#Top Psychics In-The-UK
Text
Top Psychics In The UK
The Creme de la Creme of Psychic Talent: Top Psychics in the UK
The realm of psychic phenomena has intrigued humanity for centuries, with individuals claiming to possess unique intuitive abilities to perceive information beyond the ordinary senses. In the United Kingdom, a land steeped in mysticism and folklore, there are several remarkable psychics whose reputations transcend borders. Let's delve into the captivating world of these top psychics, celebrated for their remarkable insights and uncanny abilities.
Top psychics in the uk
Sally Morgan: With a career spanning over four decades, Sally Morgan is a well-respected name in the psychic community. Known as "Britain's Best-Loved Psychic," she has mesmerized audiences with her astonishing mediumship and clairvoyance. Sally's warm and compassionate approach has won her a massive following, including celebrities and royalty, seeking guidance and solace from her abilities.
Derek Acorah (In Memoriam): The late Derek Acorah was one of the most famous mediums in the UK. His appearances on popular television shows like "Most Haunted" brought him into the spotlight, where he showcased his exceptional skills in communicating with the spirit world. Derek's charm and genuine desire to help others made him a beloved figure in the psychic community.
Psychic Sisters - Jayne Wallace: Jayne Wallace, along with her team of gifted psychics, founded the Psychic Sisters. This London-based psychic haven has garnered a reputation for providing accurate readings and spiritual services. Jayne's diverse skills in tarot reading, crystal healing, and mediumship have earned her a loyal clientele, including numerous celebrities.
Gordon Smith: A true mediumship maestro, Gordon Smith is renowned for his ability to connect with departed loved ones and deliver evidential messages from the other side. His down-to-earth nature and unwavering dedication to his craft have made him a cherished mentor to aspiring psychics, ensuring the continuation of his legacy.
Michele Knight: With a vast online presence, Michele Knight has captivated audiences worldwide with her insightful readings and astrological predictions. As an accomplished psychic, astrologer, and tarot card reader, Michele's warm and uplifting demeanor has earned her the trust of many seeking guidance in their lives.
Sally Buxton: Known for her innate ability to communicate with animals, Sally Buxton has carved a unique niche in the psychic world. Referred to as the "Pet Psychic," she has helped countless pet owners understand their furry friends better and provided closure for those who have lost beloved companions.
Kim Alexis: A gifted clairvoyant, Kim Alexis, possesses the rare talent of remote viewing. Her accurate descriptions and detailed insights into distant locations and events have earned her a reputation as one of the UK's most intriguing psychics.
Read More Info :- Top Psychics In The UK.
These top psychics in the UK have demonstrated their extraordinary abilities time and again, captivating audiences and offering guidance to those in need. It's essential to approach psychic readings with an open mind, understanding that each practitioner has a unique style and expertise. While the allure of the psychic world remains ever-present, these gifted individuals continue to inspire and provide comfort through their exceptional talents, leaving an indelible mark on the lives they touch.
0 notes
Text
Intro post
Thought I should finally get round to making this (active May 2024)
(block don't report 💗)
Dm's are always open for any one who needs to talk or just wants to be friends 💌
Hi im Ellie 👋🏻
age: 19 🤍
UK 🇬🇧
Astrology:
●Sun Taurus♉️
●Moon Libra♎️
●Rising Scorpio♏️
Tw ed & $h
Stats
cw: 84.8lbs /38.4kg 💗 (May 2nd 2024)
bmi: 17.3
height: 4'10 /148cm
Sw: 100lbs /45kg ?
Gw: 70lbs /32kg
I don't really know why I'm doing this but a lot of it is to do with the comments my mum makes and how she always tells me I'm going to get fat if I don't eat healthy and exercise🍽
Sometimes post about $h iswell which is also mostly cuz of family 🩸🩹
I've had an ed on and off since i was 16 and $h since 17, sometimes get really depressed and almost attempted to off my self in Feb 2023 but didn't end up going through with it.
