these violent delights is actually kind of ruining my life because i’ve never read something that portrays a characters self hatred so thoroughly and unavoidably and entirely Needlessly. it’s tearing me apart if i’m being quite honest

HEY NOW...

aw thanks anon!! i did post my gif resources a while ago but i can post an updated one of these soon and include some psds! my gifs really aren't that good tho anon — if i'm being honest, i don't really spend that much time on colouring like i could — so if you can find someone PROPERLY good (usually a film/tv blog, as you can imagine) they may have really expert tips 🤔

as someone who has been at the ugliest end of reddit & discord tv/britcom fans' trolldom (too nice a word, really), and lived through the fucking unending years-long era of that one incel's rule over the panel show subreddit, i understand the reticence to participate in those spaces — even though, these days, they're mostly pleasant enough and subs that supply downloads (tv_bunny is life) are more or less transactional. that said, the purpose of this blog has always been to service the people who can't or don't torrent — who a lot of reddit & discord tv/britcom fans don't have the patience for, but i digress — so it doesn't bother me that a lot of my followers don't know reddit as well as i do. no worries!

omg! recently i watched after life (i love kerry godliman!!!!!!!), dara ó briain's new special, and i've also been doing my biannual re-listen of the entire horne section podcast because it is so fucking impeccable chef's kiss! i was catching up on guessable but it's really, deeply, truly mid, so i kinda gave up for a while and switched over to breeders (martin freeman agenda continues). otherwise non-panel show things, some films like close, return to dust, un beau matin, etc. — but that's for my main hehe i'm someone who wishes i could watch 10000 things in one day T_T

hahaha i do get asked this a lot!!! like you there's just so. many. and i often chicken out of substantially answering this because if i forget anyone i'll kick myself SO hard later

but

back in the day i answered a similar question about some non-comedians i want to see on taskmaster AND I SAID AMELIA DIMOLDENBERG AND IT CAME TRUE

LIKE

MY BRAIN 🧠🧠🧠🧠🧠🧠

SO MAYBE I CAN MANIFEST THINGS LET'S TRY 🔮🔮🔮🔮🔮🔮🔮

this is personal to me, of course, and i'm considering people i really love + who i think would be really fun specifically on taskmaster, so in a somewhat priority order...

robert webb

stephen mangan

robert irwin

martin freeman

catherine tate

jessica hynes

miles jupp

simon amstell (preferably on the same season as jessica hynes because about 15 years ago (literally) i used to watch this clip religiously, and i'm sure that has something very specific to say about why i am the way i am but we don't have time to psychoanalyse me rn)

larry dean

ed byrne

holly walsh

diane morgan

daniel radcliffe

charlie brooker

hugh laurie

susie dent (omg i was CACKLING at susie, who is never on panel shows(!!!), being on the same episode of guessable as nick helm — and now i kinda wanna see her on the same series of tm as nick helm muhahaha)

kayvan novak

limmy

paul foot

bill bailey

lawrence chaney (i also love the vivienne of course! but i think lawrence may be more fit for tm while the vivenne is more fit for something like celeb juice; btw just watched her on guessable with ivo graham, and ivo calling her "viv"...omg...it did something to me...it really did...again, we're not talking about why i am the way i am)

vic reeves

the sexted boys

some other randoms people i'd certainly be happy to see, even if they don't make the priority manifesting roster — ahir shah, adam buxton, danny dyer, jimmy carr, graham norton, matt berry, glenn moore, maggie aderin-pocock, gary delaney, hal cruttenden, rhys james, huge davies, josie long, alasdair beckett-king, gino d'acampo, julian barrett, and tonsss of actors but we'd be here all day

i don't think there are many people i vehemently do not want to see on the show. while there are of course a few comedians i just don't like, and if taskmaster puts another tory politician on the panel again i'll fucking write in with my upset, the disappointment i typically feel if and when i see a new lineup is more along the lines of "meh they're fine but they took the place of someone i'd much rather see". but tm is also so good at introducing us to people we may not have seen much of before — and then we love them, so i trust the producers and alex a lot!

🔮 MANIFESTING MANIFESTING MANIFESTING MANIFESTING MANIFESTING MANIFESTING MANIFESTING 🔮

—

WATCH LINKS MASTERPOST / FAQ / TAGS / ASK

Personally I wish that Mateo and Paul, especially Paul, have some more screen time but also just give us more of them. Why didn’t Paul or Mateo say anything during the intervention? Maybe because they didn’t want to offend Owen? Idk just a guess but i just am kind of over those two getting little to nothing if this makes sense. Marjan, too, but she gets a little bit more than them. Story wise, dialogue wise and most of everything else. Mateo had more screen time this week which I loved because he’s great, too and I’m glad we got to see a little bit more of his life outside of work. But they said nothing in the intervention and also they literally barely ever show Mateo doing anything on calls. Like where is he lol is he still a probie? How long does that last maybe I’m dumb as missed some part of that probie storyline and if I did my bad excuse this part lol but if I didn’t then???? And Paul was gonna climb the ladder in the last episode but Owen was like nah I can do it. Why not let Paul do it????? I know this is silly because some scenes are purposely structured to show how Owen and others like TK or someone else will react and move their storylines forward but this is getting kind of annoying. Does this make sense? Why create all of these diverse and interesting characters with so much potential and literally do almost nothing with them. Seriously I know we are just scratching the surface with Mateo and Paul and Marjan. We are lucky to be getting this much Grace and Judd, especially Grace with the car crash plot line because before we didn’t get much Grace aside from short calls either. I just want more and I know we’re slowly getting it but this is so annoying to see some of these characters being wasted and ignored for the most part

hi! yeah, I would love more screentime for that little trio - the actors have obviously put a lot of work into building that dynamic and I love it so much - now give us more @ lone star!! however, something that @howtosingit noted here about the screen time is that the ‘top 3s′ are almost exactly following billing order currently. its worth remembering that Brian, Natacha and Julian are lower billed actors, they are not going to have the same amount of screen time as Rob, Gina and Ronen. (personally I think its sus that Gina is lower than where she should be for that but I guess theres still time before the end of the season) of course we will always like to have more of the characters that aren’t Owen, but realistically the order does reflect the industry convention of how billing relates to screentime.

as for their dialogue during the intervention, i think it kinda does make sense  why they didn’t speak much:

a, Marjan and Paul don’t really have personal experience of seeing Owen off the rails, they’ve only really heard it second-hand from Mateo - Paul, Mr Observational, says during the rescue for the kid on the roof that he can’t notice anything apparently wrong with Owen and Marjan was obviously very underprepared for being asked to speak.

b, Owen kind of derailed the intervention before they got around to everyone being able to speak, so Mateo wasn’t able to properly give his thoughts.

