Tumgik
#try living as a Christian in Saudi Arabia
autismserenity · 2 months
Text
Someone on Reddit made the mistake of saying, "Teach me how this conflict came about" where I could see it.
Let me teach you too.
The common perception is that Jews came out of nowhere, stole Palestinian homes and kicked Palestinians out of them, and then bombed them for 75 years, until they finally rebelled in the form of Hamas invading Israel and massacring 22 towns in one day.
The historical reality is that Jews have lived there continuously for at least 3500 years.
There are areas, like Meggido iirc, with archeological evidence of continuous habitation for 7,000 years, but Jewish culture as we recognize it today didn't develop until probably halfway through that.
Ethnic Jews are the indigenous people of this area.
Indigeneity means a group was originally there, before any colonization happened, and that it has retained a cultural connection to the land. History plus culture.
That's what Jews have: even when the diaspora became larger than the number of Jews in Israel, the yearning to return to that homeland was a daily part of Jewish prayer and ritual.
The Jewish community in Israel was crushed pretty violently by the Roman Empire in 135 CE, but it was still substantial, sometimes even the majority population there, for almost a thousand years.
The 600s CE brought the advent of Islam and the Arab Empire, expanding out from Saudi Arabia into Israel and beyond. It was largely a region where Jews were second-class citizens. But it was still WAY better than the way Christian Europe treated Jews.
From the 700s-900s, the area saw repeated civil wars, plagues, and earthquakes.
Then the Crusades came, with waves of Christians making "pilgrimages to the Holy Land" and trying to conquer it from Muslims and Jews, who they slaughtered and enslaved.
Israel became pretty well depopulated after all that. It was a very rough time to live there. (And for the curious, I'm calling it Israel because that's what it had been for centuries, until the Romans erased the name and the country.)
By the 1800s, the TOTAL population of what's now Israel and Palestine had varied from 150,000 - 275,000 for centuries. It was very rural, very sparsely populated, on top of being mostly desert.
In the 1880s, Jews started buying land and moving back to their indigenous homeland. As tends to happen, immigration brought new projects and opportunities, which led to more immigration - not only from Jews, but from the Arab world as well.
Unfortunately, there was an antisemitic minority spearheaded by Amin al-Husseini. Who was very well-connected, rich, and from a politically powerful family.
Al-Husseini had enthusiastically participated in the Armenian Genocide under the Ottoman Empire. Then the Empire fell in World War One, and the League of Nations had to figure out what to do with its land.
Mostly, if an area was essentially operating as a country (e.g. Turkey), the League of Nations let it be one. In areas that weren't ready for self-rule, it appointed France or Britain to help them get there.
In recognition of the increased Jewish population in their traditional, indigenous homeland, it declared that that homeland would again become Israel.
As in, the region was casually called Palestine because that was the lay term for "the Holy Land." It had not been a country since Israel was stamped out; only a region of a series of different empires. And the Mandate For Palestine said it was establishing "a national home of the Jewish people" there, in recognition of "the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country."
Britain was appointed to help the Arab and Jewish communities there develop systems of self-government, and then to work together to govern the region overall.
At least, that was the plan.
Al-Husseini, who was deeply antisemitic, did not like this plan.
And, extra-unfortunately, the British response to al-Husseini inciting violent anti-Jewish riots was to put him in a leadership role over Arab Palestine.
They thought it would calm him down and perhaps satisfy him.
They were very wrong.
He went on to become a huge Hitler fanboy, and then a Nazi war criminal. He co-created the Muslim Brotherhood - which Hamas is part of - with fellow fascist fanboy Hassan al-Banna.
He got Nazi Party funding for armed Muslim Brotherhood militias to attack Jews and the Brits in the late 30s, convincing Britain to agree to limit Jewish immigration at the time when it was most desperately needed.
He started using the militias again in 1947, when the United Nations voted to divide the mandated land into a Jewish homeland and a Palestinian one.
Al-Husseini wouldn't stand for a two-state solution. He was determined to tolerate no more than the subdued, small Jewish minority of second-class citizens that he remembered from his childhood.
As armed militias increasingly ran riot, the Arab middle and upper classes increasingly left. About 100,000 left the country before May 1948, when Britain was to pull out, leaving Israel and Palestine to declare their independence.
The surrounding nations didn't want war. They largely accepted the two-state solution.
But al-Husseini lobbied HARD. And by mobilizing the Muslim Brotherhood to provide "destabilizing mass demonstrations and a murderous campaign of intimidation," he got the Arab League nations to agree to invade, en masse, as soon as Britain left.
About 600,000 Arabs fled to those countries during the ensuing war.
Jews couldn't seek refuge there; in fact, most of those countries either exiled their Jews directly, confiscating their property first, or else made Jewish life unlivable and exploited them for underpaid or slave labor for years first.
By the time the smoke cleared and a peace treaty was signed, most of the Arab Palestinian community had fled; there was no Arab Palestinian leadership; many of the refugees' homes and businesses had left had been destroyed in the war; and Israel had been flooded with nearly a million refugees from the Arab League countries and the Holocaust - even more people than had fled the war.
That was the Nakba. The one that gets portrayed as "750,000 Palestinians fled or were expelled!" in the hope that you'll assume they were expelled en masse, their beautiful intact homes all stolen.
Egypt had taken what's now the Gaza Strip in that war, and Jordan took what's now the West Bank - expelling or killing all the Jews in it first.
(Ironically, Jordan was originally supposed to be part of Israel. Britain, inexplicably, cut off what would have been 75% of its land to create Jordan.
Tumblr media
Even more inexplicably, nobody ever talks about it. I've never seen anyone complain that Jordan was stolen from Palestinians. Possibly because Jordan is also the only country that gave Palestinian refugees full citizenship, and it's about half Palestinian now.
Israel is nearly 25% Arab Palestinians with full citizenship and equal rights, so it's not all that different -- but the fundamental difference of living in a country where the majority is Jewish, not Muslim, probably runs pretty deep.)
Anyway: that's why Palestine is Gaza and the West Bank, rather than being some contiguous chunk of land. Or being the land set aside by the U.N. in 1947.
Because Arab countries took that land in 1948, and treated them as essentially separate for 20 years.
Israel got them back, along with the Golan Heights and the Sinai Peninsula, in the next war: 1967, when Egypt committed an act of war by taking control of the waterways and barring Israel from them. It gave the Sinai back to Egypt as part of the 1979 peace accords between Egypt and Israel.
Israel tried to give back the Gaza Strip at the same time. Egypt refused.
Palestine finally declared independence in 1988.
But Hamas formed at about the same time. Probably in response, in fact. Hamas is fundamentally opposed to peace negotiations with Israel.
Again: Hamas is part of a group founded by Nazis.
Hamas has its own charter. It explains that Jews are "the enemy," because they control the drug trade, have been behind every major war, control the media, control the United Nations, etc. Basic Nazi rhetoric.
It has gotten adept at masking that rhetoric for the West. But to friendlier audiences, its leaders have consistently said things like, "People of Jerusalem, we want you to cut off the heads of the Jews with knives. With your hand, cut their artery from here. A knife costs five shekels.  Buy a knife, sharpen it, put it there, and just cut off [their heads]. It costs just five shekels."
(Palestinians were outraged by this speech. Palestinians, by and large, absolutely loathe Hamas.
It's just that it's not the same to say that to locals, as it is to say it where major global powers who oppose this crap can hear you.)
Hamas has stated from the beginning that its mission is to violently destroy Israel and take over the land.
It has received $100M in military funding annually, from Iran, for several years. Because Iran has been building a network of fascist, antisemitic groups across the Middle East, in a blatant attempt to control more and more of it: Hezbollah in Lebanon. The Houthis in Yemen.
Iran has been run by a very far-right, deeply antisemitic dictatorship for decades now, which pretty openly wants to take down both Israel and the U.S.
Last year, Iran increased Hamas's funding to $350M.
The "proof of concept" invasion of Israel that Hamas pulled off on October 7th more than justifies a much bigger investment.
Hamas has publicly stated its intention to attack "again and again and again," until Israel has been violently destroyed.
That is how this conflict came about.
A Nazi group seized power in Gaza in 2007 by violently kicking the Palestinian government out, and began running it as a dictatorship, using it to build money and power in preparations for exactly this.
And people find it shockingly easy to believe its own hype about being "the Palestinian resistance."
As well as its propaganda that Israel is not actually targeting Hamas: it's just using a literal Nazi invasion and massacre as an excuse to randomly commit genocide of the fraction of Palestine it physically left 20 years ago.
Despite the fact that Palestinians in Gaza have been protesting HAMAS throughout the war.
Tumblr media
815 notes · View notes
callimara · 7 months
Text
Important PSA
Criticizing Israel is NOT antisemetism or an attack on Jewish people because
ISRAEL =/= ALL JEWS
And while I am not saying that there is no antisemitism because there is plenty of that too, this is not a case of that. But grouping all Jews together as Israeli and presenting them as a monolith erases their individuality and identity. It's like calling all Asian people Chinese, and that if you criticize China, then you hate all Asian people. It doesn't make sense.
I am so frustrated seeing people who are trying to raise awareness about Palestine be called antisemetic and disgusting by people who cannot perceive Jews and Muslims as anything but a monolith. That's the reason why so many people are having trouble distinguishing between Hamas and Palestinian civilians, because to them, they're all the same.
And that's why they don't see an issue with collective punishment.
And you know what? Palestine is NOT just the Jewish holy land. It is also the Christian holy land, and the Muslim holy land. Palestine wasn't even the first choice for a Jewish homeland because it was heavily contested by Jewish rabbis at the time.
Turning Palestine (I say Palestine because the entirety of what is now Israel used to be Palestine) as an exclusively Jewish ethno-state means that people of Christian and Muslim faith all over the world are stripped of their holy land. The oldest church in the world, dating back to the times of Christ is located in Gaza, and who are the ones protecting it? Palestinians.
And you know who bombed it? Even though it had 500 refugees of both Muslim and Christian faith inside? Israel.
Even the slogan used for the founding of Israel itself, "A land without people for a people without a land." Is blatantly revisionist and erases the existence of Palestinians already living there. It erases all the historic religious sites that stand there and are frequented regularly by their respective devotees. Or worse, does not consider the Palestinians as 'people.'
Some people tend to forget that religious belief is NOT the same as race, and so you CANNOT claim indigeneity just because you are a certain religion. I am an Indonesian Muslim. Born Muslim, raised Muslim, and every generation of my family have been Muslim. That doesn't mean I can say I'm indigenous to Saudi Arabia. Let alone that Saudi Arabian land is my birthright.
If a white American woman born and raised in Seattle decides to convert to Hinduism, can she then say she is now indigenous to India? Or if she has a child, and that child had a child, and they were all raised as a Hindu, but have always lived in the US all their lives, can they claim that they are indigenous to India?
No.
And the fact is, the first Jewish settlers during The First Aliyah (great Jewish migration to Palestine) came from Eastern Europe and are genetically closer to Russians and other Slavs than they are to the Jews who remained in the Middle Eastern region after their exile (and I guess some people forget that you can convert into Judaism even if you didn't come from "The Promised Land." Like for marriages and stuff.) That's why they feel the need to distinguish themselves from the word "Arab."
