#nursingdissertation | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

masteressayuk · 5 years

Text

How to teach mathematics

Whether you are living in 1st century or 21st century, you need to learn calculation and numbers to survive in this world. Because everything has some measurement. Everything has been related to numbers and quantities. And that quantity or that measurement can only be identified when a person knows what is 1, 2 and 3 or when he or she knows what is addition or subtraction or how to add and subtract.

But children either of 1st grade or 10th grade hate maths. They hate calculations and those algebraic expressions. No doubt those equations and sums are too difficult to do, but they are required to learn to solve them. Otherwise, his they will learn to find that measurement and quantity which needs bigger calculation than D.M.A.S. And such calculation really help them in the career path of aerospace, space sciences and so on.

Thus, it means maths is must. All there is need is to make the lessons and classes interesting. And it all depends on teachers. Teachers can make the subject interesting, only. There are many to attract students towards numbers and round off. There are many ways to make them lover of division and multiplication. But some of those pathways are:

Practical work: Instead of teaching by fingers in the classroom’s four walls, the best to teach them basics of maths is by playing with the toddlers. According to one of the study, children learn a lot from playing. A teacher can play any indoor or outdoor game with them whether it is Ludo, Monopoly, Football, cricket or any game else, because each has some counting. These games will clear their concepts about counting. Moreover, cricket and football can teach them, as well. Ludo, on the other hand can give the concepts of both addition and subtraction. Monopoly, gives them edge in multiplication, because there is loan to give. Other than games, stalls can be organized with the help of teachers in the school or near any park of any thing. These stalls’ installation help them to learn to add and subtract a lot. Because they have to find out that how much profit they have made or how much money they have collected from selling lemonades or bracelets or orange juice or anything else. Furthermore, calculations can be taught through cooking as well, because everything has to be added in the pan with perfect measurement. Thus, teacher can use anyway to teach them calculation, it can either be cooking, sports, stall or anything else. But one thing is to remember is that everything should be done in healthy environment.

Internet-the key to knowledge: Instead of using boards and markers, teachers can use projectors and different videos of YouTube to teach them maths, as well. There are many poetic videos on internet, which can give basic concepts of addition and subtraction to the students. Moreover, there are many websites that a teacher can use to teach. He or she can install a tablet or a PC in the room and let each of them do sums in their way. In this way, they learn to use computers and learn to do calculations. Furthermore, there are many applications which are made to teach maths to children. Such applications have animations and children friendly user interface that bind the students to that application and keep them doing the sums of addition and subtraction. Besides all of this, a teacher can make group of students and engage then to do sums and word problems on the tablet which is provided to them. In this way, they will learn to do maths with peers. And peers are the best teachers to get. Thus, they will make friends through it. And friendship teaches a lot. On the other hand, the moderator of the class can ask every student to explain the addition or calculation with the help of YouTube and internet. This will also engage them with learning mathematics.

So, these are the two ways to make the lessons of mathematics, calculations, D.M.A.S, numeration and many other topics interesting.

Maths is the must-learn subject. But it should be taught interestingly, otherwise, children won’t become experts in basics like professional essay writers in UK who are expert in writing. The world needs mathematicians too. But for it basics needs to be strong. And that can only be done by teachers.

#mathematics

#maths

#solution

#essaywriting

#essayservice

#writingservice

#cheapassignmentwriting

#freeonlinecontent

#expertwritersclub

#writingclubuk

#britishassignment

#professionalassignment

#funny

#hot

#trending

#socialsites

#uniquecontentwriters

#freeonlinewriters

#accounting

#nursingdissertation

#english

#science

#scientific

... See all

0 notes

mynursingessaypapers · 2 years

Text

PHI-413V Christian concept of the imago Dei and worldview essay

“Would you like assistance in this question or any other! Chat With Us Live On Our Website! https://mynursingessaypapers.com

1. What is the Christian concept of the imago Dei? How might it be important to health care, and why is it relevant?

2. According to your worldview, what value does a human person have? How does your position affect your stance on controversial bioethical issues, such as abortion, designer babies, and stem cell research?

PHI-413V Topic 1 Overview Foundational Issues in Christian Spirituality and Ethics

Introduction Welcome to Grand Canyon University’s course on Ethical and Spiritual Decision-Making in health care.

Some students may be apprehensive and object to taking this course because they feel such a course is not necessary for their major.

