Hanwha Solutions Acquires GRS to Supply Eco-friendly Materials

On February 28 (KST), Hanwha Solutions announced that it has obtained the Global Recycled Standard (GRS) from Control Union, an international recycling standard certification, for recycled polyethylene (rPE).

GRS is the most reliable certification among the many eco-friendly certifications required by global consumer goods companies.

Hanwha Solutions plans to increase the use of rPE-based industrial recycled packaging bags and strengthen collaboration with domestic consumer goods companies to diversify rPE applications and increase the supply of rPE to 10,000 tons per year by 2027.

Customer: DAD CALLED ME THIS DMV: FREE RAPE? Verdict: DENIED

Frank taking a depressed Monicas hand and getting himself off in 2x11 after she says no is so casual (?) it makes me think if he’s done it before and how many times

lylia4ever is a sad watch so you don't want it to ruin your day.. it's very accurate movie to life but realy hard to watch in some points

yeah the other day i heard a song from dancer in the dark in the radio and it reminded me how bad a movie can hit you 💀

It’s currently 8:30pm and I am about to start my revision for RE which is tomorrow 9am. Wish me luck!!

https://www.tumblr.com/happymixxx/745736737550139392/i-watched-both-trailers-hotd-season-2-one-for?source=share

Nevertheless, many find the change in Aegon's character attractive. I see how lots of people are starting to love him.

SOME BOOK SPOILERS

I agree! just by the trailer you can say aegon is better character now than in season 1. he did tons of horrible things who are being ignored by people (otto, alicent, erryk) or being justifed (like saying that the war is rhaenyra's fault bc she's not firstborn son and don't want to bend the knee). tbf it didn't needed much, in s1 aegon is always drunk rpist forced by his mother and grandfather to take the throne, now he can finally do sth on his own. and as from books we know those things are horrible (feast after luke's death, killing rhaenyra in front of her son, what they did to baela etc), they are also very interesting and intensive and speak a lot about aegon. he is a bad person but for sure good character, even more in the books than in the show for now and as we reach season 2 we will see more about him, which i'm very excited for.

so yeah, I see why people love / start to love aegon's character that was created. what i do not understand why they love him as a "person" in context of his behaviour or try to justify him. in fact he is the usurper, a rpist, a kinslayer and throws his own children to fighting pit. there's no point in denying it. many from team green do not understand that they can love a character without ignoring their actions or trying to justify them. there's no justice or good will in aegon's behaviour. it's pure chaos, hatred, anger and need of being loved and either you like to see it or not.

