Ok, so, my magazine arrived today. It's a lot smaller than I thought it would be, though I actually should have expected it, but it's only 21 centimeters tall.
There are pages on a few of the Milan squad, but it's all pretty interesting. I got it originally for this page:
If you read the questions, some of his answers are pretty funny. Apparently, he prefers showers, doesn't know how to do house chores, his favorite sport is Tennis (?), and his favorite song is "Kiss" by Prince. Also, those shorts...
Anyways, there are more pages on Billy, Gullit, Van Basten, Rijkard, Tassoti, Marco Simone, and some more. There is a little section for fan arts made by kids:
Fanart of Evani, Gullit, Maldini and Donadoni. The children captured Paolo's Soul glaring eyes well. Anyway, if you want to see specific pages like Gullits page or Van bastens just lmk
24 notes
·
View notes
Guys pls when I talk about characters, just assume I'm talking about the original text (or I guess English translation of the original text)
If I'm talking about a retelling/adaption I'll mention it lmao. I do it with epic and I do it with movies/shows I watch. Why is my inbox suddenly full of /neg anons about feminist retellings 😭
233 notes
·
View notes
TW for racism and genocide of Native Americans
Today I learned that the original "The only good _, is a dead _," was "The only good Indian, is a dead Indian." And it really sucks that now I know this information.
Looks like it's speculated to be attributed to one specific Union general due to his actions, but it was more likely just a common anti-Native sentiment of the time held by a lot of the settlers, not just one person.
Like I know I hear 'the only good snake, is a dead snake' most often since I love being in snake discussion groups, which also sucks because I love snakes, and they shouldn't be killed.
But I've also heard like 'the only good Nazi, is a dead Nazi.' And like, I So agree with that, fuck Nazis, but I don't want to think about the original phrase being reclaimed like that for a laugh, no matter how much I agree that Nazis suck.
It should stay as horrifying and sickening as 'the only good Indian, is a dead Indian' in my opinion. I think we should retire the phrase entirely and just note that, that was the origin of it - the continued genocide of Native Americans during the 1800s when settlers were eager to get rid of us so they could claim property for themselves while forcing us into insufficient reservations as US America expanded westward.
This book I'm reading describes that the usual retaliation for the theft of a cow would have been the execution of an entire Indian village. One specific horrifying example given, is from accounts of a traveler that joined a group of Mexicans pursuing Indians (Chumash) in possession of stolen horses. They come across a group of some old Indians, women and children, drying the horse meat. Every last one was killed, and their ears cut off as proof for the priests that they made every effort to retrieve the horses.
This shit is so sickening. They were hungry and trying to survive.
It also describes how the accounts of Indians from my tribe before the mission system were all about how generous and welcoming they were. (Though, it was through the lens of the Spanish who saw us as ideal candidates for conversion because of this.) Then after the collapse of the missions and post-assimilation, the accounts simply describe the Indians' drunkenness and disorder. What did you expect???? You assimilate a group of people so they're entirely reliant on you (the rigid structure of the mission system and the dismantling of their previous tribal villages), and then suddenly turn them out to a world without their previous villages and social order. Of course they're going to struggle and suffer and abuse the drugs (alcohol) you introduced them to.
I hate this so much.
The book also mentions how, during the mission period, anyone who ran away from the missions to go back to their original tribal lives, would be dragged back to the missions and cruelly punished with restraints, lashing, or stocks, and they couldn't understand why because punishment was exceedingly rare before Spanish rule.
Ugh. Anyway.
I'm going to bring this up any time I hear anyone mention that phrase, because the horror of that time period should not be diminished in its modern reclamation. ('Diminished,' because I, a 30yo Native American, did not even know the origin. I thought it was a modern phrase. Our local Native history was always glossed over in school to focus on the mission system. I didn't even learn of my tribe's revolt until like 2016 when I went to a lecture my tribe held.)
I get that reclamation is supposed to be like a good thing, to take away the power of its original use, but I personally don't think that's appropriate for this phrase that was used as a rally for genocide.
Maybe I'm just being a sensitive baby, though, who knows! I'm crying while reading a history book about my tribe. This shit really hurts deep, though. It always has.
4 notes
·
View notes
hello i have no idea how to say this without feeling like im coming off incredibly conceited (so im on anon for now) but. a while ago i wrote a fic that i think you would maybe probably enjoy? its a psychological torture-y body horror-y semi-character-study longfic thats essentially just jay getting physically and emotionally more fucked up in kind of a villain arc way but not really a Villain? lots of violence etc and some of your jay whump drawings were kind of a big insp while i was writing it ahaha!! so i thought maybe youd be interested - that said tho feel free to ignore this ask!!!! i realise promoing myself in your inbox is a bit cheeky i just genuinely thought the themes were up your alley so if you are interested lmk i can link you but no worries if not B) also love your work!! the way you write (and draw) whump is incredibly tasty it scrambles my brain ok bye
hmhmm i would say i am interested in such elements. but i have to be upfront and honest here. i am VERY VERY critical about fanfiction. i love fanfiction but bc i love fanfiction i am also very. picky. i developed a refined taste over the years. not that im saying that i assume your fic isnt good, its just that. are you okay with running the risk of me not liking it by sharing it with me? are you open to (honest but fair) criticism? i dont want you to have expectations for my reaction. and also i dont want to give unwarranted criticism either, i dont want to be mean or hurtful. i just. cant lie about fic. so if i dont have high praise for a fic i keep it mostly to myself. well i do vague a lot about fanfic on twitter. but i try to keep it nonidentifying if it isnt positive.
anyways thats not the point. if i havent inadvertently scared you off and you are emotionally prepared for any reaction (or even no reaction), you may send it to me. i can only promise that i will judge it fairly. if you okay with constructive criticism i can give it too. but i get it if you dont want that. if you just want me to read it just for the sake of reading it i can do that too
8 notes
·
View notes