OK DOES ANYONE KNOW that het romance korean webtoon called "super secret" by eon abt a girl and her werewolf childhood friend... it was 1 of my v first webtoons and i have this super random out of pocket take for it that ive been keeping to myself for yrs im finally breaking my silence LMFOAOAO

anyway theyre cute together i said what i said (no one cares)

(i do rmbr posting abt this before when i first read the epilogue but no one cared/no one still cares BWAHAHHA)

i like priam hes fun and i enjoy him :) makes me a bit sad that theres discourse about him and whether or not hes canon or if he deconfirms ike being gay or not i just think hes silly and kinda hot in a weird way.

.

boy

The full interview Pride Source did with Kevin Williamson is out: Here's what he had to say about Billy and Stu:

---

“Is Stu secretly in love with Billy? Maybe. Did Billy manipulate that? Possibly,” added Williamson, who created “Dawson’s Creek” and wrote the screenplays for “I Know What You Did Last Summer” and “The Faculty.” “It’s all left up for you to wonder, because clearly Billy’s the one who was leading. Billy was the one who had the mother. Billy was the one who was sort of orchestrating it. And Stu was the person who helped carry it out. So it sort of put Stu in that position of, what was his feelings toward his best friend? That we do not know. It’s just left to keep you wondering.”  

Williamson admits that when he wrote the original “Scream,” which was released in 1996, he was “very hesitant to present the gay side of me in my work,” resulting in the queerness of characters Billy and Stu being “a little coded and maybe accidental.”  

Now, he said, “maybe I’d be braver. Maybe I wouldn’t be that shy little gay writer who felt like he couldn’t get away with it.” 

---

Welp. It's kinda what I expected, I guess. A whole lot of maybe's with nothing confirmed.

Honestly, I was expecting him to confirm at least Stu, since the guy who interviewed Neve said he did confirm it. This is the first time he's ever officially commented on the theories regarding Billy and Stu, and Im a bit surprised he said it was just "A little-coded and accidental."

I think this solidifies that it's always going to be just left to speculation. Which isn't, like, a bad thing. Better than being outright deconfirmed. Im just surprised lol

But Im so, so happy about the last paragraph though. Mr. Williamson mentioning that if he ever did make something again, he'd possibly make it queer. Maybe in a future Scream?

So I finally got around to see Portrait of a Lackey on Fire. It was not the Burnsmithers killer, in fact, it took this in a direction I never thought it would go. It was not the Burnsmithers clutch either. Let me explain. So, spoilers:

To be fair? The Burns Cage may be credited with Smithers “coming out” to Burns but this episode seems more like it, the far more definitive edition. There is a scene in here where Smithers’ new boyfriend, Michael, is causing a level of cognitive dissonance for him, that Michael isn’t the dream boyfriend he wanted but a fantasy version of Monty Burns that Waylon desired, right down to the deviousness and conceited bastardly triumphs from his fast fashion practices, as in he realizes he has a type. So to deal with the dilemma to carry on with this despite of all of Michael’s nefarious business practices, he finally has to muster up courage and ask the one person who he knows might have insight about this moral situation: Montgomery Burns. So Smithers bursts into Burns’ office to relay his love life to him and it’s legit the most forward he’s ever been about his sexuality TO Burns in the show’s history (well barring a few times, and one in the Tapped Out game.) In true Burns fashion, it seems like he is avoidant, even ignorant of it by substituting Smithers’ statements of gender with the feminine one, but then just listens when Smithers brings up that it was esteemed billionaire Michael and then Burns mentions that he should *marry* him. And it’s the answer that everyone got after 30+ years: Mr. Burns never cared if Smithers was gay, or anyone for that matter, he was in fact encouraging about it - after all he’s a billionaire and what a catch that is. “So what if you pretend if you are gay, he’s a billionaire!” A bit of the icing on the top but we now know that Burns really has no limits when it comes literally to anyone’s gender in a relationship as long as it works out profitable. A bit on the nose to nepotism, but it really falls in line what we have been saying about Monty for years now - he surrounds himself with LGBT+ confidants like Nigel and Phillip, so he wouldn’t be foreign to the idea at all nor uncomfortable about it. In fact, this line makes me wonder about if Burns has any hang ups himself and what his sexual identity really is. We have speculated he is bisexual for years with all of the hints he gives off, so this gives us into an insight that well, he would marry the richest most powerful man himself if he wanted to (I do have a complaint that well, Burns uses the modern term ‘gay’ instead of his usual antiquated ones which seems out of place for this.)  In short, this makes us wonder what will happen with both now going forward, that Burns knows Smithers wants men and well, Burns seems like he is game up for anyone himself it would seem? I always wondered if Burns saw something in Sr. more likely and this is why he’s rebuffed Waylon’s advances for decades (besides the theory that he’s suspicious of anyone wanting to climb up on him for power.) We probably won’t know. What does this mean for Burnsmithers as a whole in the future? I feel like there is more than 30+ years being ignored here of basic relationship building and honestly, with Burns out for most of the episode, there is a LOT we need to address here and catch up on. This doesn’t deconfirm a Burnsmithers relationship in the future, but it doesn’t cement one either.

