Tumgik
#night at the museum: kahmunrah rises again
badpanini · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
BEARER OF WONDERFUL NEWS YET AGAIN. OH I COULD NOT BE MORE EXCITED FOR THIS
1K notes · View notes
tryanmybest · 1 year
Text
the more research i put into rewriting this movie (natm 4) the more historical inaccuracies i find in it
this is actually so upsetting, you guys
anyway have another tidbit for your troubles
Tumblr media
617 notes · View notes
nerdasaurus1200 · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
This feels like it could be a variant of that slug live reaction meme
53 notes · View notes
queersnakeboi · 1 year
Text
Random but, why the hell does Octavius have such a short tunic in NATM 4? Like he doesn't even have his shorts on underneath. And his tunic is so short.
Also did you know that in the first movie his shorts are just below his tunic. In the second they are farther down his legs. And in the third one they are just above the edge of his tunic.
I don't know why that was a detail I focused on watching the movies, but it was.
Actually it's probably because I like to focus on costumes/outfits and don't like it when I don't know why they changed.
This was random, I'm sorry.
203 notes · View notes
muddledbabbling · 5 months
Text
watched Night at the Museum: Kahmunrah Rises Again a couple days ago and feel so strongly about it that i wanted to post a review, lmao.
the plot was essentially a shitty rehash of the second film. the canon established in the original trilogy was tampered with without tact or explanation. everyone felt either out of character or like a caricature of themselves. it was obviously directed towards a younger audience, which is fine in and of itself, but was done in such a manner that it felt like the writers don’t believe youth are capable of critical thought (a common flaw in today’s media for kids, which i could go on and on about separately). there was One debatably funny moment in the whole movie. the art style made me inexplicably angry. they got rid of kahmunrah’s speech impediment. etc. etc.
i think an animated night at the museum could have been really fun! the inherent whimsy of animation and its advantages in fantastical settings would have made a perfect fit for the series, which made the terrible execution all the more disappointing.
if you got this far, thank you for reading! and no shade if you enjoyed the movie, don’t let my distaste bring you down. that being said, i’d love to hear other’s thoughts, good or bad, so please feel free to discuss :)
25 notes · View notes
maranelho-moved · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
wake up, a new reaction pic just dropped
164 notes · View notes
jeena-says-hi · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
I’m still thinking about this
95 notes · View notes
Text
So...
Is Night at the Museum 4: Kahmunrah Rises Again being classed as cannon by people, or...?
Besides the insulting lack of Jedtavius, (and lack of the ongoing gag of “small men do something that’s horrifying to them, yet nothing to us (i.e. the car tire, the squirrel, and the vent), this isn’t what the post is about... it’s about the inconsistencies.
Like, yeah sure there were a few in the original three, but they weren’t show stopping, or ruining the magic, or even confusing things, such as; Cecil Fredrick’s implying that he only found out about the magic of the tablet when he took the job as a Night Guard, and then enjoyed the magic. But, in the third movie it’s as if he knew ALL ALONG. No mention of Rebecca in the second movie, none of the “Amelia Earhart Look-Alike” in the third. Or,  Kahmunrah being wax rather than being a mummy. But, I can overlook that...
HOWEVER!
I will not overlook the magnitude in NATM 4.
Let’s talk inconsistencies.
There was no Joan of Arc in the original 3. Yes, I understand WHY they did this, but still, it was never even mentioned there was an exhibit dedicated to her. (Did they get a section for her between films?)
There was a severe lack of Teddy/Sacagawea, as if it was forgotten. (As there was of Jedtavius, but I can see why they cut that out.)
Larry has meant to have moved on, went to college, got a degree, and gone into teaching, yet he’s back at the museum??? Working as a night guard??? NATM 3 is about moving on, and letting go, but... now he’s back...
Where was Don??? Y’know? Erica’s boyfriend??? Don is never really brought up again in the next two films after the first, but they were dating, enough that Nicky sorta looked up to him and Erica trusted him to pick up Nicky. Did they break up, and it was never mentioned???? Ever...
And that’s another thing, Nicky’s meant to be in college at this point. To reiterate, that was the point of the third film, moving on and becoming better. Remember, one of the conflicts was Nicky had no idea what he wanted to do, he wanted to go DJ and Larry wanted him to go to college. He should not in High School. Not to mention, Nicky was flirting with that girl in the third movie at the very beginning, and didn’t appear to have a girlfriend, and the way NATM 4 implies that he’s TOTALLY gone for Mia, it would seem that they would be a “power couple”.
ANOTHER THING! Dr. McPhee is let on in the secret at the end of NATM 3. He is made aware that everything in the museum comes to life at night, and he sees it, and he’s amazed, he even finds it rather funny. Yet in NATM 4, he has no idea they come to life, and Nicky is trying to usher him out the door. And, McPhee seems to hate Nicky and Larry, despite in the end rather liking Larry and being thankful to him for taking the fall for the entire situation with the exhibits attacking.
ALSO, where is Ahkmenrah??? Did he just... vanish? Does he no longer exist??? Did he go back to England???
Which is also ANOTHER point. The reason at the end of NATM 3 everything came to life, was because it is a moving exhibit and was visiting New York. It doesn’t stay in one place for a long time, so it seems to have moved on from The Museum of Natural History, so... why does The Museum of Natural History STILL have the tablet? It should have gone with Ahkmenrah and the English Exhibit, and if it didn’t, Dr. McPhee would have probably been arrested. And, that’s what the exhibits wanted in NATM 3, for Ahkmenrah to have the tablet, and to be with his family.