PHI-413V Christian concept of the imago Dei and worldview essay Yet Grand Canyon University has a long-standing Christian heritage, meaning that our Christian faith is fundamental to all that we do.

We want all students to feel welcome here, regardless of their religion or beliefs, but we also want all students to at least understand the Christian worldview and be challenged to think carefully about the deeper questions of life. In addition, this course serves several key purposes for training in health care.

First, it is important to understand that many of the foundational beliefs that the fields of medicine and health care take for granted (such as the intrinsic dignity and value of all human beings, regardless of race, gender, religion, socioeconomic status, etc.) are deeply held Christian values that come from the Christian worldview and have shaped the practice of medicine for almost 2,000 years.

Second, all human beings hold beliefs, live, and act in the context of their worldview. All decisions, including health care decisions, that human beings make are informed by their most deeply held values and beliefs which comprise a person’s worldview.

https://mynursingessaypapers.com

Thus, it is important to understand how a patient’s worldview will shape their decision-making and values in health care. Third, decision-making in health care often times involves ethical decisions about right or wrong, and it is crucial for health care practitioners to have an understanding of the nature of ethical decision-making, as well as some practical training.

Fundamentally, this course is about how the Christian worldview approaches various issues and questions in health care.

In understanding the Christian worldview, one will also come to learn how different worldviews might approach the same questions.

Some students may be unsure what their worldview is or have a worldview that is very different from Christianity and wonder how they will fit into such a class.

Everyone has a mixture of beliefs that make him or her unique. Please be assured that the goal is to help each student feel comfortable interacting with other students and to have a positive experience.

The College of Theology and instructors hope to encourage critical thinking about one’s worldview and purpose in life.

This is an opportunity to think about what you believe, challenge your assumptions, learn from others, and move forward on your unique life journey.

Throughout this course, you will be seeking wisdom. And from the Christian worldview, all wisdom comes from God.

This is why James, the brother of Jesus, wrote in his letter, “If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask God, who gives generously to all without reproach, and it will be given him” (James 1:5 NIV).

Understanding what a worldview is, and in particular the elements of Christian worldview, will help one understand the foundations of Christian spirituality and ethics. PHI-413V Christian concept of the imago Dei and worldview essay What Is a Worldview?

The following definitions are helpful: • “A set of assumptions or beliefs about reality that affect how we think and how we live” (Cosgrove, 2006, p. 19). • “The comprehensive perspective from which we interpret all of reality” (Keller, 2012, p. 157).

Worldview is often described as a set of lenses through which we view the world. As a descriptive lens, our worldview influences our perception of the world. What is true? What is reality?

As a prescriptive lens, our worldview influences our evaluation of what is true.

What does it mean? How should we live?

One may readily see that if one views the nature of the universe as consisting of only physical matter and energy, then that person’s understanding of the meaning of life and how we should live will likely be far different from one whose perception of the universe includes a spiritual realm where life continues after death and goodness is rewarded.

While it is true that all people have their own private worldviews with values and beliefs that have been shaped by culture, education, experiences, and relationships, it is also valuable to speak of shared worldviews, those foundational assumptions or beliefs that many people hold in common.

For the sake of this course, the course content will be reduced from the many-shared worldviews to three basic worldview families.

What Are the Three Basic Worldview Families?

Though there are many different worldviews, for the purpose of this course they have been simplified into three basic worldview families. ]

There are many variations within these families. PHI-413V Christian concept of the imago Dei and worldview essay

Atheism Atheism is the worldview of those who believe only in what their senses can detect— only what may be analyzed and understood in a scientific laboratory. This view believes in no God or spiritual realm.

The cosmos consists of only the natural or physical realm of matter and energy. Other names often associated with this worldview family are naturalism and secular humanism.

Most whose worldview values and behavior are aligned with atheism prefer to be considered agnostics.

These are uncertain of the existence of God, skeptical for the most part, yet open to the possibility.

Pantheism Pantheism is the worldview of spiritualism, the belief that “all is God” as the word implies. Pantheists believe in a spiritual realm, but no relational God who has revealed himself to humanity and is actively involved in the lives of those who believe in him.

This worldview family consists of the Eastern religions of Hinduism and Buddhism, as well as the more eclectic Western belief known as New Age.

Pantheists typically embrace an impersonal oneness of which all humans may become a part, becoming godlike themselves as they reach higher levels of spirituality.

