Seven riders on horseback and a dog trek across Canyon de Chelly, Arizona. Photo by Edward S. Curtis, 1904.
Click Links at bottom of pictures to EMBIGGEN
Edward S. Curtis - Story Telling - Apache, 1903
Edward S. Curtis - Navajo Woman and Two Children on Horseback, 1906
Edward S. Curtis - The Canyon, 1904
Edward S. Curtis - Taos Water Girls, 1905
Edward S. Curtis - The Vanishing Race, Navajo, 1904
Geronimo – Apache, 1905 - Edward S. Curtis
Edward S. Curtis ... Tells the Intimate Story of Indian Life with Motion Pictures.... Chicago: The National Printing and Engraving Co., c.1910. - Lithographic poster printed in 1910, when Curtis debuted his "picture opera," The Story of a Vanishing Race. The show included magic lantern slides of the photographer's work painstakingly hand-colored, supplemented by moving pictures, sound recordings of native songs, an orchestra, and Curtis's own narration.
Portrait of Edward S. Curtis, 1907 - by: Adolph Muhr
Edward Sherriff Curtis (February 19, 1868 – October 19, 1952) was an American photographer and ethnologist whose work focused on the American West and on Native American people. Sometimes referred to as the "Shadow Catcher", Curtis traveled the United States to document and record the dwindling ways of life of various native tribes through photographs and audio recordings.
Curtis's goal was to document Native American life, pre-colonization. He wrote in the introduction to his first volume in 1907, "The information that is to be gathered … respecting the mode of life of one of the great races of mankind, must be collected at once or the opportunity will be lost." Curtis made over 10,000 wax cylinder recordings of Native American language and music. He took over 40,000 photographic images of members of over 80 tribes. He recorded tribal lore and history, described traditional foods, housing, garments, recreation, ceremonies, and funeral customs. He wrote biographical sketches of tribal leaders.
70 notes
·
View notes
Photographs of men from the Assiniboine tribe;by Frank Rinehart;
Chief Yellow Boy giving a piece sign, 1890-1891
Four Bull and Chief Wets-It, 1898
97 notes
·
View notes
Edward S. Curtis - The North American Indian , Portfolios 1-20; and Volumes 1-20
Edward S. Curtis - Chief Joseph - 1908
Edward S. Curtis - Nespilim Girl, 1905
Edward S. Curtis - Okúwa-Tse ("Cloud Yellow")-San Ildefonso 1905
Edward S. Curtis - Badlands - 1905
Edward S. Curtis - A Zuñi Girl - 1905
Edward S. Curtis - Piopio-Maksmaks, Profile - Walla Walla - 1905
Edward S. Curtis - Saguaro Fruit Gatherers - Maricopa - 1906
Edward S. Curtis - Otter Robe - Atsina - 1905
Edward S. Curtis - The Piki Maker - Walpi - 1904
Edward S. Curtis - A Walpi Man - 1903
Edward S. Curtis - An Apache Baby
Edward S. Curtis - Two Oglala Girls on Horseback - 1907
Edward S. Curtis - Sioux Camp - 1907
Edward S. Curtis - The Maid of Dreams - 1907
10 notes
·
View notes
Bandoleer Bag. Fox artist, c. 1890. Cloth and beads.
Small rectangular cloth bag with long cloth handle. Completely beaded, with multi-colored angle patterns repeating on white beaded background, the field is organized in “threes.” Ribbonwork edging, and beaded and yarn tassels on bottom. The direct influence of Plains is visible in the bolder design of this bag.
3 notes
·
View notes
And now that you've answered that, why not sit back and enjoy a brief history of the American Revolution:
First, the Seven Years War happens. It's mostly thought of as having been fought in Europe, but a campaign (not that kind) is also fought in North America. It is called "The French and Indian War" by the locals.
Britain wins the war against France, and subsequently gets the rights to all land east of the Mississippi river.
Colonialists start moving onto native land, probably with a lot of aggression and arrogance. This is ok so far as Britain is concerned, because they assume that the colonialists can play nice with the natives.
That is not the case. As such, the natives push back against them. 500+ colonialists die during this conflict.
Britain realizes that the colonialists CAN'T play nice and forbids them from going west of Appalachian mountains. Troops are sent to enforce this. Taxes are raised to support the troops, levied mostly on the colonies because they're the reason this mess exists at all.
Wealthy Land / Business Owners get frustrated by Britain imposing its will on the colonies and disallowing them from spreading West. Sure, taxes are bad, but it probably wasn't the little folks paying the lion's share of them, except insofar as the fees associated with them are concerned, but you pay sales taxes, so you know that heavy toll already.
Unhappy working class colonialists don't like paying those extra fees, like any USAmerican doesn't like, but this dislike is further stoked into unhappiness via propaganda until war is inevitable.
France, convinced by wealthy colonialists, backs to revolution as a "fuck you" to Britain ("We can't have land in the Americas? Fine. You don't get your precious colonies, either")
America is born! If you're a wealthy white man you're free to do whatever! Otherwise you can fuck off.
Imperialist conquest of the continent begins in earnest ("but really it's just our Manifest Destiny to control the whole continent so it's alright").
+++++
Ultimately, if they don't benefit the wealthy, any establishment of rights in USAmerica regarding a disenfranchised group only happens after massive civil disruption.
Said rights are never seen as good by the establishment, only as the necessary price for keeping/restoring the peace.
For Example:
The north fought the civil war to keep the south in the union. The south fought the civil war to keep their slaves.
If Lincoln hadn't been killed and his VP hadn't bungled things as much as he did, there would be no amendment regarding slavery, it would be a purely legislative matter, not a constitutional one.
This means that, if Lincoln lived, we'd need to worry about republicans overturning anti-slavery laws too, in addition to everything else.
3 notes
·
View notes