Granted, there were also Yemeni Jews that migrated with them (whom I would say have stronger claims to indigeneity), but even in the transition camps, there was a clear divide between the European Ashkenazi Jews and the Yemeni Jews, who literally had their kids taken from them to give to the Ashkenazi Jews.
And let's not forget that when Jewish migrants from Ethiopia came, they were given contraceptives without consent to make sure they didn't impact the "desired" population.
Wake up. This isn't a religious war. This is European colonization.
341 notes · View notes
canichangemyblogname · 7 months
Text
I’ve been telling people that Israel— and the Zionist movement as a whole— is actually a security threat to the whole of Southwest Asia *and* to Jewish People globally.
The moderate conservatives and fascists who control the US government keep saying that Israel is vital to western geopolitical interests in the region. But those interests are *not* “security” interests. The interest isn’t preventing war in Southwest Asia or North Africa, especially not when historically colonial leaders (US, UK, and France) are involved. Like… Israel has often been a roadblock in diplomatic deescalation with Iran and counterterrorism in the region (see: Bibi funding terrorists, for one).
I’ve been saying that Israel’s violence is going to spill over to the region. I’ve been warning that Zionist expansion and aggression is going to meet fierce resistance. I’ve been trying to explain that Zionist aggression and expansion is dangerous not just to the Arab people of Southwest Asia, but also Jewish people in Israel and the SWANA region. At some point, Israel will meet too much resistance. At some point, there will be too many fronts and not enough resources.
This violence going to continue to widen in the region and diplomacy will continue to deteriorate. Hezbollah and Houthi activity are only the beginning. Jordan withdrawing their ambassador, the deterioration of normalization with Saudi Arabia, the complete cessation of relations with Brazil, etc… are only the beginning.
But America’s support is likely to remain unwavering, and as long as America has the international power it does, that means little is likely to change. As long as Israel has American support, there will be violence in Southwest Asia.
What a lot of the “I stand with Israel” promoters don’t understand is that the only way to secure the long-term safety and wellbeing of Israeli Jews, and the only way to achieve security and longevity for whatever state they live in, is to provide full and equal rights to Palestinians. That includes their full participation and representation in political systems, full land rights and protections, full economic freedoms, full citizenship, and the right of return.
Zionism has led to nothing but Jewish and Arab death. And the thing is? When the concept was first created in the early 1800s, long before it became a term Israelis attached to Jewish Nationalism, that was its point. People supported this concept as a solution to their country’s “Jewish Question.” They saw it as an opportunity to get Jewish people out of their country. And many Christian groups have come to support the concept believing that all Jews must return to the holy land to be massacred so Jesus can return. They want death. Death is the literal point of Zionist support and movements in countries like the US, UK and France. Christian Zionists want war while Secular Zionists just want to get rid of Jewish people, and don’t give a shit if they die.
There are more Christian Zionists in the US than there are Jewish people in the US. There are more non-Jewish Zionists in the US than there are Jewish people in the whole world. Jewish people make up a fraction of Zionists, and that is because many Jewish people recognize the antisemitic origins of the concept and the danger of ethnic and religious nationalism.
Anti-Zionists recognize that Jewish Nationalism is being used for US and UK colonial interests. Zionism justifies putting Jewish people in harm’s way and the line of fire for US economic interests in Southwest Asia, and calls it “necessary” for Jewish freedom and security. Zionism as well as terrorism is the reason over 1400 Israelis died on Oct. 7th.
Israel ignoring Egypt's warnings, Israel's chaotic "recovery" (a.k.a. their explicit non-recovery and bombing of hostages), and the IOF's chaotic engagement with Hamas fighters on Oct. 7th and 8th that caught hostages and civilians in crossfire should be proof enough that Israel cannot and will consistently fail to provide for the security and welfare of Jewish people. It should also be proof enough that Netanyahu's government doesn't give a shit about Israeli lives unless they can be weaponized to serve his political and regional goals.
From “Zionism encourages and spreads antisemitism around the globe.”
9 notes · View notes
warningsine · 7 months
Text
Satrapi: "[T]he world is very fearful, because we don't know who the enemy is. The world is at war, but at war against who? Bin Laden turns into Saddam and Saddam turns into someone else. They all the time talk about security. Security, security, security. But when you talk about security, then everything is about being safe. And being safe also means having less freedom.
"It makes a society much more conservative, looking for security. If you have freedom, then you have more risks. It goes together…My grandmother always said the saddest life is to be born a cow and to die a donkey. That means you are born stupid, and you're going to die even more stupid…What is the interest of life if you're always scared…? What is the point in living? Just eating and shitting and making money?"
Goldberg: Some conservatives here think that secular young Iranians would be happy if America would come and liberate them. What would you say to them?
Satrapi: "Democracy, contrary to what they try to tell us, it's not a paper that you hang on the wall and then you have a democracy…
"...They [America] talk about the human rights in Iran…[H]ow is it that the United States makes the biggest deals with China, and China is far from respecting human rights? What about Saudi Arabia? If you want to talk about an inquisition, the Iranian regime is far from being an inquisition. We have almost a free press, people leave, women have the right to study, they drive, they work. Saudi Arabia, they don't have anything like that! Talk about human rights in Saudi Arabia! Why doesn't anyone go and put a bomb in Saudi Arabia and kill the king?
"…[W]hen the Iranians wanted to become democratic in 1953 with [Mohammad] Mosaddeq and to nationalize our oil, the CIA came and made a coup d'état in my country. Why do you want me to believe that they want to come and make a democracy? We have to make our democracy!
"…For the people who think that America will come and liberate them, I invite them to read the history and see what America has done. I'm not talking about American people...I love going to the United States...I've been for several book tours; I've come for vacation with my husband. For me it's an amazing country. I love the enthusiasm of Americans…I love the pop art, I love the American cinema, there are so many things that I love about America! I love Coca-Cola, you know?
"My criticism is not towards America -- it's towards the American government, which to me are two different things. The America that I know is not represented by George W. Bush."
Goldberg: Do you see similarities between the Christian fundamentalists in our government and the mullahs in Iran? Satrapi: "They're the same! George Bush and the mullahs of Iran, they use the same words! The mullahs of Iran say we have God on our side; he has God on his side, too. Both of them are convinced that they are going to eradicate evil in the world. But when these words come out of the mouth of a mullah, it's normal. It's a shame that the president of the biggest secular democracy in the world talks with the same words as the mullahs. It's extremely scary."
3 notes · View notes
giftofshewbread · 10 months
Text
Why?
Published on: August 12, 2023 by  :Daymond Duck
On Aug. 2, 2023, Anne Graham Lotz (daughter of Billy Graham) wrote: “If I believe what He (Jesus) said about sin, salvation, forgiveness, the love of God the Father, eternal life, His own identity, and all the other big truths (John 3:16–17; 5:17–21; 11:25–26.), then it stands to reason that what He said about His return is equally true. Jesus is coming! The glorious appearing of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ, is imminent! (Titus 2:13).
Ann’s statement is right on target, but it triggers questions in my mind:
If Christians believe the Bible is the Word of God, why do so many doubt or ignore what it says about the return of Jesus?
If Jesus is coming back to make this world better (establish peace, justice, and righteousness on earth), why aren’t more Christians excited about it?
If the return of Jesus is our blessed hope, why are so many Christians living without hope today?
If the Rapture of the Church is near, why aren’t more Christians talking about the dangers of being left behind, taking the Mark of the Beast, etc.?
I suppose there are many reasons why (unbelief; complicated subject; scary, etc.), but make no mistake about it, Jesus is coming back ready or not, and the number of people that think we are getting close is rapidly growing.
Anyway, here are some recent current events that seem to indicate that we are getting close to the return of Jesus for His church (Rapture).
One, concerning war between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon: on Aug. 1, 2023, Israeli Prime Min. Netanyahu met with Israeli military and security officials to discuss Hezbollah’s actions on Israel’s northern border with Lebanon.
They concluded that the threat of war is the greatest it has been in the last 17 years (since the end of the Second Lebanon War in 2006).
Southern Lebanon is part of the Land that God said Israel will get at the end of the age.
Put another way: Hezbollah is occupying part of the Promised Land and will lose it if it starts a third war with Israel.
(More: On Aug. 3, 2023, Israel notified the UN Security Council that the situation on its border with Lebanon is a powder keg. This writer is not aware of the UN doing anything to calm the situation.)
(More: On Aug. 8, 2023, Israel’s Defense Min. warned Hezbollah and Lebanon that Israel is prepared to strike all of Hezbollah’s assets and return Lebanon to the stone age if Israel is attacked.)
(More: On Aug. 8, 2023, it was reported that Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and other nations are warning their citizens to leave Lebanon. It was also reported that Israel is trying to prepare for casualties and damage in the event that they are struck by thousands of rockets in the next few days.)
Two, concerning the coming global famine: on Aug. 2, 2023, Ukraine’s Pres. Zelensky accused Russia of trying to create a global catastrophe by disrupting the global food supply and collapsing global food markets.
Zelensky was referring to the fact that Russia is preventing the shipment of Ukrainian food exports to other nations, causing the price of food to rise and increasing hunger and famine in Africa.
Three, concerning the 2024 elections: on Aug. 3, 2023, it was reported that a man known for shady dealings, George Soros, has given more than $750,000 and created a political action committee (PAC) to convert the state of Texas from Republican to Democrat.
Large contributions like this one are one reason why many politicians do the bidding of globalists instead of the voters.
The politicians have been bought and paid for.
Four, concerning wickedness (as in the days of Noah): on Aug. 4, 2023, it was reported that crime in Washington D.C. has gotten so bad that the Mexican government (home of the drug cartels) is warning its citizens to avoid going there.
Five, concerning the coming economic collapse: on Aug. 4, 2023, Michael Hartnett, a strategist at the Bank of America (based on Congressional Budget Office data), predicted that America’s national debt will rise $5.2 billion a day every day for the next ten years.
(More: On Aug. 7, 2023, Moody’s cut the ratings of ten small to mid-size banks in the U.S. and said it may soon have to downgrade some of America’s largest banks.)
(More: On Aug. 8, 2023, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York reported that in the second quarter of 2023, credit card debt in the U.S. reached $1.03 trillion.)
(More: On Aug. 8, 2023, at the time this is being written, all the oil being used in the world is being sold in U.S. dollars. On Aug. 22, 2023, the BRICS nations plan to announce that 60% of the oil being used in the world will be sold in their new gold-backed currency. Many experts say this will eventually cause the value of the dollar to drop significantly.)
Six, concerning an Israeli normalization agreement with Saudi Arabia that would be a big step toward peace: on Aug. 7, 2023, Israeli Prime Min. Netanyahu said he believes the two nations could achieve some form of normalization in the coming months.
Time will tell.
Seven, concerning the ashes of a red heifer and a rebuilt Temple: on Aug. 8, 2023, it was reported that the Jews are only months away from having a red heifer that is old enough to sacrifice.
It has also been reported that the Israeli government has discretely shifted some funds to prepare for purification services and possibly the construction of a third Temple.
According to the report, very little is being said about this because it is an explosive issue.