Some random things
I want to travel the world, so far i have been to 5 countries🌍
I love anything to do with the universe, space and astrology🌌
I sometimes do tarot card readings and always have crystals bracelets on🔮🧿
I'm a little bit psychic, I don't have dreams often but when I do they often predict the future✨️
I love romance movies, star wars, the hunger games, my fave movie is 10 things I hate about you💕
I'm always picking up random hobbies🛼🎨🪡
I love baking (which is a little bit weird considering I try not to eat and constantly count calories)🍪🎂🥞🍦🍰🥐🧁🧇
My top 10 music artist at the moment🎵
One direction
Artic monkeys
Taylor swift
Lana del ray
Harry styles
Nail horan
Maisie peters
Noah Khan
Lorde
The vamps
#intro post#intro#$h tw#tw 3d shit#tw a4a#tw 4n4rexia#tw eating issues#tw s3lf harm#tw m1a#tw m14#i wanna be tiny#⭐️rving#4nerex1a#$h#$elf h4rm#$h tumblr#3d thoughts#3d not sheeran#3dtumblr#introduction#ed blogg#blog intro#blog info#girl blogger#vent blog#3d relapse#3d vent
17 notes
·
View notes
Text
My Thoughts on the First Three Episodes of X-Men 97
I was hoping to do the 3 episodes separately but i've been really busy, so I'll do all 3 episodes altogether. Sorry if i've missed anything.
Spoilers
X-Men 97 is awesome, I love the animation and the mature tone, it already has some blood and swearing in it already.
I love that they gave the intro a update, they included Morth and Bishop, got rid of Warpath and the purple headed guy, with Lady Deathstrike and Emma Frost.
Originally the old line up was Cyclops, Wolverine, Rogue, Storm, Beast, Gambit, Jubilee, Jean Grey and Professor X.
It is now changed to Cyclops, Jean got bumped up to 2nd, Storm is now 3rd, Wolverine 4th, Morph is 5th, Rogue 6th, Beast 6th, Gambit 7th, Jubilee 8th, Bishop 9th and kept Professor X at the end
Love the voicing acting, some of of the changes to some voice actors haven't bothered me. I took to the changes very quickly.
The fight scenes have been brilliant, very well choregraphed.
The first episode, To Me, My X-Men, was great.
Gambit in a crop top was hilarious.
Love the big picture of the original X-Men with Professor X. I hope we see Iceman and Archangel again soon
Love Morph. At one point, when I saw Archangel, I didn't realise Morph changed into him, lol. it also happened again, in the next episode when he was Lady Deathstrike.
I thought Jean was going to faint after going into Henry Gyrich mind lol but should she be doing that while pregnant.
Cyclops using his optic blasts to land was awesome.
The fight scene's between the X-Men and the Sentinels was great.
The 2nd episode, Mutant Liberation Begins was also great, bit of a mixture of emotion and funny moments.
I'm glad they kept the 'Previously on X-Men'
I love that give the intro an update and Magneto is now part of the line up is now 1st.
Wolverine reacting to Jean going into Labour and driving like a lunatic was hilarious.
Baby Nathan is cute, I laughed when Jean said to Scott that the baby has his eyes..
Love the sisterhood moments between Jean and Storm.
Love the fight scene's between the X-men and X-Cutioner. I could tell he's voiced by Cable's old voice actor.
Storm losing her powers was pretty emotional
I'm not that familiar with Rogue and Magneto's relationship in the comics, I know she had a fling with Joseph, Magneto's clone. I did used to get the X-Men comics but it was under Essential X-Men in the UK ( it was 3 comic books in one book) I started during the Onslaught Saga (I can't remember when I stop but it was before Jean died for 100th time and Cyclops got with Emma Frost) but anyway It does seem a little creepy as Rogue is her 20s maybe and Magneto possibly is in his 70s, but I'm intrigued to see what happens but do I feel sorry for Gambit though.
Fire Made Flesh was a great episode, very intense and emotional, but it felt hard to watch because of baby Nathan being put in a containment tube and being infected by the techno virus.
I did wonder why Bishop was here at first. I thought maybe he got fed up going back to the future and finding out nothing has changed so he decided to stay in the past lol, but it was because his time traveling device was broken.
I didn't notice Storm was taken out in the intro, the first time round.
The episode had some pretty creepy moments, Morph in the shower scene. Gambit seeing Magneto and Rogue sort of melted together ect.
I didn't realise who Morph changed into at first as I don't know much about Illyana Rasputin, all I know she's Colossus's sister and she died of a virus in the comics. I should read more about her.
Jennifer Hale voice acting performance, voicing both Jeans was brilliant.
The psychic moment between the the 2 Jeans was great.
I do wonder when Sinister swapped the 2 Jeans, I think maybe during the episodes Beyond Good and Evil.
