Tumgik
#nathan bay
erotica-on-amazon · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
Whatever he wants, he gets. But I never knew that he wanted me. It was supposed to be a two-person road trip, but I should've known something would come along and ruin it. James is my biggest rival and somehow, he's convinced my friend to let him tag along on our vacation. But there's a thin line between love and hate. The longer I spend with James in such close proximity, the more that line seems to be getting blurred.
8 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Blackwell Academy Student Files
109 notes · View notes
everythingcalypso · 7 months
Text
I’m back in my Life is Strange arc ❤️
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
209 notes · View notes
theonlyvalerie · 1 month
Text
Blackwell Academy, a Life is Strange community server!
Hello everyone! I’d like to welcome you all to join the wonderful community of Blackwell Academy! A Life is Strange Discord server made for all Life is Strange fans :)
We’re a new and active community with a focus on fostering a safe and comfortable space for all members of the community. Post artwork, talk about the games, your favorite ships, your headcanons or fan theories — you name it!
We’d love for you to join and help our community grow. We even like to host events such as movie watchalongs, game nights, and more.
We’re also very open to any and all suggestions to help improve your experience with us. We’d love for the server to be as welcoming and enjoyable as possible.
Come join us!
80 notes · View notes
okitsuudd · 2 months
Text
🍽️🍰
Tumblr media Tumblr media
39 notes · View notes
sunshine-gumdrop · 1 month
Text
Pasta has arrived.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Tkachuk is a Calgary pop, but I redraw a "beautifully realistic" panther on him. 🌚
33 notes · View notes
viiiik · 1 year
Text
Queens
Tumblr media
341 notes · View notes
stereax · 7 days
Text
Tumblr media
21 notes · View notes
chloe-caulfield94 · 2 months
Text
Certain things are never justified
One of the reasons I am captivated by the Bae vs Bay dillema is that it perfectly exemplifies the difference between "pure" utilitarianism on one hand and rules-based utilitiarianism as well as deontology on the other.
To put it simply, under "purely" utilitarian ethics, actions are judged solely based on their outcome. Ends justify all means.
Under rules-based utilitarianism, actions are generally judged based on their results, but with some exceptions. Some actions, which violate fundamental values and principles, can never be considered justified, even if they would bring about positive results.
And under deontological ethics, actions are judged based not on their outcomes, but rather based on whether they conform to the moral duties resting on the person performing the action.
Do you see the difference? Under "pure" utilitarianism, ANY action can be justified, as long as it produces the result you deem positive. Doesn't matter how vile the action is, it can be justified, as long as the situation is "exceptional" enough.
Under the latter two approaches, certain actions are so reprehensible, that they can never be justified, no matter what outcome they would produce.
Now, you'd think that murder, that is intentionally causing the death of another human being outiside of the context of self-defence, is something so reprehensible that we'd all agree it's never justified. Unfortunately, the Bae vs Bay dillema, the fact that it even is a dillema, proves that some people are able to rationalize even murder, "for the greater good".
And yes, Max intentionally taking Chloe from the safety she enjoys on Friday and thrusting her back in front of a barrel of a gun on Monday, is murder. Bay Max intentionally, as a result of her conscious decision, causes Chloe to die. She willingly causes Chloe's death, which wouldn't happen otherwise. If Max does nothing on Friday, Chloe lives. It's Chloe's death that requires Max's conscious input. It doesn't matter it's Nathan who's pulling the trigger, the same it doesn't matter it's not you behind the steering wheel if you push someone into traffic.
If Bay Max ever stood trial, her action would be classified as murder - she intentionally caused another person's death with her actions. And no, "destiny" is not a valid defence in criminal court. And no, the fact that Chloe was originally in danger and it was Max who saved her life doesn't matter, because it doesn't make Chloe into Max's property that she can freely dispose of. It matters that on Friday, when the final choice is made, the original danger has already been averted and it requires Max's conscious decision and intentional action to recreate that danger and push Chloe into it. And no, nobody can "okay" their own murder. Especially a depressed, abused teenager.
At best Bay Max could try to claim the defense of necessity, arguing that she committed a criminal act in order to stop great harm from occuring. But that defense involves acknowledging that the act the defendant stands accused of was in fact a crime, but due to the unusual circumstances of the case, the accused should not be punished in this specific instance.
In contrast, if Bae Max ever stood trial, she would be acquitted. Because to be held responsible for something, you need to at least be able to predict the consequences of your actions. Max had no intent to destroy the town, which is why she couldn't be found guilty of murder. She couldn't even be found guilty of manslaughter, because on Monday, when she performed the action which brought about the Storm, it was impossible for her to predict that would be the result. You can't retroactively ascribe Max's state of mind from Friday to her action on Monday. To find someone guilty, the action and intent have to exist simultaneously.
Bae Max wouldn't have to argue necessity or any other specific legal defense. Her action (or rather inaction) was simply lawful, as it didn't contain the necessary elements of any crime on the books. You are never under a legal obligation to take a life. So by refusing to take a life, you cannot possibly commit any crime.
To my chagrin, a lot of people are willing to justify murder. To them, utilitarianism excuses even the intentional taking of another person's life, as long as it produces a result which they consider "a greater good" or at least a "lesser evil".
So I'm going to give a different example, which hopefully will illustrate to everyone that "pure" utilitarianism is a flawed ethical system, leading to monstrous, inhuman conclusions. There's one thing that hopefully nobody would ever try to excuse.