Eight, concerning the coming cashless society and tracking all buying and selling: the opponent of Chancellor Karl Nehammer in Austria’s upcoming election accused Nehammer of planning to ban cash and track Austria’s citizens.
Nehammer has responded by announcing plans to push a law that guarantees Austrian citizens the right to make purchases with cash.
FYI: God does not send anyone to Hell (all of us are born with a sin nature and destined to go to Hell because we sin), but God has provided a way (Jesus) for everyone to go to Heaven (and He is the only way to get there; John 14:6).
Finally, are you Rapture Ready?
If you want to be rapture ready and go to heaven, you must be born again (John 3:3). God loves you, and if you have not done so, sincerely admit that you are a sinner; believe that Jesus is the virgin-born, sinless Son of God who died for the sins of the world, was buried, and raised from the dead; ask Him to forgive your sins, cleanse you, come into your heart and be your Saviour; then tell someone that you have done this.
2 notes · View notes
dyke-on · 1 year
Text
If you end up "debating" a conservative, literally just act confused and apathetic towards the dumb shit they think is so pressing, it shows how reactionary their politics are, for example:
Illegal/legal immigrants = "so, who cares if people come here, they were there now they're here what's the difference, no they don't commit more crime, you wouldn't care if they were from europe, they flee their countries for a better life not because they want to ruin yours etc."
LGBT people = "why are you so obsessed with a tiny minority, you keep talking about them as if they are personally harming you, you know I'm queer right, no we aren't forcing this on you, we are forced to be cishet, the church assaults children and yet you don't care then, drag isn't sexual they're just performing like any pop star does etc."
BLM = "you know black lives matter doesn't mean white people deserve to die or something right, it's just about pointing out how much worse black people are treated by the police vs white people, not "all" lives are constantly threatened by violence and kept in destitute poverty"
Climate change = "it's real whether you understand it or not, only the oil industry elites (use their terminology) want you to think it's a lie so you don't question their power"
Wealthy "marxist" elite corporations(or whatever tf) = "they aren't marixst they just want to make money and will profit off of whatever is popular rn, oh wealthy elites? you mean elon musk, jeff bezos, tucker carlson, the koch brothers? you know they're capitalist right-wingers, those elites?"
Masculinity/whiteness under attack = "literally no one is stopping you from being a white man, you're just insecure in your white manhood and feel threatened by those who are happier than you"
Feminism bad = "feminism isn't trying to treat men the way men have treated us for centuries but go off"
Abortion = "the bible doesn't condemn abortion, you don't actually care about children otherwise you'd be pro public funding going to lifting people out of poverty, even if the bible condemned it that's your problem this isn't a theocratic state like sAuDi ArAbiA"
Traditional families are under attack = "no they aren't most people still get hetero married and birth children literally wtf are you talking about"
Taxes bad = "then don't have a government. Or why don't we completely defund the military so we don't pay to murder people in other countries, that will actually lower taxes, even better tax these wealthy elites and lower taxes for low income earners, nationalize industries for a controlled economy and increase wages so we eliminate poverty and can actually afford to pay taxes, just a thought."
I can go on but anyway the best thing to do is propose a bunch of socialist policies and reveal a the very end that btw that's what socialism actually is.
Bonus! Jews run the media (or other industry) = " no actually white christians run most industries, but you don't complain about that for some reason."
6 notes · View notes
Text
Punctuation Marks, and Jesus.
Palm Sunday, and Not a Palmist Open Anywhere!
Tumblr media
The 'Almighty Gob'.
Well, as I continue on my quest to learn how to write proper, I've now successfully reached page 547 of 'Punctuation Marks - And How To Use Them'. It won't be long now before I'll be on 'Grammar for Dummies' - and something called 'Syntax'. No, me neither. Ah well, never let it be said I'm someone who would deny myself a challenge, and if you bear with for the next decade my ambition to write for 'The Sunday Sport' may just come to fruition. In the meantime, I'm still hopeful of receiving the 'Joe Biden Literacy Award' for achievements in blogging.
Well, what do you know? Apparently, today is Palm Sunday and there isn't a palmist open anywhere! So, it looks like the reading of my life, heart, marriage, head, and money lines will have to wait for another day when no pun intended, I have less time on my hands. Almost coincidentally, it is a day when Catholics everywhere, and some even of the Roman variety, attend church for a ceremony that can involve processions and the distribution of blessed palm leaves. In some churches, the palms are saved and burned into ashes to be used on Ash Wednesday of the next year - and although there is no clear evidence to support it, Catholics in Amsterdam enjoy a similar ceremony in the spirit of Jesus, and call it Hash Wednesday.
Anyway, according to folklore, Palm Sunday commemorates the Christian belief in the triumphant entry of Jesus into Jerusalem, when he was greeted by cheering crowds waving palm branches that set out the ground along his path. Well, at least traditionally that's how it went. Whereas nowadays you're more likely to find people marching through the streets shouting "Free Palestine", with poor old Jesus not even getting a look in. Mind you, this particular ceremony is usually only reserved for a Saturday, in all fairness.
How do I know so much, you may well ask? Well, to be honest, I'm what is called a 'lapsed Catholic'. Actually no, that isn't true at all. I'm more of a prolapsed Catholic. You know, prolapsed, like the rear end of a gay male. Or, not to be taken as sexist, the front lower middle region of the female.
Yes, you've got it, that part. By the way, was any of that offensive, and should I move hastily on now? Okay then, I will. We'll perhaps leave Jesus until this time next week when he's over 2,000 years old, and Christians the world over will be celebrating his birthday with chocolate eggs, because, as we all know he was rather partial to a 'Celebration'. Although, perhaps not so much the one where he was nailed to a cross - a tradition still seemingly carried on by courts in Saudi Arabia from time to time, and Sudan, I believe.
Old habits die hard, huh?
On reflection, I think I've done rather well this week. So far, at least, I've probably gained several fatwahs from our Muslim friends, and now I face being completely excommunicated by the religion of my childhood. Can life get much better, I ask myself? Well, it sure ain't for the want of trying.
Meanwhile, life will go on, as per usual, and for the time being, other stories will tickle my humour genes, because every hour of every day issues are pretty much deliberately hurled at me to catch and make light of in the moment, for the delectation of me, and you.
In an increasingly insane world where stupid people who deserve to have their toenails clipped by a chainsaw live among us and are allowed to vote, isn't it good to know that the one real salvation we have is a sense of humour that will enable us through any, and all situations when put to work?
So, I find myself full circle now, and back where I started. Punctuation marks, and Jesus.
0 notes
biblenewsprophecy · 6 months
Text
COP28: King Charles and scripture, Bill Gates improperly optimistic, India increases coal production, and higher heat is coming
COGwriter
The 28th meeting of the Conference on the Parties (COP28) is taking place in Dubai. Here is a report from the Associated Press:
Top world leaders talk of climate crisis at UN summit. They say they must act on fossil fuels, …
December 1, 2023
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — International climate talks turned to a power game on Friday as dozens of world leaders took turns bemoaning the pain of an overheating planet, but two of the world’s most powerful men — President Joe Biden of the U.S. and China’s President Xi Jinping — were glaringly absent.
Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman of Saudi Arabia, a top oil producer, and Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India, whose biggest cities are regularly choked under poor air, as well as Presidents Emmanuel Macron of France, Cyril Ramaphosa of South Africa, Abdel Fattah el-Sissi of Egypt and Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey were among more than 170 world leaders set to address the United Nations climate conference in Dubai over the next two days. The idea is to try to keep the planet from heating too much because of humankind’s actions. …
Still with all the problems of the world, “climate change stands out by far as the defining issue of our era,” Kenya President William Ruto said.
Ruto and many of the leaders repeated the major goals of conference organizers to triple renewable energy and double energy efficiency. Those goals aren’t controversial, but what to do about fossil fuels is.
Britain’s King Charles III warned of “a starker and darker world” unless leaders change course.
“The hope of the world rests on the decisions you must take,” he told leaders, urging them “to meet it with ambition, imagination, and a true sense of the emergency we face.”
“The Earth does not belong to us, we belong to the Earth,” Charles said. https://apnews.com/article/cop28-climate-summit-dubai-oil-fossil-fuel-global-warming-f72309c3d0a17c40817b7d2bbf55829b
As the self-declared “defender of faiths,” King Charles should realize that the Bible teaches:
1 The earth is the Lord’s, and all its fullness, The world and those who dwell therein. (Psalm 24:1)
Yes, the Earth belongs to God.
As far as how Christians should view the environment, going to the book of Genesis is a good place to start.
Notice:
15 Then the Lord God took the man and put him in the garden of Eden to tend and keep it. (Genesis 2:15)
Humans were to be stewards over God’s creation.
Now notice else about it:
24 Then God said, “Let the earth bring forth the living creature according to its kind: cattle and creeping thing and beast of the earth, each according to its kind”; and it was so. 25 And God made the beast of the earth according to its kind, cattle according to its kind, and everything that creeps on the earth according to its kind. And God saw that it was good.
26 Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over the cattle, over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” 27 So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. 28 Then God blessed them, and God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it; have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over every living thing that moves on the earth.”
29 And God said, “See, I have given you every herb that yields seed which is on the face of all the earth, and every tree whose fruit yields seed; to you it shall be for food. 30 Also, to every beast of the earth, to every bird of the air, and to everything that creeps on the earth, in which there is life, I have given every green herb for food”; and it was so. 31 Then God saw everything that He had made, and indeed it was very good. (Genesis 1:24-31)
Pollution, which harms the creation, is not good.
Scripture also states:
33 So you shall not pollute the land where you are … (Numbers 35:33)
So, holders of the true faith realize that we do not want to be polluters.
People like COP28 speaker Bill Gates believe that a godless way to solve climate issues is coming. Notice the following:
Bill Gates shares his ‘big hope’ for COP28 as world leaders gather for climate talks
December 1, 2023
Dubai, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES — Microsoft
co-founder Bill Gates on Friday shared his “big hope” for this year’s U.N. climate conference and said he was “definitely glass half-full” when it comes to preventing the worst of what the climate crisis has in store.
Speaking as world leaders convened in Dubai in the United Arab Emirates on the second day of the COP28 summit, Gates said he believed there were many encouraging climate solutions but that these projects required the necessary support from policymakers and business leaders.
“Now, we need to take what looks very promising and scale it up, build the pilot plants, prove those out,” Gates told CNBC’s Tania Bryer on Friday. “And that requires government policies, it requires the big corporations to come in and so all these different communities that have to come together, they are represented here.”
COP28 is the United Nations’ biggest and most important annual climate conference. The two-week long summit got underway on Thursday, with more than 160 world leaders expected to attend — alongside an estimated 70,000 delegates. …
Gates defended the platform as a means to help drive progress across the globe.
“The collaboration between those sectors has improved a great deal,” Gates told CNBC.