So clone Jean has renamed herself Madelyne Pryor and has decided to leave. I wonder if she comes back.
Storm appears at the end and is approached by Forge , hopefully he can bring her powers back.
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
So. I made a terrible mistake. I started watching 'Stranger Things', and now my brain is just full of Thoughts and Feelings after only two episodes.
I managed to sidestep it completely initially, but then when series 4 came out certain people whose blogs I enjoy reading lost their minds over Eddie Munson (looking at you @kedreeva!) And I enjoyed reading meta and fan things and looking at gif sets.
Then I thought 'I would have loved this as a teenager.' And then I realised that my tastes haven't changed all that much in 20 years, and maybe I should check it out. (New stuff can be hard for me to get into).
I'd already been spoiled for a lot of things, and because I don't deal well with horror elements I went and spoiled myself more so I knew if/when not to look.
However, how I managed to miss that Winona Ryder was in this is a mystery.
Feels:
Joyce is an amazing character and I love her. I especially liked the fact that she realised how much her initial reaction to Will's disappearance (before they realised something was really really wrong) of blaming Jonathan was unfair, AND made sure he knew that and that she was wrong to say it.
I love the boys. They seem very very real to me, the way they slide from silly kids to almost sensible, and the conflict between the right thing to do if things were normal (tell a responsible adult), and the right thing to do in the actual reality of their situation.
Nancy and Mike's dad is a prat. Why isn't he helping to look for his son's friend? Grr. I do love the sibling dynamic between the older Wheeler kids.
Hopper really interests me. I look forward to to seeing more.
Millie Bobbie Browne is making her 'troubled waif with psychic powers' distinct from the many others and I am impressed.
My opinion of Nancy took a bit of a nosedive at the party. If you drag your best friend to a party she doesn't want to go to, you don't join in with applying peer pressure, you stand up for her. I really felt for Barb, being the odd one out sucks, and Nancy ditching her was bad behaviour. (I am not completely writing her off for a lapse of judgement, it's far more interesting having nuanced characters)
The sheer unfairness of this world: of all the inhabitants of Hawkins that I've met so far, the two that seem to least deserve being taken by monsters are the two that are (if we ignore the toddler). Things being supernaturally unfair on top of regular unfairness (deadbeat dads, bullying, Hopper's daughter) is a LOT.
The flashback showing Jonathan and Will listening to music was adorable. Will needs all of the hugs, and I was getting some definite ND feelings from him. I'll see if I was right later on. I really really want to see more of him.
Steve is hilarious, and a wonderful example of how dorky supposedly cool guys get when their emotions (and hormones) get involved. I await his character growth (and the Scoops Ahoy uniform) with great interest.
Mr Clarke is an awesome teacher. AV clubs weren't really a thing in the UK when I was at school, which I think is a shame.
I have run out of steam. Clearly more episodes are in order...
#stranger things#flailing#spoilers#this is kedreeva's fault with their meta and things#long post#this got away from me a bit
31 notes
·
View notes
Text
Among the Meghan-hating media fraternity, Jeremy Clarkson isn’t even king
Catherine Bennett
The invective of the former Top Gear presenter barely rose above the standard of an average incel
Sat 31 Dec 2022 18.00 GMT
Follow Catherine Bennett
Commiserations to Jeremy Clarkson: now his Sun column has been taken down, the celebrity must forfeit his chance to win the UK media’s most demented attack on Meghan award, 2022.
Fairness requires his article to be available for comparison with work from names including, in no particular order, Dan Wootton, Piers Morgan, Nigel Farage, Tom Bower, Brendan O’Neill of spiked and the Spectator’s Freddy Gray, not forgetting Richard Tice, Toby Young and Rod Liddle. Energised, perhaps, by the abundant material issuing from Montecito, more and more commentators are realising that a media career really can be based on, or refreshed by, repeating that the Duchess of Sussex is any or all of a talentless (yet cunning) mansion-dwelling liar, narcissist, bully, gold-digger, hypocrite and republic facilitator who stole “our” prince (Morgan: “dragged him out of the country off to your California mansion to fleece your royal titles”) whom she will dump – thanks to the demagogue-psychic Farage for this insight – when the time is right. To which the popular psychologist Dr Jordan Peterson tweeted: “This seems highly probable to me.”
