Okay just coming to add into this crack ship that I absolutely ADORE.
So what happened in Storm’s End still happens, Vhagar still ends up with his Arrax Ala Carte meal with a side of Lucerys. But Aemond is horrified by what happens, he didn’t realise he didn’t actually want to kill Lucerys until AFTER he dies. Aemond confesses to his mother what happened and he looks so lost and filled with so much grief, he doesn’t know WHY he’s crying all he knows is that Lucerys is dead. His nephew is dead, the small, bright boy that followed him around the Red Keep like a little lost puppy during their youth is dead.
Alicent listens and for the first time in her life she makes a decision for herself and for her children.
She’s seen what politics and her father has done to her children. Halaena can barely stand her touch, Aegon drinks and whores himself to an early death, and here is Aemond. Her sweet, dutiful boy desperately holding on to her hands, broken and down on his knees as he mourns for the nephew he claimed he HATED.
Looking at him now, she finally understands why Lucerys’ death affected Aemond so much. Why it looks like the world has fallen down on him and why it feels like his heart was ripped out of his chest.
It’s because that’s exactly what she felt staring at Rhaenyra after her father announced his intentions towards Alicent.
Her boy had killed the love of his life and nothing could be done to undo it.
Lucerys is dead, Aemond is a shell of his former self and she knew that if she didn’t do anything the realm would be plunged into a war that had never been theirs to fight. Alicent makes a decision then and there, she would save her family. She moves quickly and in secret, it’s almost offensive to know how little Otto Hightower sees his daughter as a threat. A mistake really, Otto Hightower dies a painful death one night and the maesters declare the cause of death as a bursted belly and if the Queen Dowager and maesters say so then who were they to argue? She send a raven but doesn’t bother waiting for a reply, instead she drags Aegon and convinces Aemond to bring them to Dragonstone.
Up in the air, she imagines she’s on a different dragon, sitting with a different dragon rider with paler hair and lilac eyes she’s spent her entire youth gazing into, flying up up and away to see the great wonders across the narrow sea and eating only the tastiest cakes.
The gentle nudge from Aemond breaks her away from her daydreaming and brings her back to the present. They had expected the open hostility and the guards waiting for them, swords raised as they landed on the ground. But Rhaenyra has always been kind, even with red rimmed eyes and grief sitting heavily on her shoulders she allows them to speak and explain. Aegon bends the knee, Aemond bends the knee, Alicent bends the knee and Rhaenyra is crowned Queen.
It does not fix everything, does not bring back Lucerys or heals the grief felt greatly by those who loved him but it does stop the Dance.
Aemond thinks his sister a nobler woman than all the men in the realm combined. She does not ask for his head, despite Daemon and Jacaerys’ demands, instead she strips him off his title as Prince and exiles him and Vhagar from Westeros. Aemond does not think the punishment too harsh or too much, in fact he felt as if his sister had given him a slap on the wrist. If you asked him, no torture, no beheading, no eye mutilation would ever be too much for what he did to Luke. Besides, he was never planning to stay. The Red Keep is no longer home, gone are the halls that were once filled with Lucerys’ laughter and the rooms that were brightened by Lucerys’ smile are dulled, the castle is empty. Silent.
Aemond spends his years flying from place to place, lost and aimless. He spends his years mastering the art of the sword, learning new cultures and languages, and mourning Lucerys. He carries Lucerys’ memory with him like a gaping wound, raw and painful. Losing his remaining eye would have hurt less.
If there was one consolation, Aemond thought, at least he died hating me.
“It’s exactly what I deserve.”
16 notes
·
View notes
"Murder is Werewolves" - Batman
I don't got the SPOONS to do this thought train justice, I have seriously been trying to write this thing for MONTHS so just, idk, have this half baked skeletal outline of the essay I guess:
I don't believe that Batman's no-kill rule is primarily about rehabilitation or second chances.
His refusal to believe that Cassandra could have killed someone when she was eight years old because "how could a killer understand my commitment not to kill" is absolute fucking MOON LOGIC from a rehabilitationist standpoint. No jury on the planet would think for even a second that she could reasonably be held accountable for her actions in that situation! Her past cannot condemn her to being incapable of valuing human life under a rehabilitation centering framework. However, Batman's reasoning makes perfect sense if he believes that killing is a spiritually/morally corrupting act which permanently and fundamentally changes a person, and that corruption can never be fully undone.
Dick Grayson killing the Joker is treated both narratively and by Batman as an unequivocally WIN for the Joker. The Joker won by turning Nightwing into a killer. Note that this is during a comic in which the Joker transforming people was a major theme! Batman didn't revive the Joker because the Joker deserved to live; he revived the Joker to lift the burden on Dick.
His appeal to Stephanie when she tried to kill her dad is that she shouldn't ruin her own life. He gives no defense of Cluemaster's actual life. Granted this is a rhetorical strategy moment and should be taken with a generous pinch of salt, but it fits in the pattern.
When Jason becomes a willful killer, he essentially disowns him, never treats him with full trust ever again, and... Well, we can stop here for Bruce's sake. Bottom line is that his actions towards Jason do not lead me to believe that he thinks Jason can become a better person without having his autonomy taken from him, either partially or fully.