“We are falling short of our aspirations in many areas and coming and saying, you know, how do we catch up? Can we do better in one area? Which countries are doing particularly well? Are there models from that?” https://www.cnbc.com/2023/12/01/bill-gates-shares-his-big-hope-for-the-cop28-climate-conference.html
Regarding falling short and trying to catch up, we recently put together the following video:
youtube
15:02
UN Wants to Accelerate Agenda 2030
The United Nations has ’17 Sustainable Development Goals’ as part of its Agenda 2030 adopted back in 2025. In September 2023, a summit was held where the UN pushed for the acceleration of the goals and many were not progressing as the UN wanted them to. Are these goals consistent with what Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum, the Vatican (in Pope Francis’ Laudato Si encyclical) and Lynn Rothschild’s Council for Inclusive Capitalism have called for? Might this all be leading to some type of a totalitarian globalist system? Are parts of the goals good? Are some of the goals unattainable according to the Bible? Has the UN been pushing toward a global system of governance? Will a totalitarian system result in utopia before Jesus returns and ushers in the millennial Kingdom of God? Could the year 2030 be relevant? Dr. Thiel and Steve Dupuie discuss these matters and more.
Here is a link to our video: UN Wants to Accelerate Agenda 2030.
One of the bigger components of air pollution many have pointed to is coal production. The nation of India has been increasing its use of coal for energy generation (bolding in source):
December 1, 2023
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi proposed that the South Asian nation, which is the world’s most populous country, host the climate talks in 2028. India is the third biggest carbon polluting nation. https://apnews.com/article/cop28-climate-summit-dubai-oil-fossil-fuel-global-warming-f72309c3d0a17c40817b7d2bbf55829b
November 30, 2023
India produced a record amount of electricity from coal in October to make up for a shortfall in hydro generation following lower-than-normal monsoon rains. …
Notwithstanding the ambitions expressed at the UN climate conference in Dubai, for the foreseeable future, India will depend on its mines and rail network to satisfy rapidly growing electricity demand and ensure reliability. …
Coal-fired generators produced a seasonal record of 111 billion kWh in October 2023 up from 84 billion kWh in October 2022. …
To cope with rising electricity demand and poor hydrological conditions, India boosted mine production and the volume hauled by the railways to generators to record rates in October.
Coal output was up by 13 million tonnes in October and by a total of 87 million tonnes since January compared with a year earlier. https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/india-produced-record-amounts-electricity-coal-october
This is not to attempt to say that there is no use for coal, only that the world’s most populous nation is increasing its use.
Higher heat is prophesied to come:
8 Then the fourth angel poured out his bowl on the sun, and power was given to him to scorch men with fire. 9 And men were scorched with great heat, and they blasphemed the name of God who has power over these plagues; and they did not repent and give Him glory. (Revelation 6:8-9).
Since scripture points to higher heat coming, the Bible shows that COP28 will not be able to possibly stop that.
Physical survival is at risk as Jesus prophesied “unless the Lord had shortened those days, no flesh would be saved” (Mark 13:20).
The Bible also shows that the globalists will not fix the planet. The Bible shows that Jesus will have to destroy some of the world’s end time leaders as they will have been actually destroying the earth:
18 The nations were angry, and Your wrath has come, And the time of the dead, that they should be judged, And that You should reward Your servants the prophets and the saints, And those who fear Your name, small and great, And should destroy those who destroy the earth. (Revelation 11:18)
Despite having great goals like reducing pollution and helping the earth, the opposite will happen.
The Bible teaches:
1 Unless the Lord builds the house, They labor in vain who build it; Unless the Lord guards the city, The watchman stays awake in vain. (Psalm 127:1)
Leaving the true God out of the picture, which is what nearly all the most vocal ‘climate change activists’ do, will not lead to a real solution. Hence, Bill Gates, who supports the godless, globalist approach, is wrong in his optimism.
Here is how the climate could be fixed:
3 ‘If you walk in My statutes and keep My commandments, and perform them, 4 then I will give you rain in its season, the land shall yield its produce, and the trees of the field shall yield their fruit. 5 Your threshing shall last till the time of vintage, and the vintage shall last till the time of sowing; you shall eat your bread to the full, and dwell in your land safely. 6 I will give peace in the land, and you shall lie down, and none will make you afraid; I will rid the land of evil beasts, and the sword will not go through your land. (Leviticus 26:3-6)
Yes, there is a biblical solution to climate change, but world leaders have overlooked that.
But, people will heed God and His ways during the millennial Kingdom of God.
Until the arrival of that Kingdom all human beings should strive to obey God while being careful about waste and pollution. And all should also pray for God’s kingdom to come (Matthew 6:10).
Related to last year’s  COP27, we have put together the following video on our Bible News Prophecy YouTube channel:
youtube
14:42
COP 27 and Solving Climate Change
The dates for the United Nations Climate Change meeting called COP 27 are November 6th through 18th, 2022. During that time, on November 13, 2022, a ‘Chrislam’ type group composed of leaders from the Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Protestant, Islamic, Buddhist, Hindu, and other faiths associated with the Interfaith Center for Sustainable Development and the Elijah Interfaith Institute are making what they titled ‘A Prophetic Call for Climate Justice’ and are having a ‘Ceremony of Repentance’ on what is referred to as Mount Sinai, in Egypt. Do this sound Gaia, mother goddess worship? Are Christians supposed to have religious ceremonies with pagans? What did the Apostle Paul write? What did Jesus say would happen to the earth? Are humans, apart from God, going to solve climate problems before Jesus returns? Is there any type of false gospel associated with aspects of the climate change movement? Would obeying God solve the issues of pollution and climate change? What about the good news, the gospel of the Kingdom of God? Does the Bible have the solution to pollution? Does the Bible have the answer to solving climate change? Dr Thiel and Steve Dupuie discuss these issues.
Here is a link to our video: COP 27 and Solving Climate Change.
The Bible does reveal that there is a solution to pollution and ‘climate change.’
Disobedience to God is the cause of it and obeying and turning to the true God is the solution.
While we do not want to promote pollution, temperature records are going to be broken and new ones set.
The solution is to turn to God and seek first the Kingdom of God and His righteousness as Jesus said (cf. Matthew 6:33).
Related Items: The Bible, Christians, and the Environment How should Christians view the environment? Does the Bible give any clues? What are some of the effects of air, water, and land pollution? Is environmental pollution a factor in autism and death? Do pollutants seem to double the autism risk? What will Jesus do? Here is a link to a related sermon: Christians and the Environment (there is also a YouTube video available titled Air Pollution, Autism, and Prophecy, one titled Will Pollution lead to the End?, and one called COP 27 and Solving Climate Change).
Christian Health Matters Should Christians be concerned about their health? Does the Bible give any food and health guidelines? Here are links to three related sermons: Let’s Talk About Food, Evil is Affecting the Food Supply, and Let’s Talk About Health.
United Nations: Humankind’s Last Hope or New World Order? Is the UN the last hope for humanity? Or might its goals end up with sinister results? Two related videos include UN’s ‘New Universal Agenda’ is a False Gospel! and United Nations and Vatican Are Planning the New World Order.
Did The Early Church Teach Millenarianism? Was the millennium (sometimes called chiliasm) taught by early Christians? Who condemned it? Will Jesus literally reign for 1000 years on the earth? Is this time near? Two related sermons are available Millennial Utopia and The Millennium.
Could God Have a 6,000 Year Plan? What Year Does the 6,000 Years End? Was a 6000 year time allowed for humans to rule followed by a literal thousand year reign of Christ on Earth taught by the early Christians? Does God have 7,000 year plan? What year may the six thousand years of human rule end? When will Jesus return? 2031 or 2025 or? There is also a video titled When Does the 6000 Years End? 2031? 2035? Here is a link to the article in Spanish: ¿Tiene Dios un plan de 6,000 años?
Lost Tribes and Prophecies: What will happen to Australia, the British Isles, Canada, Europe, New Zealand and the United States of America? Where did those people come from? Can you totally rely on DNA? What about other peoples? Do you really know what will happen to Europe and the English-speaking peoples? What about Africa, Asia, South America, and the Islands? This free online book provides scriptural, scientific, historical references, and commentary to address those matters. Here are links to related sermons: Lost tribes, the Bible, and DNA; Lost tribes, prophecies, and identifications; 11 Tribes, 144,000, and Multitudes; Israel, Jeremiah, Tea Tephi, and British Royalty; Gentile European Beast; Royal Succession, Samaria, and Prophecies; Asia, Islands, Latin America, Africa, and Armageddon;  When Will the End of the Age Come?;  Rise of the Prophesied King of the North; Christian Persecution from the Beast; WWIII and the Coming New World Order; and Woes, WWIV, and the Good News of the Kingdom of God.
The Gospel of the Kingdom of God This free online pdf booklet has answers many questions people have about the Gospel of the Kingdom of God and explains why it is the solution to the issues the world is facing. It is available in hundreds of languages at ccog.org. Here are links to four kingdom-related sermons:  The Fantastic Gospel of the Kingdom of God!, The World’s False Gospel, The Gospel of the Kingdom: From the New and Old Testaments, and The Kingdom of God is the Solution.
Will the Interfaith Movement Lead to Peace or Sudden Destruction? Is the interfaith movement going to lead to lasting peace or is it warned against? A video sermon of related interest is: Will the Interfaith Movement lead to World War III? and a video sermon is also available: Do You Know That Babylon is Forming?
Laudato Si: Pope’s Agenda or Kingdom of God? Pope Francis’ 2nd encyclical is titled ‘Laudato Si.’ In it, he goes over his views related to environmental, economic, social, moral, agricultural, and spiritual issues. He advocates international cooperation to solve various problems he believes are affecting humanity. Is that Pope’s agenda the solution? What about the Kingdom of God? does the Bible teach? Two related articles include Laudato Si: Will Pope Francis’ economic actions match his words? and Laudato Si: A call for a one-world government?
LATEST NEWS REPORTS
LATEST BIBLE PROPHECY INTERVIEWS
0 notes
drmaqazi · 7 months
Text
JEWISH TERRORISM IN OCCUPIED HOLY LAND
January 11, 2016, Israeli Author to Le Monde: ‘We Live Under an Apartheid Regime’ by Shlomo Papirblat, Haartez, 1/11/2016
http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.696636 January 17, 2016, Israeli settlers scrawl hate graffiti on Jerusalem church,  Ma’an News Agency, 1/17/2016 “…the doors of the Dormition Abbey church were vandalized with threats scrawled in Hebrew that read: ‘Kill the Christians, the enemy of Israel’ and ‘The revenge is coming very soon,’ as well as ‘Send Christians to hell.’…In 2014, a suspected Israeli extremist lit a prayer book on fire in the abbey, in what police at the time said was a suspected arson attack just hours after Pope Francis held mass at a nearby Christian holy spot during a visit to the area.
“A year before that, Israeli extremists spray-painted ‘Jesus is a monkey’ in Hebrew outside the church, and ‘Havat Maon,’ the name of an illegal Israeli settler outpost that had been dismantled by the Israeli government just days before the attack, Israeli daily Haaretz reported at the time. “In 2012, suspected extremists spray-painted ‘Jesus, son of a bitch,’ in Hebrew, with the words ‘price tag,’ a term used by Israeli extremists to mark nationalist-motivated hate crimes.
