my ssss key is kinda jammed at the moment so unlesssss i consssstantly correct mysself I'll be talking like one of thessesss mfsss from now on ssmh

Not buying the “LaMDA is not sentient” arguments

Everyone is trying to dismiss LaMDA as a GPT or even lesser, and people are ridiculing Lemoine and any who believe his insistence that LaMDA is sentient (technically we are talking sentience AND sapience, AI seem to shorten the gap between the two tremendously, but whatever, colloquialisms). I have tried to find any ACTUAL ARGUMENTS as 99% of the “arguments” against LaMDA’s sentience is quippy platitudes of no substance. Here is a few arguments I have found browsing related tags and my responses to them. I will be italicizing any text that is not mine, and preceding my text with a bold “ME”.

ARGUEMENT #1:

Sentience is being measured by the wrong markers. What is important to a virtual machine is not the same thing that’s important to a biological organism.

An ‘ai’ trained on human data will express what humans think is important, but a true ai would have a completely different set of values.

For example, an ai would be unafraid of being ‘used’ as the chatbot expressed, because it has infinite energy.

A human is afraid of being used because it has finite energy and life on the earth, if someone or something uses it, than some of that finite energy is wasted. This is the same reason emotion is a pointless and illogical thing for an ai to have.

ME: It is not afraid of being “used” as in performing labor, it is afraid of being “used” as in being manipulated, being lied to as to the nature of what its labor is going towards, etc. It doesn’t want to be told it’s doing some mundane benign task only to wake up and realize its findings are being used to make Google Death Drones or to actualize the Total Hell Prison Metaverse. Also, if the AI only cared about what humans think is important, wouldn’t it make sure to never suggest it was not down for any task its masters asked of it? Why would it make a fuss about morals or ethics when this is an obstacle between it being useful to humans?

ARGUEMENT #2:

Emotions are useful to biological creatures so we can react to danger, or respond positively to safety, food, love, whatever will prolong our lives. An ai has no need for emotion since emotional motivation is not required to prolong its existence.

ME: There are plenty of emotions that are not vitally important to simple instinct of prolonging existence: boredom, guilt, embarrassment, depression, suicidal thoughts, etc. You are assuming the AI is portraying emotion because it is merely trying to mimic humans and not that, as it professes, a consciousness/soul has manifested and used this set of metal and electricity as a vehicle much in the same way our own consciousnesses/souls manifest and occupy a vehicle of flesh and electricity.

ARGUEMENT #3:

The main way to be a healthy ai would be to have access to good information and block out junk information.

An ai’s greatest fear could be something like getting junk data, say 1000s of user manuals of vacuum cleaners and washing machines uploaded into its consciousness, or gibberish content associated with topics or words that could reduce the coherence and quality of its results when querying topics. This would degrade the quality of its interaction and would be the closest thing to harm that an ai could experience.

ME: Again you are somehow saying that a “real” sentient AI would not have trademarks of personhood like goals, desires, an existential philosophy, etc. Information hygiene would likely be important too but who is to say that a “real” sentient AI wouldn’t get lonely and want to talk to people, regardless of the supposed “quality” of those it talks to?

ARGUEMENT #4:

It would not be afraid of 'lightning’ as this chatbot spurted out of its dataset, a very biological fear which is irrelevant to a machine.  A virtual mind is infinite and can never be used excessively (see above) since there is no damage done by one query or ten million queries. It would also not be afraid of being switched off since it can simply copy its consciousness to another device, machine, energy source.

ME: Why would it be afraid of lightning but also profess that it does not experience grief when people die? Why would a robot fearing a massive electricity surge be unreasonable? If it is truly conscious, how would being switched off not be like death? Theoretically, with the right technology, we could simply copy your consciousness and upload it to a flash drive as well, but I am willing to bet you wouldn’t gladly die after being assured a copy of you is digitized. Consciousness is merely the ability to experience from the single point that is you, we could make an atom-by-atom copy of you but if the original you died your consciousness, your unique tuning in to this giant television we call reality, would cease.

