It’s easier to hide from the mirror, than admit what you see in it.
@soulinkpoetry
.
13 notes
·
View notes
I want to believe this is pr and please forgive me for swaying but I can see this as pr or real, but either way its just a hot mess.
So things aren’t always as they appear can be applied to both.
I guess I’m just frustrated with Chris and his family for aiding this mess.
Like his mom is liking her pics, her ring is gold and does match Chris’
Ugh at the same time I’m like…..hmmm it was so quiet and now right on schedule he we go with the bullshit.
Like Chris needs to speak louder with the breadcrumbs if this is fake. I’m tired and about to fully walk away. It’s frustrating watching this mess.
Sorry for venting. 😞
No, An🫶n... It's fine... Vent all you want. This is a safe space.
And if I'm being honest, there are times where I sway too. I don't know, it's hard sometimes. Especially since, I have a feeling this won't end when the year does. But then Chris does something, like unfollow everyone including Albitch, and you gotta think, about what he's trying to say.
Is he saying that he has cut ties with her? Does this mean it's over? Is this finally going to be blown wide open? Is he okay? WTF is Albitch doing throwing her tantrums? JOSH PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD PLEASE HELP CHRIS!!!
It's a lot. And his family certainly isn't helping. They contributed to the baiting, except for a few times where they "slipped". And from my pov the only innocents here are Dodger and the kids(Chris' nieces and nephews). Everyone else is a 50/50. And all of this makes me wish and long for the times when he was okay, and free.
God, I hope this ends soon. Because no amount of Dodger content will ever make me accept that Chris isn't who he said it was. So, don't worry about it, dear An🫶n. You're not the only one having doubts.
6 notes
·
View notes
I'm going to go ahead and VOMIT as much as of this story idea out of my head as possible because if I don't it's gonna rattle in my head forever and ever and I'm not gonna be able to rest easy.
ANYWAY, remember the Valiant Hero ending... wait don't touch that dial! OK, so I always go on and on about my Charles is an android AU, but what about this? Charles barely survives the explosion, his body is pretty badly damaged, but what isn't damage is easily repairs. He ends up spending one whole week repairing himself with wrecked parts that have somehow made their way to the moon...
AND SO for like one and a half months, after trying to repair a very OBVIOUSLY broken transmission device, he uses it as a video journal to collect his thoughts and hopefully leave it as a memoriam for him in case no one EVER finds him and he just ends up completely and utterly dying.
BUT SURPRISE! He's not alone! Amelia is there! And literally pissed off because wow, you don't remember me, wtf the fuck? She just as badly damaged as he is, but he ends up helping her repair herself because she didn't do such a good job. A for about a week or so, there's a sort of awkward and malicious air around them until Amelia finds out that Charles is the one who wrecked the Toppat Space Station. SURPRISE! She's pissed off because HALF OF HER FAMILY was killed in that explosion and she's like "here's a line in the floor if you cross it, I'm going to kill you."
One mental breakdown later though, they're best friends! And they start to work together to hopefully get a proper rocket up in the air so they can possibly go home and see their friends and family members when they run into ANOTHER GUY who was abandoned on the moon. He was actually a CCC test subject/intern that very unfortunately got caught in a horrible accident that left the crew that was taking care of him dead. He was helping with a CCC project on the moon, but I'm not going into details about here, all that matter is they HAVE A NEW FRIEND!
And also Jaques is there because his painting is magic and managed to reassemble itself after the crash and the CCC intern is actually magic too and manages to "half break" the seal on Jaques' painting, so he can move around, it's just his torso and stuff.
And they all work together to try to get off the moon and back home and shenanigans ensue and such and there's a lot of heartwarming junk.
Yeah...
13 notes
·
View notes
honesty corner gojo would send the occasional "u up?" text and you know who falls for it every single time? geto. geto in his little post-pizza-delivery fog.
24 notes
·
View notes
Singer's case for a level of moral equality between humans and non-humans, rather than a mere moral considerability, draws directly on our ways of thinking about moral equality between humans. Our acceptance of the latter does not depend on humans having exactly the same physiological characteristics, abilities, or level of intelligence. If that were the case, humans would simply not enjoy moral equality with one another. Clever and slow-witted people would not count as highly as the other. Yet, our presupposition [*] is that they do. The former are not given priority access to organs for transplant, and the latter are not prevented from casting the single vote that each of us is entitled to. To uphold moral, and indeed political, equality among humans, we need to abandon any appeal to identical talents, skills, wisdom or insight. We need to abandon even the appeal to the possession of a special kind of rationality which humans simply do not all have to the same extent.
But once we suspend the idea that moral equality among humans can be underpinned by appeal to some uniform feature, there will be no reason to restrict the scope of equality to humans alone. Indeed, doing so could only involve an appeal to the one thing that all humans do share, i.e. our humanity. And any appeal to this, for Singer, seems perilously close to a form of prejudice, a bias which is based on the ethically irrelevant characteristic of belonging to my group.
-- Tony Milligan, Animal Ethics
Every social justice movement holds this equality of moral considerability as its central premise. You can't deny one without denying them all. Veganism is essential to intersectional leftism.
* I disagree that this is a presupposition. PhilTube explains Simplican better than I can.
10 notes
·
View notes