“Abu Nassar said in the past that the extremists responsible for the attacks were not prosecuted by the Israeli government in a ‘serious way.’ Dormition Abbey dates back to the 5th century, and is thought to be the place where the Virgin Mary died. ” http://www.maannews.com/Content.aspx?id=769842 February 17, 2016, IDF soldiers electrocute blindfolded Palestinian for fun, laugh while filming (GRAPHIC VIDEO)
https://www.rt.com/news/332742-israeli-soldiers-electrocute-palestinian/ February 24, 2016, ‘Cruel, inhuman and degrading:’ Israel’s systematic abuse of Palestinian detainees exposed by NGOs
https://www.rt.com/news/333532-israel-abuse-palestinian-detainees/ March 24, 2016, B'Tselem volunteer Imad Abu Shamsiyeh documented Elor Azaria, a soldier, murdering Abd al-Fatah a-Sharif, a Palestinian who had carried out a knife attack and was lying wounded on the road after soldiers had shot him.
https://youtu.be/S8WK2TgruMo see also: https://twitter.com/Robert_Martin72/status/977853085757276160
Try watching this video on www.youtube.com, March 28, 2016, Israeli Chief Sephardi Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef preaches that Gentiles have no place in “Israel” except as servants who observe the rabbis’ Noachide Laws.
“According to Jewish law, it’s forbidden for a non-Jew to live in the Land of Israel – unless he has accepted the seven Noachide laws.”
“Who will be the servers? Who will be our assistants? Therefore, we leave them here in the land.”
Sephardi Chief Rabbi Says non-Jews Forbidden From Living in the Land of Israel, Haaretz, March 28, 2016
Chief rabbi: Non-Jews shouldn’t be allowed to live in Israel, Times of Israel, March 28, 2016
April 11, 2016, Israeli occupation authorities (IOA) destroyed 523 Palestinian homes and civilian structures in the West Bank since the start of 2016
http://english.pnn.ps/2016/04/11/israel-destroyed-523-palestinian-structures-in-3-months/ May 22, 2016, New Israeli death penalty would apply to non-Jews only: Likud source
http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/new-israeli-death-penalty-would-apply-non-jews-only-likud-source-450286359 http://www.blacklistednews.com/New_Israeli_death_penalty_would_apply_to_non-Jews_only%3A_Likud_source/51333/0/38/38/Y/M.html but is actually consistent with an old law from the Torah, Sanhedrin 57a:
July 12, 2016, IDF's chief rabbi-to-be Eyal Karim permits raping women in wartime
The rabbi gave a more shocking answer on the same site when asked if soldiers were permitted to rape women during war. Karim replied that, as part of maintaining fitness for the army and the soldiers' morale during fighting, it is permitted to “breach” the walls of modesty and “satisfy the evil inclination by lying with attractive Gentile women against their will, out of consideration for the difficulties faced by the soldiers and for overall success.”
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4827240,00.html http://thefreethoughtproject.com/idf-chief-rabbi-permits-raping-women/ August 4, 2016, Israeli Border Police Bully 8-year old Palestinian Girl and “Confiscate” (steal) Her Bicycle
youtube
Try watching this video on www.youtube.com, December 12, 2016, Lawyer of Israelis who beat to death black non-Jew for talking to white Jewesses claims they were trying to help him (use Google Translate) http://bit.ly/2hbrPDu December 22, 2016, Israeli soldiers sentenced to three months  community service for killing unarmed Palestinian teen “Two IDF soldiers shot Palestinian teenage Samir Awad from behind eight times in January 2013, killing him. Nearly four years and a string of investigative failures later, it looks unlikely that either of the accused will go to jail.”
http://mondoweiss.net/2016/12/sentenced-community-palestinian/ December 27, 2016, Israeli forces killed 31 Palestinian youths in the occupied West Bank in 2016 “2016 has been deadliest year of the past decade for West Bank children, according to Defense for Children International–Palestine. In the past year Israeli forces have killed 31 Palestinian children in the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem. Ayed Abu Eqtaish, Accountability Program director at DCIP, says, ‘Intentional lethal force now appears to be routinely used by Israeli forces, even in unjustified situations, with no accountability, putting more and more children at risk.’”
0 notes
autismserenity · 2 months
Text
Someone on Reddit made the mistake of saying, "Teach me how this conflict came about" where I could see it.
Let me teach you too.
The common perception is that Jews came out of nowhere, stole Palestinian homes and kicked Palestinians out of them, and then bombed them for 75 years, until they finally rebelled in the form of Hamas invading Israel and massacring 22 towns in one day.
The historical reality is that Jews have lived there continuously for at least 3500 years.
There are areas, like Meggido iirc, with archeological evidence of continuous habitation for 7,000 years, but Jewish culture as we recognize it today didn't develop until probably halfway through that.
Ethnic Jews are the indigenous people of this area.
Indigeneity means a group was originally there, before any colonization happened, and that it has retained a cultural connection to the land. History plus culture.
That's what Jews have: even when the diaspora became larger than the number of Jews in Israel, the yearning to return to that homeland was a daily part of Jewish prayer and ritual.
The Jewish community in Israel was crushed pretty violently by the Roman Empire in 135 CE, but it was still substantial, sometimes even the majority population there, for almost a thousand years.
The 600s CE brought the advent of Islam and the Arab Empire, expanding out from Saudi Arabia into Israel and beyond. It was largely a region where Jews were second-class citizens. But it was still WAY better than the way Christian Europe treated Jews.
From the 700s-900s, the area saw repeated civil wars, plagues, and earthquakes.
Then the Crusades came, with waves of Christians making "pilgrimages to the Holy Land" and trying to conquer it from Muslims and Jews, who they slaughtered and enslaved.
Israel became pretty well depopulated after all that. It was a very rough time to live there. (And for the curious, I'm calling it Israel because that's what it had been for centuries, until the Romans erased the name and the country.)
By the 1800s, the TOTAL population of what's now Israel and Palestine had varied from 150,000 - 275,000 for centuries. It was very rural, very sparsely populated, on top of being mostly desert.
In the 1880s, Jews started buying land and moving back to their indigenous homeland. As tends to happen, immigration brought new projects and opportunities, which led to more immigration - not only from Jews, but from the Arab world as well.
Unfortunately, there was an antisemitic minority spearheaded by Amin al-Husseini. Who was very well-connected, rich, and from a politically powerful family.
Al-Husseini had enthusiastically participated in the Armenian Genocide under the Ottoman Empire. Then the Empire fell in World War One, and the League of Nations had to figure out what to do with its land.
Mostly, if an area was essentially operating as a country (e.g. Turkey), the League of Nations let it be one. In areas that weren't ready for self-rule, it appointed France or Britain to help them get there.
In recognition of the increased Jewish population in their traditional, indigenous homeland, it declared that that homeland would again become Israel.
As in, the region was casually called Palestine because that was the lay term for "the Holy Land." It had not been a country since Israel was stamped out; only a region of a series of different empires. And the Mandate For Palestine said it was establishing "a national home of the Jewish people" there, in recognition of "the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country."
Britain was appointed to help the Arab and Jewish communities there develop systems of self-government, and then to work together to govern the region overall.
At least, that was the plan.
Al-Husseini, who was deeply antisemitic, did not like this plan.
And, extra-unfortunately, the British response to al-Husseini inciting violent anti-Jewish riots was to put him in a leadership role over Arab Palestine.
They thought it would calm him down and perhaps satisfy him.
They were very wrong.
He went on to become a huge Hitler fanboy, and then a Nazi war criminal. He co-created the Muslim Brotherhood - which Hamas is part of - with fellow fascist fanboy Hassan al-Banna.
He got Nazi Party funding for armed Muslim Brotherhood militias to attack Jews and the Brits in the late 30s, convincing Britain to agree to limit Jewish immigration at the time when it was most desperately needed.
He started using the militias again in 1947, when the United Nations voted to divide the mandated land into a Jewish homeland and a Palestinian one.
Al-Husseini wouldn't stand for a two-state solution. He was determined to tolerate no more than the subdued, small Jewish minority of second-class citizens that he remembered from his childhood.
As armed militias increasingly ran riot, the Arab middle and upper classes increasingly left. About 100,000 left the country before May 1948, when Britain was to pull out, leaving Israel and Palestine to declare their independence.
The surrounding nations didn't want war. They largely accepted the two-state solution.
But al-Husseini lobbied HARD. And by mobilizing the Muslim Brotherhood to provide "destabilizing mass demonstrations and a murderous campaign of intimidation," he got the Arab League nations to agree to invade, en masse, as soon as Britain left.
About 600,000 Arabs fled to those countries during the ensuing war.
Jews couldn't seek refuge there; in fact, most of those countries either exiled their Jews directly, confiscating their property first, or else made Jewish life unlivable and exploited them for underpaid or slave labor for years first.
By the time the smoke cleared and a peace treaty was signed, most of the Arab Palestinian community had fled; there was no Arab Palestinian leadership; many of the refugees' homes and businesses had left had been destroyed in the war; and Israel had been flooded with nearly a million refugees from the Arab League countries and the Holocaust - even more people than had fled the war.
That was the Nakba. The one that gets portrayed as "750,000 Palestinians fled or were expelled!" in the hope that you'll assume they were expelled en masse, their beautiful intact homes all stolen.
Egypt had taken what's now the Gaza Strip in that war, and Jordan took what's now the West Bank - expelling or killing all the Jews in it first.
(Ironically, Jordan was originally supposed to be part of Israel. Britain, inexplicably, cut off what would have been 75% of its land to create Jordan.
Tumblr media
Even more inexplicably, nobody ever talks about it. I've never seen anyone complain that Jordan was stolen from Palestinians. Possibly because Jordan is also the only country that gave Palestinian refugees full citizenship, and it's about half Palestinian now.
Israel is nearly 25% Arab Palestinians with full citizenship and equal rights, so it's not all that different -- but the fundamental difference of living in a country where the majority is Jewish, not Muslim, probably runs pretty deep.)
Anyway: that's why Palestine is Gaza and the West Bank, rather than being some contiguous chunk of land. Or being the land set aside by the U.N. in 1947.
Because Arab countries took that land in 1948, and treated them as essentially separate for 20 years.
Israel got them back, along with the Golan Heights and the Sinai Peninsula, in the next war: 1967, when Egypt committed an act of war by taking control of the waterways and barring Israel from them. It gave the Sinai back to Egypt as part of the 1979 peace accords between Egypt and Israel.
Israel tried to give back the Gaza Strip at the same time. Egypt refused.
Palestine finally declared independence in 1988.
But Hamas formed at about the same time. Probably in response, in fact. Hamas is fundamentally opposed to peace negotiations with Israel.
Again: Hamas is part of a group founded by Nazis.
Hamas has its own charter. It explains that Jews are "the enemy," because they control the drug trade, have been behind every major war, control the media, control the United Nations, etc. Basic Nazi rhetoric.
It has gotten adept at masking that rhetoric for the West. But to friendlier audiences, its leaders have consistently said things like, "People of Jerusalem, we want you to cut off the heads of the Jews with knives. With your hand, cut their artery from here. A knife costs five shekels.  Buy a knife, sharpen it, put it there, and just cut off [their heads]. It costs just five shekels."
(Palestinians were outraged by this speech. Palestinians, by and large, absolutely loathe Hamas.
It's just that it's not the same to say that to locals, as it is to say it where major global powers who oppose this crap can hear you.)