(btw Mateo is no longer on probation, he passed his exam during s1 but I suspect he’ll always be probie to the firefam, it’s more an affectionate nickname than an indicator of his experience. he’ll probably still be probie until they get a new probationer, which might be a long time away skjdgjk)

I completely get your frustration at the lack of exploration of these really interesting characters, especially for the benefit of white male characters. I would love for them to really tap into the potential they have and understand that that would create a far more engaging show, as well as a more inclusive one. I have to admit though, this episode was not actually one that fuelled that frustration for me. I actually enjoyed owen’s storyline in this and I think it incorporated the other characters really well and also allowed them a couple subplots of their own.

I don't mind them using Owen as the main character when they give him interesting plots that actually develop his character - in the past, he’s been frustrating to see on screen because the narrative framing validated everything he did rather than challenging him, and so it became far more preferable to have him offscreen. I thought Owen taking over from Paul was quite interesting - it was a parallel to 1.04 when Owen went into the collapsed house instead of TK, and he did it for the same reason - to feel powerful after being confronted with his flaws. in 1.04 it was being faced with a man potentially losing his son reminding Owen of his own mortality, and this ep it was the team discussing his mental health over the radio. the reason why I liked this episode way more is the framing. 1.04 framed Owen as this hero, doing good things for other people and didnt really address why it was a stupid thing to do. 2x10 shows Owen as avoiding his problems by doing things that make him seem heroic but actually are just a symptom of his issues, especially when he started telling a child all about his problems go to therapy Owen istg.

but yeah, you make total sense. as much as I understand that the way the show works is a reflection of industry standards and conventions, doesn’t mean we have to like it or accept it as good enough. Im sure the fact that Carlos, grace, Paul, Mateo and Marjan are characters of colour is part of why the producers dont give them as much attention - film and tv production is built on the same racist structures that the rest of American society is (and like, the rest of the western world especially the uk, but trying to stay on track here) and lone star is not free from that. the fact that they have these characters is awesome, but now they need to use them properly and fairly.

idk if this reply really makes sense, but basically, yeah, we’d like more Mateo, Marjan and Paul and when we have to have the Owen plots, make them actually mean something for the character. 

what is popping, home - slices?   if you’ve been in the group chat—then you are aware of my wee identity crisis :     involving the dropping of three, picking up of one.   don’t worry, they’ll be back!   whenever i feel alive again.   SO NEVER.   jk.   anyway…   in the meantime, with the exception of odette and julian—i offer you my trashiest child  (found in the dumpster behind burger king wrapped in tinfoil.   * australian accent *  think they were gonna throw her on the barbie…   huh?)   so, SEE BELOW for the 411 on this 4′11 gremlin.

INTRODUCTION.

☢     —     (  KATIE DOUGLAS, AGENDER, SHE/THEM  )     Trading in their tattoo gun for a chainsaw might not come easy for MINOO PEARCE. This twenty-two year old artist brings spray cans galore, divergent thinking, and a history of shoplifting to the table … but their small stature and double-dealing could drag the group down. And while their unorthodox nature might raise group morale, their arrogance might give them a few enemies. That’s the last thing anyone needs right now. Hopefully, in the apocalypse movie that’s now their life, this QUINCY PUNK will make it to the end credits.

BASICS.

born in boston, massachussets—or as i like to call it…   massachuchu—minoo is the first and only child of two garbage folk.   mitch & rachel pearce.   devout catholics.   patriotic.   all - american.   thoroughly unfit to be parents.   only in a sexy  “our daughter isn’t her own person but an extension of ourselves”  kinda way.   slammed like a ping pong ball between being invisible and controlled this one.

a military brat, too…   meaning that no place was permanent, and boston was ditched before she could take her first step.   she has lived in boise, in a small fishing town south of anchorage, and once her family spent six months in waipahu.   when she was thirteen her father got a permanent position in fort elms.   lucky she!

during the flashes of love and pampering  (see: no autonomy)  minoo was subjected to the cringe - worthy world of child pageantry.   we love it when mommy lives vicariously through us!   even if she aims for jonbenet ramsey…   ending up with honey boo boo instead.   don’t get it twisted, though—she was little miss texas during her prime  (age 8).   AND WE DO NOT TALK ABOUT THAT.   not unless you wanna get shanked   * stabby motions *   …   side note :     she still fits into her last puffy - armed dress.   we don’t talk about that either.

she eventually learned to put her foot down.   much to rachel’s horror.   sorry not sorry, darling.   minoo abandoned the gowns for band tees soon after.   not as much as a speck of rogue on this honey - pie these days, just some sick, sick raccoon eyes.   call it what it is…   punk rock.

minoo first found her greatest passions  (shoplifting and vandalism.   not necessarily in that order.)  when she was eleven years old.   she pocketed a strawberry scented hello kitty eraser from macy’s and she has not looked back since.   a habit which earned her a trip to boarding school.   catholic.   gag us with a spoon.   side note 2 :     she still fits into her middle school uniform, too.

all jokes—they’re not jokes—aside…   she is not completely hopeless.   in fact, she is a little miss smarty - pants.   minoo got a raging hard - on for classic literature  (jane austen, what’s good?)  and conceptual art  (richard hambleton, what’s good?).   not much of a writer but one hell of a graffiti artist—most of her work can be spotted around town.   some genuine, some dicks.   TALENT!   a good portion of her art can be found on mj herself, though.   stick ‘n pokes, babes—we love to see it. 

minoo is also a mother.   she has a son.   and he’s a really good boy.   almost bigger than she is now…   they grow up so fast, don’t they?   his name is rusty, and he’s the cutest saint bernard you ever did see.   her best friend.   her only friend, really.   intended to be a guard dog, my boy rusty flopped—onto the couch that is.   he is a certified couch potato, something minoo can relate to.   AND SHE LOVES HIM SO!   the only person she’d put before herself.   dog - person…   

once intended to get her license.   that opportunity was shot when she chose teenage rebellion over independence.   you see, mj here has got herself a rap sheet longer than herself.   (not that impressive all things considered.)   and she takes much pride in it.   which means that when daddy dearest tried to have her late teen mishaps expunged—she saw red.   psychological help, i’ll get her some.   now she’s twenty - two and destined to travel the world by skateboard…   all because she backed the family jeep into their neighbour’s backyard.   nobody was hurt, alright.   dare i say yet?

