lol imagine an avior and starlight audio set in the format of when sunshine was running from blake but instead of "you are my sunshine" in the background its "dream a little dream of me"
26 notes
·
View notes
i've known you all this time, and always wanted to ask:
how did you make
THE BUTTON?
and what was it supposed to do? 0_0
(ps: i feel kinda weird sending an ask to someone who already answered one. like i have one ask token per person, and am only allowed to use it once)
Basically I looked on the “advanced settings” on my tumblr dashboard editor, where you can literally edit the code of the website, then copied and pasted code for a button and changed around a few variables to make it big and red - however, it can’t be clicked??? Which is weird, because when I’m editing the code, it is clickable, and does what it’s supposed to (which is a secret (I couldn’t figure out how to make it do stuff)) but when I’m on the actual website it does nothing
Maybe one day I’ll get around to fixing it but I don’t know enough about [INSERT LANGUAGE TUMBLR USES HERE] to bugfix it
7 notes
·
View notes
Global warming is wild isn't it? I mean? Warm and salty raindrops 24/7? specifically in Soho???
(I physically can't draw angst sorry I did my best here)
39K notes
·
View notes
What if I re-paint my own painting, but like, not pixel this time, it would be fun
4K notes
·
View notes
green amongus with a god complex gives him a trident. this is so exile
23 notes
·
View notes
I’m hardly the first person to compare them but Terry Pratchett and J K Rowling really are polar opposites in terms of the way their writing treats weird characters. In Rowling’s writing, any weirdness is there to be laughed at (for example: Professor Trelawney, the fake seer who doesn’t know she’s an actual seer). In Pratchett’s writing, though, the characters’ weirdness is taken 100% seriously and the humor arises organically from the situation itself and is never at the characters’ expense (for example: in Making Money, the man who was born a clown and was never told so until he was 13 years old). In Rowling’s writing, the main characters poke constant fun at Professor Trelawney, making joke predictions and fudging homework and talking about how divination isn’t a legitimate field of study. Even after she gets fired and more or less drops the act, the joke changes to “look at this sad drunk lady” and the main characters express little sympathy. The narrative is saying she’s there to make one real prediction and otherwise she’s only there for comic relief. This sort of thing happens over and over in Rowling’s writing, where any quirkiness is there to be laughed at and the misfortunes of characters we’re not supposed to like are supposed to be funny, and it sends a message of conformity under threat of ridicule. In Pratchett’s writing, the clown man’s story is treated as a great tragedy: imagine growing up not knowing why you are the way you are, and then finding out the truth as a teenager! And knowing that your own mother kept the truth from you! This man was so deeply traumatized by this he denied himself any humor or fun for decades, and when he has a crisis and runs off to become a clown again, he is given support and medical treatment and is welcomed back to his job at the bank and accepted for who he is. The fact that this whole situation is hilarious is secondary. And again, this sort of thing happens over and over again in Pratchett’s writing, where characters’ quirkiness is embraced and often seen as irreplaceable by the end of the book, and it sends a message that our quirks are valuable and weirdness should be acceptable. It just strikes me as a much… kinder approach to people, you know?
13K notes
·
View notes