Tumgik
#dynamic movement
ilikeit-art · 1 year
Text
200 notes · View notes
moniclimbs · 1 year
Text
Here’s the climb I chuffed on before, but I finally sent it! The second move was still hard to get, but it was so satisfying to catch.
M for J 2, V4
26 notes · View notes
blueharper · 11 months
Text
Tumblr media
5 notes · View notes
nebuladreamz · 2 months
Text
IT'S FINALLY FUCKING OUT AND I CAN FINALLY POST THIS!!!! (Go watch it NOW)
Thank you so much to @ohno-the-sun for hosting the map, this was the most fun first experience I've had with being a part of one :D
1K notes · View notes
Text
Don’t do this! Instead, be an Authentic Leader today!
Leadership is essential to align your teams in a shared direction and desired goals. But, a sudden burst of soulful leadership is not always easy in the workspace.
Becoming a leader is like a dynamic movement intervention. It is similar to understanding the weak nodes behind motor impairment and learning how to change those nodes. Leadership courses work similarly.  
This article Identifies some of the fundamentals of being a leader that you do NOT want to do. Keep reading if you want to move toward effortless management.
Do NOT focus on stress and reckless change around you!
Don’t be overburdened nor feel like a victim of stress with the reckless change around you. Good leaders bring a centered presence and manage their surroundings.
A good leadership practice is to analyze and understand the larger environment needed to make an impact.
Do NOT talk without listening first.
Listening is a superpower. Not many people truly hear. Mastering the art of listening will help you arrive at a fitting conclusion and decision. Ask yourself, “why am I talking?” Often if you are talking you are not able to explore the depth of the problem and can miss crucial information in understanding and making decisions.
Wise decision-making made from good listening is a quality of authentic leaders.
Do NOT be problem-oriented, look for solutions.
It is easier to focus on problems and blame others for the situation, but authentic leaders have the power to change situations. They own their mistakes and strive to correct them.  
Shift your attention to the solution instead of the problem; learn to improvise.
Do NOT be silent at the wrong time.
Listening is great but talking is often needed to calm the waters and direct employees to be functional, especially during demanding times. Taking time to talk in-person will help you connect and engage others, and know better how to bring about a change.
Do NOT play small. Think of yourself as a leader.
Being an authentic leader starts with thinking about yourself as a leader. You cannot call yourself a leader until you behave like a leader and empowers yourself to solve problems.
Visualize yourself being clear, understanding and directive. An authentic leader has a good balance between compassion and wisdom.
Conclusion
Although it may be daunting, with some introspection you can be a powerful leader. FInd  authentic leadership training that will develop your dynamic movements and interventions. Follow daily habits to build your new skills.
0 notes
miyoriia · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
@cyberpunkcatgirl ♡
1K notes · View notes
lexumpysfunland · 15 days
Text
Tumblr media
Baseball Narrator !!! this idea came from the amazing @ /squarratorsideblog and I had to draw Wally in his own baseball outfit-
find the original idea here
150 notes · View notes
mt07131 · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
"Don't let this city swallow you up. And if it does, make sure it remembers you."
@commander-sarahs-art has done it YET AGAIN with this absolutely GORGEOUS piece of everyone's favorite merc. I have said it before and I will say it again, if you have not commissioned her you are absolutely missing out
91 notes · View notes
ebrusidar · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media
Escape from Reality
257 notes · View notes
slydiddledeedee · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
teens who would kill you with hammers + bonus hermie the unworthy
442 notes · View notes
moniclimbs · 1 year
Text
Pretty behind on posting vids, but here’s another fun climb I did in Bishop. It took a good amount of tries to latch the crux move and move off with a three finger drag, but it felt sooo good once I got it.
Perfectly Chicken, V5
10 notes · View notes
natasha-in-space · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
I don't even go here, but I needed to make a gif set for myself, because my god I am going ballistic over this.
