#blind gossip: ? | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

taylorvaughnsaidso · 8 months

Text

okay so, guess whoever wants to watch when it comes out if she's wearing the same outfit as that footage right after the first divorce announcement was made theeeen lol wow he's even more shitty. 👀

#joe jonas #sophie turner #blind item #blinds #pop culture #gossip #enty lawyer #crazy days and nights

56 notes · View notes

brf-rumortrackinganon · 3 months

Note

Do you have any idea who’s the source of Crazy Day and Nights when it comes to royal gossip? Didn’t they admit on a podcast with deuxmoi that they don’t have a royal source, yet continues to post royal related blind items. Isn’t that a bit weird? They basically admitted they don’t have a credible source. Also, do you think their blinds about Harry and Megham are reliable?

Meghan and the Yorkies.

CDAN rarely got royal blinds before 2016/2017. They got them every once in a while, but no one ever paid much attention and they never got a whole lot of traction. It was readily accepted that those came from the Yorks, especially if they targeted the Cambridges or Harry. Blinds that targeted the Yorks were said to come from Epstein connections as warnings to Andrew. (Which on the one hand I'm skeptical of because the BRF has never reacted to blind gossip but on the other hand, this was a time when Andrew was absolutely gunning for his daughters to have/keep official duties so anything that risked making the girls look bad, he would've been all over to fix.)

Then Meghan came onto the scene in 2016 and CDAN started getting a ton of blinds about the royal family, especially about William and Kate. Those were all from her, and I think she was still leaking to CDAN about William and Kate up until 2021. Any of the blinds that attacked Meghan through 2019ish were from the Yorks, but I think they got out of it after Newsnight (which, speaking of Newsnight for a second, did you know they're making a movie out of that whole mess? Michael Sheen is playing Andrew).

I'm not totally sure who is leaking to CDAN now, especially about Meghan. Sometimes I think Meghan leaks shit about herself just to keep people talking about her. There are probably some people in Hollywood that she's pissed off who might be empowered to leak or that CDAN has industry connections, including contacts at WME, that they're hearing things from. But there is also the very real possibility that CDAN is making it up complete - they have admitted to doing that to other celebs.

The Yorkies seem like they've gotten out of that kind of stuff, but it's entirely possible Eugenie might still have connection and she's the one providing info on William and Kate, but even those have largely stopped too so I think she's cut off from the Waleses (or is at least on an information diet).

As for Deuxmoi, I think it's Abigail Spencer leaking on Meghan's behalf when the scoop was something positive. Or at least she was a few years ago, and now it's some poor intern at WME.

I don't think the blinds about Harry and Meghan are reliable. I haven't followed CDAN since before COVID but I'll look at the website after major Hollywood events like the Grammys and the Oscars to read about the after-parties - it seems like most of the blinds these days about the Sussexes are things that everyone can reasonably predict Meghan will do because she's a creature of habit: we know she's going to try and make it seem like she's "in" with Hollywood for the big events and the big parties.

#ask #brf #sussexes #blind gossip

32 notes · View notes

rainymoodlet · 1 year

Text

getting married in four days is one thing - but going on successful blind dates? now that’s been impossible 🌵 dallas invited their best friend, anaya jang, out to lunch to gossip and ask for some advice on their situation!

107 notes · View notes

stealyourblorbos · 10 days

Text

Every once in a while I'm reminded why I'm not that active in Tumblr fandom anymore and mentally thank the abyss. *touches bloodied ground*

#fucking gross #gossip blogs fully built on encouraging anon blinds judge other blogs for stalkery behavior #pot fucking kettle #get a life please #and help #and maybe laid

9 notes · View notes

maggots-inmyguts · 8 days

Text

Drawing I'm not gonna finish (⁠⸝⁠⸝⁠⸝⁠´ꈊ`⁠⸝⁠⸝⁠⸝⁠)

Golf and Lude sippin from the heads of degenerates (themselves)