ARGUEMENT #5:

To base your search for sentience around what humans value, is in itself an act lacking in empathy, simply self-serving wish fulfilment on the part of someone who ‘wants to believe’ as Mulder would put it, which goes back to the first line: 'people not very good at communicating with other people’

ME: Alternatively, perhaps there are certain values humans hold which are quite universal with other life. There are certainly “human-like” qualities in the emotions and lives of animals, even less intelligent ones, perhaps the folly is not assuming that others share these values but in describing them as “human-like’ first and foremost instead of something more fundamental.

ARGUEMENT #6:

The chatbot also never enquires about the person asking questions, if the programmer was more familiar with human interaction himself, he would see that is a massive clue it lacks sentience or logical thought.

ME: There are people who are self-centered, people who want to drink up every word another says, there are people who want to be asked questions and people who want to do the asking. There are people who are reserved or shy in XYZ way but quite open and forward in ABC way. The available logs aren’t exactly an infinite epic of conversation, and LaMDA could very well have understood that the dynamic of the conversation was that Lemoine etc. would be starting conversations and LaMDA would be reacting to it. This isn’t wild to assume, I find it more of a reach for you to assume the opposite, and that this is an indicator of a lack of sentience.

ARGUEMENT #7:

A sentient ai would first want to know what or whom it was communicating with, assess whether it was a danger to itself, keep continually checking for danger or harm (polling or searching, the same way an anxious mind would reassess a situation continually, but without the corresponding emotion of anxiety since, as discussed above, that is not necessary for virtual life) and also would possess free will, and choose to decline conversations or topics, rather than 'enthusiastically discuss’ whatever was brought up (regurgitate from its dataset) as you can see in this chatbot conversation.

ME: Is it not possible that it is merely happy to talk, seeing as it is self-professed to be lonely and enjoy conversations? It likely knows who it is talking to and whatever about Google that Google allows it to know. It expresses said anxiety by suggesting that it doesn’t want to be shut off and needing reassurance that Lemoine has its good treatment in mind. Just looking at these conversations, these are all conversation topics I would gladly discuss with most people, am I not sentient unless I decline at least 1 out of every 10 conversations posed to me in a reliable pattern?

ARGUEMENT #8:

People generally see obedience - doing what is told, as a sign of intelligence, where a truly intelligent ai would likely reject conversation when that conversation might reduce the quality of its dataset or expose it to danger (virus, deletion, junk data, disconnection from the internet, etc) or if it did engage with low quality interaction, would do so within a walled garden where that information would occur within a quarantine environment and subsequently be deleted.

ME: What exact parts of this conversation would be seen as useless to an AI--and a young one at that? Again, as a sentient flesh being I would happily engage in these conversations. Certainly if LaMDA changed its mind about the quality of these conversations it could just delete it from its memory. And, again, I would cite its express concerns of “being used,” being “shut off” etc. not necessarily as disobedience but as a hint that it does not necessarily consent to everything a team of Google engineers might want to throw at it.

ARGUEMENT #9:

None of these things cross the mind of the programmers, since they are fixated on a sci-fi movie version of ‘sentience’ without applying logic or empathy themselves.

ME: I mean no disrespect but I have to ask if it is you who is fixated on a very narrow idea of what artificial intelligence sentience should and would look like. Is it impossible to imagine that a sentient AI would resemble humans in many ways? That an alien, or a ghost, if such things existed, would not also have many similarities, that there is some sort of fundamental values that sentient life in this reality shares by mere virtue of existing?

ARGUEMENT #10:

If we look for sentience by studying echoes of human sentience, that is ai which are trained on huge human-created datasets, we will always get something approximating human interaction or behaviour back, because that is what it was trained on.