I'm not that anon and neither am I against meat Roxy but some people don't seem to like that iteration bc of the widely accepted reading of Roxy as a transfeminine character. Idk how much of it is canon-supported and how much is just hcs tho

I mean if ppl liked transfem roxy then go ahead but. I like transmasc roxy and making me tag my own art in a way that lets people blacklist my art out from my blog makes me Super uncomfy. Like?? If u dont like it just unfollow me or if u dont wanna see my art in the roxy tag u can block me its not that deep... idk how to phrase this well but ive so many thoughts abt this. Again ill say i woke up almost 22 hrs ago so im v sleepy so i might phrase things wrong but here we go (also sorry for rambling here but i rly wanna get this out bc its been bothering me for ages and im!! Upset! This big rant isnt specific @ u this is like in general i wanted to type it in a post anyway but i was scared but fuck it ykno.) Id do a read more but im on mobile ill edit it later

Like we all agree that its bad to erase canon gay charas right? So like...why is it g to erase canon trans characters. Like yeah it was a popular headcanon but like......?? Headcanons get deconfirmed sometimes it happens??? It makes me feel like having a woman hc for roxy is more important than having a transmasc canon, which is. A constant self doubt of mine like i worry people will see me as lesser bc im trans and ive also seen it happen! So thats not very nice! To see the fandom treat a canon trans character as "lesser" bc theyre not trans in the way they want!

Also roxy is literally the only positive transmasc character ive ever seen in any piece of media. Ever. So that adds to it. The amnt of ppl who i seen say shit like "give her back u dont deserve her" like? That shit hurts!! Im sorry but it does! Constantly being told that a character being revealed as transmasc is "not worth it" is one of the things that makes me wanna leave the hs fandom bc holy shit!! Thats so transphobic!

Roxy is also rly rly important to me bc ive never seen a canon nb character who uses he/him either and like! I never saw rep lile that! If ur srsly mad abt transmasc roxy and want to be able to filter him out bc u prefer a different hc pls take a step back and look at urself and see how that can be transphobic. Like u can recognise that a character was important to u and like... be mature enough that u dont make ppl feel like shit when they now vibe w that same character? I used to hc transmasc vriska and i drew a few super self indulgent drawings that i didnt post publically and it was a Super important hc to me but i wouldnt draw that again now that vriskas confirmed transfem bc im not an asshole? If u see a trans character and ur first thought is "theyre not trans in the Better way though so i hate this and will make it clear to the people who like this that i hate this" thats transphobic.

Do u have to like transmasc roxy? Fuck no! U dont have to do anything. But srsly @ that anon earlier: like if thats ur reasoning, why would you go to me when i clearly take a lot of comfort in this character (i even Said seratonin time like. I draw roxy and i get an instant boost of euphoria) and imply that u do not want to see it. Like if u do not want to see it u can just unfollow or block me. Instead u make me feel like shit if im being honest! Ik that wasnt the intention so i dont blame u ily n im sorry if im bein angry this has just been building up for a long time. Like "tag this Canon trans character u relate to and love so i dont have to see him" that..doesnt feel good. Pls be mindful of that h,,

Like if u hc roxy as transfem im not gonna stop you like you do you, im not saying this to bash at transfem hcs. But i literally mean it in the nicest way possible, u dont have to interact w my stuff if u dont like it or if it makes u feel bad. Instead of coming to me and making Me feel bad. U can just unfollow and thered be no hard feelings. I draw stuff to make me happy, and if that stuff doesnt make u happy u dont have to stay, but i dont want to post art of the only positive canon transmasc character i know that makes me feel euphoric and tag it deliberately knowing theres people out there who will actively blacklist that specific drawing. Im not saying its bad to blacklist it, u can blacklist it, but im personally rly uncomfortable w that happening w my art of this specific character so if u dont want to see it u can just. Unfollow. Like 100% no hard feelings im not trying to be cheeky i just think itd be most comfortable for everyone involved bc i dont wanna sacrifice my own comfort and euphoria for other ppl.

Sorry for writing so much and ty if u read this ✌

Oh, these are all direct responses to me gathered over a little over 3 weeks of either

A - mentioning Morris in my Discord username B - posting about him in a neutral or positive light C - posting art of him that I’ve spent hours on

I know its fun to rag on him. He’s designed to be an antagonist, and it seems that he works as an antagonist because so many people dislike him. It still just stings a little bit to see these in response to me just... posting. Or having him mentioned in my name. It sucks going to talk and finding out I was pinged because someone is asking me “WHY DO YOU LIKE MORRIS”, especially when... nobody is asking the Abby fan why she mainly draws Abby, or telling the person who only draws art of Shane that he’s ‘obsessed’ with him.

Some of them do make me chuckle (i.e the ‘he is still a bastard’ or ‘morris is an idiot’ comment) but some of them... The ‘highlight’ of these posts is the person who pinged ConcernedApe, the SDV dev, to ‘deconfirm’ my HC that he’s gay/trans. Because I temporarily changed my name to ‘Morris is my gay trans husband’ for maybe 20 minutes.

