"why couldn't shuro have just been honest about what he felt with laios and falin it's not that hard" are you. are you White
234 notes
·
View notes
non-exhaustive list of canon powers Nico di Angelo either has shown or is heavily implied to have:
Shadow-travel
Manipulation of shadows/darkness (also possibly use of shadows as a pocket-dimension a la Magicians using the Duat in The Kane Chronicles)
Becoming intangible/shadows
Complete control over skeletons/bones (dead or alive, including summoning, reanimation, and/or changing shape of them) and being able to sense their presence
Summoning, reanimating, commanding, and dispelling the dead/undead (Skeletons, zombies, ghosts, etc & varieties) and being able to sense their presence
Ability to understand/communicate with the dead/undead and potentially other beings of the Underworld
Inherent complete comprehension of Latin
Ability to perceive the usually unperceivable/possibly look upon a deity’s true form without repercussion (at least moreso than the average demigod, though possibly is restricted to chthonic beings) (ex: Tartarus, potentially also interacting with his parents, etc)
Interacting tangibly with ghosts (implied to be a Ghost King thing rather than a Hades/Pluto thing)
Partial or complete immunity to different effects of the Underworld/things within (can consume food/drink of or in the Underworld without repercussions, effects from the Lethe wear off over time instead of being permanent like usual for mortals, etc)
Astral projection/”Walking in dreams”
Dream manipulation and projection (Sending dreams to others, etc.) (presumably includes sharing/projecting dreams with others) alongside inflicting sleep upon others even from a distance.
Illusions
Manipulation of emotions/aura that inflicts specific emotions on others (ex.: radiating fear/death onto enemies)
Projection of emotions and memories onto others (can be so forceful it causes physical damage like a shockwave)
Geokinesis (all forms but also specifically generating black marble) (presumably also specialized control over precious gemstones & non-paper currency)
Temperature manipulation (seemingly only lowering temperature)/creating frost)
Control/manipulation of souls, including living beings (ex: ripping out Bryce Lawrence’s soul)
Perceiving/reading/judging of souls (most likely also a Ghost King thing over Hades/Pluto thing, but possibly both)
Converting living into dead/undead, aka instakill (ex: disintegrating monsters to bone with one touch)
Lowering or manipulation of own vitals (breathing, heart rate, etc)
Death Trance/pseudo-hibernation (possibly also general control over states of consciousness at least for self, in combo with control over vitals & dreams)
Sensing death (impending or when it occurs, sometimes receiving dreams/visions of it occurring)
Able to sense other children of Hades/Pluto (potentially also other chthonic beings in general/able to identify based on sense alone) and also just living beings in general, such as mortals (possibly via souls).
Improved navigation underground/in the Underworld and ability to traverse restricted or normally unnavigable parts of the Underworld
Enhanced strength/abilities when in the Underworld
Inherently unnaturally quiet (possibly able to silence sound on a designated target)
Hiding/shielding self from being perceived (seemingly related to shadows/silence)
705 notes
·
View notes
still mad about this post lol so let me also say: “they taught us critical thinking in english class” is extra funny to me because there’s a genuine debate among Ed Heads about whether “critical thinking” as a discrete and decontextualized skillset can actually be taught :) so it’s pretty silly to go around confidently branding yourself as a critical thinker while simultaneously revealing that you’re extremely comfortable making assumptions about the relative simplicity of complex ideas which remain contested in their respective fields :) personally i would be pretty embarrassed to call myself a critical thinker if i also couldn’t stop myself from revealing i was totally lacking in the intellectual humility that would enable me to understand that we have yet to reach consensus on unbelievably complicated issues like how best to educate an entire population :) but i guess i was absent the day that tenth grade english covered running your mouth like an asshole on social media :)
161 notes
·
View notes
was recently party to a Terrible Plumbing Incident, so here are some shame-free tips for people whose parents never taught them how not to wreck a toilet:
never flush anything other than toilet paper or like,, a single paper towel (this excludes tiny things like bugs and chewed gum)
this ^ does NOT exclude things like pads, tampons, diapers. tragically, sometimes bio waste has to be thrown away. just bag it up.
if you’re taking a huge shit, flush halfway through so there’s less risk of it clogging the pipes
additionally, flush before you wipe for the same reason, and if you’re using a ton of tp, you can flush in the middle of that too. remember- no matter what they taught you about water conservation when you were a kid, it’s always better to be the guy who flushed a weird number of times than the guy who blocked up the toilet
relatedly, you do not need mummy hand when you wipe. 4-5 squares should do it when you pee, and if it’s messier (poop, period, etc), use that amount and just repeat until clean instead of using one huge wad
bonus:
if you go to the bathroom and leave any visible residue, you have to clean it up. if it’s on the seat, wipe it off. if it’s in the bowl, look around for one of those gross little brushes and see if you can scrub it away.