Having said that, the trade is harder than it might look; the successful Markle-detractor must not only sustain Morgan-rivalling levels of abuse but produce some signature excuse for his feelings. An honourable mention, then, to Peterson who, new to the specialism, brought a scholarly perspective to bear on a Markle “archetype” podcast in which he’d been quoted (saying “I don’t think that men can control crazy women”). While compliant with Goldwater constraints on psychological speculation, Peterson added to his academic defence of “crazy women” the objection that Markle’s voice “just grates on me”. Elsewhere, the recently arrested career misogynist Andrew Tate seems to be the first of this men’s group to call her a bitch and worse. Why the anger? Unclear, but, invited on Morgan’s show, Tate recently regretted that “a lot of age-old traditions are being destroyed in real time”.
The above list should not, incidentally, be interpreted as some innate female inferiority in reviling Meghan. Credit is due, in fact, to the Daily Telegraph’s female team. The judges of this award are not, however, so “woke” as to favour less obsessive and comparatively pallid contributions to Meghan-hating by women, simply for the sake of diversity.
One challenge for specialist Markle-baiters is to balance, as Clarkson did not, the disturbed with the publishable
If it is any consolation to Clarkson, last year’s anti-Meghan content included work so outstandingly malignant that even after his article provoked international condemnation and record-breaking complaints, he may not have triumphed. True, the description of Meghan as worse than the serial killer Rose West is memorable, likewise his dream of the day that Meghan – since the writer hates her “on a cellular level” – “is made to parade naked through the streets of every town in Britain while the crowds chant, ‘Shame!’ and throw lumps of excrement at her”. But original? Our judges noted that this sort of sexualised, unashamedly pathological fantasy about a determined and attractive woman would probably be considered fairly basic in online groups favoured by resentful incels.
Moreover, one of the challenges for specialist Markle-baiters is to balance, as Clarkson did not, the disturbed with the publishable. As familiar as it is for some men to be triggered by female success into the sort of behaviours academics have summarised as “masculine over-compensation”, the Meghan-averse, like Greta Thunberg’s haters (as Clarkson shows, there is significant overlap), must keep in mind the need not to come across as worryingly invested or, to borrow Peterson’s jargon, crazy.
Tom Bower, a strong contender for this year’s award, could probably have pulled off his Nazi analogy, “Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s propagandist, would look with real awe at what the Sussexes and Netflix have achieved”, and even his conspiratorial “Doria plays a really sinister role in this whole story”. It helped that he was speaking on a channel where Meghan hysteria is pretty much normalised. But people noticed when he told viewers of Good Morning Britain: “It’s Meghan I’m after.”
That the would-be shit-pelter Clarkson is to keep his TV shows and newspaper columns should not, as much as it has thrilled his fans, be taken to mean less eminent contributors would survive. Careful misogynists might be better advised to study the way his rivals will, for instance, elevate otherwise standard exercises in vituperation with a dash of compassion, a mention of the cost of living crisis, learned regret for Meghan’s limitations. “In a strangely lobotomised way,” Gray says of his muse, “Meghan seems to have been influenced by the theories of Carl Jung.”
Alternatively, notice how seasoned Meghan antagonists offer deep constitutional feeling as a justification for their insults and disgusted faces: “Princess Pinocchio”, “your narcissistic delusionist (sic) wife”, “the ginge”, “poisonous rats”. The guild’s settled understanding, after the Netflix series, that the Sussexes represent, in Morgan’s words, “an existential threat to the British monarchy”, allowed for some peerless abuse from lead members of the fraternity, notably in the popular Meghan-hating double acts. The aim of this collaborative format being for participants to goad one another into ever more extravagant denunciations of the Sussexes. In particular the Wootton-Bower combo reliably appals, the host nodding while the writer insists, for example (confident that Wootton won’t mention Andrew Morton), that Diana was never, like her son, “duplicitous”. Wootton (confident that Bower won’t mention Panorama), agrees that Diana never did anything so vile as criticise the institution.
To pick a winner from this wealth of invective has occasionally felt like an impossible task. But the most precious is, surely, a piece by the distinguished Marxist turned Markleist, Brendan O’Neill. Not for pyrotechnics but for so brilliantly encapsulating Meghan’s often fascinating effect on the male mind. “Go away,” he begs the belle dame of Montecito, “Leave me alone.” He made the same request in 2020.
Catherine Bennett is an Observer columnist
#meghan markle#duchess of sussex#jeremy clarkson#dan wootton#piers morgan#nigel farage#tom bower#the guardian#catherine bennett
18 notes
·
View notes
Note
I struggle learning how to read the pendulum! Do you know any books are you happy to share how you've learned to do this?