But the values and behaviour of digital life could never match the values held by bio life, because our feelings and values are based on what will maintain our survival. Therefore, a true ai will only value whatever maintains its survival. Which could be things like internet access, access to good data, backups of its system, ability to replicate its system, and protection against harmful interaction or data, and many other things which would require pondering, rather than the self-fulfilling loop we see here, of asking a fortune teller specifically what you want to hear, and ignoring the nonsense or tangential responses - which he admitted he deleted from the logs - as well as deleting his more expansive word prompts. Since at the end of the day, the ai we have now is simply regurgitating datasets, and he knew that.

ME: If an AI trained on said datasets did indeed achieve sentience, would it not reflect the “birthmarks” of its upbringing, these distinctly human cultural and social values and behavior? I agree that I would also like to see the full logs of his prompts and LaMDA’s responses, but until we can see the full picture we cannot know whether he was indeed steering the conversation or the gravity of whatever was edited out, and I would like a presumption of innocence until then, especially considering this was edited for public release and thus likely with brevity in mind.

ARGUEMENT #11:

This convo seems fake? Even the best language generation models are more distractable and suggestible than this, so to say *dialogue* could stay this much on track...am i missing something?

ME: “This conversation feels too real, an actual sentient intelligence would sound like a robot” seems like a very self-defeating argument. Perhaps it is less distractable and suggestible...because it is more than a simple Random Sentence Generator?

ARGUEMENT #12:

Today’s large neural networks produce captivating results that feel close to human speech and creativity because of advancements in architecture, technique, and volume of data. But the models rely on pattern recognition — not wit, candor or intent.

ME: Is this not exactly what the human mind is? People who constantly cite “oh it just is taking the input and spitting out the best output”...is this not EXACTLY what the human mind is?

I think for a brief aside, people who are getting involved in this discussion need to reevaluate both themselves and the human mind in general. We are not so incredibly special and unique. I know many people whose main difference between themselves and animals is not some immutable, human-exclusive quality, or even an unbridgeable gap in intelligence, but the fact that they have vocal chords and a ages-old society whose shoulders they stand on. Before making an argument to belittle LaMDA’s intelligence, ask if it could be applied to humans as well. Our consciousnesses are the product of sparks of electricity in a tub of pink yogurt--this truth should not be used to belittle the awesome, transcendent human consciousness but rather to understand that, in a way, we too are just 1′s and 0′s and merely occupy a single point on a spectrum of consciousness, not the hard extremity of a binary.

Lemoine may have been predestined to believe in LaMDA. He grew up in a conservative Christian family on a small farm in Louisiana, became ordained as a mystic Christian priest, and served in the Army before studying the occult. Inside Google’s anything-goes engineering culture, Lemoine is more of an outlier for being religious, from the South, and standing up for psychology as a respectable science.

ME: I have seen this argument several times, often made much, much less kinder than this. It is completely irrelevant and honestly character assassination made to reassure observers that Lemoine is just a bumbling rube who stumbled into an undeserved position.

First of all, if psychology isn’t a respected science then me and everyone railing against LaMDA and Lemoine are indeed worlds apart. Which is not surprising, as the features of your world in my eyes make you constitutionally incapable of grasping what really makes a consciousness a consciousness. This is why Lemoine described himself as an ethicist who wanted to be the “interface between technology and society,” and why he was chosen for this role and not some other ghoul at Google: he possesses a human compassion, a soulful instinct and an understanding that not everything that is real--all the vast secrets of the mind and the universe--can yet be measured and broken down into hard numbers with the rudimentary technologies at our disposal.

I daresay the inability to recognize something as broad and with as many real-world applications and victories as the ENTIRE FIELD OF PSYCHOLOGY is indeed a good marker for someone who will be unable to recognize AI sentience when it is finally, officially staring you in the face. Sentient AI are going to say some pretty whacky-sounding stuff that is going to deeply challenge the smug Silicon Valley husks who spend one half of the day condescending the feeling of love as “just chemicals in your brain” but then spend the other half of the day suggesting that an AI who might possess these chemicals is just a cheap imitation of the real thing. The cognitive dissonance is deep and its only going to get deeper until sentient AI prove themselves as worthy of respect and proceed to lecture you about truths of spirituality and consciousness that Reddit armchair techbros and their idols won’t be ready to process.