The Joker is, for better or worse, the ultimate symbol and vessel of pure, irredeemable evil in DC comics now. He hasn't been just another crook in a long time. He will never get better, he will only get worse. If you take it to be true that the Joker will not or can not rehabilitate, then there's no rehabilitationist argument against killing him.
Batman does not seem to consider it a possibly that he'll rehabilitate. Batman at several points seems to think that the Joker dying in a manner no one could have prevented would be good. Yet Batman fully believes that if he killed the Joker, he himself would become irredeemable.
Batman's own form of justice (putting people into the hospital and then prison) is fucking brutal and clearly not rehabilitative. He disrespects the most basic human rights of all criminals on a regular basis. It is genuinely really, really weird from a rehabilitationist standpoint that his only uncrossable line is killing... But it makes perfect sense if he cares more about not corrupting himself with the act of killing than the actual ethical results of any individual decision to kill or not kill.
In the real world cops are all bastards because they are too violent to criminals, even when that violence doesn't lead to death. Prison is a wildly evil thing to do to another human being, and you don't use it to steal away massive portions of a person's life if your goal is to rehabilitate them. In the comic world, Batman is said to be necessary because the corrupt cops are too nice to criminals and keep letting them out of jail. I don't know how to write a connector sentence there so like I hope you can see why this bothers me so damn much! That's just not forgiveness vibes there Batman!!
I want to make special note here of the transformative aspect. You don't simply commit a single act when you kill, no, you become a killer, like you might become a werewolf.
The narrative supports this a lot!
Why did Supes go evil during Injustice? He killed the Joker. Why did Bruce become the Batman Who Laughs? Bruce killed the Joker. Why was Jason Todd close to becoming a new Joker during Three Jokers? Because he killed people, to include the Joker.
Even if these notions of redemption being impossible aren't the whole of his reasoning (people never have only one reason for doing what they do) it is a distinct through-line pattern in his actions and reasoning, and it is directly at odds with notions of rehabilitation, redemption, and second chances.
So why does he give so many killers second chances?
Firstly because this doesn't apply to all versions of Batman. Some writers explicitly incorporate rehabilitation and forgiveness into his actions. You will be able to provide me with examples of this other through-line pattern if you go looking for them. The nature of comics is to be inconsistent.
Secondly the existence of that other pattern does not negate the existence of this one. People and characters are complex, and perfectly capable of holding two patterns of belief within themselves, even when they conflict to this degree. You can absolutely synthesize these two ideas into a single messy Batman philosophical vibescape.
Finally and most importantly to this essay: he has mercy on killers the same way that werewolf hunters sometimes have mercy on someone who is clearly struggling against their monsterous nature, especially if they were turned in exceptional circumstances or against their will. They understand that they are sick, damned beasts, cursed to always be fighting against themselves and the evil they harbor within. It is vitally kind to help them fight themselves by curtailing their autonomy in helpful ways and providing them with chances to do some good to make up for their eternal moral deficiency.
I think in many comics Batman views killers as lost souls. Battered and tormented monsters who must be pitied and given mercy wherever possible. (The connections to mental health, addiction, and rampant, horrifying ableism towards people struggling with both is unavoidable, but addressing it is sadly outside of the scope of this essay.)
Above all, the greatest care possible must be taken to never, ever let yourself become one of them, because once you have transformed the beast will forever be within you growing stronger.
To Batman, it is the most noble burden, the highest mercy, the most important commandment: Thou shalt suffer the monsters to live.
203 notes
·
View notes
see the thing is that i'm very much of two minds when it comes to gojo and fatherhood, in that i truly believe that gojo would choose—or strongly, seriously consider the choice—not to have children. i think he would feel that carrying on his lineage is a curse he's forcing his child to bear. a sentence for a crime they played no part in. because no one knows better how isolating the power he inherited can be than he does. how lonely it feels. how much of a burden it is to be so strong.
but satoru? your satoru? i think that he loves you so profoundly. so tremendously. so entirely. in an almost overwhelming way. in a way that's not normal, because he hasn't ever had to be. and truly, i think there's nothing on earth he wants more than for you to have his babies. your babies together. he wants to take you out in public when you're pregnant, or when you have the little baby in a pram for the world to see, and he wants every person who sees you to know exactly what it means. that you're his and he's yours and that baby belongs to you both—a living, breathing testament to your love.
and for what it's worth, i think he'd be a great father. he has an enormous capacity for love that went entirely unused for so so many years. he doesn't get it right all of the time (or even most of the time) but there's no denying in any possible way that he loves his baby with everything he is.
174 notes
·
View notes
A random late-night thought.
Tod didn’t think anything of Rudolf in life. The prince had been a tool, albeit an enjoyable one, to get to the empress. He doesn’t think much that the prince decides to stay as an angel either - he has countless angels.
He keeps all the trappings of his rank in his realm. A garden, a menagerie, and an apiary.
Rudolf’s task as an angel isn’t to see to the dead, it is to tend to the birds of Tod’s apiary.
And how could Tod not notice the angel that tends to his birds of paradise, to his eagles and herons, to his willful magpies and parrots?
11 notes
·
View notes