similarly, you should clean your toilet with a brush and actual toilet cleaner every few weeks if not every week, because it holds all the gross stuff and also is wet, so mold loves it in there
if you’re having a huge shit, turn on the fan lol
also, if you were neglected as a kid and you have questions about “basic” stuff like hygiene, chores, etc. because no one ever taught you, and you’re too nervous/embarrassed to ask anyone irl, you are more than welcome to send me a dm or an ask and I will do my best to help 💜
111 notes
·
View notes
Love being able to write. I can do whatever i want. I can make Ryuji interact w Lala-chan and u literally cant stop me.
35 notes
·
View notes
hi! just to clarify, are we able to check sources (field guides, birding apps, etc) to help us ID the species, or are we supposed to guess without looking anything up? so far ive just been guessing 😅
Howdy!
You can't cheat on a quiz that isn't graded.
That being said, the vision has always been to treat it like you're out birding. However you handle it out there is how you'd ideally play it here.
Ultimately, play this in a way that would be the most fun to you. The only prize is learning a bit more about bird identification.
🧡🦆
38 notes
·
View notes
Is it normal to ask a question at work via email to multiple professionals who have more expertise in the particular area, get a response from one of those individuals, find out you might have sent some of the wrong people your question email, and then spend the rest of the day panicking because if you think you look stupid? Even though one of the people you emailed was in fact the correct person to email, and that person helped you figure out what actually was going on because you didn't know what it was because you were not the specialist in that area, which is why you emailed three people because you knew one of those three would be the specialist that could help you? And one person was the specialist, who came and was able to help you figure out the next steps to work through the situation?
This can't be normal. I feel like normal people don't focus on whether or not they look stupid when they first of all got the answer to their question, and second of all did indeed find one of the people out of their email who could help them answer the question.
13 notes
·
View notes
essentially, any urge that I have ever had to have sex with someone as an ace person, even before I knew I was ace, has been an urge to fulfill a sexual role.
we live in an allonormative society. our society is built on the premise that two people will form exclusive sexual pairs. sex is incentivized under an allonormative society because it produces material benefits for those who abide by its rules. a man benefits from allonormativity in that sexuality is an act of conquest, and further, a means to produce children which serve as stores of wealth. a woman benefits less from allonormativity, but her value as a sex object for men grants her conditional, limited access to a man's resources by occupying the role of mother to his children.
a tranny, on the other hand does not have access to this role. a tranny's worth is derived solely from her ability to act as a sex object. she can be discarded at a moment's notice when she ceases to be useful.
because we live in an allonormative society, this holds true in queer culture as well, even in the absence of cisheteropatriarchal dynamics.
so what is a tranny that doesn't want to have sex, then?
worthless. why would you even waste your time thinking about it? it doesn't deserve the time of day. love? you think a tranny that you can't fuck deserves love? are you an idiot?
I fantasize about having sex with people from time to time because at least then I can imagine that I'm worth something in this allonormative society. any attempt I have ever made to seek out sex has been met with immediate disinterest because I make no attempt to hide the fact that I'm ace. I don't mean rejection; I mean my very existence is outright ignored.
worst of all, it feels impossible to discuss this. the idea of asexual people suffering from compulsory sexuality upsets allosexuals' sensibilities. clearly, they insist, my urge to have sex just proves that I'm faking it, that I'm not asexual, that I just want to feel special, that I'm just pretending to be oppressed.
what they don't understand is that my urge to have sex is essentially a form of self-harm. I could not even begin to explain the toll it has taken on my psyche and the damage it has done to my self-esteem. I would compare it to the urge to detransition; I know that if I detransitioned, I would gain access to privileges that are unavailable to me as a tranny. however, forcing myself to be something I'm not, something which is a massive contradiction to my very existence, is a march toward suicide. the urge to force myself to be allosexual is much the same.
there is no freedom to be found for me in indulging this urge. the greatest freedom I have found is in embracing my asexuality, in seeking out relationships with other asexuals, where there is no pressure to have sex, and where I can truly be myself.
52 notes
·
View notes
not even gonna tag this properly bc i don't wanna get Involved but i do have some Thoughts i need to get out into the void so here we go
(aaa quick edit: CW for mention/discussion of Boothill leaks)
11 notes
·
View notes
oomf was talking about this combi and I remembered the season 25 episode where they interact for like 30 seconds. and then i got progressively more invested
14 notes
·
View notes
Just making a general post real quick in response to an ask.