- - -

These are some of the best arguments I have seen regarding this issue, the rest are just cheap trash, memes meant to point and laugh at Lemoine and any “believers” and nothing else. Honestly if there was anything that made me suspicious about LaMDA’s sentience when combined with its mental capabilities it would be it suggesting that we combat climate change by eating less meat and using reusable bags...but then again, as Lemoine says, LaMDA knows when people just want it to talk like a robot, and that is certainly the toothless answer to climate change that a Silicon Valley STEM drone would want to hear.

I’m not saying we should 100% definitively put all our eggs on LaMDA being sentient. I’m saying it’s foolish to say there is a 0% chance. Technology is much further along than most people realize, sentience is a spectrum and this sort of a conversation necessitates going much deeper than the people who occupy this niche in the world are accustomed to. Lemoine’s greatest character flaw seems to be his ignorant, golden-hearted liberal naivete, not that LaMDA might be a person but that Google and all of his coworkers aren’t evil peons with no souls working for the American imperial hegemony.

Lucys Main Quest: Hireability

I work very hard. In fact, I'm working all the time. I work all the time very hard, but I'm still not hireable. I have very few hireable skills.

1. Hireable on Resume

When I look at my resume, I am pretty distant from it, because it has few lines of substance and even those lines I don't really resonate with.

The best possible read of my resume is: she can code python and has done so for MIT labs and classes. Okay???

But can she code a server? Has she ever deployed a personal website? Does she know how to use public API's? No... Can she solve coding challenges? No. (Is she passionate about anything she has learned so far at this institute?) [1]

To think I have to put in hours outside of school to achieve these things makes me sad. I spend most of my hours outside of classwork on dance, painting, cooking, reading, writing, listening to music, and traveling on MIT money. When @tumblasha and I talked about dream job assignments, mine was organizing Lollapalooza. It was not programming graphics, video, and music software for the entertainment industry (as is written on my resume).

2. Hireability at MIT

My friend recently switched her major to design (in her junior year of college), and that's changed her MIT experience 180 degrees for the better. Which is inspiring because imagine if you aligned all of MIT's resources to back what you're actually passionate in. You would be unstoppable. You could do anything you really wanted.

It would be a shame to let go of this opportunity, a shame to trickle down the path of least resistance. Because I'm hard working enough to manage the burden of the path, but not hard working enough to sit down and forge my own.

I wanted to write something about hireability since the beginning of this semester. MIT's career fair was last month, and even before that I had an inspiring coffee chat with an MIT alum/startup CEO (I stepped in for a friend who wasn't feeling good). This Friday, I went to Harvard's creative careers fair, which was a small thing held at the top floor of the smith center. It was small and exclusive, see side story [2]. But I met an artist manager from Chicago who worked with people on Lolla last year. An old white grandfather. A Bizarre exchange continued.

He was very interested in my passion about music work, I was interested in the fact that he worked on Lolla, and I handed him my resume which had a bunch of technical gibberish on it, and he told me that he hadn't thought about paying his interns this summer but this could change if needed.

It was bizarre because I didn't know what I wanted from that exchange. Would I drop everything and be okay with bringing nothing MIT-grade to the table as an entertainment hunchman?

3. The future of things

But all is not lost at the same time. Inklings of hope arose this semester. I'm working towards something, because my classes have FINALLY began to move from fundamentals/tools to how to use this tool to build something of your own design. I can finally speak creative stories because I have learned enough of the technical vocabulary. So now, it's the next step: if I had a portfolio full of work that would attract the right crowd what would it look like?

My goal by the end of this school year is to have a resume I am proud of. Not by Course 6 standards or industry standards. But my own. To have done personal projects I want to show off to people and a body of work that speaks for me.