Maybe the moving exhibit is still there? If so, what about Tilly??? She should still be there too, and I don’t think she would leave Laa, nor would Laa leave Tilly again. And if they did stay, Tilly would have been a good Night Guard rather than Nicky. And if they’re still there, where is Lancelot??? Where is Merenkahre and Shepseheret??? Where is Trixie??? (Therefore, it’s my belief that the moving exhibit is no longer there.)
Not finished yet! Another thing to note is... Kahmunrah is meant to be dead. Remember, he was pushed into the Afterlife through the Gate to the Underworld, right? Well, why and how is he back? “But OP, it’s another wax figure” I can hear some of you yelling; then why does he know what happened? If it’s a different wax figure, he shouldn’t know. Remember in NATM 2, when Larry found a bust of Teddy and Teddy had no idea who Larry was??? I do! So... it’s CLEARLY meant to be the same Kahmunrah.
Maybe it takes place between NATM 2 and 3??? But, it can’t! Because, Laa is there, and Laa was only introduced at the beginning of NATM 3. If Laa wasn’t there, I would have rather easily been able to say “it takes place between NATM 2 and 3″, but because he is, it means it’s MEANT to be after 4.
Maybe it takes place DAYS after the end of NATM 3??? Again, Larry and Nicky shouldn’t be there, the English Exhibits and Tilly should still be there, McPhee should know what’s going on, and Kahmunrah still shouldn’t remember/should not be alive and Akhmenrah should have been there.
There’s probably more, such as posters and pictures shouldn’t be moving in the Museum of Natural History, which is why Larry found the Smithsonian so cool, because the pictures moved unlike theirs, and they shouldn’t be used as portals as it was NEVER referenced before.
Also, the fact Joan had powers and Seth was a real God which should be impossible, given the fact everything else in the museum’s don’t work like that. Like sure, things like volcanoes blowing up is a thing, but like... besides things directly tied to the Tablet, things so as magic, permanent damage and stuff isn’t real.
Joan had hallucinations and more than likely a mental illness, so to see it used like THAT was just so not good. (A way with words I know) Yes, she had visions and later they came true, but the way it was used was wrong. As if what Joan saw was fact, rather than Joan having a mental illness, and trying to fulfill it. (There is nothing wrong with having mental health issues, or anything like that. I just believe the way they used her mental health and her hallucinations was wrong.)
And Seth... while I can see something like this being done, it was the fact it was done with laser eyes, like... THAT WOULD NEVER HAPPEN! The tablet doesn’t seem to let that sort of thing happen. (But, then again actually; given that Seth is more tied to the tablet I think it could. I think my main issue with that is; the laser eyes. I think it angered me more than I thought it did.)
So, yeah take this rant... I clearly didn’t like NATM 4... oops
72 notes · View notes
ahkmenrah · 1 year
Text
okay museumheads how are we feeling about this movie now that the trailer is out
65 notes · View notes
Text
Night at the Museum Animated Movie 🚨SCREENCAP🚨
Tumblr media
THIS IS WHAT WE’RE WORKING WITH, PEOPLE!!!
Still waiting for the trailer, though👀
65 notes · View notes
violetwolfraven · 1 year
Text
I was scared the new Night at the Museum animated movie would be bad because disrespect to Robin Williams but nope.
It’s just bad. It’s a bad movie. It completely disregards the established characterization, lore, and events of the 3rd movie and parts of the 1st and 2nd. I’d be able to forgive the creative liberties taken with narrative, scientific and historical accuracy if the jokes they were used for were funny, but most of them aren’t. The few good jokes are outweighed by all the stupid ones.
I do appreciate the addition of Joan of Arc. That’s about the only positive thing I have to say about this reboot.
This makes me so sad. I love the natm movies, and I said years ago that an animated reboot could be awesome and a great opportunity to teach kids about different eras of history, while still respecting the original cast and story.
This movie wastes that opportunity. The entire movie is a joke shoehorned into a badly-executed coming of age storyline.
48 notes · View notes
badpanini · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
are You guys seeing this.. do you see how jed looks at him in that last one.. My god !
888 notes · View notes
tryanmybest · 1 year
Text
gay.
Tumblr media
405 notes · View notes
mintytrifecta · 1 year
Text
youtube
SHUT UP WE HAVE A TRAILER I REPEAT WE HAVE A TRAILER
21 notes · View notes
Photo
Tumblr media
Night at the Museum: Kahmunrah Rises Again (2022)
This is a Movie Health Community evaluation. It is intended to inform people of potential health hazards in movies and does not reflect the quality of the film itself. The information presented here has not been reviewed by any medical professionals.
Night at the Museum: Kahmunrah Rises Again has frequent mystical lightning effects surrounding a supporting villain character. These effects happen frequently and without warning, with only the first instance lasting more than a second or two. One brief shot near the beginning has ominous flickering lights in a dark room.
For the most part the camera work is stationary, given the 2D animation style, but there are brief moments involving high-speed travel through tunnels or hallways.
Flashing Lights: 8/10. Motion Sickness: 2/10.
TRIGGER WARNING: An animal regurgitates an object it swallowed.
ADMIN NOTE: Disney+ has proactively included a strobe light warning for this film. We are glad to see this becoming a more regular practice.
Image ID: A promotional poster for Night at the Museum: Kahmunrah Rises Again
17 notes · View notes
beautifilms · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
Night at the Museum: Kahmunrah Rises Again (Matt Danner, Justin Lovell, 2022)
3 notes · View notes