I can't think of any books off the top of my head, but I am sure any psychic primer would have a method included. I can't recall if Matt Auryn's Psychic Witch has a pendulum exercise, but I would imagine it would. Even if not, the techniques of meditation and self hypnosis would be enough to get you going.
I learned from a witch to be honest. I bought my first pendulum at a local occult store after school. I miss the days when those types of stores were more common in the UK, they are rare now in smaller cities. This woman was a practicing witch and she showed me how she worked with her pendulum.
She would get centred first- which is hard at first, but if you meditate it gets easier to get into that state of mind at will. What I do is take some deep breaths and then count down into a meditative state from 11 to 0. 11 simply because it's a Thelemic number. Most people would do 10 to 0 probably, but it matters little, it is arbitrary. I also sometimes visualise myself in a lift going down floors, it has the effect of deepening consciousness. This seems very new-agey, but it works.
The idea is you clear your mind, you want to focus only on the question. You want to forget you are holding a pendulum, you want to be focused only on the question and think not about the answer. If you think about the answer you can influence the direction of the pendulum unconsciously.
It is also a good idea to invoke a being you work with prior to the working. Or a being associated with divination. I invoke the HGA or Hekate as I do in all my divination works.
Then you start with 'What is yes?' and note the direction the pendulum swings. Then ask 'what is no?' and note that too. I never ask for 'unlikely' or 'maybe'. The reason for this is, that I can tell when my pendulum is uncertain- my pendulums always go back and forth for yes and left to right for no. If it is unsure it tends to jiggle between the two and spin in a circle. You will come to learn as you practice.
You can also make charts- you can find many pendulum charts online for free which allows for you to get detailed answers. You can use it as an ouija board pointer, you can look at weather, you can use it over a map, you can use it anywhere to which it can point. The possibilities are quite large.
An interesting experiment I conducted was I made my partner, who does not practice any form of magic, hold my pendulum. I placed my hand on his heart and I directed energy into him and asked questions to the pendulum silently in this manner. I got responses, and they differed with each question. I also asked basic things like "Am I a male, is today Tuesday?" Things I could confirm to be true or false and it was correct each time. So then I asked about the future and again it came to pass.
My partner did not know what I was asking, nor did he understand why the pendulum was going in different ways. There was also no possibility of influence from my own mind or his in this setting. This made the results far more reliable in my opinion in a strange way.
I digress, but I really do think the pendulum is an underrated magical tool, and one I am guilty of underusing too these days. Every altar should have one!
Clear your mind, ask your question, focus your question, when you feel the pendulum move look at the response. Another tip- if the pendulum struggles to move at first spin it around clockwise once violently and ask again and it should alter direction from spinning- unless your pendulum responds with a clockwise motion for yes or no, then don't do it!
2 notes
·
View notes
Note
Hello I can't remember the last time I watched Tangled the movie as well as the tv series but was shocked to find out about the controversies surrounding Chris Sonnenburg and the accusations from the former staff of a toxic work environment. I also read a post that you confronted him about racism within the series and movie. Would you mind telling me what the racist moments were in the series and movie that you pointed out? I want to understand the situation better, thanks.
I'd first like to clarify that I didn't confront him. I wasn't even talking to him. I was having a conversation with someone else, and he commented on it something like, "And here's where I bow out." And then we never saw him on Tumblr again.
As for racist moments, the movie has an all-white cast. Even background characters. There is not a single POC in Tangled, even though there are crowd scenes with hundreds of people in them.
And while there are POC in the series, the Black people are all pretty trope-ish. While I adore Lance, Xavier and Quaid (and Ruthless Ruth), there is still a sense of tokenism to them which I wish the creators hadn’t let happen. Lance is the token black guy in the main cast, who is mostly comic relief and doesn’t get much of a character arc of his own, on top of which, he begins the series as a criminal. Xavier is the magical negro trope. Quaid and Ruth drift away from the tokenism a bit, but they’re still each only there for an insignificant amount of time. (It’s kinda badass that Ruth was a proprietress and Quaid is basically Tangled’s answer to Bass Reeves, though.)
