gettyentertainment

"Rebel Moon - Part One: A Child Of Fire" Los Angeles Premiere featuring Sofia Boutella, Djimon Hounsou, Charlie Hunnam, Cleopatra Coleman, Garrett Hedlund, Michiel Huisman, Ed Skrein, Staz Nair, Fra Fee, Bae Doona, E. Duffy, Jena Malone, Ray Fisher, Tig Notaro, and more on December 13, 2023 in Los Angeles, California.

[240412] ATEEZ @ 2024 Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival (Weekend 1 - Day 1)

Credit: Getty Images

Draymond Green + Patrick Beverley as text post memes

Through the Years → Felipe VI of Spain (2,392/∞) 28 August 2019 | King Felipe of Spain is seen arriving to visit King Juan Carlos at Quiron Hospital in Madrid, Spain. (Photo by Europa Press Entertainment/Europa Press via Getty Images)

Indio, US

Björk performs at the Coachella festival in California

Photograph: Santiago Felipe/Getty Images for ABA

Up next on my 80's Fest Movie and TV Marathon...Mannequin (1987) on glorious vintage Media Home Entertainment VHS 📼! #movie #movies #comedy #romcom #romanticcomedy #mannequin #vintage #vhs #andrewmccarthy #KimCattrall #estellegetty #GWBailey #jamesspader #80s #80sfest #durandurantulsas4thannual80sfest #MeshachTaylor

Please don’t use midjourney it steals art from pretty much every artist out there without any compensation. I didn’t know this at first and tried it but then during the creation process i saw water marks and Getty image logos (though I’m sure they’ve hidden that now) so it’s definitely stealing.

No, it isn't. And you've taken the wrong lesson from the Getty watermark issue.

AI training on public facing, published work is fair use. Any published piece could be located, examined, and learned from by a human artist. This does not require the permission of the owner of said work. A mechanical apparatus does not change this principle.

All we, as artists, own, are specific expressions. We do not own styles, ideas, concepts, plots, or tropes. We do not even own the work we create in a proper sense. All our work flows from the commons, and all of it flows back to it. IP is a limited patent on specific expressions, and what constitutes infringement is the end result of the creative process. What goes into it is irrelevant, and upending that process to put inspiration and reference as infringement is the end of art as we know it.

The Getty watermark issue is an example of overfitting, wherein a repetitive element in the dataset over-emphasizes specific features to the point of disrupting the system's attempts at the creation of novel images.

No one denies that the SD dataset is trained on images Getty claims to own, but Getty has so polluted the image search functions of the internet with their watermarked images that the idea of a getty watermark has been picked up the same way the AI might pick up the idea of an eye or a tree branch. It is a systemic failure that Shutterstock and Getty can be so monopolistic and ubiquitous that a dateset trained on literally everything public facing on the internet would be polluted with their watermarks.

Watermarks that, by the way, they add to public domain images, and that google prioritizes over clean versions.

The lawsuits being brought against Midjourney and Stable Diffusion are copyright overreach being presented as a theft tissue. The facts of the matter are not as the litigants state. The images aren't stored, the SD weights are a 4 gig file trained on 250 terabytes, roughly 4 bytes per image. It runs local, does not reach out to image sources over IP. All you've got are mathematical patterns and ratios. I would go so far as to say that the class action suit is based on outright lies.

But for a moment, let's entertain the idea that what goes into a work, as inspiration, can be copyrighted. That styles can be stolen. That what goes in defines infringement, rather than what comes out. What happens then?

Well, the bad news is that if Stable Diffusion and Midjourney were shut down tomorrow, Stable Diffusion is in the wild. It runs local, it's user-trainable. In short, the genie isn't going back in the bottle. Plus, the way diffusion AI works, there's no way to trace a gen to its sources. The weights don't work like that. The indexing would be larger than the entire set of stored patterns.

Well good news, there's an AI for that. The current version is called CLIP Interrogator And it works on everything. Not just AI generated, but any image. It can find what style it closely matches, reverse engineer a prompt. It's crude now, but it will improve.

Now, you've already established that using the same patterns as another work is infringement. You've already established that inspiration is theft. And now there's a robot that tells lawyers who you draw like.

Sure, you can fight it in court. If it goes go to court. But who's to say they won't just staplegun that AI to a monetization re-direction bot like youtube has going with their content ID? Awesome T-shirt design you uploaded to your print-on-demand shop... too bad your art style resembles that from a cartoon from 1973 that Universal got as part of an acquisition and they've claimed all your cash. Sure you can file a DMCA counter-notice, but we all know how that goes.

And then there's this fantasy that upending the system would help artists. But who would "own" that style? Is that piece stealing the style of Stephen Silver, or Disney's Kim Possible(TM)? When you work for Disney their contracts say everything you make is theirs. Every doodle. Every drawing. If the styles are copyrightable, a company could hire an artist straight out of school, publish their work under work-for-hire, fire them, and then go after them for "stealing" the style they developed while working for said corp.