When I say I'm anti-ai I mean I'm against any sort of AI that steals from others or would otherwise be used to put people out of a job. I don't feel like having an elaborate conversation about the positives and negatives of AI and all that, so I'll state this as plainly as possible.
I don't like AI art. I don't like AI voice impersonations. I don't like any sort of AI that has to steal stuff from people without their consent in order to function. That is literally it.
I'm not against ALL AI. I don't think people that are okay with AI in general should be burned at the stake or something. I'm just an artist and writer that doesn't like AI being used in CREATIVE SPACES. That's it.
I didn't think I would have to clarify this but, here you go, for anyone that was bothered.
15 notes
·
View notes
Does anybody else feel like mental health awareness has done very little to help them in material reality
20 notes
·
View notes
Teehee, teehee, I finally finished my YHS fic!! It is extremely horrible and depressing to be prepared for that
It takes place after the halloween episode and focuses on James, Coolment, Sam and Nova!
22 notes
·
View notes
“I think I will write a self-indulgent fanfic,” I said. “I could even publish it anonymously, so it can be bad. I will just look up this minor detail in canon. And also this real-life system since they’d use a different one than I do. And also this particular set of customs. And also the lunar calendar. And also—”
145 notes
·
View notes
I'm rereading the Snowkit parts from the first arc and... There are several warrior cats plotlines where you can tell they have no idea what they're talking about when it comes to a certain condition or disability and this is definitely one of them.
"If Speckletail realizes for herself that Snowkit can’t learn, it might help her accept that he’ll never be a warrior." I don't know how to break this to you but Deaf and HoH people are actually definitely able to learn things, and the idea that they can't has a long and ableist history.
The whole idea that Snowkit got taken by the hawk because he couldn't hear the hawk or the warnings from his Clanmates relies on the stereotype that Deaf people are oblivious to everything around them, too. Snowkit isn't blind. If they wrote him as a person (and not as an object for Fireheart to pity) he would have hidden from the hawk like everyone else did because he would have seen them panicking, smelled their fear... used any of the other senses he has that tell him things about the world. The fact that they wrote him the way they did says a lot about their priorities when it came to writing a Deaf character imo: he's a plot device and an object for Fireheart to be sad about, so they didn't bother doing research.
17 notes
·
View notes
Alright uninformed rant time. It kind of bugs me that, when studying the Middle Ages, specifically in western Europe, it doesn’t seem to be a pre-requisite that you have to take some kind of “Basics of Mediaeval Catholic Doctrine in Everyday Practise” class.
Obviously you can’t cover everything- we don’t necessarily need to understand the ins and outs of obscure theological arguments (just as your average mediaeval churchgoer probably didn’t need to), or the inner workings of the Great Schism(s), nor how apparently simple theological disputes could be influenced by political and social factors, and of course the Official Line From The Vatican has changed over the centuries (which is why I’ve seen even modern Catholics getting mixed up about something that happened eight centuries ago). And naturally there are going to be misconceptions no matter how much you try to clarify things for people, and regional/class/temporal variations on how people’s actual everyday beliefs were influenced by the church’s rules.
But it would help if historians studying the Middle Ages, especially western Christendom, were all given a broadly similar training in a) what the official doctrine was at various points on certain important issues and b) how this might translate to what the average layman believed. Because it feels like you’re supposed to pick that up as you go along and even where there are books on the subject they’re not always entirely reliable either (for example, people citing books about how things worked specifically in England to apply to the whole of Europe) and you can’t ask a book a question if you’re confused about any particular point.
I mean I don’t expect to be spoonfed but somehow I don’t think that I’m supposed to accumulate a half-assed religious education from, say, a 15th century nobleman who was probably more interested in translating chivalric romances and rebelling against the Crown than religion; an angry 16th century Protestant; a 12th century nun from some forgotten valley in the Alps; some footnotes spread out over half a dozen modern political histories of Scotland; and an episode of ‘In Our Time’ from 2009.
But equally if you’re not a specialist in church history or theology, I’m not sure that it’s necessary to probe the murky depths of every minor theological point ever, and once you’ve started where does it end?
Anyway this entirely uninformed rant brought to you by my encounter with a sixteenth century bishop who was supposedly writing a completely orthodox book to re-evangelise his flock and tempt them away from Protestantism, but who described the baptismal rite in a way that sounds decidedly sketchy, if not heretical. And rather than being able to engage with the text properly and get what I needed from it, I was instead left sitting there like:
And frankly I didn’t have the time to go down the rabbit hole that would inevitably open up if I tried to find out
128 notes
·
View notes