MatPat’s leaving ?????
Like I know some people don’t like him “Tumblrs going to be happy about this” blah blah blah
But. You do realize how big of an impact he’s had on theories/looking into lore. He’s one of the biggest reasons so many people look so deeply into different ransom elements. People have always done that, yes, but he gave so many people that first step into it, and gave a platform to some of the best parts of the internet.
The game theory collection of channels played one of the largest parts in me becoming so involved in caring about the stupid things I care about. It helped me grow as a critical thinker and allowed me a space to explore the silly things that no one else wanted to talk to me about.
I’m glad MatPats doing what he needs to, and I hope he has an amazing life. I thank him for his dedication to the channel, and thank him for changing my life.
So long, MatPat ❤️❤️❤️
2K notes
·
View notes
you know that post that's like the best way to deal with conspiracy theorists is to suggest an even wilder conspiracy (ex. "did you know the moon landing was faked?" "you believe in the moon?")?
well that but with tim and bernard. every time bernard gets a little too close to the bat secret, tim suggests something insane and then goes to great lengths to find (or occasionally manufacture) evidence for his stupid theory.
-----
bernard: okay hear me out, what if the second robin came back to life and is now red hood
tim: okay but what if red hood is actually joker from a different dimension where he didn't go mad and his life of crime escalated?
-----
bernard: i think the youngest robin might actually be blood-related to batman
tim: maybe the youngest robin is a literal demon that batman summoned and bound to him
-----
sometimes he goes a little too deep down the rabbit hole and manages to convince himself of his theories. And, on one notable occasion, one of theories actually turned out to be true and helped solve a case.
1K notes
·
View notes
Ok ok okkkk. So this Variety article has some great photos of Team Theorist, I'm totally stealing them, story for another day.
POOKIE GOT SOME ANSWERS?!
MATTHEW ROBERT PATRICK GET YOUR ASS BACK HERE, YA TROLL! YOU CAN'T SAY THIS IN VARIETY, YOU KNOW THIS SHIT IS ONLY READ BY MUGGLES!! MATTHEW, I ALMOST GOT A VIRUS JUST READING THIS BULLSHIT ON THEIR AD-RIDDEN BOOMER SITE; YOU CAN'T DO THIS TO ME, YOU MONSTER!!!!
192 notes
·
View notes
It's time for the fandom to start Looking Where the Furniture Isn't
For a bit of background, one of my irl professional responsibilities is to identify and avoid making undue assumptions. There are a LOT of things that we humans assume. We assume that terminology means the same to other people as it does to us. We assume everyone has the same context of a situation we do. We assume that we aren't missing any information.
We operate on the information we have.
There was an ask before season 2 aired asking whether many of the plot points had been revealed by the clips (which almost all took place during the first half of the first episode). Neil's response was something like "oh you sweet summer children you know nothing yet." And boy was he right.
Neil Gaiman is a master of controlling assumptions. Just look at his Tumblr askbox replies.
Here's a few s2 examples of assumptions we all made (as I'm starting a rewatch):
Why did Crowley do the (very fun and distracting) apology dance? You might say it was because he walked out on Jim, but he never specified, did he? And Aziraphale was surprised that he proposed they would hide him "together"
How did Shax get a rumor about something going down in the Up (presumably) before Gabriel even went downstairs?
Did Jim need to bring Aziraphale something other than the box? He never actually specifies; Aziraphale just assumes it's the box.
Why did Aziraphale assume Maggie could feel [Michael, Uriel, Saraquael] arriving?
Why does Aziraphale say Heaven would notice even a small miracle? Crowley is seen doing a miracle before their large miracle (traffic light), and later Aziraphale makes the guy leave the table at the pub
To go deeper:
Are we assuming that characters are telling the truth? Example: "Miracles don't work like that," "[Extreme sanctions] was just something we said to frighten the cherubs" etc.
Are we assuming that nothing of note happened between apocalypse v1 and s2? (ex. the claims that Crowley didn't tell Aziraphale about the trial in heaven despite him referencing it in s2s1) What if we the audience are just jumping in near the end of this story?
Are these assumptions correct? Or are we just working with the information that we have?
Now that I'm looking for it, there's also SO many corrections of assumptions (usually for the sake of a joke, but still) (these are just the ones that happen while I type them out while watching e2):
"Can I be a blue one?" "You haven't annoyed me yet" "But can I be?"
"You recognized [Michael, Uriel, Saraquael] those people who were in the shop just now?" "Of course, they were in the shop, just now!"
"oh my god!" "blasphemy, angel, that's not like you", "no, oh, my god"
Many of the themes were about hiding things in plain sight: the kids (and kids), Jim, "aim for my mouth but shoot past my ear." Clue (1985) was heavily referenced in the lead-up. The whole point of that film was looking at what was going on elsewhere. Looking where the furniture isn't, you might say.
The more I watch s2, the less certain I am that any of it makes sense on its own.
I'm currently combing through it to see if there are any discrepancies with where people are (easiest example is when Crowley just disappears from the bookshop while they're reviewing the Job story). It'll be a lot of data and might not lead anywhere, but I'll definitely share once I finish looking into it.
I will also honestly admit that these things are all circumstantial, and I could be going insane. But they just keep cropping up all over the place. I've got a lot of time before S3 comes up and I intend to investigate the furniture. And try to not make assumptions.
471 notes
·
View notes
Baby made their first .gif, yes yes, thank you i am proud of myself for braving technology!
What is everyone’s take on what he mouth’s here? To me, and have it be known I am incredibly bad at lip reading, it looks like:
“We need help.”
It also looks like he’s miming a ‘timeout’ signal.
please discuss and let me know your opinions lovebugs! and no, there is no dialogue that takes place during this gif if you’re unfamiliar. all these mouth movements are *silent* 👄
151 notes
·
View notes
so, a 3-part act makes sense, with the tone s2 set up, it also made me think:
where first act is hell,
second is purgatory
and third is heaven?
like a divine comedy maybe?
.
also the big one from the book/ 1x6 (probably the same thing as metatron calls it the second coming in 2x6)
the s2 really was more like a breathing space between s1 and s3.
Us against Them
conclusion: i need s3 like, immediately
987 notes
·
View notes