SPEED RUN!     got nancy spungen for a role model.   saving up to run off to sacramento.   hates authority yet somehow has an authority kink.   adhd embodied.   looks like the artwork of numerous kindergarteners.   thinks attention is love.   homeless by choice (nobody said she was smart…   except i did.)  could eat her weight in olives.   anarchist without a cause.   10/10 will break into your house.   took fuck the police too literally that one time.   fantasises about her dad’s suicide.   wants to be loved.   does not want to love.

WANTED CONNECTIONS

friend - o’s :    i think it goes without saying that minoo is a handful.   although i still think she should be allowed some buds.   whether through her MANY INTERESTS  (literature, art, punk rock, skating, large dogs, disappointing her parents…)  or just through circumstance.   she is twenty - two, and never made it to art school—*  that one vine vc *   way to go, paul mitch!—but she did go to fort elms high all four years.   someone’s bound to know her!   just give me some bitches to put up with her shit.   god bless america.

parental figure :    listen…   she needs this.   obviously!   just some OLD PERSON who doesn’t tell her that she stinks and that her tattoos are ugly.   she has a lifetime of trauma to make up for.   we need some rachel and mitch opposites to fix that shit, alright.   and stat!   she intends on being dead by twenty - seven.   cobain hasn’t even bit it yet, and still…   she’s so ahead of her time…

enemy slash victim :    she stinks.   (yes, this is her dad speaking.)   and is a complete fucking nuisance.   if she decides you suck then she wont settle for simply knowing herself—you also have to know.   really know…   it’s no fun hating somebody if they don’t know it, man.   just let her pull some cutesy pranks, you know?   ordering half a dozen pizzas to their house, leave their number in the x - rated section of blockbuster, graffiti an ugly portrait of their ugly face on their driveway, slash their tires…

and that’s it, fellas!   please love her…   or else…   :gun_emoji:

IT HAS BEEN about a year now since my involvement with the Dozier School For Boys began taking over my world. Kicking off the whirlwind was my need to get my hands on the school’s student ledgers. I won’t rehash the entire adventure but what I will say is that it took many frustrating nights online, several emails to the Archivist, the potential of an $600+ bill to get digital copies & finally an 8 hour round trip before I’d actually have what I wanted…Well at least a quarter of what I wanted!

  HAVING ABSOLUTELY NO clue what I was looking for, I spent the next several weeks trying to organize what I had. Almost immediately number of very distinct patterns began jumping out at me. The same sentencing judges over & over again, the SAME sentence length OR lack there of & a crap load of blank spaces; Specifically under the “WHEN/HOW RELEASED” columns. One would expect that any institution handling children would be required to keep detailed & accurate records of ALL of its charges, especially when it comes to their last known whereabouts BUT that would make too much sense, now wouldn’t it…

        THE INFO THAT I had gotten was only from the latest volume of the ledgers & didn’t even make a dent in the number of boys that had been shoved through the doors to be reformed. I knew there were hundreds OR even thousands of names in those books. I maybe had a few hundred at the most. By now, I had gotten used to what I like to call the “Hurry Up & Stop” method of researching. Basically I’d need specific info, finally get said info ONLY to start looking it over & promptly figure out that I needed additional material OR even worse, I’d need something entirely different altogether. In this case, I had just assumed that I’d eventually be making another trip to the Archives; That is until I ended up becoming involved with Bob Straley & taking over his website…And right there on one of the site pages was a link to the detailed, handwritten notes that WHB Mr. Andrew Puel had spent hours putting together.

Mr. Andrew Puel At The State Archives…Sitting In The EXACT Same Spot That I Did When I Was There!

      NOT IT!!

WHEN I SAW that link, I was beyond thrilled! I was finally going to have something reliable to validate what I had come up with! I had spoken with Andrew at Bob Straley’s memorial service & knew that any research he had done would be the best & most accurate info that I could possibly get. When the page loaded, it definitely did NOT show what I had been hoping for; In all actuality, it showed nothing but this:

    ODDLY THE INFO was missing! I started clicking on some of the other older links on the website & sure enough, there were quite a few that led to nowhere. I don’t know why it gone OR where it went, only that it’s not there. I tried not to get to aggravated, thinking that there had to be a hard copy among the thousands of documents that I have. I spent the next several weeks going through EVERY page, folder, digital file, etc. & found nothing. Bob kept everything, so to say I was puzzled that he wouldn’t have a copy of something so important was a huge understatement. I did another look through, literally taking out every piece of paper, one by one; Still nothing.

  Well Damn….

    AN EVENING IN GAINESVILLE

ON A FRIDAY in late February, I made the 3 hour trip to Gaineville. With me was a small black bag filled with what I believed to be the most important material related to the Arthur G Dozier School for Boys. I pulled up to a beautiful home, tucked back in a quiet sub division that was surrounded by forest. Standing outside was a familiar face, Mr. Bryant Middleton. The “Whitehouse Boy” greeted me with a smile & a brief hug before inviting me inside to meet his wife. Both graciously spent several hours telling their personal story of Dozier & how the WHB’s Organization was founded. They were both lovely people & I was grateful that they had been so willing to meet with me & be as open as they were. When we finally moved into the dining room to look over the things that I had brought, I began pulling things out. I yanked a folder out that had been wedged inside of my over full bag & a stack of papers fell out. The stack was stapled together & folded in half. I picked it up to see what it was & as I unfolded it, my jaw hit the floor!

    OH…MY…GOD…It was a hard copy of the list of missing boys! The same list that I had just spent weeks trying to find! The stuff inside of that bag was the stuff that I pulled out & reviewed quite frequently & there’s absolutely NO way that I would missed that thick stack of ledger pages! I slid the stack across the table, explaining to Bryant why I was a bit stunned at finding them. He thought it was strange as well. I’m not going to get into the specifics of my time with the Middletons in this post, although I will say that I’m very fortunate to have met with them. They’re great people & they continue to work toward keeping the future from repeating the past.

    WHERE COULD THEY BE?

OF COURSE THERE is minimal info on the boys on this list. What is known is that most were listed as escaped but never recovered. A lot lacked permanent homes OR guardians, so there wouldn’t have been any concerned parents wondering about the whereabouts of their lost boy. It should also be noted that the last place they were seen was the Dozier School for Boys in Marianna. That leaves so many unanswered questions; Could ALL 185 boys on that list have actually successfully escaped & moved on to a better life? Even if that did happen, would it be possible that NOT 1 single child ever be heard from again? I suppose it could be possible for some BUT for All 185? I seriously have my doubts & given the history of Dozier, I’d say that’s highly unlikely. Especially considering the significant proof of other burial sites on the school’s 1200+ acres.Whether or not they continued life after Dozier OR their lives were taken at the school, they each deserve to be recognized. I’ll let them speak for themselves….