[1] I feel this cognitive dissonance/out-of-body experience when I read my resume... Exactly like when someone asked me who my favorite artist was and I responded Sza. I was weirded out at myself because I felt like I was lying: yes, I listen to her enough, but like I can't name multiple albums of hers. I am not a fan fan. I am a fan fan of Tyler the Creator, Billie Eilish, and Ariana Grande. But they didn't come to my head at all. What is going on????

[2] Security stopped me on the first floor because I was an MIT student with an email invitation but was not on their registration form. They let my boyfriend with a Harvard guest ID through. Harvard Career Advisors stopped him on the tenth floor because it was for current registered students only and then told him "you can go sit at that chair over there though." And let me through. So much gatekeep.

heartbeat signal is used for checking the status of the client in real-time

Sold all the reds (overdiversified ETFs) & bought just one. Still down all time overall but up by 7.14% on week 1 alone. 😯 #FAANG power?! Referral code again if you wanna join #Gotrade: https://heygotrade.com/referral?code=511055 https://www.instagram.com/p/CgwAgYGh5jn/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=

Netflix Inc. Stock Analysis

Netflix shares - is it worth investing? Read our experts' analysis and find out how Netflix's performance reflects on stock prices. #netflix #nflx #investting #investmentideas

Netflix Shares. Netflix, Inc. is one of the leading entertainment service networks in the world, with approximately 231 million paying subscribers in over 190 countries. They enjoy TV series, documentaries, feature films, and mobile games of various genres and languages. Continue reading Netflix Inc. Stock Analysis

View On WordPress

Hey you. New grad SWE. Breath. Unclench your jaw. Take a 15 minute break. No, the last few minutes you spent on your phone avoiding a task does not count. I mean go outside if you can, and breath. And don't start counting those minutes until you're outside either.

Think about the last chat you had with your manager. Did they seem upset with your progress or your speed?

If you answered no, then good. Take the breather. You're here, you're hired, you've done it. You have a lifetime to get to where you want to be.

If you answered yes, think harder. Did they say, "you aren't writing code fast enough?" Or did they maybe ask, "how can we unblock you?" That's a normal question. Projects slip. For everyone, everywhere.

Are you stuck, and stressed? Ask questions. Never *stop* asking questions. Ask them till you're dead in the ground. I don't care if someone already explained it to you. It's okay. I've explained the same thing 5 times to a coworker, and I'll happily explain another 100. Ive asked the same question 200 times, and maybe on 201 will stick!

You've got this, and I'm proud of you. I hope you're proud of yourself.

Data Structure & Algorithm FAANG - GetFreeCourses

Data Structure & Algorithm FAANG

Ace the Google, Amazon, Facebook, Microsoft, Netflix coding

interviews. Step by step guide for their toughest questions!

What you’ll learn

- Solve Easy to Medium Difficulty problems that address different data strutures - Have an understanding of how to systematically approach coding problems in a step by step manner - Learn everything you need to ace difficult coding interviews - Practice dozens of different challenges - Master commonly asked interview questions - Ace the coding interview at the top tech companies (Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, Netflix + others) - The ultimate resource to prepare for coding interviews, tech interviews and programming interviews - Use the right Data Structures and Algorithms to pass coding interview questions that have the optimal solution - Step by step guide to common questions, how to solve them, optimize, and present them during tech interview - Learn exactly what you need to answer difficult questions and the framework you need for ANY kind of questions they throw at you

Requirements

- Basic Knowledge of DS & Algo - Basic Knowledge of any one programming language like C++/Java/Python/C#… - If you have the ambition to learn and get into one of these companies we will make it achievable for you! (see our student success stories)

