There is this whole idea that flipping a two sided coin doesn't have a 50-50 probability. It's not a new idea by any means, but the explanation is if you measured the mass of the coin, the force of the flip, the temperature of the coin & of the room, the force of any breeze, wind, or vibration in the air as it traveled, and so on, you could accurately determine within a small margin of error what side the coin will land on every time, and if you kept those constant it would flip on the same side every time. And that idea is also KIND OF the explanation for the conclusion in quantum physics that there is no free will.
A lot of people hear that and either clutch their pearls, roll their eyes, or aren't interested either way. (I mean, when you say some shit like that you're just going to immediately turn off any interest most people would have otherwise had but I'm digressing now). We all like to think we make decisions and choices, and then amateurs who want to talk about quantum mechanics alienate everyone by saying it's not true: you were always going to make these choices with no chance to make the other one.
But what I said in the first paragraph is something-like (but not exactly) what it means when you hear or read that according to quantum physics we have no free will. That if we had an unfathomable device that has been measuring all the variables of every single particle that was expelled during the Big Bang, with an also-sufficient/also-currently-unfathomable algorithm to plug those variables into, all within a computer that could do all of the calulations for BILLIONS of years, we could compute exactly where every particle was going and where it would end up, including those that make up the stars and planets, that make up the ground and oceans, that make up the animals and plants, that make up your brain and all of the proteins and neurotransmitters. That if it could all be measured and an algorithm sufficiently built then the decisions you make are already determined by the ongoing relationships and interactions the particles that make up your brain had in the past and are having right now.
However, humans cannot measure that, they likely never ever will.
Anyone that tells me they don't like quantum mechanics because something something affront to nature blah blah "they" don't believe in free will, etc. literally doesn't know it's just a rescale of the coin toss description. You still believe coin tosses are 50-50 because you aren't going to measure the variables used to receive an answer, you can still believe in free will because you can't measure the variables used to determine the ultimate path of all particles; I mean, I wouldn't become a theoretical physicist if that meant so much to you but I'm not your dad, do what you want.
Edit: I know I described the science mostly wrong, please check out the replies and reblogs for others' corrections and feel free to add corrections of your own for mine and others' learning, thank you.
105 notes
·
View notes
Love the oc stand! I love the concept of the stand’s save point ability and how it not over powered. The fact that in order too activate it’s ability requires the stand to preform an action with the user’s body makes it a nice change from other time manipulating stands where the user just needed to order a psychic command to their stand for its ability to activate.
https://www.tumblr.com/mister13eyond/737265696435765248/so-i-gave-vesuvio-a-stand-everyone-meet
Thank you so so much!!!
Yeah, I really love building stands with limitations! I think the nature of stand fights for araki is often building something with a weakness or a limitation on its power, then finding how to either exploit or overcome said weakness- I like thinking about how Vesuvio would have to strategize and overcome obstacles to win with RB!
I'm so happy to hear you liked it! Running Blue is part of a set of stands built with my loves and it took me quite some time to come up with its abilities and design, so I'm super proud of it- thank you tons and tons for the kind feedback!
2 notes
·
View notes
In the light of their comeback, I’m curious what your thoughts are on Kard especially in terms of their choreo? I find it interesting how the middle ground conceptwise their company settled on for a coed group was “sexy” and by interesting I think they played it safe
well, they certainly aren't trouble maker. or triple h for that matter. and personally i don't really have an issue that they aren't like, explicitly 'sexy' in the same way? there's a degree of intelligence to 'playing it safe'; they're not an overly strong dance group so they have to keep choreo relatively uncomplicated, and they do a lot of live singing, so there's another reason to keep choreo simple. also i think to some degree, most coed groups assigned sexy at conception seem to generate a lot of their interest (at least domestically) from a sense of scandal, and from what i can tell, kard does not seem to be interested in fostering that? whether or not it's company enforced, it's a respectable choice to make and i think it's fair to want to be seen as just a group making music and not have to generate attention from 'ooo look men and women on the same stage interacting'. tbh where i think their choreo (and them in general) is weakest is that they very rarely have discernable concepts other than 'latin inspired'. imo their best choreo is for gunshot, which has a very clear theme and is well executed. i think if they were to get some more distinctive visual concepts going, like they had with gunshot, it would elevate their performances more and they would feel less 'safe'.
12 notes
·
View notes