Hamas has stated from the beginning that its mission is to violently destroy Israel and take over the land.
It has received $100M in military funding annually, from Iran, for several years. Because Iran has been building a network of fascist, antisemitic groups across the Middle East, in a blatant attempt to control more and more of it: Hezbollah in Lebanon. The Houthis in Yemen.
Iran has been run by a very far-right, deeply antisemitic dictatorship for decades now, which pretty openly wants to take down both Israel and the U.S.
Last year, Iran increased Hamas's funding to $350M.
The "proof of concept" invasion of Israel that Hamas pulled off on October 7th more than justifies a much bigger investment.
Hamas has publicly stated its intention to attack "again and again and again," until Israel has been violently destroyed.
That is how this conflict came about.
A Nazi group seized power in Gaza in 2007 by violently kicking the Palestinian government out, and began running it as a dictatorship, using it to build money and power in preparations for exactly this.
And people find it shockingly easy to believe its own hype about being "the Palestinian resistance."
As well as its propaganda that Israel is not actually targeting Hamas: it's just using a literal Nazi invasion and massacre as an excuse to randomly commit genocide of the fraction of Palestine it physically left 20 years ago.
Despite the fact that Palestinians in Gaza have been protesting HAMAS throughout the war.
Tumblr media
10 notes · View notes
keyki421 · 9 months
Text
This is gonna upset some people, but I'm actually okay with France banning the abaya in schools. This is why.
Most Arab countries have rules on what women and men can and cannot wear. It doesn't matter if they are Muslim or any other faith. They still have to follow the dress codes of the country.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Now why isn't France allowed to come up with their own dress code?
If your gonna be angry with France, then be angry with every single Muslim country that does the same. In Saudi Arabia, a Christian person can't even openly practice their religion. There are no churches. What I don't understand is coming to another country that has values you disagree with and don't like. Why are Muslim families trying to live in France, instead of UAE, Saudi, Qatar or several other countries that follow Islamic law. No, ya'll rather go to countries that don't follow Islamic law and then try to intrude and change that country, to fit your needs. It makes no sense to me. It never will.
In the USA, I don't like southern states. I don't agree with their values down there. That is why you will never catch me living down there.
I definitely wanna hear what Muslim women's think and I wanna know if they are finally gonna acknowledge their hypocrisy. Cause some women will defend the rules of their homeland, while thinking that the country they live in, can't make those same type of rules. Can we also acknowledge that even though you guys are Muslim, you don't truly like Islamic law. Cause if you did, you would live in a country that follows it. All I see is people running away from the countries with Islamic law, not running towards them.
0 notes
f1 · 1 year
Text
Perez vows to try everything in Canadian GP recovery drive after missing Q3 for third successive race
Sergio Perez was left to rue another compromised qualifying session in Canada, with the Red Bull driver ending the grid-decider in a lowly 12th position – setting up another damage limitation exercise on race day. Perez has failed to make Q3 at the last three rounds, having followed up his pole position in Miami with a Q1 crash in Monaco that left him 20th, a Q2 exit in Spain that put him 11th and another Q2 elimination in Montreal. READ MORE: Verstappen praises Red Bull for making ‘all the right calls’ on his way to a storming pole position in Montreal Speaking after qualifying, the Red Bull driver lamented his struggles to get a lap in on the soft tyre during a dry/wet second phase, which also saw Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc and Aston Martin’s Lance Stroll fail to make the cut. “It didn’t work out,” stated Perez, who sits 53 points behind pole-sitting team mate Max Verstappen in the drivers’ standings. “I mean, when we went onto the slick, it was just the lap that it started raining. “I needed a lap to get the tyre in the temperature in the working range, and then it just started raining, then we switched [back] to the intermediate, so it was all a bit half a lap, one lap a bit too late to get that lap in.” This feature is currently not available because you need to provide consent to functional cookies. Please update your cookie preferences Qualifying Highlights: 2023 Canadian Grand Prix Asked what can be rescued in the race, he added: “Well, it’s going to be hard to overtake, but we will try everything – we will try everything to come through the field.” Nonetheless, after Perez’s rise from 11th to fourth last time out in Barcelona, Red Bull team boss Christian Horner backed his driver to make plenty of progress across Sunday’s 70-lap encounter. READ MORE: ‘We are just making our lives so much more difficult’ – Leclerc calls on Ferrari to ‘improve now’ after Montreal Q2 exit “Unfortunately for Checo, he just didn’t get that first lap in on the slick tyre when the circuit was in the window, then he came back onto the inter because it was too wet for the slicks, so it was frustrating for him,” Horner commented. “However, unlike Monaco, this is a track that you can overtake at, the forecast is saying it’ll be a dry race, he’s a great racer and he’s got a fast car, so I’d be disappointed if we weren’t much further up the order tomorrow.” Red Bull head into the race looking to maintain their 100% victory record so far this season, with Verstappen having won five races (Bahrain, Australia, Miami, Monaco and Spain) and Perez having triumphed twice (Saudi Arabia and Azerbaijan). via Formula 1 News https://www.formula1.com
0 notes
Hello. I have a question- What do you think about Muslim women who are totally okay with their religion? Like they accept the hijab and all that shit because they don't see anything wrong with it.
My religion professor, when we say that Muslim women are oppressed (I'm an atheist btw), responds with saying: "Yes, there are Muslim women who are and FEEL oppressed, but remember that we don't actually know how they "live their religion"(he said he knows because he travelled around the world and went in Islamic countries, like Arabia), there are many women who don't feel oppressed and accept all that because they believe in their religion and feel comfortable about it."
So, what he's trying to say is that, as atheists or christians or whatever, we only see one side of the same coin, which is the terrible, negative side(oppression, gender inequality etc), and we don't see the other side, where there are women who are comfortable about their religion and "live it" in a way that we wouldn't comprehend, unless we were Muslims.
So..what do you think about it? I mean, when it comes to Muslim women we always generalize saying "they're all oppressed and live a terrible life", but we never actually try to understand how they feel about it, what they think about it -they can't express their opinions what am I saying- the point is, there are Muslim women who are happy about their life, of course there are but.. I'd like to know your opinion on this, because I am a bit confused. I hope i explained myself well since English is not my mother tongue, thanks in advance
Of course they don't have a problem with it. Because they were indoctrinated into it from birth.
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness."
-- Alejandro Jodorowsky
They were brought up with the expectations of the family, the imams, the propaganda about purity, not to mention the messaging that this is the will and directive of Allah.
24.31
And tell the believing women to lower their gaze and guard their chastity, and not to reveal their adornments1 except what normally appears. Let them draw their veils over their chests, and not reveal their ˹hidden˺ adornments3 except to their husbands, their fathers, their fathers-in-law, their sons, their stepsons, their brothers, their brothers’ sons or sisters’ sons, their fellow women, those ˹bondwomen˺ in their possession, male attendants with no desire, or children who are still unaware of women’s nakedness. Let them not stomp their feet, drawing attention to their hidden adornments. Turn to Allah in repentance all together, O  believers, so that you may be successful.
33.59
O Prophet! Ask your wives, daughters, and believing women to draw their cloaks over their bodies. In this way it is more likely that they will be recognized ˹as virtuous˺ and not be harassed. And Allah is All-Forgiving, Most Merciful.
That is, who are you to object when this is what Allah has decreed? To disobey is to risk Allah’s punishment.
Not only is it made very clear that to decline is to disobey direct, divine commandment, but it signals your loose morals and that whatever harassment, assault or even rape befalls you is the direct consequence of your choice not to cover, and therefore your own fault. Which is why the devout feel completely comfortable and entitled to harass, spit at or send death and rape threats to women who dare to remove the hijab.
The believing women cover themselves to avoid harassment. Non-believers don't cover themselves and are entitled to no such immunity from harassment. They are fair game.
Because the doctrine authorizes it.
Even if it didn't (it does), the believers believe it is mandatory and make sure that women and girls know this.
This is actual Saudi Arabia propaganda.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
There's also a purported hadith that describes Muhammad touring Jahannam (hell) and seeing women strung up by their hair with their brains boiling. There are insistences from Muslims that this is a fabricated hadith (although, aren't they all anyway?), but in a way, it doesn't even matter. Because many Muslims tell their daughters anyway, some of them know (or think) it's fabricated, some of them don't, and simply parrot back what they were told. Because it sounds exactly like something out of either the quran or hadith.
With all of this in mind, grow up from birth with all of this messaging surrounding you, then see how you feel about living your life in the sack they put on you at age 8.
“In North Korea I literally believed that my Dear Leader was starving,” she said. “He’s the fattest guy — how can anyone believe that? And then somebody showed me a photo and said, 'Look at him. He’s the fattest guy. Other people are all thin.’ And I was like, 'Oh my God, why did I not notice that he was fat?’ Because I never learned how to think critically.”
-- Yeonmi Park
We don't turn around and go, maybe if the North Koreans are okay with this, we should just leave North Korea alone to do their thing. If they're happy, or merely think they are, then who are we to judge?
Which makes the notion that "we wouldn't comprehend, unless we were Muslims" extremely hard to take. I don't need to live in North Korea to understand that people who live in North Korea deserve better than North Korea. I don't need to have (or have had) cancer to know I don't want cancer.
This is exactly the same argument as Xians insisting you can't understand or criticize the bible unless you believe it. If you read it, then if you don't believe it, then you just didn't understand it, so your arguments are inherently invalid. If you actually understood it, you'd believe it.
Except we know that non-believers often understand the bible better than believers, because they're more objective and don't have the same need to rescue it.
We don't accept this argument from Xians about the bible, so why would we accept it about Islam and Sharia?
The other thing is that we're presuming that Muslim women - and men, for that matter - under the control of Sharia are different creatures than we are, who appreciate, demand and defend our right to choose, unencumbered by undue influence, for ourselves. That despite never really having had the choice, maybe they just like wearing a full-length body bag?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-bBHpJ9_KI&t=47m34s
"I mean there's no way that the same people who cry out to 'free the nipple,' somehow, suddenly their brains just believe that this is a tool of empowerment and freedom and feminism. There's no way! There's no way that the same brain can believe those two things! And it makes me so angry that they think that they only deserve freedom and that women over there are happy and they love it and they like dressing themselves up like this. They like being dehumanized. They like being subjugated."
-- Yasmine Mohammed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-bBHpJ9_KI&t=59m30s
Seth: "So, what would you like to see change? What would you like to see feminists in the West, and everywhere, do differently?"
Yasmine: "I would like them to talk about Muslim women the same way they talk about themselves. I would like them to see us as no different from them. When we talk about all of these issues that we've been addressing, that have to do with feminism, somehow when it comes to Muslims, there's like it's a completely different ballgame."
This professor is saying that Muslim women don't want the same things as western women, don't have the same dreams and desires. They're a different species.
Let us also not forget either that Islam conquered the countries it's now dominant in, and submerged the local culture, replacing it with Sharia and hijab. Islam is not a country or a culture. It's a political and religious ideology that has imposed itself over the top of cultures that fell to it. It's a foreign infection.
