Hey everyone!!
I’ll be Taking a Mental health Break Off of the internet on June 19th.
Why?
My mental health has been bad recently, reeaaally bad. Being on my devices a lot has been a main cause of it. I feel like taking a break for a while will do me good and actually help me get my shit together.
Are you leaving?
No, of course not! This is just a short hiatus. I’m not leaving tumblr anytime soon, I’ll definitely be back soon!
Can I still interact with you?
Of course you can, However if you try to after the date I’ve Specified, I’ll probably not respond until I come back. Anytime before that I’ll probably respond!! Just because I’m taking a break doesn’t mean I won’t see any of your messages eventually. 💥
When will you be back?
As of now, I don’t have a specific date. But most likely a few weeks to about a month. So not long!
You can always continue to view my blog, tag me in things, send me asks, etc. just please don’t expect an instant response !! Thank you all for your support on all my socials, including this one. ❤️
17 notes
·
View notes
✦☆ Read Me Info ☆✦
🤠🏳🌈 Howdy! I go by Bonnie or Benji (he/they pronouns.) My main account is @red-dead-simp 🏳🌈🤠
I don't draw often anymore because of physical and mental health, and I've sort of lost the ability to do so to be honest. But when I do, and when it's not NSFW, I'll try to remember to post it here :) This blog is SFW, but content may have adult themes. Young'ns, heed that warning.
This is a safe space for anyone 2SLGBTQ+, autistic, disabled, and/or BIPOC. I won't tolerate anything otherwise.
Read below the cut for additional information and TWs for themes that may come up!
All NSFW art goes on my Twitter, which is explicitly 🔞18+ and all under 18s will be blocked. It's nothing personal, I just post and retweet NSFW content freely, and it's no place for minors.
***
Trigger/Content Warnings:
-- Please note that these are never written or portrayed in a way that glorifies these topics or actions, and most of this applies to character background stories or written works--
Fictional drug use and alcoholism
Fictional violence
Allusions to and mentions of abuse and domestic violence (physical, emotional, and psychological)
Use of era-specific homophobic slurs (in fanfics I may link)
Characters acting ableist or making ableist jokes at the expense of disabled/autistic characters (in fanfics I may link)
There may be mildly suggestive art, specifically of my OC Shoe lol Think shirtless pics. I'll tag these as such.
Fandom List:
Rather, fandoms that are relevant to what I'll probably post here.
Bully (2006)
Red Dead Redemption
World of Warcraft
Bully OCs:
Hyperlinks direct you to the Bully Fanon Wiki page for each OC :) Please note the above T/CWs.
Randy Douglas
Bentley You
Hannah Cox
Mitzi Patricelli
Duke Symell
Charlie Wright
Leo Kingsland Cox
The Third Floor Ghost
Red Dead OCs:
You can find these guys and more on my Instagram! Hyperlinks direct you to relevant posts.
Gwenieve O'Gwilly
Eleanor (she actually belongs to my bestie, but I use her a lot, especially with Gwen)
Clover Haywood (she actually belongs to my sister but I use her from time to time lol)
Scarlett O'Shea
Shoe Percutio
Benny
Other OCs:
No link to these guys, but I'll tag them with their names (mostly for ease of access for myself XD)
Shoe (not in the Cowboy AU of RDO)
Zerus (a WoW OC)
Morty
Guy
Big C.