Theism Theism, or monotheism, is the worldview of the three major religions, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.

Though these three have huge differences rendering them incompatible with each other, they do nonetheless have some similarities.

Theists all believe in a single, personal, and relational God who is the creator and sustainer of all that exists. They all likewise believe in absolute truth and morality, and an afterlife.

The focus of this course is Christianity, so the course will be comparing these three worldviews: atheism, pantheism, and Christianity.

Another common worldview name, deism, is somewhat of an enigma—having a basic belief in God, but a God who is not relational or involved in human life.

So although falling under the broad category of theism, deists may effectively live as atheists. Many people have complex worldviews that are a mix of various beliefs from the major worldview families.

PHI-413V Christian concept of the imago Dei and worldview essay

BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

In the same way that Christian spirituality finds its foundations in the reality of the triune God of the Bible, ethics also has its foundations in God.

Ethics, broadly speaking, is the study of good and bad, right and wrong. Every worldview has to explain the foundations of ethics (in line with worldview question #5 above) such that it explains the basis of what counts as good and bad, right or wrong.

In the Christian worldview, there is a God who exists and has created the world with a moral structure and purpose such that what is truly right and good is a reflection of God’s character.

God’s own holy, loving and perfect character is the standard of right and wrong. Badness or what is wrong is then defined as anything that is contrary to God’s character, his will, or to his design and purpose for his creation.

The Bible reveals what God’s character is like. Exodus 34:6-7 says, The LORD, the LORD, the compassionate and gracious God, slow to anger and abounding in love and faithfulness, maintaining love to thousands, and forgiving wickedness, rebellion and sin.

Yet he does not leave the guilty unpunished; he punishes the children and their children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation.

Similarly, 1 John 4:7-9 says, Dear friends, let us love one another, for love comes from God. Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God.

Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love. This is how God showed his love among us: He sent his one and only Son into the world that we might live through him.

Psalm 18:30 declares, “As for God, his way is perfect: The LORD’s word is flawless; he shields all who take refuge in him.” Many more verses could be surveyed, but the Bible makes clear that God is perfectly good and holy.

Knowing right and wrong then will mean knowing that which accords to God’s character. Right or wrong can be discovered in multiple ways.

It can be discovered in God’s creation by examining the natural world or by the use of human reason. In this way, one discovers God’s design for the way things are supposed to be by examining what is built into creation; this is often referred to as “natural law.” For example, one can know by means of reason and observation that murder is wrong or that a broken bone is bad and not the way it is supposed to be.

Conversely, one might come to know that feeding the homeless is good, and loving one’s spouse is right. One does not need to be religious or even believe in God to be able to know propositions of “natural law.” Nevertheless, the Christian worldview holds that these truths are built into the world by God.

Second, right or wrong can be discovered by reading the Bible or looking at the example of Jesus Christ.

The Bible reveals God’s commands and principles such as the Ten Commandments or the teachings of Jesus on the sermon on the mount. In addition, the Bible provides us with examples of virtuous people.

The perfect man and moral exemplar (though much more than only a man and an exemplar) in the Christian tradition is Jesus Christ himself.

The Christian is to not only obey God’s commands, but to be transformed into the kind of person that reflects the character of God.

Jesus Christ is the perfect representation of such a life; Christians, thus, ought to embody the virtues and character of Jesus himself.

The attaining of these virtues will not only be a matter of intellectual knowledge of right and wrong, but an active surrender and transformation by means of God’s own Holy Spirit.

The wisdom to navigate all the complexities of ethical decision-making will be a consequence of a person’s character and the active guidance of the Holy Spirit. PHI-413V Christian concept of the imago Dei and worldview essay Knowledge of God, Knowledge of Ethics

A key component of the foundations of Christian spirituality and ethics as described above is the view that people can have genuine knowledge of God and knowledge of right and wrong.

A few observations about the word knowledge need to be considered. First, by knowledge we mean the opposite of mere opinion.

Knowledge is more than just an educated guess; it is being in touch with the real world as it really is. Thus, knowledge in this sense is not merely subjective, but is rather an objective description of reality.

For example, the proposition “the earth is round” is an objectively true description of reality, even if some people happen to subjectively deny that the earth is round. Subjective beliefs may be true or false.

What would make subjective beliefs true would be if they matched the real objective world. Fundamentally, knowledge is the possession and awareness of truth.