☆☆☆☆☆☆

  JOSEPH WILK – 17 JAME HENRY COLSON SMITH – 16 BEHARD STEPHENS – 15 JOHNNIE J. RICHARDSON – 17 AB DURDEN – 16 WILLIAM RICHARD WHITE – 16 MONROE ROGERS – 16 NOWLA (SONNY) VENOS – 16 BERNARD WILLIAMS – 15 WILLIAM NICOLAS BURNETT – 15 FRED RUSH – 16 HORACE MECHOM – 16 J.W. HARRILL, JR. – 14 EDWARD MATTHEW MITCHELL – 17 LARRY DAVIS – 14. ALFONSO DEWEY DAVIS – 16 JAMES ARTHUR HARELL – 13 CARROL PITTMAN – 15 CARL HUBBARD REWLS – 14 RICHARD PEUDRY TYLER – 15 HAROLD OLDS – 14 LYNVILLE RAY – 16 LAIRD WILDES (age unknown) ALFRED SMITH GOODSON – 16 QUINCY LEWIS – 16

☆☆☆☆☆☆

ZANE HOPKINS – 12 ROBERT WALKER – 13 WILLIE FRANKLIN FARROW – 13 EUGENE JOHNS – 14 GABE BELL – 15 WILLIAM DEWARS – 15 LELAND LLOYD BRADY – 16 JASPER ALLEN HOLDER – 15 WILLIAM JOHNSON – 16 GEORGE HENRY ABBEY – 16 HARRY L. SAULS – 15 BEN BUNDRICK – 15 LOUIS VALOIS COUTURE – 16 ROBERT GILBERT ALBRITTON – 16 LAUDRIC BASKIN – 17 JAME HENRY COLSON SMITH – 16 JOHN JOSEPH COOGAN, JR – 16 ARINAUDO MACHIN, JR – 16 JULIAN GREEN – 15 CARL UNDERHILL – 16 WILLIAM DANIEL HATCHER – 17 DWIGHT SPRINGER – 14 JASON EDWARD LOGAN – 15 PAUL HERSHEY, JR – 17 CLARENCE C. RAULERSON – 16

☆☆☆☆☆☆

EVERETT BRADDOCK – 15 HAROLD EUGENE NORMAN – 16 RICHARD RUSSEL TODD – 14 EDWARD POOLE – 14 BILLY RAY BURNS – 16 MARCO GUTIERREZ – 14 WALTER C. GREEN – 16 LEON MANNING – 16 LEONARD JAMES NELSON – 16 GODSON WHITTAKER – 15 ROBERT GORDON – 15 ROBERT LAURIN GODDARD – 15 KENNETH LEE YORK – 17 TRUBEE BYRD – 17 ROWANE HOLLIDAY – 16 BOBBY WHITEHEAD – 15 WILLIAM EDWARD LEGGETT – 16 ROBERT HELGRAN – 13 OSCAR EUGENE MCCURDY – 16 WILLIAM RIVERA EMANUEL, JR – 16 JOHN LENNARD NAVE – 16 JACKIE CREWS – 16 ERNEST WOODARD – 16 ARTHUR KENT PATTERSON (aka William S. Johnson) – 14 DAVID EVANS HARRIS – 16

☆☆☆☆☆☆

JOHN HARRIMAN – 16 GB IRWIN – 14 HOWARD MCCALL – 17 OSCAR LEE CALDWELL – 14 JD THOMAS – 13 GEORGE F. CLAY – 13 WILLIS BUNYAN – 16 JAMES CAMPBELL – 15 BERTRAM THOMPSON – 16 WILLIE JAMES MURPHY – 17 SANDY JONES – 15 RALPH HALL – 16 MELVIN FALSON – 13 HERBERT LEE COVINGTON – 14 LUKE BENJAMIN – 16 TOMMIE L. WOOTEN – 15 WALTER ADAMS – 15 DAVID JONES (aka Cockran) – 15 EDWARD BROWN – 14 EDWARD DEMERRITT – 16 WILLIAM JENKINS – 13 MATEO BENARD COLUMBUS – 14 WILLIE C. MITCHELL – 13 CLARENCE MORTON, JR – 15 JOSEPH JOHNSON – 16

☆☆☆☆☆☆

CURTIS WILSON – 10 EUGENE FULLER – 16 THOMAS BOWERS – 15 LEON DUNBAR – 16 DAVID EAGLETON – 14 HENRY JUNIOR JOHNSON – 14 EDWARD FOSTER – 15 GEORGE EDWARD THOMAS – 17 ODIS SINGLETON – 16 JAMES WILEY BRYANT – 14 CURTIS DOWNING – 15 WALTER LEE NIXON – 15 JOHN TYLER – 16 ELMORE JOHNSON – 15 HENRY MELVIN JONES – 16 DOCK SMITH – 15 ROBERT LEE KING – 16 WILLARD LAMAR SHELTON – 16 ROBERT HAYS – 16 CHAS W. CHAMBERS – 16 RUSSEL HUTTON – 15 HOWARD CAYWOOD – 15 BOBBY HAYES – 16 BILLY CAUDELL – 16 WALTER R. HAYES – 17

☆☆☆☆☆☆

ARTHUR KENT PITTEBON(?) – (age unknown) WILLIAM P. NUNES – 16 EDWIN T. FINNIE – 15 MILTON LEDBETTER – (age unknown) LEROY SMITH (aka Leroy Gregory) – 17 JOE RODRIGUEZ – 17 BENARD MIXON – 15 ROBERT WESLEY DAVIS – 16 PAUL DAVID HUGES – 12 ROY JOHNSON – 13 LENARD JAMES LOTT – 16 JERRY LLOYD – 16 GABRIEL THURMAN – 16 ROBERT LEE BOSTIC – 14 GEORGE HILL – 13 JOHN ALBURY – 14 NATHANIEL TURNER – 15 LEO COLLIER – 17 TEEVESTER JAMES – 15 FLOYD RILEY, JR – 17 GEORGE NELSON – 15 NORMAN MCAULEY – 15 LYLE MACK PAULK – 16 EDWARD GIBSON – 14 WILLIAM EDWARD CORTEZ – 16

☆☆☆☆☆☆

ROBERT CHRISTMAN – 16 HUBERT BERRYMAN – 15 CHARLES LACGUEY – 16 CHARLES EDWARD KIDDY – 15 JOHN CHARLES CLANCEY – 15 DANNY LEE BOWMAN – 16 HOWARD GEORGE FAGG – (age unknown)