So, while one could point out that it's cultural relativism to think that women in Iran or Afghanistan, or even Canadian or American women from fundamentalist Islamic families don't want to the freedoms that "western" women can, and do, take for granted, it's even worse than that. Because Iranian, Afghan, Syrian, Egyptian, etc culture isn't islamic.
At bottom, I think it's absurd and hypocritical to think that people born and indoctrinated into fundamentalist Xian environments might enjoy and embrace secular life if given the opportunity to shed the influence, control, guilt, threats and pressure of Xianity, but that Muslims would not. Why are we prepared to talk Xians out of purity culture, unearned guilt, hate of others outside the group, and so on, but not Muslims?
When we see fundamentalist Xians campaigning against marriage equality, condemning gay people to hell, opposing science education, perpetuating bullshit about COVID, and killing their children by conducting faith healing on them, do we need to see and appreciate "the other side"?
Why would we use different rules for Islam? If Islam is throwing gay people off buildings, executing apostates and blasphemers and critics of Islam, and arresting women who remove their hijab, why do we need to understand "the other side"? We don't. We have reason enough to oppose it already.
In response to complaints he focused on the Catholic Church’s child abuse scandals and attitudes towards condoms, rather than what good it’s done, Stephen Fry responded: "It’s a bit like a burglar in court saying 'oh, you would bring up that burglary and that manslaughter, but you never mention the fact that I give my father a birthday present.'"
Whatever stance you take for Xianity, you should also be prepared to take for Islam. If you're not prepared to do this, then why? If it's some kind of misplaced racial or cultural sensitivity, then I would argue that such a position is itself racist and discriminatory. It's making separate rules, separate standards. Because one needs to be held to a lower standard than the other, since it cannot achieve it.
Let's also not mistake what this is actually about either. It's not just about hijab, not just about a piece of cloth.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-bBHpJ9_KI&t=48m15s
"The hijab is just, it's the physical representation. So when we see a slave in chains we know that it's not specifically the chains that are making this person a slave. Do you know what I mean? But when you remove the chains, then there is an opportunity for that slave to be free.
So that's exactly how I look at the hijab, that's exactly how most women, most Muslim women, most ex-Muslim women who are trying to get themselves out of the hijab, that's how we look at it.
We look at it as, remove this thing off of your head and allow your head to be free, and the next step will be allowing your mind to be free. Because if they control what goes on your head, they are controlling what goes on in your head, and I have seen this happen time and time and time and time again, of women who finally have the strength to decide what they're gonna put on their own bodies and they deal with the backlash, they deal with their families, they deal with their friends, they deal with their community, they deal with their people at school, and they're like "no this is what I'm doing."
And once you've done that you have overcome a mountain. And then you can after that say "oh and also I'm not gonna marry that man that you told me to marry" and "also [..] I am gonna go to the school that you're telling me I'm not allowed to go to school" or, etc, etc, etc.
So when I fight against the hijab, that's really what I'm fighting for. I'm fighting for women to decide for themselves what they want for their lives and that first step is deciding what to put on your bodies."
-- Yasmin Mohammed
Let me offer a visual aid.
Tumblr media
If the horse realizes it doesn't need to be limited by the chair, it can then go wherever it pleases. But it's standing there, unable to go anywhere, because it believes it's limited by the chair. If you left this horse here, how long would it take to figure it out? Would it die of starvation and thirst not knowing that it wasn't beholden to the chair?
And why would we be okay with that?
64 notes · View notes
dee6000 · 3 years
Text
LoSlavery Is Not OUR "Original Sin" The thick lines show majority of African slaves went to Spain’s (they started trans-Atlantic slave trade) Latin American & Caribbean slave colonies, Muslim and African Countries. Few went to colony that became the US
Tumblr media
How many times have you heard that slavery was “America’s original sin”? I’m not quite sure what that means, but I think the idea is that slavery was a uniquely horrible thing that defines the United States and will stain whites forever. It’s one of the few things Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and Barack Obama agree on. There are books about it. Here’s a college course at UC Davis called “Slavery: America’s Original Sin: Part 1."
The fact is, there has been slavery in every period of history, and just about everywhere. The Greeks and Romans had it, the ancient Egyptians had it, it’s all over the Bible, the Chinese and the pre-Columbian Indians had it, the Maoris in New Zealand had it, and the Muslims had it in spades. But I have never, ever heard of slavery being anyone else’s “original sin.”
About the only societies that never had slaves were primitivehunter-gatherers. As soon as people have some kind of formal social organization, they start taking slaves.
You’ve heard about slavery and mass human sacrifices of Central and South American Indians, but North American Indians were enslaving each other long before the white man showed up.
Tlingit and Haida Indians, who lived in the Pacific Northwest, went raiding for slaves as far South as California. About one quarter of the population were slaves, and the children of slaves were slaves. During potlatches, or huge ceremonial feasts, the Tlingit would sometimes burn property and kill slaves, just to show how rich they were. What’s a couple of slaves to a guy who lives in a house like this?
When we bought Alaska from the Russians in 1867, Indians were furious when we told them they had to give up their slaves. The Tlingit carved this image of Abraham Lincoln, the emancipator, to try to shame the government into compensating them for slaves.
What were called the Five Civilized Tribes of the American Southeast happily bought black slaves. In 1860, there were 21,000 Cherokee, and they owned 4,000 slaves. And that was just the Cherokee. Many took their slaves with them when they were forced to move West.
Free blacks in the South owned slaves. The fact of having been slaves didn’t stop them from wanting to be slave masters themselves. In 1840, in South Carolina alone, there were 454 free blacks who owned a total of 2,357 slaves. Only about 20 percent of Southern households had even one slave, but 75 percent of the free-black households in South Carolina owned slaves.
Tumblr media
Tumblr media
Don’t believe me? It’s all in this book by the expert on the subject, Larry Koger of the University of South Carolina. And he demolishes the idea that most blacks bought slaves only to get family members out of slavery. Like whites, some were kind masters and some were mean, but, for the most part, they owned slaves for exactly the same reasons whites did.
Tumblr media
There’s a whole book about this black guy, Andrew Durnford.
He had a plantation of 672 acres along the Mississippi in Louisiana, and close to 100 slaves. Another black slave owner in Louisiana, P.C. Richards, owned 152 slaves. Black slaveowners avidly supported the Confederacy. There are no accurate estimates of the number of slaves held by free blacks at the time of the Civil War, but they would have been tens of thousands.
If slavery is somebody’s Original Sin, it’s sure not ours. Take a look at this map of the slave trade, beginning in 1500.
Tumblr media
[Source: SlaveVoyages.com, click to enlarge]
The thicknesses of the lines represent numbers of slaves. What became the United States imported just around 400,000 slaves—about 3 percent of all the slaves who crossed the Atlantic. Look at all the slaves who went to Brazil and to the Caribbean Islands.They needed millions because, unlike American slaveowners who raised slave families, they bought grown men and worked them to death. And let us not forget, virtually every slave on this map was caught by blacks or Arabs.
And look at all the slaves who ended up in North Africa and the Middle East.
That’s millions of them going to Muslim countries at exactly the same time slaves were crossing the Atlantic. And Arabs had been taking black slaves out of Africa, across the Sahara, for 900 years before America was even discovered—and a forced march across the desert was a lot worse than crossing the Atlantic. In this article about Africa’s first slavers—the Arabs—historian Paul Lovejoy estimates that over the centuries, Muslims took about 14 million blacks out of Africa [Recalling Africa’s harrowing tale of its first slavers – The Arabs – as UK Slave Trade Abolition is commemorated, March 27, 2018]. That is more than the 12 million who went to the New World.
And you might ask, where are the descendants of all those Middle Eastern slaves? America has millions of slave descendants. Why don’t you see lots of blacks in Saudi Arabia or Syria or Iraq? Arabs castrated black slaves so they wouldn’t have descendants.
Tumblr media
Muslims were even more enthusiastic about enslaving white people. Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters, by Prof. Robert C. Davis is the best book on the subject. Remember the Barbary Pirates of North Africa? Between 1530 and 1780 they caught and enslaved more than a million white, European Christians. During the 16th and 17th centuries, Arabs took more white slaves south across the Mediterranean than there were blacks shipped across the Atlantic.
Mostly, Muslim pirates captured European ships and stole their crews. In just three years, from 1606 to 1609, the British navy admitted it had lost 466 British merchant ships to North African pirates [Counting European Slaves on the Barbary Coast Past & Present, August 2001]. Four hundred sixty-six ships in just three years. Arabs took American slaves. Between 1785 and 1793 Algerians captured 13 American ships in the Mediterranean and enslaved the crews. This is a 1804 battle between Arab pirates and the USS Enterprise.
Tumblr media
It was only in 1815, after two wars, that the United States was finally free of the Barbary pirates.
Muslim pirates also organized huge, amphibious slave-catching assaults that practically depopulated the Italian coast. In 1544, Algerian raiders took 7,000 slaves in the Bay of Naples in a single raid. This drove the price of slaves so low it was said you could “swap a Christian for an onion.”
After a 1566 raid on Granada in Spain netted 4,000 men women, and children, it was said to be “raining Christians in Algiers.” Women were easier to catch than men, and were prized as sex slaves, so some coastal areas lost their entire child-bearing populations. One raid as far away as Iceland brought back 400 white slaves.
Prof. Davis notes that the trade in black Africans was strictly business, but Muslims had a jihad-like enthusiasm for stealing Christians. It was revenge for the Crusades and for the reconquest of Spain from the Arabs in 1492. When Muslim corsairs raided Europe, they made a point of desecrating churches and stealing church bells. The metal was valuable but stealing church bells silenced the voice of Christianity.
It was a tradition to parade newly captured Europeans through the streets so people could jeer at them, while children threw garbage at them. At the slave market, both men and women were stripped naked to evaluate their sexual value. In the North African capitals—Tunis, Algiers, Tripoli—there was a big demand for homosexual sex-slaves. Other Europeans were worked to death on farms or building projects.
Prof. Davis writes that unlike in North America, there were no limits on cruelty: “There was no countervailing force to protect the slave from his master’s violence: no local anti-cruelty laws, no benign public opinion, and rarely any effective pressure from foreign states.” Slaves were not just property, they were infidels, and deserved whatever suffering a master meted out.
For a man, there was a fate even worse than being a sex slave. Hundreds of thousands became galley slaves, often on slave-catching pirate ships. They were chained to their oars 24 hours a day, and could move only to the hole where the oar went through the hull—so they could relieve themselves. If the men were rowing, they fouled themselves. Galley slaves lived in a horrible stench, ate rotten food, were whipped by slave drivers and tormented by rats and lice. They could not lie down and had to sleep at their oars. Many never left their ships, even in port. Their job was to row until they died, and to be tossed overboard at the first sign of weakness.
Muslims have taken slaves for as long as there have been Muslims, which is about 1,400 years.
Tumblr media
Mohammed himself was an enthusiastic slave trader. Muslims still take black slaves. As this article points out, Libya still has slave markets, Mauritanian Arabs take black slaves, and there is still slavery in Niger, Mali, Chad and Sudan[Libya’s slave markets are a reminder that the exploitation of Africans never went away, by Martin Plaut, New Statesman, February 21, 2018].