There are two philosophies, however, that stand in contrast to the Christian belief that one can have knowledge of God and knowledge of right and wrong, namely scientism and postmodernism.

These two philosophies are very influential in today’s society, although they are not compatible with the Christian worldview.

It is important to understand these philosophies because not only are they not compatible with the Christian worldview, they arguably have negative effects on the practice of medicine and health care.

Scientism Although the term scientism has the word science in it, it is crucial to recognize that (1) scientism is not the same thing as (2) science.

In the Christian worldview, science is a great and good thing.

In fact, the Christian worldview has always encouraged careful investigation of the natural world.

In the Christian worldview, medical technology is considered a good gift from God insofar as God has created the kind of world that has a structure that can be discovered and manipulated to bring about the good of human beings (Rae & Cox, 1999).

Scientism, however, is not compatible with the Christian worldview. Scientism is the belief that the best or only way to have any knowledge of reality is by means of the sciences (Moreland & Craig, 2003, pp. 346-350).

In other words, if something is not known scientifically then it is not known at all, and the only way to hold true beliefs about anything is to know them scientifically.

That may sound reasonable and even commonsense, but there are two problems with scientism: (1) scientism is a self-refuting philosophy, and (2) science has clear limits.

First, if the only way to have true beliefs is through science, then the thesis of scientism itself (“the only way to have any knowledge of the world”) could not be true because it cannot be proven scientifically.

Thus, the thesis of scientism fails its own truth test. Scientism’s thesis is, in fact, a philosophical statement.

Philosophers call such propositions self-refuting because they invalidate themselves by definition, similarly to someone claiming, “I cannot speak a word of English.”

Second, while science is a powerful way of gaining knowledge of the natural world, science is limited and is not the only way of gaining knowledge.

Consider the following two limitations of science (though there are many others); science cannot tell us anything about (1) ethics or (2) how one ought to use the results of science (University of California Museum of Paleontology, n.d.).

Science is wonderful and describes the way things are, but it has no authority to tell us what we ought to do morally.

Science cannot tell me whether or not I ought to love my spouse, keep my promises, or give to the poor.

Even when it comes to ethical issues that involve science, science cannot determine what the right thing to do would be.

For example, science might be able to describe the nasty effects of a terminal disease on a person or explain the state of a person’s brain if that person is in a vegetative state.

However, science cannot determine whether euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide is good, bad, right, or wrong. Science also cannot determine how scientific data and results ought to be used.

Science might enable the discovery of chemical processes or structures, but should the results be used for creating biotechnology to engineer human DNA?

Should the results of scientific research be used to create bioweapons for military purposes? Such questions are beyond the bounds of what science can answer.

Remember scientism is NOT science; it is a philosophical thesis that claims that science is the only methodology to gain knowledge and that every other claim to knowledge is either mere opinion or false.

However, as Nicholas Rescher remarks, “to take this stance [of scientism] is not to celebrate science but to distort it” (as cited in Moreland & Craig, 2003).

Postmodern Relativism

Postmodernism is a broad philosophical position that claims that there is no such thing as truth or an objective reality that can be known.

A common way in which postmodernism is expressed is through a view called relativism. Relativism is the view that there is no such thing as truth in the common sense of that concept.

Every claim about the nature of reality is simply relative to either an individual or a society/culture. Another way to put this is to say that truth is invented by people (whether it is individuals or entire societies) instead of being discovered.

According to this way of thinking, there is not genuine truth to be had or known, only subjective opinions or beliefs. While certain questions are no doubt matters of subjective opinion, such as “what is the best flavor of ice cream?” or “what is the proper way to shake hands?” not all questions are.

This is most clearly seen when we consider moral or ethical propositions about right or wrong. It would be a serious mistake to claim that the propositions “murder is wrong” or “racism is evil” are mere subjective matters of opinion. However, that is what relativism implies.

If all truth including morality is simply a human invention, then there is no standard for genuine truth, and it follows that there is no genuine right or wrong. However, this is certainly false.

Whether or not the Nazi party, made up of thousands of individuals, believed that killing 6 million Jews was a good thing, we have to say without any hesitation that they were genuinely wrong. But it is not possible to be wrong unless there is genuine objective truth to be known.

Both scientism and postmodern relativism are incompatible with the foundations of Christian spirituality and ethics.

The Christian worldview holds science in high regard and accepts it as one of the most powerful communal ways of obtaining knowledge about the world. However, contrary to scientism, the Christian worldview does not accept science as the only way of knowing things about the world.