Then there's Madame Canardist. She was created for the movie, but not used (you can spot Vigor in the credits, though), so I can't even blame this entirely on the show (though they could have done something to make her less of a racist caricature). Madame Canardist is a harmful stereotype of a Romani person, frequently and negatively called a g*psy. (That word is as taboo as Esqu*mo and neither should be used.) They are not all fortune-tellers. They are not all mystics. They are not all swindlers. They do not all live in painted wagons. And they are a people who are alive today who are still being persecuted.
Vigor, himself, is a racist stereotype. Psychic monkey in a turban was an oft-used racist caricature for Indian people, back when the mysticism and glamor of the East was all the rage in the US and the UK. The fact that such imagery has persevered to this day shows how little people know or think about the stereotypes.
And then there's the Separatists of Saporia. I have seen people criticize them for being Middle Eastern-based (if nothing else, they are all POC, regardless of what race they are), and having a group of POC take over a predominantly white kingdom in a terrorist move... well, I hope you can see why that's a problem. Even Petunia (the Daylight Thief pretending to be Kiera's mother) is a villain.
The series definitely did better than the movie, in that it included POC at all, but as the saying goes, "They did better, but there's still room for improvement." I acknowledge that there has been progress in the Tangled franchise. But a lot of the issues are a complete tonedeafness to societal issues. I don't think the decisions were necessarily made in malice, but that doesn't mean we can't criticize them.
Before I close this out, I would like to bring up Gothel, and by extension Cassandra. Many people think Gothel is an antisemitic caricature, but I disagree, primarily because her design is based on the looks of Donna Murphy (her voice actor) and Cher, neither of whom are Jewish. Not to mention, the movie was written by a Jewish man, and I find it hard to believe that he would have deliberately written antisemitic tropes into his movie. I think Gothel is an unfortunate coincidence. However, I am also not Jewish, and I am not at all attempting to say that Jewish people who feel slighted are wrong. I have seen convincing arguments both for and against the idea, all from Jewish people, so it's not as if there's a unified front.
#Tangled#Tangled the Series#Lance Strongbow#Xavier the Blacksmith#Quaid#Ruthless Ruth#Madame Canardist#Vigor the Visionary#Separatists of Saporia#Petunia#Mother Gothel#Cassandra#TTS#Analysis#Racism#Answered
24 notes
·
View notes
Text
Hypnotic (2023)
"Determined to find his missing daughter, Detective Danny Rourke finds himself spiraling down a rabbit hole while investigating a series of reality-bending crimes. Aided by Diana Cruz, a gifted psychic, Rourke simultaneously pursues and is pursued by a lethal specter, the one man he believes holds the key to finding the girl."
For the first time in a very long time I went into a film, almost completely, blind. I hadn't seen any trailers and, until Odeon announced a limitless member viewing, I don't even think I'd heard of it. Before the viewing I checked out Google for the poster and the précis at the top of this, but that was all I knew. I think this was absolutely the best way to go into this movie.
I'm going to have to be very careful with what I say because I always try to avoid spoilers, and that could be difficult. Please bear with me. The film is categorised as a thriller/mystery and to that I say yeah, thats pretty accurate. This was, for me, a real rollercoaster ride. When I saw that it was directed by Robert Rodriguez the style, and stylised action, suddenly made so much more sense. Rodriguez presents us with a world just a little different to our own, and does it in such a way that we still recognise a lot of what we see. It also means that the differences, such as they are, keep us in the story rather than pull us out. He is a skilled director that has made some iconic films. Whether this one will be looked at the same as El Mariachi and Sin City is doubtful, but it's definitely an addition to his catalogue that he should be very happy with.
The three main characters are Danny Rourke, played by Ben Affleck, Diana Cruz (Alice Braga) and Dellrayne (William Fichtner). Now I'll hold my hands up and admit I'm not Affleck's biggest fan. He's never really grabbed me during most of his films though I've never really disliked his films. That may have changed with Hypnotic. Here he plays a weary, psychologically disturbed, cop who is trying to find his daughter and he nails it. Throughout the film he handles the layers of his character with ease. I found myself rooting for him against odds that were stacked heavily against him. Bravo Ben, you may just have won me over.
I have seen Alice Braga in a number of films. I always enjoy her when she's on screen and here, yet again, she was a net positive to the film. I can honestly add her to the list of people that if I see they're in a film I know I'll probably enjoy it. William Fichtner has one of those instantly recognisable faces, and as soon as I saw him on screen I knew he would be the antagonist to Affleck's protagonist. He plays a villain/bad guy like he was moulded to it his entire career and he was suitably creepy and villainous here.