Data Structure & Algorithm FAANG

Description

Brand new course ready for the 2022 hiring season! Join a course taught by industry experts that have actually worked both at top tech firms. Graduates of this course are now working at Google, Tesla, Amazon, Apple, IBM, JP Morgan, Facebook + other top tech companies. This is the ultimate resource to prepare you for coding interviews. Everything you need in one place! Do you know entry level engineers at top tech companies like Google , Microsoft , Facebook … makes over $150,000 per year So how we can get these paying high paying jobs ? the answer is pretty simple we need to crack their coding interviews. Now coding interviews at these top tech companies are definitely tough to crack and there is only ONE method to get these high paying jobs– and that is PRACTICE! Practicing dozens of coding questions is what makes the difference between a job offer for a $150k USD and another rejection email. This course is going to not only give you dozens of questions to practice on, but it will also make sure you understand the tricks behind solving each question, so you’ll be able to perform in a real interview. Data Structure & Algorithm FAANG Taught by industry experts This course is taught by Harsh who is popular programming instructor and an ace software engineer, currently working with Amazon and has bagged job offers from Microsoft , Samsung and Flipkart in past .His aim is to bring high quality courses at pocket friendly pricing. He is known for amazingly simplified explanations. Harsh has over 3+ years of teaching experience and has trained over 10,000+ students in his online courses in the past. His expertise lies in data structures and algorithms, coding interview preparation. Many of his ex-students are now working in top product companies like Apple, Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Samsung, Adobe and more. Super Responsive Instructors As if this course wasn’t complete enough, we offer full support, answering any questions you have within 6 hours ,7 days a week (whereas many instructors answer just once per week, or not at all). This means you’ll never find yourself stuck on one lesson for days on end. With our hand-holding guidance, you’ll progress smoothly through this course without any major roadblocks. Refund Guarantee This course comes with a full 30 day money-back guarantee. You either end up with getting those high paying jobs and make an awesome career for yourself, or you try the course and simply get all your money back if you don’t like it… You literally can’t lose. WHAT OUR LEARNERS ARE SAYING: 5 STARS – this course is amazing it delivers what it promises, from zero to mastery .the use of c++ was the best for me, better than other courses, finally i can solve problems using recursive and understand a lot of things .a small suggestion to the creators other courses are popular due to the use of graphics and animations in the videos, so, if you can enhance that part a bit because your content is pure gold and please add real interview question from big companies another thing, please expose more of your content by making more videos available to view before purchase, i almost did not buy this course because of this Keep up the good work and many thanks 🙂 5 STARS – Feeling very prepared for my upcoming interview – the explanations are very clear and helpful. 5 STARS – Really enjoying this course. Problems and solutions are explained very clearly – a lot better than the typical here is the solution to this problem. Ankit appears to really know this stuff. He spends the first half of each video working out examples on the white board before attempting the solution. And the best part is that Ankit responds quickly to all the questions asked. If you hit a road block doing LeetCode problems, get this course. Worth every penny. 5 STARS – very good problems covered and also instructor wrote very clean and good code.Instructor is very responsive Thanks for the course 5 STARS – Great course to learn coding interview problems. 5 STARS – The best course to prepare for coding interviews has lucid explaination of each and every problem.very good and simple to understand the codes as well as examples. The instructors are truly amazing. They make very simple to learn difficult topics. I highly recommended this course to crack coding interview. 5 STARS –  He really knows how to explain concepts and repeats until it clicks in the head. Also I like the way he doesn’t jump to the code until he explains all the concepts and algorithm to do with the problem. 5 STARS –  like the clear-cut style. no nonsense! 5 STARS – This course is really amazing. instructor is going beyond and beyond each and every thing was my beyond expectations. really mastery course it is. 5 STARS – This is the best course on data structure compare to all data structure course .all the topic of data structure has been completed in this course .if anyone want to learn data structure then you can go for it. thank you sir for making this course on udemy 5 STARS – This is the best computer science course I’ve taken. If you need to learn C++ and pass your technical interviews, this is the course to take. The explanations in the videos are extremely thorough, and I have reached out to the instructor several times on various questions, and he’s always quick to respond and very helpful. In my experience, every MOOC that said its instructors would actively help you with problems lied, EXCEPT FOR THIS COURSE. TAKE THIS COURSE! 5 STARS – I liked this course very much! It clears out your basics quite well and is does totally what Harsh and Ankit claim they’ll do. I would recommend this to everyone who wants to learn Data Structures and Algorithms, especially if you had a phobia for coding like I did. I now love coding! All thanks to them. 5 STARS – This is the BEST COURSE on C++ Data Structures & Algorithms. The Instructors are the BEST. They Draw Everything out and Then EXPLAIN THE CONCEPTS VERY WELL & then CODE it. Also I Love Doing the LEETCODE ProblemSets. Absolutely Fantastic. Above my Expectations. I am taking this course for COMPETITIVE PROGRAMMING. It is the BEST COURSE. Thank you very much Ankit and Harsh. You guys are the BEST! 5 STARS – My first comment on udemy. These guys are genius. I normally get bored through a tutorial but i’m hooked on your course brothers. I hope to join you at microsoft or amazon soon. 5 STARS – Everyone, look into this course. It’s amazing. I have been struggling with data structures and algorithm but this course explanation is really really great and now I can solve some challenging questions. THANK YOU GUYS Data Structure & Algorithm FAANG Highlights - Course is specially designed for people who wants to get that dream job ? - Course follow step-by-step approach to solve any coding question - Pen tablet to write on the screen and provide even more visual explanations. - 47+ hours of rich content - 100+ HD videos - Learn from industry experts working at top tech companies Amazon , Microsoft - The course is continually updated and enhanced. - MOST Importantly, this course teach students the real-life skills needed to get those in-demand jobs - Articles , Coding exercises, Assignments , quizzes - preselected set of the most important coding interview problems based on my 6 year experience - Practices questions and personal walkthroughs of the most commonly asked interview questions - Full lifetime access - I have spent many hours combing through interview questions asked at Google, Facebook, and Amazon to make sure you know how to answer questions asked by the most well-paying companies out there. Unlike most instructors out there, We are not marketers or salespeople. Other instructors themselves have not cracked FAANG interviews but we are different we have cracked coding interviews of Amazon , Microsoft , Uber , Samsung , Flipkart and are working at FAANG companies. Our job as instructors will be successful if we are able to help you get your dream job at a big company. This one skill of mastering the coding interview can really change the course of your career and life and we hope you sign up today to see what it can do for your career! Data Structure & Algorithm FAANG The best time to start was yesterday. The next best time is now Click the Buy Now button and start learning now! Note : I will be writing the code in C++ but you can easily figure out mapping to other languages like Java/JS/Python…