Secondly, contrary to postmodern relativism, the Christian worldview holds that genuine objective knowledge of God and of right and wrong is possible.

It follows then that who God is and what is right and wrong are not merely matters of subjective opinion, but genuine truths to be discovered.

https://mynursingessaypapers.com

Conclusion The foundations discussed above provide the framework for Christian ways of ethical and spiritual decision-making in health care. It is important to understand therefore that the Christian way of ethical and spiritual decision-making is distinct from other worldviews and is not the same as Buddhist, Muslim, or even atheist ways of ethical and spiritual decision-making.

It is not fair or respectful to paint all religions or worldviews with the same brush under the heading of “spirituality” and ignore the differences. Topic 2 will discuss a foundational principle to the practice of medicine and health care, as well as bioethics namely, the principle of respect for persons.

The Christian worldview goes even further and states all human beings are made in the image of God and therefore have intrinsic value and are worthy of dignity and respect. Topic 3 will discuss the field of bioethics and introduce some of the main methodologies of ethical decision-making in health care.

The focus in this section will be on the methodology called principlism which stresses the application of four moral principles to all ethical decisions in health care. Prinipalism will be used and interpreted in light of the Christian worldview and the overarching narrative presented in the Bible.

Topic 4 will briefly introduce issues of death, dying, and grief. The focus will be on ethical issues at the end of life and the Christian worldview regarding death in light of the biblical narrative and the hope of resurrection inaugurated by the person and work of Jesus Christ. Topic 5 will conclude with discussion about the facilitating of ethical and spiritual decision-making for patients, and the practical application of the principles and tools introduced in this course.

References Cosgrove, M. P. (2006). Foundations of Christian thought: Faith, learning, and the Christian worldview. Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel. Keller, T. (2012). Every good endeavor: Connecting your work to God’s work. New York, NY: Dutton. Moreland, J. P., & Craig, W. L. (2003). Philosophical foundations for a Christian worldview. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic. Puchalski, C., Ferrell, B., Virani, R., Otis-Green, S., Baird, P., Bull, J., … Sulmasy D. (2009). Improving the quality of spiritual care as a dimension of palliative care: The report of the consensus conference. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 12(10), 885-904. Rae, Scott B., & Cox, P. M. (1999). Bioethics: A Christian approach in a pluralistic age. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co. University of California Museum of Paleontology. (n.d.). Science has limits: A few things that science does not do. Retrieved from https://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/0_0_0/whatisscience_12 © 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. PHI-413V Christian concept of the imago Dei and worldview essay

IS IT VERY URGENT? LET OUR TEAM OF EXPERTS HANDLE IT INSTANTLY!⇓

https://mynursingessaypapers.com/2022/07/06/phi-413v-christian-concept-of-the-imago-dei-and-worldview-essay/

‎

#nursing #nursingschool #nursingcollege #university #college #phd #phdjourney #phdblr #pharmacology #phd topics #nursingquestions #nursing student #nursingdissertation #nursingdissertationhelp #nursingcasestudy #nursingannotated #nursingcoursework #essay #PHI

0 notes

mynursingessaypapers · 2 years

Text

PHI-413V-RS-T3T5 Case Study Healing And Autonomy.

“Let us handle this question instantly for you!

In addition to the topic study materials, use the chart you completed and questions you answered in the Topic 3 about \”Case Study: Healing and Autonomy\” as the basis for your responses in this assignment.

Answer the following questions about a patient\’s spiritual needs in light of the Christian worldview.

In 200-250 words, respond to the following: Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James, or would that mean a disrespect of a patient\’s autonomy? Explain your rationale.

In 400-500 words, respond to the following:

How ought the Christian think about sickness and health? How should a Christian think about medical intervention?

What should Mike as a Christian do? How should he reason about trusting God and treating James in relation to what is truly honoring the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence in James\’s care?

In 200-250 words, respond to the following: How would a spiritual needs assessment help the physician assist Mike determine appropriate interventions for James and for his family or others involved in his care?

Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials.

https://mynursingessaypapers.com/

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

BS in Health Sciences 1.2; BS Nursing (RN to BSN ) 5.2

Assess for the spiritual needs and provide appropriate interventions for individuals, families, and groups.