wrong ao3 tagging really should be a crime

For me, prostitution is a human rights violation against women and girls. Not everyone shares this understanding. We are now at a crossroads, with a number of countries around the world under pressure to either remove all laws pertaining to the sex trade (including those governing pimping and brothel owning), or to criminalize the purchase of sex (known as the Nordic model). However, the polarized debate on the sex trade, being played out within academia, media, feminist circles and human rights organizations has reached a critical point. No other human rights violation towards women and girls is so grossly misunderstood. While domestic violence has often been, and sometimes still is, assumed to be the fault of the victim (‘She was nagging him’, ‘She failed to understand his moods’), there has been a significant improvement in the way that those experiencing it are supported and the perpetrators called to task thanks to feminist campaigning and interventions. Rapists are often seen as men who ‘couldn’t help themselves’, or who were coerced into committing such crimes by the behavior and dress sense of the victims. But increasingly, again as a result of feminism, rape is viewed as an expression of misogyny rather than one of uncontrollable sexual desire. Not so prostitution. In recent years, despite the increasing numbers of women with direct experience of being prostituted coming out as ‘survivors’ of the sex trade, the dominant discourse is one of prostitution being about ‘choice’ and ‘agency’ for the women involved. The human rights abuse involved in the sex trade, according to the liberals, libertarians and many of those who profit from selling sex, is when men are deterred from purchasing sex, and not when they rent the orifices of a woman for sexual release. The women selling sex, according to this logic, are the victims of pearl-clutching moralists who wish to take away their right to earn a living. Indeed, supporting women to exit prostitution has been described as ‘an affront to human dignity’ in one academic paper, authored by four academics, three of whom have been campaigning for total decriminalization of the sex trade for a number of years. The war that rages between feminists such as myself who seek to abolish the sex trade, and those who see prostitution as a valid choice, is fueled by the widely held belief that feminist abolitionists wish to ‘rescue’ ‘fallen women’ and ‘demonize’ the men who pay for sex. The redoubtable feminist writer Andrea Dworkin once described herself as a ‘radical feminist: not the fun kind’. I use this phrase to distinguish myself from those neoliberal ‘choice’ feminists who have absorbed the argument about ‘sex work’ being empowering. These fun feminists ensure that they never upset men, and appear to be happier tearing down tried and tested theories of patriarchy and male power being the driver for the sex trade than they are asking how prostitution can be sexual liberation for the prostituted. I and other abolitionists are accused by the fun feminists of being ‘whorephobic’, since they claim we hate the women in the sex trade instead of the pimps, buyers and brothel keepers. I became an active feminist partly in response to the police investigation and media coverage of a serial killer who operated in the North of England during the 1970s. Peter Sutcliffe, named ‘the Yorkshire Ripper’ by the tabloid press, turned out to be an ordinary, married man living in a suburb of Bradford. The Sutcliffe case brought attitudes about women in general, and prostituted women in particular, out into the open, which in turn led me to join forces with some of the most passionate and committed antimale violence activists in the country. The public was led to believe, thanks to the police leading the case and the media reporting of the murders, that Sutcliffe hated prostitutes, when in fact only a minority of his victims were involved in the sex trade. The mythology that built up around the killer meant that police excluded a number of cases of women found murdered in England because they did not fit the profile. It also served to perpetuate the notion that women in prostitution somehow deserved their fate, and that rape and murder were merely occupational hazards. During the 1970s and into 1980, Sutcliffe killed at least 13 women and left seven others for dead. The body of his first murder victim—28-year-old Wilma McCann—was discovered in 1975 and, from the beginning, the West Yorkshire Police were guilty of dragging their feet and bungling the investigation. Complacent police officers overlooked vital clues, and inadequate technology was used to collate the thousands of interviews and intelligence reports they gathered. Amid all this, Sutcliffe just kept killing— with hammers, screwdrivers and knives—and police were no further forward by the time the body of his fifth murder victim, Jayne MacDonald, was discovered in June 1977. MacDonald’s killing was described by police and press as a ‘tragic mistake’. The previous victims had all been labelled as prostitutes and therefore, in the eyes of many, complicit in their own demise. But MacDonald was 16 and described by police as ‘respectable and innocent’. Victims were duly divided into deserving and undeserving women. Officers made a plea to the women of West Yorkshire to look out for strange behavior in their sons and husbands. But they failed to listen to one of Sutcliffe’s surviving victims: a 14-year-old girl who had had a good look at the man who chatted to her about the weather before striking her about the head several times with a hammer. When the girl reported the attack, she saw the photo-fits compiled by other survivors and told police it was the same man. They dismissed her because she was not in prostitution, and it was assumed the Ripper was only interested in prostituted women.

Julie Bindel, The Pimping of Prostitution

Have my first (proper) GCSE today. 2 hours starting at 9 in the fucking morning

Fuck RPE

My Copperright hyperfixation has gotten to the point of appearing in my dreams lmao

So fucked up to listen to David Tennant threatening to r-pe and murder Ace ngl

hey yall the person who drew this has a webcomic revolving around r*pe please stop reblogging it

❌ defenders get blocked and reported not arguing w you freaks ❌

url is hamletmachine

When the executive is rapidly promoted

For some reason I made Reginald very... green. It just fits hmkay?

(Reblogs are appreciated!)

The Henry Stickmin collection by Innersloth, drawing inspired by the Rapidly Promoted Executive (RPE) rank

Original creator of the art: me, @killer-lemon. Feel free to use my art as long as you credit me properly!