ROBERT ALTON SINGLETARY – 17 ELLIS MARLOWE HASKIN – 16 JAMES PHILLIP SLAWSON – 16 JAMES JOHNS – 17 BENARD JACKSON – 14 ARLISS BLACKMON – 15 BENJAMIN UDEL – 13 NATHANIEL BOWLES – 16 ROLAHO LYLES – 16 CLARENCE BOBBY BROWN – 15 WILLIE BRADFORD – 16 BILLY JACKSON – 13 RICHARD GILLYARD – 14 LEONARD WHITEHEAD – 15 FREDERICK NATHANIEL HARREL – 16 HENRY MCLENDON – 17 SAMOLE DARBY – 17 WILLIE LEE DOUGLAS – 15

☆☆☆☆☆☆

MOZELL BRADLEY, JR – 16 J.C. STEPHENS – 15 CHARLES BROWN – 15 GRANT BERNARD KEMP – 13 RONNIE FRANKIE ROSE – 16 JOE EDWARD ALLEN – 15 VICTOR STEPHEN GRICE – 16 TOMMY COOK (Mathias) – 15 JERRY COOK – 16 JOHNNY LEON WRIGHT – 16

  IT’S AN ENTIRELY different feeling you get when you’re able to put names to the children you’ve been speaking of….

  ♤Please Consider Helping In The Fight For Justice By Signing The 1st Petition: https://www.change.org/p/jenn-moslek-re-investigation-of-the-arthur-g-dozier-school-for-boys♤

  ☆ IF YOU OR SOMEONE YOU KNOW SUFFERED ABUSE, PASSED AWAY, WENT MISSING OR WITNESSED ANY WRONGDOINGS WHILE AT “THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL SCHOOL FOR BOYS” AKA “THE ARTHUR G. DOZIER SCHOOL FOR BOYS” OR THE OKEECHOBEE SCHOOL FOR BOYS, PLEASE REACH OUT VIA HERE AT findingflorida.blog OR ANY OF THE CONTACT INFO LISTED BELOW!!☆

  Want More “Finding Florida?” BE SURE TO “SUBSCRIBE”!

    FOR PRIVATE CONTACT SEND EMAILS TO:  [email protected]

  FOR ALL DOZIER RELATED INFO:

http://thewhitehouseboysonline.com

AND

http://www.whitehouseboys2007.com

  FOR FULL PHOTO GALLERIES & ADDITIONAL LOCATION INFO FOLLOW ME ON FB AT:  @GRAVEAdventuresFL

THE LOST BOYS OF DOZIER: Have You Seen Me? IT HAS BEEN about a year now since my involvement with the Dozier School For Boys began taking over my world.

New Look Sabres: GM 74 - MTL

Remember smashing the Habs during the win streak? Those were the days. Remember when I said 15 games ago that I was done bringing up the win streak? Beating the Montreal Canadiens so consistently was one of my favorite features of this season long before we took off on that unreal stretch. It feels like it was a different season the last time the Sabres edged the Habs in overtime. Had the bar-goers been billionaires at that point there would’ve been a statue of Jeff Skinner downtown. The Habs are in my top 5 most hated teams so I’m going to only send good feelings to Montreal enough to say go dispossess Carolina of their playoff spot. From here on out, I got nothing but hate for you French speaking trash talkers. With the conclusion of this game the Sabres are eight games away from the merciful end of another failed NHL season. Shockingly, this loss was the official elimination of the Buffalo Sabres from playoff contention. Yeah, I too thought that was like three weeks ago. I saw a lot of folks eulogizing this season after this loss and even some christening of the word that used to be reserved for the Bills: Drought. That is a conversation we need to have but I’ll save it for after our rewind of this game because this one was a little whacky. I’ll come out right now and say I was more interested in College Hockey, Soccer and College Basketball this weekend. I don’t think that was an uncommon feeling in Buffalo but its worth mentioning to say that there were parts of this game that were somewhat gripping. That hate Jack Eichel has when he plays Toronto exists in this team when they play Montreal even if at a fractional level. Jeff still-hasn’t-signed-his-contract-yet Skinner will tell you all about that. I enjoyed all these bits we’ll talk about, but it would’ve been more fun with the W. This one ended 7-4 Habs and the only reason that doesn’t give me shuttering spastic flashbacks to the Josh Gorges era is because we did help Montreal chase down Carolina.

Evidently the Sabres were having their fair share of flashbacks too. The good olde Canadian boys on the team must have known they were on Hockey Night in Canada in the first because Buffalo got some chances with a capital C. Carey Price was tested early and often but it took until 12:26 into the first when Sam Reinhart got the puck from Mittelstadt in front and snuck it through. Buffalo took a 1-0 lead into the first intermission and were feisty enough that I watched most of the second as a result. Big mistake. Claude Julian gave the boys a spanking in the locker room because a little over five minutes into the second period French Canada’s best came storming into the game with three goals in a little over nine minutes: Artturi Lehkonen, Brendan Gallagher, Andrew Shaw. Gallagher has dumb face and honestly some days I’m embarrassed to share a name with Andrew Shaw, so those goals hurt after I thought I had a game to watch. I was literally in the process of turning my attention to a March Madness game when a weird delay of game call gave the Sabres a powerplay. I know I shouldn’t expect much from those with this team but I’m a sucker for the Blue and Gold even at this juncture of the season. I was rewarded this time and Alex Nylander got a puck in the circle and one timed it past the most expensive goalie in the NHL. We are going to have a VERY interesting conversation about Nylander this offseason and I for one, cannot wait. Call me a silly, shell-shocked Sabres fan for being excited about those kinds of offseason things but if you don’t laugh, you’ll cry, right?

What followed was perhaps the least possible situation a Sabres fan might expect from this team: Johan Larsson did drop pass to… wait for it… Marco Scandella, who proceeded to beat Carey Price to tie the game at 3. I put those ellipses in there not to pretend I am real good with the English language, if you’ve read this blog long enough you know that’s not true, I put them in because otherwise that sentence might just not be believable. Montreal didn’t let us bask in the weirdness of this tie for very long and Sabres 2007 Draft Pick Paul Byron got the Habs back on top. That ended a period that included six goals my viewing because it was at this point my mother-in-law got all of us going out to the lake to see the Northern Lights. We didn’t see the Northern Lights and the Sabres never evened up the game again. There were however, four goals in the third: two were completely unpalatable, one was a Sabres goal and the fourth was by Tomas TATAR! That was kind of fun to say that name like that. The Sabres goal was Jack Eichel. Apparently this was his first goal against Montreal in his career. I know it takes a while to get all the teams in the NHL, but I didn’t think the last team standing would be in his division. It was a saucy crease goal, but it was a goal nonetheless. That’s all the scoring I care to talk about. The Jeff Skinner incident in this game is interesting because it happened at a time the optimistic among us could still see a comeback but not really. It also apparently involved a yelling match with Max Domi so we can all relate to yelling at entitled white boys. I was not tuned in, so I automatically go to blame Andrew Shaw for Montreal’s penalty box misgivings and Shaw was charged with two roughing calls in the third, one against Skinner. It was real fun dragging Montreal four months ago but now it feels meh at best. Like I’m writing this pissed off they couldn’t polish off a regulation win over Carolina tonight, should I be railing against them in a game that mathematically eliminated the Sabres from the playoffs? There is truly nothing holy in a season your team doesn’t make the playoffs.