46 notes · View notes
hyperlexichypatia · 12 days
Text
This survey of why parents are estranged from their adult children is such an interesting illustration of how neurobigotry functions in society and interpersonal relationships. People accuse their estranged family members of being Mad/neurodivergent, because Madness is synonymous with being at fault in a relationship. It's considered inherently Reasonable and Justified to cut ties with a Mad/neurodivergent person -- especially an untreated-by-choice Mad/neurodivergent person -- because to be Mad/neurodivergent is to be inherently wrong, inherently unreasonable, inherently burdensome, inherently the one who is not abiding by the social compact.
Or as one of my friends put it, "Mental illness exists as a sociopolitical concept of ontological wrongness."
One of the pervasively enduring aspects of neurobigotry is that people who have been abused by neurobigotry will, instead of rejecting neurobigotry, simply accept it and turn it around on their abusers. People think they're really onto something with "No, it is my abusive parents who are mentally ill and need therapy" or "No, it is the people in power who are mentally defective" or "Racism/capitalism/bigotry are the real mental illness!"
But you can't dismantle the master's house with the master's tools. Pathologizing your parents doesn't correct the power imbalance of being pathologized by them, and using pathologization as a way to convey wrongness is still reifying pathologization and neurobigotry.
The context of family estrangement reminds me of this thought process I started about the construction of "cults." When the anti-cult movement began, it was centered on family members of people who'd joined new religious movements. The premise that people who joined religious groups their families didn't approve of were victims of "cult brainwashing" who needed to be "rescued" and "deprogrammed" (against their will, of course) was a tool of controlling families trying to deny their (usually) adult children's right to freedom of religion and general life choices. The idea that "cults" caused family estrangement was an integral aspect of the moral panic around them.
But over the decades, the stigma on "cults" has shifted. The contemporary anti-cult movement is fueled by people who grew up in abusive religious communities and chose to leave. It's applied as often to older, larger, established religious groups as it is to newer, smaller ones. While the original anti-cult movement largely centered on parents trying to control their adult children, the newer anti-cult movement largely centers on adults who've broken away from their parents' control.
Except. Except. It still uses the pathologization framework established in the 1970s. It's still a reversal -- No, it is you, the parents, the church, the authority, who are the Mentally Ill, the cult, the deviant, the ones in need of being fixed -- rather than a rejection or reframing: Actually, young people should be free to choose their own path in life.
It's not only applied in relationships between parents and children -- it's even more commonly invoked in breakups between former friends or partners. People feel the need to establish which party was Mentally Ill and Needed Therapy as a proxy for which party was At Fault in the breakup. In reality, breaking up doesn't necessarily mean either party was At Fault, but it's more socially acceptable to say "We had to break up because he's Mentally Ill and Refused To Get Help" rather than "We just didn't get along." Discussions of bad and badly-ended relationships are just constant rounds of uno reverse allegations of Madness/neurodivergence.
One of my least favorite examples is trying to "rebut" the neuromisogynistic trope of "Women are crazy" with "Men cause women to become crazy." Why are you validating "Women are crazy" by trying to "explain" it? Why are you accepting the premise that "crazy" is a bad thing? Why are you reifying the idea that being "crazy" has to be "caused" by something "bad"? If a man says "I broke up with my ex-girlfriend because she's crazy!" why validate the neuromisogyny with "No, you're crazy!" or "You must have made her crazy!" instead of challenging it with "What's wrong with being 'crazy'? What does that have to do with anything?"
If someone says "I stopped speaking to my child because they refused to seek therapy," why validate the neurobigotry with "You're the one who needs therapy!" instead of challenging it with "Why is their choice whether or not to seek therapy any of your business?"
42 notes · View notes
kafkasapartment · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media
The Bridge of Sighs, 1903-1904. John Singer Sargent. Watercolor and graphite on paper.
272 notes · View notes
gloriium · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
referenced springtime by claude monet!
happy (belated) birthday to sebek zigvolt ⚡️💕
217 notes · View notes
glasscandywitch · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
gankutsuou + incest as the meaning of the gothic novel - ruth perry
25 notes · View notes