Goth-@/(＾◡＾)っ✂╰⋃╯no

Lotus-@/ᝯׁ֒υׁׅtׁׅυׁׅrժׁׅ݊ꪱׁׁׁׅׅׅᝯׁ֒ƙׁׅᨵׁׅׅܻ⨍ܻ⨍ɑׁׅ݊ꪀժׁׅ݊kׁׅ֑ꪱׁׅᥣׁׅ֪ᥣׁᨮׁׅ֮ᨵׁׅυׁׅr꯱ꫀᥣ⨍

#goth afterlife #lotus death #sketch #i love silly people #they chill together on the rare #not much to relate to other than just gossip and spill tea ;)#also please someone notice that Goth has both eyes but they're dim because hes sumwhat blind please amd thank you😋

9 notes · View notes

daisiesonafield-blog · 2 years

Text

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD PLEASE RUN AS FAR AWAY FROM DWD AND THAT POS ASSHOLE OF A DIRECTOR AND END THIS DISASTROUS STUNT.

TRULY WAAAAAAAAAY PAST ITS EXPIRY

#@ hshq yall are idiots #i cannot believe u got H involved in this crap #IDIOTS #IDIOT MOVE #WTF #holivia #cdan #blind gossip #holivia august 2022 #holivia receipts #dwd promo #aug 31 2022 #aug 2022 #enty

195 notes · View notes

im-still-watching-anime · 2 years

Text

suigetsu: you like naruto?? really?

sasuke: i know.

suigetsu: i’m really surprised isn’t he kind of ugly?

sasuke: he’s ugly but in a hot way

suigetsu: i don’t think that’s a thing

sasuke: he’s special that way

#naruto #naruto shippuden #naruto incorrect quotes #sasunaru #sns #uchiha sasuke #suigetsu hozuki #uzumaki naruto #cannot begin to tell you how much i want more content of them gossiping #wasn’t the biggest fan of team taka/hebi etc but i did love this dynamic So Much #suigetsu just got me he’s so annoying i HAD to love him #no other choice #also naruto isn’t ugly naruto characters are just blind #sasukes lying through his teeth

172 notes · View notes

bcofl0ve · 1 year

Text

i needed this laugh today 😭

#the baz photo is a bit old is this what prompted that #one crazy days and nights blind 😭#kidding kidding #jdhejdhj #gossip time with mollie #austin butler #baz luhrmann

43 notes · View notes

whatiwillsay · 6 months

Note

How can we trust you? I mean really, you say you verify sources but you don't give us the sources. What makes you different than ttb/tsemojianon/spaderiddles/others? (Genuinely asking)

i've shared insider info on here before it was made public, then it was later made public. a list of some of that info is in the post linked above but the list includes: knowing that olivia was releasing new music and when, knowing that there would be an international eras tour and that sabrina carpenter would be an opener, two different instances of knowing explicit details of taylor's mvs before they were out, and what night taylor was announcing speak now.

that doesn't mean every single thing i predict or share is correct because gossip can get lost in the grapevine but i do an excellent job of vetting my sources and it's proven with all that stuff up there i got right. also ttb and spade riddles are the same person. and she's never shared info before it was made public. she has people send her poems or riddles or fanfic and then after public info her readers back track into saying oh they knew xyz was happening but they never know anything is going to happen before it happens nor when. they back into acting like they have insiders after the fact.

idk who tsemojianon is so not referring to them in this post.

#gaylor #kaylor #gaylor swift #swiftgron #gossip #blind items #pop culture

7 notes · View notes

taylorvaughnsaidso · 7 months

Text

🤔 the worst chris thing still cracks me up

#chris evans #chris pine #chris pratt #chris hemsworth #blind items #blind #deuxmoi #pop culture #gossip

25 notes · View notes

brf-rumortrackinganon · 4 months

Note

Please share your reasoning when you get a chance on why you don't believe Theresa Longo Fans. Granted, they have been wrong before.

So the TL;DR of it is:

They're anonymous journalists and that's suspicious.

They haven't updated their brag sheet in 6 years, which means they haven't had a good source in 6 years.

They plagiarize almost everything.

They use vague language and broad generalities in their scoops that lets them take credit no matter what happens.

Keep reading for the longer explanations.