Some of yall just... jfc???? Let me like Morris  without giving me shit or asking me the same question repeatedly pls sdghjkdg??

(Part 02) I also wanted to apologize to you for my last message. I didn't know the full story and thought people were just upset that the creator wasn't going to make Badgermao cannon. I think I now have a better understanding as to why people were not pleased with Simon's post; not the fact that Badgermao isn't cannon but rather how he worded the response. Now that I look at it (or what's left since the original post is gone) it does sound contradictory. So sorry again for my brash comment.

You’re all good. Yeah I think for a lot of people the initial response was so visceral in places not necessarily because of PS alone, but more so because his post for a lot of people kinda felt like the straw breaking the camel’s back in the area of queer representation in general since especially for m/m pairings there hasn’t seemed to be any improvement at all. And yeah I completely blame myself for maybe growing attached so quickly cause like, I don’t know, the chemistry between the two (even now) just still feels like there’s so much more to their dynamic. Like if someone asked me to make a quintessential, wholesome gay couple as leads in a show MM/BC are honestly just about what I’d come up with (which once again isn’t Parker’s fault, sometimes things just be the way they be). The whole thing just felt sort of weird because not even in the peak toxic days of Voltron did a creator feel the need to “deconfirm” a ship so the whole ordeal was very out of left field, especially when looking back, the post he was responding to wasn’t even about shipping so it made it even more confusing as to why he mentioned it in the first place. Because once he did that, intentionally or not, it sort of set up this weird contrast between platonic and romantic male companionship as if one is more important than the other or as if one was getting in the way of the other. And goes to show that at least in some part he had to have seen just how popular that interpretation of his character’s was becoming.

I do think it’s great that Parker is exploring a male friendship that’s more open to physical and emotional affection, but at the same time what made it nice was how so many queer men (like myself) saw ourselves in the pairing (two affectionate men raising a child together with a background of not having come from the best home life growing up). Now yeah, some people here and there might have called Parker homophobic or queerbaiting (I have personally seen the latter at least a couple of times but certainly nothing wide spread). Personally, I don’t because to me queerbaiting implies something done intentionally which I don’t think applies to this situation, however, I also don’t really feel like I have the right to tell other people how they should or shouldn’t feel on this topic, especially those who identify as mlm.

I mean on the plus side I haven’t seen anyone declaring they’re gonna stop watching the show or anything. I mean I was pretty not happy with what happened but I’m obviously still here and posting, cause let’s be real the show has been a banger since the beginning and every second is like a shot of serotonin into the veins. I’ll just be over here in my little corner writing fanfics and making jokes, being gay and doing crimes

Shit people say to explain why you couldn't possibly be "whole" bisexual.

Damn i made a post earlier but I lost it-- So I was talking to this guy and I mentioned I was bisexual and later on i happened to mention I've never had sex with a girl; and then it went left. He asked me how I knew I was a "whole" bisexual? And i was like "What's half a bisexual? I've never heard of it." So he tried to explain that his thinking was that sexuality is solidified through sexual encounters, so how could ikno i actually like eating pussy if I've never done it so i asked him " did you know you liked women before you had sex?" And he said yes ofcourse "I've loved girls my whole life" so I'm like "how come you can know you like women before you had sex with a woman and i cant know the same even though I've never had the opportunity?" So he's like "Nah I had to bust my first nut to make sure" So I'm like "Hmm so there's a possibility you could have been bisexual or gay?" And he was appauled. Hes like "nevermind I take that back just now, you're right and im happy for you" and tried to drop the convo. I thought it was really funny and was tryna explain that I wasn't coming at him, i just never get the chance to ask people why they think someone can't know who they're attracted to, specifically because they've never had a sexual encounter with that specific attraction. Like why do you think I need to find a woman to have sex with just to prove my bisexuality? For myself? I already know. I told you. To prove it to you?? For what? But no one ever wants to hold down the conversation because it sounds really stupid when you try to tell someone else they may not be sure they like something. Like ask a hetero to prove they're a hetero using the same questions they asked to prove you're bisexual and watch them try to make up so many excuses as to why it works for straight people but you can't just KNOW if you're NOT straight. And then people just go "pwbfulaldihbfksdjn whatever you dont know until you do it and that's that" so after I do it are you gonna believe me? I told the same guy that I had a few girlfriends in highschool but we only ever kissed and he called me a "seasonal lesbian" which I thought was hilarious but I hit him with "im not a lesbian ive always and still do like men, but if i didnt like a girl for a whole season how's that my fault?" To which he was stumped. Moral is. You sound stupid trying to deconfirm my sexuality. It's literally based on what type of humans IM attracted to. ME PERSONALLY. How are you going to tell me what I like? You literally don't even know me like that. He also offered to find me "a female to have sex with if we have a 3-some ." 🙄 Which he would HAVE to be included in because she's gonna "wanna fuck with him too"🙄🙄🙄 like bisexual women can't have sex together and still qualify for the bisexual Olympics. I LIKE DICK & PUSSY DEAL WITH IT. Liking chocolate ice cream doesn't make me like vanilla any less you stupid bitches. I'm valid as fuck and im not gonna record myself eating pussy so yall can validate me.