Lucas
Skadi (she belongs to my sister, but I draw her from time to time)
3 notes
·
View notes
people can use this site however they want but there's something almost- idk, sad? about how few people are actually using their blogs. you can turn themes on and have skeletons dancing in the background. you can make everything hot pink. your blog is your scrapbook and you can put whatever you want in there. tags are okay at organizing things so you can have just a whole archive of cool shit to look at later. i know people complain a lot about people liking stuff about reblogging for engagement, and on one hand i get that- it is WILD to see a drawing i spent hours on get only 12 reblogs and 60 likes. Absolute culture shock compared to my previous fandoms. but i don't think you should reblog anything to make artists happy. i think you should reblog things so you can find them again. i think you should queue things to appear on the dash at specific times on certain days. i think you should reblog things so when you're talking to your friends about xyz post you saw you can look in your blog's archive and find it again. i think you should reblog things so that your dash is filled with one really sleepy cat. with the loss of reblogs there's the loss of engagement, which Does hurt the community-focus that makes tumblr so appealing, but idk i just wish people were more excited about the incredible amount of customization that tumblr allows and took advantage of that more
22 notes
·
View notes
terfs when a study shows literally anything positive about trans people/transitioning: 'hm i think this requires some fact-checking. Were those researchers REALLY unbiased? Because if they were biased this doesn't count and if they weren't knowingly biased they probably were unconsciously biased, woke media affects so much these days. Have there been any other studies on this? Because if there haven't been this could be an outlier and if there have been and they all agree that's a bit odd, why aren't there any outliers, and if there have been and any disagree we really won't know the truth until we very thoroughly analyze them all, will we? Were there enough subjects for a good sample size? Did every single subject involved stay involved through the whole study because if they didn't we should be sure nothing shady was going on resulting in people dropping out. Are we 110% sure all the subjects were fully honest and at no point were embarrassed or afraid to admit they didn't love transitioning to the people in charge of their transition? Are we 110% sure none of the subjects were manipulated into thinking they were happy with their transition? In fact we should double-check what they think with their parents, because if the subjects and their parents disagree it's probably because they've been manipulated but their cis parents have not and are very unbiased. How many autistic subjects were there because if there weren't enough then this doesn't really study the overlap between autistic and trans and if there were too many then we just don't know enough about what causes that overlap to be sure this study really explains being trans and isn't just about being autistic. How many AFAB subjects were there because if there weren't enough this is just another example of prioritizing AMAB people and ignoring the different struggles of girls and women and if there were too many how do we know sexism didn't affect the results. Was the study double-blinded? We all know double-blinded is the most reliable so if this one wasn't that's a point against it even if the thesis literally physically could not be double-blinded. Look i'm not being transphobic, i want what's best for trans people! Really! But as a person who is not trans and therefore objective in a way they cannot possibly be, i just think we should only take into account Good Science here. You want to be following science and not being manipulated or experimented upon by something unscientific, right?'
terfs when they see a study of 45 subjects so old it predates modern criteria for gender dysphoria and basically uses 'idk her parents think she's too butch', run by a guy who practiced conversion therapy, 'confirmed' by a guy who treated the significant portion of subjects who didn't follow up as all desisting, definitely in the category of 'physically cannot double-blind this', completely contradicted by multiple other studies done on actual transgender subjects, but can be kinda cited as evidence against transitioning if you ignore everything else about it: 'oOOH SEE THIS IS WHAT WE'RE TALKIN BOUT. SCIENCE. Just good ol' unbiased thorough analysis. I see absolutely no reason to dig any deeper on this and if you think it's wrong you're the one being unscientific. It's really a shame you've been so thoroughly brainwashed by the trans agenda and can't even accept science when you see it. Maybe now that someone has finally uncovered this long-lost study from 1985, we can make some actual progress on the whole trans problem.'
5 notes
·
View notes
oooohhh I found some blogs that need ~reporting~
Of course that crowd would have a bunch of people with 88 in their username. Of course they fucking would.
(For context: I enjoy “cleaning” the internet. I’ll sometimes go through tags where fascists, bigots, child predators, etc. are known to dwell. I look for dogwhistles; and if I find dogwhistles, I go deep into the blog to make sure it’s actually what I think it is. I’ll usually find one bad blog, then go into who liked their posts, which usually uncovers a bunch of others. I block all of them so I have their usernames saved in my blocklist, then, one-by-one, I report them in detail for whatever evil shit they’re doing.)
(Don’t worry; I’d never go after someone for writing fiction. Look at my blog for Christ’s sake.)
2 notes
·
View notes
just saw a post saying people who dont like bi-lesbians uphold the "gold star lesbian" ideas and such.
no. i just dont want my men-exluding identity to include men
like im no "gold star lesbian" by any means, and i couldnt give two fucking shits if a lesbian has dated, kissed, or yes, even fucked a guy before
because thats usually during the stage of figuring out your identity, or active suppression to hide it from others or deny it from yourself
for the love of every fucking thing you hold dear, stop using outdated terminology to force men into lesbian spaces
we made up new words for a fucking reason (especially in the Queer community, thats what the MOGAI movement was about), so that people had words to describe things, like themselves
and if you're going to take "lesbian" from non-men who dont like men, then do us the courtesy of telling us what you think i should call myself. because im genuinely so curious
also if every identity is all-inclusive whats the point of calling yourself anything? lesbian, bisexual, bi-lesbian, or whatever. if everyone needs to have a sexuality that includes all genders then why not just, abolish labels for sexualities? thatd solve the problem real quick
3 notes
·
View notes