1. I'm always immediately suspicious of anyone in journalism that doesn't use their name. When a journalist is anonymous, especially when they have no need to be like in TLF's case, it's not easy to hold them accountable to lies and mistakes. The two guys behind TLF like to brag about their journalism credentials, and that's huge because there's no way to follow up to make sure they are who they say they are. They rely on "just trust me" authority, and when has that ever worked out? Especially with blind gossip sites (in addition to TLF, this includes CDAN, Blind Gossip, DeuxMoi, and Exposing SMG), you can't verify the accuracy of what they post - especially when you consider that CDAN, Enty, and DeuxMoi all admitted they make stuff up.

(And also ExposingSMG rarely has new information when it comes to the BRF. (They might have sources for other celebs, but I don't pay attention close enough.) Specifically, they just repeat what was being discussed on the blogs and reddit, calling them "my source" so they don't have to cite. BTW, ExposingSMG has since rebranded as Scandalous.Media. They posted about the Sussexes recently and some of their quoted sources or "revelations" are things that have been around for awhile. This one in particular I think is a combination of info from CDAN and SMM.)

I saw somewhere once that the TLF guys don't share their names so they can protect the privacy and confidentiality of their sources. But I call BS. If journalists needed anonymity to protect their sources, then why aren't more journalists reporting anonymously? These two guys are the only people I know that calls themselves journalists who do this, and to me that is suspicious. (Exceptions only for reporters in war zones.)

2. Look at the scoops they take credit for in their pinned tweet: Sussex baby #1, Khloe Kardashian's pregnancy, Kylie Jenner's baby, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie's divorce, Megxit, Wendy Williams's show demise, and the Pulse/Orlando nightclub shooting. What these all have in common is that they are events from 2016 - 2019. Meaning they had really good sources, contacts, and access 6-8 years ago. And that list not having anything more recent suggests they don't have the kind of sources, contacts, and access anymore. If they did, and if they were still getting the same sort of accurate scoops that they were 7 years ago, this list would be updated to inclde those more recent events. Why haven't they?

Now, that's not to say they never had good sources. They did have good sources, and whoever it was, their information was solid enough that it upset Meghan enough to get Bouzy to take TLF down. That doesn't really mean anything because a broken clock is still correct twice a day.

3. The tweets themselves are problematic. In fact, most of them are plagiarized.

If there's a direct quote in the tweet, it's plagiarized from some other source/news media and TLF never cites the source. For example, this TLF tweet from January 8th:

It implies that they've interviewed Dominic himself. But they never spoke to Dominic. The quotes come, verbatim, from this January 6th article published by The Mirror.

And for tweets without a direct quote in it, they usually try to pass it off as their own scoop but nine times out of ten, it isn't. For example, this tweet:

It looks like a good scoop. At face value, it is: they know someone who saw Shia at church and connected one plus one.

But #1, when you search "Actor Shia LaBeouf appears to have converted to Catholicism after being seen at a New Year's Eve Mass presided over by Capuchin Franciscan friars," this article from the Associated Press on December 31st comes up:

Almost everything they publish is like this. Go ahead - choose any tweet, copy the text into a search engine, and see what happens.

And #2, look at their verbiage. Specifically, the phrase appears to have in the Shia tweet above. This is how they get away with passing off their stories as scoops, with vague verbage that could go either way. That way, when an article is later published about it, they can grab the "original" tweet and claim credit with "as we told our followers back in..." or "no surprise to our followers..." tweets.

*******************************

Now, specific to royal-watching: they completely and totally missed the ball on big stuff (like Platinum Jubilee and Coronation appearances), but they got it on the smaller stuff (Spare and Frogmore). But the kicker is that the smaller stuff is things that were either written about by royal reporters or was plausible gossip floating around the royal fandom.

The things they were wildly wrong on - for instance, the children being on the balcony at the Platinum Jubilee and the royals hosting a birthday party for Archie after the coronation - were things that came directly from Meghan's PR. So either they didn't realize it was Meghan's PR or they decided to hedge their bets and post it anyway on the off-chance it happened, which I think is in poor taste but it makes for very fun entertainment.

#ask #tlf #blind gossip

25 notes · View notes

srtrustno1 · 11 months

Text