TW: sexual assault
Let's consider a hypothetical scenario, in which the terrible crime Max saves Chloe from on Monday is not murder, but rape. It's not a far-fetched scenario, since the "photo sessions" Jefferson and Nathan subjected their unwilling models to were a form of sexual assault. Given Jefferson's ramblings about "taking away the innocence and corrupting" the teenage girls he abducted and how both him and Nathan kept calling their victims "whores" and "sluts", the repulsive sexual undertone of their violence is clear. And who knows what Nathan would've done to Chloe had she not mustered the last bits of her strength to flee from his dorm room?
So in this different scenario, Max has the option to push Chloe from the safety she enjoys on Friday back into danger on Monday. But not to be murdered. To be raped.
I beg of you, please tell me you wouldn't still choose the Bay in that different scenario. Please tell me you at least find rape to be so evil of an act that you would always prevent it, without even considering the results from a utilitarian perspective. Please tell me you would never let someone be raped, not even to stop a tornado with multiple fatalities.
So if we agree that there's at least one act so vile that it can never be justified, no matter how "exceptional" the situation might be, no matter what the consequences of preventing that act might be, don't you think that murder should also be considered an unjustifiable action? It's not appropriate or even possible to compare different types of atrocities, but you could make an arguement that a victim of rape at least has a chance to overcome their trauma and continue their life. A victim of murder has no such chance.
Why is the clash of "pure" utilitarianism with rules-based utilitarianism and deontology so important? I apologize, I know I'm going to fulfil Godwin's law, but I think it's warranted this time.
Some SS and NKVD members were simply sadists, relishing at the opportunity to murder and torment others with impunity. But some were people who bought into the deplorable, false narrative that in exceptional circumstances, like war or revolution, great sacrifices simply had to be made. That some people, whose continued existence was a threat to the nation, had to be removed. Regrettably, they had to be killed. But their murder was justified, as it would produce a greater good for the rest of society.
If you're a "pure" utilitarian, you can be persuaded to commit any atrocity imaginable. If you are willing to intentionally take a human life outside of the context of self-defence, then under right circumstances - war, revolution or some other calamity - you could do anything, as long as a persuasive arguement is made that it's "a lesser evil" or that it will lead to "a greater good" or that it simply "has to be done".
But if you acknowledge that there are some actions, like murder, which are never justified, then you remain immune to such arguements. No matter the circumstances, you would never commit certain acts of evil. You have at least some basic red lines. And that makes you a moral person.
36 notes · View notes
jackhghes · 1 year
Text
NHL Recommendations
Fic recommendations that you guys should definitely check out.
Tumblr media
(series) Road Wife - by @cellythefloshie 18+ (series) Unresistable ;; jack hughes - by @luvmmarner (one-shot) Fan Girl ;; michael bunting - by @luvmmarner (one shot) you were right ;; jack hughes - by @luvzegras (one shot) baby, baby ;; quinn hughes - by @luvhughes43 (one-shot) keep your glasses on ;; owen power - by @powermakar
(one-shot) roughed up ;; sidney crosby - by @drewsbuzzcut 18+
(one-shot) illicit affairs ;; sidney crosby - by @blueskrugs
(one-shot) Along for The Ride ;; auston matthews - by @woah-were-halfway-there
(series) Impact ;; mitch marner - by @callsign-denmark
(one-shot) Take Five ;; mitch marner - by @mattybenierss
(one-shot) I miss you like the very first night ;; cale makar - by @mattyanonwrites
(one-shot) you always did feel just like home - nathan mackinnon - by @wyattjohnston
185 notes · View notes
sitting-on-me-bum · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
Reddish Egret
Location: San Carlos Bay – Bunche Beach Preserve, Fort Myers, Florida, USA
by Nathan Arnold
Audubon Photography Awards
35 notes · View notes
erotica-on-amazon · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media
College is a time for new experiences, or at least that's what I thought. I arrived on campus with the expectation of chasing girls and hitting up frat parties. Instead, I found myself in a battle of wits with my dormmate, Brayden, who was harboring a big secret. I had every reason to believe Brayden, like me, was into girls. But as time passed, I started to question my assumptions.
Brayden's nonchalant attitude about flaunting his body made me wonder if he might be subliminally teasing or enticing me. Strangely enough, it was starting to work. Even though I was certain of my own straightness, I couldn't help but think about my reckless and cute dormmate more and more.
As if things weren't risky enough, I walked in on him doing something I couldn't have imagined in my wildest dreams. What shocked me even more was that he was using a toy that left no room for doubt about his orientation. There was no more denying that Brayden was into guys, and I was right on his radar.
And once he knew I'd been stealing glances at him, Brayden had no intention of letting me off easily. Lucky for him, I was happy to return the favor. Frustrated and lustful, I was ready to discipline Brayden for his mind games, even if it meant taking him hard until the walls of our dorm room rattled.
8 notes · View notes
trulyatessfan · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Nadia Ben Yamin for @vaudevillianic
Nathan Pandit for @pathogenflock
Amy Young for someone on Discord
Carmen Martinez for someone on Instagram
OC for @alexlesuagz
36 notes · View notes
aureliewood · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
It's our little baby, it's Nathan Prescott ! I wish i can play Life Is Strange like the first time again 😢
This action will have consequences 🦋
36 notes · View notes
onenakedfarmer · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
Daily Painting
Nathan Oliveira SEATED MAN WITH A DOG (1957)
24 notes · View notes
p41nkillers · 7 months
Text
im here still waiting for nathans redemption arc where he apologizes to everyone especially kate for fucked her shit up so we all could see him growing into a good person and learn from his past ao3 pls do ur work and magic
31 notes · View notes