Attachments PHI-413V-RS-T3T5CaseStudyHealingAndAutonomy.docx RUBRIC Attempt Start Date: 13-Sep-2021 at 12:00:00 AM

Due Date: 19-Sep-2021 at 11:59:59 PM Maximum Points: 200.0

ORDER AN A++PAPER HERE!

https://mynursingessaypapers.com/2022/07/21/phi-413v-rs-t3t5-case-study-healing-and-autonomy/

‎

#nursingquestions #nursing #nursingschool #nutrition #nursing student #edaucation #medblr #medicine #nursingdegree #nursing course #nursingcoursework #annotated bibliography #nursingdissertation #nursingcasestudy #college #university #nursingcollege

0 notes

mynursingessaypapers · 2 years

Text

PHI 413V Topic 2 Assignment Moral Status Case Study - Fetal Abnormality

‘’This ‘PHI full course comprises all the questions that we’ve handled before! We can handle yours too!! similarly, we have all the done samples’’

PHI 413V Topic 2 Assignment Moral Status Case Study - Fetal Abnormality

Topic 2 Assignment - Moral Status Case Study - Fetal Abnormality ---------

Case Study: Fetal Abnormality (Moral Status Essay)

Based on “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality\” and other required topic study materials, write a 750-1,000-word reflection that answers the following questions:

What is the Christian view of the nature of human persons, and which theory of moral status is it compatible with?

How is this related to the intrinsic human value and dignity?

Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus?

What from the case study specifically leads you to believe that they hold the theory you selected? Case Study: Fetal Abnormality (Moral Status Essay).

How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendations for action?

What theory do you agree with? Why? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action?

Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials.

BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

This assignment uses a rubric.

Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Case Study: Fetal Abnormality

Jessica is a 30-year-old immigrant from Mexico City.

She and her husband Marco have been in the United States for the last three years and have finally earned enough money to move out of their Aunt Maria’s home and into an apartment of their own.

They are both hard workers. Jessica works 50 hours a week at a local restaurant and Marco has been contracting side jobs in construction.

Six months before their move to an apartment, Jessica finds out she is pregnant.

Four months later, Jessica and Marco arrive at the county hospital, a large, public, nonteaching hospital. A preliminary ultrasound indicates a possible abnormality with the fetus.

Further scans are conducted, and it is determined that the fetus has a rare condition in which it has not developed any arms and will not likely develop them.

There is also a 25% chance that the fetus may have Down syndrome.

Dr. Wilson, the primary attending physician, is seeing Jessica for the first time, since she and Marco did not receive earlier prenatal care over concerns about finances.

Marco insists that Dr. Wilson refrain from telling Jessica the scan results, assuring him that he will tell his wife himself when she is emotionally ready for the news.

While Marco and Dr. Wilson are talking in another room, Aunt Maria walks into the room with a distressed look on her face.

She can tell that something is wrong and inquires of Dr. Wilson. After hearing of the diagnosis, she walks out of the room wailing loudly and praying aloud.

Case Study: Fetal Abnormality (Moral Status Essay).

Marco and Dr. Wilson continue their discussion, and Dr. Wilson insists that he has an obligation to Jessica as his patient and that she has a right to know the diagnosis of the fetus.

He furthermore is intent on discussing all relevant factors and options regarding the next step, including abortion.

Marco insists on taking some time to think of how to break the news to Jessica, but Dr. Wilson, frustrated with the direction of the conversation, informs the husband that such a choice is not his to make.

Dr. Wilson proceeds back across the hall, where he walks in on Aunt Maria awkwardly praying with Jessica and phoning the priest.

At that point, Dr. Wilson gently but briefly informs Jessica of the diagnosis and lays out the option for abortion as a responsible medical alternative, given the quality of life such a child would have. Jessica looks at him and struggles to hold back her tears.

Jessica is torn between her hopes of a better socioeconomic position and increased independence, along with her conviction that all life is sacred.

Marco will support Jessica in whatever decision she makes but is finding it difficult not to view the pregnancy and the prospects of a disabled child as a burden and a barrier to their economic security and plans.

Dr. Wilson lays out all of the options but clearly makes his view known that abortion is “scientifically” and medically a wise choice in this situation.

Aunt Maria pleads with Jessica to follow through with the pregnancy and allow what “God intends” to take place and urges Jessica to think of her responsibility as a mother.

BUY A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

https://mynursingessaypapers.com/2022/07/06/phi-413v-topic-2-assignment

0 notes