It ended 7-4 and even for the most engaged among us at this point the feelings were more in June at the Draft in Vancouver than they were feeling for a Sabres team that lost in Montreal. There were many bemoaning the now official reality of an eighth straight playoff-less season. I’ve gotten started writing the Season Retrospective and I’ve been debating how to talk about this season. Talking to my not-so-hockey-obsessed siblings today gave me some more perspective. Yes: our playoff chances were 83% at one point, they won ten games straight! Yes: the collapse it took to turn that 83 into a 0 was of historic proportions. Yes: The Coaching Staff should be held accountable for that collapse. But, and this but is so important: in October we were predicting this team would be punching above their weight to make the playoffs. This ending is a little below expectations but not by a lot if this is strictly a conversation with ourselves from October. That sounds stupid and it is, but the point is we knew this season was a development year. It will end a development year even thought it had the strong chance of being a progress year at one point. Secondly, let’s talk about this word Drought. For those of you outside Western New York: in Buffalo the words and phrase “Playoff Drought” was always used for the Bills who went 17 years before making the playoffs. My brother for example had his first look at a Bills playoff game when he had already committed to his college. That was the big kahuna so when Buffalo Sports Fans use that word it’s a metal bat, not a 2x4. On the other hand, as it gets more likely the Hurricanes end their drought, the only active NHL playoff drought longer than the Sabres, it becomes more justified of a thing for us to talk about it more seriously with the hockey team. You can count on one hand how many times the Sabres have made the playoffs since the 2005 lockout. That is really the stat we’re using to turn the knife right now. Let’s stop with the seppuku and think about those four playoff appearances: two saw Eastern Conference Finals and one was a President’s Trophy season. Let’s not pretend the Sabres have not been good this millennia. Also: eight straight years without a postseason berth should be frustrating for no other reason other than it being the longest such drought in franchise history. Yes, it’s a drought; but its just a drought. 17 years for the Bills was historic league-wide in its drought-iness. 8 years is just tough for us within our fanbase. It’s not nearly as rough considering how bad, prolonged rebuilds have and are going in this league. Vancouver had their time in the sun eight years ago, but they’ve been terrible for most of the time since only now looking up. Edmonton… do I even need to complete this sentence? Let’s all chill out for now because it’s a little more than the optimist in me saying the 2020s are going to be the decade of the Buffalo Sabres.

Before I wrap up I want to add that Phil Housley is definitely going to get fired. Maybe its not before next season but if there isn’t a new guy behind the bench by Halloween I’ll be shocked. It’s exactly eight games left this season and if you’re considering recommending this blog to a friend now is the time. They’ll get a little taste of in-season blogs while getting what I really think is my wheelhouse: the offseason. Like and comment while you’re sharing and let me know when you want to see next season’s logo for the blog. I made a new one for 2019-2020 and I think its flatly better than that gray, yellow-column logo I got going right now. It’s certainly far more unique. Let me know because it will definitely be revealed on the blog by June, but it would be more fun if we get it out earlier than that. That’s all I got tonight, Let’s Go Buffalo!

Thanks for reading.

P.S. The only ray of light in the Canes making the playoffs is old bores like Don Cherry having to put up with the Storm Surge in the post-season.

Willem Dafoe has had one of the most eclectic and distinguished careers in film, earning a reputation for versatility and tackling difficult characters, like Jesus in The Last Temptation of Christ or the character named only as “He” in the twisted horror film Antichrist.

Dafoe has worked with scores of the most important directors in the industry, collaborating repeatedly with auteurs like Lars Von Trier, Paul Schrader, and Wes Anderson. But he’s no stranger to mainstream fare, too: Dafoe played supervillain Norman Osborne in the 2002 reboot of Spider-Man. He voiced Gill the fish (leader of the “Tank Gang”) in Finding Nemo. And he’s appeared in movies as different as John Wick, The Boondock Saints, and The English Patient. His role as a kindly motel manager in The Florida Project netted him his third Best Supporting Actor nomination at last year’s Oscars.

Now Dafoe has teamed up with the painter and filmmaker Julian Schnabel (The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, Basquiat) to play Vincent Van Gogh in At Eternity’s Gate. The Van Gogh of the film is in his waning years, and disdained by most of his peers — including, to some extent, his buddy Paul Gauguin, played by Oscar Isaac. He’s portrayed as an outsider artist, a man sinking into depression and mania while also becoming more and more prolific — and more and more convinced that painting is his divine calling.

At Eternity’s Gate premiered at the Venice Film Festival in September, where Dafoe won the Volpi Cup for Best Actor. I interviewed him in Manhattan the morning after the film’s North American premiere, as the closing night selection at the New York Film Festival. We talked mostly about painting — what he had to learn to do to play Vincent Van Gogh, how Schnabel was instrumental in teaching the craft, and how learning to paint like Van Gogh is really learning how to see.

Our conversation has been edited and condensed for clarity.

Alissa Wilkinson

So, how do you get inside the head of Vincent Van Gogh?

Willem Dafoe

I got inside his head — well, by painting, painting, painting.

Dafoe in At Eternity’s Gate, after Van Gogh cuts his ear off. CBS Films

Alissa Wilkinson

Have you painted much before?

Willem Dafoe

I had, but it was many, many years ago, and it was very different. It was a different kind of painting, for a movie called To Live and Die in L.A. I played a counterfeiter who also happened to be a painter. In order to inhabit that character, I learned to paint, but not nearly with the same understanding and the same intensity that I approached this — because obviously, this was different.

And I’ve been around painters all my life.

Alissa Wilkinson

Oh, really?

Willem Dafoe

Yeah. I really came of age in downtown New York, where the [art] worlds were very mixed up. It was a time of a lot of do-it-yourself stuff, and loft living, and a lot of my friends were painters. And Julian [Schnabel], I’ve known for like 30 years, so —

Alissa Wilkinson

I was wondering if you’d known Schnabel before now, back when he was best known as a painter, before he made Basquiat.