And, of course, it was white people who abolished slavery, both in their own countries and, except for a few stubborn holdouts, the whole world. Africans, just like the Tlingit Indians, screamed about all the wealth we made them give up.
But slavery’s still our “original sin.” As Time magazine wrote just this month about slavery “Europeans and their colonial “descendants” in the United States engineered the most complete and enduring dehumanization of a people in history."[Facing America's History of Racism Requires Facing the Origins of 'Race' as a Concept, by Andrew Curran, July 10, 2020]
What a small minority of Americans did for 246 years—and in a relatively mild form—is worse than anything that was ever done anywhere by anyone.
That, ladies and gentlemen, is the power of white privilege. I hope you are enjoying it. Watch this video:
youtube
51 notes · View notes
starlightervarda · 3 years
Note
What is exactly an Arab ? Is it an ethnicity, an identity or something else ? I have never understood what it refers to and it’s pretty confusing. One of my mom’s friend is Lebanese and Christian and she told me to never call him an Arab so how does ethnicity works in MENA countries ?
Hi nonny <3
Okay, I’m on a lot of painkillers and this is a very complex topic but I’ll try to be as coherent as possible
1. ‘Arab’, at it’s core, means someone from the Arabian Peninsula. Whether you include those from the Levant or Mesopotamia depends. Some identify as Arabs in a general sense, a political sense or they just don’t think too much about it and specify that they’re —insert nationality— first.
But for ages it has been used as a blanket term for anyone from a country that speaks Arabic, it persists in the term Arab World, which is really more like Anglosphere (countries that speak English) or La Francophonie (countries that speak French) more than it is ethnic.
But that it’s facing a lot of pushback because it’s erasing the ethnicities, cultures, dialects and histories of many people. Hence why MENA (Middle East / North Africa) is being used more. It makes a point that you can be an Arabophone but not an Arab and that not everyone in the Middle East is an Arab or even speaks Arabic.
While many don’t really notice or mind being called such, I’m going to list the reasons why many others object to it.
To sum up in MENA countries, you can split people up into:
1. Egyptians (Most populous, both ME and NA but not Maghrebien) 2. Levantines (From Syria to Jordan) 3. Maghrebien (Western North Africa. Not ME.) 4. Khaleejis (Gulf Arabs) 5. Mesopotamians (Mostly Iraqis) 6. Persians 7. Turks

There’s like dozens of other sub-subgroups and smaller ethnicities and a bunch of religious sects within Islam and Christianity.
2.  It can be political a lot of the time. Before the 20th Century and the fall of the Ottoman Empire and the British getting involved, a lot of countries weren’t really there? A lot are like 200 yrs old, or younger? Or underwent drastic change? So, identity is a confused and recent thing in some places? As people no-longer associated with the French or British or Turks they want to have a larger connection, so it became language and culture.
The past couple of decades with the rise in religious conservatism where people associate being a ‘proper Muslim’ with being ‘an Arab’ and this mindset shows a lot in deeply religious people who disown their ancestors and identify more with Saudi Arabia because they think it makes them better or more devout. Mostly the product of Salafism and Wahabism which has infested MENA countries in the past century. (This is why Sunni vs Shi’ite conflicts are framed as Saudi vs Iran even if they’re in Iraq)
(Also, Arab racism towards North Africans & Africans in general is a big issue that creates self-hate and rejection, so some people in will want to shirk that association by saying that they’re actually Arabs when they’re mostly not. Not even genetically. Arab supremacists are a big problem.)
Lots of Arabophones living abroad might identify as Arabs because that’s what people in those countries already labeled them and they went along with it. Or it’s easier than having to explain to everyone you speak to the details of a region they, 90% of the time, don’t know anything about. ‘You have an Arabic name, are you an Arab?’ ‘Sure’.
But again, I feel like that’s being phased out in favour of ‘Middle Eastern’ or on a broader scale, MENA, because people got tired of being mislabeled.
3. Some lands have dialects that barely count as Arabic anymore. There is almost a language barrier between, say, Moroccans and Iraqis.
Most would not be able to communicate easily or at all without switching to a second language, because not everyone knows Modern Standard Arabic well enough to keep thinking in it. Lots of countries now publish work in their dialects or even just in French. Plenty of regional websites are entirely in English for maximum reach.
Or the understanding can be one-way, one understands and the other party is just ??? Parlez français, s’il vous plaît??? Speak English, please???
They sound really different, and it’s not just accent. Words change meaning or are replaced in use, and the sentence structure/word order can be jumbled, and letters are pronounced differently. Sentences as basic as ‘Hi, how are you? What are you doing today?’ can be drastically different.
Off the top of my head, How are you? can be said as Keifak / Akhbarak / Shlonak / Labas / Ezayak. In MSA it’s Keif Halak.
Really, after all the ‘We’re all the same we’re all brothers and a win for you is a win for me’ talk, if you put a person from each country in a room together it’d be chaotic. Not just because of dialect but because a lot just don’t like each other. Some don’t even like their own neighbours or compatriots. Some have even gone to war or had conflicts they’re still mad about and don’t want to be lumped together.
There are groups that will only tolerate each other abroad, when they have no compatriots to connect with, as a ‘I’m homesick and you’re close enough’ thing.
Also, some people straight up don’t speak Arabic like Persians and Turks, or have their own languages like the Amazigh, Kurds and Assyrians. 

4. Many people see being labeled Arabs as their lineage being discredited, it doesn’t help that people have to deal with Western conspiracy theorists discrediting their existence as ~Arab invaders who aren’t actually descendants of their ancestors’ civilizations~ or just refusing to learn the difference between them all. 

All the ‘We don’t know what the Phoenicians/Numidians/Egyptians/Sumerians/Persians really looked like’ bullshit. Yes, we do. The descendants are still here, and it’s been proven via genetics and reconstructions of skeletons and mummies many times. They look like the statues and paintings and reliefs they left behind. Interesting how no one ever asks what the Romans and Vikings looked like and questions if their descendants are legitimate…

Then they take our stuff and put it in their museums :))) and refuse to cast us in movies and shows made about our ancestors :))))))))
5. All this conflict is why the term MENA is becoming more prevalent, because a lot of us were colonized by Arabs, had our original cultures and languages broken down and replaced or were treated as inferior and are still looked down on to this day.
It’s more testy if you’re not a Muslim, because then your people pre-date Islam and Arabic as a lingua franca, and resent it for it making you a minority in your own land.

This is probably why your friend’s mum got angry about you calling him an Arab. A lot of Levantines do identify as Arabs, but plenty don’t for cultural, religious or historical reasons, and because they were originally Phoenicians, Canaanites, etc. with their own history before the Arab Conquest. (Palestinian friend of mine calls himself a Canaanite lmao)
6. Generally, there are distinct sub-groups in MENA countries that we use to identify ourselves and each other, but even among those, each country has its own ethnicities in the mix like Bedouins, all types of Amazigh, Circassians, Saïdis, Nubians, Turkmen, Yazidis, Assyrians, Armenians, Kurds, etc., etc.
Really, God knows how many ethnicities there are in Iran and Iraq alone.
7. It’s just best to ask the person you’re talking to how they feel, and not argue with them about it. It might not make a difference to some, but it’s a big deal to others.
I had a Kurdish best friend who would bite your head off if you called her an Arab. She didn’t even speak Arabic, but Kurdish, which is closer to Persian. Her family celebrated Nowruz and everything, but her passport said Iraqi. Even that she had a problem with.
Same goes for my Moroccan friend who, like most in her area, mostly speaks French and derja, can barley understand Modern Standard Arabic (or most Arabs in general), and half her family are Amazigh who don’t even speak derja. 
On the other side, I have an Iraqi friend who hates Kurds but grudgingly identifies as an Arab. Might be more because he’s a Shi’ite and on-principle doesn’t like Gulf Arabs either.
My grandma used to live and work in Saudi and has many close friends from there, but she will get offended if you tell her she’s an Arab because she’s just not. My parents will get annoyed or even angry, so will a huge amount of other North Africans. 
Even if they're from the Arabian Peninsula, distinction is important. Levantines are very distinct from Khaleejis so are Mesopotamians. There are even widespread memes on the Arabic side of the internet about how different we sound and look. My favourite is the pictures of guys captioned with “How did you know I was Iraqi?” or dumb shit like “What’s a Lebanese man’s favourite footwear? Shou!”
To be brief, it’s not nearly as homogeneous as people think it is. A lot of us are different on a fundamental level due to history, culture, environment, dialect, religion and sects, what parts of religion we accept or reject, etc. We still generally have a lot in common and a shared heritage going back millennia and cultural exchange that’s going on til this day, but we’re not identical.
TL;DR Not everyone the Middle East is an Arab. North Africans aren’t Arabs, neither are Persians and Turks. Not all Arabs are Muslim. Not all Muslims are Sunni. MENA Christians exist. Region, history, dialect and culture make a huge difference.
65 notes · View notes
newluddite · 3 years
Text
Other places like the Taliban
The western world is in shock and disappointment about the fall of Afghanistan. The Taliban are going to invoke Sharia law and many people are very afraid.
I would like to step back and remind you that there are many other countries with Sharia Law and they are the West's "Friends." Saudi Arabia is western aligned but if you are a woman you may only go out in public with a male relative supervising and under a dark cloak. The things women fear in Afghanistan are the normal routine in Saudi Arabia.
The ruler, who is an appointed prince, is trying to project a liberal face and will allow women to drive cars and perhaps even travel without permission of a male relative. However the woman who campaigned for that right is in prison under torture including sexual assault as punishment for starting the whole thing. They will not let her out until she agrees to state she was not tortured and apologizes.
They execute people there by cutting their head off with swords. Welcome to the 14th century!
In Dubai and the Arab Emirates it is similar. Those countries are trying to exploit tourism and will tolerate visiting women not covering their whole bodies, just most of them. It is far more liberal, but if a woman gets raped and reports it, she will be arrested for having sex with someone not their husband. The rapist may get a fine. At least that is what happened last year.
A little country called Brunei is ruled by a Sultan and he makes the Saudis look like nice teddy bears. In 2014 he altered the law to impose the death penalty (by stoning) for adultery, sodomy, rape, apostasy, blasphemy, and insulting Islam. So if a woman is raped she gets stoned for adultery, but at least her rapist gets stoned too. A gay person should just as well head for the execution ground as soon as they get off the plane.
If an evangelical Christian visits and does a podcast saying how nasty Islam is well they get stoned too. Oh to be clear we are talking about rocks throw at you until you are dead not medical marijuana.
Oh all those places are considered friendly and even allies of the West. You can visit if you want. Just do not cross them.
Oh lets add Turkey to the list. They are currently ruled by a reactionary conservative who suppresses opposition and wants to bring Sharia law into a place that has been fairly modern liberal democratic and secular until a few years ago.
I am not saying Sharia is evil in itself. It is basically the same rules that evangelical Christians would impose on the US if they ever came to power. You know an Eye for an Eye type stuff. Religion is a really poor place to start for justice or ironically mercy. Evangelicals are just like the Taliban but better dressed usually.
What is really tragic is that these people had a taste of life without religious extremism. As do the Arabs who travel overseas and see how we live in our countries.
8 notes · View notes