god#islam#muslim#revert#reverthelp#reverthelp team#convert#new revert#new convert#new muslim#muslim revert#muslim convert#welcome to islam#revert to islam#convert to islam#how to convert islam#prophet#muhammad#quran#sunnah#hadith#dua#prayer#pray#salah#help#reliigon#muslimah
6 notes
·
View notes
Text
Evgeny Primakov: “The future of Venezuela is decided on the streets of Caracas”
Whether Maduro recognized by the President of Venezuela will stand, whether it will not stand is a question that will not be decided in our Kremlin, or even in Washington, in fact, but in the streets of Caracas. Yes, we see the intervention of the United States and other external players in the results of the presidential election, not some kind of invented “cyber intervention”, but the real, direct, “meat”, down to earth. Are we worried about the situation in Venezuela, given that Russia credited Maduro, that Rosneft is producing there and investing in the country’s oil sector. Of course, as a contributor, we are concerned about what is going on in this not very stable bank. However, China is even more concerned: we were not the main pillar of President Maduro.
Are there any fault of the Venezuelan government and President Maduro in the mass impoverishment, rabid inflation, hopelessness that covered the country, or can all the problems be “hung” on external pressure, sanctions and so on: of course, this fault exists and it determines all current events; Of course, we cannot assume that the Washington obkom is to blame for everything – the Venezuelan government is economically inept and ruining its country, hungry people who take to the streets have the right to protest. But as far as possible it is necessary to abide by the law. It is necessary to prevent military intervention, it is necessary to prevent bloodshed and lawlessness.
But I would like to speculate not about who is to blame and what’s next: it will all be chewed many times or clarified in the coming hours and days. And not even about what we need to do: I think it’s just that in no case can we “crowded, equestrian and armed” get into the Venezuelan crisis, on the curves of the Favell streets of Caracas.
Important lessons. What exactly Russia and Russian companies have done not to gain access to Venezuelan oil and arms supply contracts, but to insure their risks. Not the support of the opposition, which destroys the trust of a profitable partner, not an attempt to manipulate the elites, because it makes you a hostage of the internal political context – which was done by Russian organizations, companies, representatives so that the people of Venezuela are the same favella, the same military, teachers, doctors , engineers, peasants – identified with us, experienced human sympathy and gratitude for us. Sorry for the low genre of “rhetorical questioning” – but where exactly are Russian schools and vaccination points, wells and filter stations, generators that give light to rural hospitals, where Venezuelan non-governmental organizations that receive environmental protection projects support, as many places in Russian universities on quotas received by students from the country? I will answer: they are not present or are disappearing a little. I will be given examples of exhibitions and concerts, tours of orchestras, ensembles, artists, and so on. They are needed, of course. But whether such projects solve the earthly tasks of mass solidarization and lobbying – no, they do not.
Again and again, with the persistence of an idiot greedy to feed, we were engaged in buying up elites, not paying attention to the fact that they could disappear / change / change orientation, our companies bought basketball clubs, rode on private jets, organized parties and rode generals on yachts and their children, took on work / feed relatives of ministers in the staff of missions and joint projects, our companies traditionally, with a truly classic capitalist cynicism and disregard, referred to the “masses” in favor of the “elites”. Whatever elites may be, they can secure contracts, and in this sense even buying off elites may be useful, but concentrating on such policies cannot reduce the critical risks in the event of major shocks. Such risks can reduce the positive reputation that is formed in the mass media on the street. This is not “subversive work” or “support for the opposition” – by no means, since there is no such goal, this is insurance.
Simple as mooing example: when you build a wooden cottage, you buy a fire extinguisher there. You can donate something valuable to the local district or municipal head, this can be useful. But it is the fire extinguisher that will save you from the fire.
I remember well a conversation with a high representative of a very large Russian company that conducts a very big business in Venezuela: “Dear friend,” I said, “let’s launch inexpensive and effective projects in the country, medical care, the fight against illiteracy and disease. For you it is not a charity, but an investment, an investment. It will pay off by the fact that you will have constant support “on the ground”, regardless of who will sit in the government, what he will say and whom to be guided. ” “Why,” the high representative replied to me (he answered a little more rudely, but I am not offended, he is a good person, actually), “we bought a basketball club there, we are flying there soon, you know what cocktails we are making on the plane.
I will only emphasize that such humanitarian work, it is sometimes called “promoting international development” (IDA), is not at all a charity. No need to compare this with what the Soviet Union was doing at the time, which took off its last shirt; such humanitarian “earthly” projects in any way and do not “take away” from poor Russian regions – villages and cities – because they pay off, this is an investment, an investment. How it is built in our country at the state level, and not at the corporate level: this is done by the Ministry of Finance, not Rossotrudnichestvo (although it should be according to the “CMP Concept”) – and about a billion dollars are spent per year. Billion! Well, let’s leave out the amount of this amount in the conditions of unresolved difficult domestic problems, since we agree to consider this not as an irrevocable charity, but as an investment in the loyalty and consolidation of our interests (including the interests of companies). But even so it does not work: almost all of these funds are spent on financing UN agencies, international organizations and projects, and not bilateral projects — Russia-Venezuela — such a minority. This suits the Ministry of Finance, as it is easier to report and do not have to worry about efficiency calculations, it warms bureaucratic ambition from meetings at the governing boards in New York and Geneva. But this does not correspond to our state interests, is inefficient economically and is the most stupid and senseless waste of money that can be imagined in the field of humanitarian cooperation.
I would add: and didn’t we profukali Ukraine, and there, too, putting on the feeding of fat cats loaves and gas discounts, which never reached ordinary Ukrainians? And is it necessary to list many other countries that are much closer to us than Venezuela? Venezuela is just now entering the door, through which many have already passed.
To summarize. It is a pity that Russia as a state and Russian companies, using the example of Venezuela, once again showed that they are not able to effectively secure their interests, to secure them through the tools of humanitarian cooperation and so-called “soft power”. Even military aid, weapons, aircraft landing or military bases cannot provide Russia with mass support from the population of the countries in which we are interested. But we are still doing critically little or practically nothing so that the population of the same Venezuela, even after a change in the political “elite”, would like to say to the “elite” of the new one. But you cannot touch Russia, it must remain. The fact that Russia needs to be moved from other sectors of the economy that are profitable to us, from the same Washington, will not sound compelling objections from society: Venezuelans on the streets (on both sides of the barricades, by the way) do not give a damn what cocktails you made to yourself on the plane and how many suitcases money donated to people in good suits.
http://interkomitet.com/about-the-committee/blogs/evgeny-primakov/evgeny-primakov-the-future-of-venezuela-is-decided-on-the-streets-of-caracas/
0 notes
Last Seen Blogs
hotel-a-h-s
normal people scare me
buns-ttte-fixation
I'm Vult. Not Buns. Trying to fix that bare with me
castielafflicted
Castiel afflicted. Castiel, afflicted.
varietas
V A R I E T A S . . .
moonstonediaz
we’re everywhere, man