Willem Dafoe

I’ve been in the studio with him. He’s painted me. I’ve helped him move paintings. I’ve been there when he makes things.

Alissa Wilkinson

Van Gogh’s style of painting, and his technique, is very specific and very interesting to watch. How did you become able to imitate his style?

Willem Dafoe

Basically, with the help of Julian, I started painting shoes. I started painting cypress trees. We looked at the Van Goghs. He taught me a different way of looking, a different way of seeing.

When you’re not trained, you really leap to identify things in paintings — we’re so ingrained, no matter what our education is, toward thinking about representation. We’re literal about things, not really looking deeply.

But to express something may mean making a painting that doesn’t look like exactly like what it “looks like.” So Julian taught me to paint lights.

Oscar Isaac and Emmanuelle Seigner in At Eternity’s Gate. CBS Films

He also taught me about making marks. There is no bad mark. Painting is a series of marks, next to each other — putting colors next to each other. When I’m looking at you [he starts gesturing, indicating areas of my face], rather than seeing a woman, I see some black there. I see white there. There’s white there. There’s almost, maybe, there’s a little pink and a little orange, maybe? There may even be green there. You don’t have green on your face, but I’m seeing green.

And if I bring those things to a painting, I may be able to express something in you that really gets to who you are, or gets to a truth or a union with the nature of who you are, rather than a representation. It’s that kind of thinking, understanding of the origin of things and where things are going, that is a way of seeing. So I’m not just talking about the visual — I’m talking a certain kind of psychology of experience.

Alissa Wilkinson

And of knowing too, right? Of perception?

Willem Dafoe

Seeing things clearly. It’s very instructive when [Van Gogh] says, “I don’t invent these paintings. They already exist in nature, and I just have to free them.” That’s profound to me.

To be able to express that in a movie, in a non-didactic way, through action, through a narrative that’s constructed in a way that you just get swept up, is a beautiful thing.

My friend [the playwright] Richard Foreman quotes … I forget who he quotes when he says this … but he says, “Stories hide the truth.” I think there’s some truth to that. Van Gogh talked about that too — about The Sower, Jean-François Millet’s painting that he admired so much, he said, “There’s more power, there’s more truth, there’s more soul in that than any sower in the field.”

For me, that’s inspiring.

What I hope is that this movie gets seen, and wherever people respond to it, it’s for them, no matter what they do, even if they aren’t artists. It’s about ways of seeing and reconciling ecstatic states with what life is.

Alissa Wilkinson

A lot of what I loved about the film is that it’s a story about a man learning to see himself differently, through a framework of eternity.

Willem Dafoe

So much of the text —some of it’s inventive, some of it comes from his letters. But it was very good food for me. And then of course, I was painting. And I had beautiful conversations with actors who made themselves very available. That’s a beautiful place to be: to have a good conversation, and to be out in nature, and to paint.

Those were my activities on this movie. So I’m not thinking about interpreting, or expressing, or deciding, or saying who Van Gogh was. I’m not even thinking about Van Gogh. But I’m borrowing certain things from his life, to inhabit, to create something, to make something. To express a work of art, another work of art has to be made.

Alissa Wilkinson

A lot of this film was shot outdoors, in France. Some of it looked like it might not have been totally comfortable to shoot!

Willem Dafoe

Not comfortable for your body, but totally comfortable, because it guides you. But yeah, I can complain about who cold Arles was. How miserable.

We shot in all the places Van Gogh was. Saint-Rémy, that’s the actual place where he was. I’m not saying that to claim bragging rights — it just connects you. It was amazing to be in Auvers-sur-Oise, which isn’t so far from Paris. It blew my mind.

Willem Dafoe as Vincent Van Gogh in At Eternity’s Gate. CBS Films

Here in New York City, we can go upstate, and sometimes I’m amazed. I say, “Wow, it’s so green.” And, “Wow, it’s so close to the city.” Well, there are still landscapes, in Auvers-sur-Oise, that are recognizable from Van Gogh’s paintings. Particularly in Europe, land management and usage doesn’t change as radically as it does here, because it stays in the family, or it’s protected.

I was in those landscapes, and they’re his landscapes. He was seeing many of the same things. That does connect you. It’s why we go to historic places and have a sigh, and pretend we’re those people sometimes. To imagine events, and ways of being.

Alissa Wilkinson

I’ve spent some time in the south of France, and it’s always amazing to —

Willem Dafoe

But in the warm time?

Alissa Wilkinson

Yes, for Cannes [Film Festival].

Willem Dafoe

Ah, it’s completely transformed. Arles in the winter is quite severe, and there aren’t any tourists around, and restaurants are open like one or two days a week. It’s really a different thing. And because of that solitude, and that roughness but also coziness, it felt like another time.

I would walk from the little hotel room where I was staying out to where Julian was staying, and we’d paint. It had the feel of a village. It’s hard to imagine, but it was our little village.

Alissa Wilkinson

So were you painting things of your own, during the production?

Willem Dafoe

No, I was painting — I was practicing — the things that I would paint in the movie.

Alissa Wilkinson

Which are very recognizable.

Willem Dafoe

They’re done not always for exact likeness, and many paintings were made for set dressing, because Van Gogh was living amongst his paintings. It was a beautiful thing to see. There was a whole workshop of people making, basically, forgeries for the set.

And then Julian would see them and he’d say, “Ah, that’s pretty good.” It would be a good likeness. It would look like a Van Gogh. It was a good copy. But he’d say, “It’s dead.” And then he’d get out the paint, and he’d start making marks, and the painting would come alive. It may have been less exactly like a copy of the Van Gogh, but it was more alive.

That was evidence of not only Julian’s power as an artist. But also in doing that, I could often see how marks mattered. Strategies, abandoning strategies, going toward technique and abandoning technique, all those things. It was a very concrete way to come to a better understanding of also what I was painting.

We’d start simple. He was a freak about how to hold the brush, how many brushes you could have in your hand and how to mix the colors, and keeping things neat. But working fast, you know? It was fascinating.

It was great, and scary, because I was his creature. I was his Van Gogh. So I had to inhabit it. I was the go-between, between this creation and the director.

Which is a beautiful place to be.

At Eternity’s Gate opens in theaters on November 16.