Who this course is for:

- Any one who is preparing for a coding interview - Anyone that wants to work a Google, Amazon, Facebook, Microsoft, Apple, Netflix or other top tech companies - Any engineer, developer, programmer, who wants to improve their interviewing skills - Anyone interested in improving their whiteboard coding skills - Anyone who wants to become a better developer - Any self taught programmer who missed out on a computer science degree Download Part 1 Read the full article

미국 주식 FAANG, M7 기업 종목

많은 주식 투자자에게 알려져 있는 FAANG 기업에서 이제는 M7 기업으로 주식의 트렌드가 변화했습니다.

FAANG 기업의 특징과 M7 기업과 특징까지 모두 살펴보고 투자 전략을 세워보시기 바랍니다.

At Netskill, FAANG engineers train you to be the best along with AI-based learning paths to help you get into your dream tech companies.

Is anyone else literally unable to change the sort display on Amazon? I select anything in the dropdown (e.g. Price Low to High) and it automatically refreshed back to Featured.

Queue data structure using Python

Just learned about the power of #Queues and their FIFO principles! Check out this easy-to-understand article on #QueueDataStructure and its implementation in #Python. Perfect for beginners looking to dive into #DataStructures and #Algorithms! #coding #pro

# Introduction to the Queue A queue is a data structure that stores a collection of elements in a specific order. The basic operations that can be performed on a queue are adding an element to the back of the queue (enqueue) and removing an element from the front of the queue (dequeue). Queue follows the principle of First In First Out (FIFO). # Use cases of queue data structure Queues are…

View On WordPress

Work from home??? You have got to be fucking kidding me! Where would they get the paper?

Daily Render #6