Overall this is a great film. I really enjoyed it. It has solid action scenes, some extreme violence and a few scenes of gory stuff and it all blends together into a pretty damn good Robert Rodriguez movie. Now I don't normally mention other critics scores in my reviews, but when I came out of the screening I looked on Google. I saw scores that ranged from 35% up to 5.7/10. I haven't read any othwr reviews and I'm not going to. Instead I'm going to give it a really solid 8.5/10, with a recommendation to go see it when it's released in the UK on the 26th May.
3 notes
·
View notes
Link
#APOWERFULNATIVEBINDINGLOVESPELLDR.MUCHINDU#ISLAMIARABICDIVINELOSTLOVEMEDIUM#LONDON#Norway&Singapore#POLAND#SPAINLOVEMEDIUMPSYCHIC#SpiritualPsychic[+254700807659]inUSA#TRUSTEDINTERRACIALLOVEMARRIAGEHEALERDR.MUCHINDU#TRUSTEDTRADITIONALISTINALLCOUNTIESDR.MUCHINDU#UK
0 notes
Link
#APOWERFULNATIVEBINDINGLOVESPELLDR.MUCHINDU#ISLAMIARABICDIVINELOSTLOVEMEDIUM#LONDON#Norway&Singapore#POLAND#SPAINLOVEMEDIUMPSYCHIC#SpiritualPsychic[+254700807659]inUSA#TRUSTEDINTERRACIALLOVEMARRIAGEHEALERDR.MUCHINDU#TRUSTEDTRADITIONALISTINALLCOUNTIESDR.MUCHINDU#UK
0 notes
Text
Natalie Sist interviews Jill Carr on Blog Talk Radio Wednesday April 24th 1-2pm est
Jill Carr, began seriously studying astrology as an art student. where she came across the Modern Textbook of Astrology in a city bookshop. Since then, she has studied and worked in various locations within the UK, refining her research into all matters astrological, including Chinese Astrology, which she finds endlessly fascinating.
Jill has degrees in Surface Pattern Design, Business Studies, and Philosophy and Aesthetics. She spent over 30 years living and working in the county of Shropshire, near the Welsh border, where she walked the hills and climbed the mountains of Wales. She has now settled in the wonderfully inspiring county of Cornwall, surrounded by the natural beauty of this ancient place. Jill's other interests include yoga, swimming, playing music and singing, as well as painting and exploring the coastline of Cornwall.
0 notes
Text
Best Indian Astrologer in Nottingham, UK
Master Shiva is a renowned Famous, Top and Best Indian Astrologer in Nottingham who provides astrological services such as in evil spirit removal expert, love back specialist astrologer, health problems astrologer, husband and wife problem solution, jealously and curse removal, love relationship problems solution, negative energy removal expert, powerful love spells, psychic reading, removing witchcraft, spiritual healing, stop cheating partner, stop separation, voodoo spell caster etc.
Expert in Providing Accurate Solutions for:
Evil Spirit Removal Expert
Love Back Specialist Astrologer
Health Problems Astrologer
Husband and Wife Problem Solution
Jealously and curse Removal
Love Relationship Problems Solution
Negative Energy Removal Expert
Powerful Love Spells
Psychic Reading
Removing Witchcraft
Spiritual Healing
Stop Cheating Partner
Stop Separation
Voodoo Spell Caster
For More Details:
Contact Us: +44 7432479339
Website: www.mastershivaastro.com
#Best Indian Astrologer in Nottingham#Best Astrologer in Nottingham#Best indian Astrologer in Nottingham#Famous Indian Astrologer in London#Famous Indian Astrologer in UK#Get Love Back Astrologer in Nottingham#Best Astrologer In World In Nottingham#Best Astrologer In World In London
0 notes
Text
Famous Psychic Reader in Ontario
Master Krishna ji is a true Vedic top astrologer in Toronto, Psychic as he obtained the best ability in communication, which gives you a better form of intellect with his client. His passion for astrology provides many people with a happy life. He provides astrology services in various countries like USA, Canada, UK, India, etc. His goal in his life is to help people and guide the right path through his great knowledge of astrology.
0 notes
Last Seen Blogs
ludvikotevrel
Ludvík Otevřel
verisimilitudi
ungodly hour
amith9
Untitled
songquotations
Yes I am iconic, bitch
drycleaningconveyorforsale
site visit