Original Source -> “I was his creature”: Willem Dafoe on playing Van Gogh in Julian Schnabel’s latest film

via The Conservative Brief

WATCH: Democratic strategist: 'Multiple other reasons' beyond dossier for Russia interference investigation

New Post has been published on https://usnewsaggregator.com/watch-democratic-strategist-multiple-other-reasons-beyond-dossier-for-russia-interference-investigation/

WATCH: Democratic strategist: 'Multiple other reasons' beyond dossier for Russia interference investigation

Transcript for Democratic strategist: ‘Multiple other reasons’ beyond dossier for Russia interference investigation

We’re back with “The roundtable.” Joined by Matthew dowd. Katie Walsh shields. Deputy chief of staff in the trump white house. Roland martin, host and managing editor of news one now. Former campaign adviser Karen finney. And Brian kilmeade. A new book out. Andrew yakson and the miracle of New Orleans. Let me begin with you, Matthew. It’s pretty clear it’s real now. Yeah, another boring week in politics, as it unfolds. I think the whole thing is totally department on who the person is, right? We have no idea. It could go in any different direction. It could be big. Little. The start of baiting somebody bigger. We have no idea what his game plan is in the course of this. And whether it finally reaches Donald Trump. It’s not a good thing for any white house to have to deal with this kind of thing. Anything like this takes them off their game. Off where they want to go. Off any message they want on tax cuts or tax reform or anything like that. We’ll see it unfold. It does guarantee one thing. This is going far into 2018. Which is a problem for the Republicans to have an investigation on. And Kate, you left the white house before this investigation heated up. Sit your sense they have figured out way to compartmentalize the investigation? As the Clinton campaign did? Yes. They’re focused on tax cuts. They’re going to make sure they get tax cuts for the American public. The president hasn’t spoken about this in the last 48 hours since this leak came out. I think you’ll see the white house continue to talk about hole. ING the American public. We have seen the discipline from the president. He just tweeted about Obamacare. Not the Russian investigation. Earlier in the week, Karen finney, you saw the tweets saying collusion now between the Clintons and the Russians. And also, we did learn that the Clintons’ lawyer, mark Elias did fund dossier. It came from an American company. That we had — had originally been funded by Republicans. As you mentioned earlier. I think what’s important, though, is less who founded it and what was in the dossier. And as you heard Adam Schiff talk about, a number of the things in the dossier have been V verified. I think regardless, with the announcement about Mueller, what’s important is we know there are multiple other reasons there is an investigation. There is a question of obstruction of justice in the firing of Jim Comey. The questions about Carter page. Michael Flynn. Paul manafort. Their communications and meetings with the Russians. Cambridge analytica. They reached out to Julian assange this week. The more it goes on, we learn — it keeps xwroeing. That is part of the problem. As we also learn that, some folks at the Kremlin actually weighed in on the memo that was part of the June 16 memo. “The New York Times” report. According to Democrats, it’s not fake news. There’s a lot there. To your question, if someone is marched in Monday, tomorrow, and it is something to do directly with the campaign, I think it’s one thing. If it’s something about Paul manafor the T and what he did before becoming part of the trump campaign. So, I would — to the gps situation. We found out it’s not a candidate. It was Paul sirng and his free baeken. We found out he was looking at two candidates in particular. He stopped the investigation as soon as Donald Trump locked up the nomination. As soon as he did that, he goes, okay, let’s see what happens from the Republican perspective. Then we find out that somebody else picks up the investigation, makes it international. There’s a Russian element. There was no Russian element to the free beacon-financed research. Then we’re supposed to think that John podesta has no idea that $6 million to $9 million is going out of the campaign, his lawyer says, oh, yeah, I approved that. You’re the lawyer sitting next to a client pretending he doesn’t know. As Karen knows. Roland knows. I’ve been highly critical for Hillary Clinton for a long period of time. I think all of us know that. I have to say, we need to give up the David copperfield or Harry houdini award for misdirection in this thing. This reminds me of the uranium deal that’s been debunked all along the way. There is no similarity between what Robert Mueller and what the Russians wanted to do and a dossier paid for in part by the Democrats in order to — Matt, why would you think that? There’s no Russian Yan relationship between the dossier and the Democrats. Here is what is laughable. We literally watch a campaign, of folks chant lock her up, that we can have a president under investigation, and hewe’re here right now. Will Republicans put patriotism above partisanship. Will conservative media folks speak truth or defend trump at any and all costs. I love how people are complaining about players taking a knee and the flag and excusing what was done. Get to the truth. Whitewater started with one thing and end with another. This is what happens when you go through a federal investigation. Why does patriotism have smz too with trump admitting he’s wrong? In is a guy who will knowingly lie and not admit the truth. So what whether he says it, it’s relevant to me. The bottom line is this, when you have a foreign country that is clearly, undeniably involved in our election. No, no, no. One second. Excuse me. Excuse me. I’m not talking about that. I’m speaking of Facebook ads. Bots. All of that. We all — Brian, all Americans should — all Americans should want the answer and not failing partisanship. Brian lp let Karen get in here. There’s a pattern that we have seen time and time again in this administration. You start, you know, you’ll see the president tweet about or say something, this week, it was, we need to release all of Hillary’s e-mails. Throwing the the smoke screen back on Hillary. By the way, at some point, Donald Trump is going to have to be accountable for Donald Trump the president. Just before the news broke on Friday that Mueller was — is close to actually bringing charges, I thought, what is it that’s about to come out? This pattern we have seen before. Every time there is about to be a new revelation in this investigation, leading right into that, we’ve got all this blowing of smoke and oh, it’s about Hillary. Or, oh, Obama wire-tapped me in trump tower. You saw it coming? Of course. You visit absolutely reversed. What happened over the last three days. Revelations are out, thanks to fusion gps coming forward, prior to releasing their tax records, saying — It’s been over a year. No, they haven’t. It was denied by John podesta. The DNC. Two shows in Vegas. Misdirection. Hold on. I’m sorry if you’re frustrated. I’m not frustrate FPD truth is imprtant, Brian. Let me finish. I’ll tell you the facts. Tuesday, Wednesday, we get the revelations because gps did not want to hand over their records about who financed their international probe into Russia. Tuesday, Wednesday, $3.6 million from the Democrats. And $6 million from Hillary Clinton’s campaign. I want to get two facts. So this happens. I love this filibustering scam. He’s petty cute, Brian. I do consider myself cute. Brian, hold on a second. I’m stopping this. There are two facts. Two facts at the dossier that we know. We know that it had nothing to do with the intelligence community’s findings that Russia interfered with the election. Absolutely nothing to do with that. Number two, we know that nothing in the dossier came out during the campaign. So it had no effect on the campaign. Every intelligence agency said not only did the Russians interveer, they were intersphering to get trump elected and Hillary Clinton defeated. The argument mat that has to be made is that somehow Hillary Clinton and the Democrats contributed to her own defeat. Millions have taken to

This transcript has been automatically generated and may not be 100% accurate.

Original Article:

Click here