Not to mention that a handful of companies own so much media that it is going to be impossible to find an artist that hasn't been influenced by something under their control.

Oh, and that stock of source images that companies like Disney and Universal have? These kinds of lawsuits won't stop them from building AIs with that material that they "own". The power goes into corp hands, they can down staff to their heart's content and everyone else is denied the ability to compete with them. Worst of all possible worlds.

Be careful what wishes you make when holding the copyright monkey's paw.

Daniel Ricciardo and Daniil Kvyat dance in the pit lane to entertain the fans after qualifying was suspended due to bad weather October 24, 2015 - Austin, United States Source: Mark Thompson/Getty Images

Dominique Fishback and Malia Obama at the Swarm premiere

Arnold Turner/Getty Images Entertainment/Getty Images

[240412] ATEEZ @ 2024 Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival (Weekend 1 - Day 1)

Credit: Getty Images

august slipped away into a moment in history 🕰✨

📸: Beth Garrabrant, Arturo Holmes for Getty Entertainment

Josephine's Pearls. American born dancer, jazz singer and entertainer Josephine Baker (1906 - 1975), ca. 1925 | src getty images

Through the Years → Felipe VI of Spain (2,379/∞) 29 July 2019 | King Felipe VI of Spain receives Canary Island President Angel Victor Torres at Zarzuela Palace in Madrid, Spain. (Photo by Europa Press Entertainment/Europa Press via Getty Images)

Entertainment Tonight: Zendaya is praising Tom Holland in more ways than one!Z was asked in a recent interview which of her 'Dune' castmates had the most rizz a slang term for charisma and instead of naming a co-star, she pointed to her real-life boyfriend, Tom. She shared that he is "just naturally very good" at getting to know people, while she is "more shy and kind of quiet." Swipe to hear more of the sweet things Zendaya had to say and more at the link in bio.endaya had to say and more at the link in bio.

(o/:Getty Images, BuzzFeed Celeb)

Remembering David Jones, and sending thoughts to his family and friends.

(Footage in this edit from the Blu-ray set, Getty Images, Australian TV, Extra, the 1990s documentary; audio 1 from Peter's 1999 interview with GOLD 104.5.)

“Genuine, reliable and huggable, Peter is a natural person — really gets off on talent — loves other musicians and can jam along with the best of ‘em. I saw him holding his own with Hendrix, Stills, Young. He encouraged me no end. Bought me my first guitar and my first drum kit. […] He used to walk with a swagger, shining his arms with a confident air. He calmed hysteria, and lifted depression. ‘Dried banana, anybody? Piece of orange?’ — smiling, waving, running his hands through his hair. He knew all the crew by their first names. Kids crying at his feet he lifted and hugged like a father calming a child. […] He’s the most musically talented of us all by a mike. His songs are real. ‘For Pete’s Sake’ — which replaced the Monkees Theme at the end of some of the shows of the second season — is one of my all-time favorite songs by anybody. I’ve joked a lot about Peter giving everything away. But it was true. He was always giving his spare room to someone who needed it for the night — anyone. And he always seemed far away somewhere — in a different space. But I’m glad I know him. Of all the things he gave me, he gave me lots of laughs — and food for thought.” - Davy Jones, They Made A Monkee Out Of Me (1988) “I enjoyed [Micky] the most, respected Mike the most, and loved Davy the most.” - Peter Tork, Hartford Courant, February 26, 1982 “Davy adored performing, and adored meeting and greeting his fans. He was tireless in making himself available to sing a song, do a dance, shake a hand; whatever was asked. I had heart-to-heart moments with him that were among the best in my life. I was blessed to know and work closely with him. He was one in about 6 billion, give or take. We won’t see his like again. He left much too soon. I share your sadness. Thank you again for this chance to contribute. God bless and keep you all.” - Peter Tork in a note for a Pennsylvania memorial event for Davy, also shared via Peter’s official Facebook page, 2012 Peter Tork: “He was a master of many aspects of this kind of thing [entertaining], and, you know, and we had some very wonderful personal connections, and I’m really sad to see all that gone.” Q: “He just seemed to be a fun guy. I know he loved horses.” PT: “Sure did.” Q: “And obviously loved Peter.” PT: “Sure did. Loved him.” - 94.5 FM (Phoenix), 2013 “[Micky] and Mike and I have a very cordial relationship and share a lot of common topics. We go to lunch together when we’re all in town and have a good time. I love and respect each of these guys in their own way, although the real joys that I shared with Davy were special. At one point we had some good hard connections but as the years rolled on, those things faded away. But I am sorry to see Davy go. He was the one member in the group that I had the strongest human connection with. I still have two guys that I love and respect left from the band, but we share a different dynamic.” - Peter Tork, Review Mag, May 27, 2016